Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Pulled off belay stance
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All


ClimbClimb


Jun 12, 2010, 4:27 AM
Post #26 of 190 (3870 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 5, 2009
Posts: 389

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
2]an anchor far back from the edge has similar difficulties whether you belay from anchor or from harness with redirect. I think its usually a bad idea to belay straight from harness with no redirect.
Why?

clc wrote:
I use the reverso in autoblock and like the freedom to eat , drink, sort gear, take pics.........Generally I can be organizing myself for the next pitch while waiting for the 2nd.

Not this again.


jt512


Jun 12, 2010, 4:32 AM
Post #27 of 190 (3869 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [ClimbClimb] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ClimbClimb wrote:
clc wrote:

I use the reverso in autoblock and like the freedom to eat , drink, sort gear, take pics.........Generally I can be organizing myself for the next pitch while waiting for the 2nd.

Not this again.

Nice catch.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Jun 12, 2010, 4:36 AM)


zeke_sf


Jun 12, 2010, 8:51 AM
Post #28 of 190 (3844 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
ClimbClimb wrote:
clc wrote:

I use the reverso in autoblock and like the freedom to eat , drink, sort gear, take pics.........Generally I can be organizing myself for the next pitch while waiting for the 2nd.

Not this again.

Nice catch.

Jay

Oh, jeebus, and what are they "organizing" themselves for on the next pitch? Lead belaying?


socalclimber


Jun 12, 2010, 12:13 PM
Post #29 of 190 (3827 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2437

Re: [zeke_sf] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
jt512 wrote:
ClimbClimb wrote:
clc wrote:

I use the reverso in autoblock and like the freedom to eat , drink, sort gear, take pics.........Generally I can be organizing myself for the next pitch while waiting for the 2nd.

Not this again.

Nice catch.

Jay

Oh, jeebus, and what are they "organizing" themselves for on the next pitch? Lead belaying?

A few months ago someone was using their reverso in autoblock mode and forgot a crucial step and dropped his partner.

I'll be his partner sure enjoyed the "freedom" of falling through the air and hitting the ground...


(This post was edited by socalclimber on Jun 12, 2010, 12:20 PM)


jt512


Jun 12, 2010, 2:08 PM
Post #30 of 190 (3808 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [socalclimber] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

socalclimber wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
jt512 wrote:
ClimbClimb wrote:
clc wrote:

I use the reverso in autoblock and like the freedom to eat , drink, sort gear, take pics.........Generally I can be organizing myself for the next pitch while waiting for the 2nd.

Not this again.

Nice catch.

Jay

Oh, jeebus, and what are they "organizing" themselves for on the next pitch? Lead belaying?

A few months ago someone was using their reverso in autoblock mode and forgot a crucial step and dropped his partner.

Hopefully, he at least got some good pics.

Jay


Partner rgold


Jun 12, 2010, 9:33 PM
Post #31 of 190 (3767 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

The term, "belaying off the anchor," usually involves two concepts that really deserve separate consideration:

1. The seconds weight is taken directly by the anchor in case of a fall.

2. An autolocking device is used (Reverso 3, ATC Guide, Gi-Gi plate, for example).

I don't think there is anything the matter with Item 1 except perhaps in a genuinely marginal and hopefully very rare situation.

There are quite a few problems with Item 2.

(a) The second gets an inferior belay because of the difficulty of paying slack back out through the autoblocking device. In some cases, when the rope runs diagonally or horizontally, such belays go from inferior to potentially dangerous.

(b) Once the second is hanging on the belay, lowering can be difficult or impossible. I know of experienced climbers who have had to go through a complete belay escape in order to lower a hanging climber.

(c) Belayers are encouraged to ignore conventional belay duties and trust the technology to work perfectly.

(d) The belayer intent on constructing an anchor to hold the device may opt for placements that are not the best available (I see quite a lot of this actually).

(e) In real trad situations as opposed to climbs with bolted belay anchors, there are plenty of anchors whose positioning is all wrong for placing the device on the anchor. In addition to the anchor being too low, an anchor that is too high encourages the belayer to use it anyway. In this case, if the anchor ends up being weighted by the second, it cannot even be reached in order to be released.

(f) Effort in pulling rope through the device is the dirty little secret of autoblockers. You really have to use smallish single and smallish half ropes to avoid getting pumped at the belay, and if your pitch has rope drag you are in for some major exercise.

(g) Added in edit: Many people like autoblockers for belaying two seconds in alpine contexts. But it is also harder to keep up with climbers moving quickly with these devices, which increases the possibility of a second taking a "leader fall" on the anchor, which is often not as bombproof on an alpine route.

My personal solution is to embrace Item 1 and eschew Item 2. I belay from my harness...off the anchor. To do this, I use clovehitchology to easily set up a taut anchor line for whatever belay position I've chosen, and then clip my belay device to the tie-in knot loop, not the harness belay loop. Belaying motions are those of the harness belay, but any load goes immediately to the anchor via the anchor rope, which supplies a significantly better shock-absorbing connection than you get by clipping a device directly to some cordelette made of low-stretch materials. (I don't change things around when belaying the leader; I think this is the best set-up for holding a factor-2 fall as well.)

This method is not always as comfortable and casual as standing next to an autolocker eating a sandwich while ostensibly belaying, but I think on balance it is far superior.

Redirecting through the anchor makes the least sense in my opinion, and the OP's experience is one of a number of examples.


(This post was edited by rgold on Jun 13, 2010, 5:36 PM)


patto


Jun 12, 2010, 10:34 PM
Post #32 of 190 (3751 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [rgold] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rgold wrote:
The term, "belaying off the anchor," usually involves two concepts that really deserve separate consideration:

1. The seconds weight is taken directly by the anchor in case of a fall.

2. An autolocking device is used (Reverso 3, ATC Guide, Gi-Gi plate, for example).

.....
.....

My personal solution is to embrace Item 1 and eschew Item 2. I belay from my harness...off the anchor. To do this, I use clovehitchology to easily set up a taut anchor line for whatever belay position I've chosen, and then clip my belay device to the tie-in knot loop, not the harness belay loop. Belaying motions are those of the harness belay, but any load goes immediately to the anchor via the anchor rope, which supplies a significantly better shock-absorbing connection than you get by clipping a device directly to some cordelette made of low-stretch materials. (I don't change things around when belaying the leader; I think this is the best set-up for holding a factor-2 fall as well.)

Redirecting through the anchor makes the least sense in my opinion, and the OP's experience is one of a number of examples.

As much as I'd love to argue your dismissive attitude to autoblocking plate devices I don't think is the thread for it. Besides we've had that argument. Wink

I agree with you about belaying from your harness off the anchor. Though personally don't use my tie in as the attachment point, though I do use the rope as my anchor.

It seems to me that many people redirect simply because they haven't practiced any other method.


clc


Jun 12, 2010, 10:40 PM
Post #33 of 190 (3745 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [rgold] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Reverso's and similar devices in autoblock don't work well with single ropes. Maybe super thin 9.5mm or less which I don't have. Just use a Gri-gri for a single rope. I only use double 8mm with the reveraso autoblock. This is very easy to pull the rope.


(This post was edited by clc on Jun 12, 2010, 10:41 PM)


patto


Jun 12, 2010, 11:21 PM
Post #34 of 190 (3732 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
Reverso's and similar devices in autoblock don't work well with single ropes. Maybe super thin 9.5mm or less which I don't have. Just use a Gri-gri for a single rope. I only use double 8mm with the reveraso autoblock. This is very easy to pull the rope.

Plain untrue. Try using a large radius carabiner and you'll see. I don't own a Gri-gri and see no need for one.


billcoe_


Jun 13, 2010, 3:41 PM
Post #35 of 190 (3678 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [rgold] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Although I feel Rgold (and JT512 as well) is one of the most knowledgeable and accurate posters on this site, I have a different take on this one. I'm sort of with Rgold 89% of the time and belay off of the harness, except I use the belay loop. Mfg's have tested the crap out of it, it works great, and that's why the loop is there. I feel that the benefit is minimal compared to the gain of using the tie in point instead of the belay loop.

I also feel that there are many situations where a redirect or an autoblock in turn makes a lot of sense, and refuse to approach it with a dogmatic attitude and to not consider utilizing those tools.

Concerning Autoblocking (this is perhaps what I use 1% - 2% of the time), certainly in many long alpine routes with 2 but especially 3 climbers, or a long friction route with 3 like some of the grade 3s on Glacier Point Apron would be best done with twin skinny 7.8's and and autoblocking for the 2 followers. Leader using both strands and followers on individual strands. Consider as well using it on an overhanging pitch where you don't have enough rope for your follower to be lowered to the ground or a stance. Of course, if you have the ability and rope available to be able to lower to the ground or a stance, using an autoblock would be crazy.

It's totally situational which we choose and preconceived notions and old stuck in a rut habits can hinder making the best choice. That just happened to me yesterday. I was belaying a new knob climb with an ATC, and realized that my location under the small overhang was not as safe as I thought, and I swapped out the atc for a gri gri when the climber was above me 40' still on lead. I belay lead climbs with a gri gri perhaps only 1% of the time (I rarely "sport climb" JT512 so no argument here) , and should have been reflecting on what would happen if I got popped hard with a rock whistling down form 50 meters even before the leader had left the ground. However, I'm relatively dogmatically opposed to belaying lead climbs with a gri gri (see comment above JT), and I had let my dogma and routine influence my original (bad) choice. I feel that these kinds of issues and choices are better if we are more flexible.

I'm probably 89% off the harness/anchor as described, 9% redirect, 1% autoblock, 1% undecided.... which might translate as a hip belay.Laugh

Hey JT, you counted each of those 318 words up there? Wow!


billcoe_


Jun 13, 2010, 3:53 PM
Post #36 of 190 (3671 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [patto] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
I am still puzzled why people redirect rather than belay off the anchor. Personally I either belay off my harness with no redirect or belay off the anchor.
Lets imagine you climb a bolted route that ends at a 2 bolt, 3/8" bolted anchor200' off the deck. Just 3 feet above you, at the start of the 2nd pitch, is a phat 1/2" bolt/empty hanger. You are saying that you would not clip that bolt to belay your 2nd up?

patto wrote:
Most of the people I climb with don't redirect. One time I was climbing with someone who did and I finished the pitch to find him perch on a ledge 3m horizontal to the redirect! Shocked He was not tied in to anything. Mad

So if I had fallen he would have been violently dragged off his perch with only the belay device keeping him from falling. I made sure I let him know that I didn't care if he felt safe, I wanted him tied in if he was belaying me.

IMO< this is not someone to ever climb with again, and it is not a "redirect" as he had never set up a belay to "redirect" the belay from originally.


patto


Jun 13, 2010, 4:52 PM
Post #37 of 190 (3665 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [billcoe_] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
patto wrote:
I am still puzzled why people redirect rather than belay off the anchor. Personally I either belay off my harness with no redirect or belay off the anchor.
Lets imagine you climb a bolted route that ends at a 2 bolt, 3/8" bolted anchor200' off the deck. Just 3 feet above you, at the start of the 2nd pitch, is a phat 1/2" bolt/empty hanger. You are saying that you would not clip that bolt to belay your 2nd up?

No. I have a perfectly good anchor where I am. Why would I redirect? Especially because it almost doubles the load and is non redundant. (Not that I would be worried about failure, but I fail to see the benefit of the redirect.)


clc


Jun 13, 2010, 5:19 PM
Post #38 of 190 (3662 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [patto] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
Lets imagine you climb a bolted route that ends at a 2 bolt, 3/8" bolted anchor200' off the deck. Just 3 feet above you, at the start of the 2nd pitch, is a phat 1/2" bolt/empty hanger. You are saying that you would not clip that bolt to belay your 2nd up?

No. I have a perfectly good anchor where I am. Why would I redirect? Especially because it almost doubles the load and is non redundant. (Not that I would be worried about failure, but I fail to see the benefit of the redirect.)

I agree. I can't see any good reason to redirect in this case. especially if its 2 nice bolts. I would "equalize" with a cordellete or long sling and use a gri-gri for a single rope or reverso for doubles.
I mostly use doubles on alpine rock or ice and climb with two 2nds following so I use the reverso in autoblock.


jt512


Jun 13, 2010, 11:50 PM
Post #39 of 190 (3635 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [billcoe_] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
Hey JT, you counted each of those 318 words up there? Wow!

Not by hand. I copy-and-pasted your post into a terminal and ran the Linux utility "wc" on it.

Jay


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 12:10 AM
Post #40 of 190 (3623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
patto wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
Lets imagine you climb a bolted route that ends at a 2 bolt, 3/8" bolted anchor200' off the deck. Just 3 feet above you, at the start of the 2nd pitch, is a phat 1/2" bolt/empty hanger. You are saying that you would not clip that bolt to belay your 2nd up?

No. I have a perfectly good anchor where I am. Why would I redirect? Especially because it almost doubles the load and is non redundant. (Not that I would be worried about failure, but I fail to see the benefit of the redirect.)

I agree. I can't see any good reason to redirect in this case. especially if its 2 nice bolts. I would "equalize" with a cordellete or long sling and use a gri-gri for a single rope or reverso for doubles.
I mostly use doubles on alpine rock or ice and climb with two 2nds following so I use the reverso in autoblock.

And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?

Jay


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 12:15 AM
Post #41 of 190 (3616 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I think you guys who belay your seconds directly off your harness have either never had to hold a hanging second, or you are total masochists.

Jay


clc


Jun 14, 2010, 12:15 AM
Post #42 of 190 (3613 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri. maybe a miss understanding. never direct from my harness.
only if she's nice, though I'm not sure what kind of fucking your talking about. It sounds bad. top roping is practice


(This post was edited by clc on Jun 14, 2010, 12:19 AM)


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 12:22 AM
Post #43 of 190 (3602 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri. maybe a miss understanding.

As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.

Jay


ADT


Jun 14, 2010, 12:31 AM
Post #44 of 190 (3594 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2010
Posts: 6

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am a little surprised by all the people on here suggesting that a redirect through an anchor is a good thing.

When you redirect through an anchor and them belay off your harness you are creating a 2-1 pully and therefore doubling your load on the anchor in the event of a fall. You are much better in almost all situations to belay from the anchor directly.

The anchor is exactly where you want the weight of a fall to end up. There are some cases where you might want to use your stance to lower the load on the anchor(belaying off harness), but if you are doing this on a regular basis then your luck is going to run out eventually.


clc


Jun 14, 2010, 1:06 AM
Post #45 of 190 (3575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.
Jay

definitely giving slack is tricky with the device in "guide mode" especially if the weight is on the rope. But I've been climbing for more than a few years and only had to give out slack a few times while belaying from the top using a reverso in autoblock mode.
the gri-gri hanging from 2 equalized bolts is nice.


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 1:09 AM
Post #46 of 190 (3572 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
jt512 wrote:
As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.
Jay

definitely giving slack is tricky with the device in "guide mode" especially if the weight is on the rope. But I've been climbing for more than a few years and only had to give out slack a few times while belaying from the top using a reverso in autoblock mode.

That's weird, because I'd say that the majority of the time I have to give my second slack at some point on the ascent.

Jay


mheyman


Jun 14, 2010, 1:48 AM
Post #47 of 190 (3562 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 607

Re: [billcoe_] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
Lets imagine you climb a bolted route that ends at a 2 bolt, 3/8" bolted anchor200' off the deck. Just 3 feet above you, at the start of the 2nd pitch, is a phat 1/2" bolt/empty hanger. You are saying that you would not clip that bolt to belay your 2nd up?

3 feet, no one else using it, third piece? Its part of my anchor - but no I probably would not redirect from one piece when I have a three bolt anchor.

I like to belay from my harness, similar to RG IE the anchor is set to handle the load.


whipper


Jun 14, 2010, 2:00 AM
Post #48 of 190 (3556 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2002
Posts: 241

Re: [ADT] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

ADT wrote:
I am a little surprised by all the people on here suggesting that a redirect through an anchor is a good thing.

When you redirect through an anchor and them belay off your harness you are creating a 2-1 pully and therefore doubling your load on the anchor in the event of a fall. You are much better in almost all situations to belay from the anchor directly.

The anchor is exactly where you want the weight of a fall to end up. There are some cases where you might want to use your stance to lower the load on the anchor(belaying off harness), but if you are doing this on a regular basis then your luck is going to run out eventually.
what a mis informed dumbass statement....do you understand mechanical advantage (pulley) systems at all... it is a redirect, there is NO multiplication of forces. on a redirect, if you pull in one foot of rope, the rope on the other side moves one foot, in a 2 to 1 mech advantage, if you pull in one foot of rope, the other side moves 6 inches, do some home work, dumbass


ADT


Jun 14, 2010, 2:04 AM
Post #49 of 190 (3552 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2010
Posts: 6

Re: [whipper] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

You might want to do your homework before you start calling people dumbasses.


whipper


Jun 14, 2010, 2:09 AM
Post #50 of 190 (3544 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2002
Posts: 241

Re: [ADT] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

nope, it is NOT a 2 to 1.....it is a redirect

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook