Forums: Community: Campground:
clarkson and top gear
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


gritstoner


Nov 2, 2006, 10:45 AM
Post #26 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 1, 2003
Posts: 529

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.

sorry just got to point this out.
The Mini Cooper and Cooper "S" were sportier versions that were successful as rally cars, winning the Monte Carlo Rally three times.
yep, thats right, you can take the mini off road and it will do fine in most places.


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:22 PM
Post #27 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You obviously do not live in Phoenix, AZ. SUVs and stupidly huge trucks everywhere.

true, I don't. but neither do you live here, where, even though i can go outside a see a plethora of SUVs and trucks of all sizes all over the proverbial "everywhere" by no means are they the only vehicle tyope on the road, or even the majority...unless you're at a horse show, or construction site.

I'd wager that they arent the only vehicles on the road down your way as well.

In reply to:
As for quality, I'll give it to you from the mouth of a GM prototype machinist that took early retirement (in a cost cutting measure) a couple years back. He said that the "cost engineers" are running the show now. The bottom line is not how good the car is but the profit margin.

...and, how is this NOT the case with every fricken car company on the planet? unless I'm mistaken, they're all producing cars with the idea of making money at it, and their collective bottom lines are all about the cha-ching at the end of the day.

In reply to:
GM has cut WAY back on testing (they now run the car 5000 miles and model the rest) and consequently, our GM work trucks are falling apart under us before 100,000 miles. On one we have had to weld the bed 5 times. Brakes, suspension, electrics...we've had trouble with everything.
But hey, nice cup holders, though.

the usage environment of trucks used for commercial enterprises is especially tough, so it's no surprise really, but, can you compare with how other trucks would hold up? do you have other brands in your work fleet? exactly what the hell were you carrying that damaged the bed so badly it needed to be re-welded 5 times?

I'd wager it'd be easy for me to find others who've owned GM pickups that haven't had you're problems.

It has been my observation that it's equally easy to find people who will praise a car, as it is to find people who will bash the very same vehicle, and that those personal opinions depend largely on the personal experience of the person doing the bashing. it has also been my experience that it's popular to bash american cars, whether or not it's deserved


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:30 PM
Post #28 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
the last outback i owned got 32 mpg highway and 28 in town. pretty similar to a mini. you could also nearly put a mini inside of it, and i could drive up 4WD roads in the subaru. you got me on the safety part though.

if they want to market the mini as a quirky image oriented sports car that corners on rails, fine. to market it as a fuel efficient vehicle based on the size is nonsense however, and that is my problem with it.

sorry just got to point this out.
The Mini Cooper and Cooper "S" were sportier versions that were successful as rally cars, winning the Monte Carlo Rally three times.
yep, thats right, you can take the mini off road and it will do fine in most places.

To Clarify:

Gritstoner is talking about the orignal 1960s BMC (Alec Issingonis-designed) Mini, as modified by brit John Cooper's race car and performance tuner company, NOT the current BMW-built car.


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #29 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
your escort was and is regarded quite highly as cars go.

really? then you've never read the plethora of negative comments that have surrounded it since it's introduction in 1982. I had a 1984 Esacoprt GT. it was such an unreliable shitbox that one day, after 95,000 miles of agony, I got out my gas torch, fired it up, and then cut the car up into pieces in my driveway and had it hauled away, so that no other por soul would ever be able to drive it. (true story)

In reply to:
A buddy has the same thing - his escort (had it's suspension given a once over and replaced this and that) outperforms the focus he got with ease (as long as the clutch doesn't explode).

and, exaactly what abuse was he heaping on it that damaged the clutch? that's not a fault of the car.

In reply to:
I think my point is that if you were to choose an american car these days over a honda, toyota, or even a hyundai, what would you pick? pontiac G6 or an accord or civic???

Chevy HHR. I think they look cool, and they're on the Cobalt platform, which seems fairly robust.
hell, even look at american trucks. Chev....ask chossmonkey how his diff sounds.

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 1:53 PM
Post #30 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 2:09 PM
Post #31 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

was there a recall?

In reply to:

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!

on a rainy day, like today, and bored at work, it's good times going on about cars. ;-)


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 3:23 PM
Post #32 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Comparing the Mini and a Subaru is comparing apples and oranges.

Subaru's are designed and marketed as outdoor adventure machines, family oriented AWD fun etc.

The Mini is a performance oriented (albeit handling/stopping power more than break neck speed) urban/communter vehicle.

You can't tell me that the Mini's image marketign is any more prevalent than that of Subaru's. This site is a perfect example of that. Try bad mouthing Subaru's or toyota trucks in this community and you'll be met with a throng of violent objections.

The benefit of the Mini (and even the Smart car) is that they are enjoyable to drive but at the same time they are more socially/environmentally concious choices than an SUV or truck for everyday use. have you ever tried to park a full sized vehicle in an urban core area? Considering that most of us do 95% of our driving on perfectly acceptable roads in decent weather, there is no reason for us to have a big vehicle. Why justify the extra expenses by saying that you need is for offroad driving when you do it once a week for 20 minutes?

There are definately uses for trucks and SUVs, but the (sub)urban road warrior doesn't fit that profile at all. If North Americans moved to smaller vehicles for our day-to-day uses we'd save gas, reduce emissions, reduce traffic congestion, free up extra parking instead of paving new lots, and reduce damages/injuries when impact accidents happen.


traddad


Nov 2, 2006, 4:36 PM
Post #33 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Comparing the Mini and a Subaru is comparing apples and oranges.

Subaru's are designed and marketed as outdoor adventure machines, family oriented AWD fun etc.

The Mini is a performance oriented (albeit handling/stopping power more than break neck speed) urban/communter vehicle.

You can't tell me that the Mini's image marketign is any more prevalent than that of Subaru's. This site is a perfect example of that. Try bad mouthing Subaru's or toyota trucks in this community and you'll be met with a throng of violent objections.

The benefit of the Mini (and even the Smart car) is that they are enjoyable to drive but at the same time they are more socially/environmentally concious choices than an SUV or truck for everyday use. have you ever tried to park a full sized vehicle in an urban core area? Considering that most of us do 95% of our driving on perfectly acceptable roads in decent weather, there is no reason for us to have a big vehicle. Why justify the extra expenses by saying that you need is for offroad driving when you do it once a week for 20 minutes?

There are definately uses for trucks and SUVs, but the (sub)urban road warrior doesn't fit that profile at all. If North Americans moved to smaller vehicles for our day-to-day uses we'd save gas, reduce emissions, reduce traffic congestion, free up extra parking instead of paving new lots, and reduce damages/injuries when impact accidents happen.

OK I'm sold. Where can I get one cheap? Oh wait....MINIs have one of the best resale values of any car on the road. Did either of us mention that MINIs are actually BMWs?


atg200


Nov 2, 2006, 4:51 PM
Post #34 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

well, i think you are missing my point. the mini is a dumb vehicle for an urban commuter because it doesn't save a whole lot of gas. a standard honda civic get considerably better gas mileage than a mini for a lot less money, and a hybrid like a prius gets nearly double the gas mileage as well as other emissions benefits for roughly the same amount as a mini.

my point is that much like a hummer, the mini offers absolutely no practical advantages in its niche. it confers status and some luxury benefits absolutely no one really needs at a significant environmental cost. if everyone switched from a mini to a standard civic, it would be the same gas use benefit as switching from a hummer to a 4runner. if everyone switched from a mini to a prius, it would be the same gas benefit as switching from a hummer to a mini. at least in the salt lake area, there are billboards along I-15 touting the mini's gas efficiency, and that drives me crazy because the mini is simply not a fuel efficient vehicle - it is a status conferring high performance sports car.

that said, i don't think a mini is nearly as bad as a hummer because they theoretically aren't as dangerous to other drivers. i say theoretically because i rarely see hummers driven down the interstate at 100 mph, but i get passed by mini's like i am standing still on a regular basis.


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 6:52 PM
Post #35 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

You are absolutely right, standard sedan type cars (Corrolla, Civic, Golf/Rabbit etc.) get much better milage and are a better choice overall, however small "performance cars" are a move in the right direction. They are smaller than most of the cars listed, which to me is a great boon to street parking, better on gas than most (not all) larger cars, and are still fun to drive. That's a great motivator in our self-centered society, it's FUN, it's cool, it performs. The thing with Smart cars and Minis is that they still give you that ego stroke. you are driving a BMW or Merc. after all.

Ideally we should all be on solar powered mass transit or living within walking distance of work, but it's not going to happen anytime soon (especially for soemone like me who communte to a rural community for work). hell, let's telecommute! :P


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 7:28 PM
Post #36 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
my point is that much like a hummer, the mini offers absolutely no practical advantages in its niche. sis.

see, from this and previous statements, I would posit that you're not at all a car enthusuiast, and therein lies your inability to understand the mini's role int eh automotive world.

dude, the BMW Mini is a SPORTS CAR. it's practical advantages all hinge around it's performance abilities in speed, handling and braking, and it's niche is 2+2 Sports Coupes. It's a car for enthusiasts, as opposed to a car for folks who share your outlook that cars are mostly appliances. the Mini is a much more "immediate" vehicle than a Prius.

Driven with a light foot, the mini will get excellent mileage, well into the mid 30s Mpg. stomped on, it'll drink it right down, as any vehicle does.

Had I the coin, and the choice, I'd buy the Mini over the Prius, renew my SCCA membership, and take it autcrossing, and use it for the occasional track day. it'd be a BLAST. ;-)


krillen


Nov 2, 2006, 7:41 PM
Post #37 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Yep, "fuel economy" is merely an attempted advertising ploy. Their "niche" in the market is exactly as stated above.


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 7:52 PM
Post #38 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:

that's exactly ONE truck, out of a fleet oftens, if not Hundreds, of thousands of vehicles. how well has he kept up the lubricant in the differential housing?

this past summer, both 4th and 5th gear failed in my escort's transmission due to low fluid level. TOTALLY my fault, not that of the car.

you cannot blame the vehicle for failures due to owner abuse or neglect.

very true, but his did it within the first year, and so did literally thousands of other chev trucks. This wasn't operator failure on this one.

was there a recall?

In reply to:

I know other trucks have had a lot of trouble but i don't remember specifics.

anyway. IT's been a good debate and thanks for all the conversation!

on a rainy day, like today, and bored at work, it's good times going on about cars. ;-)

i think you could take the truck in and get it fixed free if yours started grinding.


and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 8:01 PM
Post #39 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

Driven with a light foot, the mini will get excellent mileage, well into the mid 30s Mpg. stomped on, it'll drink it right down, as any vehicle does.

exactly.

as a note (saw this also on top gear), the smart car was not the first car in europe to get awards for environmental friendliness......the new merc S class was!! :D kinda strange but apparently it's incredibly efficient (not so much as in fuel mileage but emissions, which seems counter intuitive...).


robbovius


Nov 2, 2006, 8:14 PM
Post #40 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)


Partner brent_e


Nov 2, 2006, 8:22 PM
Post #41 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)

so you had a z28? What did you do to it?? I thought those things were boats?!

:D

did it have a 350 in it?


traddad


Nov 2, 2006, 10:57 PM
Post #42 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Had I the coin, and the choice, I'd buy the Mini over the Prius, renew my SCCA membership, and take it autcrossing, and use it for the occasional track day. it'd be a BLAST. ;-)

Amen, Brotha.


chossmonkey


Nov 2, 2006, 11:05 PM
Post #43 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!
Anything to keep from talking about climbing huh? :lol:


Partner brent_e


Nov 3, 2006, 2:37 AM
Post #44 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!
Anything to keep from talking about climbing huh? :lol:

eat it, chossman

:D


krillen


Nov 3, 2006, 1:58 PM
Post #45 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2001
Posts: 4769

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

this is community! There's no climbing talk in community! :mrgreen:


chossmonkey


Nov 3, 2006, 2:58 PM
Post #46 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
this is community! There's no climbing talk in community! :mrgreen:

You obviously have never been in the "brent_e" thread.

Oh, sorry.

We do only talk about Brent's non-climbing life there. :lol:


robbovius


Nov 3, 2006, 7:16 PM
Post #47 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
[
and it's ALWAYS good to talk about cars!!!!!


:D


for realz ;-)

so you had a z28? What did you do to it?? I thought those things were boats?!

:D

did it have a 350 in it?

It was a 1987 with the 4bbl 305. not as much hp as the TPI engine, but enough to have plenty of fun. It had the four-speed auto.

since I was autocrossing, I concentrated on the suspension and transmission, and wound up getting a couple neat freebies.
A guy i worked with had been on an SCCA race team in the American Sedan class (which was for pony cars) and had a set of pontiac firebuirg GTA BBS-mesh-style 16x9 rims, which he gave to me. they were different colors two black, one white, and one silver, but I didn't care, they were free!

the car itself had come with the highest level suspension - stiffest factory springs and antiroll bars - and I added a set of Bilstien street/track dampersm whcih REALLY tightened the car up. I swapped out the non-posi read drum brake axle for a posi disc brake unit with 3.23s, and that, ,with the fatter tires really made for some sharp braking. I installed wilwwod proportioning valve and got the brakes to lock up equally all the way around (unlike stock settings where the fronts lock first)

I put a shift kit in the tranny, and fabricated my own shift lever, and drove it with both feet (left foot braking), like a kart.
I replaced the drivers seat with an uphpolstered fiberglass competition bucket and tossed the intertia-reel seatbelt for an aftermarket old-school fully adjstable three point belt.

it was a very tight car, and I had a great time driving it. true, it was a bit of a buckboard, and that solid rear axle wasn't too happy over rough pavement, but man! it s was good times.

I didn't place to highly autocrossing becasue all the guys in my class had newer cars with TPI 350s (meaning, another 60-80 hp than me) and mostly MORE MONEY, and so were able to have a set of street legal autocrossing slicks, whereas I was using goodyear street GTs. still I had a great time. couple times I placed ahead of guys with better cars, ,just by driving more smoothly.

at one of hte events, I knew I wasn;t going to finish int eh money and there was this one turn that was choice for a major powerslide out of it, soooooo, I'd just mash the gas coing out and get all sideways raoring up to the finish ;-) I have some digital video of it somewhere. I'll try to find it.

that odl camaro was every bit as much fun adn rewarding to drive as my mom's 1986 porsche 944, though the 944 was alot more refined in it's dynamics. the Camaro was a big old hot rod that you had to man-handle kinda, but if you gave it positive inputs, it'd do exactly what you wanted.


shakylegs


Nov 3, 2006, 9:08 PM
Post #48 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

*Raises hand*
Um, we have a Mini. If that isn't an urban car, i don't know what is. They're less expensive than the Prius, unless you go for the Cooper S, which is a rocket on wheels.
We get about 35-40 mpg (my Toyota Echo/Yaris gets about 45-50). Solid as hell, can't get pass 100 mph with no vibration, and is really comfortable. The only thing that sucks is that it takes premium gas.


Partner brent_e


Nov 3, 2006, 10:19 PM
Post #49 of 49 (2472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: clarkson and top gear [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

It was a 1987 with the 4bbl 305. not as much hp as the TPI engine, but enough to have plenty of fun. It had the four-speed auto.

tuned port injection, i'm assuming. How much HP did you actually have???

In reply to:
since I was autocrossing, I concentrated on the suspension and transmission, and wound up getting a couple neat freebies.
A guy i worked with had been on an SCCA race team in the American Sedan class (which was for pony cars) and had a set of pontiac firebuirg GTA BBS-mesh-style 16x9 rims, which he gave to me. they were different colors two black, one white, and one silver, but I didn't care, they were free!

obviously suspension, yes. FREE RIMS!!! awesome. There are some university raceteams in the states that are designing and building their own Carbon rims (for small scale formula cars)....they are disgustingly nice and light.


In reply to:
the car itself had come with the highest level suspension - stiffest factory springs and antiroll bars - and I added a set of Bilstien street/track dampersm whcih REALLY tightened the car up. I swapped out the non-posi read drum brake axle for a posi disc brake unit with 3.23s, and that, ,with the fatter tires really made for some sharp braking. I installed wilwwod proportioning valve and got the brakes to lock up equally all the way around (unlike stock settings where the fronts lock first)

wilwood makes some nice stuff. We use them on our car, too! braking is a good thing!

In reply to:
I put a shift kit in the tranny, and fabricated my own shift lever, and drove it with both feet (left foot braking), like a kart.
I replaced the drivers seat with an uphpolstered fiberglass competition bucket and tossed the intertia-reel seatbelt for an aftermarket old-school fully adjstable three point belt.

what i'd like you to explain to me is why you had an auto over a manual?

In reply to:
I didn't place to highly autocrossing becasue all the guys in my class had newer cars with TPI 350s (meaning, another 60-80 hp than me) and mostly MORE MONEY, and so were able to have a set of street legal autocrossing slicks, whereas I was using goodyear street GTs. still I had a great time. couple times I placed ahead of guys with better cars, ,just by driving more smoothly.

money makes such a big difference, doesn't it? When my dad was racing he was poor as hell and beat the big boys - great feeling.

In reply to:
at one of hte events, I knew I wasn;t going to finish int eh money and there was this one turn that was choice for a major powerslide out of it, soooooo, I'd just mash the gas coing out and get all sideways raoring up to the finish ;-) I have some digital video of it somewhere. I'll try to find it.

if you find it i would like to see that! Slowest way around a corner, though!! :lol:

In reply to:
that odl camaro was every bit as much fun adn rewarding to drive as my mom's 1986 porsche 944, though the 944 was alot more refined in it's dynamics. the Camaro was a big old hot rod that you had to man-handle kinda, but if you gave it positive inputs, it'd do exactly what you wanted.

"positive imputs" :lol:

as in, saw on the wheel like mad???

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook