Forums: Climbing Information: Injury Treatment and Prevention:
Souders Crack 11d groundfall
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Injury Treatment and Prevention

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 Next page Last page  View All


kane_schutzman


May 5, 2007, 3:19 AM
Post #26 of 354 (22840 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2005
Posts: 896

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That looks like an obvious brase failier.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 3:43 AM
Post #27 of 354 (22820 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [kane_schutzman] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Argh! Crazy myspace is blocked at my work, so those hyperlinked pics aren't showing up for me.


caughtinside


May 5, 2007, 3:48 AM
Post #28 of 354 (22816 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [bobruef] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobruef wrote:
Argh! Crazy myspace is blocked at my work, so those hyperlinked pics aren't showing up for me.

they aren't pretty. the unit is basically brand new, stamped '307.' there is next to no deformation on the lobes, which I suspect means that the cam failed at a ridiculously low load. I"m not sure if you could have even aided on that rig.

It isn't apparent whether it was stamped 'tensile tested' or not. I will speculate and say it wasn't, otherwise we would have seen a photo...?


medicus


May 5, 2007, 3:52 AM
Post #29 of 354 (22807 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [kane_schutzman] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kane_schutzman wrote:
That looks like an obvious brase failier.

I obviously know that the bottom part of this photo is from that failure, but what about the circled area on the this? (By bottom part, I mean the bottom of the unit where the braze occurs...the part I have circled is just above that area)



(This post was edited by medicus on May 5, 2007, 5:43 PM)


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 3:59 AM
Post #30 of 354 (22790 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [caughtinside] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
bobruef wrote:
Argh! Crazy myspace is blocked at my work, so those hyperlinked pics aren't showing up for me.

they aren't pretty. the unit is basically brand new, stamped '307.' there is next to no deformation on the lobes, which I suspect means that the cam failed at a ridiculously low load. I"m not sure if you could have even aided on that rig.

It isn't apparent whether it was stamped 'tensile tested' or not. I will speculate and say it wasn't, otherwise we would have seen a photo...?

Yowza! Unsure Thanks for the update.
In reply to:


wings


May 5, 2007, 4:00 AM
Post #31 of 354 (22786 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 2, 2004
Posts: 283

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The cable goes through the rope sheath and connects to the head assembly where you've placed the blue circle.

What is the discolouration? Perhaps extra braze material. I can't say for certain from the photos.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 4:03 AM
Post #32 of 354 (22780 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [wings] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It was that discolored location I was concerned about. Thanks... I am just curious if that is merely extra material or what. I know none of my aliens have had similar discolorations, but that doesn't mean a flipping thing since the QC of the actual cams ability seems to be very unstable... I doubt that there is more QC over the aesthetics of the cams, so if it is just extra material, that is totally feasible in my opinion.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 4:07 AM
Post #33 of 354 (22777 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks for posting up a non-myspace picture!

I'm not sure what you're asking, but It looks like the cable broke, not the brazing (from this view). Then it must have pulled through the sheath (sorry if I'm stating the obvious). Sheath is held on by trigger wires. That circled are looks like an intact brazing.

It's hard to imagine what would cause a cable like that to fail? From this view (again, sorry, I can't see the other pictures), it looks like a relatively clean break. Hard to imagine what could cause a break like that? Overheating of that section of cable durring brazing maybe? Perhaps someone more knowledgable could suggest what would cause a failure like that?

Wierd.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 4:08 AM
Post #34 of 354 (22776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [bobruef] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobruef wrote:
Thanks for posting up a non-myspace picture!

Links to pictures...
http://i21.photobucket.com/...dbd84ec5b9a6e74a.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/...8b7c55f00c56be62.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/...68f2b9e21dd5ecb7.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/...6ed602d2fa02e6d2.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/...f710e324891a90c6.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/...1afd80a6e7e007fe.jpg

Sorry to those that this seems pointless... just getting it to where bobruef can see them.


(This post was edited by medicus on May 5, 2007, 4:14 AM)


rightarmbad


May 5, 2007, 4:43 AM
Post #35 of 354 (22740 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 218

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Looks to me like the cable was not fully inserted into the head before it was brazed, or maybe pulled out a little before cooling. Hard to tell from pictures though. More, better pictures would be nice if possible.
I like my old aliens.
Couldn't give me a new one at the moment.
In reply to:
Except for use as a keyring.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 4:47 AM
Post #36 of 354 (22735 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks! I really appreciate it.

Here's a picture of the Orange Alien from Indian Creek (the one that started the dimple recall) for comparison:


Being able to see all the pictures now (thanks again, medicus), it looks like a similar, albeit slightly different failure. With the Orange, it looks like the brazing connection wasn't sufficient and/or was brittle from the cooling process that allegedly caused the dimpled cam failures. Again, I know little to nothing about brazing, but maybe the failure would be similar to a arc-weld that penetrates too deep into the metal?

That's scary stuff. If this cam is supposedly tensile tested (and it should be since its from March of 07), how can anyone trust that CCH has tensile tested cams they send in?

Caughtinside makes an excellent point about the lobes not being deformed. Alien lobes are soft (another redeeming feature of their design). I've put bigger divots in mine w/ bodyweight.

What really makes my stomach turn is that his placement looks textbook, and the cam looks so new.

So CCH is saying that the failure had to be due to the cam being impropperly loaded over an edge and/or being kinked repeatedly over that point? First off, I have a hard time imagining Alien stems being affected appreciably by that kind of loading. Second, If that cam saw, or had seen loading over any kind of ledge, you'd see some kinks in the trigger wires too.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 5:01 AM
Post #37 of 354 (22720 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [bobruef] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Not a problem, glad you could offer more insight into the situation. I think it's all ridiculously scary now. Thanks for the comparison picture too, I have only seen one other picture of one the the recall failures. If this one was in fact tensile tested, something else had to happen such as abuse to the cam. I agree with you bobruef... the wire looks to clean for anything like that. I highly doubt that this cam was tensile tested, otherwise I don't see how it could have passed.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 5:13 AM
Post #38 of 354 (22704 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

medicus wrote:
Not a problem, glad you could offer more insight into the situation. I think it's all ridiculously scary now. Thanks for the comparison picture too, I have only seen one other picture of one the the recall failures. If this one was in fact tensile tested, something else had to happen such as abuse to the cam. I agree with you bobruef... the wire looks to clean for anything like that. I highly doubt that this cam was tensile tested, otherwise I don't see how it could have passed.

I swear i was reading in one of these threads about somebody sending in a bunch of aliens, and having them come back w/ some of them stamped "tensile tested" and some not stamped. You really can't win here. If it was stamped, this would seem to render their new "stamp of approval" worthless, as it appears the cam wan't tested. If it wasn't stamped, that would mean they shipped it out w/out testing. If the latter is the case, then cams w/ "tensile tested" may still be trustworthy. Either way, this looks like a serious oversight on their part.

I've always heard that the safest airline to fly on is the one that had the most recent accident, as they'll be at a heightened sense of awareness in matters pertaining to safety and security. It seems not to be the case here.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 5:20 AM
Post #39 of 354 (22696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [bobruef] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, you did read that somewhere. I don't remember where it was either, but I have read that post also. The issue I see with this, is even if the cam wasn't stamped, and the ones that are stamped may still be trustworthy... the key word there is may. If I take a fall, this $54 piece of gear may do what it is supposed to do. It may hold me in the event of a fall. The last thing I want to have to seriously worry about is if the gear I placed in a perfect placement will hold or not due to manufacture defects.


healyje


May 5, 2007, 6:44 AM
Post #40 of 354 (22658 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The cam stem did not "break over an edge" and this is not an example of the previous "brazing failure" which was the subject of the recall. This is a new failure modality likely resulting from failing to check to see if the stem was still really seated down in the shaft before brazing. It was clearly only inserted a a couple of millimeters at the time of the brazing at best.

And that isn't the bad news. To be honest, manufacturing errors happen, what is sad in this case is that it is fairly indicative that all new cams are not being pull/tensile tested before shipping. I find it incredibly hard to belive this cam would ever have passed any such a test.

Mistakes, even recalls happen, but for a cam stamped '307' to fail after the miscues of the past two years, well - there really is nothing whatsoever left to say - the defective cams speak for themselves. It is clear at this point that self-help is not the answer to the woes besetting CCH. If you're going to use Aliens then the responsibility has now officially passed on to you. And if I was you (and I am for these purposes) I'd do just what Maldaly said he was going to do - get a hammer and funkness and do your own damn testing. Get on'em or get down.


fear


May 5, 2007, 7:00 AM
Post #41 of 354 (22649 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 475

Re: [healyje] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It seems pretty clear that the cable did NOT break.... It wasn't seated into the stem and just the end was barely brazed to it...

Could we get an extreme close-up shot of the end of the cable where it pulled out? If the cable broke, you would see lots of stretched/deformed cable strands poking out...

Damn man.... I wish I liked the C-3's.... Guess I'm going to have to learn to...

PLEASE someone at Black Diamond buy out these idiots at CCH!

-Fear


Power_Tie


May 5, 2007, 7:03 AM
Post #42 of 354 (22644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2007
Posts: 30

Re: [fear] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

When I was looking to purchase cams, I discounted these CCH Aliens right away. They look like they were made in some drunk's garage! I am much happier with the products made by Black Diamond Equipment.


pjdf


May 5, 2007, 1:49 PM
Post #43 of 354 (22595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 23, 2006
Posts: 307

Re: [healyje] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I remember previous discussion by Russ Walling about possibly selling an "Alien tester." Anyone know if anything came of that? If so, I'd definitely be up for buying stuff to test a few Aliens.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 2:09 PM
Post #44 of 354 (22580 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [healyje] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey healyje,

If the failure mode is as you indicated, what's with the smooth end of the cable seen in the Orange Alien photo? Is this just the end of the cable that's been melted down? Or are there some sort of connectors or end pieces to these cables? If this one wasn't inserted completely and just pulled out, wouldn't we see the same smooth end to the cable, and wouldn't we see a hole in the head where it was supposed to have been inserted?

I'll defer to you opinion on this, as you've had the most direct experience with the company. I'm a little curious though.


soillclimber


May 5, 2007, 4:48 PM
Post #45 of 354 (22442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 21, 2005
Posts: 31

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

medicus, the stamp (from what I am told) is the month and year, as I stated in my post. 3/07. Not sure what damage to the stem you are seeing. In the placement pic, you can see that the cam is in the direction of pull and there is nothing for it to go over. Maybe you are looking at the black sheath that was around the stem? that is soft and the stem went all the way through it before it failed. hope that helps. Going climbin, see ya tomorrow.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 5:08 PM
Post #46 of 354 (22410 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [soillclimber] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm sorry... I'm probably going to sound somewhat rude here, but I have this exact model of alien (I was under the impression it was an older model when I got it). I know there is a stamp of the date... that isn't what I was inquiring about. I tried to upload a picture with a blue circle around the part I was talking about. It is just above the area where the brazing occurs. It is on the outside metal part, and someone on here mentioned the thought that it might be extra braze stuff or whatever. The area I am talking about in no way would have been affected by the current fall we're discussing; it just looked like there may have been the possibility of some sort of damage prior to this placement.


soillclimber


May 5, 2007, 5:47 PM
Post #47 of 354 (22369 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 21, 2005
Posts: 31

Re: [medicus] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Medicus, Yep, I saw the pic that you uploaded. Not too sure what that is. It doesn't appear in the other photos. When I posted I had not read the whole second page of responses, my bad. Alright, really going this time. I see how people get sucked into the forum world. This is why you all never see me. It is real nice to see everyone concerned about this and each other. Take care all, I going to go whip on some bolts.


medicus


May 5, 2007, 6:14 PM
Post #48 of 354 (22341 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 727

Re: [soillclimber] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah it does appear in the other photo where this specific side of the cam can be seen. Check the other placement pic that was included... it harder to see, but it definitely is still there. The other pics do not show this side of the unit, therefore it couldn't be seen.


healyje


May 5, 2007, 7:57 PM
Post #49 of 354 (22258 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [bobruef] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobruef wrote:
Hey healyje,

If the failure mode is as you indicated, what's with the smooth end of the cable seen in the Orange Alien photo? Is this just the end of the cable that's been melted down? Or are there some sort of connectors or end pieces to these cables? If this one wasn't inserted completely and just pulled out, wouldn't we see the same smooth end to the cable, and wouldn't we see a hole in the head where it was supposed to have been inserted?

I'll defer to you opinion on this, as you've had the most direct experience with the company. I'm a little curious though.

Bob, the orange alien photo shows the intact, brazed stem perfectly seperated from the head leaving all the brazing material on the stem almost as if it had been cast. That gives it the appearance of being a seperate piece, but it really is just the brazing material formed around the cable by the head cavity it was supposed to have adhered to.

In this other one you can see about the normal amount of brazing material that flows down/up the stem from the braze, which is the best clue the stem cable wasn't inserted into the head more than just a bit at the time of the brazing. If you could get the slug of brazing material out of the head intact it would look like the cable end in the orange alien picture.


bobruef


May 5, 2007, 8:21 PM
Post #50 of 354 (22229 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [healyje] Souders Crack 11d groundfall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ok, that makes sense.

Thanks

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Injury Treatment and Prevention

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook