Forums: Community: Campground:
The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.)
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next page Last page  View All


caughtinside


Dec 12, 2007, 11:14 PM
Post #526 of 615 (2071 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

no mercy.

And PTFTW!!!


Partner wideguy


Dec 13, 2007, 12:13 AM
Post #527 of 615 (2067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15045

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

mturner wrote:
Agreed.

Next topic:
Do the Pats show the Jets any mercy? (thus showing that they do have a smidge bit of class)

The Patriots will execute their gameplan. Period. if the Jets don't have a good enough counter plan, they will find themselves on the wrong side of a wide margin. All the local sports guys who have talked to Belechick say the same thing. He has nothing to prove. He has lead his team to 13-0, playoffs, first round bye. And Mangini and the Jets will be playing golf in January.

Like Ditka said, it's not the Patriots job to "go easy", it's the opponent's job to stop them.


mturner


Dec 17, 2007, 2:52 AM
Post #528 of 615 (2056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [wideguy] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Not exactly dominating.

And what the fuck Baltimore - the Dolphins?! Way to ruin all the fun. I thought blowing the New England game was bad...you've hit a new low.


Partner wideguy


Dec 17, 2007, 3:00 AM
Post #529 of 615 (2055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15045

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

mturner wrote:
Not exactly dominating.

And what the fuck Baltimore - the Dolphins?! Way to ruin all the fun. I thought blowing the New England game was bad...you've hit a new low.

Take away the 7 points from the blocked punt, look at time of possession, first downs, and pretty much any other statistic, and the game was not as close as it looked.

The thing that has been exposed repeatedly in the last three weeks was the Patriots lack of running game. Today was sleet, snow, rain and 20 MPH winds and the Patriots passing game suffered accordingly. But the did rush Maroney for over 100 so that may be a glimmer of hope.


caughtinside


Dec 17, 2007, 3:05 AM
Post #530 of 615 (2052 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

mturner wrote:
Not exactly dominating.

And what the fuck Baltimore - the Dolphins?! Way to ruin all the fun. I thought blowing the New England game was bad...you've hit a new low.

The dolphins won. So much for my dream of the defeated season. Unsure


mturner


Dec 17, 2007, 3:18 AM
Post #531 of 615 (2052 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [wideguy] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

wideguy wrote:
mturner wrote:
Not exactly dominating.

And what the fuck Baltimore - the Dolphins?! Way to ruin all the fun. I thought blowing the New England game was bad...you've hit a new low.

Take away the 7 points from the blocked punt, look at time of possession, first downs, and pretty much any other statistic, and the game was not as close as it looked.

Not as close in what way? In that the Jets kicked themselves in the foot so many times, that they just as easily could have won? And they both had scores off block punts...granted the Pats was an all-exciting 1 yard run.

Here's some stats:
First downs - 13 Jets, 16 Pats
Net Yards - 236 Jets, 265 Pats
Time of Possession - 26:23 Jets, 33:37 Pats

Not exactly dominating. I'd say those stats suggest an even closer game than 10 points.

But as long as we're doing what if's...Take away the sloppy INT at the beginning, the ONLY offensive touchdown that the Patriots had today which was off a blocked punt...then the Jets easily walk away with a win today. But hey, we've been through this before and that's why they play the game. Nice job Pats, you can finally rest knowing you're a slightly better team than the 3-11 Jets...great job!


dr_feelgood


Dec 17, 2007, 4:10 AM
Post #532 of 615 (2044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [caughtinside] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
mturner wrote:
Not exactly dominating.

And what the fuck Baltimore - the Dolphins?! Way to ruin all the fun. I thought blowing the New England game was bad...you've hit a new low.

The dolphins won. So much for my dream of the defeated season. Unsure

Talk about some bullshit. I'm almost as upset about that as i would be if the pats lost...


jakedatc


Dec 17, 2007, 4:21 AM
Post #533 of 615 (2042 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

They beat the Jets. Mission complete.

do you HONESTLY think the Pats are only *slightly* better than the Jets? 14-0 3-11 the Pat's beat them in both meetings in 2 different weather conditions in 2 different styles.
Let's compare their similar opponents..

Vs Steelers Jets win by 2.. Pats by 21
Vs Bengals Jets win by 7 Pats by 21
Vs Dolphins Jets win by 3 Pats by 21
Vs Bills Jets Lose by 3 and 10 Pats win by 31
Vs Cowboys Jets LOST by 31 Pats won by 21
Vs Philly Jets Lost by 7 Pats won by 3
Vs Skins Jets Lost by 3 Pats won by uhh 45
Vs Browns Jets Lost by 6 Pats won by 17
Vs Ravens Jets Lost by 7 Pats won by 3

i might have missed some but it's pretty clear

oh and we crushed them by 34 the first time and 10 this time..

slightly better? Stfu lol

you're like Mangina calling time outs when the other team is kneeling on the ball.. you got BEAT.. move on


(This post was edited by jakedatc on Dec 17, 2007, 4:25 AM)


reno


Dec 17, 2007, 4:25 AM
Post #534 of 615 (2038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Enter the apologists and excuse makers.

The Pats have had several lucky breaks this season. This, in addition to the games they've played with skill and determination, have given them a great deal of success.

Sure, they're good. But they're lucky, too. Without that, they're just another 10-4 team.


mturner


Dec 17, 2007, 3:49 PM
Post #535 of 615 (2030 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
do you HONESTLY think the Pats are only *slightly* better than the Jets? 14-0 3-11 the Pat's beat them in both meetings in 2 different weather conditions in 2 different styles.
Let's compare their similar opponents..

You're the one that wants all the excuses to stop and just look at how the game was played. Bottom line, yesterday the Jets were only slightly worse than the Pats. I don't care about all the other games, I'm only talking about yesterday. Tom Brady put up worse numbers than Chad Pennington for chrissake and after all the talk about putting up 70 points, I think that deserves some credit.

And as for the two different weather conditions...fine, more power to you. I hope you feel confident enough in your performance against the 3-11 Jets AT HOME to play another snow game against the Colts, Chargers, Steelers, or even the Jags. 14-0 or 0-14, I like the chances of the Pats losing in the playoffs!


jakedatc


Dec 18, 2007, 1:15 AM
Post #536 of 615 (2018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Brady's numbers were down but Moronney's were up.. so for all the people that said the pats don't have a running game can now see that we do have one.. we just don't need to use it all the time.

right now it looks like we'll play either the chargers or the jags.. i think we'll be ok


mturner


Dec 18, 2007, 3:14 PM
Post #537 of 615 (2006 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Brady's numbers were down but Moronney's were up.. so for all the people that said the pats don't have a running game can now see that we do have one.. we just don't need to use it all the time.

right now it looks like we'll play either the chargers or the jags.. i think we'll be ok

Ha! You had "a running game" against the Jets...who are ranked 30th in the league in run defense!! 30th!!! What's more, the Pats only had 131 total rush yards which is actually less than the average amount the Jets give up. But hey, I'm sure you'll have just as good of luck running against the 5th ranked Jags' run defense in the playoffs.


jakedatc


Dec 19, 2007, 12:48 PM
Post #538 of 615 (1993 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Pats are ranked 12th in rush yds per game

but.. ranked 1st in points, total yards, and Passing yards oh.. and WINS

we ran on a team when we had to .. folks on the radio have been bitching for weeks that if we were stuck in crap weather we couldn't run it at all and would fall apart.

jags are 5th in run defense eh? too bad they are 25TH in pass defense. sounds like a good day for 81

chargers.. 22nd in pass defense 16th for the run.. could be an short trip to the play offs

Steelers are 3rd in pass defense and 3rd in run defense and guess what... smoked them 34-13.

:yawn: keep telling me how much the Pat's suck next week when miami gets ruined


redpointron


Dec 19, 2007, 1:58 PM
Post #539 of 615 (1992 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 1170

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
:yawn: keep telling me how much the Pat's suck next week when miami gets ruined

at 1-13, i don't think they need to wait till next week for anyone to consider them ruined.Wink


caughtinside


Dec 19, 2007, 10:29 PM
Post #540 of 615 (1984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [redpointron] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Is the Big Tuna dolphin safe???


jakedatc


Dec 24, 2007, 1:02 AM
Post #541 of 615 (1979 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [redpointron] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hey.. that momentum helped them alot! 'fins scored once :)


mturner


Dec 24, 2007, 2:07 AM
Post #542 of 615 (1972 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [jakedatc] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Hey.. that momentum helped them alot! 'fins scored once :)

It's all good. The Pats D helped me win the championship game of my fantasy league. CoolSly


dr_feelgood


Dec 24, 2007, 3:36 AM
Post #543 of 615 (1962 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Poor buffalo. They were doing so good, and then they went and played against the wind in the last quarter.


mturner


Dec 24, 2007, 7:46 AM
Post #544 of 615 (1953 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [dr_feelgood] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Speaking of teams to feel sorry for:

I was watching the Raiders get crushed today and on one drive their defense had three personal fouls for unsportsmanlike conduct ON ONE PLAY! They ejected Warren Sapp and I'm sure some fines will be enforced. So the Jags got 45 yards for sitting back and watching the Raiders self-destruct. The weird thing was on the next play the Raiders intercepted the ball. Not really sure why I'm posting this but I thought it was pretty funny.


Partner blonde_loves_bolts


Dec 24, 2007, 8:08 AM
Post #545 of 615 (1949 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 2287

Re: [mturner] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

That's because the Raiders are the most pitiable team in the NFL, ironically ever since Mt. Davis himself coined "Just win, baby." Going to post the worst defeat in decades, even though your team's already sunk to 15-48 these past few seasons? Pull a more violent, NFL-version of Michelle Wie and get your entire defense to try and get themselves ejected. If you can't win, you at least apparently have to find another way to keep that freak show known as the Raider Nation paying for season tickets... or at least willing to shell out $20 for a pass to sit in the Coliseum parking lot and get drunk, crunk, and fuuuucked up during games.

On another note, what would really make my offseason would be if Warren Sapp managed to asphyxiate Trent Dilfer with one of Robert Gallery's weaves so that Shaun Hill can stay on as starting QB so my Niners can have a winning season next year. Assuming no coaches jump ship, Norv Turner style.
Ah... one can dream.


dr_feelgood


Dec 24, 2007, 1:56 PM
Post #546 of 615 (1944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [blonde_loves_bolts] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

how was the woodwork you were hiding in?


Partner wideguy


Dec 24, 2007, 3:04 PM
Post #547 of 615 (1940 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15045

Re: [dr_feelgood] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
how was the woodwork you were hiding in?

I thought she was you.... don't think we've ever seen you both post at the same time before.
Tongue


dr_feelgood


Dec 24, 2007, 4:39 PM
Post #548 of 615 (1936 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [wideguy] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

wideguy wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
how was the woodwork you were hiding in?

I thought she was you.... don't think we've ever seen you both post at the same time before.
Tongue

Too bad i am a brunette.


Partner blonde_loves_bolts


Dec 24, 2007, 6:26 PM
Post #549 of 615 (1932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 2287

Re: [wideguy] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

wideguy wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
how was the woodwork you were hiding in?

I thought she was you.... don't think we've ever seen you both post at the same time before.
Tongue

I think I will take that as a compliment Tongue

Things are good, no real reason for being MIA other than my typical work overload. Although lately I have become more of a gym boulderer... *cringe*

How are things here? Did I miss anything?

One more note to keep this thread related:

FUCK YOU, NFL NETWORK!!!


mturner


Dec 24, 2007, 6:35 PM
Post #550 of 615 (1931 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [blonde_loves_bolts] The Official rc.com 2007 NFL Thread (not affiliated with the BET. All rights reserved.) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

blonde_loves_bolts wrote:
Did I miss anything?

Not really.

The Pats are cheaters in everyone's eyes except their loyal fans who will forever hark on their success.

Michael Vick ruined his life.

The Fins kinda suck hard.

The Pack are a pleasant surprise.

That's bout it.

First page Previous page 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook