Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Pulled off belay stance
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All


blueeyedclimber


Jun 14, 2010, 2:09 AM
Post #51 of 190 (2441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [robdotcalm] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robdotcalm wrote:
(and remarkably nobody said I was a noob or a gumby),

Climbing noob? No. Rc.com noob? Maybe, for not realizing this would turn into a pissing match of "My way to belay is better than your way to belay." BORING!!!!CoolTongue


clc


Jun 14, 2010, 2:13 AM
Post #52 of 190 (2432 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
That's weird, because I'd say that the majority of the time I have to give my second slack at some point on the ascent.

Jay
I use the reverso autoblock when climbing alpine rock or ice and often belaying 2 climbers {1 per thin 8mm half rope} on easy terrain {up to low 5.10}.
The rope stretches a lot so they could just hang on the rope a bit if they need slack. And maybe I don't belay really tight.

on smaller more difficult cragging routes I use the Gri-gri with a single rope and I have to give slack out sometimes.


ADT


Jun 14, 2010, 2:27 AM
Post #53 of 190 (2423 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2010
Posts: 6

Re: [whipper] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

whipper wrote:
nope, it is NOT a 2 to 1.....it is a redirect

Here you go numbnuts. Scroll down a bit and it will explain to you in simple terms how a redirect effectivly doubles the force on an anchor minus friction of course.

http://climbinglife.com/tech-tips/whats-the-force-on-your-anchor.html


reno


Jun 14, 2010, 2:29 AM
Post #54 of 190 (2420 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 2:30 AM
Post #55 of 190 (2417 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
jt512 wrote:
That's weird, because I'd say that the majority of the time I have to give my second slack at some point on the ascent.

Jay

The rope stretches a lot so they could just hang on the rope a bit if they need slack.

Thank you for confirming my hunch.

Jay


blueeyedclimber


Jun 14, 2010, 2:54 AM
Post #56 of 190 (2408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [reno] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

Gotta ask the question:

Why do you have a reverso, if not for the autolock function?


whipper


Jun 14, 2010, 2:55 AM
Post #57 of 190 (2404 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2002
Posts: 241

Re: [ADT] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

ADT wrote:
whipper wrote:
nope, it is NOT a 2 to 1.....it is a redirect

Here you go numbnuts. Scroll down a bit and it will explain to you in simple terms how a redirect effectivly doubles the force on an anchor minus friction of course.

http://climbinglife.com/tech-tips/whats-the-force-on-your-anchor.html

here you go, just because some one wrote an article on the inter web, does NOT make it a 2 to 1 pulley system....
http://www.howstuffworks.com/pulley.htm
http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~williar4/html/HapEd/NASA/SimpMach/Pulley.htm
http://www.explainthatstuff.com/pulleys.html

I could go on all day proving my point, could you


(This post was edited by whipper on Jun 14, 2010, 2:57 AM)


ADT


Jun 14, 2010, 2:58 AM
Post #58 of 190 (2402 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2010
Posts: 6

Re: [whipper] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

The point is that a redirect effectively doubles the load on the anchor. THAT is FACT. I dont really care to argue with you. You can believe what you want.


whipper


Jun 14, 2010, 3:04 AM
Post #59 of 190 (2398 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2002
Posts: 241

Re: [ADT] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

ADT wrote:

When you redirect through an anchor and them belay off your harness you are creating a 2-1 pully and therefore doubling your load on the anchor in the event of a fall.
.......but if you are doing this on a regular basis then your luck is going to run out eventually.

hmm, not what you said here is it, and no this is not just semantics, it is a gross misunderstanding on your part.
I really love the last line, I just cant believe the rash of anchors blowing apart lately from all the luck running out....
tell me ADT, how is a top rope redirect with you standing close to the anchor, any different from a slingshot belay


moose_droppings


Jun 14, 2010, 4:47 AM
Post #60 of 190 (2370 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [reno] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 5:01 AM
Post #61 of 190 (2363 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [moose_droppings] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.

Well, you sound like an accident waiting to happen.

Jay


clc


Jun 14, 2010, 5:27 AM
Post #62 of 190 (2358 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 495

Re: [whipper] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

whipper wrote:
ADT wrote:

When you redirect through an anchor and them belay off your harness you are creating a 2-1 pully and therefore doubling your load on the anchor in the event of a fall.
.......but if you are doing this on a regular basis then your luck is going to run out eventually.

hmm, not what you said here is it, and no this is not just semantics, it is a gross misunderstanding on your part.
I really love the last line, I just cant believe the rash of anchors blowing apart lately from all the luck running out....
tell me ADT, how is a top rope redirect with you standing close to the anchor, any different from a slingshot belay

Both of you guys have points. The redirect does effectively double the force on the "top anchor" that the rope runs through but so does lead climbing. But we take lead falls all the time {atleast I do} and the cam or bolt doesn't pull. So the forces on the anchor will be quite low with a guy following up 2nd compared to taking a fall from above onto the gear.
really if your concerned about the forces on a redirect anchor, you better stop lead climbing.


banjolele


Jun 14, 2010, 5:55 AM
Post #63 of 190 (2353 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 10, 2010
Posts: 44

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm still a new climber, but I'm not new to basic physics. Redirecting a force off a set piece does create a pulley effect when one object tries to lift another object.

Now, if the object being pulled (the belayer in this case) is already being held up by the object (such as a hanging belay) the pulley effect is pretty much negated.


patto


Jun 14, 2010, 7:46 AM
Post #64 of 190 (2342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453

Re: [banjolele] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

banjolele wrote:
I'm still a new climber, but I'm not new to basic physics. Redirecting a force off a set piece does create a pulley effect when one object tries to lift another object.

Now, if the object being pulled (the belayer in this case) is already being held up by the object (such as a hanging belay) the pulley effect is pretty much negated.

Check your physics again. HINT look at the tension in the rope. (A 2x multiplication is assuming no friction at pully. Tests have shown that it is closer to 1.6x with carabiner friction.)


sungam


Jun 14, 2010, 12:22 PM
Post #65 of 190 (2315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [clc] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clc wrote:
really if your concerned about the forces on a redirect anchor, you better stop lead climbing.
Well, maybe I have just had the misfortune of "lead" climbing in some unfortunate locations, but there have definitely been one of two occasions of "ah shit, don't fall off..." where I belayed straight off my harness in an attempt to keep any kind of force as far from the anchor as possible. I mean I was leafing my rope over a sling that was clipped from me to the anchor - if the anchor blew, the rope would have gotten all tangled and shit.


moose_droppings


Jun 14, 2010, 3:31 PM
Post #66 of 190 (2290 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.

Well, you sound like an accident waiting to happen.

Jay

Enlighten me Jay. Why am I and Reno accidents waiting to happen?


jt512


Jun 14, 2010, 4:08 PM
Post #67 of 190 (2282 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [moose_droppings] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.

Well, you sound like an accident waiting to happen.

Jay

Enlighten me Jay. Why am I and Reno accidents waiting to happen?

Because, since the braking direction would be up, you would need to be above the anchor to brake effectively, which would put you in a position in which you could take a factor-2 fall onto your own anchor. I don't see how this could be safe, except on flat ground.

Jay


hafilax


Jun 14, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #68 of 190 (2264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri. maybe a miss understanding.

As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.

Jay
It's not hard to give slack through an autoblock if it's asked for before weighting the rope. You just pull on the rope biner while yarding out the rope much in the same way you would hold the cam open on a GriGri.


banjolele


Jun 14, 2010, 4:38 PM
Post #69 of 190 (2259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 10, 2010
Posts: 44

Re: [patto] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

patto wrote:
banjolele wrote:
I'm still a new climber, but I'm not new to basic physics. Redirecting a force off a set piece does create a pulley effect when one object tries to lift another object.

Now, if the object being pulled (the belayer in this case) is already being held up by the object (such as a hanging belay) the pulley effect is pretty much negated.

Check your physics again. HINT look at the tension in the rope. (A 2x multiplication is assuming no friction at pully. Tests have shown that it is closer to 1.6x with carabiner friction.)

I wasn't pretending to actually do the math on the exact forces involved, nor cite unnamed tests. I was just pointing out there is a multiplication of forces on the anchor, be it 2 or 1.6.


moose_droppings


Jun 14, 2010, 4:43 PM
Post #70 of 190 (2255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [jt512] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.

Well, you sound like an accident waiting to happen.

Jay

Enlighten me Jay. Why am I and Reno accidents waiting to happen?

Because, since the braking direction would be up, you would need to be above the anchor to brake effectively, which would put you in a position in which you could take a factor-2 fall onto your own anchor. I don't see how this could be safe, except on flat ground.

Jay

If my tie in point were above the anchor, placing myself in a position for a FF2, it would be almost impossible for me to reach down and take in slack. So that situation hasn't come into play yet.

Only my brake hand needs to be above the PP when braking. With the PP above my tie in point, this isn't hard to do. Though it is situational, I'll belay a second up this way frequently.

While I see your concern, I try to never put myself in a position that would cause a FF2 on to the anchor.


csproul


Jun 14, 2010, 5:08 PM
Post #71 of 190 (2238 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [moose_droppings] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
jt512 wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
reno wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri.

Gotta ask the question:

Am I the only guy who belays seconds direct from the anchor using a Reverso, but NOT in autoblock mode?

You might be. I use an ATC Guide off the anchor most of the time and not in autoblock mode for bringing up a single second.

Well, you sound like an accident waiting to happen.

Jay

Enlighten me Jay. Why am I and Reno accidents waiting to happen?

Because, since the braking direction would be up, you would need to be above the anchor to brake effectively, which would put you in a position in which you could take a factor-2 fall onto your own anchor. I don't see how this could be safe, except on flat ground.

Jay

If my tie in point were above the anchor, placing myself in a position for a FF2, it would be almost impossible for me to reach down and take in slack. So that situation hasn't come into play yet.

Only my brake hand needs to be above the PP when braking. With the PP above my tie in point, this isn't hard to do. Though it is situational, I'll belay a second up this way frequently.

While I see your concern, I try to never put myself in a position that would cause a FF2 on to the anchor.
You, of course, can belay however you like, but I would not find this acceptable. Many years ago I took a AMGA self rescue class. In this class, we went over the process of lowering someone straight from the anchor with an ATC type device clipped straight to anchor. We were taught to take the bake strand and clip it to a point higher than the PP, thus redirecting the brake strand to brake back down towards the belayer (picture rope coming up, through the device, brake strand exiting and up to a redirect carabiner and back down to the belayer). I wondered at the time why the redirect was necessary. It wasn't hard to demonstrate that it was difficult to control a hanging weight (much less a fall) while having to brake with your arm above the PP/device. So I agree with Jay, that to effectively brake, you would need to be above the PP/device. And as you have pointed out, if you were it'd be difficult to reach down and take in or give out slack. This probably won't convince you of anything, nor will you likely convince me of the opposite, so it's all probably moot anyway.


redlude97


Jun 14, 2010, 5:12 PM
Post #72 of 190 (2233 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990

Re: [ADT] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ADT wrote:
The point is that a redirect effectively doubles the load on the anchor. THAT is FACT. I dont really care to argue with you. You can believe what you want.
This is true, but it still doesn't make it a 2 to 1 pulley system. It is still just a redirect. The force the belayer must hold is equal to the force generated by the falling climber(minus friction).


moose_droppings


Jun 14, 2010, 5:34 PM
Post #73 of 190 (2223 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [csproul] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Good luck taking in slack when redirecting the brake strand.

I don't find it hard at all to lock off in high friction mode at all. Though I've yet to lower dead weight into space the way you've suggested, I can see the advantages for the redirect then. It would be simple enough after locking off to just clip the strand to a piece of the anchor and lower.


Partner robdotcalm


Jun 14, 2010, 5:40 PM
Post #74 of 190 (2219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027

Re: [hafilax] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri. maybe a miss understanding.

As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.

Jay
It's not hard to give slack through an autoblock if it's asked for before weighting the rope. You just pull on the rope biner while yarding out the rope much in the same way you would hold the cam open on a GriGri.

Which means that if the 2nd falls and needs slack he's not going to get it. .

r.c


hafilax


Jun 14, 2010, 5:48 PM
Post #75 of 190 (2206 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [robdotcalm] Pulled off belay stance [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robdotcalm wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
clc wrote:
"""And fuck the second. Afterall, toproping isn't "real" climbing, is it?"
Jay ""

I always belay 2nds from the anchor usually with reverso autoblock or gri-gri. maybe a miss understanding.

As has been discussed in other threads, you can't provide your second a decent belay with any of these silly "Guide Mode" type devices, due to the difficulty of giving them slack quickly. Shouldn't be much of an issue with a grigri, though.

Jay
It's not hard to give slack through an autoblock if it's asked for before weighting the rope. You just pull on the rope biner while yarding out the rope much in the same way you would hold the cam open on a GriGri.

Which means that if the 2nd falls and needs slack he's not going to get it. .

r.c
That's not slack, it's lowering. Depending on the anchor it's not that difficult to lower someone. It can be as easy as putting a biner in the release hole (R^3 or atc-guide) and pulling up while controlling the rope with the other hand. It can be as difficult as having to setup a redirect system that pulls up on it.


First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook