|
caughtinside
May 27, 2010, 8:57 PM
Post #76 of 97
(4561 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
boymeetsrock wrote: caughtinside wrote: boymeetsrock wrote: caughtinside wrote: oh yeah!! Elitist douchery FTW! Isn't it uncouth to claim the PT after is was completed? Lame. Well, you're a donny so I wouldn't expect you to be familiar with the rules guidelines. I'll cut you. Nice try. If you weren't so weke I might be concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
May 27, 2010, 9:02 PM
Post #77 of 97
(4553 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
Missed another one.
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
May 27, 2010, 9:05 PM
Post #78 of 97
(4548 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
Black Canyon, North Chasm View Wall Note sure it counts as a 'crag' though.
|
|
|
|
|
cchas
May 28, 2010, 2:12 AM
Post #79 of 97
(4516 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344
|
Camhead, If you thought Paradise Forks was pretty good, you should check out the Waterfall in Oak Creek Canyon (and if you haven't been there in the last couple of years, especially last year, you haven't been there). Terminator at the Waterfall makes Paradise Forks looks like a choss pile. Hell, after climbing at the cookie Cliff for nearly 10 yrs, I'd say the Waterfall makes the Cookie Cliff in Yosemite look like a second rate cliff. For me 1) Grand Wall/University Wall area in Squamish 2) Reservoir Wall in Indian Creek 3) Cat Wall in Indian Creek 4) Waterfall in Oak Creek Canyon (Arizona) 5) thinking about #5..... the Trapps is pretty good (climbed there for more then a decade) but the 5.10's and 5.11's are so dilute stacked betweenm the 5.0's to 5.9's that I don't qualify it, whereas at Paradise Forks, Indian Creek, Waterfall, to go from one 5.10-5.13 to another you just move your rope 10ft to the right or left for another 5 star routre. And camhead, next time you are in Az drop me a line and I can show you some stuff that makes a lot of the stuff at the Creek look OK.
(This post was edited by cchas on May 28, 2010, 2:14 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
May 28, 2010, 4:03 PM
Post #80 of 97
(4483 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8.
|
|
|
|
|
edge
May 28, 2010, 4:11 PM
Post #81 of 97
(4482 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Well, if we are going to bring grades into this, then I will say that I grew up in NH, and cut my teeth on NH 5.9+'s. This is localese for full on 5.10+. My first trip to the Valley, my first route was the West Face of Rixon's, and thought it was a stroll. Literally, I thought it was a 5.8. Until we went to rap off and the rope got hung up twice...
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
May 28, 2010, 4:12 PM
Post #82 of 97
(4481 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
I was going to suggest the Grand Wall area as well. The first pitch of a lot of the multipitch classics are terrific. I wasn't sure that the density of climbs was up to snuff.
|
|
|
|
|
cchas
May 28, 2010, 5:22 PM
Post #83 of 97
(4460 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344
|
edge wrote: justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Well, if we are going to bring grades into this, then I will say that I grew up in NH, and cut my teeth on NH 5.9+'s. This is localese for full on 5.10+. My first trip to the Valley, my first route was the West Face of Rixon's, and thought it was a stroll. Literally, I thought it was a 5.8. Until we went to rap off and the rope got hung up twice... and I always laugh at posts like this. When I moved from the East I was climbing 5.10's and a few .11's at the Gunks and had just spent 2 yrs doing R/X rated climbs there and climbed extensively on the East Coast. When I moved to San Francisco I spent my first year getting my #ss handed to me on Yosemite and Tuolumne 5.9's.
|
|
|
|
|
edge
May 28, 2010, 5:55 PM
Post #84 of 97
(4449 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
cchas wrote: edge wrote: justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Well, if we are going to bring grades into this, then I will say that I grew up in NH, and cut my teeth on NH 5.9+'s. This is localese for full on 5.10+. My first trip to the Valley, my first route was the West Face of Rixon's, and thought it was a stroll. Literally, I thought it was a 5.8. Until we went to rap off and the rope got hung up twice... and I always laugh at posts like this. When I moved from the East I was climbing 5.10's and a few .11's at the Gunks and had just spent 2 yrs doing R/X rated climbs there and climbed extensively on the East Coast. When I moved to San Francisco I spent my first year getting my #ss handed to me on Yosemite and Tuolumne 5.9's. Fair enough, it seems like a style issue? The Gunks are a totally different beast than anything I know in NH. I got spanked the first time I went to the Trapps, but really they were a great stepping stone. I still stand by my assertion that if you can climb .9+ on Cathedral and have experience on the slabs of Whitehorse, then nothing of the same grade in Yosemite or Tuolumne can compare. Again, my opinion. This was my observation and I respect differences of opinion. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
swoopee
May 28, 2010, 6:39 PM
Post #85 of 97
(4427 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560
|
justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Ouch.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
May 28, 2010, 8:06 PM
Post #86 of 97
(4410 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
swoopee wrote: justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Ouch. Not really. A guy who lives in texas calling west coast 5.8s 5.5s isn't really saying much. I've been to texas and seen their 'climbing.' Not impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
May 28, 2010, 8:17 PM
Post #87 of 97
(4398 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
wallwombat wrote: Arapiles. Ding Ding!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
edge
May 28, 2010, 8:21 PM
Post #88 of 97
(4392 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
kachoong wrote: wallwombat wrote: Arapiles. Ding Ding!!!! Not fair...
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
May 28, 2010, 11:28 PM
Post #89 of 97
(4364 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
caughtinside wrote: swoopee wrote: justroberto wrote: caughtinside wrote: Out west 5.5 doesn't even exist. Sure it does. It's just called 5.8. Ouch. Not really. A guy who lives in texas calling west coast 5.8s 5.5s isn't really saying much. I've been to texas and seen their 'climbing.' Not impressed. Texas isn't my reference point. Austin grading is even softer than the desert, but that's beside the point...
|
|
|
|
|
curt
May 31, 2010, 5:33 AM
Post #91 of 97
(4287 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
cracklover wrote: edge wrote: So, I have climbed a few areas over a few years, but am curious. What do you consider the best single crag for these grades? Please don't answer with an area like "Yosemite," unless you want to be more specific and say "the Cookie." Then you will be wrong, in my opinion, but I would still want to hear from you. For 5.10, I'd have to say the Trapps in the Gunks... I'll second that, unless of course, I'm GU'd. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
May 31, 2010, 6:18 AM
Post #92 of 97
(4278 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
When I read questions like this, I thank my lucky stars that I am not and never have been limited to a single crag or climbing area. Some of my favorite have already been mentioned. I am currently shopping for the perfect house location. A place where I can retire and climb year-round. Chattanooga area looks like it will be the best place. Climbing, cost of living, and friendly people. In no particular order: I lived in TN a few years, the states best climbing is at T-wall, but Whiteside and the North Side of Looking Glass were really good too. (T-wall is to hot in summer) I had a condo near North Conway, Cathedral kept me busy for a couple of summer. I never got bored there, but the winter is cold at best. I live in Yosemite for a year after High school. You can climb year-round but the place closes in on you after a while. I almost bought a house near Paradise Forks a couple years ago. A small climbing area that has excellent single pitch climbing. I think it would get boring to climb there exclusively. I like the Needles, but I would die at a much younger age if I lived there. Run outs are long, and winter is even longer. Colorado has Lumpy Ridge, spectacular climbing with a reasonable winter, but the climbing season for pure rock is still pretty short. I plan on spending most of this summer climbing Lovers' Leap in Tahoe. I'll be house shopping too. I like the leap, a nice mix of routes. But winter is to cold to climb. In short, they is no perfect place to climb exclusively year-round. Guess I am lucky, I climb overseas around Asia, New Zealand, and Australia during the the American Winter and spend summer climbing in the USA or Europe. The variety of areas keeps me from getting bored, sort of like sport and climbing trad climbing keeping me from getting burned out. E
|
|
|
|
|
curt
May 31, 2010, 6:50 AM
Post #93 of 97
(4271 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
bandycoot wrote: edge wrote: bandycoot wrote: edge wrote: Not really a single crag, but thanks for playing. I love it there too. Pick almost any of the faces there and it meets your criteria. Slab/knobs/corners/aretes/cracks/face in the 5.10-5.12 range. I think I just drooled on my keyboard a little..... Fair enough, but do any one of those single faces match up to the variety of previously mentioned areas? Even if they don't, as soon as I see the word "best" in reference to a climbing area I twitch compusively and MUST reply "Needles". Plus they're pretty......... Josh You guys should stop confusing the real Needles with that other place in California. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 31, 2010, 7:15 AM
Post #94 of 97
(4261 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
rangerrob wrote: Seriously though, four crags keep popping up. The Trapps, Lower Index, Black Velvet Canyon, and Cathedral. so it comes down to that. Wow, love those minus LTW which I haven't been, but if it came down to it I'd probably spend my time on Eldorado's Bastille and Redgarden Wall first. P.S. Marco Fedrizzi on 'The Wizard', our Crow Hill FA from the two years in the mid-80s I lived in NH.
(This post was edited by healyje on May 31, 2010, 9:12 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
May 31, 2010, 1:54 PM
Post #95 of 97
(4230 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
edge wrote: chadnsc wrote: I would say Devils Tower, but then again I'm limited by my geographic location. DT is awesome, but little variety. I love the Tower, but it might be more to do with the atmosphere than the actual climbing (though the variety isn't bad, better than places like Indian Creek and maybe other crack climbing meccas). Otherwise I would consider a wall the NRG, which I think really picks up in the 5.10 range. I'm not that familiar with the New though, so I can't narrow it down to one wall.
|
|
|
|
|
kappydane
May 31, 2010, 1:58 PM
Post #96 of 97
(4228 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2004
Posts: 119
|
I consider cragging to be quick access with a lot of routes close together. So I propose Horseshoe Canyon Ranch in Arkansas. Probably the most routes available in the smallest physical area. You can walk from one side of the ranch to the other in about 30 minutes while most approaches to single areas only takes about 10 or 15 minutes. 34 5.7 34 5.8 46 5.9 69 5.10 47 5.11 40 5.12
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
May 31, 2010, 2:03 PM
Post #97 of 97
(4223 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
kappydane wrote: I consider cragging to be quick access with a lot of routes close together. So I propose Horseshoe Canyon Ranch in Arkansas. Probably the most routes available in the smallest physical area. You can walk from one side of the ranch to the other in about 30 minutes while most approaches to single areas only takes about 10 or 15 minutes. 34 5.7 34 5.8 46 5.9 69 5.10 47 5.11 40 5.12 The original poster was looking specifically for trad climbs. Your list for HCR, which granted is an awesome place, would really be a LOT smaller if you were to narrow it down just to trad climbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|