|
LostinMaine
Mar 7, 2011, 10:31 PM
Post #76 of 509
(6833 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539
|
aprice00 wrote: This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF! RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing. Hmm... mid-sentence periods, pluralized selfs, and the assumption that we actually climb worth a damn makes your post a bigger "WTF" to me than this thread (aside from the OP suggesting that "the ice age" (which one?) commenced our journey toward tasty meats).
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Mar 7, 2011, 10:32 PM
Post #77 of 509
(6830 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
aprice00 wrote: This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF! RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing. Shows what you know, n00b.
|
|
|
|
|
aprice00
Mar 7, 2011, 10:44 PM
Post #78 of 509
(6818 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167
|
LostinMaine wrote: aprice00 wrote: This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF! RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing. Hmm... mid-sentence periods, pluralized selfs, and the assumption that we actually climb worth a damn makes your post a bigger "WTF" to me than this thread (aside from the OP suggesting that "the ice age" (which one?) commenced our journey toward tasty meats). Enigma's ignorance is contageos.. can't sPell...Me feel nead to Ovar jenaralize.. I like Taiking bout thinkgs
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Mar 7, 2011, 10:45 PM
Post #79 of 509
(6816 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
hafilax wrote: My GF and I have bought 1/8 of a cow from a friend's farm. It's not certified organic but it is grass fed and free range. We've also started buying produce from an organic delivery service that focuses on local or nearby seasonal produce. We still eat a lot of non-organic foods and it certainly doesn't rule our lives but small differences are still differences. I prefer Bison to grassfed beef, but both are better than 'regular' beef. Most of the meat from the local coop comes frozen which takes some of the freshnessout of it. Also, I use a mix of half ground lamb and half ground turkey to make better burgers.
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Mar 7, 2011, 10:47 PM
Post #80 of 509
(6814 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
Cool vids, definitely demonstrating power and agility but I'd argue that brachiating is a different item from climbing per se, since specialized shoulder anatomy is so critical to brachiation, and "holds" are plentiful and large.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 7, 2011, 10:49 PM
Post #81 of 509
(6815 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
saint_john wrote: In reply to: You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it. In reply to: you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs? None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place?
In reply to: In reply to: you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming I agree vegan diets tend to be slimming but they are not slimming per se. it's still possible to be a vegan and be overweight. Why do you keep posting that in different ways? It's not like anybody has said anything that would imply otherwise. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Mar 7, 2011, 11:12 PM
Post #82 of 509
(6797 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
LostinMaine wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability. While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically. Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run? That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA. The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people. The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag.
|
|
|
|
|
Bats
Mar 7, 2011, 11:13 PM
Post #83 of 509
(6793 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 486
|
I normally climb harder when I am Erock for I know I will get some Cooper's BBQ afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Mar 7, 2011, 11:33 PM
Post #84 of 509
(6778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
jt512 wrote: saint_john wrote: In reply to: You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it. In reply to: you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs? None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place? Jay Honest question: Do you see any particular proscriptive diet (that is, vegetarian, vegan, etc) as being more conducive to meeting your recommended fat/carb/protein proportions for weight loss for climbers?
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 7, 2011, 11:33 PM
Post #85 of 509
(6778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy. She said, veggi alone does not contain enough protein (in regards to volume) to keep the healthy cells.
(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Mar 7, 2011, 11:34 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Mar 7, 2011, 11:43 PM
Post #86 of 509
(6766 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
wonderwoman wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick. What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable? And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal. Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better. I guess it's a personal preference, though. well, actually, foods that are not local are more likely to not rot in your fridge. The fresher foods rot more quickly. But you're right about local and freshness. I'm not doubting your farm is organic, but be sure to check if it really is. Many of the farms in the boston area are organically farmed, which doesn't mean they are organic. the soil in boston isn't always the freshest, through no fault of the farm.
|
|
|
|
|
gosharks
Mar 7, 2011, 11:45 PM
Post #87 of 509
(6764 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
majid_sabet wrote: I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy./quote] So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"
|
|
|
|
|
jeepnphreak
Mar 7, 2011, 11:47 PM
Post #88 of 509
(6763 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259
|
enigma wrote: Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available. Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent. In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat. So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter? How about furbergers? I can go along time...
|
|
|
|
|
robx
Mar 8, 2011, 12:02 AM
Post #89 of 509
(6758 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108
|
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are... I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me. I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue. I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Mar 8, 2011, 12:32 AM
Post #90 of 509
(6731 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
gosharks wrote: majid_sabet wrote: I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy./quote] So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?" it had to do what animals eat so buying beef that only eats corn and other cheap substitute is not the same as a cow eating high nutrition grass found in nature. Same thing applies to fish grown in fish farms vs fish in the river or the ones in ocean. I also noticed that high quality veggies last longer in the frig vs cheap ones. When I buy stuff off trader joes, they have a tendency to last longer vs same product I buy off Safeway.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Mar 8, 2011, 12:36 AM
Post #91 of 509
(6724 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
robx wrote: I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are... I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me. I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue. I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine. thanks, for letting me eat meat, i appreciate it. nothing like a smug vegetarian
|
|
|
|
|
TarHeelEMT
Mar 8, 2011, 12:45 AM
Post #92 of 509
(6711 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724
|
wonderwoman wrote: I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick. Here are changes that I've noticed so far: I need to drink more water. I have more energy. I feel more awake in general. I am happier. I can't drink as much beer. My stomach aches are gone. That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy. Placebo is a hell of a drug.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 8, 2011, 12:48 AM
Post #93 of 509
(6709 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Rufsen wrote: wonderwoman wrote: kaizen wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat. While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example. Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody. Not really true. The levels of dioxins, PCB and PAH har been considerably reduced in the last ten years. And the "feed" does not change that in any way. True. But only in Norway, where they are regulating the amount of those toxins in the FEED. http://www.thefishsite.com/...ish-continue-to-fall Farmed fish for the rest of the world is still a problem. There is a lot of evidence to back this up. Halogenated contaminants in farmed salmon, trout, tilapia, pangasius, and shrimp. - van Leeuwen, et al; Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1 "From the five species investigated, (FARMED) salmon is predominantly responsible (97%) for human exposure to the sum of the investigated contaminants." (The bold is mine, but that's what the article says)
Rufsen wrote: Adults would need to eat a lot to get any neurological damage.The biggest problems have been in relation to large industrial spills in lakes and harbors. Yes, mercury has more impact on the developing brain, but you are way off on the source. Mercury pollution comes from power plants, incinerators, and other industries like paper plants rather than industrial spills in a body of water. It's what comes out of the plume, lands in the water, and then is converted from inorganic to methylmercury by anaerobic bacteria. Fish consume it and it moves up the food chain to the larger, predator fish. My toxicology exam is tomorrow. Wish me luck!
|
|
|
|
|
LostinMaine
Mar 8, 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #94 of 509
(6703 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: LostinMaine wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability. While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically. Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run? That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA. The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people. The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag. Me neither. This is because of a few reasons: 1. It is considered slander in a U.S. court of law to speak against either large seed or large animal industries (e.g. the Oprah fiasco, McLibel cases, Monsanto vs. everyone...) 2. It is not possible for the general public to view the butchering floor of an industrial meat processing facility. It is not possible for the general public to view inside of an industrial poultry house (even researchers with whom I work have signed disclosure clauses when measuring ambient levels of ammonia). They are not allowed to report locations of any of their test sites (mandated by the USDA). 3. The suits in the USDA are often employees of the industrial companies they are regulating. Incidentally, the USDA has no authority over processing guidelines and plant development. My question to you: Which "mega" processing facilities have you personally walked through (every level and every floor) that you are comparing the small butcher to?
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 8, 2011, 12:53 AM
Post #95 of 509
(6701 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
TarHeelEMT wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick. Here are changes that I've noticed so far: I need to drink more water. I have more energy. I feel more awake in general. I am happier. I can't drink as much beer. My stomach aches are gone. That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy. Placebo is a hell of a drug. Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? I just cut the dairy out.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #96 of 509
(6696 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
wonderwoman wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick. Here are changes that I've noticed so far: I need to drink more water. I have more energy. I feel more awake in general. I am happier. I can't drink as much beer. My stomach aches are gone. That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy. Placebo is a hell of a drug. Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? I just cut the dairy out. *face palm*
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #97 of 509
(6696 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
justroberto wrote: jt512 wrote: saint_john wrote: In reply to: You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it. In reply to: you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs? None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place? Jay Honest question: Do you see any particular proscriptive diet (that is, vegetarian, vegan, etc) as being more conducive to meeting your recommended fat/carb/protein proportions for weight loss for climbers? It's easiest if you include lean animal products in your diet, but you could do it on a veg*n diet by relying on fat-free soy products. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
TarHeelEMT
Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #98 of 509
(6695 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724
|
wonderwoman wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: wonderwoman wrote: I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick. Here are changes that I've noticed so far: I need to drink more water. I have more energy. I feel more awake in general. I am happier. I can't drink as much beer. My stomach aches are gone. That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy. Placebo is a hell of a drug. Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? I just cut the dairy out. Hahaha, good question. I'm not sure what I'd call this in a study.
|
|
|
|
|
LostinMaine
Mar 8, 2011, 1:01 AM
Post #99 of 509
(6693 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539
|
robx wrote: I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are... I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me. I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue. I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine. Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Mar 8, 2011, 1:06 AM
Post #100 of 509
(6682 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
Let the rabbits wear glasses!
|
|
|
|
|
|