|
sticky_fingers
Jan 23, 2004, 5:22 PM
Post #26 of 47
(2739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 17, 2003
Posts: 420
|
In reply to: In reply to: Ever heard of a typo asshole a typo is a typographical error; a slip of the finger ... hitting the wrong key, that sort of thing. unless you suffered a grand mal siezure during your original post, you, my friend, had no friggin' idea as to the spelling of derogatory. Mtngeo, thank you for spelling what he really meant because I was having a hell of time trying to figure out why this thread kept bumping...Deurogetory?? WTF? listen dynoclimber, you really need to spend more time on school. Is it boring because it's over your head? Dynoclimber, nobody wants to have a battle of wits with you.... CUZ YOU'RE FRIGGIN' UNARMED!!!
|
|
|
|
|
usmc_2tothetop
Jan 23, 2004, 5:23 PM
Post #27 of 47
(2739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2002
Posts: 661
|
??????????????????????????
|
|
|
|
|
usmc_2tothetop
Jan 23, 2004, 5:24 PM
Post #28 of 47
(2739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2002
Posts: 661
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL Tweek I hope your not serious.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Jan 23, 2004, 5:28 PM
Post #29 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: (6 on one hand, half dozen on the other?) Dude! You have six fingers on one hand and a HALF DOZEN on the other!!! How does that affect your climbing? weird thread to let your secret out though.... :lol: oi vey... (some people, you just kaint reach) DMT ah fugetaboutit! It's a MUTE point anyway. hehe DMT
|
|
|
|
|
climbersoze
Jan 23, 2004, 5:32 PM
Post #30 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 1142
|
In reply to: Dynoclimber, nobody wants to have a battle of wits with you.... CUZ YOU'RE FRIGGIN' UNARMED!!! Knowledge is power...... Damn! You are weak! (not you, sticky :D )
|
|
|
|
|
reno
Jan 23, 2004, 5:39 PM
Post #31 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283
|
In reply to: Knowledge is power... And power corrupts... So study hard and become corrupted, right?
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Jan 23, 2004, 5:40 PM
Post #32 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
You need to read the Forum descriptions... Moving this to guess where ??? Suggestions & Questions :roll:
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Jan 23, 2004, 5:41 PM
Post #33 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
rrrADAM moved this thread from General to Suggestions & Questions.
|
|
|
|
|
vertical_reality
Jan 23, 2004, 6:00 PM
Post #34 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 19, 2002
Posts: 2073
|
I guess he can't spell or read. Good thing he's putting the effort into school rather then wasting time in class posting on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
climbersoze
Jan 23, 2004, 6:02 PM
Post #35 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 1142
|
In reply to: In reply to: Knowledge is power... And power corrupts... So study hard and become corrupted, right? Ignorance corrupts. :P
|
|
|
|
|
thomasribiere
Jan 25, 2004, 7:47 AM
Post #36 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
|
mtngeo, that's a "typo"... :wink: there should be a "sit starter" or a "crashpad squatter" rank before the "boulderer" one, or maybe a "toproper" or a "pig" or just a "nOOb"!
|
|
|
|
|
andypro
Jan 25, 2004, 9:09 AM
Post #37 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1077
|
In reply to: there should be a "sit starter" or a "crashpad squatter" rank before the "boulderer" one, or maybe a "toproper" or a "pig" or just a "nOOb"! Where does l337 n00b fit in?
|
|
|
|
|
flamer
Jan 25, 2004, 2:43 PM
Post #38 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 22, 2002
Posts: 2955
|
In reply to: I am a boulderer and we are definitely better than certain climbers. In general we also care about keepin the rocks in good condition and not being stupid or doing stupid things. Did you really just say this? From my experience's, thus far, boulder's are the worst "land steward's" in the climbing community(The French being a close second). When's the last time you've ever heard of a Traditional climber talk about cutting down tree's that are in the way? I've seen boulder's do it on numerous occasion's! When's the last time a wall climber threw ton's of small rocks onto a major trail, because they were "in the way". I know a trail in the Flatirons that I can hardly run now because Boulder's didn't want their landings cluttered. I could go on but you get the point. Now I knolw it's like anything else, you'll always have some good and some bad...but if you're going to make generalization's, then you'd better get your facts straight. josh
|
|
|
|
|
boulder_monkey
Jan 27, 2004, 2:21 PM
Post #39 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 60
|
i love how as all of you are trying to insult him and talk sh!t about him, at the same time you're boosting his user rating like 1000 points by posting all the damn replies and viewing your replies to see if someone has replied to your replies. i'll almost guarantee you that he just stopped looking at this forum after his third post. the posts were just there to give you something to fight about and comment on. so excuse me if i'm mistaken, but in the process of trying to bring public view of him down, you all did just the opposite by boosting his user rating. :lol: :lol: good job everyone! ~pz all! rock on!
|
|
|
|
|
boulder_monkey
Jan 27, 2004, 2:24 PM
Post #40 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 60
|
oh and by the way, please psychoanalyze mine the same way!! i'm begging you! i don't really mind being b!tched at. provides quite a few giggles :lol: and hell, if it gets my rating up who gives a sh!t. :D ~pz all! rock on!
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Jan 27, 2004, 2:25 PM
Post #41 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
In reply to: so excuse me if i'm mistaken, but in the process of trying to bring public view of him down, you all did just the opposite by boosting his user rating. :lol: :lol: good job everyone! ~pz all! rock on! wtf is a user rating? DMT
|
|
|
|
|
josephine
Jan 27, 2004, 2:32 PM
Post #42 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2002
Posts: 5794
|
In reply to: In reply to: so excuse me if i'm mistaken, but in the process of trying to bring public view of him down, you all did just the opposite by boosting his user rating. :lol: :lol: good job everyone! ~pz all! rock on! wtf is a user rating? DMT ah yeah i was wondering the same thing :?
|
|
|
|
|
dc
Jan 27, 2004, 2:43 PM
Post #43 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 355
|
In reply to: there should be a "sit starter" or a "crashpad squatter" rank before the "boulderer" one, or maybe a "toproper" or a "pig" or just a "nOOb"! i agree with "toproper".. that should be below boulderer.. not above.. then again.. it does require a harness.. a rope.. a carabiner or two.. a belay device.. sling to set-up the anchor.. etc.. so maybe the rankings are all based on financial status? but in that case, boulderers should still be above top-ropers, cos weed isnt cheap these days!! (my source of comedic inspiration comes from The Great Dingus)
|
|
|
|
|
boulder_monkey
Jan 27, 2004, 3:14 PM
Post #44 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 60
|
user rating....wow....people please....theres one in everyones profile! its basically how much you contribute to the site. http://www.rockclimbing.com/site/websitehelp.php#9 that should answer your questions....some of them anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
mrme
Jan 27, 2004, 3:26 PM
Post #45 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2003
Posts: 449
|
i think it is on the low end of the scale because it requirs the least amount of start up money, not beacuse one form of climbing is better than another.
|
|
|
|
|
climbsomething
Jan 27, 2004, 3:59 PM
Post #46 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588
|
wah. They're supposed to be for fun, nothing more. No need to read into anything. If you want titles to reflect reality though, how about "whining chuffer?" Would that be better?
|
|
|
|
|
josephine
Jan 27, 2004, 4:02 PM
Post #47 of 47
(2743 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 8, 2002
Posts: 5794
|
In reply to: wah. They're supposed to be for fun, nothing more. No need to read into anything. If you want titles to reflect reality though, how about "whining chuffer?" Would that be better? roflmao ^5 Hil :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
|