|
pedro_sandchez
Feb 23, 2009, 12:43 AM
Post #1 of 66
(6253 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 31
|
So this weekend I dropped my petzl reverso and attache about 60ish feet. Not sure how it happened, I'm guessing part of my shirt got caught in the gate when I clipped it to my harness because when I reached up to unlock a different biner, i heard it unclip and fall. Bassically, it slid down a slabby face and then dropped off the vertical face. My partner down below saw it happen and tried to catch it. It bounced off of his palm and landed in the dirt at his feet. It didn't land directly on rock or anything just in the dirt. I am convinced it is totally safe in that it didn't impact any rock at the base of the climb. My partner on the other hand is skeptical. I just wanted to get some other opinions. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Feb 23, 2009, 12:46 AM
Post #2 of 66
(6248 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
pedro_sandchez wrote: So this weekend I dropped my petzl reverso and attache about 60ish feet. Not sure how it happened, I'm guessing part of my shirt got caught in the gate when I clipped it to my harness because when I reached up to unlock a different biner, i heard it unclip and fall. Bassically, it slid down a slabby face and then dropped off the vertical face. My partner down below saw it happen and tried to catch it. It bounced off of his palm and landed in the dirt at his feet. It didn't land directly on rock or anything just in the dirt. I am convinced it is totally safe in that it didn't impact any rock at the base of the climb. My partner on the other hand is skeptical. I just wanted to get some other opinions. Thanks hmmmm. yawn. its safe. move on. or maybe the right response is beware of microfractures, send it to me for proper disposal. or maybe its STFU n00b or maybe its do a search!!!! i dunno. i'm bored of this game.
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Feb 23, 2009, 12:54 AM
Post #3 of 66
(6238 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
It is probably safe from a metallurgical standpoint. Or is it? If you have to ask here, or your partner is at all worried, then you need to get a new device. Think how bad you would feel if something happened because you wanted to save a few bucks. none of you will climb at 100% wondering about this. Dial in your systems so nothing like this happens to your new belay device.
(This post was edited by edge on Feb 23, 2009, 1:00 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
bandycoot
Feb 23, 2009, 2:20 AM
Post #4 of 66
(6179 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028
|
Inspect: if fine, then use.
(This post was edited by bandycoot on Feb 23, 2009, 2:20 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Feb 23, 2009, 3:07 AM
Post #5 of 66
(6156 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
It bounced off his palm and landed in dirt? You're retarded if you go buy another device because you think that one is dangerous. That's no worse than tossing it to your partner and him not catching it... Jesus. I swear to god you're all way too fucking paranoid. I'm a safe person, but you have to draw the line somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
d0nk3yk0n9
Feb 23, 2009, 3:17 AM
Post #6 of 66
(6148 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2009
Posts: 182
|
Inspect it carefully. If you see anything at all that makes you (or your partner) worry, then retire it and get a new one. If you don't, then don't worry about it. However, if your partner is really worried about it, I'd get a new one (or have him chip in to get a new one) so that he's not focusing on that instead of on climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
coastal_climber
Feb 23, 2009, 3:30 AM
Post #7 of 66
(6132 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542
|
Have a look at the gate, does it close properly? Yes? Good to go.
|
|
|
|
|
pedro_sandchez
Feb 23, 2009, 3:38 AM
Post #8 of 66
(6124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 31
|
Thanks for the input guys. It seems like the consensus is that it is okay. I apologize for the noobish question. I did some searches and there was nothing that really reflected a drop which I felt was similar to my scenario thus the reason for the perhaps redundant post. Of course for the rest of the day I belayed my partner on my backup belay device which I carry in the pack for exactly this type of scenario. I am convinced that the device is safe and I will continue to use it at least for myself. If he still isn't convinced and is insecure with it, then I can always use my backup belay for belaying him.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Feb 23, 2009, 3:39 AM
Post #9 of 66
(6124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
coastal_climber wrote: Have a look at the gate, does it close properly? Yes? Good to go. The OP is asking about the belay device, not the biner, as evidenced by the subject of: "Dropped belay device still safe?" Do you even bother to read before you post a reply?
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Feb 23, 2009, 3:46 AM
Post #10 of 66
(6120 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
marc801 wrote: coastal_climber wrote: Have a look at the gate, does it close properly? Yes? Good to go. The OP is asking about the belay device, not the biner, as evidenced by the subject of: "Dropped belay device still safe?" Do you even bother to read before you post a reply? The less you know about the thread, the easier it is to post whore.
|
|
|
|
|
coastal_climber
Feb 23, 2009, 6:22 AM
Post #11 of 66
(6073 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542
|
marc801 wrote: coastal_climber wrote: Have a look at the gate, does it close properly? Yes? Good to go. The OP is asking about the belay device, not the biner, as evidenced by the subject of: "Dropped belay device still safe?" Do you even bother to read before you post a reply? Hard day at the office?
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Feb 23, 2009, 6:35 AM
Post #12 of 66
(6066 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth?
(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Feb 23, 2009, 6:35 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
suilenroc
Feb 23, 2009, 6:48 AM
Post #13 of 66
(6054 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 13, 2006
Posts: 581
|
majid_sabet wrote: ...so what is your life worth? yup.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Feb 23, 2009, 6:52 AM
Post #14 of 66
(6048 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? Really... Hmmm. See I too read the same article but the actual results was 100% of the devices were safe. And it was REI that did the test. And it was on carabiners. REI found that all of their carabiners they dropped failed above their rating.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Feb 23, 2009, 6:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Urban_Cowboy
Feb 23, 2009, 9:58 AM
Post #15 of 66
(6020 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 3, 2009
Posts: 219
|
majid_sabet wrote: so what is your partner's life worth? FIFY I don't use/trust "iffy" gear, not that I'm made of money, but really, what is a life worth, and how bad would you feel if something failed that you knew was questionable? Chances are that it's fine, but this sport is dangerous enough as it is; why add to that?
|
|
|
|
|
the_leech
Feb 23, 2009, 4:33 PM
Post #16 of 66
(5956 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392
|
majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? Yes, it's true. Major Sorbet has rediscovered MICROFRACTURES!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Feb 23, 2009, 4:44 PM
Post #17 of 66
(5947 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
USnavy wrote: Really... Hmmm. See I to read the same article but the actual results was 100% of the devices were safe. And it was REI that did the test. And it was on carabiners. REI found that all of their carabiners they dropped failed above their rating. This was in no way, shape, or form a definitive test. I am in the process of contacting the person originally in charge of this test to get more details. As far as I know, there hasn't been any definitive test proving or disproving the existence or effect of microfractures in dropped gear. Majid, would you care to link to that study you are citing?
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Feb 23, 2009, 4:52 PM
Post #18 of 66
(5938 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
marc801 wrote: coastal_climber wrote: Have a look at the gate, does it close properly? Yes? Good to go. The OP is asking about the belay device, not the biner, as evidenced by the subject of: "Dropped belay device still safe?" Do you even bother to read before you post a reply? Did you? IF you read the post, you'll notice he said reverso AND attache (which is a biner). Just sayin' Josh
|
|
|
|
|
jeepnphreak
Feb 23, 2009, 4:53 PM
Post #19 of 66
(5935 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259
|
majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? Ut ohh, we have stats with out citations... How about a like to this atricle. Back on to the question... I think that its safe, asumming that your partners hand really did contact teh R3 first before it hit the ground. BUT being a paranoied PITA I would also retire it and get a new one just in case. IMHO my partner nor I are going to die over a $30 piece of eqipment that may be in question
|
|
|
|
|
reg
Feb 23, 2009, 4:55 PM
Post #20 of 66
(5933 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560
|
i dropped my reverso - hit the talus from about 200' up. didn't even bother lookin for it. but that's me
|
|
|
|
|
trenchdigger
Feb 23, 2009, 4:55 PM
Post #21 of 66
(5933 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2003
Posts: 1447
|
majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please...
(This post was edited by trenchdigger on Feb 23, 2009, 4:57 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
marde
Feb 23, 2009, 5:03 PM
Post #23 of 66
(5914 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 169
|
trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... majid is absolutely right, you won't be able to see internal fractures in aluminum like in most other materials except glass.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Feb 23, 2009, 5:05 PM
Post #24 of 66
(5904 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something.
|
|
|
|
|
trenchdigger
Feb 23, 2009, 5:07 PM
Post #25 of 66
(5901 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2003
Posts: 1447
|
majid_sabet wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something. There's the majid I know...
|
|
|
|
|
trenchdigger
Feb 23, 2009, 5:13 PM
Post #26 of 66
(3537 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2003
Posts: 1447
|
marde wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... majid is absolutely right, you won't be able to see internal fractures in aluminum like in most other materials except glass. <sigh> here we go again... Any impact large enough to do "internal" damage to aluminum will also result in significant external damage. The only way to get dangerous "microfractures" is via fatigue. Climbing gear used as intended will never be subject to the type of loading that could produce or propagate "invisible" or "internal" fatigue cracks.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Feb 23, 2009, 5:15 PM
Post #27 of 66
(3537 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something. There's the majid I know... go search BD site
|
|
|
|
|
jdefazio
Feb 23, 2009, 5:24 PM
Post #28 of 66
(3532 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 228
|
pedro_sandchez wrote: So this weekend I dropped my petzl reverso and attache about 60ish feet. Not sure how it happened, I'm guessing part of my shirt got caught in the gate when I clipped it to my harness because when I reached up to unlock a different biner, i heard it unclip and fall. Apparently you weren't climbing hard enough, or the shirt would have been a non-issue.
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Feb 23, 2009, 5:26 PM
Post #29 of 66
(3531 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
jdefazio wrote: pedro_sandchez wrote: So this weekend I dropped my petzl reverso and attache about 60ish feet. Not sure how it happened, I'm guessing part of my shirt got caught in the gate when I clipped it to my harness because when I reached up to unlock a different biner, i heard it unclip and fall. Apparently you weren't climbing hard enough, or the shirt would have been a non-issue.
|
|
|
|
|
reg
Feb 23, 2009, 5:40 PM
Post #30 of 66
(3522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560
|
trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something. There's the majid I know... careful trenchdigger - the majid i know will make you his women
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Feb 23, 2009, 5:54 PM
Post #31 of 66
(3511 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
reg wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I'm calling BS as well. But what else is new? Reference please... You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something. There's the majid I know... careful trenchdigger - the majid i know will make you his women Sure sounds like you're speaking from personal experience....
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Feb 23, 2009, 6:05 PM
Post #32 of 66
(3504 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
pedro_sandchez wrote: My partner down below saw it happen and tried to catch it. It bounced off of his palm and landed in the dirt at his feet. He couldn't catch it? What a butter-fingers! Replace your partner!
(This post was edited by kachoong on Feb 23, 2009, 6:05 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Feb 23, 2009, 6:05 PM
Post #33 of 66
(3501 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
majid_sabet wrote: many years ago, one of the hardware mfgs dropped 100 hardware and did an extensive testing after each drop and discovered that almost 90+% of the dropped gear were fine but then you got the few which did not. Aluminum is not a metal that you can easily detect internal cracks or signs of stress by visual inspection. To be able to see stress factors, you must use an x-ray or do other test such as ultrasonic which YOU do not have at home so what is your life worth? I bought an MRI just for this purpose. In other news, I dropped my reverso once. It pinged off rocks on the way down and landed in the ferns. A few months later a guy I know came up to me at the gym and said that he found my device but didn't want to just leave it around since we'd be a while in descending. He was about to run out to his car to grab it when I told him to keep it. Good karma on his part (he deserved the reward), but I was also wary of its strength.
|
|
|
|
|
grover
Feb 23, 2009, 6:08 PM
Post #34 of 66
(3498 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: 569
|
Keep the device and replace your partner. His hand might have a micro-fracture. meh edited to add: bah... kachoong beat me to the punchline by 3 minutes!
(This post was edited by grover on Feb 23, 2009, 6:12 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Feb 23, 2009, 6:38 PM
Post #35 of 66
(3482 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
shoo wrote: USnavy wrote: Really... Hmmm. See I to read the same article but the actual results was 100% of the devices were safe. And it was REI that did the test. And it was on carabiners. REI found that all of their carabiners they dropped failed above their rating. This was in no way, shape, or form a definitive test. Maybe, maybe not. If I remember right they dropped 20 carabiners from a reasonable distance onto concrete and everyone failed above its rating. So if zero out of twenty are bad... well... it’s obvious what that hints... Consider this. Black Diamond themselves specifically state that dropped carabiners are likely safe to use if the gate action is good and there is no visible damage to the carabiner on their website. Another thing to think about. Have you ever in your life heard of a belay device (or any gear) failing specificaly because it was dropped? I have never heard of a belay device failing period let alone one failing from being dropped. I have tried to pull test a few of the belay devices on the market that were about ten years old and in all cases my static rope failed before the belay device. If the OP dropped the carabiner 60 feet and it hit his partner’s hand and landed in the dirt its ultra likely that its fine.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Feb 23, 2009, 6:50 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
reg
Feb 23, 2009, 6:51 PM
Post #36 of 66
(3468 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560
|
altelis wrote: reg wrote: trenchdigger wrote: majid_sabet wrote: You call it BS cause you are Pendejo and can tell the difference between sh*t and burrito . Here smoke this (+==) chingon and come back when you feel like you know something. There's the majid I know... careful trenchdigger - the majid i know will make you his women Sure sounds like you're speaking from personal experience.... damn it. should've added something like: "ask angry" -
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Feb 23, 2009, 6:56 PM
Post #37 of 66
(3459 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
How could a tube style belay device fail at all. I could see a reverso failing in the autoblock mode, but that seems like it would be unlikely to occur given the low forces generated by a top rope fall.
|
|
|
|
|
lostparrot
Feb 23, 2009, 11:07 PM
Post #38 of 66
(3423 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 28, 2007
Posts: 149
|
AL does NOT develop microfractures. If it is damaged on the inside, it WILL be visible on the outside(may take close, careful examination to see, but will be visible). This whole thing about micrfractures is a joke. AL does not crack like that unless it is heat treated. AL is a soft metal. As long as the gate action is okay, and the openings on the belay device are okay, they are fine.
|
|
|
|
|
rockclimber919
Feb 25, 2009, 6:18 PM
Post #39 of 66
(3373 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 39
|
think of it this way. how much is your life worth? and your partners life? go out and buy another one. if you buy one every time gear is in question, you'll learn really fucking fast not to drop your gear.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Feb 25, 2009, 6:25 PM
Post #40 of 66
(3367 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
If you decide to retire it, I'll take it. I'll pay shipping.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Feb 25, 2009, 6:30 PM
Post #41 of 66
(3372 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions?
|
|
|
|
|
bigjonnyc
Feb 25, 2009, 6:37 PM
Post #42 of 66
(3363 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 369
|
angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use.
|
|
|
|
|
robbovius
Feb 25, 2009, 7:20 PM
Post #43 of 66
(3339 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406
|
pedro_sandchez wrote: So this weekend I dropped my petzl reverso and attache about 60ish feet. Not sure how it happened, I'm guessing part of my shirt got caught in the gate when I clipped it to my harness because when I reached up to unlock a different biner, i heard it unclip and fall. Bassically, it slid down a slabby face and then dropped off the vertical face. My partner down below saw it happen and tried to catch it. It bounced off of his palm and landed in the dirt at his feet. It didn't land directly on rock or anything just in the dirt. I am convinced it is totally safe in that it didn't impact any rock at the base of the climb. My partner on the other hand is skeptical. I just wanted to get some other opinions. Thanks Oh jesus tap-dancing CHRIST! n00bs. re:STFU. I dropped a Faders belay plate down 4 pitches of Mt webster last august. tink, tink, boink, tink, tink...it went down off into the distance. later that day when I got back to the base I put it back on my rack, no matter that the corners were all scratched up. "I dropped my belaydevice/carabiner/nut/whatever! is it safe?" duh. candyasses. in order for your belay device or carabiner to be damaged after falling, you'd have to also bash the shit out of it with big heavy stones until it looked like it wouldn't pass the rope any more. OMFG this myth is tha fattest load of squash ever. its a squash and corn burrito in godzilla's pants.
(This post was edited by robbovius on Feb 25, 2009, 7:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 25, 2009, 7:50 PM
Post #44 of 66
(3325 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. Oh, if it's got a visible crack in the main body, I bet it'd break no problem from a hard fall. adatesman - I've got more old ATCs than I know what to do with, wanna flex one til you can get it to crack, then destroy it in a slow pull test on a rope through it to see how much force it takes to explode it? GO PS microfractures in dropped gear are a myth.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Feb 25, 2009, 8:43 PM
Post #45 of 66
(3312 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
cracklover wrote: bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. Oh, if it's got a visible crack in the main body, I bet it'd break no problem from a hard fall. adatesman - I've got more old ATCs than I know what to do with, wanna flex one til you can get it to crack, then destroy it in a slow pull test on a rope through it to see how much force it takes to explode it? GO PS microfractures in dropped gear are a myth. In what scenario is this even a possibility? An atc or reverso "flexing" to metal fatigue? When does this happen? "Exploding" belay devices? Jesus Christ, can't we use some common sense for a minute? Bash the shit out of your atc with a hammer for a couple of minutes and then send it to ad. If he can still get one through the holes, I bet any rope breaks every single time before the device fails. Tell you what - I'm climbing tonight. If I have my extra atc with me, I will hit it a couple of times with a hammer, drive my car over it, and drop a small boulder on top of it if I can find one. That's at least as bad as dropping it 60 feet into the dirt, doncha think? I'll inspect it, and if it looks good, I'll have someone belay me with it. If it looks like it's been compromised, I'll send it to adatesman along with a piece of rope for testing.
|
|
|
|
|
bigjonnyc
Feb 25, 2009, 8:45 PM
Post #46 of 66
(3310 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 369
|
cracklover wrote: bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. Oh, if it's got a visible crack in the main body, I bet it'd break no problem from a hard fall. adatesman - I've got more old ATCs than I know what to do with, wanna flex one til you can get it to crack, then destroy it in a slow pull test on a rope through it to see how much force it takes to explode it? GO PS microfractures in dropped gear are a myth. I too would like to see this test. Since we're talking about a crack/fracture in the aluminum due to an impact, maybe hit it with a hammer to crack it instead of pull flexing it to get a crack to start with. Or, to be more repeatable, you could just use a hacksaw and cut it clean through on one side? Then see what force you have to pull on a rope threaded through it to break it. I'm also curious of the actual forces seen in the rope where it enters the belay device when catching a fall. I can't imagine it's that large, even on a reasonably big fall, say factor 0.75 or so. Think of the whiplash a belayer would take if the rope pulled with like a 1000 lbs. You've also gotta factor in slippage through the device, all the friction of the rope through each piece of gear, the fact that the belayer is not a fixed point, but moves when catching a fall, etc. All together I just don't think that it would add up to enough to rupture the device. However, please don't believe for a moment I'd be stupid enough to use a belay device with a big crack in it.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 25, 2009, 11:25 PM
Post #47 of 66
(3291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
justroberto wrote: cracklover wrote: bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. Oh, if it's got a visible crack in the main body, I bet it'd break no problem from a hard fall. adatesman - I've got more old ATCs than I know what to do with, wanna flex one til you can get it to crack, then destroy it in a slow pull test on a rope through it to see how much force it takes to explode it? GO PS microfractures in dropped gear are a myth. In what scenario is this even a possibility? An atc or reverso "flexing" to metal fatigue? When does this happen? Never. Duh. The question wasn't "how could you get a visible crack in your device by dropping it?" Because you couldn't. You could drop it off El Cap, the device doesn't have enough mass to hit with enough impact to hurt itself that much. But again, that wasn't the point.
In reply to: "Exploding" belay devices? Jesus Christ, can't we use some common sense for a minute? Well, I think it would at least make a loud "ping" sound when it broke at the crack. "Exploding" is a relative term.
In reply to: Bash the shit out of your atc with a hammer for a couple of minutes and then send it to ad. If he can still get one through the holes, I bet any rope breaks every single time before the device fails. That's not the question. Bash it with a hammer and all you're going to do is flatten it. In order to get a visible crack, you'll have to stress it until it cracks. This was your hypothesis - I didn't come up with it. You said:
In reply to: even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use.
In reply to: Tell you what - I'm climbing tonight. If I have my extra atc with me, I will hit it a couple of times with a hammer, drive my car over it, and drop a small boulder on top of it if I can find one. That's at least as bad as dropping it 60 feet into the dirt, doncha think? I'll inspect it, and if it looks good, I'll have someone belay me with it. If it looks like it's been compromised, I'll send it to adatesman along with a piece of rope for testing. Again, irrelevant. I think I stated my experiment pretty clearly, and I think it would prove or disprove your statment perfectly well. Apparently rather than stand behind your statement, you feel the need to obfuscate it. GO
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Feb 26, 2009, 12:04 AM
Post #48 of 66
(3283 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
USnavy wrote: ... Consider this. Black Diamond themselves specifically state that dropped carabiners are likely safe to use if the gate action is good and there is no visible damage to the carabiner on their website. if you can drop a carabiner from such a height as to damage the one on the website, i'll go over there and create a multpitch crag on hawaii for you!!
|
|
|
|
|
altelis
Feb 26, 2009, 12:20 AM
Post #50 of 66
(3272 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168
|
better. though i wasn't so much trying to give you a hard time as just pointing out the funny phrasing used.
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Feb 26, 2009, 12:25 AM
Post #51 of 66
(1512 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
cracklover wrote: Never. Duh. The question wasn't "how could you get a visible crack in your device by dropping it?" Because you couldn't. You could drop it off El Cap, the device doesn't have enough mass to hit with enough impact to hurt itself that much. But again, that wasn't the point. That's right.... coz we don't see ants and beetles running around complaining about microfractures when they topple off a crag.... they just keep plodding on.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 26, 2009, 2:40 AM
Post #53 of 66
(1486 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
rockclimber919 wrote: think of it this way. how much is your life worth? and your partners life? go out and buy another one. Good partners aren't exactly a dime a dozen. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 26, 2009, 2:51 AM
Post #54 of 66
(1481 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. I thought about it a moment and think that the force on a belay device locally might be around 1.3 times the tension in the rope. I don't think I'd trust a cracked belay device. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Feb 26, 2009, 3:12 AM
Post #55 of 66
(1476 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
USnavy wrote: If the OP dropped the carabiner 60 feet and it hit his partner’s hand and landed in the dirt its ultra likely that its fine. Doesn't it depend on how hard his hand is? I mean, we are talking climber's hands, right?
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Feb 26, 2009, 3:38 AM
Post #56 of 66
(1472 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
jt512 wrote: bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. I thought about it a moment and think that the force on a belay device locally might be around 1.3 times the tension in the rope. I don't think I'd trust a cracked belay device. Jay I wouldn't either. I still wonder if it'd break before the rope though. Who's sending Adatesman the sabotaged device. I might if there's not already one in the mail to him.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Feb 26, 2009, 4:13 AM
Post #57 of 66
(1464 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
cracklover wrote: justroberto wrote: cracklover wrote: bigjonnyc wrote: angry wrote: Is there a report, ever, of a tube style belay device breaking? Under any conditions? This is exactly what I've been thinking while reading this thread. All your belay device does is provide friction in the setup. If you take a moment to think about the actual forces induced upon it, common sense says that even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. Oh, if it's got a visible crack in the main body, I bet it'd break no problem from a hard fall. adatesman - I've got more old ATCs than I know what to do with, wanna flex one til you can get it to crack, then destroy it in a slow pull test on a rope through it to see how much force it takes to explode it? GO PS microfractures in dropped gear are a myth. In what scenario is this even a possibility? An atc or reverso "flexing" to metal fatigue? When does this happen? Never. Duh. The question wasn't "how could you get a visible crack in your device by dropping it?" Because you couldn't. You could drop it off El Cap, the device doesn't have enough mass to hit with enough impact to hurt itself that much. But again, that wasn't the point. In reply to: "Exploding" belay devices? Jesus Christ, can't we use some common sense for a minute? Well, I think it would at least make a loud "ping" sound when it broke at the crack. "Exploding" is a relative term. In reply to: Bash the shit out of your atc with a hammer for a couple of minutes and then send it to ad. If he can still get one through the holes, I bet any rope breaks every single time before the device fails. That's not the question. Bash it with a hammer and all you're going to do is flatten it. In order to get a visible crack, you'll have to stress it until it cracks. This was your hypothesis - I didn't come up with it. You said:
In reply to: even if if did have a visible crack in it, it'd probably still not "break" during use. In reply to: Tell you what - I'm climbing tonight. If I have my extra atc with me, I will hit it a couple of times with a hammer, drive my car over it, and drop a small boulder on top of it if I can find one. That's at least as bad as dropping it 60 feet into the dirt, doncha think? I'll inspect it, and if it looks good, I'll have someone belay me with it. If it looks like it's been compromised, I'll send it to adatesman along with a piece of rope for testing. Again, irrelevant. I think I stated my experiment pretty clearly, and I think it would prove or disprove your statment perfectly well. Apparently rather than stand behind your statement, you feel the need to obfuscate it. GO Actually, I didn't say that, bigjohnnyc did, and you've even quoted it as such. Thanks for misquoting me, though. You should give me more credit than that, and I'm not obfuscating anything I've previously said. My point stands: You'd have to be a complete fucking idiot to do anything that would cause an atc to break under normal (or even pretty extreme) usage. You would have to willfully destroy it. The test you propose doesn't mean anything because there is absolutely no chance it would ever get used in that circumstance. I'm actually more curious to "accidentally" run over mine and see if it even flattens or causes me to question its integrity. Why does the topic of climbing gear safety turn everyone into chicken-fucking-little?
|
|
|
|
|
JimTitt
Feb 26, 2009, 11:11 AM
Post #58 of 66
(1439 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002
|
In reply to: I thought about it a moment and think that the force on a belay device locally might be around 1.3 times the tension in the rope. I don't think I'd trust a cracked belay device. Looks like it´s more the other way round, I calculated the load across the plate at 0.674 of the faller rope tension. If I get time in the morning I might even measure it.
|
|
|
|
|
qtm
Feb 26, 2009, 3:10 PM
Post #59 of 66
(1418 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2004
Posts: 548
|
While I wasn't concerned about "microfractures", the bouncing off the rock created some sharp burrs on the outside. Not a structural issue, but I was concerned about the burrs slicing the sheath if the rope ran over it under pressure, like on rap. I wanted an ATC Guide anyway so I retired it. Since then I've filed away the burrs (so as not to scratch any of the books on the shelf where I put it). I could probably grind away the rough spots as well; if I didn't buy the Guide I'd still be using it.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 26, 2009, 3:18 PM
Post #60 of 66
(1412 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Hey JustRoberto, you're right, I confused you with bigjonnyc. He's the one that's (probably) wrong, you're just the one foaming at the mouth at the thought of me and adatesman having a little fun while destroying a device. Angry - I'm still waiting to hear back from adatesman. If he's willing to do the test I proposed (I'm even willing to take the time to put the crack in the device before I send it to him) then I'll mail him one of my ATCs. GO
|
|
|
|
|
robbovius
Feb 26, 2009, 3:27 PM
Post #61 of 66
(1406 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406
|
qtm wrote: While I wasn't concerned about "microfractures", the bouncing off the rock created some sharp burrs on the outside. Not a structural issue, but I was concerned about the burrs slicing the sheath if the rope ran over it under pressure, like on rap. I wanted an ATC Guide anyway so I retired it. Since then I've filed away the burrs (so as not to scratch any of the books on the shelf where I put it). I could probably grind away the rough spots as well; if I didn't buy the Guide I'd still be using it. application of 420 or 600 grit aluminum oxide sandpaper, and you've got yourself a spare.
|
|
|
|
|
armsrforclimbing
Feb 26, 2009, 3:41 PM
Post #62 of 66
(1400 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 214
|
Does anyone remember that scene from "Scanners" when that dude's head exploded? Thats how I feel right now.
|
|
|
|
|
bigjonnyc
Feb 26, 2009, 3:43 PM
Post #63 of 66
(1400 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 369
|
cracklover wrote: Hey JustRoberto, you're right, I confused you with bigjonnyc. He's the one that's (probably) wrong, you're just the one foaming at the mouth at the thought of me and adatesman having a little fun while destroying a device. Angry - I'm still waiting to hear back from adatesman. If he's willing to do the test I proposed (I'm even willing to take the time to put the crack in the device before I send it to him) then I'll mail him one of my ATCs. GO As I clarified in my second post, I'm not talking about a crack propagated from cyclic fatigue. I'm talking about one from and impact on the device, such as one that may or may not appear via dropping it from a significant height onto a hard surface. If aluminum is too malleable to be subject to such a fracture, so be it. I stand by my original statement however, that if a visible crack is found on the side of belay device, I do not believe enough force would be induced on it when catching a fall for the device to completely fail. Edited to add ambiguity as my claim is based on no circumstantial evidence.
(This post was edited by bigjonnyc on Feb 26, 2009, 3:50 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
robbovius
Feb 26, 2009, 3:46 PM
Post #64 of 66
(1395 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406
|
armsrforclimbing wrote: Does anyone remember that scene from "Scanners" when that dude's head exploded? Thats how I feel right now. oh my head exploded long ago, around 1998. just let it happen. its really quite a relief.
|
|
|
|
|
qtm
Feb 26, 2009, 4:07 PM
Post #65 of 66
(1386 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2004
Posts: 548
|
robbovius wrote: qtm wrote: While I wasn't concerned about "microfractures", the bouncing off the rock created some sharp burrs on the outside. Not a structural issue, but I was concerned about the burrs slicing the sheath if the rope ran over it under pressure, like on rap. I wanted an ATC Guide anyway so I retired it. Since then I've filed away the burrs (so as not to scratch any of the books on the shelf where I put it). I could probably grind away the rough spots as well; if I didn't buy the Guide I'd still be using it. application of 420 or 600 grit aluminum oxide sandpaper, and you've got yourself a spare. Sure. But then I'd have noobs and gym staff telling me it's not safe. Which I suppose *could* be true; I don't want to argue the point with people so I just have another, shiny device as a spare.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 26, 2009, 4:10 PM
Post #66 of 66
(1382 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jt512 wrote: I thought about it a moment and think that the force on a belay device locally might be around 1.3 times the tension in the rope. I don't think I'd trust a cracked belay device. Jay It might be significantly less. Not sure. Keep in mind that the brake-strand side is only exerting around 1/6 the force. GO
|
|
|
|
|
|