Forums: Community: Campground:
clarkson and top gear
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 12:08 PM
Post #1 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

clarkson and top gear
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Similarly, he offended Americans by removing the map of the USA and renaming the resultant space the 'South Canada Sea'.

:lol:

terrific.

No offense to the americans that read this but I thought the concept was hilarious!


Partner tradman


Nov 1, 2006, 12:16 PM
Post #2 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

You should hear what he has to say about american cars.

Now that really will offend americans!

:wink:


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 12:36 PM
Post #3 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You should hear what he has to say about american cars.

Now that really will offend americans!

:wink:

i know!!! :lol:

is everyone on your little island like this??!!!


:D


Partner tradman


Nov 1, 2006, 12:51 PM
Post #4 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

You mean, are they incredibly snobbish about european cars?

Too right!

Top Gear makes a point of reviewing (and slating) seriously rubbish US cars like the Dodge Caliber but pretty much avoids nice stuff like the Corvette Z06.

Makes us feel all warm and cosy by avoiding the real truth - that we're bizarrely performance-obssessed and our cars are impractical, unbelievably expensive and frankly quite dull for the most part.

:wink:


charley


Nov 1, 2006, 1:18 PM
Post #5 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 13, 2002
Posts: 6627

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You should hear what he has to say about american cars.

Now that really will offend americans!

:wink:

What does he have to say about canadian cars? :?: Oh, you don't have any. You just make american cars up there,eh. :lol:


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 1:25 PM
Post #6 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
You should hear what he has to say about american cars.

Now that really will offend americans!

:wink:

What does he have to say about canadian cars? :?: Oh, you don't have any. You just make american cars up there,eh. :lol:

we make some japanese cars, too.

but it doesn't matter where the american cars are made, they are still shit, with some exceptions.



PostPosted: 01 Nov 2006 12:51 Post subject: Re: clarkson and top gear
You mean, are they incredibly snobbish about european cars?

In reply to:
Too right!

Top Gear makes a point of reviewing (and slating) seriously rubbish US cars like the Dodge Caliber but pretty much avoids nice stuff like the Corvette Z06.

Makes us feel all warm and cosy by avoiding the real truth - that we're bizarrely performance-obssessed and our cars are impractical, unbelievably expensive and frankly quite dull for the most part.

Lotus seems to make some nice cars. TVR was british, yes??? russian owned, before they went under??

Dodge caliber is just plain terrible. My girlfriends father won one in a contest, and he wants to keep it. But it's just balls. ugly, no boot, no power, no handling. why the hell would someone buy one of those??? Oh, wait, it has a beer cooler in the glove box..... :roll:

And top gear did, in fact, no avoid the C06 Vette. They gave it a good review, really! The engine for that car, AFAIK, is built 15 miles from my house! They also liked the new viper, even though they said it was also rubbish. Clarkson said it was a boat but he still wanted one.


lagr01


Nov 1, 2006, 1:45 PM
Post #7 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2005
Posts: 2417

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I like Top Gear, I have a hard time undestanding what they say sometimes though, they sound like they have a potato stuck in their throats.


Partner tradman


Nov 1, 2006, 2:08 PM
Post #8 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Lotus seems to make some nice cars. TVR was british, yes??? russian owned, before they went under??

Lotus have a couple of good ones out, the Elise and the Exige. They're go-karts really; amazing handling and a ton of fun but to be absolutely honest they're not that fast.

TVR was british, yes. A friend of mine owned a TVR Griffith 500 - scary powerful cars with no ABS or traction control.

In reply to:
And top gear did, in fact, no avoid the C06 Vette. They gave it a good review, really!

Oh right, sorry. Must have missed the review. Wouldn't mind a blast in one, I haven't had a go yet but they look great!


traddad


Nov 1, 2006, 2:25 PM
Post #9 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

American cars are for shit and the US car companies are going to reap what they planted.
Of course, Chimpy McFlopsweat is going to meet with the US auto makers after the election to address the situation....It's probably going do entail high tariffs or outright embargoes of foreign car companies...rather than actually building a good product that people want.
It is our way.


overlord


Nov 1, 2006, 2:49 PM
Post #10 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

i LOVE that show. IMHO the only car show worht watching.

anyway, wasnt clarkson seriously hurt not that long ago? does this mean that hes alive and kicking again?


Partner tradman


Nov 1, 2006, 2:51 PM
Post #11 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
American cars are for shit and the US car companies are going to reap what they planted.
Of course, Chimpy McFlopsweat is going to meet with the US auto makers after the election to address the situation....It's probably going do entail high tariffs or outright embargoes of foreign car companies...rather than actually building a good product that people want.
It is our way.

I'm not so sure.

I've found discussions about cars here very interesting. Europeans as a general rule just look for different things in their cars to americans.

Europeans are very performance obssessed. The first thing about a car after make and model of car that someone will ask is what size of engine it has, how fast it does 0-60 and what its top speed is. Economy and price are a distant afterthought.

Americans seem size-obssessed. From what I've seen here and on the web in ads etc, big is good in American cars. Big trucks with plenty of setas, beer coolers, TVs, playstations, all that.

But in both cases, its just a case of good ideas taken to a high pitch of impracticality. Good performance does make a car pleasant to drive: it makes overtaking easier, makes the car safer at normal speeds, improves cornering and just makes it more fun to drive the beast. But do I really need a car which can do 0-60 in 4 seconds and break 180mph, in a country where the highest speed limit is 70?

Similarly, a big car makes getting your family around easy, holds your climbing gear without cramming (and believe me, european cars are seriously inconvenient when a big expedition is on) and makes being in it comfortable and relaxing. But do we really need a hummer so big we can park other cars underneath it?

We live in affluent societies. We have a habit of doing what we like more than is good for us. It's only when the doc says we have to slim down and live lean for our own health that we listen.


Partner tradman


Nov 1, 2006, 2:54 PM
Post #12 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
i LOVE that show. IMHO the only car show worht watching.

anyway, wasnt clarkson seriously hurt not that long ago? does this mean that hes alive and kicking again?

That wasn't Clarkson, that was Richard Hammond, his co-presenter on the show. Crashed a jet-powered dragster at 300mph. He's much better now, but you know what it's like after a close call!


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 3:14 PM
Post #13 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I like Top Gear, I have a hard time undestanding what they say sometimes though, they sound like they have a potato stuck in their throats.

yeah, it takes some time to get the accent, i guess.


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 3:19 PM
Post #14 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Lotus seems to make some nice cars. TVR was british, yes??? russian owned, before they went under??

Lotus have a couple of good ones out, the Elise and the Exige. They're go-karts really; amazing handling and a ton of fun but to be absolutely honest they're not that fast.

TVR was british, yes. A friend of mine owned a TVR Griffith 500 - scary powerful cars with no ABS or traction control.

In reply to:
And top gear did, in fact, no avoid the C06 Vette. They gave it a good review, really!

Oh right, sorry. Must have missed the review. Wouldn't mind a blast in one, I haven't had a go yet but they look great!

I agree about lotus being go karts. I wish i could drive one, though. And no, they aren't fast as in american fast - straight line fast. But who cares when you can corner!!!???

TVR's do look scary on all accounts! that sagaris is supposed to be good.

In reply to:
American cars are for shit and the US car companies are going to reap what they planted.
Of course, Chimpy McFlopsweat is going to meet with the US auto makers after the election to address the situation....It's probably going do entail high tariffs or outright embargoes of foreign car companies...rather than actually building a good product that people want.
It is our way.

this is true. it's like adding more police to keep people from offending.

I'm sure we could build good cars if we didn't pay autoworkers SO MUCH MONEY to, in some cases, sleep on the job.


traddad


Nov 1, 2006, 3:24 PM
Post #15 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
American cars are for s--- and the US car companies are going to reap what they planted.
Of course, Chimpy McFlopsweat is going to meet with the US auto makers after the election to address the situation....It's probably going do entail high tariffs or outright embargoes of foreign car companies...rather than actually building a good product that people want.
It is our way.

I'm not so sure.

I've found discussions about cars here very interesting. Europeans as a general rule just look for different things in their cars to americans.

We live in affluent societies. We have a habit of doing what we like more than is good for us. It's only when the doc says we have to slim down and live lean for our own health that we listen.

I think you’re correct in that US cars reflect our dominant culture. To wit: American cars are bloated, overpriced, hazardous to your health, tarted up gas huffers with bolted on accessories that fall apart as soon as they have a few miles on them….Just like the prostitute that stands across the street from where I work.


atg200


Nov 1, 2006, 3:25 PM
Post #16 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thankfully the pendulum seems to be swinging the other way with Americans and giant cars now. At a dealership, they'll give you 0% interest and all kinds of gimmicks to get you to buy a bigass SUV, but there is a three month wait list for a Prius - and if you try to haggle you get laughed at.

The car I really don't understand and think is the most stupid vehicle ever made is the Mini. That thing gets the same gas mileage as a Subaru Outback, and it touts fuel efficiency? My Prius gets nearly double the gas mileage the Mini does, is bigger, and is much safer. The Mini and the Hummer are just opposite takes on the same "image is everything" approach to car design.


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 3:51 PM
Post #17 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
American cars are for s--- and the US car companies are going to reap what they planted.
Of course, Chimpy McFlopsweat is going to meet with the US auto makers after the election to address the situation....It's probably going do entail high tariffs or outright embargoes of foreign car companies...rather than actually building a good product that people want.
It is our way.

I'm not so sure.

I've found discussions about cars here very interesting. Europeans as a general rule just look for different things in their cars to americans.

We live in affluent societies. We have a habit of doing what we like more than is good for us. It's only when the doc says we have to slim down and live lean for our own health that we listen.

I think you’re correct in that US cars reflect our dominant culture. To wit: American cars are bloated, overpriced, hazardous to your health, tarted up gas huffers with bolted on accessories that fall apart as soon as they have a few miles on them….Just like the prostitute that stands across the street from where I work.

it didn't seem to be that way before, though (not that i'm old enough to really know "before") but look at old chev vans. A friend of my dads had one with one MILLION miles on it.
it was a work van. Driven lots daily, and it was fine.

diesel jetta's will get 400000km on them, but what else can you drive like that these days?


robbovius


Nov 1, 2006, 3:55 PM
Post #18 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I don't find automotive discussions here to be particularly interesting, in that they most often parrot stereotypes and typical prejudices. few converstaions about cars hereabouts show any real depth of understanding of the technologies, actual vehicular dynamics, competitive driving experience, or automotive histories.

blanketing american cars as "shit" or "Seriously rubbish" is absolutist generalized nonsense, as much as anyone claiming that peugeots are all unreliable, or that Lotuses are all fragile (well, maybe all the OLD ones ;-) ) Most people cling to regional and marque-based prejudices about automobiles, with out realizing that right now, we live is a fricken GOLDEN AGE... you fairly can't buy a truly bad car anymore, unless you get something from one of the mainland chinese brands. the things people complain about, and use to denigrate the average car's performance or reliability are such nitsas to be complete non-issues in any meaningful sense.

I mean, I've got a 12 year old Ford Escort Wagon with 170,000+ miles on it, that I paidf $400 for. it starts up every day in all sorts of weather, passes both safety and emissions inspections regularly with only the most basioc maintenance, is easy to work on, runs smoothly, is fundamentally rust free, and is faster, quicker, handles better, and stops harder (even on it's aged suspension bits) than a couple of the "real" sportscars I've owned in the past. exactly how is that "shit"?

it has been my observation that those drivers who complain most about cars having "no power", aren't particularly skilled at competitive driving, and lack any meaningful ability at conservation of momentum in cornering, rather relying on engine power to pull them out after slowing down too much for the corner.

During the several years I competed in autocrossing, I saw all sorts of cars on the grids, american, european, japanese, new, old, boneyard cobble-ups, top-shelf race only specials, everything. It was all good times. I've got some digivids of me competing in my old Z28 some where...VERY good times. Racing karts was ultimately more fun though, because of the greater seat time. got a couple trophies, there, too. even won me a couple heat races!

tradman, I'll definitely agree with you that absolute performance is meaningless on the street. Engine power, and the performance numbers of any particular car are simply statistics that posers can trot out in the usual posturing for dominance.


robbovius


Nov 1, 2006, 4:01 PM
Post #19 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

it didn't seem to be that way before, though (not that i'm old enough to really know "before")

No, you fuckin DON'T know before...cars today are several orders of magnitude better than anything produced up until the just about the late 1980s. trrust me.


In reply to:

but look at old chev vans. A friend of my dads had one with one MILLION miles on it.
it was a work van. Driven lots daily, and it was fine.

diesel jetta's will get 400000km on them, but what else can you drive like that these days?


phhhhht, any fucking car you WANT, american or otherwise. is everyone retarded? in the 1960s, if a car had 50,000 miles on it, that was HIGH mileage, and it was expected to need major repairs soon.

now, pretty much anycar you buy will go 150,000 - 200,000 miles with only ordinary maintnenance.

I'm tellin' ya, we are in an automotve golden age, for real.

the stereotype that american are all driving gas-guzzling SUVs is Bullshit, BTW, and all you've got to do to figure that out is look at the cars driving down the road around you every day.


traddad


Nov 1, 2006, 4:08 PM
Post #20 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Thankfully the pendulum seems to be swinging the other way with Americans and giant cars now. At a dealership, they'll give you 0% interest and all kinds of gimmicks to get you to buy a bigass SUV, but there is a three month wait list for a Prius - and if you try to haggle you get laughed at.

The car I really don't understand and think is the most stupid vehicle ever made is the Mini. That thing gets the same gas mileage as a Subaru Outback, and it touts fuel efficiency? My Prius gets nearly double the gas mileage the Mini does, is bigger, and is much safer. The Mini and the Hummer are just opposite takes on the same "image is everything" approach to car design.

ATG, You need to do your homework. The 2006 MINI is 4 stars across the board (except for a too small back seat) on the NHTSA ratings. The only area where the 2006 Prius bests it is the back seat. As for gas milage, the Subaru Forrester and Outbacks get 23/28 and the MINI gets 28/36.

The MINI also goes like stink and handles like it’s on rails.


traddad


Nov 1, 2006, 4:26 PM
Post #21 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
the stereotype that american are all driving gas-guzzling SUVs is s---, BTW, and all you've got to do to figure that out is look at the cars driving down the road around you every day.
You obviously do not live in Phoenix, AZ. SUVs and stupidly huge trucks everywhere.
As for quality, I'll give it to you from the mouth of a GM prototype machinist that took early retirement (in a cost cutting measure) a couple years back. He said that the "cost engineers" are running the show now. The bottom line is not how good the car is but the profit margin. GM has cut WAY back on testing (they now run the car 5000 miles and model the rest) and consequently, our GM work trucks are falling apart under us before 100,000 miles. On one we have had to weld the bed 5 times. Brakes, suspension, electrics...we've had trouble with everything.
But hey, nice cup holders, though.


atg200


Nov 1, 2006, 4:28 PM
Post #22 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 5:31 PM
Post #23 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:

it didn't seem to be that way before, though (not that i'm old enough to really know "before")

No, you f--- DON'T know before...cars today are several orders of magnitude better than anything produced up until the just about the late 1980s. trrust me.


In reply to:

but look at old chev vans. A friend of my dads had one with one MILLION miles on it.
it was a work van. Driven lots daily, and it was fine.

diesel jetta's will get 400000km on them, but what else can you drive like that these days?


phhhhht, any f---ing car you WANT, american or otherwise. is everyone retarded? in the 1960s, if a car had 50,000 miles on it, that was HIGH mileage, and it was expected to need major repairs soon.

now, pretty much anycar you buy will go 150,000 - 200,000 miles with only ordinary maintnenance.

I'm tellin' ya, we are in an automotve golden age, for real.

the stereotype that american are all driving gas-guzzling SUVs is s---, BTW, and all you've got to do to figure that out is look at the cars driving down the road around you every day.

:lol:

i was TALKING ABOUT 1980's cars. I should have specified "before" i guess. hell, almost half the cars from the 80's were before my time.

and yes, i understand that things start going after so many miles or years.

your escort was and is regarded quite highly as cars go. A buddy has the same thing - his escort (had it's suspension given a once over and replaced this and that) outperforms the focus he got with ease (as long as the clutch doesn't explode).


I think my point is that if you were to choose an american car these days over a honda, toyota, or even a hyundai, what would you pick? pontiac G6 or an accord or civic???

hell, even look at american trucks. Chev....ask chossmonkey how his diff sounds.


Partner brent_e


Nov 1, 2006, 5:35 PM
Post #24 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.


but maybe if you drove the mini like you drive your outback would get you even better mileage in it??

regardless of that, i'd take the damn outback. AWD kicks ass (buddy has an 05 STi....EEEE GAD that thing is fast!!!)

Brent


gritstoner


Nov 2, 2006, 10:45 AM
Post #25 of 49 (1296 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 1, 2003
Posts: 529

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.

sorry just got to point this out.
The Mini Cooper and Cooper "S" were sportier versions that were successful as rally cars, winning the Monte Carlo Rally three times.
yep, thats right, you can take the mini off road and it will do fine in most places.


gritstoner


Nov 2, 2006, 10:45 AM
Post #26 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 1, 2003
Posts: 529

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.

sorry just got to point this out.
The Mini Cooper and Cooper "S" were sportier versions that were successful as rally cars, winning the Monte Carlo Rally three times.
yep, thats right, you can take the mini off road and it will do fine in most places.


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:22 PM
Post #27 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You obviously do not live in Phoenix, AZ. SUVs and stupidly huge trucks everywhere.

true, I don't. but neither do you live here, where, even though i can go outside a see a plethora of SUVs and trucks of all sizes all over the proverbial "everywhere" by no means are they the only vehicle tyope on the road, or even the majority...unless you're at a horse show, or construction site.

I'd wager that they arent the only vehicles on the road down your way as well.

In reply to:
As for quality, I'll give it to you from the mouth of a GM prototype machinist that took early retirement (in a cost cutting measure) a couple years back. He said that the "cost engineers" are running the show now. The bottom line is not how good the car is but the profit margin.

...and, how is this NOT the case with every fricken car company on the planet? unless I'm mistaken, they're all producing cars with the idea of making money at it, and their collective bottom lines are all about the cha-ching at the end of the day.

In reply to:
GM has cut WAY back on testing (they now run the car 5000 miles and model the rest) and consequently, our GM work trucks are falling apart under us before 100,000 miles. On one we have had to weld the bed 5 times. Brakes, suspension, electrics...we've had trouble with everything.
But hey, nice cup holders, though.

the usage environment of trucks used for commercial enterprises is especially tough, so it's no surprise really, but, can you compare with how other trucks would hold up? do you have other brands in your work fleet? exactly what the hell were you carrying that damaged the bed so badly it needed to be re-welded 5 times?

I'd wager it'd be easy for me to find others who've owned GM pickups that haven't had you're problems.

It has been my observation that it's equally easy to find people who will praise a car, as it is to find people who will bash the very same vehicle, and that those personal opinions depend largely on the personal experience of the person doing the bashing. it has also been my experience that it's popular to bash american cars, whether or not it's deserved


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:30 PM
Post #28 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.

sorry just got to point this out.
The Mini Cooper and Cooper "S" were sportier versions that were successful as rally cars, winning the Monte Carlo Rally three times.
yep, thats right, you can take the mini off road and it will do fine in most places.

To Clarify:

Gritstoner is talking about the orignal 1960s BMC (Alec Issingonis-designed) Mini, as modified by brit John Cooper's race car and performance tuner company, NOT the current BMW-built car.


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #29 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
your escort was and is regarded quite highly as cars go.

really? then you've never read the plethora of negative comments that have surrounded it since it's introduction in 1982. I had a 1984 Esacoprt GT. it was such an unreliable shitbox that one day, after 95,000 miles of agony, I got out my gas torch, fired it up, and then cut the car up into pieces in my driveway and had it hauled away, so that no other por soul would ever be able to drive it. (true story)

In reply to:
A buddy has the same thing - his escort (had it's suspension given a once over and replaced this and that) outperforms the focus he got with ease (as long as the clutch doesn't explode).

and, exaactly what abuse was he heaping on it that damaged the clutch? that's not a fault of the car.

In reply to:
I think my point is that if you were to choose an american car these days over a honda, toyota, or even a hyundai, what would you pick? pontiac G6 or an accord or civic???

Chevy HHR. I think they look cool, and they're on the Cobalt platform, which seems fairly robust.
hell, even look at american trucks. Chev....ask chossmonkey how his diff sounds.

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 1:53 PM
Post #30 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 2:09 PM
Post #31 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

was there a recall?

In reply to:

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!

on a rainy day, like today, and bored at work, it's good times going on about cars. ;-)


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 3:23 PM
Post #32 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Comparing the Mini and a Subaru is comparing apples and oranges.

Subaru's are designed and marketed as outdoor adventure machines, family oriented AWD fun etc.

The Mini is a performance oriented (albeit handling/stopping power more than break neck speed) urban/communter vehicle.

You can't tell me that the Mini's image marketign is any more prevalent than that of Subaru's. This site is a perfect example of that. Try bad mouthing Subaru's or toyota trucks in this community and you'll be met with a throng of violent objections.

The benefit of the Mini (and even the Smart car) is that they are enjoyable to drive but at the same time they are more socially/environmentally concious choices than an SUV or truck for everyday use. have you ever tried to park a full sized vehicle in an urban core area? Considering that most of us do 95% of our driving on perfectly acceptable roads in decent weather, there is no reason for us to have a big vehicle. Why justify the extra expenses by saying that you need is for offroad driving when you do it once a week for 20 minutes?

There are definately uses for trucks and SUVs, but the (sub)urban road warrior doesn't fit that profile at all. If North Americans moved to smaller vehicles for our day-to-day uses we'd save gas, reduce emissions, reduce traffic congestion, free up extra parking instead of paving new lots, and reduce damages/injuries when impact accidents happen.


traddad


Nov 2, 2006, 4:36 PM
Post #33 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Comparing the Mini and a Subaru is comparing apples and oranges.

Subaru's are designed and marketed as outdoor adventure machines, family oriented AWD fun etc.

The Mini is a performance oriented (albeit handling/stopping power more than break neck speed) urban/communter vehicle.

You can't tell me that the Mini's image marketign is any more prevalent than that of Subaru's. This site is a perfect example of that. Try bad mouthing Subaru's or toyota trucks in this community and you'll be met with a throng of violent objections.

The benefit of the Mini (and even the Smart car) is that they are enjoyable to drive but at the same time they are more socially/environmentally concious choices than an SUV or truck for everyday use. have you ever tried to park a full sized vehicle in an urban core area? Considering that most of us do 95% of our driving on perfectly acceptable roads in decent weather, there is no reason for us to have a big vehicle. Why justify the extra expenses by saying that you need is for offroad driving when you do it once a week for 20 minutes?

There are definately uses for trucks and SUVs, but the (sub)urban road warrior doesn't fit that profile at all. If North Americans moved to smaller vehicles for our day-to-day uses we'd save gas, reduce emissions, reduce traffic congestion, free up extra parking instead of paving new lots, and reduce damages/injuries when impact accidents happen.

OK I'm sold. Where can I get one cheap? Oh wait....MINIs have one of the best resale values of any car on the road. Did either of us mention that MINIs are actually BMWs?


atg200


Nov 2, 2006, 4:51 PM
Post #34 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

well, i think you are missing my point. the mini is a dumb vehicle for an urban commuter because it doesn't save a whole lot of gas. a standard honda civic get considerably better gas mileage than a mini for a lot less money, and a hybrid like a prius gets nearly double the gas mileage as well as other emissions benefits for roughly the same amount as a mini.

my point is that much like a hummer, the mini offers absolutely no practical advantages in its niche. it confers status and some luxury benefits absolutely no one really needs at a significant environmental cost. if everyone switched from a mini to a standard civic, it would be the same gas use benefit as switching from a hummer to a 4runner. if everyone switched from a mini to a prius, it would be the same gas benefit as switching from a hummer to a mini. at least in the salt lake area, there are billboards along I-15 touting the mini's gas efficiency, and that drives me crazy because the mini is simply not a fuel efficient vehicle - it is a status conferring high performance sports car.

that said, i don't think a mini is nearly as bad as a hummer because they theoretically aren't as dangerous to other drivers. i say theoretically because i rarely see hummers driven down the interstate at 100 mph, but i get passed by mini's like i am standing still on a regular basis.


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 6:52 PM
Post #35 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

You are absolutely right, standard sedan type cars (Corrolla, Civic, Golf/Rabbit etc.) get much better milage and are a better choice overall, however small "performance cars" are a move in the right direction. They are smaller than most of the cars listed, which to me is a great boon to street parking, better on gas than most (not all) larger cars, and are still fun to drive. That's a great motivator in our self-centered society, it's FUN, it's cool, it performs. The thing with Smart cars and Minis is that they still give you that ego stroke. you are driving a BMW or Merc. after all.

Ideally we should all be on solar powered mass transit or living within walking distance of work, but it's not going to happen anytime soon (especially for soemone like me who communte to a rural community for work). hell, let's telecommute! :P


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 7:28 PM
Post #36 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
my point is that much like a hummer, the mini offers absolutely no practical advantages in its niche. sis.

see, from this and previous statements, I would posit that you're not at all a car enthusuiast, and therein lies your inability to understand the mini's role int eh automotive world.

dude, the BMW Mini is a SPORTS CAR. it's practical advantages all hinge around it's performance abilities in speed, handling and braking, and it's niche is 2+2 Sports Coupes. It's a car for enthusiasts, as opposed to a car for folks who share your outlook that cars are mostly appliances. the Mini is a much more "immediate" vehicle than a Prius.

Driven with a light foot, the mini will get excellent mileage, well into the mid 30s Mpg. stomped on, it'll drink it right down, as any vehicle does.

Had I the coin, and the choice, I'd buy the Mini over the Prius, renew my SCCA membership, and take it autcrossing, and use it for the occasional track day. it'd be a BLAST. ;-)


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 7:41 PM
Post #37 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Yep, "fuel economy" is merely an attempted advertising ploy. Their "niche" in the market is exactly as stated above.


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 7:52 PM
Post #38 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

was there a recall?

In reply to:

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!

on a rainy day, like today, and bored at work, it's good times going on about cars. ;-)

i think you could take the truck in and get it fixed free if yours started grinding.


and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 8:01 PM
Post #39 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

Driven with a light foot, the mini will get excellent mileage, well into the mid 30s Mpg. stomped on, it'll drink it right down, as any vehicle does.

exactly.

as a note (saw this also on top gear), the smart car was not the first car in europe to get awards for environmental friendliness......the new merc S class was!! :D kinda strange but apparently it's incredibly efficient (not so much as in fuel mileage but emissions, which seems counter intuitive...).


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 8:14 PM
Post #40 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 8:22 PM
Post #41 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)

so you had a z28? What did you do to it?? I thought those things were boats?!

:D

did it have a 350 in it?


traddad


Nov 2, 2006, 10:57 PM
Post #42 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Had I the coin, and the choice, I'd buy the Mini over the Prius, renew my SCCA membership, and take it autcrossing, and use it for the occasional track day. it'd be a BLAST. ;-)

Amen, Brotha.


chossmonkey


Nov 2, 2006, 11:05 PM
Post #43 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!
Anything to keep from talking about climbing huh? :lol:


Partner brent_e


Nov 3, 2006, 2:37 AM
Post #44 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!
Anything to keep from talking about climbing huh? :lol:

eat it, chossman

:D


krillen


Nov 3, 2006, 1:58 PM
Post #45 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

this is community! There's no climbing talk in community! :mrgreen:


chossmonkey


Nov 3, 2006, 2:58 PM
Post #46 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
this is community! There's no climbing talk in community! :mrgreen:

You obviously have never been in the "brent_e" thread.

Oh, sorry.

We do only talk about Brent's non-climbing life there. :lol:


robbovius


Nov 3, 2006, 7:16 PM
Post #47 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)

so you had a z28? What did you do to it?? I thought those things were boats?!

:D

did it have a 350 in it?

It was a 1987 with the 4bbl 305. not as much hp as the TPI engine, but enough to have plenty of fun. It had the four-speed auto.

since I was autocrossing, I concentrated on the suspension and transmission, and wound up getting a couple neat freebies.
A guy i worked with had been on an SCCA race team in the American Sedan class (which was for pony cars) and had a set of pontiac firebuirg GTA BBS-mesh-style 16x9 rims, which he gave to me. they were different colors two black, one white, and one silver, but I didn't care, they were free!

the car itself had come with the highest level suspension - stiffest factory springs and antiroll bars - and I added a set of Bilstien street/track dampersm whcih REALLY tightened the car up. I swapped out the non-posi read drum brake axle for a posi disc brake unit with 3.23s, and that, ,with the fatter tires really made for some sharp braking. I installed wilwwod proportioning valve and got the brakes to lock up equally all the way around (unlike stock settings where the fronts lock first)

I put a shift kit in the tranny, and fabricated my own shift lever, and drove it with both feet (left foot braking), like a kart.
I replaced the drivers seat with an uphpolstered fiberglass competition bucket and tossed the intertia-reel seatbelt for an aftermarket old-school fully adjstable three point belt.

it was a very tight car, and I had a great time driving it. true, it was a bit of a buckboard, and that solid rear axle wasn't too happy over rough pavement, but man! it s was good times.

I didn't place to highly autocrossing becasue all the guys in my class had newer cars with TPI 350s (meaning, another 60-80 hp than me) and mostly MORE MONEY, and so were able to have a set of street legal autocrossing slicks, whereas I was using goodyear street GTs. still I had a great time. couple times I placed ahead of guys with better cars, ,just by driving more smoothly.

at one of hte events, I knew I wasn;t going to finish int eh money and there was this one turn that was choice for a major powerslide out of it, soooooo, I'd just mash the gas coing out and get all sideways raoring up to the finish ;-) I have some digital video of it somewhere. I'll try to find it.

that odl camaro was every bit as much fun adn rewarding to drive as my mom's 1986 porsche 944, though the 944 was alot more refined in it's dynamics. the Camaro was a big old hot rod that you had to man-handle kinda, but if you gave it positive inputs, it'd do exactly what you wanted.


shakylegs


Nov 3, 2006, 9:08 PM
Post #48 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

*Raises hand*
Um, we have a Mini. If that isn't an urban car, i don't know what is. They're less expensive than the Prius, unless you go for the Cooper S, which is a rocket on wheels.
We get about 35-40 mpg (my Toyota Echo/Yaris gets about 45-50). Solid as hell, can't get pass 100 mph with no vibration, and is really comfortable. The only thing that sucks is that it takes premium gas.


Partner brent_e


Nov 3, 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #49 of 49 (2468 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

It was a 1987 with the 4bbl 305. not as much hp as the TPI engine, but enough to have plenty of fun. It had the four-speed auto.

tuned port injection, i'm assuming. How much HP did you actually have???

In reply to:
since I was autocrossing, I concentrated on the suspension and transmission, and wound up getting a couple neat freebies.
A guy i worked with had been on an SCCA race team in the American Sedan class (which was for pony cars) and had a set of pontiac firebuirg GTA BBS-mesh-style 16x9 rims, which he gave to me. they were different colors two black, one white, and one silver, but I didn't care, they were free!

obviously suspension, yes. FREE RIMS!!! awesome. There are some university raceteams in the states that are designing and building their own Carbon rims (for small scale formula cars)....they are disgustingly nice and light.


In reply to:
the car itself had come with the highest level suspension - stiffest factory springs and antiroll bars - and I added a set of Bilstien street/track dampersm whcih REALLY tightened the car up. I swapped out the non-posi read drum brake axle for a posi disc brake unit with 3.23s, and that, ,with the fatter tires really made for some sharp braking. I installed wilwwod proportioning valve and got the brakes to lock up equally all the way around (unlike stock settings where the fronts lock first)

wilwood makes some nice stuff. We use them on our car, too! braking is a good thing!

In reply to:
I put a shift kit in the tranny, and fabricated my own shift lever, and drove it with both feet (left foot braking), like a kart.
I replaced the drivers seat with an uphpolstered fiberglass competition bucket and tossed the intertia-reel seatbelt for an aftermarket old-school fully adjstable three point belt.

what i'd like you to explain to me is why you had an auto over a manual?

In reply to:
I didn't place to highly autocrossing becasue all the guys in my class had newer cars with TPI 350s (meaning, another 60-80 hp than me) and mostly MORE MONEY, and so were able to have a set of street legal autocrossing slicks, whereas I was using goodyear street GTs. still I had a great time. couple times I placed ahead of guys with better cars, ,just by driving more smoothly.

money makes such a big difference, doesn't it? When my dad was racing he was poor as hell and beat the big boys - great feeling.

In reply to:
at one of hte events, I knew I wasn;t going to finish int eh money and there was this one turn that was choice for a major powerslide out of it, soooooo, I'd just mash the gas coing out and get all sideways raoring up to the finish ;-) I have some digital video of it somewhere. I'll try to find it.

if you find it i would like to see that! Slowest way around a corner, though!! :lol:

In reply to:
that odl camaro was every bit as much fun adn rewarding to drive as my mom's 1986 porsche 944, though the 944 was alot more refined in it's dynamics. the Camaro was a big old hot rod that you had to man-handle kinda, but if you gave it positive inputs, it'd do exactly what you wanted.

"positive imputs" :lol:

as in, saw on the wheel like mad???


Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook