Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Your least favorite gear
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All


Lazlo


Nov 14, 2009, 5:17 PM
Post #51 of 181 (6715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079

Re: [Lazlo] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

or these buckles;



caughtinside


Nov 14, 2009, 6:08 PM
Post #52 of 181 (6693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [tomtom] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

tomtom wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
what a retard! Grigris and autolocking harness belts are two of the best things going.

For Sport climbers, maybe. Those and slippers so that they don't have to remember how to tie their shoes.

But if you've ever had to put on your harness with your crampons or skis on or add rain pants while tied in, you'll discover the 'issue' with autolocking harnesses.

There's no shortage of trad out there where you don't need crampons, skis or rain pants, hardman. If you're doing special typhoon mountaineering, you might need some specialized gear for that.

And now you're bagging on slippers? THose are the best shoes to use at my favorite sport-trad area, the creek.

And the grigri is great for trad too.


coastal_climber


Nov 14, 2009, 6:46 PM
Post #53 of 181 (6669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542

Re: [caughtinside] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
tomtom wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
what a retard! Grigris and autolocking harness belts are two of the best things going.

For Sport climbers, maybe. Those and slippers so that they don't have to remember how to tie their shoes.

But if you've ever had to put on your harness with your crampons or skis on or add rain pants while tied in, you'll discover the 'issue' with autolocking harnesses.

There's no shortage of trad out there where you don't need crampons, skis or rain pants, hardman. If you're doing special typhoon mountaineering, you might need some specialized gear for that.

And now you're bagging on slippers? THose are the best shoes to use at my favorite sport-trad area, the creek.

And the grigri is great for trad too.

Ah yes, the world according to caughtinside...


caughtinside


Nov 14, 2009, 7:21 PM
Post #54 of 181 (6648 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [coastal_climber] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

coastal_climber wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
tomtom wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
what a retard! Grigris and autolocking harness belts are two of the best things going.

For Sport climbers, maybe. Those and slippers so that they don't have to remember how to tie their shoes.

But if you've ever had to put on your harness with your crampons or skis on or add rain pants while tied in, you'll discover the 'issue' with autolocking harnesses.

There's no shortage of trad out there where you don't need crampons, skis or rain pants, hardman. If you're doing special typhoon mountaineering, you might need some specialized gear for that.

And now you're bagging on slippers? THose are the best shoes to use at my favorite sport-trad area, the creek.

And the grigri is great for trad too.

Ah yes, the world according to caughtinside...

Yep. I actually enjoy your posts in a twisted way there cam. Because you consistently say amazingly dumb shit.


Partner camhead


Nov 14, 2009, 7:27 PM
Post #55 of 181 (6640 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [caughtinside] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
coastal_climber wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
tomtom wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
what a retard! Grigris and autolocking harness belts are two of the best things going.

For Sport climbers, maybe. Those and slippers so that they don't have to remember how to tie their shoes.

But if you've ever had to put on your harness with your crampons or skis on or add rain pants while tied in, you'll discover the 'issue' with autolocking harnesses.

There's no shortage of trad out there where you don't need crampons, skis or rain pants, hardman. If you're doing special typhoon mountaineering, you might need some specialized gear for that.

And now you're bagging on slippers? THose are the best shoes to use at my favorite sport-trad area, the creek.

And the grigri is great for trad too.

Ah yes, the world according to caughtinside...

Yep. I actually enjoy your posts in a twisted way there cam. Because you consistently say amazingly dumb shit.

Hey CI, could you not call him cam? That's too close to my name. Call him something like "fucktard" or something like that.

Oh, and I don't set foot outside my back door without a gri gri. Those things are awesome.


sungam


Nov 14, 2009, 8:42 PM
Post #56 of 181 (6604 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [coastal_climber] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Coastal climber doesn't understand that different gear is better for different stuff.
Apparently he doesn't know how easy it is to undo the petzl ziplocks to put the harness on when you forgot and put the crampons on first.


coastal_climber


Nov 14, 2009, 9:11 PM
Post #57 of 181 (6590 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542

Re: [sungam] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Its called personal preference.


sungam


Nov 14, 2009, 9:25 PM
Post #58 of 181 (6582 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [coastal_climber] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

coastal_climber wrote:
Its called personal preference.
Oh, I see... but when Klown says it it's "the world according to caughtinside"?
I'm not hating on you or anything, just saying.


coastal_climber


Nov 14, 2009, 9:29 PM
Post #59 of 181 (6579 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542

Re: [sungam] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
coastal_climber wrote:
Its called personal preference.
Oh, I see... but when Klown says it it's "the world according to caughtinside"?
I'm not hating on you or anything, just saying.

Notice that I didn't start this particular dick-measuring session.


qwert


Nov 15, 2009, 10:53 AM
Post #60 of 181 (6463 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394

Re: [coastal_climber] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Backt to topic:

I actually dont have something least favorite, as in "i really hate that crap", but i would say the camp bolo nuts rank rather high in that regard.

Long ago i thought that would be a good idea, for those sport routes where you probably need a nut or two, so you dont have to buy/ carry a whole set.
Turns out if you need two nuts, the second one you need is always the most important one, and the one thats hanging on the first nut.
also a pain to rack, and you always need the nut on the other side of the side you grabbed it first.

I think if i ever need some more nuts, i simply cut away one nut, to have a normal one.

qwert


shoo


Nov 15, 2009, 1:56 PM
Post #61 of 181 (6432 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501

Re: [maldaly] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
acorneau wrote:
shoo wrote:
maldaly wrote:
Cordalettes are the most useless, overused piece of gear out there. For me anyway.

Mal

You think that's useless, you should try the alpine equalizer. . .Shocked

Ouch! Crazy

Unfortunately I have to agree with Shoo. I got the smaller one as a gift and used it once, maybe twice. Been sitting in the "unused" corner of the gear bag ever since.
Unsure

Ouch is right!

I dunno though... I kinda like it for the local TR area. Sling 3 trees, clip the AE and huck it over the edge (usually with the Omega D lockers mentioned above at the PP). The auto-adjusting makes it easy to just flip it over/around something to get on another route without re-rigging, which is nice given how short the cliff is.

My apologies to Mal and the crew at Trango. That one came out a lot snarkier than I intended.

Mal puts together some pretty sweet gear, some of which has become staples on my harness for pure awesomeness (I would name them, but that's another thread). While I don't personally have any use for the alpine equalizer, I could see applications for which it might be a reasonable thing to carry. It's just not going to make the cut for my personal gear sling.


(This post was edited by shoo on Nov 15, 2009, 1:58 PM)


dbogardus


Nov 15, 2009, 2:31 PM
Post #62 of 181 (6422 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2009
Posts: 148

Re: [moose_droppings] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
Multi colored spandex pants.

You sir, have no style.


dolphja


Nov 15, 2009, 3:15 PM
Post #63 of 181 (6408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2001
Posts: 298

Re: [petsfed] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post



the petzl stop can become the petzl DECK if you aren't careful with it. it will not lock off automatically if something is obstructing the trigger. if you use it, always use a backup. i watched someone freefall 25 feet on this thing yesterday and shattered the bones in their feet with compound factures.


Couloirman


Nov 15, 2009, 3:50 PM
Post #64 of 181 (6390 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2008
Posts: 109

Re: [qwert] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
Backt to topic:

I actually dont have something least favorite, as in "i really hate that crap", but i would say the camp bolo nuts rank rather high in that regard.
[image]http://www.bergfreunde.de/out/oxbaseshop/html/0/dyn_images/1/sol_325-0005_img1.jpg[/image]
Long ago i thought that would be a good idea, for those sport routes where you probably need a nut or two, so you dont have to buy/ carry a whole set.
Turns out if you need two nuts, the second one you need is always the most important one, and the one thats hanging on the first nut.
also a pain to rack, and you always need the nut on the other side of the side you grabbed it first.

I think if i ever need some more nuts, i simply cut away one nut, to have a normal one.

qwert


Wow, thats the worst idea/concept that Ive ever seen. How the hell did that get past the drawing board?


tomtom


Nov 15, 2009, 4:14 PM
Post #65 of 181 (6382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2004
Posts: 366

Re: [epoch] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
tomtom wrote:
But if you've ever had to put on your harness with your crampons or skis on or add rain pants while tied in, you'll discover the 'issue' with autolocking harnesses.

I actually enjoy the autolocking harness simply because it is easier to disassemble/reassemble when you need to put it on over bulky gear or if you need to put pants on while wearing it.

Aack! You're right! I learned something new.


(This post was edited by tomtom on Nov 16, 2009, 8:55 PM)


tradmanclimbs


Nov 15, 2009, 4:58 PM
Post #66 of 181 (6363 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: [tomtom] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Going to have to 2nd Dovals and tricamsCool


petsfed


Nov 15, 2009, 5:14 PM
Post #67 of 181 (6353 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599

Re: [tradmanclimbs] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've never found symmetry to be as important when setting up a carabiner brake, so the utility crabs I use, namely the Trango Classic Wire Gates, work just fine.

I also strongly dislike ovals and light Ds, carrying 2 of the former (good for racking nuts, although i wish I had oval wires so they were lighter) and none of the latter.

Boreal Diablos were pretty bad too. Only shoe I've ever seen that hurt but was waaay too big.


Lazlo


Nov 15, 2009, 6:30 PM
Post #68 of 181 (6322 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079

Re: [qwert] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
Backt to topic:

I actually dont have something least favorite, as in "i really hate that crap", but i would say the camp bolo nuts rank rather high in that regard.

Long ago i thought that would be a good idea, for those sport routes where you probably need a nut or two, so you dont have to buy/ carry a whole set.
Turns out if you need two nuts, the second one you need is always the most important one, and the one thats hanging on the first nut.
also a pain to rack, and you always need the nut on the other side of the side you grabbed it first.

I think if i ever need some more nuts, i simply cut away one nut, to have a normal one.

qwert

Seems like a good idea. Doesn't seem like Camp makes them anymore though. Interesting.


altelis


Nov 15, 2009, 7:05 PM
Post #69 of 181 (6306 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [petsfed] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

petsfed wrote:
...

Boreal Diablos were pretty bad too. Only shoe I've ever seen that hurt but was waaay too big.

Tell me about it! I got a pair a little big to wear with light socks on cooler long trad climbs.

I was about CRYING at the end of the day they were so painful. WTF?


Rudmin


Nov 16, 2009, 2:37 AM
Post #70 of 181 (6219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 606

Re: [altelis] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Metolius PAS. It's not terrible or anything, but every time I look at it I remember how much I paid for something that I could easily replace with knotted webbing or a piece of cord.


knieveltech


Nov 16, 2009, 3:03 AM
Post #71 of 181 (6198 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [petsfed] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dovals, the buckles on my n00btech harness and tricams bigger than pink.


dugl33


Nov 16, 2009, 5:15 AM
Post #72 of 181 (6137 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 6, 2009
Posts: 740

Re: [petsfed] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post



I won't let anyone near one of my ropes with one of these, even though this is what I started with BITD.

(oh, and someone gave me some OP lockers, free. free was way too expensive.)


ryanb


Nov 16, 2009, 6:35 AM
Post #73 of 181 (6108 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2004
Posts: 832

Re: [sungam] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
ryanb wrote:
sungam wrote:
ryanb wrote:
Link cams. Some people love these things but they have always seemed sketchy to me.
Just curious, have you used them more then twice?

Absolutely not. I don't use gear that won't hold a fall.

I would sooner climb on new aliens then new link cams.
LaughLaughLaugh I'm surprised by the sheer ridiculousness of that post.
So let's look at the situation. How many link cams have failed? 1. It was in a shitty pod and it blew from the torque. Okay, so they have to load in the direction of pull, just like most cams. So it was used in a situation the manufacturer tells you not to.
Now the aliens failed due to production failure. They broke below their rated strength on numerous occasions while being used exactly how the manufacturer said they should.
So we have one case of failure in a flared pod or numerous failures in perfect placements. Then let's look at how the companies handled it when there were defects. Yellow link has defects it's all over the net, all in the shops etc. and they replaced them for free. Aliens break and CCH ignored it and claimed they were tensile tested.

So basically I'm going gunna go ahead and assume there's something I missed (fully possible) or that you haven't been paying attention.


You did miss something. There have been two Link Cam failures, I'm assuming you know about the one at Jtree (Left Ski Track), there was also one at Smith. Both total link coupling failure due to placements in constrained pods as you mention. OP's handling of both events was ok (I think the cams should be recalled) but they now advise that links not be used in situations where their rotation is constrained.

The thing is, the majority of falls I have taken on cams have been on placements in some kind of pod, pin scar or constraining slot. This kind of placement is quite common on thin routes on granite. I can think of lots of spots at my local crags where the only piece of gear protecting a mandatory runout is a link sized cam you wiggle into a placement ... other cams are beyond bomber in this situation (a .75 camalot in pod feels like a bolt to me), links break.

I think the only reason more links haven't broken and people haven't died is that most people leading 5.11 are too smart to trust their lives to such a piece of junk. I actually can't think of anyone who leads 5.11 regularly and has them on their rack.

Aliens on the other hand still get used, they crop up in BD adds and I've met climbers sponsored by other companies that keep a few hidden away. There is no denying that CCH has the worst quality control in the history of climbing gear but their design is brilliant, the OP design is flawed.

I'm not actually buying any new aliens but if you offered me a rack of free ones I'd test the hell out of em and climb on ones whose heads were still on.


sungam


Nov 16, 2009, 9:53 AM
Post #74 of 181 (6069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [ryanb] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ryanb wrote:
sungam wrote:
ryanb wrote:
sungam wrote:
ryanb wrote:
Link cams. Some people love these things but they have always seemed sketchy to me.
Just curious, have you used them more then twice?

Absolutely not. I don't use gear that won't hold a fall.

I would sooner climb on new aliens then new link cams.
LaughLaughLaugh I'm surprised by the sheer ridiculousness of that post.
So let's look at the situation. How many link cams have failed? 1. It was in a shitty pod and it blew from the torque. Okay, so they have to load in the direction of pull, just like most cams. So it was used in a situation the manufacturer tells you not to.
Now the aliens failed due to production failure. They broke below their rated strength on numerous occasions while being used exactly how the manufacturer said they should.
So we have one case of failure in a flared pod or numerous failures in perfect placements. Then let's look at how the companies handled it when there were defects. Yellow link has defects it's all over the net, all in the shops etc. and they replaced them for free. Aliens break and CCH ignored it and claimed they were tensile tested.

So basically I'm going gunna go ahead and assume there's something I missed (fully possible) or that you haven't been paying attention.


You did miss something. There have been two Link Cam failures, I'm assuming you know about the one at Jtree (Left Ski Track), there was also one at Smith. Both total link coupling failure due to placements in constrained pods as you mention. OP's handling of both events was ok (I think the cams should be recalled) but they now advise that links not be used in situations where their rotation is constrained.

The thing is, the majority of falls I have taken on cams have been on placements in some kind of pod, pin scar or constraining slot. This kind of placement is quite common on thin routes on granite. I can think of lots of spots at my local crags where the only piece of gear protecting a mandatory runout is a link sized cam you wiggle into a placement ... other cams are beyond bomber in this situation (a .75 camalot in pod feels like a bolt to me), links break.

I think the only reason more links haven't broken and people haven't died is that most people leading 5.11 are too smart to trust their lives to such a piece of junk. I actually can't think of anyone who leads 5.11 regularly and has them on their rack.

Aliens on the other hand still get used, they crop up in BD adds and I've met climbers sponsored by other companies that keep a few hidden away. There is no denying that CCH has the worst quality control in the history of climbing gear but their design is brilliant, the OP design is flawed.

I'm not actually buying any new aliens but if you offered me a rack of free ones I'd test the hell out of em and climb on ones whose heads were still on.
To each their own, I guess. I know their limitations and use them in the way they were designed. Just like a beaner loaded over and edge, a link cam loaded with torque.
Aliens have one of the best designs, yes.
I have both Aliens and Links on my rack, but only one link. I like it because despite it's limitations in placements it's still has one of the highest versatility to weight ratios on my rack.


healyje


Nov 16, 2009, 10:24 AM
Post #75 of 181 (6066 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [ryanb] Your least favorite gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ryanb wrote:
The 12 mm mammut supersafe sold as a 10.2...I got suckered into getting one of these thinking it was the safe thing to do... what a beast to climb on.

Ha! On my fourth or fifth one - they're the only rope I'll do anything really hairball on. Hell, on a few occasions I've even used them a half ropes.

EDIT: Possibly these which, in a moment of stupidity, I owned for about 30 minutes.




(This post was edited by healyje on Nov 16, 2009, 10:32 AM)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook