Forums: Climbing Information: Technique & Training:
What do you call this belay style??
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Technique & Training

Premier Sponsor:

 


dallas27


Aug 14, 2007, 6:28 PM
Post #1 of 61 (4320 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

What do you call this belay style??
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

go the petzl.com and click on the reverso product under descenders. Watch the video via the link in the lower left. Skip to about 1/8 to 1/4 in the video where a guy is belaying a girl in what seems to be the 2001 space oddyssey station.

This link _should_ take you their.
http://en.petzl.com/petzl/SportProduits?Produit=204

He uses the brake hand plam down, and feeds & slips, using the guide hand to manage the friction.

What's it called?

thanks in advance


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 6:30 PM
Post #2 of 61 (4316 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
This link _should_ take you their.
http://en.petzl.com/petzl/SportProduits?Produit=204

He uses the brake hand plam down, and feeds & slips, using the guide hand to manage the friction.

What's it called?

Slow.

Jay


Valarc


Aug 14, 2007, 6:33 PM
Post #3 of 61 (4303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh boy, here we go...

I'm posting in this one just so it's easy to find later and follow all the hilarity that is about to ensue...


thomasribiere


Aug 14, 2007, 6:39 PM
Post #4 of 61 (4279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
go the petzl.com and click on the reverso product under descenders. Watch the video via the link in the lower left. Skip to about 1/8 to 1/4 in the video where a guy is belaying a girl in what seems to be the 2001 space oddyssey station.

This link _should_ take you their.
http://en.petzl.com/...Produits?Produit=204

He uses the brake hand plam down, and feeds & slips, using the guide hand to manage the friction.

What's it called?

thanks in advance

ultra- cautious? or how-you-should-belay?


JAB


Aug 14, 2007, 6:43 PM
Post #5 of 61 (4264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 373

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Let me repost the screenshot from the other thread:




dallas27


Aug 14, 2007, 6:58 PM
Post #6 of 61 (4225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [JAB] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

what's up with the comments? I just wanted to know if that "style" had a particular name or not. I'm asking honestly, and have searched the forums for a couple days before asking the question in order not to repost old questions, to the best of my ability at least.


Valarc


Aug 14, 2007, 7:03 PM
Post #7 of 61 (4213 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
what's up with the comments? I just wanted to know if that "style" had a particular name or not. I'm asking honestly, and have searched the forums for a couple days before asking the question in order not to repost old questions, to the best of my ability at least.

This IS an old question, and one that has started massive flame wars on this site. That's why there are so many comments. Look for threads discussing "palm up" versus "palm down" belay styles, and you will see what I mean.

I tried to start a thread to discuss various belay styles in the past, and by already realizing that the topic starts massive flames, I actually ended up making the flames even worse when I tried to keep the thread from going down that road. A lesson learned in RC.com 'etiquette'.


swaghole


Aug 14, 2007, 7:03 PM
Post #8 of 61 (4209 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 20, 2006
Posts: 371

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.


dallas27


Aug 14, 2007, 7:08 PM
Post #9 of 61 (4195 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [Valarc] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Valarc wrote:

This IS an old question, and one that has started massive flame wars on this site. That's why there are so many comments. Look for threads discussing "palm up" versus "palm down" belay styles, and you will see what I mean.

I tried to start a thread to discuss various belay styles in the past, and by already realizing that the topic starts massive flames, I actually ended up making the flames even worse when I tried to keep the thread from going down that road. A lesson learned in RC.com 'etiquette'.

First, thank your for responding. I did check old threads, and I am aware. I kinda felt those flame wars were about which was better than the other, which I didn't think my question gets into.

I'm inferring from your post that it's called the "palms down" method. I thought the palm's down method involved releasing the guide hand, backing up the brake hand, sliding it up, and then returning the guide hand. Or are they both considered the "plam's down" method, just with a variation?


(This post was edited by dallas27 on Aug 14, 2007, 7:20 PM)


fraggle76


Aug 14, 2007, 7:11 PM
Post #10 of 61 (4185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 31

Re: [swaghole] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

LMAO same here Laugh


thomasribiere


Aug 14, 2007, 7:22 PM
Post #11 of 61 (4164 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think that most french people belay palm down. Could we call it French Style?


Partner j_ung


Aug 14, 2007, 7:45 PM
Post #12 of 61 (4128 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [thomasribiere] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thomasribiere wrote:
I think that most french people belay palm down. Could we call it French Style?

Only if we want it to automatically and instantly become obnoxious, dangerous, unethical and poor of style.

NOTE: TongueTongueTongueTongueTongueTongueTongueTongueTongue


Valarc


Aug 14, 2007, 7:52 PM
Post #13 of 61 (4100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
I kinda felt those flame wars were about which was better than the other, which I didn't think my question gets into.

Someone recently said that there are only five actual threads on RC.com - no matter what the topic, all will eventually degrade into one of these discussions. Pretty accurate description in my eyes.

In reply to:
I'm inferring from your post that it's called the "palms down" method.

It's one of several palms down methods, all of which Jay will tell you are responsible for the eating of babies, destruction of the ozone layer, and us losing the war. I've never heard a specific name given for the technique shown in the video, but I tried it out in the name of being well-rounded and found it felt pretty sketchy.


dallas27


Aug 14, 2007, 7:59 PM
Post #14 of 61 (4081 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [Valarc] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sketchy slow? or sketchy unsafe?

I like it for top roping and gym climbing, and will use it for a leader who has a slow climbing style. For faster climbers, the pinch (I use a pinky guide) is the only thing fast enough for me with my short arms.

But i digress, the question was it's name, and it would seem it technically doesn't have a formal name. Maybe french, maybe hands' down.


reg


Aug 14, 2007, 8:01 PM
Post #15 of 61 (4076 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

it's japanese - it's called the "friendly friction happy hands plams down" method. it works!


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 8:08 PM
Post #16 of 61 (4055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [swaghole] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 8:18 PM
Post #17 of 61 (4031 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 8:23 PM
Post #18 of 61 (4015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 8:26 PM
Post #19 of 61 (4004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

And in a sketchy bail situation I would of course adjust my style to be as gentle as possible on the anchor.


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 8:32 PM
Post #20 of 61 (3980 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.

Believe it or not, you have more control by letting the rope slide through your hands than you do by shuffling. Either way, you can stop the climber instantaneously, but by letting the rope slide through, you don't jerk the climber at all (not a little, not a modified amount, but not at all), and you can vary the speed to suit the situation.

Jay


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 8:38 PM
Post #21 of 61 (3962 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.

Believe it or not, you have more control by letting the rope slide through your hands than you do by shuffling. Either way, you can stop the climber instantaneously, but by letting the rope slide through, you don't jerk the climber at all (not a little, not a modified amount, but not at all), and you can vary the speed to suit the situation.

Jay

I taught the same method I use to my brother and I don't feel any jerking at all as the climber.

What methods have you used to determine which gives you more control? Not trying to give you a hard time, I'm curious.


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 8:45 PM
Post #22 of 61 (3947 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.

Believe it or not, you have more control by letting the rope slide through your hands than you do by shuffling. Either way, you can stop the climber instantaneously, but by letting the rope slide through, you don't jerk the climber at all (not a little, not a modified amount, but not at all), and you can vary the speed to suit the situation.

Jay

I taught the same method I use to my brother and I don't feel any jerking at all as the climber.

What methods have you used to determine which gives you more control? Not trying to give you a hard time, I'm curious.

I've probably used every method of belaying and lowering ever devised, other than the foot belay. However, I can prove that you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through the device than by shuffling you hands in two steps:

1. You can stop your partner instantly whether you let rope slide through your hands or shuffle them.

2. You can lower you partner as fast or as slow as you want if you let rope slide through your hands, but when shuffling your hands, your lowering speed is limited by the speed at which you can shuffle your hands back and forth.

Therefore, you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through your hands.

Jay


Partner cracklover


Aug 14, 2007, 8:46 PM
Post #23 of 61 (3944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There is nothing whatsoever wrong with the way the belayer is feeding out slack to the leader, and this method is common to all non-auto-locking devices. This is simply the palm-down version. The palm-up version looks identical, but with the brake hand oriented (surprise, surprise) the other way.

What's a bit unusual, though, is the way slack is taken in. Still, this method is pretty common when "adjusting", or taking in very small amounts of slack. Frankly, it doesn't even work for taking in larger amounts of slack, since it's dependent on the rope either being very stiff, or there being so little rope between the brake hand and the device that the rope won't buckle when you slide the brake hand back up it.

In short, there's no specific name for it, but you could simply say: palm down lead belaying, where fine adjustments are done without any pinch on the brake strand. I think that would be pretty clear.

GO


markc


Aug 14, 2007, 8:54 PM
Post #24 of 61 (3927 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For shits and giggles, I'd call that the palm-down default-lockoff method. While most proponents of the system seem to advocate changing brake hands and always having a grip on the brake strand, this guy just lets the line go slack and feed through his hand. His grip is probably looser at times than mine is with the palm-up pinch-and-slide method.

It seems a bit silly to ask for specific names for the different belay techniques, like different styles of kung fu. However you choose to do so, I'd like to be belayed with the don't-short-rope-and-definitely-never-drop-me method.


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 8:58 PM
Post #25 of 61 (3915 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.

Believe it or not, you have more control by letting the rope slide through your hands than you do by shuffling. Either way, you can stop the climber instantaneously, but by letting the rope slide through, you don't jerk the climber at all (not a little, not a modified amount, but not at all), and you can vary the speed to suit the situation.

Jay

I taught the same method I use to my brother and I don't feel any jerking at all as the climber.

What methods have you used to determine which gives you more control? Not trying to give you a hard time, I'm curious.

I've probably used every method of belaying and lowering ever devised, other than the foot belay. However, I can prove that you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through the device than by shuffling you hands in two steps:

1. You can stop your partner instantly whether you let rope slide through your hands or shuffle them.

2. You can lower you partner as fast or as slow as you want if you let rope slide through your hands, but when shuffling your hands, your lowering speed is limited by the speed at which you can shuffle your hands back and forth.

Therefore, you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through your hands.

Jay

I see. It's a semantic difference then. My definition of control didn't include speed, just the ability to lock off and safely lower the climber. Lowering faster than I can shuffle is not something I was interested in doing.


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 9:02 PM
Post #26 of 61 (3257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
swaghole wrote:
that chick IS hot. I didn't notice anything else.

Heh.

I noticed the guy uses hand over hand for lowering. Personally I think this is not ideal. I just keep both hands on the rope and shuffle the rope through.

Try keeping both hands on the brake side of the rope, and just letting the rope slide through your hands without shuffling. Your partner will appreciate the smoother ride, and you'll be putting less stress on the anchor, a possible consideration in, say, a bail situation.

Jay

To further elaborate on my style. I don't do a jerky shuffle. It's a modified sliding shuffle. I would rather not let the rope just slide through, I would rather go a little slower and have more control, and more time to see if there are any kinks headed my way.

Believe it or not, you have more control by letting the rope slide through your hands than you do by shuffling. Either way, you can stop the climber instantaneously, but by letting the rope slide through, you don't jerk the climber at all (not a little, not a modified amount, but not at all), and you can vary the speed to suit the situation.

Jay

I taught the same method I use to my brother and I don't feel any jerking at all as the climber.

What methods have you used to determine which gives you more control? Not trying to give you a hard time, I'm curious.

I've probably used every method of belaying and lowering ever devised, other than the foot belay. However, I can prove that you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through the device than by shuffling you hands in two steps:

1. You can stop your partner instantly whether you let rope slide through your hands or shuffle them.

2. You can lower you partner as fast or as slow as you want if you let rope slide through your hands, but when shuffling your hands, your lowering speed is limited by the speed at which you can shuffle your hands back and forth.

Therefore, you have more control over lowering when you let rope slide through your hands.

Jay

I see. It's a semantic difference then. My definition of control didn't include speed, just the ability to lock off and safely lower the climber.

Well, that ability is equal either way.

In reply to:
Lowering faster than I can shuffle is not something I was interested in doing.

You should be interested in lowering both faster and more smoothly than you can by shuffling your hands. In general, your partners will appreciated not having to spend so much time sitting in their harness, and getting (even a "modified") jerky lower. And in an emergency, the ability to lower fast (and smooth) can be crucial.

Jay


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 9:03 PM
Post #27 of 61 (3256 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So I would say that the level of control is the same (ignoring speed) with shuffling versus sliding. My main point was against the hand over hand method, the more hands on the brake side the better.


kobaz


Aug 14, 2007, 9:06 PM
Post #28 of 61 (3252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
You should be interested in lowering both faster and more smoothly than you can by shuffling your hands. In general, your partners will appreciated not having to spend so much time sitting in their harness, and getting (even a "modified") jerky lower. And in an emergency, the ability to lower fast (and smooth) can be crucial.
Jay

I am fully capable of speedily and safely lowering a climber with a sliding or shuffling method in a situation that requires it. My partners definitely don't spend any more time in their harness than the average climber elsewhere being lowered by any other method (ignoring the elevator rides from a grigri). And still, I beg to differ about the "jerkiness".


jt512


Aug 14, 2007, 9:11 PM
Post #29 of 61 (3244 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
You should be interested in lowering both faster and more smoothly than you can by shuffling your hands. In general, your partners will appreciated not having to spend so much time sitting in their harness, and getting (even a "modified") jerky lower. And in an emergency, the ability to lower fast (and smooth) can be crucial.
Jay

I am fully capable of speedily and safely lowering a climber with a sliding or shuffling method in a situation that requires it.

No, actually, you're not, unless you have bionic arms, or something. When a local climber dropped a large rock onto his 2-year-old daughter's head from 80 feet up a few years ago, it is good that it wasn't you who was belaying him.

Edit: I have had to retrain every single belayer I've ever had who lowered me hand-over-hand because they lowered me unnecessarily slowly and jerky. I suppose it is possible that you might faster and smoother, but it's unlikely.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 14, 2007, 9:13 PM)


time2clmb


Aug 14, 2007, 9:29 PM
Post #30 of 61 (3225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 473

Re: [thomasribiere] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thomasribiere wrote:
I think that most french people belay palm down. Could we call it French Style?

Techniquely speaking, you are pulling on gear so I suppose "French Style" would be an appropriate name. har har har Laugh Tongue


time2clmb


Aug 14, 2007, 9:31 PM
Post #31 of 61 (3220 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 26, 2007
Posts: 473

Re: [reg] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reg wrote:
it's japanese - it's called the "friendly friction happy hands plams down" method. it works!

ahhh yes...gives me good laugh happy time. That post gets a trophy.


kobaz


Aug 15, 2007, 1:51 AM
Post #32 of 61 (3180 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
You should be interested in lowering both faster and more smoothly than you can by shuffling your hands. In general, your partners will appreciated not having to spend so much time sitting in their harness, and getting (even a "modified") jerky lower. And in an emergency, the ability to lower fast (and smooth) can be crucial.
Jay

I am fully capable of speedily and safely lowering a climber with a sliding or shuffling method in a situation that requires it.

No, actually, you're not, unless you have bionic arms, or something.

Jay

Completely uncalled for. Who are you to judge me and my belaying capabilities based on a short discussion about style on a web forum.

I will note that I do not use the hand over hand method.

jt512 wrote:
When a local climber dropped a large rock onto his 2-year-old daughter's head from 80 feet up a few years ago, it is good that it wasn't you who was belaying him.

Why this has anything to do with belaying style is beyond me.

Edit: I don't usually edit, but I had to fix some grammar.


(This post was edited by kobaz on Aug 15, 2007, 1:55 AM)


kobaz


Aug 15, 2007, 1:53 AM
Post #33 of 61 (3179 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, I know who you are in terms of rc.com. And I have in the past ran into threads where you have been proven wrong. This is no exception.


jt512


Aug 15, 2007, 2:08 AM
Post #34 of 61 (3173 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
You should be interested in lowering both faster and more smoothly than you can by shuffling your hands. In general, your partners will appreciated not having to spend so much time sitting in their harness, and getting (even a "modified") jerky lower. And in an emergency, the ability to lower fast (and smooth) can be crucial.
Jay

I am fully capable of speedily and safely lowering a climber with a sliding or shuffling method in a situation that requires it.

No, actually, you're not, unless you have bionic arms, or something.

Jay

Completely uncalled for. Who are you to judge me and my belaying capabilities based on a short discussion about style on a web forum.

I don't have to know you to know that you can't lower someone as fast by shuffling your hands as you could by letting the rope slide through them, because no one could.

In reply to:
jt512 wrote:
When a local climber dropped a large rock onto his 2-year-old daughter's head from 80 feet up a few years ago, it is good that it wasn't you who was belaying him.

Why this has anything to do with belaying style is beyond me.

What is so hard to understand? You claimed that you can lower as fast as necessary in any situation by lowering hand over hand, a method that is clearly slower than letting rope through your hands. I gave an example of an actual accident where lowering with the maximum possible safe speed was essential. A belayer lowering the injured kid's dad by letting rope slide through the device could get him down the necessary 80 feet in a few seconds. Shuffling your hands back and forth like a gym-trained n00b would take many times longer, an unacceptable delay in a possible life-or-death situation.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 15, 2007, 2:11 AM)


kobaz


Aug 15, 2007, 2:21 AM
Post #35 of 61 (3155 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
What is so hard to understand? You claimed that you can lower as fast as necessary in any situation by lowering hand over hand, a method that is clearly slower than letting rope through your hands. I gave an example of an actual accident where lowering with the maximum possible safe speed was essential. A belayer lowering the injured kid's dad by letting rope slide through the device could get him down the necessary 80 feet in a few seconds. Shuffling your hands back and forth like a gym-trained n00b would take many times longer, an unacceptable delay in a possible life-or-death situation.

Jay

You left out some context and assumed I would know exactly what was going on. If there were other people around to handle the injured kid than the belay style would have been moot. Who brings a two year old to a cliff anyway... but that's besides the point.

Ready for this one? This is the third time. I repeat. I do not use the hand over hand method. The whole point of my first post was advocating against the hand over hand method. But if you want to continue your straw man argument, be my guest.

Apparently you didn't notice, but I also said I am fully capable of using the sliding method to quickly lower a climber if the situation requires it. If someone was in need of getting down quickly, I can do just that. Although I do prefer to not let the rope slide in normal lowering situations.


jt512


Aug 15, 2007, 2:36 AM
Post #36 of 61 (3142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
What is so hard to understand? You claimed that you can lower as fast as necessary in any situation by lowering hand over hand, a method that is clearly slower than letting rope through your hands. I gave an example of an actual accident where lowering with the maximum possible safe speed was essential. A belayer lowering the injured kid's dad by letting rope slide through the device could get him down the necessary 80 feet in a few seconds. Shuffling your hands back and forth like a gym-trained n00b would take many times longer, an unacceptable delay in a possible life-or-death situation.

Jay

You left out some context and assumed I would know exactly what was going on.

No, the context was quite clear. Go back and read the post.

In reply to:
If there were other people around to handle the injured kid than the belay style would have been moot.

I can assure you that if it was your child bleeding from a head wound of unknown seriousness, you would not think the speed at which your belayer could get you down would be moot.

In reply to:
Ready for this one? This is the third time. I repeat. I do not use the hand over hand method.

I know you don't. You shuffle your hands back and forth. Duh.

In reply to:
But if you want to continue your straw man argument, be my guest.

I'm not making a strawman argument. I'm telling you that shuffling your hands back and forth to lower someone is unnecessary for safety, and is slow and jerky, with no compensating benefit. Instead of saying, "ok, I'll try the other way next time out and see if you're right," you just throw up a stone wall, and insist that shuffling is fast and smooth "enough."

In reply to:
Apparently you didn't notice, but I also said I am fully capable of using the sliding method to quickly lower a climber if the situation requires it.

You're right. I did miss that in your earlier post.

Jay


kobaz


Aug 15, 2007, 2:47 AM
Post #37 of 61 (3134 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
In reply to:
Ready for this one? This is the third time. I repeat. I do not use the hand over hand method.

I know you don't. You shuffle your hands back and forth. Duh.

In reply to:
But if you want to continue your straw man argument, be my guest.
I'm not making a strawman argument.

You kept attacking me on the hand over hand method when I was against it as well, so it seemed you were doing pretty good on misrepresenting my angle.

jt512 wrote:
I'm telling you that shuffling your hands back and forth to lower someone is unnecessary for safety, and is slow and jerky, with no compensating benefit. Instead of saying, "ok, I'll try the other way next time out and see if you're right," you just throw up a stone wall, and insist that shuffling is fast and smooth "enough."

The reason I didn't say "okay I'll try it out" is because I'm already familiar with it, and prefer not to use it. My "wall" was about sliding vs my shuffling to be no real difference in "normal" (non-epic, non-accident) climbing situations.

So at least we've made some progress here, heh.

Edit: hmm, I should use preview more often.


(This post was edited by kobaz on Aug 15, 2007, 2:49 AM)


jt512


Aug 15, 2007, 3:01 AM
Post #38 of 61 (3124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
jt512 wrote:
In reply to:
Ready for this one? This is the third time. I repeat. I do not use the hand over hand method.

I know you don't. You shuffle your hands back and forth. Duh.

In reply to:
But if you want to continue your straw man argument, be my guest.
I'm not making a strawman argument.

You kept attacking me on the hand over hand method when I was against it as well...

I don't know where you got that idea. I haven't made a single comment to you about the hand-over-hand method, at least not in this thread.

Jay


kobaz


Aug 15, 2007, 3:03 AM
Post #39 of 61 (3122 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It would be where you said:

jt512 wrote:
What is so hard to understand? You claimed that you can lower as fast as necessary in any situation by lowering hand over hand, a method that is clearly slower than letting rope through your hands.


curt


Aug 15, 2007, 3:40 AM
Post #40 of 61 (3110 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shufflers = sharks

sliders = jets

There's gonna be trouble in the street...

Curt


jt512


Aug 15, 2007, 3:58 AM
Post #41 of 61 (3104 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kobaz] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kobaz wrote:
It would be where you said:

jt512 wrote:
What is so hard to understand? You claimed that you can lower as fast as necessary in any situation by lowering hand over hand, a method that is clearly slower than letting rope through your hands.

My mistake. I meant shuffling.

Jay


fracture


Aug 15, 2007, 4:58 AM
Post #42 of 61 (3084 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2003
Posts: 1814

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
I can assure you that if it was your child bleeding from a head wound of unknown seriousness, you would not think the speed at which your belayer could get you down would be moot.

How'd that turn out, by the way?


jt512


Aug 15, 2007, 5:03 AM
Post #43 of 61 (3081 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [fracture] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

fracture wrote:
jt512 wrote:
I can assure you that if it was your child bleeding from a head wound of unknown seriousness, you would not think the speed at which your belayer could get you down would be moot.

How'd that turn out, by the way?

A deep cut, but not life threatening.

Jay


AZrockclimber1988


Aug 15, 2007, 5:53 AM
Post #44 of 61 (3069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: 86

Re: [thomasribiere] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thomasribiere wrote:
I think that most french people belay palm down. Could we call it French Style?

I belay palm down when lead belaying, which to me is easier and safer. It was the way I was taught. I only use palm up when toprope belaying or second belay.


curt


Aug 15, 2007, 6:02 AM
Post #45 of 61 (3064 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [AZrockclimber1988] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

AZrockclimber1988 wrote:
thomasribiere wrote:
I think that most french people belay palm down. Could we call it French Style?

I belay palm down when lead belaying, which to me is easier and safer. It was the way I was taught. I only use palm up when toprope belaying or second belay.

Palm up versus palm down makes no difference whatsoever. It's all about where your hand is with respect to separating the ropes (assuming an ATC-like device is used) when a fall occurs. If the belayer can efficiently "lock-off" the device, that's all that matters.

Curt


reg


Aug 15, 2007, 11:46 AM
Post #46 of 61 (3038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560

Re: [curt] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:


Palm up versus palm down makes no difference whatsoever. It's all about where your hand is with respect to separating the ropes (assuming an ATC-like device is used) when a fall occurs. If the belayer can efficiently "lock-off" the device, that's all that matters.

Curt

thank gwad - the final word - now just end it!


dallas27


Aug 15, 2007, 1:39 PM
Post #47 of 61 (3014 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [reg] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As the OP (a symbolic power at best) please try to keep it civil everyone.

I know no matter what technique you use, someone is always out there attacking it. Don't be that guy. Nobody likes that guy.


dallas27


Aug 16, 2007, 10:16 PM
Post #48 of 61 (2943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [cracklover] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:

What's a bit unusual, though, is the way slack is taken in. Still, this method is pretty common when "adjusting", or taking in very small amounts of slack. Frankly, it doesn't even work for taking in larger amounts of slack, since it's dependent on the rope either being very stiff, or there being so little rope between the brake hand and the device that the rope won't buckle when you slide the brake hand back up it.

GO

I actually use that "adjustment" method for TR belaying a lot. I have almost a karate kid "wax-on" motion with my brake hand. I loosen my grip just a bit, slip my hand up, snatch the rope nearer the deviceand push my hand out to the side to suck up slack and back down to my hip in the brake position.

It's one fluid circular motion taking in total probably a quarter of a second. I also belay from the harness, not the loop. This method isn't as easy when belaying from the loop because of the play in the carabiner.

My guide hand remains on the guide strand.

I catch a lot of flack for this style from certain types of people. Some say it's unsafe because I don't have a death grip on the rope when it's sliding. I call shenangians, because it's no more or less loose than the palms up method, only I'm in a locked orienation, not unlocked like the palms up method.

added bonus, the motion practically self coils the rope for you.


(This post was edited by dallas27 on Aug 16, 2007, 10:28 PM)


jakedatc


Aug 16, 2007, 11:41 PM
Post #49 of 61 (2926 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I also belay from the harness, not the loop.

If your harness has a belay loop then you should use it. Read the instructions on your harness.


dallas27


Aug 16, 2007, 11:48 PM
Post #50 of 61 (2922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [jakedatc] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
In reply to:
I also belay from the harness, not the loop.

If your harness has a belay loop then you should use it. Read the instructions on your harness.

I'm sure this has been covered in many a thread already, if not, let's start a new thread and keep this one clean.


jakedatc


Aug 16, 2007, 11:51 PM
Post #51 of 61 (1355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's not my fault you're using your gear incorrectly.


dallas27


Aug 17, 2007, 12:04 AM
Post #52 of 61 (1349 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [jakedatc] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
It's not my fault you're using your gear incorrectly.

I have never seen a harness manual with a picture of belay from the harness and a red x through it, which you would see since the belay loop is a recent invention, and everyone belayed this way in a slingshot belay back then.

Now, please take this elsewhere, you obviously want to profuse your knowledge, not discuss.


jt512


Aug 17, 2007, 1:33 AM
Post #53 of 61 (1325 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
It's not my fault you're using your gear incorrectly.

I have never seen a harness manual with a picture of belay from the harness and a red x through it, which you would see since the belay loop is a recent invention, and everyone belayed this way in a slingshot belay back then.

In fact, all new Petzl harnesses come with a bright green belay loop with a diagram right on the loop showing it as the attachment point for the belay device. Furthermore, their website as well as a notice that comes with the harness says this:

"The green belay loop identifies the point where the belay device/descender must be connected. It is the strongest part of the harness."

In reply to:
Now, please take this elsewhere...

Why? Because you need more than 3 pages of responses telling you that there is no specific name for the dysfunctional belay style you asked about?

Jay


curt


Aug 17, 2007, 1:38 AM
Post #54 of 61 (1321 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
It's not my fault you're using your gear incorrectly.

I have never seen a harness manual with a picture of belay from the harness and a red x through it, which you would see since the belay loop is a recent invention, and everyone belayed this way in a slingshot belay back then.

Now, please take this elsewhere, you obviously want to profuse your knowledge, not discuss.

It sounds to me that you are just not interested in hearing that you are using your equipment improperly--which you are, if you are not belaying off the belay loop.

Curt


dallas27


Aug 17, 2007, 1:51 AM
Post #55 of 61 (1312 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 17

Re: [curt] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm following advice of the guy who designed harnesses for years at BD.

"The belay loop is designed for rappelling and belaying only. Use it if you find it convenient."

"Belay loops were invented ... to solve the problem of having no obvious place to clip into a harness for belaying and rappelling. The idea caught on because many people found it convenient."

-TomJones -BD


Personally, I'm pretty sure the loop is so universally recommended by manufacturers as to prevent all the newbies out there from anchoring to the the harness tie in poiints or the loop and not the biner, thus prevent accident from shearing forces on the harness.


(This post was edited by dallas27 on Aug 17, 2007, 1:56 AM)


jakedatc


Aug 17, 2007, 1:54 AM
Post #56 of 61 (1308 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
It's not my fault you're using your gear incorrectly.

I have never seen a harness manual with a picture of belay from the harness and a red x through it, which you would see since the belay loop is a recent invention, and everyone belayed this way in a slingshot belay back then.

Now, please take this elsewhere, you obviously want to profuse your knowledge, not discuss.

It's right in the fucking video you posted.. "Attach reverso to the BELAY loop of your harness"

New invention? hardly. Learn how to use your gear.

On topic.. the way that guy takes up slack looks scary to me.. If the climber fell when he's sliding the brake hand back up towards the belay device it's asking for trouble since with anything less than a static rope you'd have to loosen your grip quite a bit to let it go through.


jt512


Aug 17, 2007, 1:56 AM
Post #57 of 61 (1306 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
"The belay loop is designed for rappelling and belaying only. Use it if you find it convenient."

"Belay loops were invented ... to solve the problem of having no obvious place to clip into a harness for belaying and rappelling. The idea caught on because many people found it convenient."

-TomJones -BD

He said that, like, 10 years ago, and worked for the only company in the industry that still produces a harness without a belay loop. Obviously, other manufacturers disagree with BD about this. And, since you ignored the inconvenient point, I'll reiterate that Petzl states that the belay loop is the only acceptable place on the harness to attach the belay device.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Aug 17, 2007, 1:57 AM)


jakedatc


Aug 17, 2007, 2:03 AM
Post #58 of 61 (1299 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
I'm following advice of the guy who designed harnesses for years at BD.

"The belay loop is designed for rappelling and belaying only. Use it if you find it convenient."

"Belay loops were invented ... to solve the problem of having no obvious place to clip into a harness for belaying and rappelling. The idea caught on because many people found it convenient."

-TomJones -BD

where did you find that?

"When using belay and rappel devices, they should only be attached to the belay loop." - Black diamond Technical notice for harnesses

"Always read the instructions and warnings that accompany your gear."
http://www.bdel.com/gear/momentum.php look under Directions for use

Petzl. Here you go... BIG FREAKING X, NOOB



jt512


Aug 17, 2007, 2:31 AM
Post #59 of 61 (1287 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jakedatc] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
dallas27 wrote:
I'm following advice of the guy who designed harnesses for years at BD.

"The belay loop is designed for rappelling and belaying only. Use it if you find it convenient."

"Belay loops were invented ... to solve the problem of having no obvious place to clip into a harness for belaying and rappelling. The idea caught on because many people found it convenient."

-TomJones -BD

where did you find that?

"When using belay and rappel devices, they should only be attached to the belay loop." - Black diamond Technical notice for harnesses

"Always read the instructions and warnings that accompany your gear."
http://www.bdel.com/gear/momentum.php look under Directions for use

The quote he posted was originally posted to rec.climbing a number of years ago. It appears that even BD has changed its opinion (finally).

Jay


rockguide


Aug 17, 2007, 5:52 AM
Post #60 of 61 (1276 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2004
Posts: 1359

Re: [dallas27] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dallas27 wrote:
go the petzl.com and click on the reverso product under descenders. Watch the video via the link in the lower left. Skip to about 1/8 to 1/4 in the video where a guy is belaying a girl in what seems to be the 2001 space oddyssey station.

This link _should_ take you their.
http://en.petzl.com/petzl/SportProduits?Produit=204

He uses the brake hand plam down, and feeds & slips, using the guide hand to manage the friction.

What's it called?

thanks in advance

I call it ... belaying.


cgailey


Aug 27, 2007, 6:57 AM
Post #61 of 61 (1171 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 585

Re: [jt512] What do you call this belay style?? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I haven't read or posted on this site in a long time, but this is hilarious! Nothing has changed...Laugh


Forums : Climbing Information : Technique & Training

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook