Forums: Climbing Information: Injury Treatment and Prevention:
Belayer Failure = Broken Back
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Injury Treatment and Prevention

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next page Last page  View All


Partner cracklover


Feb 13, 2007, 8:18 PM
Post #126 of 256 (9215 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [shimanilami] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
jakedatc wrote:

In reply to:
IMHO, if you plan to practice falling, make sure your belayer has a Gri-Gri.

your humble opinion is what makes for lazy ass belayers who think they don't have to lock off every time and are ready for a fall at any time. .

Well, it's brilliant opinions like yours that end up getting people dropped while "practice falling". If the belayer had used a Gri-Gri, the leader would not have been dropped. Why? Because the "default" on the Gri-Gri is to autolock. The default for an ATC, in contrast, is "dropped leader".

I don't know how anyone in their right mind can argue that a Gri-Gri isn't safer than an ATC. If you are one of those who are in this camp, please enlighten me.

Sorry, but this is a stupid reason to prefer grigris. No-one gets dropped by an ATC user because of the "default". Both auto-locking and non-autolocking devices drop people when their users screw up. And the proof is in the pudding: drops happen in equal proportions on the two devices.

Fact - the same accident could, and has, happened with a grigri, though by a different mechanism.

Let's not turn this into an auto-locking versus non-autolocking thread. I love the gri-gri and use it all the time, so this isn't a slag on the device. But any belayer who takes the attitude that their belay device will do the catch by default is not taking enough personal responsibility. Even though it autolocks, a grigri is just a tool - you must wield it correctly, or you will, sooner or later, drop your climber.

The real issues are:
1 - A climber got dropped, hurt, scared.
2 - A belayer screwed up, didn't use her belay device correctly, dropped the climber. I bet she's pretty scared, too.

In addition, we can argue that the habit of taking unneccesary falls increases the odds of someone screwing up on one of those falls, but that's certainly a point with good arguments to be made on both sides. What's not really at issue, though, is the belay device.

Though it is worth discussing how the belay device may have contributed to the fall, at least inasmuch as there may be something to learn about how to use the device more effectively. For example, if it turns out that Gail uses the same exact technique to belay her partner as her partner was using for her, I bet she'd be damn interested to find out that their roles of dropper/dropee could have just as easily been the other way!

GO


iamthewallress


Feb 13, 2007, 8:23 PM
Post #127 of 256 (9209 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 2463

Re: [gblauer] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gblauer wrote:
Seriously the most important lessons I learned were:
1) It can happen to anyone (even if you are the world's greatest climber, your belayer can fail you)
2) Cull the herd; only let those that you know, trust and have the experience to put you on belay.

1. Anyone can make a mistake when belaying, even the world's greatest belayer. None of us are infallable, even if we haven't made that mistake yet. We still could.

2. As a belayer, I tend to pick partners who don't fall as a matter of course because recognizing that true accidents can happen to us all, I don't want to be the belayer who is being admonished on the internet for being part of the herd that needs to be culled.

I know many exceptionally experienced people who have been dropped. In fact the more experienced someone is, it seems the more likely that such a fate has visited them just b/c they've had more opportunities for the odds to catch up with them. It's not that flukey of an occurance. To say that it shouldn't happen doesn't really accept the risk that exists because it does happen.

When you choose to fall, especially on purpose, I think that you need to accept that there will be a minimal but possible chance of your mainly non-redundant system failing, whether that's your rope, your anchor, your harness, or your partner.

Part of the Warrior's Way of choosing to fall or risk falling, as I understood it, is deciding that you're comfortable with that level of risk and accepting responsability for the outcome of your choices. Even if it works out the vast majority of the time for the folks who aren't trying if they're not flying, it doesn't allways because, as the Warrior's Way says, we can't control everything all the time. That's just a fact and, IMO, it's part of the game if you choose to play it.

I do hope that you heal, and I hope that your belayer heals too. It's hard to beleive that if you did make vocal and eye contact with her that she was actually uninterested in your safety at the time of your fall and that the rope didn't just slip away from her despite her best effort. She must be pretty emotionally destroyed, and even more so after reading this 100+ post thread entitled "Belayer Failure = Broken Back".


(This post was edited by iamthewallress on Feb 13, 2007, 8:44 PM)


iamthewallress


Feb 13, 2007, 8:37 PM
Post #128 of 256 (9189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 2463

Re: [curt] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
You make it sound as though a belay is some sort of objective danger, like avalanches, rockfall or other similar risks that are beyond our control as climbers--and that simply isn't the case. A good belayer would never make the mistake that happened in this case--period.

I disagree Curt.

Although an avalanche is certainly much more out of our control than the belay, the belay is controled by humans, and thus is inherantly error prone.

Although better and worse belayers exist, I don't believe that there is a perfect human out there who will never make a mistake.

If we choose to accept the risk of falling, especially in the context of "fall sessions" where falling is the whole point, I think that we need to accept that system failure can occur and decide if that risk feels small enough to us to continue to fall for practice or not.


climbsomething


Feb 13, 2007, 8:49 PM
Post #129 of 256 (9162 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [iamthewallress] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

iamthewallress wrote:

If we choose to accept the risk of falling, especially in the context of "fall sessions" where falling is the whole point, I think that we need to accept that system failure can occur and decide if that risk feels small enough to us to continue to fall for practice or not.
You have a way of articulating points in a much less flammable way than I would. On page 5, tomcat alluded to this point but was less refined. The point stands, though.

Something that is troubling to me is that in her many posts in this thread, the OP is not even hinting at any personal responsibility she may have had in this accident. While I am not saying that intentional falls are hogwash, I agree that the climber should be aware of the risks and what system weaknesses a seemingly harmless activity could expose- and it's not clear if she is aware of that. Just like even the best belayer could, in theory, mess up, even a controlled fall could (and did) have an unfortunate outcome. And I think it must be said that a controlled fall on a 30-foot 5.7 is probably more likely to result in injury than, say, pinging from the top of a 90-foot 12d. Now I haven't seen this shorty Pennsylvania gym route and never will, but I'd bet that there were just more and closer things to hit, including the ground. Now clearly she felt comfortable and felt the risk was acceptable at the time, but it turns out that it wasn't. This is worth at least meditating on, don't you think?

It's ultimately the belayer's fault and she knows it, but Gail played some role here and I think that should be on her list of things to take away from this.


(This post was edited by climbsomething on Feb 13, 2007, 8:51 PM)


zeke_sf


Feb 13, 2007, 8:53 PM
Post #130 of 256 (9150 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [iamthewallress] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As a final, final observation on this from me, I expect my belayer to catch me when neither one of us expects me to fall--much less when the fall was intentional! Devices have various shortcomings, and it is the belayer's duty to do his or her best to compensate for those and provide as close to a 100% as possible. That said, I've been distracted and had various issues myself. I guess I've been lucky on both ends of the rope. We should all use this as an opportunity to sort the good and bad advice, examine our own practices and thoughts, and, most importantly, catch the leader falls! My sympathy are with Gail as well as her belayer. Honestly, none of us wants to be in either situation.


maldaly


Feb 13, 2007, 8:55 PM
Post #131 of 256 (9143 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208

Re: [the_climber] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What's really bad, and shame on the climbing gym industry for this one, is that for every gym that demands that only locking assit devices be used, there is one that doesn't allow them at all. Fast forward to the courtroom where, faced with a plaintiff in a wheelchair from having been dropped, you have to defend whichever practice it was that you required in your gym. Can you even imagine all the battling expert witnesses?

Mal


Partner alexmac


Feb 13, 2007, 8:58 PM
Post #132 of 256 (9133 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [maldaly] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:

I'm with 'thewallress here. The single most important thing I do before being lowered off is make eye contact with the belayer to be sure he/she is paying attention and has got me. The second most important thing I do is to hold on to the other side of the rope with a death grip until I can feel that the bealyer has me. I HATE it when the leader clips the anchors then just drops off, assuming that I have him. No way...

Mal

Mal, your on belay ready to catch until your climber says "done climbing" and at which point if your off belay "belay off"; until that point your always suppose to be ready to catch. The person may be out of sight, out of ear shot, etc.


pylonhead


Feb 13, 2007, 9:05 PM
Post #133 of 256 (9116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2004
Posts: 283

Re: [cracklover] palm up or palm down? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
You mentioned that you see your belayer every day. Tell me, does she have any burns on her non-brake hand or fingers?

Reason I ask: There is a fairly common belay practice with a built in failure method. It was the way I learned to belay with an ATC, and I continued to do so until instructed to do otherwise by a guide, a year or so later. I had a hard time believing the guide that there was a problem with that my method, because *so* many people used it (and still do). So I looked around. Within a year, I had seen *two* people get dropped, both with that belay method, and both from exactly the reason described by the guide.

Here's the specific method, and the specific fault:

Palm up, pinch and slide, where the non-brake hand pinches both ropes.

Using this method, there is a moment when the belayer takes in rope, pulling it up parallel with the "live" strand. Next, in order to be able to slide the brake hand back down the rope, the belayer pinches both the brake strand and the live strand with the non-brake hand (typically left hand). If, at exactly that moment, the climber falls, both the belayer's hands grasp hard on the rope. Problem is, the belayer's left hand is pinching both ropes, and keeping the brake strand up too high, so the brake hand can't lock off. At this point, the belayer's hands are burned, he loses control, and no-one understands what went wrong.

...

Please note, if you're someone who's been belaying for 10 years with this method and thinks this can't happen to you - you're probably right! In my experience, people who make it past five years or so with this method seem to have sufficiently trained themselves to *let go* with the left hand when the climber falls, if it happens at that point in the belay method. This is highly anti-intuitive, since most of the time the left hand on the live strand helps catch a fall. There's just that one split second where the left must know *not* to do what it usually does.

I would be interested in the answer to the question posed above: Does she belay palm up? And are the belayer's rope burns on her non-brake hand?

I'm interested because I was dropped 20 feet in the gym, and the situation described above exactly matches what happened to us.

My belayer was experienced.. he's caught me falling hundreds of times of the course of several years. He belays with a palm up style with the pinch and slide method of taking in slack. When I fell he was taking in slack. He can't tell me exactly what happened, but I came all the way down, and he ended up with serious rope burns on his non break hand.

I was unhurt, because he never let go of the rope and slowed my descent without the benefit of his belay device (hence the serious burn).

Now I'm wondering if he didn't experience exactly the failure method cracklover is talking about.


maldaly


Feb 13, 2007, 9:05 PM
Post #134 of 256 (9116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208

Re: [alexmac] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.


jakedatc


Feb 13, 2007, 9:06 PM
Post #135 of 256 (9115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [cracklover] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami Other people have replied with most of my thoughts on what you wrote but:

Take a look at the Cinch paperwork...NOT A BEGINNERS DEVICE! like 10 different places. this uses the same basic mechanism as a gri gri to stop a fall.
from Petzl website
In reply to:
1. Self-braking system helps the belayer stop a fall.
2. Smooth lip helps guide the rope during descent.

Gyms, boy scouts, camps, insurance companies have been falsely lead to believe these devices are safer but like Mal said there have been FAR more drops since gri gri's have been out than not. Ever hear the "brake lever" called the gas pedal.. thats what it is.. what kinda beginner device calls for someone to Let Go when they instinctually want to hang on harder..

The Default for the ATC is to pull down and back to lock off.. I do this every time i pull in rope. I have even had someone fall mid "pull in" in palms up belay mode and i automatically locked off.. never left the ground. barely felt more than if they had just hung on the rope

So yes.. anything that lulls people into thinking it will do everything automatically will make them lazy. I once saw someone lowering with a gri gri and only holding the rope ABOVE it while using the lever.. thinking the lever would do all the speed control... luckily the kid got going too fast.. the belayer let go of the lever and i ran over and showed him what he was screwing up.


curt


Feb 13, 2007, 9:07 PM
Post #136 of 256 (9111 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [iamthewallress] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

iamthewallress wrote:
curt wrote:
You make it sound as though a belay is some sort of objective danger, like avalanches, rockfall or other similar risks that are beyond our control as climbers--and that simply isn't the case. A good belayer would never make the mistake that happened in this case--period.

I disagree Curt.

Although an avalanche is certainly much more out of our control than the belay, the belay is controled by humans, and thus is inherantly error prone.

Although better and worse belayers exist, I don't believe that there is a perfect human out there who will never make a mistake.

In an absolute sense, you are right, of course. Your belayer may even have a heart attack and die while he/she has you on belay--so there is always some risk. However, if belayer failure was normal for even skilled belayers, rock climbing would be a completely irrational activity.

iamthewallress wrote:
If we choose to accept the risk of falling, especially in the context of "fall sessions" where falling is the whole point, I think that we need to accept that system failure can occur and decide if that risk feels small enough to us to continue to fall for practice or not.

I agree with that completely--and "system failure" obviously involves things other than just belayer error.

This raises another interesting side-bar: It only matters if things work properly when you in fact rely on them. You may free-climb a 10 pitch route and never weight the rope. In that scenario, all of your placements, anchors, knots, belays, etc. were (by definition) good enough. However, every single time you rappel or fall everything must work properly to be good enough.

Curt


the_climber


Feb 13, 2007, 9:14 PM
Post #137 of 256 (9098 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142

Re: [maldaly] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Can you even imagine all the battling expert witnesses? <---- If the debates/arguments I have seen/heard/been a part of over the years is any indication it would be quite the battle. Devices such as the GriGri and Cinch are great additions to the existing gear, but in my oppinion should only be used be those experianced enough to know that they still have the job to do, not the device. I could see myself using such a device on a long belay while aid climbing where even the most attentive of belayers could unintentionally let their minds wander, but for me there is no replacement for good belay skills with a tube/plate type device, and the experiance gain from years of climbing. There is also no replacement for proper and clear communication.

I'm not that old yet, but remember when half the people you climbed with had stitchplates, almost everone could whip together a biner break, and a GriGri was something no-one had ever heard of. It is truely a shame that because a lot of people thought that these devices were a 'short cut' to good belaying such controversy over their use seems to be a daily topic. This especially when the real problem has been a lax approach to belaying in general by many. Belaying is one of the most important parts of the climbing system, but unfortunatly seems to recive far less respect than it is due.

Brenden


markc


Feb 13, 2007, 9:23 PM
Post #138 of 256 (9074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [alexmac] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

alexmac wrote:
maldaly wrote:

I'm with 'thewallress here. The single most important thing I do before being lowered off is make eye contact with the belayer to be sure he/she is paying attention and has got me. The second most important thing I do is to hold on to the other side of the rope with a death grip until I can feel that the bealyer has me. I HATE it when the leader clips the anchors then just drops off, assuming that I have him. No way...

Mal

Mal, your on belay ready to catch until your climber says "done climbing" and at which point if your off belay "belay off"; until that point your always suppose to be ready to catch. The person may be out of sight, out of ear shot, etc.

Do me a favor. Go look at maldaly's profile. See if you recognize the name of the little company he owns. Mayhap this guy has a bit more experience than you, and you should read with more care.

Mal isn't suggesting he's going to shirk his responsibilities on belay. He's suggesting he hates it when a partner takes an unannounced fall for the fuck of it. I can't say I blame him.

I've caught my share of unannounced (and equally unintentional) falls over the years. A couple were with the climbers near the third bolt, and me getting ready to feed slack. I've never dropped someone, but I could have dealt with less excitement in those cases.


jumpingrock


Feb 13, 2007, 9:24 PM
Post #139 of 256 (9068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 5692

Re: [jakedatc] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
So yes.. anything that lulls people into thinking it will do everything automatically will make them lazy. I once saw someone lowering with a gri gri and only holding the rope ABOVE it while using the lever.. thinking the lever would do all the speed control... luckily the kid got going too fast.. the belayer let go of the lever and i ran over and showed him what he was screwing up.

I've seen the same thing. In a gym where I got in trouble for using an tube device. Kid was lowering his dad, fortunately we got to him before he dropped his dad.


markc


Feb 13, 2007, 9:31 PM
Post #140 of 256 (9060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [maldaly] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.

That's because he usually doesn't have one.


Partner alexmac


Feb 13, 2007, 9:46 PM
Post #141 of 256 (9034 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [markc] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
maldaly wrote:
alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.

That's because he usually doesn't have one.

Sorry, you still helping look for WMD's to find a point.


Partner alexmac


Feb 13, 2007, 9:51 PM
Post #142 of 256 (9020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 23, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [maldaly] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.

My point is the belay job is to stay on belay, if someone drops , they catch until they are dead from other accident. Thus a person should always be ready to catch, you appear to excuse in your posting belayers out of a lack of trust.

I have seen good belays take a rock and keep their eye on the climber, I have been stung by a bee;

Then again maybe I misread what you were saying.


vegastradguy


Feb 13, 2007, 10:54 PM
Post #143 of 256 (8964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [alexmac] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

alexmac wrote:
maldaly wrote:
alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.

My point is the belay job is to stay on belay, if someone drops , they catch until they are dead from other accident. Thus a person should always be ready to catch, you appear to excuse in your posting belayers out of a lack of trust.

I have seen good belays take a rock and keep their eye on the climber, I have been stung by a bee;

Then again maybe I misread what you were saying.

you misread what he was saying. mal's pointing out that climbers need to communicate with their belayers- just dropping off without communicating needlessly increases the risk of an accident. not that a belayer shouldnt be ready for a catch at any moment- they should, but if you're going to drop off and you know it, wouldn't you check in with your belayer? i always do.

mal's on a pretty short list of folks i havent climbed with but would rope up with any time without question- i'd trust him on the other end of my rope any time.


Partner cracklover


Feb 13, 2007, 11:27 PM
Post #144 of 256 (8935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [gblauer] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Going back to the original "lessons".

1) It can happen to anyone (yes, even you)

True. It may or may not have this effect on others, but I'm going to think twice about my recent penchant for taking falls for fun at the gym. Despite the fact that my belayers have earned my respect and trust, every fall is still a roll of the dice, however much the odds are stacked in my favor.

2) You are only as strong as the weakest link in your system

True. Identifying what the weakest link is, though - that's the kicker! For example, are you a better belayer than she is? Unless you know what she did wrong, can you be sure? Do you know how often the gym replaces those nylon draws on the lead routes? You see where I'm going with this.

3) Cull the herd; select your belayers carefully and only allow those you trust to give you a belay

Unless you knew in advance that this partner was less than safe, and chose to climb with her anyway, this is both unfair and unrealistic.

4) Keep your circle small; know your belayers, constantly check on their potential for distraction, moods and energy level

Hmm, unless and until you figure out how and why she dropped you, I wouldn't make any assumptions. I wonder if it's more your shock, pain, and perhaps a little anger that's talking here. You're beating up on both yourself and your belayer. Knowing what you know now, is there anything that you actually would do differently? If not, you really have only three logical choices: 1 - Accept the possibility that this could happen again without warning with you as either climber or belayer, 2 - dig a little deeper to find out what happened, or 3 - stop taking lead falls.

Don't expect to figure it all out instantly, but perhaps posting here can be a tiny help/start.

GO


maldaly


Feb 13, 2007, 11:41 PM
Post #145 of 256 (8909 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208

Re: [vegastradguy] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vtg, you know you're taking your life in you hands, don't you? I'll be down there in a few weeks. Let's rope up.
Mal


gblauer
Moderator

Feb 14, 2007, 12:24 AM
Post #146 of 256 (8887 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2002
Posts: 2824

Re: [cracklover] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
3) Cull the herd; select your belayers carefully and only allow those you trust to give you a belay

Unless you knew in advance that this partner was less than safe, and chose to climb with her anyway, this is both unfair and unrealistic.

4) Keep your circle small; know your belayers, constantly check on their potential for distraction, moods and energy level

Knowing what you know now, is there anything that you actually would do differently? If not, you really have only three logical choices: 1 - Accept the possibility that this could happen again without warning with you as either climber or belayer, 2 - dig a little deeper to find out what happened, or 3 - stop taking lead falls.

Don't expect to figure it all out instantly, but perhaps posting here can be a tiny help/start.
GO

Actually, I was concerned about my belayer. I knew that she had climbed for a few hours and that she was tired. My gut told me "no" but I climbed anyways. So, I guess I will add:

5) Listen to your gut.

Also, my other lessons, "cull the herd", "keep your circle small" are still valid, for me anyways. You see I do a LOT of coaching and I act as a guinea pig for many new belayers (with back up). I will no longer be a guinea pig.

I will continue to take lead falls, do falling drills and push my lead in circumstances where I believe it is safe to do so. I love to climb (boulder, sport, Trad) and this incident, while sobering, will not stop me from continuing my training.

Please understand that I have seen the belayer everyday since the incident. She is a healer and she is giving me healing sessions. I absolutely forgive my belayer, she did not do this on purpose and she is eager to understand what exactly happened. Am I angry? Yeah, I have been training for months, I was in great shape (mentally and physically) and I was ready to send in EPC. But, sh%t happens and when it does, anger doesn't help. It's best to move on, face the challenge and beat it.


jt512


Feb 14, 2007, 12:29 AM
Post #147 of 256 (8878 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gblauer] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gblauer wrote:
Please understand that I have seen the belayer everyday since the incident. She is a healer and she is giving me healing sessions.

That's the least she can do.

Jay


oldladyjugs


Feb 14, 2007, 1:16 AM
Post #148 of 256 (8848 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2006
Posts: 4

Re: [gblauer] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"So, several months of hard core training down the drain with one 30 foot fall. I really hope I can get my head back together."

Not down the drain..NO WAY...just another path on the journey...you'll be safer, you'll share what you learned and NO DOUBT you'll get your head together--that's you!


markc


Feb 14, 2007, 1:17 AM
Post #149 of 256 (8844 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [alexmac] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

alexmac wrote:
markc wrote:
maldaly wrote:
alexmac, I'm not sure I understand your point here.

That's because he usually doesn't have one.

Sorry, you still helping look for WMD's to find a point.

This coming from a guy that couldn't find his ass with a headlamp and both hands. Stop bringing irrelevant political rants into climbing discussions every time someone from the US points out you're an idiot.


mayak


Feb 14, 2007, 3:01 AM
Post #150 of 256 (8779 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2004
Posts: 37

Re: [gblauer] Belayer Failure = Broken Back [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hey gail -- it's maya from an earlier gunks gathering you organized... and getting off the ATC vs. Gri-Gri debate, I just wanted to wish you a fast recovery and thank you for putting your story out there and sharing. It's important to realize that people I know can and do get injured climbing and that it's a potential for me as well. Thanks, --maya.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Injury Treatment and Prevention

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook