|
moeman
Dec 15, 2005, 9:49 PM
Post #27 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2002
Posts: 1417
|
In reply to: I haven't done it in 20 years, but Pleasant Overhangs is also a great climb. Back in the day, (before sticky rubber and tiny cams) Triple S was a manly route (5.8 my arse) with a couple of dubious placements at the crux. I remember a 40 footer on that one once...classic.
What tiny cams? That crack eats nuts and hexes. Though sticky rubber certainly is a bonus...
(And it still is 5.6) :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
fishbelly
Dec 15, 2005, 10:03 PM
Post #28 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2004
Posts: 273
|
Ye Gods an little fishes
Alcoa
Kosher critter.
I am glad I did most the 5.9s before they were upgraded to 10s
They were hard then. Dont think I could handle tham at 5.10
|
|
|
|
|
overzealous
Dec 15, 2005, 10:59 PM
Post #29 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 257
|
In reply to: In reply to: No, it is the way it is supposed to be. It is in line with yosemite and therefore is correct. fully agree!
Having climbed at Seneca a good bit, and at Yosemite once, I still find the Seneca grades to be a good bit harder, at least in the 5.7-5.9 range.
They may be just as technically demanding at the valley, but I found these climbs to be much less physically demanding.
I expected the opposite, since I'm much more accustomed to the style of climbing at Seneca.
|
|
|
|
|
climboard
Dec 16, 2005, 3:00 PM
Post #30 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503
|
In reply to: Having climbed at Seneca a good bit, and at Yosemite once, I still find the Seneca grades to be a good bit harder, at least in the 5.7-5.9 range. They may be just as technically demanding at the valley, but I found these climbs to be much less physically demanding. I expected the opposite, since I'm much more accustomed to the style of climbing at Seneca.
That's been my experience- the grades at Seneca tend to be stouter than Yosemite unless you are talking about offwidths.
|
|
|
|
|
azrockclimber
Dec 16, 2005, 3:32 PM
Post #31 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 666
|
can you climb in seneca during the winter months?
|
|
|
|
|
fishbelly
Dec 16, 2005, 4:29 PM
Post #32 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2004
Posts: 273
|
Pick your days and climb in the sun.
|
|
|
|
|
nowinowski
Dec 16, 2005, 4:35 PM
Post #33 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2003
Posts: 134
|
How about best 10's and 11's ? Lets hear it
Pyschokiller
Nip and Tuck
Orangeaid
Terra Firma
|
|
|
|
|
climboard
Dec 16, 2005, 5:01 PM
Post #34 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503
|
In reply to: How about best 10's and 11's ? Lets hear it Pyschokiller Nip and Tuck Orangeaid Terra Firma
Sunshine
Castor
Pollux
Cottonmouth
Broken Neck
Agony
Changeling
Autumn Fire
Ambush
Nip and Tuck is one of my favorites at any grade, anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
forkliftdaddy
Dec 16, 2005, 5:08 PM
Post #35 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2003
Posts: 408
|
This might be a good place to mention that the hook placement on Negative Feedback has been compromised/is greatly degraded. A guy fell on it and broke the rock. The hook held, and maybe it would again, maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
cragmasterp
Dec 16, 2005, 5:49 PM
Post #36 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2003
Posts: 278
|
I've gotta put in some props for Lichen or Leave It, great one pitch classic.
Triple S for sure,
Alcoa Presents is super special because of its positioning.
Dufty's pop off (5.7 R) should be on any ones list that can lead 5.8 solid at Seneca. Crux is well protected and fun (roof) and the runout to the belay can be fairly well protected with modern gear.
|
|
|
|
|
nowinowski
Dec 16, 2005, 8:09 PM
Post #37 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2003
Posts: 134
|
the hook placement on Negative Feedback is a Gimmick sp?. Way cool route with or without it.
|
|
|
|
|
microbarn
Dec 16, 2005, 8:25 PM
Post #38 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 12, 2004
Posts: 5920
|
In reply to: In reply to: How about best 10's and 11's ? Lets hear it Pyschokiller Nip and Tuck Orangeaid Terra Firma Sunshine Castor Pollux Cottonmouth Broken Neck Agony Changeling Autumn Fire Ambush Nip and Tuck is one of my favorites at any grade, anywhere.
Are you just trying to name all of them??? :)
|
|
|
|
|
nowinowski
Dec 16, 2005, 8:29 PM
Post #39 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2003
Posts: 134
|
they are hidden al over I actually think there are more good hard climbs at seneca than easy ones cause they tend to be the cleaner ones. Anyone done the Sorceror?
|
|
|
|
|
climboard
Dec 16, 2005, 9:43 PM
Post #40 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: How about best 10's and 11's ? Lets hear it Pyschokiller Nip and Tuck Orangeaid Terra Firma Sunshine Castor Pollux Cottonmouth Broken Neck Agony Changeling Autumn Fire Ambush Nip and Tuck is one of my favorites at any grade, anywhere. Are you just trying to name all of them??? :)
LOL- no, but to be honest I don't think I've been on anything 5.9+ and above at Seneca that hasn't been enjoyable. Like Nowinowski said, they tend to be really clean lines.
I haven't been on the Sorceror but it is on my to-do list, it's been highly recommended by a few people I know along with Psycho Killer and Sidewinder.
|
|
|
|
|
cclarke
Jan 26, 2006, 8:12 PM
Post #41 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160
|
nowinowski wrote: Anyone done the Sorceror?
I've done it a few times. It's thin by the lower bolts and easier higher up. I recall the gear as good between the bolts and the climbing not so hard there.
|
|
|
|
|
virginia_alpinist
Jan 26, 2006, 8:35 PM
Post #42 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 79
|
most definately SSS!!! a solid 5.9+ anywhere else...
|
|
|
|
|
emilb
Jan 26, 2006, 8:49 PM
Post #43 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 40
|
I didn't think TripleS was all that hard for 5.8. Not a gimme but nowhere near as hard as Air Show at Moore's Wall or Paradise Alley at Shortoff. Of course I like stemming.
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 26, 2006, 8:55 PM
Post #44 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
I agree. I just think it's a 100' pitch of good sustained climbing. I'm not a 5.10 climber (nor a Seneca 5.9 climber, but I was able to do that one just fine. Maybe I just had the technique down.
|
|
|
|
|
virginia_alpinist
Jan 26, 2006, 9:01 PM
Post #45 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 79
|
Opinions will always vary..... mine well it's probably because I moved out to CO last July and the .9's here are more like Seneca .7's... I have climbed at Seneca most of my life and am proud to say it's the stiffest anywhere! I learned to lead their in the '70s..
I am leading .10c here pretty much onsite and following .11b... doubt I would ever get to this level @ Seneca...
|
|
|
|
|
up_for_a_good_time
Jan 26, 2006, 9:06 PM
Post #46 of 46
(5229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 111
|
Soler (5.7), as I've experienced, can turn into a pretty wicked 5.10+ route if you don't read the guidebook correctly and stray from the intended line. Pulling a small roof and pretty stupid runouts made for a "dude, if your mom knew you just did that..." kind of day. Good times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
