Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing:
Skill Level for Sport Climbing?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Sport Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


dc_climber23


Oct 24, 2005, 6:47 PM
Post #1 of 85 (17052 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 19

Skill Level for Sport Climbing?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help


misanthropic_nihilist


Oct 24, 2005, 7:04 PM
Post #2 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 13, 2005
Posts: 172

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'd say as long as you can find a 5.7 or lower sport route that's not runout, you'll be fine. I don't really think there is much to worry about going from TRing to single pitch sport climbing, as long as you're climbing in a popular (i.e. well maintained) sport climbing area. Just make sure you bring enough quickdraws up the route with you (plus a few extra, maybe) plus a daisy chain/sling to clip into the anchor (while you thread the rope through the chainlinks) in case there aren't any carabiners on it.


misanthropic_nihilist


Oct 24, 2005, 7:05 PM
Post #3 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 13, 2005
Posts: 172

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh yea, don't back-clip either.


dc_climber23


Oct 24, 2005, 7:09 PM
Post #4 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 19

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What is backclipping?


deltav


Oct 24, 2005, 7:21 PM
Post #5 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You might want to take a class or get someone experienced to show you. If you dont know what back clipping, or Z-clipping is, then you are probably not quite ready for it. I'm not flaming you, just trying to keep you out of the obituaries.


dc_climber23


Oct 24, 2005, 7:25 PM
Post #6 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 19

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

haha, I figured that was the case.

no big deal, i definitely plan on taking multiple classes in the area before beginning to seriously sport climb and purchase the gear.

That being said, my original post was an attempt to gauge whether I am of a skill level high enough to even begin learning about sport climbing, or if i would be better off sticking with toprope.

thanks for the advice


Partner jammer


Oct 24, 2005, 7:26 PM
Post #7 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3472

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
What is backclipping?

First, find someone who climbs sport and have that person show you ... a picture paints 1000 words. Sport climbing is a blast and all you need to do is learn from an experienced climber ... not the web. Read books and the Simular Topics below.

jammer

edited to include Sport Routes start at 5.0 ... you're ready.


saxfiend


Oct 24, 2005, 7:57 PM
Post #8 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
haha, I figured that was the case.

no big deal, i definitely plan on taking multiple classes in the area before beginning to seriously sport climb and purchase the gear.

That being said, my original post was an attempt to gauge whether I am of a skill level high enough to even begin learning about sport climbing, or if i would be better off sticking with toprope.

thanks for the advice
Formal training is a good idea. You could learn from a friend probably, but the best thing I did for myself was to take a lead class at my gym. The owner (who is a solid 5.12-13 climber) spent hours teaching me clipping technique, lead belaying and all the other basics, then got me up on lead routes in the gym. The only thing I couldn't learn that way was setting and cleaning anchors, but I got that from my more experienced climbing friends. By the time I got out to lead outdoors, I really felt confident.

Buy or borrow a quickdraw and a rope (if you don't already have these) and spend a lot of time practicing clipping. You can waste a hell of a lot of energy on lead if your clipping isn't efficient.


joshy8200


Oct 24, 2005, 8:04 PM
Post #9 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2002
Posts: 646

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Buy or borrow a quickdraw and a rope (if you don't already have these) and spend a lot of time practicing clipping. You can waste a hell of a lot of energy on lead if your clipping isn't efficient.

This is some really good advice. If you've got a gym that allows leading...lead a couple of indoor routes before you head outside. Even if you practice clipping on the ground, it's a lot different when you're on a climb.

How much are you planning to pay for these 'classes'?!?! That sounds like a bit of a sham to me. Surely you have some friends at the gym that can show and tell you how to lead.


markc


Oct 24, 2005, 8:15 PM
Post #10 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Your climbing ability is less of a concern than knowing the proper procedures required for leading (proper clipping, anchoring at the top of the route, and transferring from climbing to lowering/rappelling). Some gyms may have a minimum ability requirement, but as long as you can find routes in your area well within your abilities I wouldn't worry about it.

As others have said, you can learn from friends, from the staff at a gym, etc. It all depends on what works well with your learning style and your budget. Take it easy and make sure you have a solid plan of action before leaving the ground.

If you can toprope 5.11 but don't know what the hell you're doing, leading is not going to be pretty. If you can only toprope 5.8 but you're safe leading at a lower level, there's nothing wrong with that. Routes will open up to you as you progress.


auraseer


Oct 24, 2005, 8:34 PM
Post #11 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 14, 2005
Posts: 20

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
How much are you planning to pay for these 'classes'?!?! That sounds like a bit of a sham to me. Surely you have some friends at the gym that can show and tell you how to lead.
A lot of gyms won't allow this. For insurance reasons the only people who can teach in the gym are their certified instructors.

That's the policy at the gym I go to, anyway, and I'm fine with that. I'd rather pay $30 for their lead class and learn from someone who definitely knows what he's doing. Saving the money isn't worth the chance of being taught by some joker who forgets or doesn't care about some particular important detail.


stevep


Oct 24, 2005, 9:03 PM
Post #12 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 93

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
You might want to take a class or get someone experienced to show you. If you dont know what back clipping, or Z-clipping is, then you are probably not quite ready for it. I'm not flaming you, just trying to keep you out of the obituaries.

While backclipping is annoying, it's generally not going to get you in to the obituaries. At worst you get stuck and lowered very slowly. Of dangerous things one needs to know about lead climbing, backclipping is a ways down the list.


dc_climber23


Oct 24, 2005, 9:31 PM
Post #13 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 19

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OK, so the general consensus is that I do not need to be a 5.10 climber to climb sport, and it is a worthwhile endeavor for climbers of all ability; however, it is very important to learn proper techniques associated with sport climbing, as lack of knowledge (not skill) would be the only reason for danger.

It would also benefit me to climb sport runs that are about one grade below my toprope level?

This is what I have gathered from your helpful responses. Is my understanding correct?


jt512


Oct 24, 2005, 9:33 PM
Post #14 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
What is backclipping?

It's something, the ignorance of which, indicates that you should not be leading.

-Jay


gene


Oct 24, 2005, 9:39 PM
Post #15 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2003
Posts: 65

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's certainly never too early to learn the mechanic's of leading, and I'd say the controlled environment of a gym is a good place for that.

As a fellow Northern VA climber, I am sorry to inform you that you won't find too many sport-routes in this area that are 5.8 and easier. There's a few out at Franklin, and one or two at Nelson, but that's about it.

By all means - get started on the knowledge and practice, and then as you advance up through the grades, a cornucopia of outdoor opportunities will unfold for you.

Enjoy the ride - destinations don't mean much in this sport - it's all about the Journey.


dc_climber23


Oct 24, 2005, 9:40 PM
Post #16 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 19

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"It's something, the ignorance of which, indicates that you should not be leading.

-Jay"

Like I said before, my original post did not prompt the question of whether my current knowledge of sport was great enough, but rather, whether my climbing skill would make attemping to learn sport climbing a worthwhile / safe endeavor. I fully recognize that classes and mentoring under other climbers will be necessary for safe leading.

Although you did not actually respond to my original question, luckily others did, and it appears that skill level is not an issue, but rather knowledge which would come from learning under others.


blitzkrieg_climber13


Oct 24, 2005, 9:51 PM
Post #17 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 288

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.


as to the question are you good enough to start sport climbing. as long as you feel comfortable on the route and have confidence in gear and belayer then you are ready.


bigevilgrape


Oct 24, 2005, 9:53 PM
Post #18 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.


as to the question are you good enough to start sport climbing. as long as you feel comfortable on the route and have confidence in gear and belayer then you are ready.

thats mean, rude, ect. everyone gets learns at diffrent rate, no go home and have your mother teach you some manners.


blueeyedclimber


Oct 24, 2005, 10:13 PM
Post #19 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
You might want to take a class or get someone experienced to show you. If you dont know what back clipping, or Z-clipping is, then you are probably not quite ready for it. I'm not flaming you, just trying to keep you out of the obituaries.

While backclipping is annoying, it's generally not going to get you in to the obituaries. At worst you get stuck and lowered very slowly. Of dangerous things one needs to know about lead climbing, backclipping is a ways down the list.

This shows me that YOU do not know what backclipping is. If you backclip and fall on it, the rope can come upclipped. That doesn't seem dangerous to you? You are descibing z-clipping. Please do not give advice if you don't know what you are talking about.

Josh


blueeyedclimber


Oct 24, 2005, 10:14 PM
Post #20 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.


as to the question are you good enough to start sport climbing. as long as you feel comfortable on the route and have confidence in gear and belayer then you are ready.

You must be so proud! Is your penis big, too?


deltav


Oct 24, 2005, 10:21 PM
Post #21 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.


as to the question are you good enough to start sport climbing. as long as you feel comfortable on the route and have confidence in gear and belayer then you are ready.

You must be so proud! Is your penis big, too?

LMAO!!! That's the funniest thing I've seen all day,thanks!
Judging by his posts, he spends more time doing that than climbing.


g
Deleted

Oct 24, 2005, 11:42 PM
Post #22 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered:
Posts:

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.
I don't know how useful comparisons are in climbing. If I compare myself to most of the people around where I live, I'm not that good of a climber. That doesn't discourage me a bit.

Some people are born with traits that are going to lend themselves naturally towards climbing, others are not. One person may put the same effort into a 5.8 as you have to put into a 5.10 or whatever. Should I be more impressed with you because you don't have to try as hard as the next person on the same climb? I bet their sense of accomplishment will be greater than yours.

Is it about chasing numbers, or the love of climbing?


ecjohnson


Oct 25, 2005, 1:06 AM
Post #23 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 19, 2005
Posts: 176

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
You might want to take a class or get someone experienced to show you. If you dont know what back clipping, or Z-clipping is, then you are probably not quite ready for it. I'm not flaming you, just trying to keep you out of the obituaries.

While backclipping is annoying, it's generally not going to get you in to the obituaries. At worst you get stuck and lowered very slowly. Of dangerous things one needs to know about lead climbing, backclipping is a ways down the list.

This shows me that YOU do not know what backclipping is. If you backclip and fall on it, the rope can come upclipped. That doesn't seem dangerous to you? You are descibing z-clipping. Please do not give advice if you don't know what you are talking about.

Josh


I have to agree with blueeyedclimber, not backclipping is about the FIRST thing you learn when learning to lead. Like blueeyedclimber said if you back clip and fall you can unclip the rope from the draw and deck if you are close enough to the ground, or really run out. deltav, I'm not doubting your experience, but maybe you need to get some terms straight. Backclipping can be very bad!


scottman13


Oct 25, 2005, 1:32 AM
Post #24 of 85 (17051 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2004
Posts: 38

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Buy a copy of "Freedom of the hills", it'll give you a load of info. Its widely considered the climber's bible.


bigevilgrape


Oct 25, 2005, 2:00 AM
Post #25 of 85 (17089 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Freedom of the hills is probobly not the book to buy if you are looking for information on sport climbing.


dilettante


Oct 25, 2005, 2:18 AM
Post #26 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2005
Posts: 16

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

if you can get out to the new river gorge there are some fun, safe climbs within your range. at summersville there i've done some good .7s, .8s, and .9s. there arent a ton of them because sport climbs tends to cluster in the 10s and higher. that's not a big deal though because once you know what you're doing, it's ok to fall and you can try harder stuff.

you just need to learn how to clip properly and a few other things so you can go to town with sport climbing. just like learning to belay and TR, these concepts aren't hard but they are crucial. take a class or ask someone you trust to show you how. remember that just because someone owns a gym or acts like they know what they're talking about, doesn't necessarily make it so...


deltav


Oct 25, 2005, 2:28 AM
Post #27 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just to restore my good name...Stevep quoted my OP and put his 2cents in about back clipping not being to bad. Trust me, I definitely know the dangers of back clipping.

And BTW, while Freedom of the Hills is a great book it is not the answer for everything


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Oct 25, 2005, 4:38 AM
Post #28 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
While backclipping is annoying, it's generally not going to get you in to the obituaries. At worst you get stuck and lowered very slowly. Of dangerous things one needs to know about lead climbing, backclipping is a ways down the list.

This shows me that YOU do not know what backclipping is. If you backclip and fall on it, the rope can come upclipped. That doesn't seem dangerous to you? You are descibing z-clipping. Please do not give advice if you don't know what you are talking about.

Josh

At WORST the rope can open the gate for half a milisecond and your weight can break the carabiner, the broken pieces of which would stab into your belayers hands, causing him to lose grip on the rope, and since he was using a body belay (ie no device) you then proceed to plummet down the rest of the 16th pitch, then the 15th and 14th, then the 13th, and so forth... untill you finally come to a stop (see: Instant Deceleration Syndrome) in the middle of a televised benefit picnic for orphans with leukemia. So backclipping I guess isn´t all that far down the list.

Z-clipping can be just as bad or worse. If you don´t notice it and your belayer doesn´t either, you can climb right past and, should you fall, your fall factor would increase significantly...

New climbers, don´t be scared by the above. Things are a lot scarier in the begining before you know what´s what. Don´t worry :wink:

PS: it´s never too early to start sport climbing. Sport leading takes just a little longer though (not necesarrily much).


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Oct 25, 2005, 4:48 AM
Post #29 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.

How productive.
Was going to flame you, not really worth it (your end remarks saved you today).
Everyone progresses at their own rate, be it 5.8 to 5.9 in a year or 11a to 13d in a month (not gonna happen). "The journey is the destination, man" and don´t let ´em tell you different.

In reply to:
...

Wow, are you serious?

I'm sorry but I climb MAYBE once every two weeks? I don't belong to a climbing gym and climb 3-4 times a week as many hardcore climbers do.
I apologize for being at a top school that requires probably 60-70 hours a week of work, and now having a top job that also requires 60-70 hours a week of work.

You really had nothing better to say than that? I appreciate the advice. I guess since I don't climb a 5.11b I ought to just quit, right? Jackass.

Wow. You may want to take a few hours off from your top job before you end up in a top psych ward. Chill... :)


kricir


Oct 25, 2005, 6:38 AM
Post #30 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 15, 2005
Posts: 434

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Back to the question of whether or not you should start sporting a # or two below your top rope grade. If this (I assume it is) will be your first outdoor lead, then yes. Just intill you become confident in the system of sport climbing, and adjust to leading on real rock. By that I mean for no more than like, 3 pitches.

Leading at or above your perceived “number ability” is a difficult mental barrier to get through, especially trad or alpine climbing. Once you do this, climbing will take on new levels of fun. Sense you chose to start with sport leading (I was not so smart) I’d say go for it. On one of those, “practice pitches” get comfortable with the idea of falling. In fact, find a route that is very safe to fall of off, (good rock, steep grade, make sure you won’t swing into anything) and take a few practice whippers. Don’t worry, your rope can actually handle hundreds of these short falls, just make sure you have a good amount of rope out. And don't take little 4 ft pussy falls, get in some quality 15 ft’ers. If you feel really scared and even start shaking after/before your first fall or so, don’t worry, this is natural. After a wile you wont even notices falls. Soon you will know that even if you throw your self at a 5.13, the system will work and you won’t get hurt.

Oh, I know this is a long post, but I must add, back-clipping is in theory dangerous, and whether or not it is a real killer is just a guess. But if anything, learn what it is and how to avoid it, because even if it does not get you hurt, it is bad technique. I think the climbers out there who have long, healthy lives are the ones who make really safe technique a habit, and live by it 100% of the time. Remember, even pros have rapped off the end of their ropes.


kricir


Oct 25, 2005, 6:51 AM
Post #31 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 15, 2005
Posts: 434

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I also wanted to add, grades are a good way of tracking progress, but the system as we know it is bulls%$#. Iv been on 5.8's that are harder then 5.10's. Oh and think about this, If you could climb 5.8-9 35-40 years ago, you would be a god. It sounds like you are just unsure of things. I say, get out there and figure them out like the rest of us did!
Good luck.


daithi


Oct 25, 2005, 11:26 AM
Post #32 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 397

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
If this (I assume it is) will be your first outdoor lead, then yes. Just intill you become confident in the system of sport climbing, and adjust to leading on real rock. By that I mean for no more than like, 3 pitches.

:D I can't believe you mentioned multipitch in any context with his first lead! Methinks he will have enough to worry about leading a single pitch!

dc_climber23, as others have mentioned the problem is not climbing at an insufficient level to start leading but a lack of knowledge. Leading a sports climb is not that difficult (at least from a gear point of view!) and there is not that much that you need to learn. If you know what back clipping is, z-clipping and how to clean an anchor (depending on what type of anchors are at your local crag), I reckon you would be good to go.

You can get all this from a good book (say one of John Long's books) but it will save you time and effort if you get someone to show you. I'm sure someone at your local gym will show you. It shouldn't take long. To anyone who is remotely mechanically minded a lot of it is intuitive.


blueeyedclimber


Oct 25, 2005, 12:55 PM
Post #33 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Z-clipping can be just as bad or worse. If you don´t notice it and your belayer doesn´t either, you can climb right past and, should you fall, your fall factor would increase significantly...


Oh, I can pretty much guarantee that you would notice it. It would suddenly feel like you are carrying a mack truck up with you. So, unless you consistently compete in the World's Strongest Man competition, I think it is safe to say it would be a noticable change.

Backclipping, on the other hand, can go unnoticed, unless you have a very attentive belayer looking for it.

Josh


jeldship


Oct 25, 2005, 1:04 PM
Post #34 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2005
Posts: 57

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

...


roniravia


Oct 25, 2005, 1:24 PM
Post #35 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2003
Posts: 12

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think you can start leading sport regardless of your level. It's whether you will enjoy it that's the question.
I have pressured myself to get into leading before I was ready and what happened is that I was extremely terrified and lost all of the fun I got from climbing. I came back to top-rope. Improved my technique and then I found the transition much smoother and today I feel much more confident to lead routes.
I would suggest you to start leading in the gym first (of course as you have mentioned, take some lessons before) and see how you feel. If you like it and it makes you feel good - then you know it's the right choice for you and you can gradually start doing it outside too.
If you feel too shaky and too hysterical (and I mean REALLY afraid not just a little because being afraid when you start leading is normal) then be patient and try again in a few months after working more on your technique and endurance.
Hope it helps. Good luck!


redpoint73


Oct 25, 2005, 1:34 PM
Post #36 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2002
Posts: 1717

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Z-clipping can be just as bad or worse. If you don´t notice it and your belayer doesn´t either, you can climb right past and, should you fall, your fall factor would increase significantly...

Oh, I can pretty much guarantee that you would notice it. It would suddenly feel like you are carrying a mack truck up with you. So, unless you consistently compete in the World's Strongest Man competition, I think it is safe to say it would be a noticable change.

Josh

More importantly, if you didn't notice that you z-clipped, than you probably are not realizing that you are falling down to the lower bolt if you do fall (i.e.: You will think you are safe, because your just clipped - which is wrong). Not only are you falling farther, but you can deck.

Another tip: If you do need to fix a backclip or a z-clip, and you are gripped out, clip a new draw to the bolt. Clip the rope in the correct way to the new draw. Then clean the previous ('wrong') draw. Don't try to just unclip and reclip, unless you have a good stance and are sure you can. Remember, you are going to have tons of slack out, especially if you are fixing a Z. I saw a newer climber attempt this after backclipping, fumbled around, and fell while the rope was not clipped in. He took a 30+ foot whipper and came REAL close to decking.

Its an extra step, I know. But its not worth decking just to fix a backclip, if there is a safer way to do it. Alternately, if you are backclipped, you can just throw a 2nd draw on the bolt, with the gate opposing the gate on the first draw. The just leave both draws. This assumes you are smart and carrying at least one extra draw. Of course, this won't work on a Z.

A side note. I saw a doofus backclip, realize it, then try to put an extra draw on the bolt (similar to what I just described). But he put the 2nd draw on the exact same way as the 1st one, gate facing the same direction and also backclipped. Of course, this doesn't help much at all.


singin_rocker


Oct 25, 2005, 1:46 PM
Post #37 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 75

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My $.02:

Make sure you learn safety. If you don't feel safe with whoever teaches you, this should be a warning sign. There is lot's to learn about leading outdoors in a less controlled environment that it's important to be sure that you are getting experienced and educated advice instead of some hot-shot joker. You need to learn the importance of dynamic belaying (your partner does for sure) and how to make decisions if you think you are getting in over your head. All things are never equal and you have to be able to do your own problem solving.

That said. Lead climbing is wonderful. Learn to do it well and safely.

Waylan


jdouble


Oct 25, 2005, 2:08 PM
Post #38 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 564

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread is more dangereous than sport climbing.


markc


Oct 25, 2005, 2:16 PM
Post #39 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Another tip: If you do need to fix a backclip or a z-clip, and you are gripped out, clip a new draw to the bolt. Clip the rope in the correct way to the new draw. Then clean the previous ('wrong') draw. Don't try to just unclip and reclip, unless you have a good stance and are sure you can. Remember, you are going to have tons of slack out, especially if you are fixing a Z. I saw a newer climber attempt this after backclipping, fumbled around, and fell while the rope was not clipped in. He took a 30+ foot whipper and came REAL close to decking.

Good advice. There was a recent thread about this very thing. A new climber backclipped on the first bolt of a route and fell on his partner (who was spotting him) while trying to correct the problem.

I have to say I've never climbed anywhere where z-clipping was a real possibility. Bolts have to be placed extremely close together in order to manage it. It's still useful to know what it is for those rare instances where there's an opportunity.


jt512


Oct 25, 2005, 3:14 PM
Post #40 of 85 (10709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
This thread is more dangereous than sport climbing.

It's the webcast edition of the Gumby Show.

-Jay


bigevilgrape


Oct 25, 2005, 3:18 PM
Post #41 of 85 (10711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've seen one zed clip in my life, and if i hadn't just watched him do it I would have done the same thing. If you zed clip you should be able to reach down and unclip the first bolt if you arnt comforitable trying to fix your clip.


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Oct 25, 2005, 6:41 PM
Post #42 of 85 (10711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Z-clipping can be just as bad or worse. If you don´t notice it and your belayer doesn´t either, you can climb right past and, should you fall, your fall factor would increase significantly...


Oh, I can pretty much guarantee that you would notice it. It would suddenly feel like you are carrying a mack truck up with you. So, unless you consistently compete in the World's Strongest Man competition, I think it is safe to say it would be a noticable change.

Backclipping, on the other hand, can go unnoticed, unless you have a very attentive belayer looking for it.

Josh

I agree for the most part. But if you didn´t notice it...


In reply to:
More importantly, if you didn't notice that you z-clipped, than you probably are not realizing that you are falling down to the lower bolt if you do fall (i.e.: You will think you are safe, because your just clipped - which is wrong). Not only are you falling farther, but you can deck.

That´s what I meant to convey, but I was thinking more of falling against the edge of a roof or ledge that you thought you´d cleared...


redpoint73


Oct 25, 2005, 7:32 PM
Post #43 of 85 (10711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2002
Posts: 1717

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I have to say I've never climbed anywhere where z-clipping was a real possibility. Bolts have to be placed extremely close together in order to manage it. It's still useful to know what it is for those rare instances where there's an opportunity.

Bolts tend to get closer together with increasing difficulty. Also, it varies vastly by climbing area. For instance, at Rumney its a definate possibility. In Potrero and Spain, much less so since the bolts are often 15-20 ft. apart.

In reply to:
If you zed clip you should be able to reach down and unclip the first bolt if you arnt comforitable trying to fix your clip.

True.


lux39


Nov 12, 2005, 9:02 PM
Post #44 of 85 (10711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2005
Posts: 29

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
youve been climbing a year and can only TR 5.9. im not trying to be mean but isnt that a little low. i mean ive been climbing about a year and am comfortable climbing mid-high 10's topping out at 11b. i dont know if you are trying harder routes but if you arent i advise you do. work on them if you fall.


as to the question are you good enough to start sport climbing. as long as you feel comfortable on the route and have confidence in gear and belayer then you are ready.

thats mean, rude, ect. everyone gets learns at diffrent rate, no go home and have your mother teach you some manners.
True everyone does learn at different speeds I have seen people after 5 months lead high 5-10 and some after yrs still climb in the 5-9 zone but isint the important thing is to have fun what ever range you are in ....manners manners manners I do agree...


cruzit


Nov 13, 2005, 10:12 PM
Post #45 of 85 (10711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 2, 2003
Posts: 56

Re: Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Some good advice, some bad advice, and some stuff I've yet to figure out.

If you are climbing at the 5.9 level, you are ready to learn to sport or trad lead. I personally climb at best at the 5.10/5.11 level on top-rope (and...yes, I've been climbing for 5 years and that's the best I can do), but I started leading when I was climbing about 5.8 level.

There are many, many great leads at or below 5.8. My personal experience with sport leads is that after you are comfortable and experienced leading, you will be able to sport lead several levels higher than you trad lead. It's not that sport leads are all soft, its just that it's a lot easier to slap a quickdraw in a bolt than to figure out which cam or nut to place in a crack or pocket, then to place it. That is why most trad leaders usually lead several levels lower than what they can comfortably climb.

I sport lead closer to what I can actually climb, but still my best sport lead to date was a 5.9. My hardest trad climb to date was a 5.8 whereupon I was gripped as hell on and almost swore off leading.

Good luck.


Partner oldsalt


Dec 23, 2007, 3:14 AM
Post #46 of 85 (6666 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 919

Re: [cruzit] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Given: People should do searches before starting the 50th thread on a well-worn topic.

I am resurrecting this one because it gets at something that really bugs me about lead climbers as a group. There are actually two groups...

One says that leading is only for climbers with advanced climbing skills, and the other says that leading is only for climbers with advanced technical knowledge, regardless of how hard they climb.

Based upon the way I phrased the above, guess which group I am in.

Some gyms require that you climb at least 5.9 or 5.10 before you are eligible to learn to lead. I was allowed to take the lead class while working on 5.6s and 5.7s.

I see no connection between grade and safety. There are many excellent routes out there for the leading, sport and trad, that are less than 5.9.

I would see connections if a 5.10 fall was inherently more dangerous than a 5.5 fall. I would say that the 5.10 fall was more likely, but many of the 5.4 to 5.7 routes that I have been on offered more dangerous falls - slabby, ledged, etc.

I will say that in my opinion, thinking that only hardmen can (or should) lead is Neanderthal and is associated with penis envy.

Why should someone be able to climb 5.10 before learning to lead (other than an insurance requirement)? Anyone?


justafurnaceman


Dec 24, 2007, 2:37 AM
Post #47 of 85 (6558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2005
Posts: 286

Re: [oldsalt] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's not necessary to be able to climb 5.10+ before lead climbing. I did it when I was climbing 5.9 and I'm teaching my friends who are climbing 5.8.

Again. Lead climb whenever you feel up to the challenge of doing something new.


andrewbanandrew


Dec 24, 2007, 3:07 AM
Post #48 of 85 (6549 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 441

Re: [jt512] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[quote "jt512"][quote]What is backclipping?[/quote]

It's something, the ignorance of which, indicates that you should not be leading.

-Jay[/quote]

hey at least he's askin questions


dj69


Dec 24, 2007, 4:11 AM
Post #49 of 85 (6532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 43

Re: [dilettante] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I started sport climbing (indoors) last jan when i was 14 and TR'ing 5.8. The only trouble i had was finding someone willing to give me a course due to my age.

My advice to you would be to take a course indoors, the gyms a safe place to learn, plus once you can lead, i would suggest that you lead as much as easy stuff as possible just to get a feel for it. Basically if you can lead it and it's in your TR onsight level, then lead it, that way you loose the fear that alot at people have when they first start.

Commitment is what holds me back the most, however my onsight level on lead is slowly getting better, as i am getting more experienced.


snoopy138


Dec 24, 2007, 4:47 AM
Post #50 of 85 (6514 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992

Re: [dj69] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[filler]


snoopy138


Dec 24, 2007, 4:47 AM
Post #51 of 85 (8429 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992

Re: [dj69] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ptftw!

whoo!


spikeddem


Dec 24, 2007, 9:37 AM
Post #52 of 85 (8412 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [snoopy138] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Pretty sure the reason for most gyms requiring a 5.9 (TR) and higher minimum is because usually gyms don't offer climbs below 5.9 for lead. If a 5.8'er learns to lead, then we have a climber with ants in his/her pants.

Now he/she is pushing their climbing abilities AND their technical expertise.

It's not necessarily a bad thing. Learning to fall is definitely important, but between the first and the second clip is a poor time to learn the route is way over your head.


Partner oldsalt


Dec 24, 2007, 8:23 PM
Post #53 of 85 (8391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 919

Re: [spikeddem] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
Pretty sure the reason for most gyms requiring a 5.9 (TR) and higher minimum is because usually gyms don't offer climbs below 5.9 for lead. If a 5.8'er learns to lead, then we have a climber with ants in his/her pants.

Now he/she is pushing their climbing abilities AND their technical expertise.
You are half-way there...

Now explain how leading skills relate to 5.9 climbing.

How do 5.4 - 5.8 routes get led? Is there an ethic requiring that a 5.7 climber may not lead a 5.6 climb?

If you agree that only climbers comfortable at or above 5.9 should be leading, explain the connection.

I have never done a 5.9 TR clean, but I have let many single and multi-pitch routes up to 5.6. Am I fooling myself that I am having fun and being safe?

Make a good point, somebody!


spikeddem


Dec 24, 2007, 11:24 PM
Post #54 of 85 (8361 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [oldsalt] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oldsalt wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Pretty sure the reason for most gyms requiring a 5.9 (TR) and higher minimum is because usually gyms don't offer climbs below 5.9 for lead. If a 5.8'er learns to lead, then we have a climber with ants in his/her pants.

Now he/she is pushing their climbing abilities AND their technical expertise.
You are half-way there...

Only because you cut out half my statement.

In reply to:
Now explain how leading skills relate to 5.9 climbing.

I can't. I can't because there is no direct causation between leading skills and climbing ability.

In reply to:
How do 5.4 - 5.8 routes get led?

The same way 5.14s get led.

In reply to:
Is there an ethic requiring that a 5.7 climber may not lead a 5.6 climb?

Nope. If you are getting this out of my previous post, then I apologize because I may not have been clear enough.

In reply to:
If you agree that only climbers comfortable at or above 5.9 should be leading, explain the connection.

I feel that a new leader should not be leading above their TR level. If one is outside, and they have 5.6-5.8 climbs they are comfortable on, by all means, go ahead and lead!

In reply to:
I have never done a 5.9 TR clean, but I have let many single and multi-pitch routes up to 5.6. Am I fooling myself that I am having fun and being safe?

Nope, not at all. Odds are you have become comfortable leading, so I would say you should shoot for even harder climbs now.

In reply to:
Make a good point, somebody!

Let me know if you have any other points.

The important part of this is that gyms rarely set lead climbs below 5.9 I think it is poor practice to a 5.8 climber learning to lead on a 5.9. A 5.8 climber should learn to lead on a 5.6 or 5.7 It just so happens there are no such lead routes indoors.


lofstromc


Dec 25, 2007, 2:08 AM
Post #55 of 85 (8347 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 528

Re: [spikeddem] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
Do you have a car? Reason being that if you want to sport climb at the levels you mentioned you will need to drive to the New River Gorge to have enough climbs to pick from.
The handfull of climbs for you at Franklin will loose their novelty soon.
If you want, you can climb with me sometime.


(This post was edited by lofstromc on Dec 25, 2007, 2:23 AM)


adrenaline_climber


Dec 25, 2007, 6:07 AM
Post #56 of 85 (8320 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [oldsalt] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Lead climbing is MUCH harder then TR if anyone has led here... which most have i think then you all know this. So... even being able to TR a 5.9 its a different story to lead a 5.9. Mostly becuase its more of a physical challange to hang or sometimes lock off long enough to clip, in which case if your not familiar, could take in the area or 4 seconds or more is a lot of time to chill on a hold which you wouldnt do on TR. Also if your not climbing 5.9 chances are very good that you havnt been climbing long or a lot. either way, Its better to have more experience on the rock while all you have to think about is moving up the wall. On lead you have to worry about back-clips and z-clips and when on an overhang your foot placement around the rope as not to fall upside down potentially hitting their head on the wall hard. those are just a few reasons that most gyms do not offer lead climbing before you are 5.9 competant. In my opinion at that point you shouldnt feel a strong need to climb on lead becuase TR still offers soo many possiblities for the novice climber as well as the fact that they ahve just gotten into the sport. You dont start varsity in school sports becuase you arent ready. is the same not appropriate for climbing as well?

spikeddem: Make a good point, somebody!
Those are many good points if you are wise enough to hear them. The most importnant thing in climbing though is to have fun. if you want to endanger yourself or others by allowing them to do things that they are not comfortable with then thats on your concious and not mine :)


saxfiend


Dec 25, 2007, 4:33 PM
Post #57 of 85 (8299 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [adrenaline_climber] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adrenaline_climber wrote:
Lead climbing is MUCH harder then TR if anyone has led here... which most have i think then you all know this. So... even being able to TR a 5.9 its a different story to lead a 5.9.
I think a lot of people are missing Oldsalt's point, and though you probably didn't mean to do so, your statement above reinforces it: learning lead climbing at the 5.9 level doesn't make sense.

Apart from the most basic movement involved in climbing, toproping in no way prepares you for leading, which involves a whole new set of skills. As you pointed out in your post, you're not just climbing anymore; you're also dealing with hanging out long enough to clip, clipping correctly, avoiding the leg behind the rope, etc.

It seems far more sensible to learn these new skills on a route that's so easy and/or juggy that you don't really need to worry about falling. By the time the new leader gets on 5.9 and harder routes, he or she has all this new stuff internalized.

JL


adrenaline_climber


Dec 25, 2007, 8:27 PM
Post #58 of 85 (8283 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Where are you going to find sub 5.8 or 5.9 leads in a gym or even outdoors for that matter? Theres not any bolted routes below 5.9 that ive seen and ive climbed many places. As well in gyms its not smart for gyms to set sub 5.9 lead routes becuase nobody will get on them. By the point that people should be learning to lead 5.9 should be juggy and huge and not much of a problem... thus they start lead routes at 5.9 becuase its the step up from a ladder climb but not technical enough to trip up anybody that is even 10a confident.


saxfiend


Dec 25, 2007, 10:05 PM
Post #59 of 85 (8275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [adrenaline_climber] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adrenaline_climber wrote:
Theres not any bolted routes below 5.9 that ive seen and ive climbed many places.
Ever been to Foster Falls? There's routes there at 5.8 and below -- not many, but enough to learn on, anyway.

adrenaline_climber wrote:
As well in gyms its not smart for gyms to set sub 5.9 lead routes becuase nobody will get on them.
Nobody, that is, except people who want to learn how to lead. I got my lead course on 5.7 routes in my gym. I haven't been to Adrenaline, but other Atlanta gyms I've climbed at have lead routes below the 5.9 level.

I don't know why it's so hard to understand the idea that when you're learning a new skill, you start off on something easy and work your way up. Nobody starts off toproping 5.9 or above, so it's ridiculous to require that they start leading at that level.

JL


adrenaline_climber


Dec 25, 2007, 10:25 PM
Post #60 of 85 (8268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The whole idea is that when youve been climbing long enough that you can competently climb a 5.9 without a problem it shows you have enough experience on the rocks not to worry about the motion or the height or anything that you would when starting off on a TR so when you hop on lead you only worry about the new techniques of lead climbing. The thought is generally that if you cant learn to lead because a 5.9 is too difficult then you shouldnt be leading in the first place. that is what the gyms are saying its not difficult to understand. Once your comfortable enough on 5.9 to do it many times over and over and without problem youre ready to start leading. Most people walk into gyms and can already climb a 5.8. does that mean that they are ready to lead? no becuase they are not comfortable with the idea of climbing in the first place and the usual 5.9 minimum level is a safeguard to try and prevent people from getting sketched out more then they should becuase they still aren't comfortable on TR's. Its not to be mean but ive seen my share of people, while working at a gym for 2 years, to try and lead when they cant even climb well enough to know not to lock off to clip. Thus they should TR some more to get enough technique to know that you use straight arms or that you can even use your legs. And it makes our job easier becuase we know that people flailing around on the 5.9 leads are either not ready or not informed and thus we can teach them and not let them doing stupidass things like try to lead when they have only TR'ed a few times before and dont know the rules of the game as of thus far.


saxfiend


Dec 25, 2007, 10:48 PM
Post #61 of 85 (8274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [adrenaline_climber] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adrenaline_climber wrote:
The thought is generally that if you cant learn to lead because a 5.9 is too difficult then you shouldnt be leading in the first place. that is what the gyms are saying its not difficult to understand.
You're right, it's not difficult to understand, but it's still just nonsense, sort of like requiring someone to know how to ride a bicycle before they can learn to drive a car. Fortunately, not all gyms have this unreasonable attitude.

I see from your profile that you're a 5.11d sport leader. So how come you're only leading 5.8 trad? Because trad is a whole new ball game, that's why. Just like sport leading is a whole different ball game compared with toproping.

JL


CaptainPolution


Dec 25, 2007, 11:10 PM
Post #62 of 85 (8265 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2007
Posts: 330

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the gym I work at requires the person to lead 5.10 before taking a class. People who climb 5.8 in the gym honestly have no idea what they are doing. 5.10 at my gym is close to 9's. you need to learn to crawl before you walk and understand climbing before you lead. thats the way it is, deal with it.


saxfiend


Dec 25, 2007, 11:15 PM
Post #63 of 85 (8264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [CaptainPolution] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CaptainPolution wrote:
thats the way it is, deal with it.
saxfiend wrote:
Fortunately, not all gyms have this unreasonable attitude.


CaptainPolution


Dec 25, 2007, 11:46 PM
Post #64 of 85 (8254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2007
Posts: 330

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saxfiend wrote:
CaptainPolution wrote:
thats the way it is, deal with it.
saxfiend wrote:
Fortunately, not all gyms have this unreasonable attitude.

how is that unreasonable?

what the point of teaching someone to lead if they arent even competent climbers? by competent I mean 5.8 is pretty damn easy, like a ladder. why add another thing to learn to someone who still has a lot of basics to learn? It's setting them up for failure which in turn will make them not like the sport.

on second thought, go ahead and teach 5.8 climbers to lead so they quit the sport and leave more stuff for others to climb


adrenaline_climber


Dec 26, 2007, 12:38 AM
Post #65 of 85 (8249 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [CaptainPolution] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

exactly the point ive been saying like 5 times now. neways im done with this thread ppl just want to bitch around here.


CaptainPolution


Dec 26, 2007, 12:45 AM
Post #66 of 85 (8248 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2007
Posts: 330

Re: [adrenaline_climber] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adrenaline_climber wrote:
exactly the point ive been saying like 5 times now. neways im done with this thread ppl just want to bitch around here.

it's more fun to bitch plus we are geniuses


roseraie


Dec 26, 2007, 1:40 AM
Post #67 of 85 (8232 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2003
Posts: 439

Re: [CaptainPolution] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CaptainPolution wrote:
saxfiend wrote:
CaptainPolution wrote:
thats the way it is, deal with it.
saxfiend wrote:
Fortunately, not all gyms have this unreasonable attitude.

how is that unreasonable?

what the point of teaching someone to lead if they arent even competent climbers? by competent I mean 5.8 is pretty damn easy, like a ladder. why add another thing to learn to someone who still has a lot of basics to learn? It's setting them up for failure which in turn will make them not like the sport.

on second thought, go ahead and teach 5.8 climbers to lead so they quit the sport and leave more stuff for others to climb

I see from your profile that you've onsighted Bear's Reach twice. Was it like a ladder?

I think, Captain Pollution, that what you're failing to grasp is that physical climbing ability in a gym does not always translate to whether or not the person is qualified to lead. There are plenty of badass old alpine climbers who are not currently capable of overhanging gym 5.9.

I'm getting bored of this thread. Someone make a NEW argument!


CaptainPolution


Dec 26, 2007, 1:57 AM
Post #68 of 85 (8227 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2007
Posts: 330

Re: [roseraie] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roseraie wrote:
CaptainPolution wrote:
saxfiend wrote:
CaptainPolution wrote:
thats the way it is, deal with it.
saxfiend wrote:
Fortunately, not all gyms have this unreasonable attitude.

how is that unreasonable?

what the point of teaching someone to lead if they arent even competent climbers? by competent I mean 5.8 is pretty damn easy, like a ladder. why add another thing to learn to someone who still has a lot of basics to learn? It's setting them up for failure which in turn will make them not like the sport.

on second thought, go ahead and teach 5.8 climbers to lead so they quit the sport and leave more stuff for others to climb

I see from your profile that you've onsighted Bear's Reach twice. Was it like a ladder?

I think, Captain Pollution, that what you're failing to grasp is that physical climbing ability in a gym does not always translate to whether or not the person is qualified to lead. There are plenty of badass old alpine climbers who are not currently capable of overhanging gym 5.9.

I'm getting bored of this thread. Someone make a NEW argument!

sorry I meant to say 5.8 gym not outside. im basing the lead learning on gym climbing. im way too lazy to even write anything more

oh and bears reach SUCKS by the way. worst route I have ever climbed, totally different than a sport route since its on gear, go figure. bears reach has nothing to do with sport climbing and yes it was like a ladder, a windy ladder with all of your pro behind flakes. super fun, not.

its not the grade you can climb its the competency of the climber. I was trying to say that it is going to be harder to lead if you dont have the fundamentals down. I hate seeing people learning outside and seeing the extreme danger they could be in. but whatever I dont care, I dont climb with people who cant lead anyways.


saxfiend


Dec 26, 2007, 4:48 AM
Post #69 of 85 (8202 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [roseraie] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roseraie wrote:
I see from your profile that you've onsighted Bear's Reach twice. Was it like a ladder?
Heh, watching the hard dudes who work in climbing gyms get out on real rock can be very entertaining. Too bad it doesn't happen very often.

JL
CaptainPolution wrote:
[a climbing gym is] a shitty place to work. too many N00BS who think they are the shit but are big vagina's in the real


Partner oldsalt


Dec 26, 2007, 4:57 AM
Post #70 of 85 (8194 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 919

Re: [CaptainPolution] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CaptainPolution wrote:
its not the grade you can climb its the competency of the climber.

Thank you!

You said it, and maybe don't realize it. Sax understands and a few others above.

The idea that grade translates to competency is bull sh*t!

Competency = safe rope management, belaying skills, anchor building, etc. It means doing everything the right way, every time. It comes from experience, not difficulty level.

This thread has drawn some interesting responses, even if I disagree with some of them. It is relevent because the original misunderstanding still exists.

Only competent climbers should lead, and I know climbers who can TR 5.10 who are not competent to lead at any grade.

I have caught my partner on some awesome falls at high grades at or near his limit, and miles beyond my limit. I am a safe lead belayer because I am a safe lead climber at my own level, and I understand first hand what is happening and why.

It makes no sense to deny competent climbers the access to leading just because they don't climb 5.9 or higher. I'm not sure that any opinions have actually changed due to these exchanges, but I was hoping that some would.


spikeddem


Dec 26, 2007, 9:15 AM
Post #71 of 85 (8185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [oldsalt] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oldsalt wrote:
It makes no sense to deny competent climbers the access to leading just because they don't climb 5.9 or higher. I'm not sure that any opinions have actually changed due to these exchanges, but I was hoping that some would.

$$$$$$$$$$

Outdoors: Bolts+Time.
Indoors: Paid employees for route setting.

Makes sense to me. Is it fair? Well, that's a different question.


CaptainPolution


Dec 26, 2007, 11:59 PM
Post #72 of 85 (8124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 10, 2007
Posts: 330

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saxfiend wrote:
roseraie wrote:
I see from your profile that you've onsighted Bear's Reach twice. Was it like a ladder?
Heh, watching the hard dudes who work in climbing gyms get out on real rock can be very entertaining. Too bad it doesn't happen very often.

JL
CaptainPolution wrote:
[a climbing gym is] a shitty place to work. too many N00BS who think they are the shit but are big vagina's in the real

LOL at the fact that most people who work in climbing gym never touch real rock just plastic, EWWWW!


adrenaline_climber


Dec 27, 2007, 12:23 PM
Post #73 of 85 (8096 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 38

Re: [CaptainPolution] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i get out every weekend tnx. but i do agree most ppl i work with dun even climb in gyms nemore cuz they r dumb. I climb in the gym to train and becuase its still climbing. when you think about it climbing is climbing whether its trees or rocks or plastic ill probably enjoy it ^^


saxfiend


Dec 30, 2007, 9:49 PM
Post #74 of 85 (8039 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [adrenaline_climber] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, the weather was crappy for outdoor climbing yesterday, so a friend and I decided to check out your climbing gym. It's really a nice facility with a lot of variety.

I have to include the quote below for sheer irony:

adrenaline_climber wrote:
Where are you going to find sub 5.8 or 5.9 leads in a gym or even outdoors for that matter? Theres not any bolted routes below 5.9 that ive seen and ive climbed many places. As well in gyms its not smart for gyms to set sub 5.9 lead routes becuase nobody will get on them.

This makes me wonder if you work at the same Adrenaline gym as the one I went to. There were a bunch of 5.8 and 5.9 lead routes there, and they were lots of fun (I believe our warm-up lead was a 5.7). Being the pathetic geezer that I am, the best I could manage was a 5.10a, but I did lead it clean.

Strangely enough, no one asked how hard my friend and I climb when we checked out a lead rope. We didn't even have to take a lead test.

It was nice to find that Adrenaline was not nearly as uptight as I would have assumed from the above post. It was a great change of pace from my regular gym too.

JL


jgloporto


Jan 11, 2008, 4:38 PM
Post #75 of 85 (7931 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2006
Posts: 5522

Re: [dc_climber23] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[quote "dc_climber23"]I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help[/quote]

You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.


jgloporto


Jan 11, 2008, 4:40 PM
Post #76 of 85 (5153 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2006
Posts: 5522

Re: [jgloporto] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jgloporto wrote:
dc_climber23 wrote:
I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help

You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.

Wow, did I ever cheesetit that one.


carabiner96


Jan 12, 2008, 4:42 AM
Post #77 of 85 (5129 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610

Re: [jgloporto] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jgloporto wrote:
jgloporto wrote:
dc_climber23 wrote:
I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help

You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.

Wow, did I ever cheesetit that one.

cheesetitter.


jgloporto


Jan 12, 2008, 3:33 PM
Post #78 of 85 (5115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2006
Posts: 5522

Re: [carabiner96] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
jgloporto wrote:
jgloporto wrote:
dc_climber23 wrote:
I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help

You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.

Wow, did I ever cheesetit that one.

cheesetitter.

I DCT'd atleast.

You need to give me the link to the thread where you got the new sig... So that I may point and laugh at this marde.


jgloporto


Jan 12, 2008, 3:36 PM
Post #79 of 85 (5114 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2006
Posts: 5522

Re: [jgloporto] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jgloporto wrote:
jgloporto wrote:
dc_climber23 wrote:
I've been toproping for about a year and am loving it, although I really only get to go outdoors about once every two weeks. I'm currently climbing in the Great Falls area of Northern VA/ DC, but am interested in getting into sport.

How good does one need to be to start sport? I would say I climb comfortably about a 5.8, maybe a 5.9 on a good day.

Is that too low grade to get into sport climbing? I'm not trying to hurt myself here!

Thanks for the help

You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.

Wow, did I ever cheesetit that one.


Woot! (Belated)


jdefazio


Jan 12, 2008, 4:12 PM
Post #80 of 85 (5108 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 228

Re: [jgloporto] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jgloporto wrote:
You should be able to lead 11 sport routes before you should start sport climbing. I just did the other night so now I'm ready.

11 routes, huh? That must take a while. Wink


DrexelTech


Jan 12, 2008, 4:23 PM
Post #81 of 85 (5103 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 12, 2008
Posts: 2

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saxfiend wrote:
It was nice to find that Adrenaline was not nearly as uptight as I would have assumed from the above post. It was a great change of pace from my regular gym too.

JL

I just started setting routes for Adrenaline, and the great atmosphere is a primary reason why I was so excited to be involved with this gym. As you saw, there is a LOT of lead terrain at Adrenaline, both lead-only overhanging areas (with few routes below 5.9), and TR areas that can also be lead. The TR areas seem to usually have quite a few easy routes on them, and you can certainly lead them no problemo. Glad you enjoyed the gym, and if you're ever back on a weekday and see a fat guy on a rope with a bucket of holds, it's probably me - give me a shout!


saxfiend


Jan 12, 2008, 11:27 PM
Post #82 of 85 (5083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208

Re: [DrexelTech] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

DrexelTech wrote:
As you saw, there is a LOT of lead terrain at Adrenaline
Indeed! Much more than at my home gym (wish I didn't live an hour's drive away from Adrenaline). My friend and I had a great time, and I'll definitely look you up next time I'm there.

Did you set the overhanging white 5.9 jughaul that's near the front desk? That was a gas to lead!

JL


DrexelTech


Jan 13, 2008, 12:37 AM
Post #83 of 85 (5069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 12, 2008
Posts: 2

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I can't take credit for that 5.9 route - when I said I JUST started setting there, I meant it literally. I started last week. A lot of that section was stripped and re-set last week, so there are some cool new routes up, but I think the 9 is still there.


NoMoCouch


Jan 13, 2008, 2:39 AM
Post #84 of 85 (5059 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 60

Re: [saxfiend] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saxfiend wrote:
adrenaline_climber wrote:
Lead climbing is MUCH harder then TR if anyone has led here... which most have i think then you all know this. So... even being able to TR a 5.9 its a different story to lead a 5.9.
I think a lot of people are missing Oldsalt's point, and though you probably didn't mean to do so, your statement above reinforces it: learning lead climbing at the 5.9 level doesn't make sense.

Apart from the most basic movement involved in climbing, toproping in no way prepares you for leading, which involves a whole new set of skills. As you pointed out in your post, you're not just climbing anymore; you're also dealing with hanging out long enough to clip, clipping correctly, avoiding the leg behind the rope, etc.

It seems far more sensible to learn these new skills on a route that's so easy and/or juggy that you don't really need to worry about falling. By the time the new leader gets on 5.9 and harder routes, he or she has all this new stuff internalized.

JL

This is a very good point. Gyms serve a purpose for me. They are my training ground since I cannot jump in the car every other day and travel to a real crag. I use it to learn movement and to gain strength. The very sad things is, I am scouring my guide book, just purchased, looking for a sport route or two that I would feel comfortable leading (5.6 5.7) so that I can have a chance at climbing any of the sport hung routes in the gym. Shocked

Weird huh?


amikros


Jan 13, 2008, 8:29 PM
Post #85 of 85 (5027 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 2006
Posts: 109

Re: [dc_climber23] Skill Level for Sport Climbing? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey DC,

So like you, I've been climbing for a little longer than a year now and I only just started leading this past fall.

The folks that I climb with were occasionally contemplating killing me... I was able to physically lead...I knew how to lead (ie, no back-clipping etc), but I just did not think I could do it. I'd look at a .6 and get all nervous and my palms would get all sweaty just over the idea of leading the route...meanwhile I'd see a 5.10c and jump at the chance to follow it...

Mentally, I just could not do it. I had this huge fear stuck in the back of my throat and the whole idea of leading (falling) scared me to death. And then, for some reason, one day, a friend was like, "hey do you want to lead today?" and I was like "uhhh....yea, that sounds good." (Do note, I was nervous as hell, but I was comfortable with the idea of leading-finally)

It sounds like you are not too different from me...I was very cautious. Still am. So I would suggest having a knowledge of how to clip properly and how your anchor should look, which, (not trying to be offensive) by the looks of your comments, you do not have extensively. Keep being cautious. Ask questions. Your knowledge and your comfort level are the two things that are going to determine whether you can lead sport routes safely or not, (IMO).


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Sport Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook