|
sid_rock
Nov 19, 2003, 10:55 PM
Post #1 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
I was taking about this with my girlfriend the other day, and I'm curious how you guys and gals feel about it.
How many partners would it take for you to consider a man or woman a ho? In order words, if you were going out with this girl (or guy), and you found out that she (or he) had X partners before you, what is the minimum value of X for which you would think, "Holy crap, what a ho!"
My contention?
For guys, more than 30 partners make you a ho.
For girls, more than 20 partners make you a ho.
Oh, let's also assume we're talking about people in the age bracket 25-30.
One final word. People, don't jump on the PC bandwagon and give me that crap about, "Her/his past shouldn't not matter," or, "Men should be held to the same ho-threshold as women."
|
|
|
|
|
tgreene
Nov 19, 2003, 10:59 PM
Post #2 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 22, 2003
Posts: 7267
|
Ummm, divide by 3! :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
rvega
Nov 19, 2003, 11:03 PM
Post #3 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 28, 2003
Posts: 421
|
If you can't count on your fingers and toes
You's a ho.
|
|
|
|
|
crap
Nov 19, 2003, 11:13 PM
Post #4 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 25, 2002
Posts: 491
|
If you have to ask, then I guess that makes you both a ho.
|
|
|
|
|
hangerlessbolt
Nov 19, 2003, 11:27 PM
Post #5 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2001
Posts: 7255
|
I was always told...any more than a handful and you're just being greedy
|
|
|
|
|
jabtocrag
Nov 19, 2003, 11:34 PM
Post #6 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2003
Posts: 476
|
More than me :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
wishiwaswest
Nov 20, 2003, 12:33 AM
Post #7 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 966
|
Two questions:
A) Why is the number lower for women - and don't give me me this "men shouldn't be held to the same threshold BS" or this arrogant Canadian/American prick/???? will come over there and smack you silly
b) Who got paid
|
|
|
|
|
sid_rock
Nov 20, 2003, 12:42 AM
Post #8 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
In reply to: Two questions: A) Why is the number lower for women - and don't give me me this "men shouldn't be held to the same threshold BS" or this arrogant Canadian/American prick/???? will come over there and smack you silly b) Who got paid
:lol: Don't hate da playa, hate da game, lady. I don't make the rules, I just live by them.
Of course, you could talk to an evolutionary biologist and (s)he would probably give you some pretty compelling reasons as to why men are not, and should not be, held to the same standards as women when it comes to sexual morality.
|
|
|
|
|
wishiwaswest
Nov 20, 2003, 1:01 AM
Post #9 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 966
|
In reply to: In reply to: Two questions: A) Why is the number lower for women - and don't give me me this "men shouldn't be held to the same threshold BS" or this arrogant Canadian/American prick/???? will come over there and smack you silly b) Who got paid :lol: Don't hate da playa, hate da game, lady. I don't make the rules, I just live by them. Of course, you could talk to an evolutionary biologist and (s)he would probably give you some pretty compelling reasons as to why men are not, and should not be, held to the same standards as women when it comes to sexual morality.
You're preaching to the wrong choir here. My educational background is Evolutionary Biology and Physical Anthropology - and I don't mean I took some courses in school, I have my Ph.D. I can give you some excellent arguments on both sides of the equation as to the BIOLOGICAL issues involved, however, this is a MORALITY issue in todays society, not a biological one - you seem to be confusing the two - OH! no you're not - In reply to: why men are not, and should not be, held to the same standards as women when it comes to sexual morality
So, not only can I disagree wid da playa - I can call da bluff on his game - and honey, since they are NOT da rules everyone lives by, ya don't gotta play by d'em.
|
|
|
|
|
sid_rock
Nov 20, 2003, 1:05 AM
Post #10 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
In reply to: ...My educational background is Evolutionary Biology and Physical Anthropology - and I don't mean I took some courses in school, I have my Ph.D...
D-OH!!!
Edit: Just wanted to add that much, if not all, morality is predicated by evolutionary biology, so it is acceptable for me to blur the line between biological issues and moral issues. For instance, it is morally wrong to procreate with your sibling because such a union will likely produce unhealthy offspring. It is morally wrong to kill because killing is, in general, bad for the species. I would continue with this but two things are keeping me from doing so: one, I will probably not win such an argument with someone who has a PhD on the subject; and two, I have to now go to the Y and swim a mile.
Now can we please get back on the subject?!?
|
|
|
|
|
eric
Nov 20, 2003, 2:01 AM
Post #11 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 1430
|
It's not the number that matters, it's how many you can remember.
|
|
|
|
|
calliope
Nov 20, 2003, 2:10 AM
Post #12 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2002
Posts: 1212
|
In reply to: It's not the number that matters, it's how many you can remember.
You only have to count it if you can actually remember their names. :wink:
Grow up. Who cares? I'd say it's individual. If they give you a number, and your jaw drops, and you start to feel a little inferior on the sowing of the oats scale, that's your problem, my friend. You asked.
Save the awkward questions for something important like..."Have you been tested?"
|
|
|
|
|
jaylaka
Nov 20, 2003, 2:13 AM
Post #13 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 382
|
In reply to: For guys, more than 30 partners make you a ho. For girls, more than 20 partners make you a ho.
nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers.
besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number?
jen
|
|
|
|
|
strongbad
Nov 20, 2003, 2:57 AM
Post #14 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2003
Posts: 802
|
Are we talking same day here?
|
|
|
|
|
sid_rock
Nov 20, 2003, 3:42 AM
Post #15 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
In reply to: nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers. besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number? jen
Edited because my supposedly funny comment was, in hindsight, disrespectful.
|
|
|
|
|
reddaisies
Nov 20, 2003, 4:01 AM
Post #16 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2003
Posts: 29
|
In reply to: In reply to: nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers. besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number? jen Ho alert.
hmmm.... not nice to call people names. makes me wonder what type of person you are.... so quick to judge without getting to know the person. not a good quality in a person.
the number should never matter.... it's whether the person mattered to you, and if not (at least not anymore), you should have learned something (esp. how to double your pleasure :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
moabbeth
Nov 20, 2003, 4:40 AM
Post #17 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 22, 2002
Posts: 1786
|
In reply to: nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers. besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number? jen
I agree. Hey, some people just like sex...nothing wrong with that :wink:. Doesn't make them a 'ho. As long as the sex is good and you're being safe with it, does it really matter how many partners the other person had?
|
|
|
|
|
eric
Nov 20, 2003, 4:54 AM
Post #18 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 1430
|
In reply to: the number should never matter.... it's whether the person mattered to you, and if not (at least not anymore), you should have learned something (esp. how to double your pleasure :lol:
Well said. What I meant by "remembering".
|
|
|
|
|
sid_rock
Nov 20, 2003, 4:55 AM
Post #19 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
In reply to: In reply to: nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers. besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number? jen I agree. Hey, some people just like sex...nothing wrong with that :wink:. Doesn't make them a 'ho. As long as the sex is good and you're being safe with it, does it really matter how many partners the other person had?
I'd like one, just one guy to step forward and agree with what Beth has said here, and say that he would not think his girlfriend was a ho if he found out that she had had, say, 80 partners.
|
|
|
|
|
deleted
Deleted
Nov 20, 2003, 5:14 AM
Post #20 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
[quote:24139908db="sid_rock"]I'd like one, [i:24139908db]just one[/i:24139908db] guy to step forward and agree with what Beth has said here, and say that he would not think his girlfriend was a ho if he found out that she had had, say, 80 partners.[/quote:24139908db]
yo, sid ... it's for you. madonna on line 3.
|
|
|
|
|
sid_rock
Nov 20, 2003, 5:18 AM
Post #21 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 516
|
In reply to: In reply to: I'd like one, just one guy to step forward and agree with what Beth has said here, and say that he would not think his girlfriend was a ho if he found out that she had had, say, 80 partners. yo, sid ... it's for you. madonna on line 3.
Good point. BTW, do you know what headline UK's The Sun carried for Madonna and Guy Ritchie's wedding? Guy Weds Whore.
Besides, I really doubt Madonna has humped 80 guys. Any woman sweet enough to write a children's book called "The English Garden" could never have done something like that, right?
|
|
|
|
|
thomasribiere
Nov 20, 2003, 12:08 PM
Post #22 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
|
what's a ho? :?:
|
|
|
|
|
jaylaka
Nov 20, 2003, 12:09 PM
Post #23 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 382
|
In reply to: In reply to: nah, being a ho is a state of mind that can't be defined by numbers. besides, when all's said and done, does it really matter how many people you've slept with? or do you really need to know your significant other's number? jen Edited because my supposedly funny comment was, in hindsight, disrespectful.
good call, sid. :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unabonger
Nov 20, 2003, 4:44 PM
Post #25 of 77
(1870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689
|
In reply to: I'd like one, just one guy to step forward and agree with what Beth has said here, and say that he would not think his girlfriend was a ho if he found out that she had had, say, 80 partners.
I agree! I agree!
My previous girlfriend banged the Cincinatti Bengals defensive squad on our second date just to test me. Then she made me sleep in the wet spot. You think I was threatened by that? Hmph.
The Secure UnaBonger
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
