Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
cam less rack
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


Partner rrrADAM


Jul 7, 2003, 5:36 PM
Post #51 of 55 (4736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: cam less rack [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I disagree with "the leader must not fall" mentality unless it is X-Rated, as you will not push yourself. It should be instinct to push away from the rock when falling, if not, you are not falling safely.


X-Rated=Leader must not fall, or they will die.
R-Rated=Leader must not fall, or they will be seriously injured.
PG-Rated=Leader should not fall, as there is a potential for injury.
G-Rated=Fall if properly protected. (This includes landings like ledges and/or protusions.)


This however, is only my opinion.


brutusofwyde


Jul 8, 2003, 12:40 AM
Post #52 of 55 (4736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 3, 2002
Posts: 1473

Re: cam less rack [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Uh, Chuck Pratt did the 5.10d Twilight Zone before they even had tube chocks, let alone cams. He flashed the crux basically free solo because he didn't have big enough pitons.

Well, actually he hung out on jams while someone ran down to the car to get a pin big enough to fit the crack. But then again, the cars could park a lot closer to the cliff, so the story is not as impressive as at first glance. I mean, most of us would feel perfectly comfortable hanging out in the middle of a 5.10d offwidth crux while someone ran to the car to get a piece, eh? :wink:

Brutus


jon_dittman


Jul 10, 2003, 1:47 PM
Post #53 of 55 (4736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2003
Posts: 16

Re: cam less rack [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Back in the old days when I were a nipper, we didn't have friends or cams. We used wooden wedges and stones with slings around them in cracks, before someone came up with the idea of using drilled out machine nuts tied with pieces of chord.

Still managed to climb up to 5.10c and never did me any harm! :wink:


rhu


Jul 13, 2003, 10:47 PM
Post #54 of 55 (4736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 15, 2003
Posts: 242

Re: cam less rack [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would follow John Long's advice and learn how to place passive pro first and when you become solid doing that then you will understand how to place anything. It does not work the other way around. If someone as respected as he is says this is the case then I will accept it as truth.


tradmanclimbs


Jul 13, 2003, 11:04 PM
Post #55 of 55 (4736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: cam less rack [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It is totaly possible to climb a whole bunch of stuff without cams but it is definatly easier and in many cases safer to have the cams. If you do buy cams , buy good ones as they will last at least 10 years. It's worth the extra dough to get the best.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook