Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


enigma


Mar 7, 2011, 6:57 AM
Post #1 of 509 (21519 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?


healyje


Mar 7, 2011, 9:09 AM
Post #2 of 509 (21486 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.

Humans are garbage disposal omnivores by design and capable of ingesting damn near anything they came across. The idea humans could have maintained healthy reproduction rates on pure vegetarian diets in the wild is pretty outlandish - they didn't have Whole Foods down the street. Scientists today typically hold exactly the opposite view...

From http://en.wikipedia.org/...sm_and_controversies:

Wikipedia wrote:
The mainstream view among anthropologists is that the increases in human brain-size occurred well before the advent of cooking (common around 250,000 years ago), due to a shift away from the consumption of nuts and berries to the consumption of meat.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human:

Wikipedia wrote:
Human nutrition

Humans are omnivorous, capable of consuming plant, animal, and inorganic material.[84][85] Varying with available food sources in regions of habitation, and also varying with cultural and religious norms, human groups have adopted a range of diets, from purely vegetarian to primarily carnivorous. In some cases, dietary restrictions in humans can lead to deficiency diseases; however, stable human groups have adapted to many dietary patterns through both genetic specialization and cultural conventions to use nutritionally balanced food sources.[86] The human diet is prominently reflected in human culture, and has led to the development of food science.

Until the development of agriculture approximately 10,000 years ago, Homo sapiens employed a hunter-gatherer method as their sole means of food collection. This involved combining stationary food sources (such as fruits, grains, tubers, and mushrooms, insect larvae and aquatic molluscs) with wild game, which must be hunted and killed in order to be consumed.[87] It has been proposed that members of H. sapiens have used fire to prepare and cook food since the time of their divergence from Homo rhodesiensis (which itself had previously speciated from Homo erectus).[88] Around ten thousand years ago, humans developed agriculture,[89] which substantially altered their diet. This change in diet may also have altered human biology; with the spread of dairy farming providing a new and rich source of food, leading to the evolution of the ability to digest lactose in some adults.[90][91] Agriculture led to increased populations, the development of cities, and because of increased population density, the wider spread of infectious diseases. The types of food consumed, and the way in which they are prepared, has varied widely by time, location, and culture.

In general, humans can survive for two to eight weeks without food, depending on stored body fat. Survival without water is usually limited to three or four days. About 36 million humans starve to death every year, due to lack of edible materials in their habitats.[92] Childhood malnutrition is also common and contributes to the global burden of disease.[93] However global food distribution is not even, and obesity among some human populations has increased rapidly, leading to health complications and increased mortality in some developed, and a few developing countries. Worldwide over one billion people are obese,[94] while in the United States 35% of people are obese, leading to this being described as an "obesity epidemic".[95] Obesity is caused by consuming more calories than are expended, so excessive weight gain is usually caused by a combination of an energy-dense high fat diet and insufficient exercise.[94]


Partner philbox
Moderator

Mar 7, 2011, 9:34 AM
Post #3 of 509 (21478 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105

Re: [healyje] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (15 ratings)  
Can't Post

If God had of meant us to be vegetarians, he wouldn't have made cows out of meat.

Meatatarians unite. Laugh


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 1:34 PM
Post #4 of 509 (21436 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [philbox] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 7, 2011, 1:39 PM
Post #5 of 509 (21429 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.

Maybe you are just dairy-sensitive then?


blueeyedclimber


Mar 7, 2011, 1:42 PM
Post #6 of 509 (21428 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

Nutrition and diet is only one of the many contributors to athletic performance.

I don't think there has been any climbing-specific studies (although I could be wrong), but nutrition and it's impact on performance has been studied for quite some time.

As far as your question goes, I eat meat. My wife is vegan. We both climb pretty well. I do climb harder but I am pretty sure it's not because of our diet.

Josh


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 1:42 PM
Post #7 of 509 (21426 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm making a slow transition to veganism. I stopped eating meat almost a year ago. I still eat eggs and cheese but will stop doing that soon.
I've never felt better or been leaner. I sleep better at night, have more energy during the day and am performing better at sports.


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 2:03 PM
Post #8 of 509 (21403 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
Maybe you are just dairy-sensitive then?

Yeah - lactose intolerance is what I'm thinking, too.


krusher4


Mar 7, 2011, 3:08 PM
Post #9 of 509 (21359 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2005
Posts: 997

Re: [philbox] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
If God had of meant us to be vegetarians, he wouldn't have made cows out of meat.

Meatatarians unite. Laugh
and he wouldn't have made them so damn tasty


jcosgrove


Mar 7, 2011, 3:15 PM
Post #10 of 509 (21338 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 12

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

Everybody is different. Experiment, keep daily food/exercise/"how you feel" logs, and find what works for you.


sp115


Mar 7, 2011, 3:20 PM
Post #11 of 509 (21325 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515

Re: [krusher4] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

krusher4 wrote:
philbox wrote:
If God had of meant us to be vegetarians, he wouldn't have made cows out of meat.

Meatatarians unite. Laugh
and he wouldn't have made them so damn tasty

I generally accept as proof there is no god, the fact that Breyers mint chocolate-chip ice cream doesn't have the same caloric and nutitional content as broccoli.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 3:37 PM
Post #12 of 509 (21307 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share....
Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.

First, there is no such thing as "nearly vegan", just as there isn't the condition of being nearly pregnant. As long as you're eating eggs, you're an ovo-vegetarian.

Being a strict vegan is probably harder than you think. You would also have to avoid:

many wines and beers - isinglass (a very pure form of gelatin from sturgeon fish bladders), gelatin (extract from boiled cow's or pig's hooves and sinews), egg whites (or albumin) and casein (mile protein) are all used in the production of wines and beers and are not vegan

Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

Foods containing gelatin.

Vegetables (even organic) that are produced by using animal blood and bone meal as fertilizers.

Honey.

And if you're really strict...

you don't use anything made of fur, leather, or wool

soaps containing lanolin (made from wool) or made from animal fat

rennet (an enzyme found in the stomach of calves, young goats, and lambs that's used in cheese-making)

silk (made by silkworms)

shellac (the resinous secretion of the tiny lac insect)

cochineal (a red dye derived from the cochineal insect)

toothpaste containing calcium extracted from animal bones


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 3:46 PM
Post #13 of 509 (21293 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Yep - sadly, I quit Guinness awhile back since I learned it's not vegetarian. And I'm not giving up yeast or honey. But since I make most of my own food, I know what I am eating. It's not processed & it's healthier.


Partner macherry


Mar 7, 2011, 4:02 PM
Post #14 of 509 (21278 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share....
Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.

First, there is no such thing as "nearly vegan", just as there isn't the condition of being nearly pregnant. As long as you're eating eggs, you're an ovo-vegetarian.

Being a strict vegan is probably harder than you think. You would also have to avoid:

many wines and beers - isinglass (a very pure form of gelatin from sturgeon fish bladders), gelatin (extract from boiled cow's or pig's hooves and sinews), egg whites (or albumin) and casein (mile protein) are all used in the production of wines and beers and are not vegan

Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

Foods containing gelatin.

Vegetables (even organic) that are produced by using animal blood and bone meal as fertilizers.

Honey.

And if you're really strict...

you don't use anything made of fur, leather, or wool

soaps containing lanolin (made from wool) or made from animal fat

rennet (an enzyme found in the stomach of calves, young goats, and lambs that's used in cheese-making)

silk (made by silkworms)

shellac (the resinous secretion of the tiny lac insect)

cochineal (a red dye derived from the cochineal insect)

toothpaste containing calcium extracted from animal bones

sounds delightful

for the most part, i follow the michael pollan rule, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." i don't do dairy, other than a small bit of cheese because it makes me feel like crap. i try to shop locally, and never eat fast food, and keep the crap junk food out of the house.


i could never give up my murphy's stout


redonkulus


Mar 7, 2011, 4:06 PM
Post #15 of 509 (21269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 2, 2010
Posts: 216

Re: [sp115] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I would rather suffocate in a swimming pool of Breyer's Mint Chocolate Chip Ice Cream than any other death.


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 4:15 PM
Post #16 of 509 (21259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [redonkulus] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

It all boils down to personal choice. the bottom line is that is possible to be veagn and be a world class athlete. just ask Mac Danzig or Steph Davis.


lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 7, 2011, 4:24 PM
Post #17 of 509 (21248 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
for the most part, i follow the michael pollan rule, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." i don't do dairy, other than a small bit of cheese because it makes me feel like crap. i try to shop locally, and never eat fast food, and keep the crap junk food out of the house.


i could never give up my murphy's stout

+1, except for the murphy's stout part.

I have experimented with being vegetarian for a while. I have tried giving up all gluten foods and dairy for a month when I was helping a friend transition to gluten-free dairy-free diet.

I can honestly say that I have never felt any different, regardless of what I was eating. I have always eat healthily, following seasonal diet, more or less, with big emphasis on fresh and local fruits and veggies, and local organic meat, dairy and eggs. But I have never felt any different when I had given up meat, or dairy, or anything else. I've never had any stomachaches, headaches, bloating, heartburn, flatulence, or any other symptoms that people commonly cite as being affected by their food choices.

And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.


Partner happiegrrrl


Mar 7, 2011, 4:54 PM
Post #18 of 509 (21217 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

To choose a diet ONLY to climb harder seems to go against any traditionalist views, I think. Gotta be a sport climber thang!


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 5:01 PM
Post #19 of 509 (21210 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [happiegrrrl] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

If you lose weight if might.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 5:17 PM
Post #20 of 509 (21194 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.

No one food is particularly bad. There are no junk foods - only junk diets.


lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 7, 2011, 5:37 PM
Post #21 of 509 (21171 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.

No one food is particularly bad. There are no junk foods - only junk diets.

Umm... Yesterday I was offered some "BaCos" to put on my salad. BaCos are those fake bacon bits that are actually made out of soy protein, partially hydrogenated oil, and "artificial smoke flavoring".

I am pretty sure that THAT food is as junk as they come. If it can even be called food in the first place...

And for the record, I refused.

That is a typical example of something that is technically vegetarian, but probably just as bad for you, if not worse, than the real bacon would be.


vegastradguy


Mar 7, 2011, 5:44 PM
Post #22 of 509 (21158 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [happiegrrrl] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

To choose a diet ONLY to climb harder seems to go against any traditionalist views, I think. Gotta be a sport climber thang!

nah, i turned into a sport climber recently and i'm still a meatasaurus. of course, i'm weak as hell compared to the mutants running around my gym...but they all eat meat too. they actually tell me to eat MORE meat to get stronger. advice i can get behind.


Partner happiegrrrl


Mar 7, 2011, 5:53 PM
Post #23 of 509 (21145 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

If you lose weight if might.

I lost weight in the last 2 years from living in a non-electric cabin without a car, and living on the road. The less sedentary lifestyle was the reason for loss. My diet is pretty similar as it was. It is easier to get up stuff being lighter, that is true. But for me, it wasn't the diet that did it.


potreroed


Mar 7, 2011, 5:55 PM
Post #24 of 509 (21142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2001
Posts: 1454

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There was a time in my life when I didn't climb for almost 5 years (moved to big city, raising family, starting own business etc) during which I was almost completely vegetarian.
When I started climbing again (divorced the wife, sold the business) I began craving, and eating, meat.
I know many strong climbers--some eat meat, others are strict vegetarians.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 5:56 PM
Post #25 of 509 (21141 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
That is a typical example of something that is technically vegetarian, but probably just as bad for you, if not worse, than the real bacon would be.
Remember that breaded, deep-fried vegetables slathered with mayo or melted cheese are vegetarian as well.

A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.


Partner macherry


Mar 7, 2011, 6:06 PM
Post #26 of 509 (6127 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
That is a typical example of something that is technically vegetarian, but probably just as bad for you, if not worse, than the real bacon would be.
Remember that breaded, deep-fried vegetables slathered with mayo or melted cheese are vegetarian as well.

A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

i have a friend who is a chubby vegetarian. the last time i saw him, he was eating deep fried mozzarella sticks.


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 6:08 PM
Post #27 of 509 (6126 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 6:14 PM
Post #28 of 509 (6117 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

 
In reply to:
i have a friend who is a chubby vegetarian. the last time i saw him, he was eating deep fried mozzarella sticks.

i know a few overweight vegetarians too. Sugar and cheese are their downfalls.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 6:21 PM
Post #29 of 509 (6112 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.


jt512


Mar 7, 2011, 6:23 PM
Post #30 of 509 (6106 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio

You don't know what you're talking about. Vegans on average are leaner than either omnivores or ovo-lacto-vegetarians.

Jay


Gmburns2000


Mar 7, 2011, 6:25 PM
Post #31 of 509 (6105 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat. I do eat other kinds of meat, but mostly because I like the taste (especially lamb and duck....oh god, so good!), not out of any kind of dietary regiment. I don't eat a lot of meat other than fish, however. I eat fish probably two-four times per week and other kinds of meat probably 2-4 per month.

I have found that fruits and vegetables keep me feeling pretty energetic throughout the day if I'm eating them on a regular basis. However, I feel as if I lack energy over the long term without adding meat into my diet. I am susceptible to getting sick when I lose energy over the long term, so keeping my diet balanced is pretty important to my overall health.

The thing that kills me is the junk food. I never eat fast food, but man do I like cookies and yellow cake.Angelic


Partner macherry


Mar 7, 2011, 6:28 PM
Post #32 of 509 (6098 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
macherry wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.


jesus christ, get your quotes right. i'm a beer drinker, through and through, and not a vegan.

marc01 posted this.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 6:31 PM
Post #33 of 509 (6090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Saint John wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
macherry wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.


jesus christ, get your quotes right. i'm a beer drinker, through and through, and not a vegan.

marc01 posted this.

I'm reporting this belligerent and probably drunken attack!


Partner macherry


Mar 7, 2011, 6:38 PM
Post #34 of 509 (6080 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
macherry wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.


jesus christ, get your quotes right. i'm a beer drinker, through and through, and not a vegan.

marc01 posted this.

I'm reporting this belligerent and probably drunken attack!

you can't, i'm a greenie


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 6:44 PM
Post #35 of 509 (6072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Climbs4fun wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
macherry wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.


jesus christ, get your quotes right. i'm a beer drinker, through and through, and not a vegan.

marc01 posted this.

I'm reporting this belligerent and probably drunken attack!

you can't, i'm a greenie

Come see the violence inherent in the system!


milesenoell


Mar 7, 2011, 6:52 PM
Post #36 of 509 (6065 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.


Partner xtrmecat


Mar 7, 2011, 7:01 PM
Post #37 of 509 (6055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 548

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
macherry wrote:
for the most part, i follow the michael pollan rule, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." i don't do dairy, other than a small bit of cheese because it makes me feel like crap. i try to shop locally, and never eat fast food, and keep the crap junk food out of the house.


i could never give up my murphy's stout

+1, except for the murphy's stout part.

I have experimented with being vegetarian for a while. I have tried giving up all gluten foods and dairy for a month when I was helping a friend transition to gluten-free dairy-free diet.

I can honestly say that I have never felt any different, regardless of what I was eating. I have always eat healthily, following seasonal diet, more or less, with big emphasis on fresh and local fruits and veggies, and local organic meat, dairy and eggs. But I have never felt any different when I had given up meat, or dairy, or anything else. I've never had any stomachaches, headaches, bloating, heartburn, flatulence, or any other symptoms that people commonly cite as being affected by their food choices.

And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.



I also have done as above, with the exact same results. My little experiment was around four months though.

Burly Bob


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 7:11 PM
Post #38 of 509 (6048 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio

You don't know what you're talking about. Vegans on average are leaner than either omnivores or ovo-lacto-vegetarians.

Jay

Simmer down Jay. My point was that with a veg diet, protein and carbs go hand in hand as opposed to meat wich is protein without carbs.

of course vegans are leaner on average than omnivores. the average vegan is an extremely health conscious person. the average omnivore doesn't give a fuck.


Lbrombach


Mar 7, 2011, 7:27 PM
Post #39 of 509 (6033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2010
Posts: 149

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm vegetarian 94.4% of the time...that is- since I only eat meat 3 or 4 times/day, and it only takes me 20 or so minutes to eat, there are roughly 22.66 hours/day that I'm not consuming animal products. If giving up meat 94.4% of the time didn't improve my climbing, I'm pretty sure eliminating that last 5.6 % of the time won't make me any better either.


jt512


Mar 7, 2011, 7:29 PM
Post #40 of 509 (6029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio

You don't know what you're talking about. Vegans on average are leaner than either omnivores or ovo-lacto-vegetarians.

Jay

Simmer down Jay. My point was that with a veg diet, protein and carbs go hand in hand as opposed to meat wich is protein without carbs.

of course vegans are leaner on average than omnivores. the average vegan is an extremely health conscious person. the average omnivore doesn't give a fuck.

You still don't know what you're talking about. You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue; you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue; you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming, because they are less energy dense than omnivore diets (ie, they contain more fiber and less fat); and basically you're still talking out your ass on a topic you know nothing about.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 7, 2011, 7:30 PM)


kaizen


Mar 7, 2011, 7:33 PM
Post #41 of 509 (6017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2009
Posts: 154

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 7:33 PM
Post #42 of 509 (6017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [Lbrombach] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Lbrombach wrote:
I'm vegetarian 94.4% of the time...that is- since I only eat meat 3 or 4 times/day, and it only takes me 20 or so minutes to eat, there are roughly 22.66 hours/day that I'm not consuming animal products. If giving up meat 94.4% of the time didn't improve my climbing, I'm pretty sure eliminating that last 5.6 % of the time won't make me any better either.

If you eat meat 3 or 4 times a day your body is pretty much always consuming meat.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 7:35 PM
Post #43 of 509 (6016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
Marc801 wrote:
Actually, since wine and beer must be made with yeast, you wouldn't drink them on that basis alone (if you're psychotic about being vegan).

If you're going to go to all the trouble of being vegan then one would think you'd buy beer that wasn't 'manufactured' with so many adjuncts.

I don't understand why vegans couldn't eat yeast.

That was a jab at some clueless vegans I've met. Shocking as it may seem, I've met some poorly educated vegans who think that yeasts are actually from the animal kingdom. The first time I just thought it was an outlier more than 3 standard deviations from the mean...then I met two more. Maybe they took the meme of "drinking yeast piss and burping yeast farts" when you drink beer too literally. Hence my use of "psychotic".


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 7:43 PM
Post #44 of 509 (6006 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
Shocking as it may seem, I've met some poorly educated vegans...

Nope, not shocked in the least.


chadnsc


Mar 7, 2011, 7:49 PM
Post #45 of 509 (5998 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

If you lose weight if might.


If you didn't cheese your quote we could understand you better fatty. Tongue


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 7:52 PM
Post #46 of 509 (5992 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [kaizen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.


chadnsc


Mar 7, 2011, 7:52 PM
Post #47 of 509 (5991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio

You don't know what you're talking about. Vegans on average are leaner than either omnivores or ovo-lacto-vegetarians.

Jay

Simmer down Jay. My point was that with a veg diet, protein and carbs go hand in hand as opposed to meat wich is protein without carbs.

of course vegans are leaner on average than omnivores. the average vegan is an extremely health conscious person. the average omnivore doesn't give a fuck.

You still don't know what you're talking about. You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue; you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue; you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming, because they are less energy dense than omnivore diets (ie, they contain more fiber and less fat); and basically you're still talking out your ass on a topic you know nothing about.

Jay

I'd listen to Jay on this one, I mean it is the mans specialty.

Nutrition I mean, not SJ talking out of his ass. Wink


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 7:54 PM
Post #48 of 509 (5991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

In reply to:
you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming
I agree vegan diets tend to be slimming but they are not slimming per se. it's still possible to be a vegan and be overweight.


(This post was edited by saint_john on Mar 7, 2011, 8:01 PM)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 7, 2011, 8:35 PM
Post #49 of 509 (5955 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.


jt512


Mar 7, 2011, 8:37 PM
Post #50 of 509 (5954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

No, you insinuated that you believe it: "[G]etting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs. [E]xample . . . [I]n other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio[.]"

In reply to:
In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

Yes, typically vegan diets are higher in carbohydrate than omnivore diets, but they don't contain "a ton of 'carbs'." They generally contain a healthy amount of carbohydrate.

In reply to:
In reply to:
you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming
I agree vegan diets tend to be slimming but they are not slimming per se. it's still possible to be a vegan and be overweight.

You're right. They're not slimming per se because there is no single vegan diet. And of course I didn't say they were slimming per se; I said that "typically" they are, which is true. And if you believe that then why should someone "going vegan prepare to do a lot of 'cardio'"?

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 7, 2011, 8:40 PM)


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 8:52 PM
Post #51 of 509 (6406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.


hafilax


Mar 7, 2011, 8:57 PM
Post #52 of 509 (6405 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [xtrmecat] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

xtrmecat wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
macherry wrote:
for the most part, i follow the michael pollan rule, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." i don't do dairy, other than a small bit of cheese because it makes me feel like crap. i try to shop locally, and never eat fast food, and keep the crap junk food out of the house.


i could never give up my murphy's stout

+1, except for the murphy's stout part.

I have experimented with being vegetarian for a while. I have tried giving up all gluten foods and dairy for a month when I was helping a friend transition to gluten-free dairy-free diet.

I can honestly say that I have never felt any different, regardless of what I was eating. I have always eat healthily, following seasonal diet, more or less, with big emphasis on fresh and local fruits and veggies, and local organic meat, dairy and eggs. But I have never felt any different when I had given up meat, or dairy, or anything else. I've never had any stomachaches, headaches, bloating, heartburn, flatulence, or any other symptoms that people commonly cite as being affected by their food choices.

And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.



I also have done as above, with the exact same results. My little experiment was around four months though.

Burly Bob
Similar story for me as well. I did a "Paleo Challenge" with a bunch of friends which meant no grains, no legumes and no dairy for 30 days. With all those carbs eliminated the fat and protein content my diet definitely went up.

I didn't really notice much difference from my regular diet and after a month of being back on my regular diet I again don't feel any different. I certainly haven't experienced the epiphany that many Paleo Diet proponents have felt.

The changes I have made to my diet since are that I am now trying to avoid processed foods and limit my intake of wheat. I still eat bread and pasta, just not as much as I used to.


Partner macherry


Mar 7, 2011, 9:09 PM
Post #53 of 509 (6388 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

did Toast actually say he was in favour of industrial farming? i get the point he's making, about industrial farming. what defines industrial farming. Maybe factory farming is a more apt description.

i also have issues with the word "organic". there are no real regulations with regards to what makes something organic.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 9:13 PM
Post #54 of 509 (6386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

At this point in the discussion, this seems apropos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-Ruc1dMsm0

It's a little on the long side at almost 11 minutes, but it captures some of the key thoughts here.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 9:13 PM
Post #55 of 509 (6386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

She's probably referring to the growth hormones given to the animals to make them produce faster. The antibiotics that are given to them because they live packed in their own feces, lying in them when they can't stand because their legs haven't grown fast enough to support their bodies. The ammonia that is used to kill bacterium like E. Coli, because the cows are fed corn instead of grass. Etc.


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 9:14 PM
Post #56 of 509 (6385 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue

Perhaps my use of the word "ton" (2000 pounds) was a bit of an exaggeration.

So...other than nuts or soy is there a vegan food source that does not also contain 'carbs'. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass, I'd really like to know.

In reply to:
And if you believe that then why should someone "going vegan prepare to do a lot of 'cardio'"?

Vegans need to be prepared to do a lot of cardio. Omnivores need to be prepared to do a lot of cardio. Everyone needs to do a lot of cardio.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 9:14 PM
Post #57 of 509 (6385 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

oops, didn't see page 3. GUd.


wonderwoman


Mar 7, 2011, 9:15 PM
Post #58 of 509 (6382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

did Toast actually say he was in favour of industrial farming? i get the point he's making, about industrial farming. what defines industrial farming. Maybe factory farming is a more apt description.

i also have issues with the word "organic". there are no real regulations with regards to what makes something organic.

I'm just going by every food conversation that I have had with Toast. If Toast is not pro - industrial agg, then i apologize. But i would love to hear from Toast because I'm pretty well convinced.

My CSA is organic. I agree that the labeling criteria is too loose. But that's also a result of big agriculture lobbying for looser regulations.


marc801


Mar 7, 2011, 9:20 PM
Post #60 of 509 (6377 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
i also have issues with the word "organic". there are no real regulations with regards to what makes something organic.
That was the case prior to 2002. Things have been tightened up considerably:
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop


Partner cracklover


Mar 7, 2011, 9:25 PM
Post #61 of 509 (6368 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [milesenoell] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.

Nonsense. Chimps are reasonably decent climbers, and orangutans are excellent. Another ape in our family is the gibbon - one of the best climbers in all the animal kingdom.

GO


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 9:28 PM
Post #62 of 509 (6361 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.

Nonsense. Chimps are reasonably decent climbers, and orangutans are excellent. Another ape in our family is the gibbon - one of the best climbers in all the animal kingdom.

GO

Seriosuly dude?! EVERYONE knows that Chimps are better climbers than Gibbons. Because Gibbons are Vegan, they have to do a lot of cardio to maintain their weight. They have less time to practice climbing.


(This post was edited by saint_john on Mar 7, 2011, 9:34 PM)


caughtinside


Mar 7, 2011, 9:31 PM
Post #63 of 509 (6354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

I have a number of friends who have objections to the mass produced meat industry in this country. Several of them buy a cow or a pig produced at a smaller farm and keep it in a deep freeze.

I can't say I have personal knowledge of the treatment or diet these animals receive, but it is CA, so I'm sure someof them live in better conditions than half of humanity.

Also, this comment has no bearing on if someone is a veg/vegan for other reasons.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 9:32 PM
Post #64 of 509 (6351 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
cracklover wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.

Nonsense. Chimps are reasonably decent climbers, and orangutans are excellent. Another ape in our family is the gibbon - one of the best climbers in all the animal kingdom.

GO

maybe so but could a Gibbon beat Daniel Woods in a redpoint format bouldering comp?? someone needs to set that shit up.

I'll buy that gibbon all the bananas it could ever want if it beats Daniel Woods with a boulder, or any blunt object.


saint_john


Mar 7, 2011, 9:36 PM
Post #65 of 509 (6341 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'll buy that gibbon all the bananas it could ever want if it beats Daniel Woods with a boulder, or any blunt object.
A Gibbon would love that since they are vegan.


Partner camhead


Mar 7, 2011, 9:41 PM
Post #66 of 509 (6329 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.

Nonsense. Chimps are reasonably decent climbers, and orangutans are excellent. Another ape in our family is the gibbon - one of the best climbers in all the animal kingdom.

GO

Yeah, and don't forget Bonobos! When they can find the time to stop humping, they are awesome climbers! A lot like me. Woops.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 7, 2011, 9:43 PM
Post #67 of 509 (6326 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture.
Easy, I don't think the problem is the size of company involved.
wonderwoman wrote:
I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed.

The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

And not polluting includes greenhouse gasses which are often reduced with scale on the supply chain.

wonderwoman wrote:
I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

Most food is sourced as locally as possible and as fuel prices rise, logistics will play an even bigger role. But this time of year, where I live, there are no flavorful carrots.


gblauer
Moderator

Mar 7, 2011, 9:45 PM
Post #68 of 509 (6316 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2002
Posts: 2824

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have been a vegetarian for 41 years, bordering on vegan. I suck as a climber. Maybe I should eat meat.


milesenoell


Mar 7, 2011, 9:55 PM
Post #69 of 509 (6299 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Since others have beaten to death that your first assertion is incorrect, let me move on to the second.
In reply to:
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

Monkeys are indeed adept climbers, but our side of the family tree, the great apes, not so much. Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees and bonobos, are not skilled climbers. They also aren't vegetarians, but that was already pointed out.

Nonsense. Chimps are reasonably decent climbers, and orangutans are excellent. Another ape in our family is the gibbon - one of the best climbers in all the animal kingdom.

GO

I think this is a half-full half empty situation. Chimps are decent climbers--like us--but compared to other primates they are decidedly below average. Cercopithecines (monkeys) blow apes out of the water.


hafilax


Mar 7, 2011, 9:56 PM
Post #70 of 509 (6298 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My GF and I have bought 1/8 of a cow from a friend's farm. It's not certified organic but it is grass fed and free range. We've also started buying produce from an organic delivery service that focuses on local or nearby seasonal produce.

We still eat a lot of non-organic foods and it certainly doesn't rule our lives but small differences are still differences.


Partner cracklover


Mar 7, 2011, 10:07 PM
Post #71 of 509 (6288 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gibbons rock! Here are a few youtube vids.

Check out this video of a gibbon brachiating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRJA8pZ8JCA

How 'bout the guns on this guy (and the grace!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acy--k7Qww0

How 'bout that double-dyno starting at 0:19 Holy crap!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLSVt9CWSpc

GO


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 7, 2011, 10:14 PM
Post #72 of 509 (6279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
macherry wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

did Toast actually say he was in favour of industrial farming? i get the point he's making, about industrial farming. what defines industrial farming. Maybe factory farming is a more apt description.

i also have issues with the word "organic". there are no real regulations with regards to what makes something organic.

I'm just going by every food conversation that I have had with Toast. If Toast is not pro - industrial agg, then i apologize. But i would love to hear from Toast because I'm pretty well convinced.

My CSA is organic. I agree that the labeling criteria is too loose. But that's also a result of big agriculture lobbying for looser regulations.

I am not really pro-industrial agg, it is that I don't have an emotional attachment to any player in the food biz. It is a business, and every player is in it for profit. I've met players in the game large and small, some are honest and earnest; some are deceitful bastards. The size of the organization they represent is not indicative of their character.

For fun on food lobbyists:
http://www.slate.com/id/2275860


aprice00


Mar 7, 2011, 10:26 PM
Post #73 of 509 (6260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF!

RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing.


LostinMaine


Mar 7, 2011, 10:26 PM
Post #74 of 509 (6257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically.

Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run?

That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA.


Rufsen


Mar 7, 2011, 10:31 PM
Post #75 of 509 (6248 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Not really true. The levels of dioxins, PCB and PAH har been considerably reduced in the last ten years. And the "feed" does not change that in any way.

And the japanese and americans comsume roughly the same amount of toxic contaminants, despite the fact that you eat a lot less fish on average.

Hg is still a problem. So pregnant women should stay away from predatory fish, and large fish in general. The reason Hg is so dangereous is its ability to enter the placenta.

Adults would need to eat a lot to get any neurological damage. The biggest problems have been in relation to large industrial spills in lakes and harbors.

The problem with aquaculture is really algea, apart from the ethical questions of course.


LostinMaine


Mar 7, 2011, 10:31 PM
Post #76 of 509 (6831 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF!

RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing.

Hmm... mid-sentence periods, pluralized selfs, and the assumption that we actually climb worth a damn makes your post a bigger "WTF" to me than this thread (aside from the OP suggesting that "the ice age" (which one?) commenced our journey toward tasty meats).


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 7, 2011, 10:32 PM
Post #77 of 509 (6828 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF!

RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing.

Shows what you know, n00b.


aprice00


Mar 7, 2011, 10:44 PM
Post #78 of 509 (6816 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [LostinMaine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LostinMaine wrote:
aprice00 wrote:
This WHOLE thread. is a big WTF!

RC.com do yourselfs a favor and stick to climbing.

Hmm... mid-sentence periods, pluralized selfs, and the assumption that we actually climb worth a damn makes your post a bigger "WTF" to me than this thread (aside from the OP suggesting that "the ice age" (which one?) commenced our journey toward tasty meats).
Enigma's ignorance is contageos.. can't sPell...Me feel nead to Ovar jenaralize.. I like Taiking bout thinkgs


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 7, 2011, 10:45 PM
Post #79 of 509 (6814 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
My GF and I have bought 1/8 of a cow from a friend's farm. It's not certified organic but it is grass fed and free range. We've also started buying produce from an organic delivery service that focuses on local or nearby seasonal produce.

We still eat a lot of non-organic foods and it certainly doesn't rule our lives but small differences are still differences.

I prefer Bison to grassfed beef, but both are better than 'regular' beef. Most of the meat from the local coop comes frozen which takes some of the freshnessout of it. Also, I use a mix of half ground lamb and half ground turkey to make better burgers.


milesenoell


Mar 7, 2011, 10:47 PM
Post #80 of 509 (6812 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Gibbons rock! Here are a few youtube vids.

Check out this video of a gibbon brachiating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRJA8pZ8JCA

How 'bout the guns on this guy (and the grace!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acy--k7Qww0

How 'bout that double-dyno starting at 0:19 Holy crap!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLSVt9CWSpc

GO

Cool vids, definitely demonstrating power and agility but I'd argue that brachiating is a different item from climbing per se, since specialized shoulder anatomy is so critical to brachiation, and "holds" are plentiful and large.


jt512


Mar 7, 2011, 10:49 PM
Post #81 of 509 (6813 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place?

In reply to:
In reply to:
you still don't understand that vegan diets tend to be slimming
I agree vegan diets tend to be slimming but they are not slimming per se. it's still possible to be a vegan and be overweight.

Why do you keep posting that in different ways? It's not like anybody has said anything that would imply otherwise.

Jay


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 7, 2011, 11:12 PM
Post #82 of 509 (6795 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [LostinMaine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LostinMaine wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically.

Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run?

That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA.

The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people.

The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag.


Bats


Mar 7, 2011, 11:13 PM
Post #83 of 509 (6791 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 486

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I normally climb harder when I am Erock for I know I will get some Cooper's BBQ afterwards.


justroberto


Mar 7, 2011, 11:33 PM
Post #84 of 509 (6776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place?

Jay

Honest question:

Do you see any particular proscriptive diet (that is, vegetarian, vegan, etc) as being more conducive to meeting your recommended fat/carb/protein proportions for weight loss for climbers?


majid_sabet


Mar 7, 2011, 11:33 PM
Post #85 of 509 (6776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy.

She said, veggi alone does not contain enough protein (in regards to volume) to keep the healthy cells.


(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Mar 7, 2011, 11:34 PM)


Gmburns2000


Mar 7, 2011, 11:43 PM
Post #86 of 509 (6764 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

well, actually, foods that are not local are more likely to not rot in your fridge. The fresher foods rot more quickly.

But you're right about local and freshness.

I'm not doubting your farm is organic, but be sure to check if it really is. Many of the farms in the boston area are organically farmed, which doesn't mean they are organic. the soil in boston isn't always the freshest, through no fault of the farm.


gosharks


Mar 7, 2011, 11:45 PM
Post #87 of 509 (6762 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy./quote]
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"


jeepnphreak


Mar 7, 2011, 11:47 PM
Post #88 of 509 (6761 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

How about furbergers? I can go along time...


robx


Mar 8, 2011, 12:02 AM
Post #89 of 509 (6756 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108

Re: [jeepnphreak] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.


majid_sabet


Mar 8, 2011, 12:32 AM
Post #90 of 509 (6729 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [gosharks] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy./quote]
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"

it had to do what animals eat so buying beef that only eats corn and other cheap substitute is not the same as a cow eating high nutrition grass found in nature. Same thing applies to fish grown in fish farms vs fish in the river or the ones in ocean. I also noticed that high quality veggies last longer in the frig vs cheap ones. When I buy stuff off trader joes, they have a tendency to last longer vs same product I buy off Safeway.


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 12:36 AM
Post #91 of 509 (6722 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

thanks, for letting me eat meat, i appreciate it.

nothing like a smug vegetarian


TarHeelEMT


Mar 8, 2011, 12:45 AM
Post #92 of 509 (6709 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


Placebo is a hell of a drug.


wonderwoman


Mar 8, 2011, 12:48 AM
Post #93 of 509 (6707 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [Rufsen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rufsen wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Not really true. The levels of dioxins, PCB and PAH har been considerably reduced in the last ten years. And the "feed" does not change that in any way.

True. But only in Norway, where they are regulating the amount of those toxins in the FEED.

http://www.thefishsite.com/...ish-continue-to-fall

Farmed fish for the rest of the world is still a problem. There is a lot of evidence to back this up.

Halogenated contaminants in farmed salmon, trout, tilapia, pangasius, and shrimp. - van Leeuwen, et al; Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1
"From the five species investigated, (FARMED) salmon is predominantly responsible (97%) for human exposure to the sum of the investigated contaminants."

(The bold is mine, but that's what the article says)

Rufsen wrote:
Adults would need to eat a lot to get any neurological damage.The biggest problems have been in relation to large industrial spills in lakes and harbors.

Yes, mercury has more impact on the developing brain, but you are way off on the source. Mercury pollution comes from power plants, incinerators, and other industries like paper plants rather than industrial spills in a body of water. It's what comes out of the plume, lands in the water, and then is converted from inorganic to methylmercury by anaerobic bacteria. Fish consume it and it moves up the food chain to the larger, predator fish.

My toxicology exam is tomorrow. Wish me luck!


LostinMaine


Mar 8, 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #94 of 509 (6701 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically.

Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run?

That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA.

The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people.

The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag.

Me neither. This is because of a few reasons:
1. It is considered slander in a U.S. court of law to speak against either large seed or large animal industries (e.g. the Oprah fiasco, McLibel cases, Monsanto vs. everyone...)
2. It is not possible for the general public to view the butchering floor of an industrial meat processing facility. It is not possible for the general public to view inside of an industrial poultry house (even researchers with whom I work have signed disclosure clauses when measuring ambient levels of ammonia). They are not allowed to report locations of any of their test sites (mandated by the USDA).
3. The suits in the USDA are often employees of the industrial companies they are regulating. Incidentally, the USDA has no authority over processing guidelines and plant development.

My question to you: Which "mega" processing facilities have you personally walked through (every level and every floor) that you are comparing the small butcher to?


wonderwoman


Mar 8, 2011, 12:53 AM
Post #95 of 509 (6699 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


Placebo is a hell of a drug.

Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? Wink I just cut the dairy out.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #96 of 509 (6694 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


Placebo is a hell of a drug.

Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? Wink I just cut the dairy out.


*face palm*


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #97 of 509 (6694 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [justroberto] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place?

Jay

Honest question:

Do you see any particular proscriptive diet (that is, vegetarian, vegan, etc) as being more conducive to meeting your recommended fat/carb/protein proportions for weight loss for climbers?

It's easiest if you include lean animal products in your diet, but you could do it on a veg*n diet by relying on fat-free soy products.

Jay


TarHeelEMT


Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #98 of 509 (6693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


Placebo is a hell of a drug.

Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? Wink I just cut the dairy out.

Hahaha, good question. I'm not sure what I'd call this in a study.


LostinMaine


Mar 8, 2011, 1:01 AM
Post #99 of 509 (6691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 8, 2007
Posts: 539

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 8, 2011, 1:06 AM
Post #100 of 509 (6680 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [LostinMaine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Let the rabbits wear glasses!


gosharks


Mar 8, 2011, 1:21 AM
Post #103 of 509 (5284 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy.
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"

it had to do what animals eat so buying beef that only eats corn and other cheap substitute is not the same as a cow eating high nutrition grass found in nature. Same thing applies to fish grown in fish farms vs fish in the river or the ones in ocean. I also noticed that high quality veggies last longer in the frig vs cheap ones. When I buy stuff off trader joes, they have a tendency to last longer vs same product I buy off Safeway.
That stuff all sounds better, but is there evidence that shows that the product that ends up in our stomachs is actually healthier? Honest question, not trying to stir anything up.


robx


Mar 8, 2011, 1:30 AM
Post #104 of 509 (5275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108

Re: [LostinMaine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

LostinMaine wrote:
robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?

To me it's not about being perfect. Yes a few gnats die. And yeah, the bike tubes I have might possibly be lined with some small animal product. and the wires in computers have some insane animal product. But if I can do my best to abstain from killing or hurting animals then I'm happy.

and yes, I understand the negative impact that over farming causes, but it's hard to find alternatives, and to me it really is more about doing the best you can, not being perfect.


robx


Mar 8, 2011, 1:33 AM
Post #105 of 509 (5269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.


Placebo is a hell of a drug.

Wouldn't that be un-placebo? Since nothing has taken it's place? Wink I just cut the dairy out.

Hahaha, good question. I'm not sure what I'd call this in a study.

I was vegetarian for a long time before I was vegan, and I definitely noticed that I felt healthier once I cut out dairy.
I'm also pretty sure I was getting messed up stomach stuff because of cheese. I was young when I went vegetarian and I replaced a lot of meat with more cheese. Made me really sick


robx


Mar 8, 2011, 1:36 AM
Post #106 of 509 (5266 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 11, 2011
Posts: 108

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Also I don't feel like I have more or less energy than my friends that eat meat. I agree with the placebo (or anti-placebo) point of view I guess.
I don't live a particularly healthy life either, so maybe I should start doing that.


majid_sabet


Mar 8, 2011, 1:37 AM
Post #107 of 509 (5263 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [gosharks] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy.
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"

it had to do what animals eat so buying beef that only eats corn and other cheap substitute is not the same as a cow eating high nutrition grass found in nature. Same thing applies to fish grown in fish farms vs fish in the river or the ones in ocean. I also noticed that high quality veggies last longer in the frig vs cheap ones. When I buy stuff off trader joes, they have a tendency to last longer vs same product I buy off Safeway.
That stuff all sounds better, but is there evidence that shows that the product that ends up in our stomachs is actually healthier? Honest question, not trying to stir anything up.


(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Mar 8, 2011, 7:07 PM)


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 1:56 AM
Post #108 of 509 (5254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robx wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?

To me it's not about being perfect. Yes a few gnats die. And yeah, the bike tubes I have might possibly be lined with some small animal product. and the wires in computers have some insane animal product. But if I can do my best to abstain from killing or hurting animals then I'm happy.

and yes, I understand the negative impact that over farming causes, but it's hard to find alternatives, and to me it really is more about doing the best you can, not being perfect.

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA


marc801


Mar 8, 2011, 1:57 AM
Post #109 of 509 (5252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
So you think your thoughts are far more important than those of anyone else. Then why should we take you seriously?

robx wrote:
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
You don't give a shit about what anyone has said for 4 pages, so we don't give a shit about your moral high ground. Meat tastes good. *Really* good. We raise animals specifically for food. We're at the top of the food chain, so we can do it. Tough shit. Go whine about it somewhere else.

robx wrote:
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
We're not necessarily healthier, but we sure seem happier and less conflicted.


aprice00


Mar 8, 2011, 2:12 AM
Post #110 of 509 (5235 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy.
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"

it had to do what animals eat so buying beef that only eats corn and other cheap substitute is not the same as a cow eating high nutrition grass found in nature. Same thing applies to fish grown in fish farms vs fish in the river or the ones in ocean. I also noticed that high quality veggies last longer in the frig vs cheap ones. When I buy stuff off trader joes, they have a tendency to last longer vs same product I buy off Safeway.
That stuff all sounds better, but is there evidence that shows that the product that ends up in our stomachs is actually healthier? Honest question, not trying to stir anything up.

try to veggie food for a day and you see you will end up dumping more often so yes, the stomach works better with veggie but you also need to add high protein food to help the cells grow and veggie by itself can not do that and substitute vitamin pills can not help either. not in long term.

All your cells are grow real strong.

(This post was edited by aprice00 on Mar 8, 2011, 2:22 AM)


aprice00


Mar 8, 2011, 2:17 AM
Post #111 of 509 (5228 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
We raise animals specifically for food. We're at the top of the food chain, so we can do it. Tough shit.
Anyone need a new Sig? bahahaaha


kachoong


Mar 8, 2011, 2:28 AM
Post #112 of 509 (5213 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [gosharks] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

gosharks wrote:
majid_sabet wrote:
I was eating 80% veggi food and 20% meat for 6 years but then I dates this nutritionist doctor who said hardcore veggi eaters will suffer in long term so she suggested that I shoud start eating high quality meat (vs cheap meat) in addition to veggies to stay healthy./quote]
So, without getting into organics, what is "high quality meat?"


Cheesetits give me gas.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 8, 2011, 2:35 AM
Post #113 of 509 (5209 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [LostinMaine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

LostinMaine wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically.

Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run?

That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA.

The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people.

The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag.

Me neither. This is because of a few reasons:
1. It is considered slander in a U.S. court of law to speak against either large seed or large animal industries (e.g. the Oprah fiasco, McLibel cases, Monsanto vs. everyone...)
2. It is not possible for the general public to view the butchering floor of an industrial meat processing facility. It is not possible for the general public to view inside of an industrial poultry house (even researchers with whom I work have signed disclosure clauses when measuring ambient levels of ammonia). They are not allowed to report locations of any of their test sites (mandated by the USDA).
3. The suits in the USDA are often employees of the industrial companies they are regulating. Incidentally, the USDA has no authority over processing guidelines and plant development.

My question to you: Which "mega" processing facilities have you personally walked through (every level and every floor) that you are comparing the small butcher to?

Yup, every level, every floor. From front to back (the only way you can go). Grow out houses (not the same day), and hatcheries (wing sexing facility, not butt sexing). Never got to see the turkey facilities, but heard good stories about Tom days. And a quick look at my profile should answer your question.

And I linked up thread an article where the mega food companies lost in congress.

And where in the scale of mega corps would you put American Peanut?


kachoong


Mar 8, 2011, 3:40 AM
Post #114 of 509 (5180 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
A serving of McDonald's oatmeal (with cream and sugar) contains 290 calories - a McDonald's cheeseburger contains....300.

There are numerous other examples.

thats a good point. getting the required amount of protein from a veg diet means that you're also consuming tons of carbs.
example: a sugar-free peanut butter sandwich on whole grain bread can have 20 grams of protein but also has almost 500 calories.
3 large eggs have 20 grams of protein at around 220 calories.
in other words, if you're going vegan prepare to do a lot of cardio

You don't know what you're talking about. Vegans on average are leaner than either omnivores or ovo-lacto-vegetarians.

Jay

Simmer down Jay. My point was that with a veg diet, protein and carbs go hand in hand as opposed to meat wich is protein without carbs.

of course vegans are leaner on average than omnivores. the average vegan is an extremely health conscious person. the average omnivore doesn't give a fuck.

But think of all those poor guys dating vegan chicks who don't swallow. That's gotta suck!


furgie


Mar 8, 2011, 4:07 AM
Post #115 of 509 (5166 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 29

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy


marc801


Mar 8, 2011, 6:32 AM
Post #116 of 509 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
Wow. Just wow.
Quoted for posterity.


enigma


Mar 8, 2011, 6:40 AM
Post #117 of 509 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.

I stopped eating meat and chicken 8 years ago. I found I was unable to digest it well.
Even when I would have good steak , I got a terribly nauseous.
Then I drove across the country and stopped in Nebraska, someone said do you know why our angus beef is so good? I said no. He said look at the cows, they are so happy we don't lock them up and they eat grass all day.
I stopped and looked at those cows, and indeed they looked happy, with their large brown eyes spending their days on the grass.
I tried to taste this angus beef, but I couldn't anymore. I felt for those cows, like the short story a "mothers tale".
However I continued to have fish, and eggs about once per week. Feeling concerned it would be difficult to have enough protein otherwise. I do drink organic hemp protein drinks.
Recently in the last month, I started to get sick to my stomach from eggs. Then I couldn't digest fish and also felt queasy.
So for now I'm not eating fish or eggs and dairy I rarely have.
Outside my window every morning their are little birds on the branches pecking and they look so happy and beautiful. How could I eat a bird.

Thanks for all the great comments.Smile

So anyone reach a conclusion ? I presume we would have to have many sets of identical twins and give them different diets and see which climbs better

So I was wondering has anyone read the blood type diet and feel that certain foods are better for the various blood types. A, B ,O , AB and their diet that goes along with that book?


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 8, 2011, 6:42 AM)


Rufsen


Mar 8, 2011, 7:42 AM
Post #118 of 509 (5117 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
True. But only in Norway, where they are regulating the amount of those toxins in the FEED.

http://www.thefishsite.com/...ish-continue-to-fall

Farmed fish for the rest of the world is still a problem. There is a lot of evidence to back this up.

Halogenated contaminants in farmed salmon, trout, tilapia, pangasius, and shrimp. - van Leeuwen, et al; Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1
"From the five species investigated, (FARMED) salmon is predominantly responsible (97%) for human exposure to the sum of the investigated contaminants."

(The bold is mine, but that's what the article says)

Rufsen wrote:
Adults would need to eat a lot to get any neurological damage.The biggest problems have been in relation to large industrial spills in lakes and harbors.

Yes, mercury has more impact on the developing brain, but you are way off on the source. Mercury pollution comes from power plants, incinerators, and other industries like paper plants rather than industrial spills in a body of water. It's what comes out of the plume, lands in the water, and then is converted from inorganic to methylmercury by anaerobic bacteria. Fish consume it and it moves up the food chain to the larger, predator fish.

My toxicology exam is tomorrow. Wish me luck!

Ah, another toxicology nerd. You're right about the sources for Hg of course, i var thinking the most important contributions to acute poisoning. Like Minimata in the 1950s.

And the PCB thing is interesting, i need to read that paper when i get enough coffee today. I should have guessed the state of aquaculture was that bad in the rest of the world. Pretty sad considering that its a lot of norwegian companies involved, and they know how youre supposed to do it in a sustainable way.

Good luck. I still have a few more months to read up on this stuff for mine.


Lbrombach


Mar 8, 2011, 12:55 PM
Post #119 of 509 (5096 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2010
Posts: 149

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I could be talking out of my ass...but doesn't eating lean meat (part. red meat) increase testosterone level which should subsequently give a boost to strength/endurance/aggressiveness on the wall? There's much more to it than that, but I'm way behind on sleep. (Also not good for testosterone levels).

I know at the very least it makes my wiener work better..that's reason enough for me to keep eating meat.


marc801


Mar 8, 2011, 2:17 PM
Post #120 of 509 (5080 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
I stopped eating meat and chicken 8 years ago. I found I was unable to digest it well.
Even when I would have good steak , I got a terribly nauseous.
Then I drove across the country and stopped in Nebraska, someone said do you know why our angus beef is so good? I said no. He said look at the cows, they are so happy we don't lock them up and they eat grass all day.
I stopped and looked at those cows, and indeed they looked happy, with their large brown eyes spending their days on the grass.
I tried to taste this angus beef, but I couldn't anymore. I felt for those cows, like the short story a "mothers tale".
However I continued to have fish, and eggs about once per week. Feeling concerned it would be difficult to have enough protein otherwise. I do drink organic hemp protein drinks.
Recently in the last month, I started to get sick to my stomach from eggs. Then I couldn't digest fish and also felt queasy.
So for now I'm not eating fish or eggs and dairy I rarely have.
Outside my window every morning their are little birds on the branches pecking and they look so happy and beautiful. How could I eat a bird.

Thanks for all the great comments.Smile

So anyone reach a conclusion ? I presume we would have to have many sets of identical twins and give them different diets and see which climbs better

So I was wondering has anyone read the blood type diet and feel that certain foods are better for the various blood types. A, B ,O , AB and their diet that goes along with that book?

You really need to see a doctor. Seriously. What you're describing can be indicative of a number of fairly serious problems. I suggest that you contact your primary physician soon and arrange to be examined by a gastroenterologist

After he or she is able to determine and treat any physiologic causes, then you can go to the clinical psychologist you so desperately need.


gmggg


Mar 8, 2011, 4:12 PM
Post #121 of 509 (5046 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Texas FTW!


spikeddem


Mar 8, 2011, 5:34 PM
Post #122 of 509 (5015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
YEE HAW


saint_john


Mar 8, 2011, 5:44 PM
Post #123 of 509 (5007 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

show me hard evidence that you were created by god.


Partner cracklover


Mar 8, 2011, 6:14 PM
Post #124 of 509 (4983 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
robx wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?

To me it's not about being perfect. Yes a few gnats die. And yeah, the bike tubes I have might possibly be lined with some small animal product. and the wires in computers have some insane animal product. But if I can do my best to abstain from killing or hurting animals then I'm happy.

and yes, I understand the negative impact that over farming causes, but it's hard to find alternatives, and to me it really is more about doing the best you can, not being perfect.

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


aprice00


Mar 8, 2011, 6:15 PM
Post #125 of 509 (4981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I've been nearly vegan for over a month now. I say 'nearly' because I am allowing myself to have the eggs from our local farm share. I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

Here are changes that I've noticed so far:

I need to drink more water.
I have more energy.
I feel more awake in general.
I am happier.
I can't drink as much beer.
My stomach aches are gone.

That being said, it wasn't a hard jump for me because the only animal based food that I had been eating before had been dairy.

I stopped eating meat and chicken 8 years ago. I found I was unable to digest it well.
Even when I would have good steak , I got a terribly nauseous.
Then I drove across the country and stopped in Nebraska, someone said do you know why our angus beef is so good? I said no. He said look at the cows, they are so happy we don't lock them up and they eat grass all day.
I stopped and looked at those cows, and indeed they looked happy, with their large brown eyes spending their days on the grass.
I tried to taste this angus beef, but I couldn't anymore. I felt for those cows, like the short story a "mothers tale".
However I continued to have fish, and eggs about once per week. Feeling concerned it would be difficult to have enough protein otherwise. I do drink organic hemp protein drinks.
Recently in the last month, I started to get sick to my stomach from eggs. Then I couldn't digest fish and also felt queasy.
So for now I'm not eating fish or eggs and dairy I rarely have.
Outside my window every morning their are little birds on the branches pecking and they look so happy and beautiful. How could I eat a bird.

Thanks for all the great comments.Smile

So anyone reach a conclusion ? I presume we would have to have many sets of identical twins and give them different diets and see which climbs better

So I was wondering has anyone read the blood type diet and feel that certain foods are better for the various blood types. A, B ,O , AB and their diet that goes along with that book?

I have an identical twin that has a very different diet then me and yes I climb harder. So it must be the diet.

j/k but realy thou the differences in us are vast even though we are from the same fertilized egg. For starters we are not the same height, we dont have the same body build, nor do we have the same interests. So if you had more of a "clone" and could somehow control the environmental effects on mental and physical developement you might be able to get comparible results.. but I still doubt it.
So here is the point, dont worry your pretty little head over this because with the vast amount of variables limiting a cimber, vegan/non-vegan is probably a very very small contributer.
More importantly
eat right (more fresh fruit/veg, less meat/processed foods)
eat less (maintain a lean body and healthy bmi)
and prepare yourself mentally (if being vegan makes you think you climb harder, by all means stay vegan).


Partner cracklover


Mar 8, 2011, 6:44 PM
Post #127 of 509 (5062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [milesenoell] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Gibbons rock! Here are a few youtube vids.

Check out this video of a gibbon brachiating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRJA8pZ8JCA

How 'bout the guns on this guy (and the grace!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acy--k7Qww0

How 'bout that double-dyno starting at 0:19 Holy crap!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLSVt9CWSpc

GO

Cool vids, definitely demonstrating power and agility but I'd argue that brachiating is a different item from climbing per se, since specialized shoulder anatomy is so critical to brachiation, and "holds" are plentiful and large.

Sure, they are the absolute masters of brachiation. But it's not just in the horizontal where they excel. They are insanely good at going up and down too.

They're way bigger than most monkeys, so that works against them, but even lacking a tail, within their realm, I think they'd outclimb many monkeys.

Anyway, the point isn't whether monkeys are better or apes are better. The point is that there are apes (the family shared with humans) who are superb climbers.

GO


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 8, 2011, 6:48 PM
Post #128 of 509 (5058 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
Are you serious? What, are you from Texas, or something?

Wait... You are.

There is plenty of hard evidence, but you will not understand it, since you do not care to understand it.

Do you know what the "Academies of Science" are?
http://www.anubih.ba/...APEvolution17nov.pdf

You should read the brief statement, and see all the National Academies of Science who signed it.


And, there is a similar statement made by clergy, of MANY different religious denominations:
http://blue.butler.edu/...rgy/ChrClergyLtr.htm

You should read that too... BUT, if you do, you will see that you are in a fringe minority of RNJ's who are [wilfully] ignorant of reality.

So, I do understand why you WILL not read either of those, as you just do not care to understand... It's much easier to deny reality when you ignore reality.

So, ummm, do you like, think the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, too? Angelic



Sorry for the thread drift, I know this isn't the SB.


(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 8, 2011, 6:53 PM)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 8, 2011, 6:49 PM
Post #129 of 509 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
saint_john wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

show me hard evidence that you were created by god.

Much like this PTFTW that will soon be hidden - we won't be able to see it, but I'll still know it's there.

Considering this should have been moved to the soapy land pages back, but due to greeny participation (that bordered on personal attacks), I think this is the perfect answer to the OP. I'm guessing the metaphor will be lost to most.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 8, 2011, 7:05 PM
Post #130 of 509 (5043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
Are you serious? What, are you from Texas, or something?

Wait... You are.

There is plenty of hard evidence, but you will not understand it, since you do not care to understand it.

Do you know what the "Academies of Science" are?
http://www.anubih.ba/...APEvolution17nov.pdf

You should read the brief statement, and see all the National Academies of Science who signed it.


And, there is a similar statement made by clergy, of MANY different religious denominations:
http://blue.butler.edu/...rgy/ChrClergyLtr.htm

You should read that too... BUT, if you do, you will see that you are in a fringe minority of RNJ's who are [wilfully] ignorant of reality.

So, I do understand why you WILL not read either of those, as you just do not care to understand... It's much easier to deny reality when you ignore reality.

So, ummm, do you like, think the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, too? Angelic



Sorry for the thread drift, I know this isn't the SB.


It will be, it will be.


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 7:24 PM
Post #131 of 509 (5033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Lbrombach] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Lbrombach wrote:
I could be talking out of my ass...but doesn't eating lean meat (part. red meat) increase testosterone level which should subsequently give a boost to strength/endurance/aggressiveness on the wall?

Not as far as I know.

Jay


aprice00


Mar 8, 2011, 7:54 PM
Post #132 of 509 (5019 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Hey bub you got the wrong tool for the job.

Evolution- A change in allel frequency over time.
Thats to say a population of people show more allels for blond hair than brown hair at Time=100 then they did at Time=0

Theory does not equal Hypothesis.
Examples of Theory
1 Atomic theory - That thing your climbing on is made of atoms as well as your hands chief.
2 Cell Theory - You and your crag dog are made up of cells, sport.
Example of Hypothesis
If I stop eating meat I will shred more gnars.

In order to take on Theory status it must by deffinition be backup by lots of "hard evidence"

Theory of Evolution- Tells more of How than Why.
Your confusing it with the Theory of Common Descent

Oh and BTW no where in Common Descent does it say that you came from an ape.


Partner camhead


Mar 8, 2011, 8:09 PM
Post #133 of 509 (5003 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
Are you serious? What, are you from Texas, or something?

Wait... You are.

There is plenty of hard evidence, but you will not understand it, since you do not care to understand it.

Do you know what the "Academies of Science" are?
http://www.anubih.ba/...APEvolution17nov.pdf

You should read the brief statement, and see all the National Academies of Science who signed it.


And, there is a similar statement made by clergy, of MANY different religious denominations:
http://blue.butler.edu/...rgy/ChrClergyLtr.htm

You should read that too... BUT, if you do, you will see that you are in a fringe minority of RNJ's who are [wilfully] ignorant of reality.

So, I do understand why you WILL not read either of those, as you just do not care to understand... It's much easier to deny reality when you ignore reality.

So, ummm, do you like, think the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, too? Angelic



Sorry for the thread drift, I know this isn't the SB.


It will be, it will be.

Heh, rrradam is drawn to topics like this like Nazgül to The Ring.


caughtinside


Mar 8, 2011, 8:10 PM
Post #134 of 509 (5001 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy
Are you serious? What, are you from Texas, or something?

Wait... You are.

There is plenty of hard evidence, but you will not understand it, since you do not care to understand it.

Do you know what the "Academies of Science" are?
http://www.anubih.ba/...APEvolution17nov.pdf

You should read the brief statement, and see all the National Academies of Science who signed it.


And, there is a similar statement made by clergy, of MANY different religious denominations:
http://blue.butler.edu/...rgy/ChrClergyLtr.htm

You should read that too... BUT, if you do, you will see that you are in a fringe minority of RNJ's who are [wilfully] ignorant of reality.

So, I do understand why you WILL not read either of those, as you just do not care to understand... It's much easier to deny reality when you ignore reality.

So, ummm, do you like, think the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, too? Angelic



Sorry for the thread drift, I know this isn't the SB.


It will be, it will be.

Heh, rrradam is drawn to topics like this like Nazgül to The Ring.

yes, sort of like you and spraying... he jist can't help himself.


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 8:14 PM
Post #135 of 509 (4989 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:
robx wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?

To me it's not about being perfect. Yes a few gnats die. And yeah, the bike tubes I have might possibly be lined with some small animal product. and the wires in computers have some insane animal product. But if I can do my best to abstain from killing or hurting animals then I'm happy.

and yes, I understand the negative impact that over farming causes, but it's hard to find alternatives, and to me it really is more about doing the best you can, not being perfect.

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO

nope, but see line i put in bold "if you feel that your happiness is more important than animas' live then that's fine".

that's a healthy dose of smugness


styndall


Mar 8, 2011, 8:16 PM
Post #136 of 509 (4987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.


gmggg


Mar 8, 2011, 8:29 PM
Post #137 of 509 (4975 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Gibbons rock! Here are a few youtube vids.

Check out this video of a gibbon brachiating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRJA8pZ8JCA

How 'bout the guns on this guy (and the grace!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acy--k7Qww0

How 'bout that double-dyno starting at 0:19 Holy crap!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLSVt9CWSpc

GO

Cool vids, definitely demonstrating power and agility but I'd argue that brachiating is a different item from climbing per se, since specialized shoulder anatomy is so critical to brachiation, and "holds" are plentiful and large.

Sure, they are the absolute masters of brachiation. But it's not just in the horizontal where they excel. They are insanely good at going up and down too.

They're way bigger than most monkeys, so that works against them, but even lacking a tail, within their realm, I think they'd outclimb many monkeys.

Anyway, the point isn't whether monkeys are better or apes are better. The point is that there are apes (the family shared with humans) who are superb climbers.

GO

You forgot to mention their fingers. And their thumbs. That's a really cool bit of adaptation.


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 8:33 PM
Post #138 of 509 (4965 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:

Oh and BTW no where in Common Descent does it say that you came from an ape.

Actually, we are apes.

Jay


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 8:42 PM
Post #139 of 509 (4954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [styndall] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.


csproul


Mar 8, 2011, 8:48 PM
Post #140 of 509 (4950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 8:49 PM
Post #141 of 509 (4950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [styndall] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

styndall wrote:
[T]he vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all.

Robx wrote, "If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me," which sounds snide and patronizing. I'm fairly confident from that statement that Robx is pretty certain about the superiority of his "moral calculus."

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 8, 2011, 8:51 PM)


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 8:51 PM
Post #142 of 509 (4947 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
styndall wrote:
[T]he vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all.

Robx wrote, "If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me," which sounds snide and patronizing. I'm fairly confident from that statement that Robx is pretty certain about the superiority of his "moral calculus."

Jay

thank you, i was wondering if anyone read that part of his post


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 8:53 PM
Post #143 of 509 (4943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [csproul] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada


csproul


Mar 8, 2011, 9:02 PM
Post #144 of 509 (4928 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
styndall wrote:
[T]he vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all.

Robx wrote, "If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me," which sounds snide and patronizing. I'm fairly confident from that statement that Robx is pretty certain about the superiority of his "moral calculus."

Jay
Why is it ok for you to read between the lines in Robx's post, but you jump all over other people when they do that to you? See my post above. Robx has made a choice that he/she doesn't need to eat animals, and that eating animals is a convenience that does not outweigh the value that he/she places on the lives of those animals. If you take Robx's post at face value (and I see no reason not to), he/she thinks it is fine if you don't hold the same values. Like I said above, I certainly don't hold the same values that Robx does, but I'll own up to it.


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 9:12 PM
Post #145 of 509 (4919 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 8, 2011, 9:14 PM
Post #146 of 509 (4911 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [styndall] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

I would point over to the sudsy box thread of "what do climbers think of me" as another example where peoples self identification clouds their judgment and perception of who is attacking and who reacting calmly. One of the reasons that moderation is different in the green threads is that it can be impossible to separate a personal attack from a strong attack on a deeply held belief. The stronger one identifies with their ideals, the tighter the link between personal insult and comment on the merit of an idea.

Take even in this thread well before ma piped in, WW felt that my leading questions were a disguised attack on her opinion of local, organic farming. Because even snarky question implies derision of ideals, we were off for many a post. Examples like this are why we politely move these topics to a section where it is no holds barred and why many of the same soapy players came to this thread.

This idea/person linkage is magnified because we don't see faces or really know the players. Take me and WW, if she had caught the reference in my first post to the book "Near a Thousand Tables" and knew that my wife writes articles for a local rag about local food and caught my bison reference (the hot new local meat), she might realize that I can talk about local foods because I'm involved in local foods. The problem is that I'm not a believer, and that cynicism come thru loud and clear. To a believer in something, cynicism of a faith is to disrespect the person.

To call yourself a vegetarian is to label yourself for others to know that you hold that idea so strongly that to criticize the idea is to criticize you.


csproul


Mar 8, 2011, 9:15 PM
Post #147 of 509 (4910 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada
I'm not sure what you're getting at, but the same thing could be said if you would not eat plants. If you don't need to eat plants to survive (not sure if that is true or not), then you could make the same argument about placing more value on your happiness than you place on the life of a plant. Eventually, if you want to live, you'll value survival over the life of some plant or animal. Beyond living a healthy life, your food choices constitute a choice to value convenience/happiness over whatever else you are consuming. Like I said before, I don't have any problem with this, I'm ok with the choices I make.


lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 8, 2011, 9:28 PM
Post #148 of 509 (4893 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
To call yourself a vegetarian is to label yourself for others to know that you hold that idea so strongly that to criticize the idea is to criticize you.

Well, don't paint every vegetarian with the same brush...


But overall, I would say that there is a trend: the more extreme someone's food choices (extreme used here as a deviation from the population mean, in any direction), the more likely it is that their entire lifestyle revolves around this choice, and the more likely it is that it is not just about food choice, it is also about morality, ethics, and self-identification.

With so many things tied togehter, attacking one part feels like an attack on the whole. Substitute food for religion, and it;s the same story, really...


wonderwoman


Mar 8, 2011, 9:33 PM
Post #149 of 509 (4889 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

I would point over to the sudsy box thread of "what do climbers think of me" as another example where peoples self identification clouds their judgment and perception of who is attacking and who reacting calmly. One of the reasons that moderation is different in the green threads is that it can be impossible to separate a personal attack from a strong attack on a deeply held belief. The stronger one identifies with their ideals, the tighter the link between personal insult and comment on the merit of an idea.

Take even in this thread well before ma piped in, WW felt that my leading questions were a disguised attack on her opinion of local, organic farming. Because even snarky question implies derision of ideals, we were off for many a post. Examples like this are why we politely move these topics to a section where it is no holds barred and why many of the same soapy players came to this thread.

This idea/person linkage is magnified because we don't see faces or really know the players. Take me and WW, if she had caught the reference in my first post to the book "Near a Thousand Tables" and knew that my wife writes articles for a local rag about local food and caught my bison reference (the hot new local meat), she might realize that I can talk about local foods because I'm involved in local foods. The problem is that I'm not a believer, and that cynicism come thru loud and clear. To a believer in something, cynicism of a faith is to disrespect the person.

To call yourself a vegetarian is to label yourself for others to know that you hold that idea so strongly that to criticize the idea is to criticize you.

Actually, I do know all that about you. Check your sent PMs. You & I have had this conversation many times. You sent me the link to your wife's blog & i recall one of her entries was about high fructose corn syrup being no different sugar, with no nutitonal science to back it up. So, I am sorry if you took offense to me accusing you of being pro - big food industry. But it seems to me that you are, which is why I asked. I didn't mean to offend you but was basing it on our conversation history.


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 8, 2011, 9:39 PM
Post #150 of 509 (4886 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
To call yourself a vegetarian is to label yourself for others to know that you hold that idea so strongly that to criticize the idea is to criticize you.

Well, don't paint every vegetarian with the same brush...


But overall, I would say that there is a trend: the more extreme someone's food choices (extreme used here as a deviation from the population mean, in any direction), the more likely it is that their entire lifestyle revolves around this choice, and the more likely it is that it is not just about food choice, it is also about morality, ethics, and self-identification.

With so many things tied togehter, attacking one part feels like an attack on the whole. Substitute food for religion, and it;s the same story, really...
Wow... Well put.


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 9:43 PM
Post #151 of 509 (5771 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.


saint_john


Mar 8, 2011, 9:52 PM
Post #152 of 509 (5760 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Well, don't paint every vegetarian with the same brush...


But overall, I would say that there is a trend: the more extreme someone's food choices (extreme used here as a deviation from the population mean, in any direction), the more likely it is that their entire lifestyle revolves around this choice, and the more likely it is that it is not just about food choice, it is also about morality, ethics, and self-identification.

With so many things tied togehter, attacking one part feels like an attack on the whole. Substitute food for religion, and it;s the same story, really...

very well put.


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 8, 2011, 9:54 PM
Post #153 of 509 (5755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Holy Butthurtz Batman. And y'all make fun of us in the BET for wasting our time.


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 8, 2011, 9:57 PM
Post #154 of 509 (5751 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?


gmggg


Mar 8, 2011, 9:58 PM
Post #155 of 509 (5747 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?

I was just about to write that...


Partner macherry


Mar 8, 2011, 10:00 PM
Post #156 of 509 (5744 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?

yes and poverty and other social issues. the adaptation of a western diet has caused the cases of diabetes in the aboriginal population to go through the roof


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 8, 2011, 10:02 PM
Post #157 of 509 (5742 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That makes sense.


jt512


Mar 8, 2011, 10:37 PM
Post #158 of 509 (5718 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?

Yeah, and cigarette smoking, diet, and substandard access to health care.

Jay


Partner camhead


Mar 8, 2011, 11:13 PM
Post #159 of 509 (5696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?

Yeah, and cigarette smoking, diet, and substandard access to health care.

Jay

Though I would not be surprised if the average lifespans of Inuit adults before contact was significantly lower than those of hunter-gatherers with more diverse diets in more temperate areas.


furgie


Mar 9, 2011, 12:47 AM
Post #160 of 509 (5671 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 29

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...


furgie


Mar 9, 2011, 12:50 AM
Post #161 of 509 (5667 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 29

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Texas FTW!

oh yur jus jellus that we got hueco...Tongue


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 9, 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #162 of 509 (5663 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...

Seriously, that whole seceding from the Union thing, I support it.


dr_feelgood


Mar 9, 2011, 12:54 AM
Post #163 of 509 (5661 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
csproul wrote:
macherry wrote:
styndall wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO


I was going to say much the same thing as cracklover, and it's an important and interesting point.

There's a lot of reactionary stuff in this thread, and on the internet at large, calling vegetarians and vegans sanctimonious and holier-than-thou, even when, like in the case of the guy Macherry is rudely attacking, the vegetarian even goes out of his way to state that his moral calculus doesn't necessarily apply to anyone else at all. The resistance to the idea that there could be ethics involved in food choices is massive, and the backlash against such ethical consideration is unnecessarily vicious.

See also - irrational hate for PETA. They do silly stuff that draws attention to some kinds of animal cruelty, and people treat them more or less like neo-nazis. The attacks are out of proportion to any reasonable offense people could have to people in underwear hanging out in cages near city hall.

once again, i'll state that it's lines like, (which i quoted in my response)

"If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me."

i take issue with this kind of attitude.
But isn't that kind of true?You do not need meat. It is not necessary to your survival. It is somewhat of a convenience that makes us happy. If you eat it, you are making a statement that your happiness is more important than the lives of the animals that you eat. Nothing wrong with that in my book. I'll own up to it.

well, you don't need plants either. not necessary for my survival. ask the aboriginal people of northern canada

You mean the people who diie 12 years younger, on average, than other Canadians?

Jay

i was speaking more historically. a traditional inuit diet was animal based. not so much these days.

Think C2H5OH may play a part in that?

Yeah, and cigarette smoking, diet, and substandard access to health care.

Jay

Though I would not be surprised if the average lifespans of Inuit adults before contact was significantly lower than those of hunter-gatherers with more diverse diets in more temperate areas.

Pimpin' ain't easy...


dr_feelgood


Mar 9, 2011, 12:58 AM
Post #164 of 509 (5659 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...

Seriously, that whole seceding from the Union thing, I support it.


http://www.texassecede.org

Viva la revolucion!


marc801


Mar 9, 2011, 12:59 AM
Post #165 of 509 (5658 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
...so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community.
This is so shockingly, blatantly wrong. You must be reading only Texas approved text books.


atg200


Mar 9, 2011, 1:06 AM
Post #166 of 509 (5654 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Post deleted by atg200 [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


hafilax


Mar 9, 2011, 1:06 AM
Post #167 of 509 (5654 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
furgie wrote:
...so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community.
This is so shockingly, blatantly wrong. You must be reading only Texas approved text books.
Trollin trollin trollin
keep those doggies trollin
'though the tubes are swollen
rawhide


jt512


Mar 9, 2011, 1:33 AM
Post #168 of 509 (5644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...



Yes, there we are (US). Second-to-last in public acceptance of evolution, just ahead of Turkey.

Jay


enigma


Mar 9, 2011, 3:11 AM
Post #169 of 509 (5611 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
I stopped eating meat and chicken 8 years ago. I found I was unable to digest it well.
Even when I would have good steak , I got a terribly nauseous.
Then I drove across the country and stopped in Nebraska, someone said do you know why our angus beef is so good? I said no. He said look at the cows, they are so happy we don't lock them up and they eat grass all day.
I stopped and looked at those cows, and indeed they looked happy, with their large brown eyes spending their days on the grass.
I tried to taste this angus beef, but I couldn't anymore. I felt for those cows, like the short story a "mothers tale".
However I continued to have fish, and eggs about once per week. Feeling concerned it would be difficult to have enough protein otherwise. I do drink organic hemp protein drinks.
Recently in the last month, I started to get sick to my stomach from eggs. Then I couldn't digest fish and also felt queasy.
So for now I'm not eating fish or eggs and dairy I rarely have.
Outside my window every morning their are little birds on the branches pecking and they look so happy and beautiful. How could I eat a bird.

Thanks for all the great comments.Smile

So anyone reach a conclusion ? I presume we would have to have many sets of identical twins and give them different diets and see which climbs better

So I was wondering has anyone read the blood type diet and feel that certain foods are better for the various blood types. A, B ,O , AB and their diet that goes along with that book?

You really need to see a doctor. Seriously. What you're describing can be indicative of a number of fairly serious problems. I suggest that you contact your primary physician soon and arrange to be examined by a gastroenterologist

After he or she is able to determine and treat any physiologic causes, then you can go to the clinical psychologist you so desperately need.

Please refrain from personal attack and stay on this topic
. I know you are trying to provoke me. If you can't be a good boy then find a different thread. Wink


Partner cracklover


Mar 9, 2011, 3:43 AM
Post #170 of 509 (5601 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:
robx wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Since you're taking the moral high ground, I suspect you are fully aware that the industrial monoculture crop fields that you are reliant upon has done a hum-dinger on the ecology that the animals you're trying to protect rely upon. Similarly, I am sure you are aware that habitat disruption from crop agriculture is a major cause of animal suffering and population declines. Since you're keenly aware of these things, I am also sure that all of your vegetables come from a home garden where not a single gnat is harmed. Or are only sentient animals bad to kill on your moral hilltop?

To me it's not about being perfect. Yes a few gnats die. And yeah, the bike tubes I have might possibly be lined with some small animal product. and the wires in computers have some insane animal product. But if I can do my best to abstain from killing or hurting animals then I'm happy.

and yes, I understand the negative impact that over farming causes, but it's hard to find alternatives, and to me it really is more about doing the best you can, not being perfect.

great, you're not perfect, thanks. so drop the holier than thou, i am vegetarianand i'm saving the world act.

i have nothing against vegans and vegetarians, hell my daughter's a vegan, but there's nothing worse that a vegetarian that spurts the i'm not eating animals, so i can ride my high horse through the streets. you do nothing for the cause.............see PETA

Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? Dude is doing what he thinks is right, it's not affecting you, he's *not* taking a holier than you approach, and he's living by his principles. Principles that, while not mine, I certainly see nothing wrong with. Hit a nerve or something?

GO

nope, but see line i put in bold "if you feel that your happiness is more important than animas' live then that's fine".

that's a healthy dose of smugness

Actually, that's where I differ with you (and Jay). I eat animals, and I don't feel talked down to at all by robx. I quite agree with his point that (IMO) my happiness is more important than the life of the animals I eat. Otherwise I wouldn't eat them.

Further, I think that it's reasonable for robx to point out that fact. Food *is* an ethical issue, why shrink away from the fact? We should take responsibility for the fact that the meat we eat doesn't just come from those shrink-wrapped grocery store packages. If you don't have the stomach to face the fact that you're responsible for the slaughter of animals for your food, you shouldn't eat them.

Let's look at this from another perspective: Let's say there's a restaurant near you, it's convenient, the food is decent and cheap. You like it. But you learn that the owners are doing shit you really don't like. Nothing illegal, but definitely really fucked up. Would you picket the place? Would you try to get it shut down? Probably not. I wouldn't. But I'd stop eating there, and if anyone asked me about it, I'd be honest with them.

That's exactly what robx is doing. He thinks killing other animals for food is pretty messed up, so he doesn't do it. That's cool with me!

GO


theguy


Mar 9, 2011, 4:58 AM
Post #171 of 509 (5588 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? ...Hit a nerve or something?

Probably:

macherry wrote:
hell my daughter's a vegan


Must be pretty galling to feel the (perhaps silent) reproach of your own child at every meal, and then, on turning to your sanctum, your place of greenness, be confronted with more of the same.


marc801


Mar 9, 2011, 6:06 AM
Post #172 of 509 (5574 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [theguy] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

theguy wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? ...Hit a nerve or something?

Probably:

macherry wrote:
hell my daughter's a vegan


Must be pretty galling to feel the (perhaps silent) reproach of your own child at every meal, and then, on turning to your sanctum, your place of greenness, be confronted with more of the same.
If that's really the case, she should just eat her daughter. That's what we did.


marc801


Mar 9, 2011, 6:11 AM
Post #173 of 509 (5570 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
I stopped eating meat and chicken 8 years ago. I found I was unable to digest it well.
Even when I would have good steak , I got a terribly nauseous.
Then I drove across the country and stopped in Nebraska, someone said do you know why our angus beef is so good? I said no. He said look at the cows, they are so happy we don't lock them up and they eat grass all day.
I stopped and looked at those cows, and indeed they looked happy, with their large brown eyes spending their days on the grass.
I tried to taste this angus beef, but I couldn't anymore. I felt for those cows, like the short story a "mothers tale".
However I continued to have fish, and eggs about once per week. Feeling concerned it would be difficult to have enough protein otherwise. I do drink organic hemp protein drinks.
Recently in the last month, I started to get sick to my stomach from eggs. Then I couldn't digest fish and also felt queasy.
So for now I'm not eating fish or eggs and dairy I rarely have.
Outside my window every morning their are little birds on the branches pecking and they look so happy and beautiful. How could I eat a bird.

Thanks for all the great comments.Smile

So anyone reach a conclusion ? I presume we would have to have many sets of identical twins and give them different diets and see which climbs better

So I was wondering has anyone read the blood type diet and feel that certain foods are better for the various blood types. A, B ,O , AB and their diet that goes along with that book?

You really need to see a doctor. Seriously. What you're describing can be indicative of a number of fairly serious problems. I suggest that you contact your primary physician soon and arrange to be examined by a gastroenterologist

After he or she is able to determine and treat any physiologic causes, then you can go to the clinical psychologist you so desperately need.

Please refrain from personal attack and stay on this topic
. I know you are trying to provoke me. If you can't be a good boy then find a different thread. Wink

That's not a personal attack. Based on your posts, it's a serious bit of advice.


enigma


Mar 9, 2011, 7:24 AM
Post #174 of 509 (5558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
theguy wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? ...Hit a nerve or something?

Probably:

macherry wrote:
hell my daughter's a vegan


Must be pretty galling to feel the (perhaps silent) reproach of your own child at every meal, and then, on turning to your sanctum, your place of greenness, be confronted with more of the same.
If that's really the case, she should just eat her daughter. That's what we did.

You are Crazy


enigma


Mar 9, 2011, 7:33 AM
Post #175 of 509 (5840 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Well, don't paint every vegetarian with the same brush...


But overall, I would say that there is a trend: the more extreme someone's food choices (extreme used here as a deviation from the population mean, in any direction), the more likely it is that their entire lifestyle revolves around this choice, and the more likely it is that it is not just about food choice, it is also about morality, ethics, and self-identification.

With so many things tied togehter, attacking one part feels like an attack on the whole. Substitute food for religion, and it;s the same story, really...

very well put.

I believe if you want to eat meat, chicken, fish, its a personal decision.
I was trying to find out if climbers who are vegan or vegetarian feel their diet without meat effects their performance climbing.
However there are studies that meat has alot of hormones, antibotics and in general unhealthy.
So is it worth it? There is also a moral issue, if you can sit down and eat meat and feel nothing for the slaughter that has taken place on a animal.


enigma


Mar 9, 2011, 8:59 AM
Post #176 of 509 (5643 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
justroberto wrote:
jt512 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
You still think "carbs" make you fat, which is untrue
I've never said that; nor do I believe it. You've only insinuated that I belive it.

In reply to:
you still think that in order to get sufficient protein on a vegan diet you have to consume "a ton of carbs," which is untrue
Other than nuts and soy based products. what sources of protein are vegan and do not also have carbs?

None come to mind, but why are you so preoccupied with "carbs" in the first place?

Jay

Honest question:

Do you see any particular proscriptive diet (that is, vegetarian, vegan, etc) as being more conducive to meeting your recommended fat/carb/protein proportions for weight loss for climbers?

It's easiest if you include lean animal products in your diet, but you could do it on a veg*n diet by relying on fat-free soy products.

Jay

Beans have protein, you can have fat-free as well.

I do think there is some quality fish if its wild and from an area like Alaska or Canada.
I going back to eating fish, the problem is alot of places have farm raised in California, and I like sashimi. Or they have fish from Vietnam.
In the east coast the fish was better quality. I don't understand why California can't get wild fish from Hawaii.

I don't like tofu much and recently I've heard a study where there's a correlation between too much soy and breast cancer.
Furthermore, I was totally exhausted from riding a bike for a couple of hours yesterday.
Generally I have more endurance and recovery the next day.
I just don't think I'm getting enough protein.
Of course that's not vegetarian.

Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?
I feel bad for cows and birds, somehow I don't think fish feel pain.

The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

Any helpful information regarding these topics are appreciated . thanks


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 9, 2011, 12:00 PM)


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 9, 2011, 12:05 PM
Post #177 of 509 (5630 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community.
Wow... You must 'teach' in Texas.

Care to pop over to the SB and share some of this 'virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community' that you speak of? We would love to see it.


Jnclk


Mar 9, 2011, 12:42 PM
Post #178 of 509 (5621 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2007
Posts: 89

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Beans have protein, you can have fat-free as well.

I do think there is some quality fish if its wild and from an area like Alaska or Canada.
I going back to eating fish, the problem is alot of places have farm raised in California, and I like sashimi. Or they have fish from Vietnam.
In the east coast the fish was better quality. I don't understand why California can't get wild fish from Hawaii.

I don't like tofu much and recently I've heard a study where there's a correlation between too much soy and breast cancer.
Furthermore, I was totally exhausted from riding a bike for a couple of hours yesterday.
Generally I have more endurance and recovery the next day.
I just don't think I'm getting enough protein.
Of course that's not vegetarian.

Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?
I feel bad for cows and birds, somehow I don't think fish feel pain.

The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

Any helpful information regarding these topics are appreciated . thanks

I think you have numerous misconceptions about nutrition. You can get sufficient protein from a plant based diet. There are complete proteins in the plant world. Protein is one aspect of a healthy diet. The importance of protein tends to be over emphasized.

On the veagn athlete front, some great info can be found in Brendan Brazier's "The Thrive Diet". He's a professional ironman triathelete who is also vegan. I'd wager to say that he is fitter than the vast majority of people here.


(This post was edited by Jnclk on Mar 9, 2011, 1:52 PM)


Partner camhead


Mar 9, 2011, 1:27 PM
Post #179 of 509 (5617 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [furgie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

furgie wrote:
gmggg wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Texas FTW!

oh yur jus jellus that we got hueco...Tongue

Hueco is not in Texas. Try to keep up, please.


saint_john


Mar 9, 2011, 1:47 PM
Post #180 of 509 (5611 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [Jnclk] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
On the veagn athelete front, some great info can be found in Brendan Brazier's "The Thrive Diet". He's a professional ironman triathelete who is also vegan. I'd wager to say that he is fitter than the vast majority of people here.

thanks for posting that, I'll have to check it out.
Here's a good article on Mac Danzig's (vegan MMA fighter) diet. http://www.mikemahler.com/articles/macdanzig.html


aprice00


Mar 9, 2011, 2:10 PM
Post #181 of 509 (5595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stop bumping this nonsensical thread or I will send in Kartessa to kill it...


Partner macherry


Mar 9, 2011, 3:06 PM
Post #182 of 509 (5575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [theguy] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

theguy wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Jesus, Ma, what was that all about? ...Hit a nerve or something?

Probably:

macherry wrote:
hell my daughter's a vegan


Must be pretty galling to feel the (perhaps silent) reproach of your own child at every meal, and then, on turning to your sanctum, your place of greenness, be confronted with more of the same.

no, i actually cook vegan meals 4-5 times a week. i don't eat a lot of meat or dairy. and my daughter is away at college


dr_feelgood


Mar 9, 2011, 3:33 PM
Post #183 of 509 (5561 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [atg200] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

atg200 wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...

Seriously, that whole seceding from the Union thing, I support it.


http://www.texassecede.org

Viva la revolucion!

We should just do a straight up trade with Mexico - Texas for Baja.

I'm not going to inflict anything like a horde of overweight, ignorant, repressive texans on poor mexico...


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 9, 2011, 3:56 PM
Post #184 of 509 (5545 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
atg200 wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...

Seriously, that whole seceding from the Union thing, I support it.


http://www.texassecede.org

Viva la revolucion!

We should just do a straight up trade with Mexico - Texas for Baja.

I'm not going to inflict anything like a horde of overweight, ignorant, repressive texans on poor mexico...

Fine, we'll sweeten the deal. We'll throw in NM, but they'll need to take AZ as well. But that means we'll want the Yucatan, and turning a blind eye to the annexation of Cuba, and a contract for cheap gulf oil that we can have at below market rate but still be able to react with surprise when the next spill happens.

And Canada, have you thought of what adding the Dakotas could do for you? You know BC would work really well for us with WA and OR.


blueeyedclimber


Mar 9, 2011, 4:07 PM
Post #185 of 509 (5538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You know a thread belongs in community when dr_feelgood and Toast are main contributors. Tongue

Josh


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 9, 2011, 4:15 PM
Post #186 of 509 (5530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
You know a thread belongs in community when dr_feelgood and Toast are main contributors. Tongue

Josh

I thought that was how the determination was made to move it. A search based on either of our id's and flick, to the scummunity it goes.

More remarkable is that no one made the note about the OP's missed parallelism and made the near obligatory "the animals I eat are vegetarian" joke.


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 9, 2011, 5:14 PM
Post #187 of 509 (5500 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
furgie wrote:
gmggg wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Texas FTW!

oh yur jus jellus that we got hueco...Tongue

Hueco is not in Texas. Try to keep up, please.

Pssst... Paul... It's just outside of El Paso. Wink


dr_feelgood


Mar 9, 2011, 6:17 PM
Post #188 of 509 (5472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
You know a thread belongs in community when dr_feelgood and Toast are main contributors. Tongue

Josh


That's funny. Your post is number 186. Prior to it, I posted three times. A bit of really simple math shows that I contributed less than 2% of the total amount of posts. I think Tiff has more posts on several pages than I did prior to this one.

Just because I get bored by the redundant threads in the general forums does not make me a harbinger of thread movement.


jt512


Mar 9, 2011, 6:27 PM
Post #189 of 509 (5467 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay


hafilax


Mar 9, 2011, 6:54 PM
Post #190 of 509 (5452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy. I can understand the no wheat and no dairy aspects especially given the number of people who are especially sensitive to them.

Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans? I haven't been able to find an honest discussion and all the Paleo diet propaganda kind of gloss over the point.


jt512


Mar 9, 2011, 7:30 PM
Post #191 of 509 (5430 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy.

I can't assess the diet because just telling me what's not in it isn't enough. I'd have to know at least semi-quantitatively what the composition of the diet is. My guess, though, is that it would be too high in red meat to be taken seriously, given the body of literature of the effect of saturated fat on heart disease risk, and, with no dairy, way too low in calcium. The diet sounds like a recipe for osteoporosis.

I don't see any reason that the average person should not eat whole grains, legumes, and low-fat dairy products. Objects to these foods are largely made up.

In reply to:
Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans?

There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter, and the Paleo diet is no exception. Assuming your conclusion, and then cherry picking the literature for studies that superficially seem to support it is not doing science. There is no support for the existence of a nutritionally significant antinutrient effect of legumes, to the best of my knowledge.

What proportion of Paleo dieters are women, I wonder. I only hear guys talk about it. I wonder to what extent it's just an excuse to go hunting.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 9, 2011, 7:31 PM)


spikeddem


Mar 9, 2011, 7:39 PM
Post #192 of 509 (5421 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter

Haha, nice.


blueeyedclimber


Mar 9, 2011, 7:59 PM
Post #193 of 509 (5405 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
You know a thread belongs in community when dr_feelgood and Toast are main contributors. Tongue

Josh


That's funny. Your post is number 186. Prior to it, I posted three times. A bit of really simple math shows that I contributed less than 2% of the total amount of posts. I think Tiff has more posts on several pages than I did prior to this one.

Just because I get bored by the redundant threads in the general forums does not make me a harbinger of thread movement.


Hehe. I think you missed my point. Tiff was a contributor but when the thread went south and became more of a soapbox topic with some nutty Texan and the vegs vs. meateaters debate, only then were you and Toast lured in.

I just rarely see you in General, even on the rare occasion that we have an interesting topic (yes, it does happen from time to time).
Tongue

Josh


hafilax


Mar 9, 2011, 8:21 PM
Post #194 of 509 (5388 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy.

I can't assess the diet because just telling me what's not in it isn't enough. I'd have to know at least semi-quantitatively what the composition of the diet is. My guess, though, is that it would be too high in red meat to be taken seriously, given the body of literature of the effect of saturated fat on heart disease risk, and, with no dairy, way too low in calcium. The diet sounds like a recipe for osteoporosis.

I don't see any reason that the average person should not eat whole grains, legumes, and low-fat dairy products. Objects to these foods are largely made up.

In reply to:
Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans?

There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter, and the Paleo diet is no exception. Assuming your conclusion, and then cherry picking the literature for studies that superficially seem to support it is not doing science. There is no support for the existence of a nutritionally significant antinutrient effect of legumes, to the best of my knowledge.

What proportion of Paleo dieters are women, I wonder. I only hear guys talk about it. I wonder to what extent it's just an excuse to go hunting.

Jay
I assumed you would have known about it. If you do want to read the summary it's here:
Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century

The diet is generally something around 20:50:30 carbs:fat:protein by energy based on evolutionary and anthropological arguments assuming that the Paleolithic man ate a diet appropriate to our bodies. Saturated fat accounts for about 25% of the total calories. It's basically a low carb diet. Vegetables and fruit are also emphasized and make up the bulk of the volume eaten even though they don't contribute much to the total energy. A lot of Paleo diet people miss this point.

There have been a number of studies that have shown huge improvements in a broad range of health indicators by going to this diet. Dietary saturated fat is definitely correlated with heart disease and certainly a part of the equation but saturated fat alone is not a direct cause of heart disease AFAIK.

As for calcium, the claim is that eating enough fruit and veggies is sufficient for maintaining the proper balance.

My feeling is that it forces people to eliminate grains and sugars from their diet which cause a lot of problems in excess and the general population seems incapable of controlling the intake of these. It also appears that the gluten sensitivity is more widespread than originally thought. Similarly a lot of people are sensitive to dairy depending on their ancestry so cutting that out makes sense for those individuals. I'm not really sold on the legume argument, as I said.

I tried the diet and didn't like it so I'm back to eating grains, dairy and legumes but in lower quantities. More of a compromise that strict adherence which I think is excessive not to mention boring.

Like I said, I figured you would have had a cursory look at it before and could give a quick answer. No need to waste time on the question.


jt512


Mar 9, 2011, 8:30 PM
Post #195 of 509 (5380 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy.

I can't assess the diet because just telling me what's not in it isn't enough. I'd have to know at least semi-quantitatively what the composition of the diet is. My guess, though, is that it would be too high in red meat to be taken seriously, given the body of literature of the effect of saturated fat on heart disease risk, and, with no dairy, way too low in calcium. The diet sounds like a recipe for osteoporosis.

I don't see any reason that the average person should not eat whole grains, legumes, and low-fat dairy products. Objects to these foods are largely made up.

In reply to:
Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans?

There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter, and the Paleo diet is no exception. Assuming your conclusion, and then cherry picking the literature for studies that superficially seem to support it is not doing science. There is no support for the existence of a nutritionally significant antinutrient effect of legumes, to the best of my knowledge.

What proportion of Paleo dieters are women, I wonder. I only hear guys talk about it. I wonder to what extent it's just an excuse to go hunting.

Jay
I assumed you would have known about it. If you do want to read the summary it's here:
Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century

The diet is generally something around 20:50:30 carbs:fat:protein by energy based on evolutionary and anthropological arguments assuming that the Paleolithic man ate a diet appropriate to our bodies. Saturated fat accounts for about 25% of the total calories. It's basically a low carb diet. Vegetables and fruit are also emphasized and make up the bulk of the volume eaten even though they don't contribute much to the total energy. A lot of Paleo diet people miss this point.

There have been a number of studies that have shown huge improvements in a broad range of health indicators by going to this diet. Dietary saturated fat is definitely correlated with heart disease and certainly a part of the equation but saturated fat alone is not a direct cause of heart disease AFAIK.

As for calcium, the claim is that eating enough fruit and veggies is sufficient for maintaining the proper balance.

My feeling is that it forces people to eliminate grains and sugars from their diet which cause a lot of problems in excess and the general population seems incapable of controlling the intake of these. It also appears that the gluten sensitivity is more widespread than originally thought. Similarly a lot of people are sensitive to dairy depending on their ancestry so cutting that out makes sense for those individuals. I'm not really sold on the legume argument, as I said.

I tried the diet and didn't like it so I'm back to eating grains, dairy and legumes but in lower quantities. More of a compromise that strict adherence which I think is excessive not to mention boring.

Like I said, I figured you would have had a cursory look at it before and could give a quick answer. No need to waste time on the question.

My answer stands. It's too high in animal products, too low in calcium, and two high in saturated. It's a recipe for osteoporosis, even though they claim otherwise. It's not scientifically based, even though they claim it is.

And, yes, dietary saturated intake is causal in heart disease by increasing blood LDL-cholesterol; it's not just a correlation, no matter what the Paleo people tell you. I know they have elaborate rationalizations for it, among my favorite being why the proven-beyond-a-doubt heart-disesase-preventive effects of cholesterol-lowering medications are not due to cholesterol lowering.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 10, 2011, 6:49 AM)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 9, 2011, 9:07 PM
Post #196 of 509 (5361 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy.

I can't assess the diet because just telling me what's not in it isn't enough. I'd have to know at least semi-quantitatively what the composition of the diet is. My guess, though, is that it would be too high in red meat to be taken seriously, given the body of literature of the effect of saturated fat on heart disease risk, and, with no dairy, way too low in calcium. The diet sounds like a recipe for osteoporosis.

I don't see any reason that the average person should not eat whole grains, legumes, and low-fat dairy products. Objects to these foods are largely made up.

In reply to:
Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans?

There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter, and the Paleo diet is no exception. Assuming your conclusion, and then cherry picking the literature for studies that superficially seem to support it is not doing science. There is no support for the existence of a nutritionally significant antinutrient effect of legumes, to the best of my knowledge.

What proportion of Paleo dieters are women, I wonder. I only hear guys talk about it. I wonder to what extent it's just an excuse to go hunting.

Jay
I assumed you would have known about it. If you do want to read the summary it's here:
Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century

The diet is generally something around 20:50:30 carbs:fat:protein by energy based on evolutionary and anthropological arguments assuming that the Paleolithic man ate a diet appropriate to our bodies. Saturated fat accounts for about 25% of the total calories. It's basically a low carb diet. Vegetables and fruit are also emphasized and make up the bulk of the volume eaten even though they don't contribute much to the total energy. A lot of Paleo diet people miss this point.

There have been a number of studies that have shown huge improvements in a broad range of health indicators by going to this diet. Dietary saturated fat is definitely correlated with heart disease and certainly a part of the equation but saturated fat alone is not a direct cause of heart disease AFAIK.

As for calcium, the claim is that eating enough fruit and veggies is sufficient for maintaining the proper balance.

My feeling is that it forces people to eliminate grains and sugars from their diet which cause a lot of problems in excess and the general population seems incapable of controlling the intake of these. It also appears that the gluten sensitivity is more widespread than originally thought. Similarly a lot of people are sensitive to dairy depending on their ancestry so cutting that out makes sense for those individuals. I'm not really sold on the legume argument, as I said.

I tried the diet and didn't like it so I'm back to eating grains, dairy and legumes but in lower quantities. More of a compromise that strict adherence which I think is excessive not to mention boring.

Like I said, I figured you would have had a cursory look at it before and could give a quick answer. No need to waste time on the question.

Some science in the historic diet: http://www.nature.com/...l/news.2010.549.html


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 9, 2011, 9:55 PM
Post #197 of 509 (5347 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay
I've been wanting to ask you about your opinion on the Cordain style Paleo diet which boils down to no grains, no legumes and no dairy.

I can't assess the diet because just telling me what's not in it isn't enough. I'd have to know at least semi-quantitatively what the composition of the diet is. My guess, though, is that it would be too high in red meat to be taken seriously, given the body of literature of the effect of saturated fat on heart disease risk, and, with no dairy, way too low in calcium. The diet sounds like a recipe for osteoporosis.

I don't see any reason that the average person should not eat whole grains, legumes, and low-fat dairy products. Objects to these foods are largely made up.

In reply to:
Seems like some solid science behind it which calls into question the bean based diet that is necessary for veg*ns. How large is the anti-nutrient effect of beans?

There is generally no science behind any diet that starts with a capital letter, and the Paleo diet is no exception. Assuming your conclusion, and then cherry picking the literature for studies that superficially seem to support it is not doing science. There is no support for the existence of a nutritionally significant antinutrient effect of legumes, to the best of my knowledge.

What proportion of Paleo dieters are women, I wonder. I only hear guys talk about it. I wonder to what extent it's just an excuse to go hunting.

Jay
I assumed you would have known about it. If you do want to read the summary it's here:
Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century

The diet is generally something around 20:50:30 carbs:fat:protein by energy based on evolutionary and anthropological arguments assuming that the Paleolithic man ate a diet appropriate to our bodies. Saturated fat accounts for about 25% of the total calories. It's basically a low carb diet. Vegetables and fruit are also emphasized and make up the bulk of the volume eaten even though they don't contribute much to the total energy. A lot of Paleo diet people miss this point.

There have been a number of studies that have shown huge improvements in a broad range of health indicators by going to this diet. Dietary saturated fat is definitely correlated with heart disease and certainly a part of the equation but saturated fat alone is not a direct cause of heart disease AFAIK.

As for calcium, the claim is that eating enough fruit and veggies is sufficient for maintaining the proper balance.

My feeling is that it forces people to eliminate grains and sugars from their diet which cause a lot of problems in excess and the general population seems incapable of controlling the intake of these. It also appears that the gluten sensitivity is more widespread than originally thought. Similarly a lot of people are sensitive to dairy depending on their ancestry so cutting that out makes sense for those individuals. I'm not really sold on the legume argument, as I said.

I tried the diet and didn't like it so I'm back to eating grains, dairy and legumes but in lower quantities. More of a compromise that strict adherence which I think is excessive not to mention boring.

Like I said, I figured you would have had a cursory look at it before and could give a quick answer. No need to waste time on the question.

Some science in the historic diet: http://www.nature.com/...l/news.2010.549.html

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.


Partner happiegrrrl


Mar 9, 2011, 11:20 PM
Post #198 of 509 (5308 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
camhead wrote:
furgie wrote:
gmggg wrote:
furgie wrote:
bah just more evoligion (evolution religion) show me some hard evidence that I came from apes istead of forcing your unproven theories down my throat...Crazy

Texas FTW!

oh yur jus jellus that we got hueco...Tongue

Hueco is not in Texas. Try to keep up, please.

Pssst... Paul... It's just outside of El Paso. Wink


I heard hueco seceded from Texas....


Partner camhead


Mar 9, 2011, 11:37 PM
Post #199 of 509 (5302 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.

Not necessarily true, though yes, technically most humans in the first world are living longer today than ever before in the species' existence.

But, based on paleontological evidence, average age for hunter-gatherer males from around 100,000-10,000 years ago was in the late 60s, height was around 5'10". However, average age for men from about 10,000-100 years ago was around 40. Agriculture, and the accompanying disease, class stratifications, etc., was actually a bad thing for our species in a lot of ways.

Check out Diamond's "The Third Chimpanzee" for more details.


hafilax


Mar 9, 2011, 11:49 PM
Post #200 of 509 (5538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

The most interesting trend associated with the advent of agriculture that I've turned up is the fact that our average brain size has been steadily shrinking, at least until very recently.


johnwesely


Mar 10, 2011, 2:30 AM
Post #201 of 509 (4151 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.


enigma


Mar 10, 2011, 2:32 AM
Post #202 of 509 (4149 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

What about drug companies such as Genetech, Amgen and Centecor ? They thrive on people with cancer and heart disease, whether its from meat, microwaves, saturated fat, or genetic.
The drug industry wants people to remain dependent on their medicine , not to mention doctors, hospitals and their employees.
In addition the meat industry, chicken farms and other industries make money and its quite doubtful any of them care about our personal health.
Dosen't Amgen, Genetech , and Centecor have research studies showing some of the correlations between diet and illness such as heart disease , strokes and cancer?

Thanks for your input.


altelis


Mar 10, 2011, 3:03 AM
Post #203 of 509 (4138 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
xtrmecat wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
macherry wrote:
for the most part, i follow the michael pollan rule, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." i don't do dairy, other than a small bit of cheese because it makes me feel like crap. i try to shop locally, and never eat fast food, and keep the crap junk food out of the house.


i could never give up my murphy's stout

+1, except for the murphy's stout part.

I have experimented with being vegetarian for a while. I have tried giving up all gluten foods and dairy for a month when I was helping a friend transition to gluten-free dairy-free diet.

I can honestly say that I have never felt any different, regardless of what I was eating. I have always eat healthily, following seasonal diet, more or less, with big emphasis on fresh and local fruits and veggies, and local organic meat, dairy and eggs. But I have never felt any different when I had given up meat, or dairy, or anything else. I've never had any stomachaches, headaches, bloating, heartburn, flatulence, or any other symptoms that people commonly cite as being affected by their food choices.

And without seeing a shred of evidence that the foods I eat are bad for me, I enjoy eating a variety of good foods too much to give up anything in particular.



I also have done as above, with the exact same results. My little experiment was around four months though.

Burly Bob
Similar story for me as well. I did a "Paleo Challenge" with a bunch of friends which meant no grains, no legumes and no dairy for 30 days. With all those carbs eliminated the fat and protein content my diet definitely went up.

I didn't really notice much difference from my regular diet and after a month of being back on my regular diet I again don't feel any different. I certainly haven't experienced the epiphany that many Paleo Diet proponents have felt.

The changes I have made to my diet since are that I am now trying to avoid processed foods and limit my intake of wheat. I still eat bread and pasta, just not as much as I used to.

I've had similar experience. This is purely speculation, but I suspect that the people who find such massive differences in health and well-being after making large changes to their diet actually had an underlying malsorption/allergy/etc.

(In very unscientific terms....)There was some ubiquitous component of their previous diet that was irritating to their GI tract. After making a large change to their diet this particular aspect ended up, serendipitously, getting the axe, and so they now feel better.

You hear a lot about parents who've "cured" their children's "autism" with a gluten free diet. My speculation is that something similar was going on here. Their kids actually had celiac sprue and a mis-diagnosis of autism.

Like I said, speculation.


gosharks


Mar 10, 2011, 3:11 AM
Post #204 of 509 (4133 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
What about drug companies such as Genetech, Amgen and Centecor ? They thrive on people with cancer and heart disease, whether its from meat, microwaves, saturated fat, or genetic.
The drug industry wants people to remain dependent on their medicine , not to mention doctors, hospitals and their employees.
In addition the meat industry, chicken farms and other industries make money and its quite doubtful any of them care about our personal health.
Dosen't Amgen, Genetech , and Centecor have research studies showing some of the correlations between diet and illness such as heart disease , strokes and cancer?

Thanks for your input.
WTF is your point.

In almost every single post of yours that I read, I can never figure out what you are trying to say. They always seem to be a mash-up of various points that are vaguely connected to each other.


(This post was edited by gosharks on Mar 10, 2011, 3:13 AM)


kachoong


Mar 10, 2011, 3:19 AM
Post #205 of 509 (4128 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Well, don't paint every vegetarian with the same brush...


But overall, I would say that there is a trend: the more extreme someone's food choices (extreme used here as a deviation from the population mean, in any direction), the more likely it is that their entire lifestyle revolves around this choice, and the more likely it is that it is not just about food choice, it is also about morality, ethics, and self-identification.

With so many things tied togehter, attacking one part feels like an attack on the whole. Substitute food for religion, and it;s the same story, really...

very well put.

I believe if you want to eat meat, chicken, fish, its a personal decision.
I was trying to find out if climbers who are vegan or vegetarian feel their diet without meat effects their performance climbing.
However there are studies that meat has alot of hormones, antibotics and in general unhealthy.
So is it worth it? There is also a moral issue, if you can sit down and eat meat and feel nothing for the slaughter that has taken place on a animal.

Killing and dressing animals yourself would avoid all these problems.


kachoong


Mar 10, 2011, 3:23 AM
Post #206 of 509 (4124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
atg200 wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
furgie wrote:
Who said anything about God?Angelic I'm just saddened that my fellow climbers have so much faith in a theory that has been virtually disproved by the physics and mathematical scientific community. Just because its pushed so hard in our textbooks and higher schools of learning doesn't necissarily make it true. I wish people would look around and learn a little instead of swallowing the first idea thats thrown at them. And I appologize for bringing this up, more of a soapbox kinda post...

Seriously, that whole seceding from the Union thing, I support it.


http://www.texassecede.org

Viva la revolucion!

We should just do a straight up trade with Mexico - Texas for Baja.

I'm not going to inflict anything like a horde of overweight, ignorant, repressive texans on poor mexico...

Heh... horde


jt512


Mar 10, 2011, 6:50 AM
Post #209 of 509 (4083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [johnwesely] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay


jt512


Mar 10, 2011, 7:01 AM
Post #210 of 509 (4079 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

What about drug companies such as Genetech, Amgen and Centecor ? They thrive on people with cancer and heart disease, whether its from meat, microwaves, saturated fat, or genetic.
The drug industry wants people to remain dependent on their medicine , not to mention doctors, hospitals and their employees.
In addition the meat industry, chicken farms and other industries make money and its quite doubtful any of them care about our personal health.
Dosen't Amgen, Genetech , and Centecor have research studies showing some of the correlations between diet and illness such as heart disease , strokes and cancer?

Welcome to the Twilight Zone

Jay


johnwesely


Mar 10, 2011, 12:02 PM
Post #212 of 509 (4053 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay

I heard in my food science class that it was more like 1 in 10,000 eggs where contaminated on the inside of the egg, and I have heard that figure elsewhere.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 10, 2011, 12:21 PM
Post #213 of 509 (4044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
"Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Some science in the historic diet: http://www.nature.com/...l/news.2010.549.html

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.
Wiki is my friend too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

We percieve paleolithic cultures thru the filter of our culture and the filters of our intellectual forefathers. People who lived with paleolithic technology were not grubbing around in the dirt eating horrible food becasue that was all they had. They were feasting.

In the link above it listed cattail as one of the food items listed. Have you had it? Very tastety (make sure you wash the dirt off). The pollen makes an especially fine flour. Using the roots to make a gnocci and eaten with some escargo, some herbs, and you have a great meal. Fit to get your send on. Cook the paste into a bread, serve with some preserved meat made by cool smoke, and it is food fit for a trad climb.

Given paleolithic technology and a place we could live off the land, we could easily live, climb and feast. Throw in our ability to trade with others and, really, what would you die of? If it was our families, brother, it wouldn't be malnutrition or from eating dull food.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 10, 2011, 12:25 PM
Post #214 of 509 (4043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [johnwesely] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay

I heard in my food science class that it was more like 1 in 10,000 eggs where contaminated on the inside of the egg, and I have heard that figure elsewhere.

JT was trolling. He specifically said he "heard", he was digging that people hear food stuff that isn't science based and they pass the information on like it is real. You've been here long enough to know that JT would never put a fake percent statistic up unless he was kidding or taking a shot at someone else.


johnwesely


Mar 10, 2011, 12:29 PM
Post #215 of 509 (4041 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay

I heard in my food science class that it was more like 1 in 10,000 eggs where contaminated on the inside of the egg, and I have heard that figure elsewhere.

JT was trolling. He specifically said he "heard", he was digging that people hear food stuff that isn't science based and they pass the information on like it is real. You've been here long enough to know that JT would never put a fake percent statistic up unless he was kidding or taking a shot at someone else.

Now I have egg on my face...


Partner rrrADAM


Mar 10, 2011, 2:18 PM
Post #217 of 509 (4008 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.

Not necessarily true, though yes, technically most humans in the first world are living longer today than ever before in the species' existence.

But, based on paleontological evidence, average age for hunter-gatherer males from around 100,000-10,000 years ago was in the late 60s, height was around 5'10". However, average age for men from about 10,000-100 years ago was around 40. Agriculture, and the accompanying disease, class stratifications, etc., was actually a bad thing for our species in a lot of ways.

Check out Diamond's "The Third Chimpanzee" for more details.


Thanx Paul! Just bought it thru Amazon.


(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 10, 2011, 2:22 PM)


Partner camhead


Mar 10, 2011, 2:31 PM
Post #218 of 509 (4002 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
camhead wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.

Not necessarily true, though yes, technically most humans in the first world are living longer today than ever before in the species' existence.

But, based on paleontological evidence, average age for hunter-gatherer males from around 100,000-10,000 years ago was in the late 60s, height was around 5'10". However, average age for men from about 10,000-100 years ago was around 40. Agriculture, and the accompanying disease, class stratifications, etc., was actually a bad thing for our species in a lot of ways.

Check out Diamond's "The Third Chimpanzee" for more details.


Thanx Paul! Just bought it thru Amazon.

Sweet, you'll like it, even though it is nearly 20 years old, and some of his speculations have been elaborated on more fully. For example, he states that it is unlikely that Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals ever mated, and DNA evidence has since shown that they did a little.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 10, 2011, 3:27 PM
Post #219 of 509 (3984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Sweet, you'll like it, even though it is nearly 20 years old, and some of his speculations have been elaborated on more fully. For example, he states that it is unlikely that Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals ever mated, and DNA evidence has since shown that they did a little.

And here is the result of that mating



Partner rrrADAM


Mar 10, 2011, 3:53 PM
Post #220 of 509 (3966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:
camhead wrote:
rrrADAM wrote:

I know there are other circumstances involved, other than that of diet, but they didn't live very long back then... In fact, we live longer now than we ever did.

There are people on this planet who still eat a more hunter-gatherer type diet, comparable to that of prehistoric times, so I would be curious as to their longevity, especially the ones who do have some access to medical care.

Not necessarily true, though yes, technically most humans in the first world are living longer today than ever before in the species' existence.

But, based on paleontological evidence, average age for hunter-gatherer males from around 100,000-10,000 years ago was in the late 60s, height was around 5'10". However, average age for men from about 10,000-100 years ago was around 40. Agriculture, and the accompanying disease, class stratifications, etc., was actually a bad thing for our species in a lot of ways.

Check out Diamond's "The Third Chimpanzee" for more details.


Thanx Paul! Just bought it thru Amazon.

Sweet, you'll like it, even though it is nearly 20 years old, and some of his speculations have been elaborated on more fully. For example, he states that it is unlikely that Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals ever mated, and DNA evidence has since shown that they did a little.

Yes, I seem to remember that being covered in this more recent book:



A good read, if you haven;t read it already.


(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 10, 2011, 3:54 PM)


jt512


Mar 10, 2011, 9:09 PM
Post #221 of 509 (3924 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [johnwesely] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay

I heard in my food science class that it was more like 1 in 10,000 eggs where contaminated on the inside of the egg, and I have heard that figure elsewhere.

Maybe the 60% figure is for the outside of the egg, then. I assume that they sanitize them somehow before they leave the factory.

Actually, the figure I recall was probably the flock prevalence. See this abstract, for instance, which states that the flock prevalence for salmonella in Quebec was estimated to be 50%.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 10, 2011, 9:34 PM)


caughtinside


Mar 10, 2011, 9:11 PM
Post #222 of 509 (3921 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
jt512 wrote:
If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

Even if you don't, the chance is still low enough that I don't fret about including raw eggs in my diet occasionally.

Last I heard, something like 60% of California eggs were contaminated with Salmonella.

Jay

I heard in my food science class that it was more like 1 in 10,000 eggs where contaminated on the inside of the egg, and I have heard that figure elsewhere.

Maybe the 60% figure is for the outside of the egg, then. I assume that they sanitize them somehow before they leave the factory.

Jay

Don't order the Caeser salad! It's death!


enigma


Mar 11, 2011, 10:08 AM
Post #223 of 509 (3873 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Its alot healthier than meat, with hormones, antibotics, and aren't there studies that show a correlation between cancer and eating meat?

This is still an open question. Studies, have shown conflicting results, and many of the studies had weak designs. There seems to be a weak relation between red meat and colorectal cancer, and a somewhat stronger correlation specifically for processed red meats.

There is a new very large well-designed study with nearly 100,000 subjects, including a large number of vegetarians, which should help clarify the situation when it begins reporting results in the next few years.

In reply to:
The eggs I'm still on the fence about. They seem to have alot problems with freshness and people getting sick from salomenella.

If you thoroughly cook eggs and wash your hands after handling raw eggs, you won't get salmonella from them.

Jay

What about drug companies such as Genetech, Amgen and Centecor ? They thrive on people with cancer and heart disease, whether its from meat, microwaves, saturated fat, or genetic.
The drug industry wants people to remain dependent on their medicine , not to mention doctors, hospitals and their employees.
In addition the meat industry, chicken farms and other industries make money and its quite doubtful any of them care about our personal health.
Dosen't Amgen, Genetech , and Centecor have research studies showing some of the correlations between diet and illness such as heart disease , strokes and cancer?

Welcome to the Twilight Zone

Jay

Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?
How does specific foods and lifestyle factor in? Are they vegetarian? Free from exposure to nuclear radiation plants?
Is it a less toxic environment , less pollution, or is the minerals such as coral calcium in the sea?



As climbers we need to be healthy and fit .

If you get cancer or heart disease its unlikely you would be able to continue with this sport.

( I can't imagine how awful it must be for someone to be on a list of being recruited by Genetech because they have malignant tumors )

Hoping that their new drug will eradicate their illness.

I appreciate your opinion.


gosharks


Mar 11, 2011, 10:15 AM
Post #224 of 509 (3871 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

1. Proper English please? I can't understand "What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?"

2. Google has never heard of "The New England Centurian Study."


(This post was edited by gosharks on Mar 11, 2011, 10:16 AM)


Rufsen


Mar 11, 2011, 2:22 PM
Post #225 of 509 (4033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.


Partner camhead


Mar 11, 2011, 2:59 PM
Post #226 of 509 (4020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [Rufsen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.

Yes, but in light of this morning, we are seeing that there are drawbacks to living near the ocean as well.


spikeddem


Mar 11, 2011, 3:01 PM
Post #227 of 509 (4016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.

Yes, but in light of this morning, we are seeing that there are drawbacks to living near the ocean as well.
The tsunami is a government cover-up.


c4c


Mar 11, 2011, 3:19 PM
Post #228 of 509 (4009 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.

Yes, but in light of this morning, we are seeing that there are drawbacks to living near the ocean as well.
The tsunami is a government cover-up.

It's God's wrath on vegetarians.


kachoong


Mar 11, 2011, 3:29 PM
Post #229 of 509 (4002 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [c4c] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

c4c wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.

Yes, but in light of this morning, we are seeing that there are drawbacks to living near the ocean as well.
The tsunami is a government cover-up.

It's God's wrath on vegetarians.

It's an obvious sign... people need to eat more seaweed.


justroberto


Mar 11, 2011, 3:34 PM
Post #230 of 509 (3996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [kachoong] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
c4c wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
camhead wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks for the Twlight Zone

What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ? Are these people eating differently? What do you attribute these blue zones relationship and their diet?

So populations who live next to the ocean seem to live longer. Maybe something in their diet works swimmingly to protect them against cardiovascular disease.

But what could it be? Something they have in common, somehow related to their diet, these people who live next to the ocean.

Yes, but in light of this morning, we are seeing that there are drawbacks to living near the ocean as well.
The tsunami is a government cover-up.

It's God's wrath on vegetarians.

It's an obvious sign... people need to eat more seaweed.

And uncooked fish. Sue, gnaw me?




Partner rrrADAM


Mar 11, 2011, 5:36 PM
Post #231 of 509 (3971 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
...where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100...

Ummm... That's not saying much, since I can 'predict' that with much greater than 77% accuracy, by just 'predicting' that nobody will live to 100, since far less than 23% of people live to that age, therefore the statement that nobody will make it to that age is greater than 77% accurate.

In fact... A quick google check yields percentages of people living to 100 in this day and age, to be between 7% and 14%, depending on the source, so, that would make my statement 86%-93% accurate.


(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 11, 2011, 5:38 PM)


jomagam


Mar 11, 2011, 6:08 PM
Post #232 of 509 (3957 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In fact... A quick google check yields percentages of people living to 100 in this day and age, to be between 7% and 14%, depending on the source, so, that would make my statement 86%-93% accurate.

That seems way off. What are your sources ?


Partner macherry


Mar 11, 2011, 6:23 PM
Post #233 of 509 (3945 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:

As climbers we need to be healthy and fit .

If you get cancer or heart disease its unlikely you would be able to continue with this sport.

( I can't imagine how awful it must be for someone to be on a list of being recruited by Genetech because they have malignant tumors )

Hoping that their new drug will eradicate their illness.

I appreciate your opinion.

cancer or heart disease is not a death sentence. i believe there are many cancer survivors or people living with cancer and heart disease still participating in athletic activities


jomagam


Mar 11, 2011, 6:30 PM
Post #234 of 509 (3939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The New England Centurian(sic) Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100

That 77% figure illustrates lies damned lies and statistics very nicely. Is it:

o for 77% percent of the population they can successfully predict if a person lives to be 100 ?

o did 77% of the people that they predicted live to be 100 ?

o if so, what is the ratio of people correctly predicted to live 100 vs people not predicted to live 100, but did

o what was the average/median age of the sample ? 20 ? 50 ? 95 ?


jomagam


Mar 11, 2011, 6:34 PM
Post #235 of 509 (3937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [jomagam] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From http://outlier.bookofodds.com/...l-You-Live-to-Be-100:

the predicted odds a one-year-old will live to at least 100 years old are 1 in 39.57. Making it through the perilous teenage years raises the odds only slightly; the predicted odds a 21-year-old will live to at least 100 are 1 in 39.29.

But once those candles start piling up in middle age, a long life is looking better and better. At 50, your odds improve to 1 in 37.34, jumping to 1 in 21.48 once you reach 80. Before you know it, you’ll be 90 years old, with 1 in 8.85 odds of making it to the century mark.


jt512


Mar 11, 2011, 6:38 PM
Post #236 of 509 (3929 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay


sp115


Mar 11, 2011, 6:45 PM
Post #237 of 509 (3918 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay

It would have been a much more interesting study had it actually been conducted on Centurions.


- just sayin'


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 11, 2011, 6:51 PM
Post #238 of 509 (3912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:

As climbers we need to be healthy and fit .

If you get cancer or heart disease its unlikely you would be able to continue with this sport.

( I can't imagine how awful it must be for someone to be on a list of being recruited by Genetech because they have malignant tumors )

Hoping that their new drug will eradicate their illness.

I appreciate your opinion.

cancer or heart disease is not a death sentence. i believe there are many cancer survivors or people living with cancer and heart disease still participating in athletic activities

I think I agree with what I think you're trying to say, but considering that "heart disease" as an umbrella term is the leading cause of death in most of North America, it could certainly be called a death sentence. Of course, it depends on what you consider "heart disease".


jt512


Mar 11, 2011, 8:32 PM
Post #239 of 509 (3876 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [rrrADAM] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rrrADAM wrote:
enigma wrote:
...where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100...

Ummm... That's not saying much, since I can 'predict' that with much greater than 77% accuracy, by just 'predicting' that nobody will live to 100, since far less than 23% of people live to that age, therefore the statement that nobody will make it to that age is greater than 77% accurate.

In fact... A quick google check yields percentages of people living to 100 in this day and age, to be between 7% and 14%, depending on the source, so, that would make my statement 86%-93% accurate.

Yes, but although you correctly identify 100% of the non-centenarians, you correctly identify none of the centenarians, which makes your method useless for identifying (or predicting) which individuals are centenarians.

In technical terms, your model has 100% specificity and 0% sensitivity, whereas (a look at the paper reveals) that their model has 77% specificity and 77% sensitivity. They have sacrificed the specificity of your model in exchange for sensitivity.

If their model predicts that you are a centenarian, then your odds of actually being a centenarian are 77:23, or 3.35:1. On the other hand, if their model predicts that you are not a centenarian, then the odds that you really are not a centenarian are 23:77, or 0.299:1. Dividing the first odds by the second gives an odds ratio of 11.2.

In other words, if their model predicts that you are a centenarian, then your odds of actually being a centenarian are 11 times that of the average person.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 11, 2011, 10:57 PM)


jt512


Mar 11, 2011, 8:54 PM
Post #240 of 509 (3869 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jomagam] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
In reply to:
The New England Centurian(sic) Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100

That 77% figure illustrates lies damned lies and statistics very nicely. Is it:

o for 77% percent of the population they can successfully predict if a person lives to be 100 ?

o did 77% of the people that they predicted live to be 100 ?

o if so, what is the ratio of people correctly predicted to live 100 vs people not predicted to live 100, but did

o what was the average/median age of the sample ? 20 ? 50 ? 95 ?

In the time that you took to write all these questions, you could have looked up the paper and actually found the answers.

Jay


wonderwoman


Mar 11, 2011, 10:39 PM
Post #246 of 509 (3797 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Please don't post personal attacks or quote personal attacks. I can't keep up with you guys via iphone!


chadnsc


Mar 11, 2011, 10:51 PM
Post #247 of 509 (3788 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Please don't post personal attacks or quote personal attacks. I can't keep up with you guys via iphone!


Excuse me?

I did not post a personal attack or quote one. Jomagam said he wanted us users decide when his conversation with Jay turned personal.

I quoted his post (in which jomagam happened to call Jay a 'dick') and let him know that it turned personal when HE acted immature and resorted to name calling. You hiding jomanam’s and my posts simply give the guy a pass and allow him not to take responsibility for what he wrote.

Oh and put down your I phone. Tongue


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 11, 2011, 10:52 PM
Post #248 of 509 (3785 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Please don't post personal attacks or quote personal attacks. I can't keep up with you guys via iphone!

Can we quote spray?


jt512


Mar 11, 2011, 10:54 PM
Post #249 of 509 (3782 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
Please don't post personal attacks or quote personal attacks. I can't keep up with you guys via iphone!


Excuse me?

I did not post a personal attack or quote one.

She has a point. I quoted the personal attack as well, which kind of necessitates that the moderator delete our posts, too.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 11, 2011, 10:55 PM)


chadnsc


Mar 11, 2011, 11:08 PM
Post #250 of 509 (3830 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
chadnsc wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
Please don't post personal attacks or quote personal attacks. I can't keep up with you guys via iphone!


Excuse me?

I did not post a personal attack or quote one.

She has a point. I quoted the personal attack as well, which kind of necessitates that the moderator delete our posts, too.

Jay


I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

Ah to mod us, it's a tough job. Laugh


saint_john


Mar 11, 2011, 11:16 PM
Post #251 of 509 (3824 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

this thread is so yesterday.


Partner cracklover


Mar 11, 2011, 11:17 PM
Post #252 of 509 (3824 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay

I read about that study when it came out. One of the most interesting things about it hasn't been mentioned here.

The people who have the markers they've identified not only live longer they also live better. IIRC, this was not what they were specifically looking for, it was an un-anticipated correlation.

Basically these people experienced old age the way most of us will experience middle age: yes there are problems, but they are not debilitating, and the body and mind basically work great. It's quite remarkable, actually.

If further study backs up their findings, I bet there will be a lot of interest in those few families lucky enough to contain those genes.

Just for example, imagine how much you could make as a sperm donor to a rich and powerful family...

GO


chadnsc


Mar 11, 2011, 11:19 PM
Post #253 of 509 (3821 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
this thread is so yesterday.

Well I'm glad you're keep current then.


jomagam


Mar 12, 2011, 12:22 AM
Post #254 of 509 (3801 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

I stand by what I said. Jay's reply didn't add anything to the conversation, wasn't informative or funny and did not pass my would I say it to a person that I want to be on good term with test.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 12:31 AM
Post #255 of 509 (3793 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay

I read about that study when it came out. One of the most interesting things about it hasn't been mentioned here.

The people who have the markers they've identified not only live longer they also live better. IIRC, this was not what they were specifically looking for, it was an un-anticipated correlation.

Basically these people experienced old age the way most of us will experience middle age: yes there are problems, but they are not debilitating, and the body and mind basically work great. It's quite remarkable, actually.

If further study backs up their findings, I bet there will be a lot of interest in those few families lucky enough to contain those genes.

Just for example, imagine how much you could make as a sperm donor to a rich and powerful family...

GO

Good Point, and egg donors with those genetic markers will be particularly valuable.
There is already research in place where they through IVF can replace some cells.
I don't believe it has gotten to the stage where they can ethically and legally do it.

So perhaps the "survival of the fittest" has some correlation with the New England Study after all?


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 12, 2011, 12:35 AM
Post #256 of 509 (3790 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [jomagam] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
In reply to:
I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

I stand by what I said. Jay's reply didn't add anything to the conversation, wasn't informative or funny and did not pass my would I say it to a person that I want to be on good term with test.

If everybody used that test the only entertainment you'd get out of the internet would be porn.


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 12:38 AM
Post #257 of 509 (3786 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [jomagam] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
In reply to:
I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

I stand by what I said. Jay's reply didn't add anything to the conversation, wasn't informative or funny and did not pass my would I say it to a person that I want to be on good term with test.

Interesting, you and I had the same question about the meaning of "77% accuracy." Your reaction was to post about how the authors were deliberately or negligently vague about a term they used in an abstract that is officially limited to 125 words, even though they clearly explained the term in the publicly available paper and on-line supplementary materials. My reaction was to look at the paper and see what they meant by it. As an added irony, the authors used the term correctly, according to the technical definition in their field, so you had nothing to complain about in the first place; you were just ignorant of the vocabulary of the field.

Jay


jomagam


Mar 12, 2011, 1:18 AM
Post #258 of 509 (3767 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 364

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
jomagam wrote:
In reply to:
I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

I stand by what I said. Jay's reply didn't add anything to the conversation, wasn't informative or funny and did not pass my would I say it to a person that I want to be on good term with test.

Interesting, you and I had the same question about the meaning of "77% accuracy." Your reaction was to post about how the authors were deliberately or negligently vague about a term they used in an abstract that is officially limited to 125 words, even though they clearly explained the term in the publicly available paper and on-line supplementary materials. My reaction was to look at the paper and see what they meant by it. As an added irony, the authors used the term correctly, according to the technical definition in their field, so you had nothing to complain about in the first place; you were just ignorant of the vocabulary of the field.

Jay

Yeah, I'm ignorant to the vocab of statistics, though I did learn a few things today. That's why in my 5-minute break I did a fun exercise and thought of different things that "77%" could mean instead of diving into an academic paper. Sue me. And thanks for reading it.


chadnsc


Mar 12, 2011, 1:31 AM
Post #259 of 509 (3762 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [jomagam] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jomagam wrote:
In reply to:
I know. I just think that when someone says something they should have to stand by it and fess up to it when it was offensive or inappropriate.

I stand by what I said. Jay's reply didn't add anything to the conversation, wasn't informative or funny and did not pass my would I say it to a person that I want to be on good term with test.


You have an anonymous internet profile, you stand by nothing.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 1:46 AM
Post #260 of 509 (3750 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

 Interestingly enough there is a gene for resilience the ability to adapt to lifes events.
So for people who experience Japan Tsunami and survive if they have that specific gene have a better chance at weathering the event.
Included within the New England Study.

Accordingly 1/4 of the subjects whom were at least 100. Research by Thomas Perls MD, and Margery Silver M.D.

There is also a article in Scientific America this month which explains the resilience gene in regard to the brain. Examples such as Katrina and the World Trade Center are noted.


Obviously there are other genetic markers, that would impact longevity that are included within the New England Study.


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 12, 2011, 2:10 AM)


marc801


Mar 12, 2011, 6:30 AM
Post #261 of 509 (3705 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
She has a point. I quoted the personal attack as well, which kind of necessitates that the moderator delete our posts, too.
There have been many posts deleted from this topic. Even entire sub-threads.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 1:36 PM
Post #262 of 509 (3685 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:

As climbers we need to be healthy and fit .

If you get cancer or heart disease its unlikely you would be able to continue with this sport.

( I can't imagine how awful it must be for someone to be on a list of being recruited by Genetech because they have malignant tumors )

Hoping that their new drug will eradicate their illness.

I appreciate your opinion.[/quote/


Cancer or heart disease is not a death sentence. i believe there are many cancer survivors or people living with cancer and heart disease still participating in athletic activities

You are right look at Lance Armstrong after having testicular cancer he did the tour de france.
I know a women who had cancer that tried to run a marathon , I think she mostly walked but it was good for her recovery.

However the point I was trying to make was wouldn't it be better to change your diet and lifestyle so you would have less of a chance of getting these diseases.
I know people who have had heart problems and cancer,and its very scary and the treatment is very rough on your system.
Radiation or Chemotherapy weakens your system.

Some cancer patients are not so lucky they have malignant tumors. and their options is try to be recruited by Biotech and R&D companies and hope to get to be part of their experimental drug trials.

I was looking at a prevention of those diseases. Obviously there is also genetic. Someone with a family history of heart disease is more likely to get it.

Do you live in Quebec City?
My Mom's Family are from Montreal and she grew up there, She told me she skiied there.
What Mountains do you climb at? I might visit later this summer.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 1:44 PM
Post #263 of 509 (3684 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
It all boils down to personal choice. the bottom line is that is possible to be veagn and be a world class athlete. just ask Mac Danzig or Steph Davis.

Do you eat fish? I didn;t eat it for about a month but then I started riding my bike outside and climbing and I craved it. So I recently had wild salmon with no preservatives from Alaska.

As you know its a transition. Cool


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 1:55 PM
Post #264 of 509 (3677 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
I am doing my best to not participate in industrial agriculture. It's not sustainable & it makes us sick.

What is "industrial"? Do you only buy from Amish farmers? Does driving to the farm make it not sustainable? Is there a yield per acer needed to be sustainable?

And for the record, eat more snails - the real first domesticated animal.

Yes - I know (but have yet to understand why) you are in favor of industrial agriculture. I do not want to eat animals that have been fed growth hormones & antibiotics, all the while covered in their own shit that overflows into the nearest watershed. I would rather support local organic farmers whose produce lasts a lot longer in my fridge rather than gnaw on some limp, colorless carrot that's been shipped halfway across the world & is covered in pesticide. Fresher produce retains nutrients longer & tastes better.

I guess it's a personal preference, though.

did Toast actually say he was in favour of industrial farming? i get the point he's making, about industrial farming. what defines industrial farming. Maybe factory farming is a more apt description.

i also have issues with the word "organic". there are no real regulations with regards to what makes something organic.


Sounds like you watch what you eat , the difference in being organic is using not pesticides, and the soil has to believe with no chemicals or animals products.
How long have you been vegan? How do you feel? Do you ever have eggs, dairy or fish?


saint_john


Mar 12, 2011, 2:23 PM
Post #265 of 509 (3666 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
saint_john wrote:
It all boils down to personal choice. the bottom line is that is possible to be veagn and be a world class athlete. just ask Mac Danzig or Steph Davis.

Do you eat fish? I didn;t eat it for about a month but then I started riding my bike outside and climbing and I craved it. So I recently had wild salmon with no preservatives from Alaska.

As you know its a transition. Cool

I stopped eating meat almost a year ago. I run, ride a bike, climb, and lifts weights and don,t miss meat. I had been eating fish but am currently transitioning to a vegan diet. I feel great so far. my body fat has dropped from about 12 to 10 and I feel stronger than ever. I've also cut waaaaaaay back on alcohol.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 2:49 PM
Post #266 of 509 (3658 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
enigma wrote:
So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

Nutrition and diet is only one of the many contributors to athletic performance.

I don't think there has been any climbing-specific studies (although I could be wrong), but nutrition and it's impact on performance has been studied for quite some time.

As far as your question goes, I eat meat. My wife is vegan. We both climb pretty well. I do climb harder but I am pretty sure it's not because of our diet.

Josh

Well now we have other information such as blue zones where people live to 100. With a diet based mostly on plants and low fat . and perhaps some quality wild fish.
Especially when you consider the correlation of red meat and heart disease and cancer.
In addition there is the New England Study of Centurian and there diet to consider.
As well as your genetic markers that can with 77% accuracy give you the likehood of living to 100.

It would be helpful for you and your wife to read those studies for yourselves.

So isn't it difficult when you prepare a meal and you are cooking meat and your wife is cooking tofu dosen't the smell bother her? Or watching you eat meat ?
Do you have separate pans. I wouldn't eat off a pan that someone cooked a hamburger on and now I want to make a veggie pattie.
Do you sometimes just have veggies with her and not have the meat or chicken. I will say raw chicken or meat is very unappetizing for me to look at or smell. It must be hard for you to prepare these dinner foods together at least for her.
When I was living with my boyfriend he usually would buy hamburgers to go to avoid the above situation.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 3:04 PM
Post #267 of 509 (3651 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jcosgrove] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jcosgrove wrote:
enigma wrote:
So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

Everybody is different. Experiment, keep daily food/exercise/"how you feel" logs, and find what works for you.

Thanks , I haven't had meat or chicken,lamb. ham etc for 9 years . I pretty much know its unhealthy due to the antibotics, high fat, hormones and on top of that I have found scientic research that bears this out.
The Study of the Blue Zones Coast Areas in Costa Rica , Okinara, Greece Isolated Island, Sardina, off the Nicoya Pennisula that bears out the correlation of people who live to 100 have a mostly plant based diet and perhaps some healthy wild fish,

Additionally the Recent Study from the New England Study of living to be 100 finds the genetic markers with a 77% rate of a persons genome or genetic markers . It also supports what these people are eating similiarily.

Hope you are climbing well and feeling great and if you get some time check up on these articles .
Living to 100 being healthy , with less illnes like heart disease is a good thing. No one wants to be sick in the hospital . Especially when they can be climbing and feeling good. Thanks


Gmburns2000


Mar 12, 2011, 3:24 PM
Post #268 of 509 (3643 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
So isn't it difficult when you prepare a meal and you are cooking meat and your wife is cooking tofu dosen't the smell bother her? Or watching you eat meat ?
Do you have separate pans. I wouldn't eat off a pan that someone cooked a hamburger on and now I want to make a veggie pattie.
Do you sometimes just have veggies with her and not have the meat or chicken. I will say raw chicken or meat is very unappetizing for me to look at or smell. It must be hard for you to prepare these dinner foods together at least for her.
When I was living with my boyfriend he usually would buy hamburgers to go to avoid the above situation.

I was married to a pescatarian (is that the right word?). She didn't like the smell of cooking beef, chicken, or lamb either, but she encouraged me to cook it at home as long as I cleaned those pots, pans, or dishes afterward, which I would have done anyway.

Simply put, it was her choice, not mine, to not eat meat other than fish. She always said it would have been selfish to make me adhere to her choices over food (cookies and sweets aside because she couldn't stay away from those if they were in the houseLaugh). I personally couldn't live with someone who would constantly put pressure on me to adhere to those choices, so I'm glad she was fair and flexible.

Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter? I haven't cooked with butter in maybe 15 years, and I've always considered olive oil to be a much better alternative. Just curious if that is a major reason for why some people are healthier than others (broadly speaking).


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 3:27 PM
Post #269 of 509 (3639 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
LostinMaine wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
The diet and cleanliness are independent factors. The recent regulations were more of an impact to smaller operations than larger ones. It is the larger companies that can afford to find out if there is a pathogen, smaller operations only hope they don't have a problem and have no traceability.

While this may be true (that larger companies can afford testing), unfortunately that has not worked so well in the past, whether speaking of meat or veggies. If you have a small-scale operation in which the chances of contamination are orders of magnitude lower, the need for testing is reduced dramatically.

Essentially, if you have shit in the food (veiled nicely as E. Coli or coliform), you need to find it. If your operation is meticulous enough to keep it out of the food, what exactly would one be testing for? If one must irradiate the food to make it safe, one must test that equipment. Why not instead clean machines after each animal or vegetable run?

That is the fundamental problem with industrial farming. When throughput takes a higher priority than food quality and safety, we have issues. Most of this, of course, would go away if public viewing of the processing facilities was permissible and seed companies (or seed company?) were not true monopolies that trade CEOs with the USDA.

The risk for larger companies is in a larger impact. I have seen no studies on size and the relationship to cleanliness of butchery. I've seen small back room butchers that were far sloppier with sanitation than some mega producers. The difference is that now we can track the bug back with it's DNA footprint. A small operation doesn't have enough people get sick to be able to trace the bugs back to them. It doesn't mean they have a lower percent get sick, just fewer people.

The same profit margin pressure that tempts big companies exists for smaller ones as well, profits vs safety vs quality isn't exclusive to food or big ag.


Usually the butchers aren't clean and their meat has hormones, antibiotics, and fat that clogs your arteries . Cause more heart disease and cancer.

I have included the recent New England Study of people who live to 100. and their genetic markers.
As well as the blue zone in Costa Rica , Okinara, Sardina, Ikaria, and the isolated Nicoya Pennisula as additional evidence showing the diets of these people are largely plant based. They don't get cancer, stroke or heart disease.

It will be pretty hard to climb if you get a heart attack, stroke, cancer and various other health illness that are closely correlated to what your diet and lifestyle is. However to each their own.

I don't feel like being part of some recruiting for Genetech when I have malignant tumors and desperately trying that their new drug will help me .


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 3:41 PM
Post #270 of 509 (3627 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
enigma wrote:
So isn't it difficult when you prepare a meal and you are cooking meat and your wife is cooking tofu dosen't the smell bother her? Or watching you eat meat ?
Do you have separate pans. I wouldn't eat off a pan that someone cooked a hamburger on and now I want to make a veggie pattie.
Do you sometimes just have veggies with her and not have the meat or chicken. I will say raw chicken or meat is very unappetizing for me to look at or smell. It must be hard for you to prepare these dinner foods together at least for her.
When I was living with my boyfriend he usually would buy hamburgers to go to avoid the above situation.

I was married to a pescatarian (is that the right word?). She didn't like the smell of cooking beef, chicken, or lamb either, but she encouraged me to cook it at home as long as I cleaned those pots, pans, or dishes afterward, which I would have done anyway.

Simply put, it was her choice, not mine, to not eat meat other than fish. She always said it would have been selfish to make me adhere to her choices over food (cookies and sweets aside because she couldn't stay away from those if they were in the houseLaugh). I personally couldn't live with someone who would constantly put pressure on me to adhere to those choices, so I'm glad she was fair and flexible.

Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter? I haven't cooked with butter in maybe 15 years, and I've always considered olive oil to be a much better alternative. Just curious if that is a major reason for why some people are healthier than others (broadly speaking).


Olive oil is better, however you are still having the worst fat in meat.
Meat will cause clogged heart vessels which could lead to heart attack do to the plague building up. in addition cancer from meat
The studys from the New England Medical for living to 100. show various genetic markers and lifestyle choices.
In addition there is another study in reference to the blue zones in the coasts of Costa Rica, Okinara, Sardina, and Ikaria as well the Nicoyla Pennisula that has similiar findings of what these people over 100 eat, its largely vegetables, no saturated fat, fruit, no meat and perhaps some wild fish so there is a strong correlation between diet, health, disease and living long and well

Thereby being able to climb and be fit and not sick with tumors waiting to be recruited to try out some drug to save you.


blueeyedclimber


Mar 12, 2011, 3:48 PM
Post #271 of 509 (3623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:

Well now we have other information such as blue zones where people live to 100. With a diet based mostly on plants and low fat . and perhaps some quality wild fish.
Especially when you consider the correlation of red meat and heart disease and cancer.

I had never heard of these blue zones until you brought them up. These zones that you talk about are not just about eating healthy, but about living an overall healthy and productive life. Eating right, daily exercise, managing stress, having healthy human relationships, belonging to something worthwhile, etc. are all important components of these cultures. I'm an elementary phys ed/health teacher and this exactly what I teach my children....that comprehensive health is important. All aspects of health need to be taken care of. Now, the oldest student I teach is 12 years old, so we never get into very complicated health topics, but even children can understand how to live a healthy life. But, it must be encouraged in the home.

In reply to:
In addition there is the New England Study of Centurian and there diet to consider.
As well as your genetic markers that can with 77% accuracy give you the likehood of living to 100.
I believe you mean Centenarian. I haven't read the study, but I assume it is just studying the health of people age 100+.


In reply to:
So isn't it difficult when you prepare a meal and you are cooking meat and your wife is cooking tofu dosen't the smell bother her? Or watching you eat meat ?
Do you have separate pans. I wouldn't eat off a pan that someone cooked a hamburger on and now I want to make a veggie pattie.
Do you sometimes just have veggies with her and not have the meat or chicken. I will say raw chicken or meat is very unappetizing for me to look at or smell. It must be hard for you to prepare these dinner foods together at least for her.

I generally only eat meat when we go out. Sometimes I will buy some meat at a farmer's market and prepare it for just myself and my daughter. That's usually if my wife is at class or will not be home for some other reason. Most of the time however, Tiff cooks and I eat vegetarian. When I cook, most often it is either pasta or something else easy, like quesadillas or burritos.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 3:54 PM
Post #272 of 509 (3618 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [wonderwoman] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.
So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?


Gmburns2000


Mar 12, 2011, 3:59 PM
Post #273 of 509 (3614 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
enigma wrote:
So isn't it difficult when you prepare a meal and you are cooking meat and your wife is cooking tofu dosen't the smell bother her? Or watching you eat meat ?
Do you have separate pans. I wouldn't eat off a pan that someone cooked a hamburger on and now I want to make a veggie pattie.
Do you sometimes just have veggies with her and not have the meat or chicken. I will say raw chicken or meat is very unappetizing for me to look at or smell. It must be hard for you to prepare these dinner foods together at least for her.
When I was living with my boyfriend he usually would buy hamburgers to go to avoid the above situation.

I was married to a pescatarian (is that the right word?). She didn't like the smell of cooking beef, chicken, or lamb either, but she encouraged me to cook it at home as long as I cleaned those pots, pans, or dishes afterward, which I would have done anyway.

Simply put, it was her choice, not mine, to not eat meat other than fish. She always said it would have been selfish to make me adhere to her choices over food (cookies and sweets aside because she couldn't stay away from those if they were in the houseLaugh). I personally couldn't live with someone who would constantly put pressure on me to adhere to those choices, so I'm glad she was fair and flexible.

Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter? I haven't cooked with butter in maybe 15 years, and I've always considered olive oil to be a much better alternative. Just curious if that is a major reason for why some people are healthier than others (broadly speaking).


Olive oil is better, however you are still having the worst fat in meat.
Meat will cause clogged heart vessels which could lead to heart attack do to the plague building up. in addition cancer from meat
The studys from the New England Medical for living to 100. show various genetic markers and lifestyle choices.
In addition there is another study in reference to the blue zones in the coasts of Costa Rica, Okinara, Sardina, and Ikaria as well the Nicoyla Pennisula that has similiar findings of what these people over 100 eat, its largely vegetables, no saturated fat, fruit, no meat and perhaps some wild fish so there is a strong correlation between diet, health, disease and living long and well

Thereby being able to climb and be fit and not sick with tumors waiting to be recruited to try out some drug to save you.

OH MY GOD!!!! I'M GONNA DIE!!!!!!!!!ShockedShockedShocked

I'm fine.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 4:04 PM
Post #274 of 509 (3613 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jcosgrove] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jcosgrove wrote:
enigma wrote:
So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

Everybody is different. Experiment, keep daily food/exercise/"how you feel" logs, and find what works for you.

That is so true, I eat vegetarian no eggs or milk but wild fish on occasion. I like a little cheese. Honestly though I was vegan for a month and everything I ate digested easier.
Then I started biking again in addition to climbing and felt I craved fish so I have had salmon this week

I found some studies by the New England Journal of Medicine of people who live to 100 and they can determine someone likehood from their genetic markers in additon to their diet and lifestyle.

There is also another study where it called the blue zones, island off costa rica, sardinia , okinara and those people also live past 100 with a diet rich in vegetables fruits and fiber.

Obviously no one wants a heart attack, stroke or cancer and the correlation betwen meat and saturated fat is a factor to consider. The information is on the internet.


enigma


Mar 12, 2011, 4:26 PM
Post #275 of 509 (3809 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [robx] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robx wrote:
I don't really want to read this whole thread, but my personal thoughts are...
I feel like as a society we've moved past the point where killing animals is necessary in keeping us healthy and alive. If you feel that your happiness is more important than animals' lives then that's fine, but it's not for me.
I really really REALLY don't care about how much healthier someone that eats meat is going to be than me, because for me it's completely a moral issue.
I haven't consumed animal products in 5 years, and I'm doing fine. Is there a chance I'm less healthy than someone who is very aware of their diet? probably. But compared to most fast-food eating americans, I think I'm doing just fine.

Very True and Very Moral. In fact later on the thread I have studies from the blue zone areas such as Costa Rica, Okinara, Ikaria, Sardina. and the Nicola Pennisula and they consume a largely vegen diet. The life over 100

More Recently The New England Journal of Medicine published a study with centurians where 77% of the people would live to 100 based on their genome , genetic markers. Included are genes for resilence, as well as diet plays a part.

Both of these research studies are on line google living in blue zones. and New England Journal of Medicine living centurians and you can read the research for yourself.

The most important part is you will unlikely suffer from a heart attack from meat or cancer from saturated fat and poor diet. Stay healthy Smile


blueeyedclimber


Mar 12, 2011, 4:48 PM
Post #276 of 509 (4079 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Very True and Very Moral. In fact later on the thread I have studies from the blue zone areas such as Costa Rica, Okinara, Ikaria, Sardina. and the Nicola Pennisula and they consume a largely vegen diet. The life over 100

More Recently The New England Journal of Medicine published a study with centurians where 77% of the people would live to 100 based on their genome , genetic markers. Included are genes for resilence, as well as diet plays a part.

Both of these research studies are on line google living in blue zones. and New England Journal of Medicine living centurians and you can read the research for yourself.

The most important part is you will unlikely suffer from a heart attack from meat or cancer from saturated fat and poor diet. Stay healthy Smile

Enigma, You do not have to post information about the blue zones and the New England study to EVERYONE that posts. People can read.

And once again, the word is CENTENARIANS, meaning people who live to 100+ years.

This is a centurian.



Josh


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 5:56 PM
Post #277 of 509 (4061 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidants. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 13, 2011, 7:41 AM)


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 6:09 PM
Post #278 of 509 (4052 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
More Recently The New England Journal of Medicine published a study with centurians where 77% of the people would live to 100 based on their genome . . .

Every time you mention this study (how many times is it now? 6?), your description of it drifts a little further from reality. First of all, the journal was Science, not the NEJM. Secondly, the subjects are centenarians, people over the age of 100; not centurians, which, when spelled with an "o" in place of the "a," were ancient Roman military commanders. Finally, 100% of the subjects in the study are classified as centenarians. The 77% figure comes from a model that the researchers developed from which they can predict with 77% accuracy whether a randomly selected individual from a sample of centenarians versus younger controls was in the centenarian group or not, based on the individual's genome.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 12, 2011, 6:12 PM)


Partner macherry


Mar 12, 2011, 6:38 PM
Post #279 of 509 (4037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.

So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?

i don't believe this is necessarily true. i'd have to do a little research. but i do remember reading that women from japan have a lower incidence of breast cancer and they do eat more soy products


kachoong


Mar 12, 2011, 6:42 PM
Post #280 of 509 (4042 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

I like to use macadamia nut oil, mostly in salads. It does have a fairly high smoke point, being fairly stable for oils in general, but I prefer to saute (if I have to) with canola. It does however have a saturated fat content of about 15% or so, but that's not too bad for a nut. It's also a nice change in taste to oilve oil... I like to switch them out depending on the meal. It also has a good shelf life and is also very low in omega-6, which are those fatty acids that cause rancidity (only 0.5g in 1/4 cup), and are common in nuts.


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 7:24 PM
Post #281 of 509 (4028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.

So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?

i don't believe this is necessarily true. i'd have to do a little research. but i do remember reading that women from japan have a lower incidence of breast cancer and they do eat more soy products

Japanese women do have a lower incidence of breast cancer than American women, but that doesn't mean that it's due to soy consumption, and even if it is, that doesn't mean that if American women eat more soy in adulthood that that will lower their breast cancer risk. The best evidence, which is still pretty weak, is that consumption of soy early in life reduces breast cancer risk later.

Jay


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 7:33 PM
Post #282 of 509 (4023 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.

We've already cleared up this misconception. The incidence of salmonella in eggs is on the order of 1 in 10,000. The "6 in 10" figure that you heard is most likely the flock incidence; that is, the proportion of chicken coops in which salmonella is present (or was at the time that this statistic was promulgated—I suspect it is lower now). For whatever reason, the presence of salmonella in the flock is not sufficient to produce salmonella-contaminated eggs.

And, as I also said before, as long as you thoroughly cook your eggs and wash your hands and any utensils and cooking surfaces that came into contact with uncooked eggs, you will not contract salmonella, even if the egg was contaminated.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 12, 2011, 11:30 PM)


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 7:48 PM
Post #283 of 509 (4019 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [kachoong] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

I like to use macadamia nut oil, mostly in salads. It does have a fairly high smoke point, being fairly stable for oils in general, but I prefer to saute (if I have to) with canola. It does however have a saturated fat content of about 15% or so, but that's not too bad for a nut.

FYI, studies of macadamia nuts have shown that they have no effect on serum cholesterol levels—they are the only nut I am aware of that does not have a cholesterol-lowering effect.

In reply to:
It also has a good shelf life and is also very low in omega-6, which are those fatty acids that cause rancidity . . .

Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay


Rufsen


Mar 12, 2011, 7:59 PM
Post #284 of 509 (4010 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay

No. It depends on the number of double bonds on the alkyl-chain, not the position of the double bonds. More double bonds increases the risk of oxidation, and production of acetones, ketones etc.

By the way. Whats your opinion on long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids like EPA, DHA in the diet.


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 8:39 PM
Post #285 of 509 (4000 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Rufsen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay

No. It depends on the number of double bonds on the alkyl-chain, not the position of the double bonds. More double bonds increases the risk of oxidation, and production of acetones, ketones etc.

So, you are agreeing with me that omega-3s should be less stable than omega-6s, right? Also, clearly the position of double bonds in a molecule affects the stability of the molecule.

In reply to:
By the way. Whats your opinion on long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids like EPA, DHA in the diet.

They're important, and most of us don't consume enough of them.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 13, 2011, 7:45 AM)


milesenoell


Mar 12, 2011, 9:06 PM
Post #286 of 509 (3992 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

Switching in corn oil instead of canola oil for health concerns? That strikes me as totally backward.


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 9:10 PM
Post #287 of 509 (3989 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [milesenoell] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

Switching in corn oil instead of canola oil for health concerns? That strikes me as totally backward.

Yes, hence the term "irrational."

Jay


milesenoell


Mar 12, 2011, 9:11 PM
Post #288 of 509 (3987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.

So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?

i don't believe this is necessarily true. i'd have to do a little research. but i do remember reading that women from japan have a lower incidence of breast cancer and they do eat more soy products

Japanese women do have a lower incidence of breast cancer than American women, but that doesn't mean that it's due to soy consumption, and even if it is, that doesn't mean that if American women eat more soy in adulthood that that will lower their breast cancer risk. The best evidence, which is still pretty weak, is that consumption of soy early in life reduces breast cancer risk later.

Jay

Considering that soy is not only one of the most prevalent GMO products, but also one of the first GMO foods to hit the market, I see GMO/natural status as a potentially significant factor in examining the links between soy consumption and health outcomes.


Rufsen


Mar 12, 2011, 9:46 PM
Post #289 of 509 (3974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay

No. It depends on the number of double bonds on the alkyl-chain, not the position of the double bonds. More double bonds increases the risk of oxidation, and production of acetones, ketones etc.

So, you are agreeing with me that omega-3s should be less stable than omega-6s, right? Also, clearly the position of double bonds in a molecule effects the stability of a molecule.

Jay

Yes, omega-3 would be less stable since they have more double bonds. Im not sure how the position would affect stability in this situation.

I tried to see if i could find some data comparing the oxidation rate of a-Linolenic acid and Arachidonic acid, but i failed miserably.


(This post was edited by Rufsen on Mar 12, 2011, 9:47 PM)


jt512


Mar 12, 2011, 9:59 PM
Post #290 of 509 (3966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Rufsen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay

No. It depends on the number of double bonds on the alkyl-chain, not the position of the double bonds. More double bonds increases the risk of oxidation, and production of acetones, ketones etc.

So, you are agreeing with me that omega-3s should be less stable than omega-6s, right? Also, clearly the position of double bonds in a molecule effects the stability of a molecule.

Jay

Yes, omega-3 would be less stable since they have more double bonds. Im not sure how the position would affect stability in this situation.

My very limited understanding is that if the double bonds aren't conjugated, then the further apart they are the more stable the molecule is, so the —C=C—C—C=C— pattern in polyunsaturated fatty acids, where the double bonds are separated by exactly two single bonds, is the least stable pattern. And this, I think, is why polyunsaturated fatty acids are so much less stable than monounsaturated fatty acids: it's not just that they have more double bonds, but that their pattern is particularly destabilizing.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 12, 2011, 10:07 PM)


Rufsen


Mar 12, 2011, 10:12 PM
Post #291 of 509 (3958 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Is it true that omega-6 fatty acids are more susceptible to rancidity than omega-3's? Based on the little bit of organic chemistry I know, I would predict the opposite.

Jay

No. It depends on the number of double bonds on the alkyl-chain, not the position of the double bonds. More double bonds increases the risk of oxidation, and production of acetones, ketones etc.

So, you are agreeing with me that omega-3s should be less stable than omega-6s, right? Also, clearly the position of double bonds in a molecule effects the stability of a molecule.

Jay

Yes, omega-3 would be less stable since they have more double bonds. Im not sure how the position would affect stability in this situation.

My very limited understanding is that if the double bonds aren't conjugated, then the further apart they are the more stable the molecule is, so the —C=C—C—C=C— pattern in polyunsaturated fatty acids, where the double bonds are separated by exactly two single bonds, is the least stable pattern. And this, I think, is why polyunsaturated fatty acids are so much less stable than monounsaturated fatty acids: it's not just that they have more double bonds, but that their pattern is particularly destabilizing.

Jay

Ah, i misunderstood what you meant by position. The non-conjungated double bonds are weaker than the conjungated.

I thought you meant that a non-conjugated n-3 double bond would be weaker than one in the n-6 position.


Partner macherry


Mar 12, 2011, 10:20 PM
Post #292 of 509 (3954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.

So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?

i don't believe this is necessarily true. i'd have to do a little research. but i do remember reading that women from japan have a lower incidence of breast cancer and they do eat more soy products

Japanese women do have a lower incidence of breast cancer than American women, but that doesn't mean that it's due to soy consumption, and even if it is, that doesn't mean that if American women eat more soy in adulthood that that will lower their breast cancer risk. The best evidence, which is still pretty weak, is that consumption of soy early in life reduces breast cancer risk later.

Jay

i should have been more clear, i didn't mean to imply that eating soy lead to lower rates of breast cancer among japanese, i meant that i did not believe there was proven link between soy consumption and breast cancer.

i'd also like to point out to enigma that soy is used as a filler in many processed foods. you can't necessarily avoid it just by taking tofu out of your diet.


marc801


Mar 12, 2011, 10:48 PM
Post #293 of 509 (3945 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh.
If it's caught out at sea in deep water, it's flash-frozen on board. Very little fish anywhere is actually "fresh" as in never having been frozen. And all sushi in the US (with a couple of exceptions) must be held frozen for a prescribed length of time to kill off possible parasites. From the FDA website:
"Freezing and storing at -4°F (-20°C) or below for 7 days (total time),

or freezing at -31°F (-35°C) or below until solid and storing at -31°F (-35°C) or below for 15 hours,

or freezing at -31°F (-35°C) or below until solid and storing at -4°F (-20°C) or below for 24 hours

is sufficient to kill parasites. FDA's Food Code recommends these freezing conditions to retailers who provide fish intended for raw consumption."

enigma wrote:
...I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish.
If it's not fish, then what is it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solea_solea

In reply to:
The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.
This is illegal. All fish sold in this country must have a country of origin label.
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/COOL

enigma wrote:
I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
That statement is blatantly false.

In reply to:
Egg Industry Statement Regarding Egg Safety
WASHINGTON, June 30 1999

``The chance of encountering an egg contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is very small and the possibility of becoming ill from (SE) can be eliminated completely with proper handling and cooking,'' according to Jill Snowdon, Ph.D., director of food safety for the American Egg Board's Egg Nutrition Center. Based on calculations from the 1998 USDA Salmonella Risk Assessment Report, one egg per 20,000 is contaminated with SE (.005%). According to John Mason, D.V.M., M.P.H., the former director of the USDA Salmonella Enteritidis Control Program,

``Based on USDA's statistics, the average consumer would encounter a contaminated egg only once in 42 years. And then, that egg would have to be time and temperature abused to contribute to a health problem.'' The risk of contracting egg-related Salmonella is extremely low for healthy individuals, according to Dr. Mason. ``There is one outbreak for every one billion eggs consumed,'' he said.

Also: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ophs/risk/

enigma wrote:
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.
What do you mean by associated? That it causes breast cancer or that it prevents it? There have been far too few studies and far too inconclusive to make any sort of assessment.
http://breastcancer.about.com/...il/a/soy_bc_diet.htm

Perhaps you could do some research before making unsubstantiated claims.


hafilax


Mar 13, 2011, 12:17 AM
Post #294 of 509 (3933 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

Switching in corn oil instead of canola oil for health concerns? That strikes me as totally backward.

Yes, hence the term "irrational."

Jay
Canola is a little strange and somewhat unique in the oils. It comes from the seeds of the rapeseed plant which is poisonous. They somehow genetically modified it so that the poisonous part can be removed. By the numbers it seems relatively healthy.

Olive oil is definitely the best of the unheated oils. Depending on the specific olive oil used it can become pretty unstable when heated to frying temperatures. Not all olive oils are equal.

If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 2:04 AM
Post #295 of 509 (3915 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.

And you should be afraid of saturated fat.

Jay


spikeddem


Mar 13, 2011, 2:23 AM
Post #296 of 509 (3906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

This thread is starting to make me feel bad about my diet. I may have to fix some things.


hafilax


Mar 13, 2011, 2:35 AM
Post #297 of 509 (3900 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.

And you should be afraid of saturated fat.

Jay
You need some saturated fat in your diet don't you?


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 3:05 AM
Post #298 of 509 (3888 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.

And you should be afraid of saturated fat.

Jay
You need some saturated fat in your diet don't you?

No. None whatsoever.

Jay


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 3:26 AM
Post #299 of 509 (3880 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:

In reply to:
Egg Industry Statement Regarding Egg Safety
WASHINGTON, June 30 1999

``The chance of encountering an egg contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is very small and the possibility of becoming ill from (SE) can be eliminated completely with proper handling and cooking,'' according to Jill Snowdon, Ph.D., director of food safety for the American Egg Board's Egg Nutrition Center. Based on calculations from the 1998 USDA Salmonella Risk Assessment Report, one egg per 20,000 is contaminated with SE (.005%). According to John Mason, D.V.M., M.P.H., the former director of the USDA Salmonella Enteritidis Control Program,

``Based on USDA's statistics, the average consumer would encounter a contaminated egg only once in 42 years. And then, that egg would have to be time and temperature abused to contribute to a health problem.''

I don't know abut the "average consumer," but I think that these statistics argue for caution in handling eggs. Assume that the USDA estimate is correct: 1 egg per 20,000 is contaminated with salmonella. Then, if you eat two eggs a day, your chances of encountering a contaminated egg are 5% after a year and a half, 10% after three years, 25% after 8 years, 50% after 19 years, and 75% after 38 years. Assuming that you cook these eggs properly, and wash your hands after cracking open the raw eggs to cook them, no problem; but if you are a raw food wacko or you aren't careful about washing your hands after handling the eggs, then you have a better than 50:50 chance of being exposed to salmonella in your lifetime from a contaminated egg. I don't know what that means in terms of actually contracting salmonella—presumably not everyone who is exposed gets sick—but it argues for caution.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 13, 2011, 5:21 AM)


marc801


Mar 13, 2011, 5:15 AM
Post #300 of 509 (4633 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
marc801 wrote:

In reply to:
Egg Industry Statement Regarding Egg Safety
WASHINGTON, June 30 1999

``The chance of encountering an egg contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is very small and the possibility of becoming ill from (SE) can be eliminated completely with proper handling and cooking,'' according to Jill Snowdon, Ph.D., director of food safety for the American Egg Board's Egg Nutrition Center. Based on calculations from the 1998 USDA Salmonella Risk Assessment Report, one egg per 20,000 is contaminated with SE (.005%). According to John Mason, D.V.M., M.P.H., the former director of the USDA Salmonella Enteritidis Control Program,

``Based on USDA's statistics, the average consumer would encounter a contaminated egg only once in 42 years. And then, that egg would have to be time and temperature abused to contribute to a health problem.''

I don't know abut the "average consumer," but I think that these statistics argue for caution in handling eggs. Assuming 1 egg per 20,000 is contaminated with salmonella, then if you eat two eggs a day, your chances of encountering a contaminated egg are 5% after a year and a half, 10% after three years, 25% after 8 years, 50% after 19 years, and 75% after 38 years. Assuming that you cook these eggs properly, and wash your hands after cracking open the raw eggs to cook them, no problem; but if you are raw a food nut, or aren't careful about washing your hands after handling the eggs, you have a better than 50:50 chance of being exposed to salmonella in your lifetime from a contaminated egg. I don't know what that means in terms of actually contracting salmonella; presumably not everyone who is exposed gets sick.
Your statistical analysis is correct, but look at what I emphasized. If you're healthy and you follow proper kitchen cleanliness protocol, it's pretty damned unlikely you'll become sick.


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 5:26 AM
Post #301 of 509 (4803 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
marc801 wrote:

In reply to:
Egg Industry Statement Regarding Egg Safety
WASHINGTON, June 30 1999

``The chance of encountering an egg contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is very small and the possibility of becoming ill from (SE) can be eliminated completely with proper handling and cooking,'' according to Jill Snowdon, Ph.D., director of food safety for the American Egg Board's Egg Nutrition Center. Based on calculations from the 1998 USDA Salmonella Risk Assessment Report, one egg per 20,000 is contaminated with SE (.005%). According to John Mason, D.V.M., M.P.H., the former director of the USDA Salmonella Enteritidis Control Program,

``Based on USDA's statistics, the average consumer would encounter a contaminated egg only once in 42 years. And then, that egg would have to be time and temperature abused to contribute to a health problem.''

I don't know abut the "average consumer," but I think that these statistics argue for caution in handling eggs. Assuming 1 egg per 20,000 is contaminated with salmonella, then if you eat two eggs a day, your chances of encountering a contaminated egg are 5% after a year and a half, 10% after three years, 25% after 8 years, 50% after 19 years, and 75% after 38 years. Assuming that you cook these eggs properly, and wash your hands after cracking open the raw eggs to cook them, no problem; but if you are raw a food nut, or aren't careful about washing your hands after handling the eggs, you have a better than 50:50 chance of being exposed to salmonella in your lifetime from a contaminated egg. I don't know what that means in terms of actually contracting salmonella; presumably not everyone who is exposed gets sick.
Your statistical analysis is correct, but look at what I emphasized. If you're healthy and you follow proper kitchen cleanliness protocol, it's pretty damned unlikely you'll become sick.

OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?

Jay


marc801


Mar 13, 2011, 5:32 AM
Post #302 of 509 (4799 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 5:48 AM
Post #303 of 509 (4798 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

That's vague. Seriously, if you have data on the infectivity and virulence of salmonella, I'd like to look at it.

Jay


shockabuku


Mar 13, 2011, 6:01 AM
Post #304 of 509 (4790 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


marc801


Mar 13, 2011, 6:06 AM
Post #305 of 509 (4787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
That's vague. Seriously, if you have data on the infectivity and virulence of salmonella, I'd like to look at it.
It all depends on the strain. I recall from food science days that there are over 2000 strains of samonella and under 0.5% are considered dangerous. I have no data. That research is left as an exercise for the reader.


marc801


Mar 13, 2011, 6:09 AM
Post #306 of 509 (4785 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [shockabuku] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 6:22 AM
Post #307 of 509 (4777 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
That's vague. Seriously, if you have data on the infectivity and virulence of salmonella, I'd like to look at it.
It all depends on the strain. I recall from food science days that there are over 2000 strains of samonella and under 0.5% are considered dangerous. I have no data. That research is left as an exercise for the reader.

Except that "left as an exercise for the reader" implies that the author knows the answer, not that the author is making a claim he can't support.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 13, 2011, 6:41 AM)


shockabuku


Mar 13, 2011, 6:29 AM
Post #308 of 509 (4771 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.


enigma


Mar 13, 2011, 8:45 AM
Post #309 of 509 (4745 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [shockabuku] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.



BREITBART- WASHINGTON ASSOCIATED PRESS
AUGUST 10 2010

2000 Cases Reported -Christopher Braden-Epidemoligist- Federal Center of Disease Control
This form of salmonella is tied to outbreak can be passed from chickens that appear healthy grows inside egg not just on shell/
1/2 billion eggs recalled Iowa Hillandale Farms connected earlier this week
Wright County Farm 380 million recalled
14 states
cases often go undetected due to people not going to doctors and hospitals to get stool samples.
Estimates cases of poisoning may be 30 times higher than reported-FDA /CDC


marc801


Mar 13, 2011, 1:01 PM
Post #310 of 509 (4728 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Except that "left as an exercise for the reader" implies that the author knows the answer, not that the author is making a claim he can't support.
Like I said, I don't have data or citations - just what I recall from my days as a food scientist.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 13, 2011, 5:23 PM
Post #311 of 509 (4711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.



BREITBART- WASHINGTON ASSOCIATED PRESS
AUGUST 10 2010

2000 Cases Reported -Christopher Braden-Epidemoligist- Federal Center of Disease Control
This form of salmonella is tied to outbreak can be passed from chickens that appear healthy grows inside egg not just on shell/
1/2 billion eggs recalled Iowa Hillandale Farms connected earlier this week
Wright County Farm 380 million recalled
14 states
cases often go undetected due to people not going to doctors and hospitals to get stool samples.
Estimates cases of poisoning may be 30 times higher than reported-FDA /CDC

Have you also cut tomatoes, celery, spinach, and peanut butter out of your diet?


redrattie


Mar 13, 2011, 5:23 PM
Post #312 of 509 (4711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 35

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

Switching in corn oil instead of canola oil for health concerns? That strikes me as totally backward.

Yes, hence the term "irrational."

Jay
Canola is a little strange and somewhat unique in the oils. It comes from the seeds of the rapeseed plant which is poisonous. They somehow genetically modified it so that the poisonous part can be removed. By the numbers it seems relatively healthy.

Olive oil is definitely the best of the unheated oils. Depending on the specific olive oil used it can become pretty unstable when heated to frying temperatures. Not all olive oils are equal.

If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)


jt512


Mar 13, 2011, 5:38 PM
Post #313 of 509 (4703 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay


redrattie


Mar 13, 2011, 5:58 PM
Post #314 of 509 (4696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 35

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

It was a serious question. I have hereditary fructose intolerance and the list of "sugars" I must avoid is quite long. I don't eat coconut and not sure how much, if any fructose it contains, nor do I know how much fructose remains in the different types of oils after processing. (and yes, duh, technically, I do eat some naturally occurring sugars, so you get a Wink for catching that.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 13, 2011, 10:13 PM
Post #315 of 509 (4664 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:
hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
milesenoell wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Out of curiosity, and separately from this discussion, anyone know how much better olive oil is over butter?

I'd say infinitely better. Olive oil is a monounsaturated fat rich in antioxidants. Butter is high in saturated fat, and poor in antioxidant. There's no comparison. I haven't had a stick of butter in my house for at least 25 years. If it were up to me the only oils I'd use would be olive and canola, the latter providing omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately, my girlfriend has an irrational suspicion of canola oil, so we use some Mazola "Corn Plus" oil, which is a blend of corn and canola oils.

Jay

Switching in corn oil instead of canola oil for health concerns? That strikes me as totally backward.

Yes, hence the term "irrational."

Jay
Canola is a little strange and somewhat unique in the oils. It comes from the seeds of the rapeseed plant which is poisonous. They somehow genetically modified it so that the poisonous part can be removed. By the numbers it seems relatively healthy.

Olive oil is definitely the best of the unheated oils. Depending on the specific olive oil used it can become pretty unstable when heated to frying temperatures. Not all olive oils are equal.

If you're not afraid of saturated fat then coconut oil is one of the more stable frying oils since saturated fats are more temperature stable. It is also pretty flavourless.

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

You don't eat fruit?


jt512


Mar 14, 2011, 3:43 AM
Post #316 of 509 (4630 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay


redrattie


Mar 14, 2011, 5:39 AM
Post #317 of 509 (4605 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 35

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay

Damn, had I known what Paleo was, I would have laughed with you, and then asked the serious question a couple posts later.

Thanks for the info on the oil. I've been a vegetarian for 20+ years and the only thing separating me from becoming vegan is the butter. What bothers me more than butter is all the high fructose corn syrup being added to products that never used to be there. I now make most of my meals from scratch and have stopped eating out since what used to be safe food, no longer is with all that added sugar.


jt512


Mar 14, 2011, 6:29 AM
Post #318 of 509 (4595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay

Damn, had I known what Paleo was, I would have laughed with you, and then asked the serious question a couple posts later.

Thanks for the info on the oil. I've been a vegetarian for 20+ years and the only thing separating me from becoming vegan is the butter. What bothers me more than butter is all the high fructose corn syrup being added to products that never used to be there. I now make most of my meals from scratch and have stopped eating out since what used to be safe food, no longer is with all that added sugar.

You probably should be concerned about saturated fat intake. Saturated fat increases serum cholesterol, which increases the risk of heart disease.

Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

As to my comment about sugars being insoluble in fats, I hope I wasn't being to glib. In theory, everything is soluble in everything to some extent. So even though sugars are considered to be insoluble in fats, if coconuts contain fructose, then there could be trace amounts of fructose in coconut oil. I would think that the concentration would be too low to be of concern, but perhaps you should contact a dietitian or physician to be certain.

Jay


Greggle


Mar 14, 2011, 7:36 AM
Post #319 of 509 (4584 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 27, 2010
Posts: 228

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?

Jay

Jay, I'm genuinely curious. How do you crack your eggs?


enigma


Mar 14, 2011, 8:57 AM
Post #320 of 509 (4574 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
enigma wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.



BREITBART- WASHINGTON ASSOCIATED PRESS
AUGUST 10 2010

2000 Cases Reported -Christopher Braden-Epidemoligist- Federal Center of Disease Control
This form of salmonella is tied to outbreak can be passed from chickens that appear healthy grows inside egg not just on shell/
1/2 billion eggs recalled Iowa Hillandale Farms connected earlier this week
Wright County Farm 380 million recalled
14 states
cases often go undetected due to people not going to doctors and hospitals to get stool samples.
Estimates cases of poisoning may be 30 times higher than reported-FDA /CDC

Have you also cut tomatoes, celery, spinach, and peanut butter out of your diet?


The best thing to do is to make a garden and grow your own vegetables organically. A friend of mine grows vegetables in his back yard. So I get them from him. I have also grown my own in a garden.
You live in Nebraska, there must be alot of farm land available. I've been there as well
Fruits can be put in jars and stored. My mother used to make homemade jam.
You can buy peanuts with the shell or almonds and its they are easy to grind.
When I was a child I use to make peanut butter with a little grinder they make for children. Kids love to make their own peanut butter. Tongue
Or go to a market where it is made fresh, they usually have peanut , almond and cashew butter. It tastes excellent.
Health and financially its makes a lot of sense to grow as much vegetables and fruits as you need.


enigma


Mar 14, 2011, 9:06 AM
Post #321 of 509 (4569 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay

Damn, had I known what Paleo was, I would have laughed with you, and then asked the serious question a couple posts later.

Thanks for the info on the oil. I've been a vegetarian for 20+ years and the only thing separating me from becoming vegan is the butter. What bothers me more than butter is all the high fructose corn syrup being added to products that never used to be there. I now make most of my meals from scratch and have stopped eating out since what used to be safe food, no longer is with all that added sugar.

That's great, do you have an organic garden? Perhaps you can share with us what you do eat and where you get the food from?
Is there a food coop near you that is organic?
How is your health? Climbing? Thanks


enigma


Mar 14, 2011, 9:20 AM
Post #322 of 509 (4563 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
enigma wrote:
wonderwoman wrote:
kaizen wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I eat a lot of fish, which is one of the healthiest things one can eat.
Angelic

While I agree that fish is really healthy and tasty, be careful not to eat tuna, swordfish, and other large fish species with great regularity. Courtesy of bioaccumulation, they can contain a ton of mercury, which can really fuck you up. Jeremy Piven is a good example.

Not to mention that farm raised fish have higher levels of dioxins & other toxicants due to their 'feed'. They really only warn pregnant women / women of childbearing age & children about the Hg levels in predator fish due to potentially harming brain development. But you're right. Mercury isn't really good for anybody.

Yes it is very difficult on the west coast to get wild fish thats not farm raised. There is so much better fish in the east coast and its fresh. I won't eat farmed either.
I do occasionally get salmon and once and a wild I find dover sole from the east coast but it isn't fish. The sell alot of fish from Vietnam , Mexico, and alot of times they say they don't know where its from.

I stopped eating eggs due to that 6 in 10 eggs have salmonella in them.
I was trying to eat more tofu, but I heard its been associated with breast cancer as well.

So what do you eat? How do you get your protein?

i don't believe this is necessarily true. i'd have to do a little research. but i do remember reading that women from japan have a lower incidence of breast cancer and they do eat more soy products

When I was doing a little research in reference to soy I believe the correlation changes in breast cancer when women are older.
Or you can look on line its published.
There are alot of different soy, some are organic, sprouted etc.
I have met people who grow their own soybeans and make soy products which may be healthier.


I did see it!


dr_feelgood


Mar 14, 2011, 3:13 PM
Post #323 of 509 (4534 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [shockabuku] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


It's a great weigh loss plan.


Partner camhead


Mar 14, 2011, 3:16 PM
Post #324 of 509 (4532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


It's a great weigh loss plan.

Yeah, and the vomiting really builds SICK core strength.


shockabuku


Mar 14, 2011, 3:23 PM
Post #325 of 509 (4233 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


It's a great weigh loss plan.

Effective, yes; great, not so much.

For a couple of days after admission to the hospital they didn't know what I had. Raging fever, puking and shitting out anything other than small amounts of water I took in. This was in basic training where no one knew me and my family was multiple states away. Mid 80s. They actually thought I had AIDS for a day or so and put me in isolation. Then the hospital administration chewed me out for telling my parents (over the phone) that I had other than an upper respiratory infection.


saint_john


Mar 14, 2011, 3:26 PM
Post #326 of 509 (4298 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i used to eat eggs with a vengance (vegan now). I'd eat 2 or 3 for breakfast and have at least one hardboiled egg during the day. I'd eat raw and "runny" eggs on a regular basis as well. Not once did I ever get sick from it.


Partner cracklover


Mar 14, 2011, 3:33 PM
Post #327 of 509 (4295 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
<Her usual silly half-baked nonsense>

Perhaps you could do some research before making unsubstantiated claims.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

That's a good one! And I wish my cat would do something useful around the house, like help with the laundry.

It is a nice thought, though.

GO


marc801


Mar 14, 2011, 4:51 PM
Post #328 of 509 (4265 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
i used to eat eggs with a vengance...
I'm trying to envision that..... Wink

"I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals - I'm a vegetarian 'cause I hate plants."




Partner epoch
Moderator

Mar 14, 2011, 4:55 PM
Post #329 of 509 (4261 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.


saint_john


Mar 14, 2011, 4:56 PM
Post #330 of 509 (4259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i used to eat eggs with a vengance...
I'm trying to envision that..... Wink

if you'd have seen me manically breaking and cooking eggs as I rushed to get ready for work in the morning you'd understand. Sly


gmggg


Mar 14, 2011, 5:00 PM
Post #331 of 509 (4251 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.

This is very true. I was raised as a vegan. But then bacon called.


marc801


Mar 14, 2011, 5:10 PM
Post #332 of 509 (4247 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Thanks , I haven't had meat or chicken,lamb. ham etc for 9 years . I pretty much know its unhealthy due to the antibotics, high fat, hormones and on top of that I have found scientic research that bears this out.
Meat that is certified organic doesn't have antibiotics or added hormones.


saint_john


Mar 14, 2011, 5:15 PM
Post #333 of 509 (4241 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.

i don't miss beef or poultry at all. Pig, on the other hand, has been tough to give up.
I used to dry rub a pork shoulder and then roast it for 10 hours in the oven. my god, it was like greasy heaven.


saint_john


Mar 14, 2011, 5:19 PM
Post #334 of 509 (4239 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

MUST... STAY... STRONG... Crazy


marc801


Mar 14, 2011, 5:26 PM
Post #335 of 509 (4232 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
MUST... STAY... STRONG... Crazy



Pork belly in clay pot recipe:
http://www.ming.com/...k-Belly-Clay-Pot.htm


saint_john


Mar 14, 2011, 5:31 PM
Post #336 of 509 (4225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

pork belly is amazing. my city is known for pork and we have some chefs in town that are doing wonderful things with it.


jt512


Mar 14, 2011, 6:03 PM
Post #337 of 509 (4210 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Greggle] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Greggle wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?

Jay

Jay, I'm genuinely curious. How do you crack your eggs?

I knock them on something. Why?

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 14, 2011, 6:04 PM)


marc801


Mar 14, 2011, 6:08 PM
Post #338 of 509 (4204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Greggle wrote:
Jay, I'm genuinely curious. How do you crack your eggs?

I knock them on something. Is there some other way?
Lasers?
Stare at them intently with a baleful gaze?


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:30 AM
Post #339 of 509 (4154 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.

i don't miss beef or poultry at all. Pig, on the other hand, has been tough to give up.
I used to dry rub a pork shoulder and then roast it for 10 hours in the oven. my god, it was like greasy heaven.

yes it was tasty yesterday
not so much when now when you know

There is always MorningStar Fake Bacon
It tastes pretty good and it gets crispy. You could eat it with an egg subsitute.

They also have these spicy black bean patties, you can put some soy cheese and salsa. Then you put it crumbled up on top of salad. Yum

Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 15, 2011, 9:33 AM)


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:36 AM
Post #340 of 509 (4152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [happiegrrrl] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
I eat sugar, drink coffee, eat meat... And I am pretty sure that giving up on all those won't get me climbing harder.

To choose a diet ONLY to climb harder seems to go against any traditionalist views, I think. Gotta be a sport climber thang!

I drink coffee with soy milk or black if its fresh and good.


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:40 AM
Post #341 of 509 (4150 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.


They say its the hardest and usually the last thing vegetarians give up.

However its impossible to go back. I believe you loose the enzymes to digest meat after awhile.


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:43 AM
Post #342 of 509 (4148 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.

This is very true. I was raised as a vegan. But then bacon called.


That's quite unusual Shocked


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:46 AM
Post #343 of 509 (4144 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks , I haven't had meat or chicken,lamb. ham etc for 9 years . I pretty much know its unhealthy due to the antibotics, high fat, hormones and on top of that I have found scientic research that bears this out.
Meat that is certified organic doesn't have antibiotics or added hormones.

That's what they say. meat eaters have 25%-50% ,more likely to get cancer.
Not to mention E-coli.


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 9:50 AM
Post #344 of 509 (4143 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [shockabuku] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


It's a great weigh loss plan.

Effective, yes; great, not so much.

For a couple of days after admission to the hospital they didn't know what I had. Raging fever, puking and shitting out anything other than small amounts of water I took in. This was in basic training where no one knew me and my family was multiple states away. Mid 80s. They actually thought I had AIDS for a day or so and put me in isolation. Then the hospital administration chewed me out for telling my parents (over the phone) that I had other than an upper respiratory infection.

That sounds awful. I have heard that you can't tell your parents in basic training anything but a scripted letter.
So how long did you suffer from salmonella?
Did others that ate eggs with you get it too?


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 10:04 AM
Post #345 of 509 (4137 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.


Cracklover does this experience of shockabuku from salmonella sound silly?

Or the report from August 10 2010 from the Christopher Braden CDC



BREITBART- WASHINGTON ASSOCIATED PRESS
AUGUST 10 2010


2000 Cases Reported -Christopher Braden-Epidemoligist- Federal Center of Disease Control
This form of salmonella
is tied to outbreak can be passed from chickens that appear healthy grows inside egg not just on shell/
1/2 billion eggs recalled Iowa Hillandale Farms connected earlier this week
Wright County Farm 380 million recalled
14 states
cases often go undetected due to people not going to doctors and hospitals to get stool samples.
Estimates cases of poisoning may be 30 times higher than reported-FDA /CDC

perhaps if you get salmonella from eggs you won't feel silly?


enigma


Mar 15, 2011, 10:12 AM
Post #346 of 509 (4136 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
OK, what about if you're healthy and you don't follow "proper kitchen cleanliness protocol," since I don't know anybody but me who does?
Actually, I do as well. Frankly though, salmonella simply isn't all that virulent. It all hinges on how many organisms you get in a single dose. 1000 organisms/ml may have no effect while 100K org/ml has you spending all day in the bathroom.

More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.


It's a great weigh loss plan.

I didn't realize it took a week to recover? that must have been awful. No more raw chocolate chip cookie dough for me. I sometimes have it in frozen yogurt.
Salmonella , Is terrible


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 15, 2011, 10:15 AM)


saint_john


Mar 15, 2011, 1:38 PM
Post #347 of 509 (4116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 15, 2011, 2:05 PM
Post #348 of 509 (4109 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.


Partner macherry


Mar 15, 2011, 2:18 PM
Post #349 of 509 (4107 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.

maple syrup for the win


saint_john


Mar 15, 2011, 2:31 PM
Post #350 of 509 (4155 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.

maple syrup for the win

you can't go wrong with bee vomit or tree secretion.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 15, 2011, 2:31 PM
Post #351 of 509 (3532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.

maple syrup for the win

Tree vampire!!!!


Partner epoch
Moderator

Mar 15, 2011, 3:15 PM
Post #352 of 509 (3526 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
saint_john wrote:
epoch wrote:
Bacon is the gateway meat to become non-vegan.

i don't miss beef or poultry at all. Pig, on the other hand, has been tough to give up.
I used to dry rub a pork shoulder and then roast it for 10 hours in the oven. my god, it was like greasy heaven.

yes it was tasty yesterday
not so much when now when you know

There is always MorningStar Fake Bacon
It tastes pretty good and it gets crispy. You could eat it with an egg subsitute.

They also have these spicy black bean patties, you can put some soy cheese and salsa. Then you put it crumbled up on top of salad. Yum

Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

Get pork belly.
Dip it in molasses.
Place on barbecue.
Cook until done.


Partner epoch
Moderator

Mar 15, 2011, 3:16 PM
Post #353 of 509 (3525 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks , I haven't had meat or chicken,lamb. ham etc for 9 years . I pretty much know its unhealthy due to the antibotics, high fat, hormones and on top of that I have found scientic research that bears this out.
Meat that is certified organic doesn't have antibiotics or added hormones.

That's what they say. meat eaters have 25%-50% ,more likely to get cancer.
Not to mention E-coli.

Your numbers have no merit.


chadnsc


Mar 15, 2011, 3:49 PM
Post #354 of 509 (3515 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
enigma wrote:
marc801 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Thanks , I haven't had meat or chicken,lamb. ham etc for 9 years . I pretty much know its unhealthy due to the antibotics, high fat, hormones and on top of that I have found scientic research that bears this out.
Meat that is certified organic doesn't have antibiotics or added hormones.

That's what they say. meat eaters have 25%-50% ,more likely to get cancer.
Not to mention E-coli.

Your numbers have no merit.

Or basis in fact for that matter. Crazy

Enigma you're talking out of your ass, please stop your breath stinks.


Partner cracklover


Mar 15, 2011, 4:07 PM
Post #355 of 509 (3503 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [macherry] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.

maple syrup for the win

If you're okay with draining the blood from living helpless trees, while they scream their pain to the world, that's fine with me.

GTongue


saint_john


Mar 15, 2011, 4:15 PM
Post #356 of 509 (3496 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jay what's better for you, honey or maple syrup? we're talking real, premium Maple syrup. Not Aunt Jamima crap.


Partner camhead


Mar 15, 2011, 4:18 PM
Post #357 of 509 (3493 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
Jay what's better for you, honey or maple syrup? we're talking real, premium Maple syrup. Not Aunt Jamima crap.

RACIST!


Partner macherry


Mar 15, 2011, 4:31 PM
Post #358 of 509 (3482 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
macherry wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.

The addition of the descicated bee vomit just makes that sound scrumptious.

maple syrup for the win

If you're okay with draining the blood from living helpless trees, while they scream their pain to the world, that's fine with me.

GTongue

they died for my sins


Stoves


Mar 15, 2011, 4:36 PM
Post #359 of 509 (3479 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 75

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Actually Enigma is right.

Keep in mind that 40% of cancer is preventable and 27% of all cancer deaths are attributed to poor diet.


Partner camhead


Mar 15, 2011, 4:52 PM
Post #360 of 509 (3478 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
Actually Enigma is right.

Keep in mind that 40% of cancer is preventable and 27% of all cancer deaths are attributed to poor diet.

As has been stated upthread, it has not yet been determined if it is as simple as "eating meat gives you more likelihood of cancer." As near as I understand it, they are starting to see the culprit more as processed meats, rather than all meat or even all red meat. Earlier studies linking meat to cancer did not distinguish between "fresh" red meats and processed lunch meats, bacons, sausages, etc.


chadnsc


Mar 15, 2011, 4:55 PM
Post #361 of 509 (3475 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
Actually Enigma is right.

Keep in mind that 40% of cancer is preventable and 27% of all cancer deaths are attributed to poor diet.

Actually enigma and you are wrong and the numbers you're stating are inncorrect.


Edit: Damn Cam GU'ed me!


(This post was edited by chadnsc on Mar 15, 2011, 4:56 PM)


shockabuku


Mar 15, 2011, 5:14 PM
Post #362 of 509 (3467 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There's no secrecy surrounding basic training - but there's a lot of stupid bureacrucy associated with any facet of the government that prohibits effective flow of information.

Anyway, I was actively sick for maybe 4 days to a week, then stayed in the hospital for a few more days until I was strong enough to walk around well enough to be discharged.

I think I actually got it from a Chicken ala king MRE. It was the first time I had ever had one and I remember it tasting just horrible; I've tried it since and it's normally not bad. I got sick within a day of eating it. They Army solution was that I didn't wash my hands properly and that there wasn't anything wrong with the food.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 15, 2011, 5:22 PM
Post #363 of 509 (3461 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
Stoves wrote:
Actually Enigma is right.

Keep in mind that 40% of cancer is preventable and 27% of all cancer deaths are attributed to poor diet.

Actually enigma and you are wrong and the numbers you're stating are inncorrect.


Edit: Damn Cam GU'ed me!

Damn, I was looking up the exact numbers and I guess I took too long.

The "poor diet" in the study I saw was shorthand for being obese or having an unbalanced diet. Both of which can be achieved thru vegetarianism if so desired.


jt512


Mar 15, 2011, 5:36 PM
Post #364 of 509 (3454 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
meat eaters have 25%-50% ,more likely to get cancer.

Bullshit.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 15, 2011, 5:36 PM)


jt512


Mar 15, 2011, 5:40 PM
Post #365 of 509 (3450 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
Actually Enigma is right.

No. She's not.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 15, 2011, 5:40 PM)


Stoves


Mar 15, 2011, 6:32 PM
Post #366 of 509 (3437 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 75

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jay do you believe that vegetarians are less likely to get cancer then non vegetarians?


Partner cracklover


Mar 15, 2011, 6:35 PM
Post #367 of 509 (3434 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Stoves wrote:
Actually Enigma is right.

No. She's not.

Jay

Almost sig worthy. It's certainly timeless.

GO


(This post was edited by cracklover on Mar 15, 2011, 6:36 PM)


jt512


Mar 15, 2011, 6:35 PM
Post #368 of 509 (3433 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
Jay do you believe that vegetarians are less likely to get cancer then non vegetarians?

Tough question. Quick answer: probably slightly less likely, due to avoidance of red meat, cured meats, and higher intake of fruits and vegetables.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 15, 2011, 6:36 PM)


Partner camhead


Mar 15, 2011, 6:37 PM
Post #369 of 509 (3425 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Stoves wrote:
Jay do you believe that vegetarians are less likely to get cancer then non vegetarians?

Tough question. Quick answer: probably slightly less likely.

Jay

He's not asking for "probablies." What do you BELIEVE and feel in your gut? Have faith! Your the decider!


Partner macherry


Mar 15, 2011, 6:44 PM
Post #370 of 509 (3422 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Stoves wrote:
Jay do you believe that vegetarians are less likely to get cancer then non vegetarians?

Tough question. Quick answer: probably slightly less likely.

Jay

He's not asking for "probablies." What do you BELIEVE and feel in your gut? Have faith! Your the decider!

wrong forum


Stoves


Mar 15, 2011, 7:10 PM
Post #371 of 509 (3410 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 75

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

So you agree with me that meat eaters are more likely to get cancer, good. However this was a tough question for you. You will be more assured after looking into the link between red meat and stomach cancer.

Now do you think vegetarians are less likely to smoke? Drink? Are they less likely to be fat? ( do you see where I'm going with this?)

if you compare two people that have the same lifestlye and one of them is a veggie and the other is not then of course that saying the meat eater is 25-40% more likely to get cancer is absurd and a lie.

But the truth is that vegetarians have a healthier lifestyle then meat eaters. All those factors combined come to that 25-40%.

Sorry for the lack of elaboration on this I'm mobile at the moment


spikeddem


Mar 15, 2011, 7:13 PM
Post #372 of 509 (3408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
So you agree with me that meat eaters are more likely to get cancer, good. However this was a tough question for you. You will be more assured after looking into the link between red meat and stomach cancer.

Now do you think vegetarians are less likely to smoke? Drink? Are they less likely to be fat? ( do you see where I'm going with this?)

if you compare two people that have the same lifestlye and one of them is a veggie and the other is not then of course that saying the meat eater is 25-40% more likely to get cancer is absurd and a lie.

But the truth is that vegetarians have a healthier lifestyle then meat eaters. All those factors combined come to that 25-40%.

Sorry for the lack of elaboration on this I'm mobile at the moment
It's like reading a male Enigma, except depressed to like ~60% of the non-sense levels of Enigma.


chadnsc


Mar 15, 2011, 7:23 PM
Post #373 of 509 (3399 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
So you agree with me that meat eaters are more likely to get cancer, good. However this was a tough question for you. You will be more assured after looking into the link between red meat and stomach cancer.

Now do you think vegetarians are less likely to smoke? Drink? Are they less likely to be fat? ( do you see where I'm going with this?)

if you compare two people that have the same lifestlye and one of them is a veggie and the other is not then of course that saying the meat eater is 25-40% more likely to get cancer is absurd and a lie.

But the truth is that vegetarians have a healthier lifestyle then meat eaters. All those factors combined come to that 25-40%.
Sorry for the lack of elaboration on this I'm mobile at the moment

Yeah Stoves does sound like enigma, but with better grammar and sentence structure.


Regardless Stoves is still making assumptions and talking out of his ass.


(This post was edited by chadnsc on Mar 15, 2011, 7:27 PM)


Stoves


Mar 15, 2011, 7:28 PM
Post #374 of 509 (3391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 75

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

First you call me stupid, then a troll and now a
male enigma. Sounds like progress. I love you two spike


chadnsc


Mar 15, 2011, 7:29 PM
Post #375 of 509 (3772 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
First you call me stupid, then a troll and now a
male enigma. Sounds like progress. I love you two spike


If you consider that progress than you're a bigger fool than you appear to be.


sp115


Mar 15, 2011, 7:53 PM
Post #376 of 509 (3337 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
First you call me stupid, then a troll and now a
male enigma. Sounds like progress. I love you two spike


FWIW, I don't know any fat, unhealthy, vegetarians. So barring any cited studies, I still understand why you might assume they are healthier as a group.

But as a self-confessed grammar-Nazi, I feel compelled to point out the incorrect usage of the word "two".*








* but I would never call you a "male enigma", that just sounds dirty


Stoves


Mar 15, 2011, 8:13 PM
Post #377 of 509 (3318 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 75

Re: [sp115] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Thanks for the correction I do my best trying to avoid grammar mistakes.


Partner camhead


Mar 15, 2011, 8:15 PM
Post #378 of 509 (3314 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [sp115] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sp115 wrote:

But as a self-confessed grammar-Nazi, I feel compelled to point out the incorrect usage of the word "two".*


Actually, that makes you more of a spelling Nazi than a grammar Nazi.


spikeddem


Mar 15, 2011, 8:15 PM
Post #379 of 509 (3314 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [Stoves] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Stoves wrote:
First you call me stupid, then a troll and now a
male enigma. Sounds like progress. I love you two spike
FWIW, I also claim that enigma is a troll, and have killfiled her accordingly. Although, I don't believe I've ever called you stupid.


sp115


Mar 15, 2011, 8:34 PM
Post #380 of 509 (3303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
sp115 wrote:

But as a self-confessed grammar-Nazi, I feel compelled to point out the incorrect usage of the word "two".*


Actually, that makes you more of a spelling Nazi than a grammar Nazi.

Well, I’ll see your banana, and raise you two coconuts.

“Two” is spelled correctly, which is why I said it was used incorrectly. And since morphology is a subset grammar, I felt it most accurate to describe myself as a grammar-Nazi.


Partner camhead


Mar 15, 2011, 10:22 PM
Post #381 of 509 (3279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [sp115] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sp115 wrote:
camhead wrote:
sp115 wrote:

But as a self-confessed grammar-Nazi, I feel compelled to point out the incorrect usage of the word "two".*


Actually, that makes you more of a spelling Nazi than a grammar Nazi.

Well, I’ll see your banana, and raise you two coconuts.

“Two” is spelled correctly, which is why I said it was used incorrectly. And since morphology is a subset grammar, I felt it most accurate to describe myself as a grammar-Nazi.

No, it was spelled incorrectly. He accidentally used a "w" instead of an "o."


chadnsc


Mar 15, 2011, 11:30 PM
Post #382 of 509 (3258 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
Stoves wrote:
First you call me stupid, then a troll and now a
male enigma. Sounds like progress. I love you two spike
FWIW, I also claim that enigma is a troll, and have killfiled her accordingly. Although, I don't believe I've ever called you stupid.

Well unless someone has taken over enigma's account there are several users who have met the ball-o-crazy in person and vouch for her 'various social disorders'. Tongue

Then again it could all be one elaborate troll with users vouching for her being real when in fact she isn't. Now that would be cool. Cool


sp115


Mar 16, 2011, 2:31 AM
Post #383 of 509 (3228 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
sp115 wrote:
camhead wrote:
sp115 wrote:

But as a self-confessed grammar-Nazi, I feel compelled to point out the incorrect usage of the word "two".*


Actually, that makes you more of a spelling Nazi than a grammar Nazi.

Well, I’ll see your banana, and raise you two coconuts.

“Two” is spelled correctly, which is why I said it was used incorrectly. And since morphology is a subset grammar, I felt it most accurate to describe myself as a grammar-Nazi.

No, it was spelled incorrectly. He accidentally used a "w" instead of an "o."

Ewe Kant bee Sirius?


KeitaroHoshi


Mar 16, 2011, 4:10 AM
Post #384 of 509 (3216 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2010
Posts: 171

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Here is my best recipe.
List of things you need.
4 bundles of collared green leaves(4 plants),
1 pounds of baby carrots,
1 sweet onion,
1 large tomato,
lemon pepper 1 heaping table spoon,
tabasco sauce 2 table spoons,
soy sauce 4 table spoons,
water
vegetable oil

Preparation:
Cut away stems from collareds, cut leaves into 2 inch squares. mix leaves with 1/3 cup vegetable oil.
Dice the tomato 3/4" squares.
Dice the onion 1" squares.

place in a wok and simmer on medium tossing leaves and cook evenly for 15 min.
Add diced tomato, and one pound of baby carrots.
Add 1/2 cup of water.
Toss or stir the leaves, tomato, and carrots for 5 min on medium.
Add tabasco sauce and soy sauce.
Add the onion and cook for 10 min. constantly stirring and tossing so nothing sticks to the bottom of the pot or Wok
more oil may be needed-add in small amounts until desired amount is reached.
Mix in lemon pepper, serve while hot.

Note: every thing can be separately cooked.
You don't want the onions to soft (they get sticky),
You don't want to cook the carrots to long (they get mushy),
You don't want to forget to stir the greens (they can burn and stick to pot).

If you cook every thing just right you will end up with
crisp greens with crisp pan fried carrots and onions
with a hint of spice and tomato.

Note: collared greens can be pungent if you are not used to eating them. The trick to enjoying this dish is to breath the aroma of the vegetables while you chew.
This dish will also help alleviate chest congestion.

EnjoySmile


enigma


Mar 16, 2011, 5:47 AM
Post #385 of 509 (3201 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [KeitaroHoshi] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

KeitaroHoshi wrote:
Here is my best recipe.
List of things you need.
4 bundles of collared green leaves(4 plants),
1 pounds of baby carrots,
1 sweet onion,
1 large tomato,
lemon pepper 1 heaping table spoon,
tabasco sauce 2 table spoons,
soy sauce 4 table spoons,
water
vegetable oil

Preparation:
Cut away stems from collareds, cut leaves into 2 inch squares. mix leaves with 1/3 cup vegetable oil.
Dice the tomato 3/4" squares.
Dice the onion 1" squares.

place in a wok and simmer on medium tossing leaves and cook evenly for 15 min.
Add diced tomato, and one pound of baby carrots.
Add 1/2 cup of water.
Toss or stir the leaves, tomato, and carrots for 5 min on medium.
Add tabasco sauce and soy sauce.
Add the onion and cook for 10 min. constantly stirring and tossing so nothing sticks to the bottom of the pot or Wok
more oil may be needed-add in small amounts until desired amount is reached.
Mix in lemon pepper, serve while hot.

Note: every thing can be separately cooked.
You don't want the onions to soft (they get sticky),
You don't want to cook the carrots to long (they get mushy),
You don't want to forget to stir the greens (they can burn and stick to pot).

If you cook every thing just right you will end up with
crisp greens with crisp pan fried carrots and onions
with a hint of spice and tomato.

Note: collared greens can be pungent if you are not used to eating them. The trick to enjoying this dish is to breath the aroma of the vegetables while you chew.
This dish will also help alleviate chest congestion.

EnjoySmile

Thanks for sharing it sound tasty, Smile


enigma


Mar 16, 2011, 5:51 AM
Post #386 of 509 (3199 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
In reply to:
Hey lets share our favorite vegetarian and vegan favorite recipes , What's yours?

I make quinoa porridge with almond milk for breakfast. I usually throw slivered almonds, fruit, cinnamon and honey in it.



Tongue thanks, I like maple syrup too!!


KeitaroHoshi


Mar 16, 2011, 5:57 AM
Post #387 of 509 (3196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2010
Posts: 171

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I like bit-o-honey candy.

Hey, I thought we were trading recepies here.


enigma


Mar 16, 2011, 5:59 AM
Post #388 of 509 (3195 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
marc801 wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
More like all week. I had it when I was 18. It was a very bad experience.
Out of curiosity, was it confirmed as salmonella?

Quite unpleasantly, yes.



BREITBART- WASHINGTON ASSOCIATED PRESS
AUGUST 10 2010

2000 Cases Reported -Christopher Braden-Epidemoligist- Federal Center of Disease Control
This form of salmonella is tied to outbreak can be passed from chickens that appear healthy grows inside egg not just on shell/
1/2 billion eggs recalled Iowa Hillandale Farms connected earlier this week
Wright County Farm 380 million recalled
14 states
cases often go undetected due to people not going to doctors and hospitals to get stool samples.
Estimates cases of poisoning may be 30 times higher than reported-FDA /CDC

This is recent and not from an egg company .
Its a neutral source .
Obviously not all eggs were affected.
However it is a word of caution.
So if you climb and get injured I'm sure its no big deal to get sick from salmonella. Continue On. Sly


enigma


Mar 16, 2011, 6:51 AM
Post #389 of 509 (3189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [cracklover] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay

I read about that study when it came out. One of the most interesting things about it hasn't been mentioned here.

The people who have the markers they've identified not only live longer they also live better. IIRC, this was not what they were specifically looking for, it was an un-anticipated correlation.

Basically these people experienced old age the way most of us will experience middle age: yes there are problems, but they are not debilitating, and the body and mind basically work great. It's quite remarkable, actually.

If further study backs up their findings, I bet there will be a lot of interest in those few families lucky enough to contain those genes.

Just for example, imagine how much you could make as a sperm donor to a rich and powerful family...

GO


Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?


Rufsen


Mar 16, 2011, 9:38 AM
Post #390 of 509 (3179 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2008
Posts: 126

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:

Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

You're a Lamarckian?


Partner cracklover


Mar 16, 2011, 3:13 PM
Post #391 of 509 (3150 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

No. But...

If modern Western culture survived long enough, there might actually be a tiny bit of evolutionary pressure toward a predilection to liking the taste of vegetables over fat/sugar/salt.

I say tiny because A - These things kill you mostly after, not before, child-bearing age, so there's not much selective pressure there, and B - We have millions of years of strong selective pressure towards getting as much fat/salt/sugar as we could in our diet. That's not getting reversed any time soon.

GO


gmggg


Mar 16, 2011, 4:30 PM
Post #392 of 509 (3136 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
cracklover wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:
What's your thought on blue zones where people live 100 and stay healthy, such as Okinawa, Ikaria, Sardina. and Costa Rica island on the Nicoya Penisula ?

The only one of those regions whose dietary pattern I'm familiar with is Okanawa, which was studied in the 1960s in the Seven Countries Study. The Okinawans had the longest lifespan in the study. Back then, at least, their diet was plant based and low in total and saturated fat. They were also physically active. So, yeah, I think their diet played a role in their longevity.

In reply to:
Are you familiar with The New England Centurian Study where they can predict with a 77% accuracy of living to 100 with your genome ,various genetic markers?

The New England Centenarian Study. This is the first I've heard of it, actually. I looked up their paper that was published in Science, and you're right: they have a genetic model that they claim has 77% predictive power. However, their statistical methodology has received serious criticism.

Jay

I read about that study when it came out. One of the most interesting things about it hasn't been mentioned here.

The people who have the markers they've identified not only live longer they also live better. IIRC, this was not what they were specifically looking for, it was an un-anticipated correlation.

Basically these people experienced old age the way most of us will experience middle age: yes there are problems, but they are not debilitating, and the body and mind basically work great. It's quite remarkable, actually.

If further study backs up their findings, I bet there will be a lot of interest in those few families lucky enough to contain those genes.

Just for example, imagine how much you could make as a sperm donor to a rich and powerful family...

GO


Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

Oh my god people, you almost got through to her. I'm impressed.


redrattie


Mar 17, 2011, 12:45 PM
Post #393 of 509 (3079 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 35

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay

Damn, had I known what Paleo was, I would have laughed with you, and then asked the serious question a couple posts later.

Thanks for the info on the oil. I've been a vegetarian for 20+ years and the only thing separating me from becoming vegan is the butter. What bothers me more than butter is all the high fructose corn syrup being added to products that never used to be there. I now make most of my meals from scratch and have stopped eating out since what used to be safe food, no longer is with all that added sugar.

You probably should be concerned about saturated fat intake. Saturated fat increases serum cholesterol, which increases the risk of heart disease.

Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

As to my comment about sugars being insoluble in fats, I hope I wasn't being to glib. In theory, everything is soluble in everything to some extent. So even though sugars are considered to be insoluble in fats, if coconuts contain fructose, then there could be trace amounts of fructose in coconut oil. I would think that the concentration would be too low to be of concern, but perhaps you should contact a dietitian or physician to be certain.

Jay
I agree butter is death. I only use about 4 tbsp per week and will give it up once I find a tasty substitute for cooking portabella mushrooms for "burgers". Luckily my cholesterol levels are in the optimal range. I appreciate the details on fructose content in oil, it was better than responses I've received in the past from my nutritionist who just gives me a yes or no, but never a why.


marc801


Mar 17, 2011, 2:31 PM
Post #394 of 509 (3063 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [KeitaroHoshi] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

KeitaroHoshi wrote:
Here is my best recipe.
<previously quoted recipe snipped>

Sounds like an excellent accompaniment to a nice, rare, USDA Prime steak.


enigma


Mar 17, 2011, 9:24 PM
Post #395 of 509 (3017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [redrattie] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:
jt512 wrote:
redrattie wrote:

Thanks for the coconut oil tip, I've been looking for something with a little bit of flavor to replace butter when I fry veggies for sandwiches. Not concerned at all with saturated fat, more concerned with whether coconut oil contains fructose. Anyone know if it contains fructose? (I don't eat anything with sugar)

Too funny!

Jay

Glad I was able to bring a laugh to your day, though not sure which part of my question you found to be most funny.

Sorry. You sounded just like a Paleo diet faddist. They think saturated fat is healthy and they're paranoid about fructose.

I don't think you have to worry about fructose being in any oil. Sugars aren't fat soluble.

Jay

Damn, had I known what Paleo was, I would have laughed with you, and then asked the serious question a couple posts later.

Thanks for the info on the oil. I've been a vegetarian for 20+ years and the only thing separating me from becoming vegan is the butter. What bothers me more than butter is all the high fructose corn syrup being added to products that never used to be there. I now make most of my meals from scratch and have stopped eating out since what used to be safe food, no longer is with all that added sugar.

You probably should be concerned about saturated fat intake. Saturated fat increases serum cholesterol, which increases the risk of heart disease.

Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

As to my comment about sugars being insoluble in fats, I hope I wasn't being to glib. In theory, everything is soluble in everything to some extent. So even though sugars are considered to be insoluble in fats, if coconuts contain fructose, then there could be trace amounts of fructose in coconut oil. I would think that the concentration would be too low to be of concern, but perhaps you should contact a dietitian or physician to be certain.

Jay
I agree butter is death. I only use about 4 tbsp per week and will give it up once I find a tasty substitute for cooking portabella mushrooms for "burgers". Luckily my cholesterol levels are in the optimal range. I appreciate the details on fructose content in oil, it was better than responses I've received in the past from my nutritionist who just gives me a yes or no, but never a why.

What's your recipe for those "portabella mushroom burgersr" ?


enigma


Mar 17, 2011, 9:26 PM
Post #396 of 509 (3012 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [Rufsen] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:

Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

You're a Lamarckian?

Are you in scientific research?


Gmburns2000


Mar 17, 2011, 9:34 PM
Post #397 of 509 (3005 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:

Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

You're a Lamarckian?

Are you in scientific research?

It's Saint Patrick's Day, I think he means you're looking for a pot of gold.


enigma


Mar 17, 2011, 9:55 PM
Post #398 of 509 (2995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
enigma wrote:
Rufsen wrote:
enigma wrote:

Jay,what was the diet that people living in blue zones had where they lived to 100?
The New England Cenetarian study, do you know what their diet was? Is it in the research?
Did their research show any of predictors of living to 100 by 77% besides their genetic markers?
Could any of those genetic markers be influenced by their diet ?
So if you had a healthy diet do you see any correlation of their survival and passing these genes (genomes) to the next generation?
Hypothetically could this be an example of "survival of the fittest" in some manner?

You're a Lamarckian?

Are you in scientific research?

It's Saint Patrick's Day, I think he means you're looking for a pot of gold.

Its a theory. Look it up .


KeitaroHoshi


Mar 18, 2011, 10:16 PM
Post #399 of 509 (2926 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2010
Posts: 171

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post




enigma


Mar 19, 2011, 2:06 AM
Post #400 of 509 (3432 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [KeitaroHoshi] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

KeitaroHoshi wrote:

Laugh


spikeddem


Mar 21, 2011, 4:54 PM
Post #401 of 509 (4117 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [marc801] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.


saint_john


Mar 21, 2011, 6:06 PM
Post #402 of 509 (4101 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.

are there even any nutrients in egg whites?


spikeddem


Mar 21, 2011, 6:13 PM
Post #403 of 509 (4097 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.

are there even any nutrients in egg whites?

One large egg white contains no cholesterol, but has 4.7 grams of protein. Daily maximum recommended cholesterol for a healthy adult (no cholesterol issues) is 300 mg. One large egg (yolk+white) has 213 mg of cholesterol. There is almost no fat in the white.


jt512


Mar 21, 2011, 6:54 PM
Post #404 of 509 (4083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
saint_john wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.

are there even any nutrients in egg whites?

One large egg white contains no cholesterol, but has 4.7 grams of protein. Daily maximum recommended cholesterol for a healthy adult (no cholesterol issues) is 300 mg. One large egg (yolk+white) has 213 mg of cholesterol.

372 mg, according to the USDA nutrient database, which can answer almost any question about the nutrient content of foods. They even list dried egg white.

Jay


spikeddem


Mar 21, 2011, 7:34 PM
Post #405 of 509 (4069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
saint_john wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.

are there even any nutrients in egg whites?

One large egg white contains no cholesterol, but has 4.7 grams of protein. Daily maximum recommended cholesterol for a healthy adult (no cholesterol issues) is 300 mg. One large egg (yolk+white) has 213 mg of cholesterol.

372 mg, according to the USDA nutrient database, which can answer almost any question about the nutrient content of foods. They even list dried egg white.

Jay
Thanks for that resource.

Your number of 372 mg is for 100 grams of egg, not one large egg (50 g), according to the USDA site you provided.


jt512


Mar 21, 2011, 7:52 PM
Post #406 of 509 (4061 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
jt512 wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
saint_john wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
Since this thread seems to be about diet in general, I'll just post my question here.

How're dried egg whites in comparison to the real thing? I mean from a diet perspective, not a taste perspective.

I'm going to be on the road a lot this spring/summer, and I have been thinking that dried egg whites would be one less thing that would need to stay cold.

are there even any nutrients in egg whites?

One large egg white contains no cholesterol, but has 4.7 grams of protein. Daily maximum recommended cholesterol for a healthy adult (no cholesterol issues) is 300 mg. One large egg (yolk+white) has 213 mg of cholesterol.

372 mg, according to the USDA nutrient database, which can answer almost any question about the nutrient content of foods. They even list dried egg white.

Jay
Thanks for that resource.

Your number of 372 mg is for 100 grams of egg, not one large egg (50 g), according to the USDA site you provided.

You're right. I was looking at the wrong column. I thought that number looked too high.

Jay


prAnaLIFE


Mar 21, 2011, 7:57 PM
Post #407 of 509 (4058 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 11, 2010
Posts: 2

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.prana.com/blog/2010/08/04/veggy-magazine-japan-interview-with-steph-davis/


saint_john


Mar 21, 2011, 8:09 PM
Post #409 of 509 (4047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [prAnaLIFE] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??


kachoong


Mar 21, 2011, 8:14 PM
Post #410 of 509 (4041 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??

Yeah, sneak up on them and kill them while they sleep... would be fine unless their having nightmares.


csproul


Mar 21, 2011, 9:13 PM
Post #411 of 509 (4016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??
My thought is that Steph Davis should stick to climbing.


marc801


Mar 21, 2011, 9:40 PM
Post #412 of 509 (4005 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??
I've rarely seen that much unsubstantiated new-age PETA bull shit crammed into a mere 3 sentences.


jt512


Mar 21, 2011, 9:41 PM
Post #413 of 509 (4004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??

Standard vegan mythology.

Jay


flesh


Mar 21, 2011, 10:00 PM
Post #414 of 509 (3987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2011
Posts: 419

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

I was a vegetarian (the kind that doesn't eat any meat, including fish) from 15-23 yrs. old. I'm 31 now, I can't testify to the science of it.

I can say this, it's easier to be lean and get the protein you need while eating meat. It's a side benefit that everytime you meet someone new you don't have to defend why you don't eat meat and unintentionally hurt others feelings/make them defensive. :)

Personally, I feel better if I do eat meat as long as it's in moderation.

ALso, I read years ago that creatine is only found in certain meats and in nothing else, millions of body builders probably aren't wrong.

That being said, I'm glad I was vege for 8 years. It took alot of disipline and independent thought to achieve this. I believe that in of itself has benefitted me in many ways since. Including in climbing and my business among other things.


jt512


Mar 21, 2011, 10:20 PM
Post #415 of 509 (3979 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [flesh] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

flesh wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

I was a vegetarian (the kind that doesn't eat any meat, including fish) from 15-23 yrs. old. I'm 31 now, I can't testify to the science of it.

No, actually you can't—not based on your subjective experience, anyway.

In reply to:
ALso, I read years ago that creatine is only found in certain meats and in nothing else . . .

That is both true and irrelevant, since your body produces all the creatine it needs.

In reply to:
 . . . millions of body builders probably aren't wrong.

Hopefully, you meant that sarcastically.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 21, 2011, 10:21 PM)


Partner camhead


Mar 22, 2011, 2:53 AM
Post #416 of 509 (3951 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
intersting interview with Steph Davis...

from the article
"There have been scientific studies that have shown that when animals die in a state of terror, there’s so much adrenaline and tension in them that it leaves chemicals spread through the body. Killing that animal and eating its meat filled with bad adrenalin and chemicals is obviously not good for your brain or your body. It makes people crazy and aggressive."

thought??

There have also been scientific studies showing that when you tickmark the fuck out of your projects, the rock cries and dies a little inside.

But Steph Davis doesn't care about that.


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 2:38 PM
Post #417 of 509 (3913 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.


Gmburns2000


Mar 22, 2011, 3:21 PM
Post #418 of 509 (3900 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.


lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 22, 2011, 3:28 PM
Post #419 of 509 (3895 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

+1.

I use olive oil for ~99% my cooking, occasionally sesame oil if the recipe (asian-themed, usually) calls for it, and sometimes other oils for my salads (e.i. oils that won't be heated --I like walnut, hazelnut or almond oil for salads).

I often substitute a combination of olive oil and applesauce for butter in baked goods.

But I do not know how to make a good pie crust without using butter. Vegetable oil just won't work for that. Putting things in perspective, in the past 10 months I have used 6 sticks of butter. I'm O.K., with that.


saint_john


Mar 22, 2011, 3:41 PM
Post #420 of 509 (3881 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [lena_chita] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.


spikeddem


Mar 22, 2011, 3:44 PM
Post #421 of 509 (3877 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.
I'm not really sure that it's playing devil's advocate when you're agreeing with three out of the last four posters.


saint_john


Mar 22, 2011, 4:16 PM
Post #422 of 509 (3869 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.
I'm not really sure that it's playing devil's advocate when you're agreeing with three out of the last four posters.

Now who's being the devil's advocate?


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 4:48 PM
Post #423 of 509 (3846 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter.

Googling "risotto without butter" will quickly show you that that's false.

Jay


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 4:53 PM
Post #424 of 509 (3840 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

I have not consumed a single homemade meal in like 30 years that contained butter. It has been literally that long since there has been a stick of butter in my home.

How many of those dozen things that supposedly require butter are healthy foods? The only mentions so far are croissants an pie crust, not exactly big in the healthy food department.

Jay


marc801


Mar 22, 2011, 5:01 PM
Post #425 of 509 (3857 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
How many of those dozen things that supposedly require butter are healthy foods? The only mentions so far are croissants an pie crust, not exactly big in the healthy food department.
There is no such thing as a healthy or unhealthy single food. Only diets are healthy or unhealthy. A Big Mac or croissant or slice of pie isn't going to kill you. 20 a week OTOH.....


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 5:09 PM
Post #426 of 509 (3886 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 5:09 PM
Post #427 of 509 (3886 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.


spikeddem


Mar 22, 2011, 5:12 PM
Post #428 of 509 (3882 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.


saint_john


Mar 22, 2011, 5:14 PM
Post #429 of 509 (3875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

...or gooey butter cake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gooey_butter_cake


csproul


Mar 22, 2011, 5:17 PM
Post #430 of 509 (3872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.
I once knew a person (really...it wasn't me) who was really really baked and thought it would be tasty to eat butter covered in maple syrup. It was (allegedly) just like eating pancakes, without all that annoying filler.


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 5:25 PM
Post #431 of 509 (3867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

I have not consumed a single homemade meal in like 30 years that contained butter. It has been literally that long since there has been a stick of butter in my home.

How many of those dozen things that supposedly require butter are healthy foods? The only mentions so far are croissants an pie crust, not exactly big in the healthy food department.

Jay

I never argued that it is impossible to "consume a meal" without butter. I even made sure to delineate the difference between fueling your body and participating in the experience of eating.

I do agree with you about the healthfulness of any particular buttery item. But as I said, there are some things that (if you're going to eat them) should be (or can only be) made out of butter.

To use an earlier example: Why would you shove a greasy margarine croissant into your face when you could enjoy a delicate buttery one? To save a few g of saturated fat? The caloric value of either croissant is most likely equal. Should you be ingesting 300 calories of sugar and fat in the first place? Probably not. But if you must, then shouldn't it be the highest quality experience possible?

And I do agree with you that butter can be eliminated in daily cooking.


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 5:27 PM
Post #432 of 509 (3861 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay


marc801


Mar 22, 2011, 5:29 PM
Post #433 of 509 (3856 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

saint_john wrote:
...or gooey butter cake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gooey_butter_cake
http://www.slashfood.com/...it-texas-state-fair/


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 5:39 PM
Post #434 of 509 (3846 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay

My point exactly!

While I admittedly don't know the specific chemistry of why not you can't use olive/vegetable oil for a glaze because the sugar does not combine sufficiently to produce an even coating. While you can fake the effect with cornstarch, arrow root, taro, or any emulsifier it's not the same as the creamy full-coating glaze you get with butter.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 22, 2011, 5:48 PM
Post #435 of 509 (3838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Other things for which butter is better than olive oil.




airscape


Mar 22, 2011, 6:09 PM
Post #436 of 509 (3828 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

I have not consumed a single homemade meal in like 30 years that contained butter. It has been literally that long since there has been a stick of butter in my home.

How many of those dozen things that supposedly require butter are healthy foods? The only mentions so far are croissants an pie crust, not exactly big in the healthy food department.

Jay

You can say "supposedly require butter", but if you really want it to be super awesome tasty then substitution just isn't an option. The same is true for cream.

Just fresh bread with a thick slice of butter beats any margarine/oil/.

Beurre blanc
Beurre noisette
Cake <- If I eat cake it must be awesome, any substitute or shortcut and I don't eat it. I rather have less of something than have to eat shit.
chicken kiev
butter chicken
Bread and butter pudding
Risotto
Alfredo
Also eggs, you can't fry/scramble eggs in anything else and I don't care what anyone says it doesn't work.

Is a few years of supposed life really worth not eating butter?


airscape


Mar 22, 2011, 6:11 PM
Post #437 of 509 (3825 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.

+1

Although I only partake if the bread is truly excellent.


spikeddem


Mar 22, 2011, 6:15 PM
Post #438 of 509 (3813 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [airscape] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

airscape wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.

+1

Although I only partake if the bread is truly excellent.
The bread is made of butter.


airscape


Mar 22, 2011, 6:17 PM
Post #439 of 509 (3810 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay

My point exactly!

While I admittedly don't know the specific chemistry of why not you can't use olive/vegetable oil for a glaze because the sugar does not combine sufficiently to produce an even coating. While you can fake the effect with cornstarch, arrow root, taro, or any emulsifier it's not the same as the creamy full-coating glaze you get with butter.

Doughnut forgets a baked potato. it's sour cream or butter.

Glazed carrots taste crap with olive oil, if you are going to use sugar you might just as well put the butters.

Also mashed potato, the butter is key.


airscape


Mar 22, 2011, 6:23 PM
Post #440 of 509 (3813 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [spikeddem] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spikeddem wrote:
airscape wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.

+1

Although I only partake if the bread is truly excellent.
The bread is made of butter.

One of my favorite eats is slow roasted lamb ribs with new potatoes roasted in the lamb fat and topped with butter with a side of glazed carrots and coleslaw. Also with dessert of bread and butter pudding.

Shiny face = happy face.


airscape


Mar 22, 2011, 6:26 PM
Post #441 of 509 (3810 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [airscape] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 

Pumpkin also needs butter.


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 6:31 PM
Post #442 of 509 (3801 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay

My point exactly!

While I admittedly don't know the specific chemistry of why not you can't use olive/vegetable oil for a glaze because the sugar does not combine sufficiently to produce an even coating. While you can fake the effect with cornstarch, arrow root, taro, or any emulsifier it's not the same as the creamy full-coating glaze you get with butter.

So you need to use butter instead of olive oil, because you need to use sugar, too. I guess, then, you've made my point as well.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 22, 2011, 6:38 PM)


saint_john


Mar 22, 2011, 6:38 PM
Post #443 of 509 (3796 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [airscape] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Is a few years of supposed life really worth not eating butter?

probably not, airscape. probably not.


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 7:01 PM
Post #444 of 509 (3787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I forgot to remind you that I agree completely about the claims you are making re:health. I'm just of the mind that moderation is sufficient. If that assumption is wrong in some way I would be genuinely interested to hear it.

I imagine that moderation can mean a lot of different things biologically. So maybe it's a silly thing to talk about from any sort of scientific or verifiable standpoint.

But... I would be willing to accept (and appreciate) your inference on the matter.

1. Can "healthy eating" be achieved with out the wholesale sacrifice of superfluous foods such as alcohol, butter, bacon, et. al.

2. If it can, how much better would this "healthier eating" be than an unregulated diet.

3. How much worse than a perfect diet?


Gmburns2000


Mar 22, 2011, 7:01 PM
Post #445 of 509 (3786 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter.

Googling "risotto without butter" will quickly show you that that's false.

Jay

I'm not a cook, and I don't cook with butter, but the folks making it said that it couldn't be done. Now, what they really may have meant is that risotto without butter is crap. I don't know if that's true or not.


hafilax


Mar 22, 2011, 7:09 PM
Post #446 of 509 (3782 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay
You keep talking about the absolute blood cholesterol. Isn't the HDL to LDL ratio a better indicator of heart disease risk? I agree that intelligently managing the absolute cholesterol levels is important but I don't think it is the only factor.


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 7:15 PM
Post #447 of 509 (3776 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter.

Googling "risotto without butter" will quickly show you that that's false.

Jay

I'm not a cook, and I don't cook with butter, but the folks making it said that it couldn't be done. Now, what they really may have meant is that risotto without butter is crap. I don't know if that's true or not.

I think risotto made with butter tastes like crap, and the fact that you have to wait extra long for it to be prepared for you in restaurants just adds insult to injury. I can't see how making it with olive oil could make it taste any worse.

Jay


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 7:18 PM
Post #448 of 509 (3772 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay
You keep talking about the absolute blood cholesterol. Isn't the HDL to LDL ratio a better indicator of heart disease risk?

I've been oversimplifying. Yes, LDL-cholesterol is the bad stuff and HDL- the good stuff. Substituting vegetable oils for animal fats reduces LDL-cholesterol, and has no effect on HDL-cholesterol, and therefore lowers the LDL/HDL ratio.

In reply to:
I agree that intelligently managing the absolute cholesterol levels is important . . .

Actually, it's not important. What's important are the relative levels of the cholesterol fractions. I've seen people with total cholesterol of less than 100 mg/dL, but HDL of 0, whom I would consider at high risk for heart disease; but people with total cholesterol near 200 mg/dL with HDL over 100 mg/dL, who I would consider at low risk.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 22, 2011, 7:23 PM)


Partner epoch
Moderator

Mar 22, 2011, 7:20 PM
Post #449 of 509 (3767 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

We're still debating crap that is irrelevant to the OP, which IMO was a useless troll post anyway.


justroberto


Mar 22, 2011, 7:20 PM
Post #450 of 509 (4987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or buerre blanc, or eggs benedict, or...

What a joyless existence that must be.


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 7:36 PM
Post #451 of 509 (4979 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

he was actually responding to me earlier in the thread, but as an aside, I recently learned that you can't do risotto without butter. I don't know if it can be done, and I was concerned when I saw her putting butter in the pot, but I admit that it was damn good.

Not the greatest example of something that would be impossible without butter. But it damn sure wouldn't taste the same or have the same consistency.

For something that is impossible without butter try glazed carrots.

I don't know about "glazed" carrots, but what's wrong with using olive oil instead? Yes, they'll taste different. So what? Get used to the taste of healthy food. The fact is that if you want to eat a healthy diet, there are certain things you have to do differently. If most people substituted vegetables oils for the animal fats in their diet they would see an almost immediate significant reduction in their blood cholesterol level, with attendant reduction in heart disease risk.

Jay

My point exactly!

While I admittedly don't know the specific chemistry of why not you can't use olive/vegetable oil for a glaze because the sugar does not combine sufficiently to produce an even coating. While you can fake the effect with cornstarch, arrow root, taro, or any emulsifier it's not the same as the creamy full-coating glaze you get with butter.

So you need to use butter instead of olive oil, because you need to use sugar, too. I guess, then, you've made my point as well.

Jay

I'm not talking about a healthy diet. I agree with you on limiting or eliminating certain foods. I just took exception to the statement that oils could replicate butter. I also don't appreciate fake soy lunch meats, tofurky, margarine, vegan cheese, or any other food that is trying to emulate something else.

As I said up-thread I grew up as a vegan. Most of my meals still are vegan. You can make great delicious food with those dietary limitations. There's no reason to do a shitty job faking something when you can do a good job making something new.


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 7:42 PM
Post #452 of 509 (4969 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
I forgot to remind you that I agree completely about the claims you are making re:health. I'm just of the mind that moderation is sufficient. If that assumption is wrong in some way I would be genuinely interested to hear it.

I imagine that moderation can mean a lot of different things biologically. So maybe it's a silly thing to talk about from any sort of scientific or verifiable standpoint.

There are some health of effects of diet, such as blood cholesterol levels, that are easy to quantify. There is generally a dose–response relation between the ratio of animal fats to plant oils in the diet and the ratio of LDL-to-HDL-cholesterol, which predicts heart disease risk, in the blood. So you can, in a sense, quantify the effects of a diet of "moderation," compared with a terrible diet or an excellent one. Different people have different tolerance levels for putatively heart-unhealthy foods. You can actually experiment on yourself, since blood cholesterol levels adjust to a change in diet in 2 to 3 weeks: have your cholesterol checked to get a baseline, change your diet, and have your cholesterol checked again a few weeks later.

In reply to:
Can "healthy eating" be achieved with out the wholesale sacrifice of superfluous foods such as alcohol, butter, bacon, et. al.

First of all, alcohol in moderation is healthy. There is a consistent body of evidence showing that moderate drinkers live longer than both heavy drinkers and abstainers, and there are plausible biological hypotheses to explain this observation.

Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung. There is a growing body evidence showing a dose-response relation between the amount of bacon (and other processed meats) consumed and the incidence of digestive tract cancers. Is there a level of consumption below which there is no increased risk of cancer? Is there a level of cigarette smoking below which there is no increased risk of cancer? I don't know the answer to either question, and, personally, I don't need to know. The research findings are enough for me to avoid any intake of either substance.

With respect to butter, that's the kind of question that can be at least partially answered by doing a pre–post check of your cholesterol levels, as per my first paragraph.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 23, 2011, 6:31 AM)


gmggg


Mar 22, 2011, 7:55 PM
Post #453 of 509 (4956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
I forgot to remind you that I agree completely about the claims you are making re:health. I'm just of the mind that moderation is sufficient. If that assumption is wrong in some way I would be genuinely interested to hear it.

I imagine that moderation can mean a lot of different things biologically. So maybe it's a silly thing to talk about from any sort of scientific or verifiable standpoint.

There are some health of effects of diet, such as blood cholesterol levels, that are easy to quantify. There is generally a dose–response relation between the ratio of animal fats to plant oils in the diet and the ratio of LDL-to-HDl-cholesterol, which predicts heart disease risk, in the blood. So you can, in a sense, quantify the effects of a diet of "moderation," compared with terrible and excellent diets. Different people have different tolerance levels for putatively heart-unhealthy foods. You can actually experiment on yourself, since blood cholesterol levels adjust to a change in diet in 2 to 3 weeks. Have your cholesterol checked to get a baseline, change your diet, and have your cholesterol checked again.

In reply to:
Can "healthy eating" be achieved with out the wholesale sacrifice of superfluous foods such as alcohol, butter, bacon, et. al.

First of all, alcohol in moderation is healthy. There is a consistent body of evidence showing that moderate drinkers live longer than both heavy drinkers abstainers, and there are plausible biological hypotheses for this finding.

Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung. There is a growing body evidence showing a dose-response relation between the amount of bacon (and other processed meats) consumed and the incidence of digestive tract cancers. Is there a level of consumption below which there is no increased risk of cancer? Is there a level of cigarette smoking below which there is no increased risk of cancer? I don't know the answer to either question, and, personally, I don't need to know.

With respect to butter, that's the kind of question that can be at least partially answered by doing a pre-post check of your cholesterol levels, as per my first paragraph.

Jay

Good info!

As for processed meats is there any research into what exactly is carcinogenic? Is it only the preservatives used; nitrites, salt and the like? Or is there some other mechanism that is still being debated - alá red meat and colon cancer?

Of course, I'm merely looking for an excuse to continue eating processed meats that are nitrite-free and feel OK about it.


justroberto


Mar 22, 2011, 8:11 PM
Post #454 of 509 (4942 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung.

Fantastic. Today marks the day I start frying 20 pieces of bacon every day and carefully arranging them in a small cardboard box, which I'll carry around in the breast pocket of my shirt everywhere I go. Whenever I get stressed out, I'll politely excuse myself, wander outside, and gnaw on one for five or ten minutes.

I rather like this idea.


saint_john


Mar 22, 2011, 8:20 PM
Post #455 of 509 (4934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2010
Posts: 494

Re: [justroberto] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung.

Fantastic. Today marks the day I start frying 20 pieces of bacon every day and carefully arranging them in a small cardboard box, which I'll carry around in the breast pocket of my shirt everywhere I go. Whenever I get stressed out, I'll politely excuse myself, wander outside, and gnaw on one for five or ten minutes.

I rather like this idea.

your post is funny but many, many, many people use food just like they use cigarettes,


pyrosis


Mar 22, 2011, 8:31 PM
Post #456 of 509 (4926 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2004
Posts: 150

Re: [saint_john] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jay,

What are your thoughts on serum triglyceride levels as a marker of coronary artery disease risk?


spikeddem


Mar 22, 2011, 8:42 PM
Post #457 of 509 (4916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

We're still debating crap that is irrelevant to the OP, which IMO was a useless troll post anyway.
Easily my favorite thread in general right now.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 22, 2011, 9:10 PM
Post #458 of 509 (4903 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [epoch] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epoch wrote:
enigma wrote:
Before the Ice Age humans didn't eat meat, and we ate mostly a vegetarian diet, afterwards we ate meat, when vegetation wasn't readily available.
Climbers who generally are dirtbagging often don't include perishable foods in their diet as well. Personally I have known quite a few vegan climbers who are excellent.
In addition monkeys and apes are excellent climbers and exist on vegetarian diet unless there is survival need for them to eat meat.

So Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian who has more endurance and climbs better? Or it doesn't matter?

We're still debating crap that is irrelevant to the OP, which IMO was a useless troll post anyway.

Well why don't you go thru the entire thread and clip out all of the off OP topic posts?


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 9:33 PM
Post #459 of 509 (4889 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:

As for processed meats is there any research into what exactly is carcinogenic? Is it only the preservatives used; nitrites, salt and the like? Or is there some other mechanism that is still being debated - alá red meat and colon cancer?

The best answer I can give you is probably to quote from the discussion section of the National Cancer Institute's study on "Meat Intake and Mortality," which found dose–response relations between intakes of red meat and processed meat and death rates for all causes, cardiovascular disease, and all cancers in a huge epidemiologic cohort (> 500,000 subjects followed for 10 years):
There are various mechanisms by which meat may be related to mortality. In relation to cancer, meat is a source of several multisite carcinogens, including heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are both formed during high-temperature cooking of meat, as well as N-nitroso compounds [formed from nitrate and nitrite preservatives]. Furthermore, meat is a major source of saturated fat, which has been positively associated with breast and colorectal cancer. ¹

Unfortunately, the definition of red meat used in this study included processed red meat, so it is difficult to quantify the risk from unprocessed red meat from their paper. However, except for nitrate and nitrite preservatives, processed and unprocessed red meats contain a similar profile of potential carcinogens, which suggests that they may have similar effects on risk of developing cancer.

Jay

¹ Sinha R et al. Meat Intake and Mortality: A Prospective Study of Over Half a Million People. Arch Intern Med. 2009(6):562–571.


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 23, 2011, 6:31 PM)


jt512


Mar 22, 2011, 9:48 PM
Post #460 of 509 (4877 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [pyrosis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

pyrosis wrote:
Jay,

What are your thoughts on serum triglyceride levels as a marker of coronary artery disease risk?

Serum triglycerides (TG) are a marker for heart disease risk, but TG is highly negatively correlated with HDL-cholesterol, and therefore provides little additional information about risk after LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels are taken into account.

Jay


enigma


Mar 23, 2011, 9:26 PM
Post #461 of 509 (4819 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Like I said up-thread, I haven't had butter in my home for two decades. I can't think of anything you can do with butter that you can't do with either olive oil or canola oil, and you'll be healthier by doing it.

Jay

You may know a lot about nutrition but you seem to know nothing about food. There is a difference between ingesting calories and eating a meal.

I do accept your health concerns completely. But I can think of a dozen things that you can't do with a butter substitute - not to mention the dishes that don't yield equivalent results with oils and/or shortening.

I have not consumed a single homemade meal in like 30 years that contained butter. It has been literally that long since there has been a stick of butter in my home.

How many of those dozen things that supposedly require butter are healthy foods? The only mentions so far are croissants an pie crust, not exactly big in the healthy food department.

Jay

For delicious flavor try Sesame Oil. its great on vegetables or in soup.
You can use a non-stick no calorie spray first if you are watching your calories then put sesame oil on the vegetables once its cooked.
Tahini is also a good addition if you mix it with soy sauce for meals. If you want it spicy then you can add in some chili powder in sauce form or indian spices are great too.

Saint John- I doubt you can get a croissant without butter. They are good. Tongue
Maybe you can have it on your birthday just for a splurge.


enigma


Mar 24, 2011, 2:28 AM
Post #462 of 509 (4788 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
gmggg wrote:
I forgot to remind you that I agree completely about the claims you are making re:health. I'm just of the mind that moderation is sufficient. If that assumption is wrong in some way I would be genuinely interested to hear it.

I imagine that moderation can mean a lot of different things biologically. So maybe it's a silly thing to talk about from any sort of scientific or verifiable standpoint.

There are some health of effects of diet, such as blood cholesterol levels, that are easy to quantify. There is generally a dose–response relation between the ratio of animal fats to plant oils in the diet and the ratio of LDL-to-HDL-cholesterol, which predicts heart disease risk, in the blood. So you can, in a sense, quantify the effects of a diet of "moderation," compared with a terrible diet or an excellent one. Different people have different tolerance levels for putatively heart-unhealthy foods. You can actually experiment on yourself, since blood cholesterol levels adjust to a change in diet in 2 to 3 weeks: have your cholesterol checked to get a baseline, change your diet, and have your cholesterol checked again a few weeks later.

In reply to:
Can "healthy eating" be achieved with out the wholesale sacrifice of superfluous foods such as alcohol, butter, bacon, et. al.

First of all, alcohol in moderation is healthy. There is a consistent body of evidence showing that moderate drinkers live longer than both heavy drinkers and abstainers, and there are plausible biological hypotheses to explain this observation.

Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung. There is a growing body evidence showing a dose-response relation between the amount of bacon (and other processed meats) consumed and the incidence of digestive tract cancers. Is there a level of consumption below which there is no increased risk of cancer? Is there a level of cigarette smoking below which there is no increased risk of cancer? I don't know the answer to either question, and, personally, I don't need to know. The research findings are enough for me to avoid any intake of either substance.

With respect to butter, that's the kind of question that can be at least partially answered by doing a pre–post check of your cholesterol levels, as per my first paragraph.

Jay


In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?
Are you speaking about red wine?

Since many wines contain sulfiates is it better to find wines that are natural,
since their seems to be a correlation between these additives and headaches?
Thanks in advance for any research studies that may be helpful.


jt512


Mar 24, 2011, 6:51 AM
Post #463 of 509 (4771 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

In reply to:
Since many wines contain sulfiates is it better to find wines that are natural . . .

I'm not aware of any evidence for detrimental health effects of sulfates in wine, but it's not a subject I've actively looked into. If there are detrimental effects, then the evidence clearly shows that they are outweighed by the beneficial effects of the wine. We also can't rule out that the benefits of wine consumption are, in part, actually due to the sulfates.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Mar 24, 2011, 6:52 AM)


Partner camhead


Mar 24, 2011, 11:24 AM
Post #464 of 509 (4742 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

Woo! (cracks open a Four Loko for breakfast)


kachoong


Mar 24, 2011, 12:50 PM
Post #465 of 509 (4730 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [csproul] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

csproul wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.
I once knew a person (really...it wasn't me) who was really really baked and thought it would be tasty to eat butter covered in maple syrup. It was (allegedly) just like eating pancakes, without all that annoying filler.

Heh... so he consumed around 1000 calories or so and then proceeded to still be hungry?

Reminds me of a time we were backcountry climbing in Aus and a friend of mine bet my other friend that he couldn't eat the 500g block of sharp chedder cheese we had with us in five minutes, because the first friend said he was so hungry he could eat the back end of a lactating cow. I was kinda hoping he wouldn't take the bet since it was our only cheese.

Anyway, he says "That's easy, give it here!", grabs the cheese and takes a HUGE chunk of a bite out of it... almost a quarter of the block at once. I figured, oh well, there goes the cheese. So he chewed and chewed and chewed like a MoFo for ages... beads of sweat formed on his forehead and his face started to go red. He tried talking... sounded something like "Vooo Faffed Foo Veee Kfidding Mee! Vis Fucks!"

Three minutes were up and he still hadn't finished chewing the first bite. By the time five minutes were up he had just swallowed the last of the first bite and we were rolling on the ground laughing our asses off. Wasn't a good bet to take.


airscape


Mar 24, 2011, 12:57 PM
Post #466 of 509 (4722 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240

Re: [kachoong] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
csproul wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.
I once knew a person (really...it wasn't me) who was really really baked and thought it would be tasty to eat butter covered in maple syrup. It was (allegedly) just like eating pancakes, without all that annoying filler.

Heh... so he consumed around 1000 calories or so and then proceeded to still be hungry?

Reminds me of a time we were backcountry climbing in Aus and a friend of mine bet my other friend that he couldn't eat the 500g block of sharp chedder cheese we had with us in five minutes, because the first friend said he was so hungry he could eat the back end of a lactating cow. I was kinda hoping he wouldn't take the bet since it was our only cheese.

Anyway, he says "That's easy, give it here!", grabs the cheese and takes a HUGE chunk of a bite out of it... almost a quarter of the block at once. I figured, oh well, there goes the cheese. So he chewed and chewed and chewed like a MoFo for ages... beads of sweat formed on his forehead and his face started to go red. He tried talking... sounded something like "Vooo Faffed Foo Veee Kfidding Mee! Vis Fucks!"

Three minutes were up and he still hadn't finished chewing the first bite. By the time five minutes were up he had just swallowed the last of the first bite and we were rolling on the ground laughing our asses off. Wasn't a good bet to take.

heh!

Why does a bite out of a chunk of cheese taste different than if you eat a slice of the same cheese?


kachoong


Mar 24, 2011, 1:05 PM
Post #467 of 509 (4717 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [justroberto] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
jt512 wrote:
Secondly, bacon is to cancers of the digestive tract as cigarettes are to cancer of the lung.

Fantastic. Today marks the day I start frying 20 pieces of bacon every day and carefully arranging them in a small cardboard box, which I'll carry around in the breast pocket of my shirt everywhere I go. Whenever I get stressed out, I'll politely excuse myself, wander outside, and gnaw on one for five or ten minutes.

I rather like this idea.

That's awesome!

I hate it when people wave those cuts of bacon around in my face... even worse when you see someone in a car with one, the windows are up and there's a child in the backseat.


kachoong


Mar 24, 2011, 1:08 PM
Post #468 of 509 (4715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304

Re: [airscape] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

airscape wrote:
kachoong wrote:
csproul wrote:
spikeddem wrote:
gmggg wrote:
saint_john wrote:
i'll be the devil's advocate and say that croissants are also not possible without butter.

Well, unfortunately supermarkets across the country have proved you wrong. Although their results are inferior to a true croissant.

Something that is impossible without butter would be a pate à choux.

Or a butter stick sandwich. A truly fine delicacy once enjoyed in my younger days.
I once knew a person (really...it wasn't me) who was really really baked and thought it would be tasty to eat butter covered in maple syrup. It was (allegedly) just like eating pancakes, without all that annoying filler.

Heh... so he consumed around 1000 calories or so and then proceeded to still be hungry?

Reminds me of a time we were backcountry climbing in Aus and a friend of mine bet my other friend that he couldn't eat the 500g block of sharp chedder cheese we had with us in five minutes, because the first friend said he was so hungry he could eat the back end of a lactating cow. I was kinda hoping he wouldn't take the bet since it was our only cheese.

Anyway, he says "That's easy, give it here!", grabs the cheese and takes a HUGE chunk of a bite out of it... almost a quarter of the block at once. I figured, oh well, there goes the cheese. So he chewed and chewed and chewed like a MoFo for ages... beads of sweat formed on his forehead and his face started to go red. He tried talking... sounded something like "Vooo Faffed Foo Veee Kfidding Mee! Vis Fucks!"

Three minutes were up and he still hadn't finished chewing the first bite. By the time five minutes were up he had just swallowed the last of the first bite and we were rolling on the ground laughing our asses off. Wasn't a good bet to take.

heh!

Why does a bite out of a chunk of cheese taste different than if you eat a slice of the same cheese?

Something we wondered while he was wearing his jaw out. I'm sure if he had done a slice at a time he'd have finished the block. His mistake was clear.


enigma


Mar 24, 2011, 10:15 PM
Post #469 of 509 (4660 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

In reply to:
Since many wines contain sulfiates is it better to find wines that are natural . . .

I'm not aware of any evidence for detrimental health effects of sulfates in wine, but it's not a subject I've actively looked into. If there are detrimental effects, then the evidence clearly shows that they are outweighed by the beneficial effects of the wine. We also can't rule out that the benefits of wine consumption are, in part, actually due to the sulfates.

Jay

Are you speaking in reference to the resveratrol in red wine?
According to the articles I've seen you would need quite a bit for it to be beneficial in regard to heart disease.
How much would help in regard to the heart disease connection?

Why is alcohol in moderation good for you?


(This post was edited by enigma on Mar 24, 2011, 10:17 PM)


jt512


Mar 24, 2011, 11:24 PM
Post #470 of 509 (4642 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

In reply to:
Since many wines contain sulfiates is it better to find wines that are natural . . .

I'm not aware of any evidence for detrimental health effects of sulfates in wine, but it's not a subject I've actively looked into. If there are detrimental effects, then the evidence clearly shows that they are outweighed by the beneficial effects of the wine. We also can't rule out that the benefits of wine consumption are, in part, actually due to the sulfates.

Jay

Are you speaking in reference to the resveratrol in red wine?

Not specifically, no.

In reply to:
Why is alcohol in moderation good for you?

For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


dr_feelgood


Mar 28, 2011, 3:14 PM
Post #471 of 509 (4553 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [camhead] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

Woo! (cracks open a Four Loko for breakfast)

Charles Bronson wept because nature had been vindicated.


enigma


Apr 6, 2011, 4:26 AM
Post #472 of 509 (4503 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [dr_feelgood] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

In reply to:
Are you speaking about red wine?

There is evidence that red wine is superior to other alcoholic drinks, but benefits have been shown for alcoholic drinks in general. Apparently, there is a benefit for ethanol per se.

Woo! (cracks open a Four Loko for breakfast)

Charles Bronson wept because nature had been vindicated.
======================================
I went back to eggs , however only one kind that seem good w omega ,organic brown types but they are 4.00 a dozen.
=====================================
Oh, be extra careful of fish, its pretty much all tainted with radiation levels millions of times above the regulatory limit. Its from gushing water into Pacific ocean-CNN news 4/5/2011


=====================================
My new recipe to share, 2 cups of unsweetened organic soy milk , 1/2 cup steel oats, 1/2 cup applesauce, 1 teaspoon pumpkin pie spice.
Simmer low heat until thickened add more oats if not thick enough.
Delicious for breakfast.
Top off with raisins.shredded almonds etc.

=====================================

Make sure you have your Charles Bronson drinks at the end of the night. For health reasons.

I saw someone buying Arrogant Bastard Ale today

Wink


(This post was edited by enigma on Apr 6, 2011, 6:07 AM)


hafilax


Apr 6, 2011, 11:19 PM
Post #473 of 509 (4470 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You wouldn't eat blinky?


Maybe you should invest in a Geiger counter although I hear their hot items on ebay right now along with iodine. Nothing like a little paranoia profiteering.


enigma


Apr 6, 2011, 11:35 PM
Post #474 of 509 (4465 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [hafilax] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
You wouldn't eat blinky?
[image]http://backseatblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Blinky.gif[/image]

Maybe you should invest in a Geiger counter although I hear their hot items on ebay right now along with iodine. Nothing like a little paranoia profiteering.


Pacific Coast filled with radiation. Fish used in japanese restaurants from Chile now.

Or, Farmed fish with dioxins and hormones.

Best bet would be wild fish from the atlantic ocean, Canada, Alaska, Eastern Coast of U.S.


altelis


Apr 7, 2011, 3:18 AM
Post #475 of 509 (4571 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).


enigma


Apr 8, 2011, 6:20 AM
Post #476 of 509 (4644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.


Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).

=====================================
Are you saying Jt512 is incorrect on his information, regarding drinking alcohol?

So according to your research it has to be wine, and with folate in the diet, is that correct?

No beer, No scotch, it must be wine for it to be beneficial, is that what you are stating?

Could you be so kind to share this particular research study. ?


altelis


Apr 8, 2011, 11:45 AM
Post #477 of 509 (4636 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.


Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).


In reply to:

=====================================
Are you saying Jt512 is incorrect on his information, regarding drinking alcohol?

No. Read. I said he was correct, but the recommendations were more nuanced than he suggested.


In reply to:

So according to your research it has to be wine, and with folate in the diet, is that correct?
No. Read. It wasn't my research, and it was the EQUIVALENT of a glass of wine. That's easier to type than "12 g alcohol which is equivalent to 1 8 0z beer, 1 4 oz wine or 1 oz of 80 proof liquor". Guess I couldn't avoid it after all..

And yes, increased risk was seen instead of benefit for WOMEN who had 1 alcoholic drink/day whose diet was folate deficient. >1 drink/day, regardless of folate intake, was either not beneficial or had increased health risks IN WOMEN.

In reply to:
No beer, No scotch, it must be wine for it to be beneficial, is that what you are stating?
No. Read. That's not what I'm stating.

In reply to:

Could you be so kind to share this particular research study. ?

No. Google Scholar has made access to an academic library un-necessary to find scholarly research and at least read the abstract. The information was not gleaned from a single article, but rather many primary studies as well as Cochran reviews and other review articles.



Good grief, did NOBODY teach you logical reasoning? By the way studies have shown that those without sufficient folate and Vitamin B45.6 in their diet are more likely to fall prey to online scams.

In unrelated news, I know a Nigerian prince who might be able to make you TONS of money. Lemme know if you want his contact info...


Gmburns2000


Apr 8, 2011, 1:23 PM
Post #478 of 509 (4628 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).

really dumb question. I know there are studies linking moderate drinking, in general, to better health (in general). Just curious, though, and I'm not even sure how to ask the question clearly, how much of the benefit has to do with the ingredients over the alcohol itself?

In other words, with regards to wine, how much of the benefit is due to the grapes? Would grape juice (not the overly sugared kind) be a better substitute? And with beer, would barley, for instance, be better than beer?

I don't know what goes into other kinds of liquor necessarily, so I can't comment on things like high-quality vodka, whiskey, or pisco, etc..


billcoe_


Apr 8, 2011, 7:42 PM
Post #479 of 509 (4595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Interesting alcohol info out today.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12999000

"The Europe-wide study of 363,988 people reported in the British Medical Journal found one in 10 of all cancers in men and one in 33 in women were caused by past or current alcohol intake.

More than 18% of alcohol-related cancers in men and about 4% in women were linked to excessive drinking."


..........more


altelis


Apr 8, 2011, 9:48 PM
Post #480 of 509 (4575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [Gmburns2000] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).

really dumb question. I know there are studies linking moderate drinking, in general, to better health (in general). Just curious, though, and I'm not even sure how to ask the question clearly, how much of the benefit has to do with the ingredients over the alcohol itself?

In other words, with regards to wine, how much of the benefit is due to the grapes? Would grape juice (not the overly sugared kind) be a better substitute? And with beer, would barley, for instance, be better than beer?

I don't know what goes into other kinds of liquor necessarily, so I can't comment on things like high-quality vodka, whiskey, or pisco, etc..


The studies that I have seen seem to hint at the fact that its something about an "alcoholic drink" in general that confers benefit.

I'm interested to hear what Jay thinks about this, but it's my opinion (decently well supported by the literature) that our use of reductionistic thinking in the realm of food & nutrition is misguided. We (at least many American & European societies) want to know what it is IN PARTICULAR that makes eating X food so beneficial.

Many of the studies I have seen in this light show that each time we find a food that is beneficial, pick (often seemingly at random) a nutrient unique to or at least in abundance in that food, and use it as a supplement, the beneficial results aren't replicated. This suggests that when we derive benefit from a food it isn't due to a single agent but rather to a multifactorial cause.

There are some foods we have identified as beneficial AND have been able to identify a single agent. Often (though not always) these foods were pretty simple to start with- like certain plant oils providing cardio-protective effects. We have replicated these effects with a single substance, omega 3 FA. Great, but the oils weren't exactly a complicated mix to start with.

Interestingly, the converse tends to NOT be true. Typically, foods that we have identified as being HARMFUL to us typically do have ONE causative agent. And removing that agent removes/greatly reduces the harm conferred from that food.


TarHeelEMT


Apr 8, 2011, 9:48 PM
Post #481 of 509 (4575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.


(This post was edited by TarHeelEMT on Apr 8, 2011, 9:49 PM)


jt512


Apr 8, 2011, 9:54 PM
Post #482 of 509 (4571 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.

Nonsense. What paleolithic diet website have you been visiting?

Jay


TarHeelEMT


Apr 8, 2011, 9:55 PM
Post #483 of 509 (4568 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.

Nonsense. What paleolithic diet website have you been visiting?

Jay


Three years of medical school and partway through an MPH.

The certainty of the claims you're making is vastly overstated.


(This post was edited by TarHeelEMT on Apr 8, 2011, 10:01 PM)


jt512


Apr 8, 2011, 10:09 PM
Post #484 of 509 (4558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).

really dumb question. I know there are studies linking moderate drinking, in general, to better health (in general). Just curious, though, and I'm not even sure how to ask the question clearly, how much of the benefit has to do with the ingredients over the alcohol itself?

In other words, with regards to wine, how much of the benefit is due to the grapes? Would grape juice (not the overly sugared kind) be a better substitute? And with beer, would barley, for instance, be better than beer?

I don't know what goes into other kinds of liquor necessarily, so I can't comment on things like high-quality vodka, whiskey, or pisco, etc..


The studies that I have seen seem to hint at the fact that its something about an "alcoholic drink" in general that confers benefit.

As I understand it, ethanol per se lowers LDL-cholesterol, which alone is responsible for much of the benefit.

In reply to:
I'm interested to hear what Jay thinks about this, but it's my opinion (decently well supported by the literature) that our use of reductionistic thinking in the realm of food & nutrition is misguided. We (at least many American & European societies) want to know what it is IN PARTICULAR that makes eating X food so beneficial.

Many of the studies I have seen in this light show that each time we find a food that is beneficial, pick (often seemingly at random) a nutrient unique to or at least in abundance in that food, and use it as a supplement, the beneficial results aren't replicated. This suggests that when we derive benefit from a food it isn't due to a single agent but rather to a multifactorial cause.

Well, to the extent that the benefits of certain foods are due to antioxidants you have to be careful, because the oxidation–reduction effects of so-called antioxidants depend on their concentration and the concentration of other redox agents in their environment. Beta-carotene would not be expected to have the same biological effect when taken in large dose as a supplement as it would in more modest amounts as part of a mixture of redox agents in a whole food.

In reply to:
There are some foods we have identified as beneficial AND have been able to identify a single agent. Often (though not always) these foods were pretty simple to start with- like certain plant oils providing cardio-protective effects. We have replicated these effects with a single substance, omega 3 FA. Great, but the oils weren't exactly a complicated mix to start with.

There are complex foods where it is still unclear how much of the benefit comes from what constituents. Nuts, for instance, almost certainly confer a health benefit by way of their fatty acid profile, but whether the non-fat constituents of nuts confer a significant health benefit is still unclear.

Jay


altelis


Apr 8, 2011, 10:24 PM
Post #485 of 509 (4551 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.

Nonsense. What paleolithic diet website have you been visiting?

Jay

Not in the field myself, but everything I've been taught in pharmacology, physiology and cardio-vascular medicine in the last 3 years supports TarHeel's claim.

I'm sure I'll get flack from Jay with this appeal to authority, but to strengthen the "authority", everything I saw cited in this regard was recent, and taught by experts in the field who are VERY EBM driven...


Gmburns2000


Apr 8, 2011, 11:26 PM
Post #486 of 509 (4540 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
enigma wrote:

In reference to alcohol in moderation, how much? types?

Any type. The equivalent of two glasses of wine per day.

Just to make it clear, this is NUANCED, and depends on your gender.

Males: equivalent of 1-2 glasses of wine per day.

Women: equivalent of 1 glass of wine per day AND ONLY IF THEY CONCURRENTLY HAVE @ LEAST 400microg of folate.

All the studies I've seen showed negative effects for women consuming >1 glass per day, and for any amount without proper folate (NOT related to potential for pregnancy).

really dumb question. I know there are studies linking moderate drinking, in general, to better health (in general). Just curious, though, and I'm not even sure how to ask the question clearly, how much of the benefit has to do with the ingredients over the alcohol itself?

In other words, with regards to wine, how much of the benefit is due to the grapes? Would grape juice (not the overly sugared kind) be a better substitute? And with beer, would barley, for instance, be better than beer?

I don't know what goes into other kinds of liquor necessarily, so I can't comment on things like high-quality vodka, whiskey, or pisco, etc..


The studies that I have seen seem to hint at the fact that its something about an "alcoholic drink" in general that confers benefit.

I'm interested to hear what Jay thinks about this, but it's my opinion (decently well supported by the literature) that our use of reductionistic thinking in the realm of food & nutrition is misguided. We (at least many American & European societies) want to know what it is IN PARTICULAR that makes eating X food so beneficial.

Many of the studies I have seen in this light show that each time we find a food that is beneficial, pick (often seemingly at random) a nutrient unique to or at least in abundance in that food, and use it as a supplement, the beneficial results aren't replicated. This suggests that when we derive benefit from a food it isn't due to a single agent but rather to a multifactorial cause.

There are some foods we have identified as beneficial AND have been able to identify a single agent. Often (though not always) these foods were pretty simple to start with- like certain plant oils providing cardio-protective effects. We have replicated these effects with a single substance, omega 3 FA. Great, but the oils weren't exactly a complicated mix to start with.

Interestingly, the converse tends to NOT be true. Typically, foods that we have identified as being HARMFUL to us typically do have ONE causative agent. And removing that agent removes/greatly reduces the harm conferred from that food.

hmmm...that's interesting. thanks.


jt512


Apr 9, 2011, 12:29 AM
Post #487 of 509 (4528 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
jt512 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.

Nonsense. What paleolithic diet website have you been visiting?

Jay

Not in the field myself, but everything I've been taught in pharmacology, physiology and cardio-vascular medicine in the last 3 years supports TarHeel's claim.

What?! HDL-cholesterol mediates reverse cholesterol transport. That's pretty basic biochemistry. It probably has other anti-atherogenic properties as well. Good summary here.

Additionally:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/407775_4
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/407775_5

And many, many other sources.

Jay


altelis


Apr 9, 2011, 1:51 PM
Post #488 of 509 (4466 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2168

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jay, of course that's the mechanism of action for HDL. It's not clear however that a simple absolute rise in HDL represents CAD protection.

The links you provided back this up. The VA-HIT show that the HDL increase needs to be accompanied by a TG reduction to be cardioprotective. AFCAPS/TexCAPS showed that HDL BELOW the recommended value has a negative risk associated with it, and that raising the HDL TO THE RECOMMENDED VALUE decreased their risk for CAD. But if I remember that study correctly (haven't read it in ~1 yr), their RR was returned to 1, that is they didn't "gain" cardioprotection, they just returned to normal.


jt512


Apr 9, 2011, 9:34 PM
Post #489 of 509 (4449 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [altelis] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

altelis wrote:
Jay, of course that's the mechanism of action for HDL. It's not clear however that a simple absolute rise in HDL represents CAD protection.

It is nearly impossible to prove such an effect, because you'd have to find an intervention that only affected HDL-C. Given the practical difficulty of such proof, the evidence of an actual cardioprotective effect of increasing HDL-C is about as strong as you can get. It is supported by biochemistry, animal models, epidemiology, and clinical trials.

In reply to:
The links you provided back this up.

You are selectively reading the literature and misinterpreting it.

In reply to:
The VA-HIT show that the HDL increase needs to be accompanied by a TG reduction to be cardioprotective.

No. It showed exactly the opposite: "[T]he reduction in nonfatal MI and CHD death was correlated with treatment concentrations of HDL-C but not triglycerides . . . [T]he only major lipid to predict a significant reduction in CHD events was HDL-C. . . . A similar conclusion was reported in the Helsinki Heart Study . . ."¹

In reply to:
AFCAPS/TexCAPS showed that HDL BELOW the recommended value has a negative risk associated with it, and that raising the HDL TO THE RECOMMENDED VALUE decreased their risk for CAD. But if I remember that study correctly (haven't read it in ~1 yr), their RR was returned to 1, that is they didn't "gain" cardioprotection, they just returned to normal.

I don't know where you're getting that from, and I don't fully understand it. The reference value for a relative risk—that is, the value that is designated to have a relative risk of 1—is arbitrary. What you say above seems to imply only that they found that there is a benefit to raising HDL-C to a certain level, but no benefit to raising it further.

In the AFCAPS/TexCAPS study there was a strong inverse relation in the placebo group between HDL-C and coronary events. Lovastatin increased HDL-C by an average of 6%, and reduced coronary events by about 40%, compared with placebo, among subjects in the lowest two tertiles of baseline HDL-C.²

If you think that they found something different, then please reread your sources. Then, if you still think they found something different, please provide a reference to where you're getting that information.

Jay

¹ Robins, et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1585–91.
² Downs, et al. JAMA. 1998;279:1615–22.


(This post was edited by jt512 on Apr 9, 2011, 11:13 PM)


jt512


Apr 10, 2011, 12:48 AM
Post #490 of 509 (4415 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease. There may be other factors as well. It's not completely understood.

Jay


While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.

Nonsense. What paleolithic diet website have you been visiting?

Jay


Three years of medical school and partway through an MPH.

The certainty of the claims you're making is vastly overstated.

I would put my "certainty" at about 85%. On the other hand, calling it "only hypothesized" seems to suggest that there is no evidence for it, when, in fact, there is a clear body of consistent evidence from epidemiology, biochemistry, clinical trials, animal studies, and even preliminary studies of infused HDL analogs in humans.

Jay


TarHeelEMT


Apr 10, 2011, 8:31 PM
Post #491 of 509 (4355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The idea that alcohol is cardioprotective is pretty well established. I never argued that and would counsel anyone who asked that it's almost certainly true.

You took it quite a few steps farther and asserted that one of the proposed mechanisms to explain the causation is factual. I'm sorry, but however plausible the idea that alcohol exerts its effects via HDL may be, it is still quite early in the game to be asserting it as fact. That's several steps ahead of where the published literature is right now.


A very good meta-analysis of studies relating alcohol consumption to cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality was very recently published, and it's probably worth a read for anyone interested in a sense of where we are right now. If our level of knowledge is as you claim, Jay, then there would have been little point in publishing it. It's free online at PubMed central.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/...3043109/?tool=pubmed


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043110/?tool=pmcentrez
Their companion paper looked specifically at biomarkers to investigate a mechanism. They specifically state in their limitations section than the evidence for mechanism is indirect, and is primarily being used to provide plausibility for the cardioprotective hypothesis. They haven't proven the mechanism and weren't trying to because the research just isn't there yet. The mechanism is still being established, and it is wrong to declare the hypothesis that HDL is causative as fact.


(This post was edited by TarHeelEMT on Apr 10, 2011, 8:36 PM)


TarHeelEMT


Apr 10, 2011, 8:34 PM
Post #492 of 509 (4354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
I would put my "certainty" at about 85%. On the other hand, calling it "only hypothesized" seems to suggest that there is no evidence for it, when, in fact, there is a clear body of consistent evidence from epidemiology, biochemistry, clinical trials, animal studies, and even preliminary studies of infused HDL analogs in humans.

Jay

Mine would be at about 98% for the cardioprotective hypothesis, and about 75% against all comers for HDL and fibrinogen to be the primary mediators.

There's a big difference between 85% and fact.


Care to take a deep breath and reexamine my initial statement?

While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.



Are you really saying you disagree with that? Rereading it myself, I probably should have been more clear in saying that I was referring to HDL being the mechanism of risk reduction for alcohol.


(This post was edited by TarHeelEMT on Apr 10, 2011, 9:21 PM)


jt512


Apr 11, 2011, 12:23 AM
Post #493 of 509 (4324 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
jt512 wrote:
I would put my "certainty" at about 85%. On the other hand, calling it "only hypothesized" seems to suggest that there is no evidence for it, when, in fact, there is a clear body of consistent evidence from epidemiology, biochemistry, clinical trials, animal studies, and even preliminary studies of infused HDL analogs in humans.

Jay

Mine would be at about 98% for the cardioprotective hypothesis, and about 75% against all comers for HDL and fibrinogen to be the primary mediators.

I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se.

In reply to:
There's a big difference between 85% and fact.

Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

In reply to:
Care to take a deep breath and reexamine my initial statement?

While it does raise HDL cholesterol, any causal link to reduced heart disease via this mechanism is only hypothesized, not proven.


Are you really saying you disagree with that? Rereading it myself, I probably should have been more clear in saying that I was referring to HDL being the mechanism of risk reduction for alcohol.

I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that it is known that alcohol raises HDL-C. Furthermore, the evidence that raising HDL-C has a cardioprotective effect is quite strong. Therefore, it is quite likely that the cardioprotective effect of alcohol is at least partly due to it raising HDL-C. That's not "proof," but it's more than "only hypothesized"; there is substantial evidence for it.

Jay


TarHeelEMT


Apr 12, 2011, 9:04 PM
Post #494 of 509 (4281 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.


jt512


Apr 12, 2011, 9:31 PM
Post #495 of 509 (4272 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because [alcohol] increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease.

I agree that it doesn't necessarily follow, but alcohol does raise HDL-C, and raising HDL-C is cardioprtotective. Therefore, alcohol consumption would be expected to lower heart disease risk, and to do so by raising HDL-C.

In principle, alcohol could not be cardioprotective if it had an offsetting adverse affect on heart disease risk by some other mechanism. However, epidemiological evidence consistently shows that those who drink alcohol have lower rates of heart disease than non-drinkers, so there is no evidence for such an offsetting detrimental effect.

Jay


aprice00


Apr 12, 2011, 11:05 PM
Post #496 of 509 (4257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.


enigma


Apr 12, 2011, 11:15 PM
Post #497 of 509 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.

Yes, Of course !


aprice00


Apr 12, 2011, 11:38 PM
Post #498 of 509 (4244 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.

Yes, Of course !
Why is it that Im bothered by you agreeing w/ me?


TarHeelEMT


Apr 13, 2011, 2:26 AM
Post #499 of 509 (4227 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.

A hypothesis has to be consistent with available evidence. Since the amount of information on lipid metabolism and coronary artery disease is quite substantial, any reasonable hypothesis on a subject as broad as how alcohol affects CAD risk will by necessity be based on a great deal of evidence.


(This post was edited by TarHeelEMT on Apr 13, 2011, 2:27 AM)


chadnsc


Apr 13, 2011, 2:56 AM
Post #500 of 509 (3704 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.

Yes, Of course !

Give me a break. You didn't understand anything in the above post.


enigma


Apr 13, 2011, 9:19 AM
Post #501 of 509 (2742 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [chadnsc] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chadnsc wrote:
enigma wrote:
aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
In reply to:
I didn't realize you were talking about alcohol. I thought you were talking about HDL-C per se

Haha, no. My fault for not being more clear.


In reply to:
Right. I never said I was certain. You said I was certain.

I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because it increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease. You did acknowledge that it was more complicated than that, so I probably didn't give you enough credit for nuance.


In reply to:
I agree that it's not proven, but I think that the phrase "only hypothesized" is misleading.

It depends. I'm ok with saying it, because to me the word hypothesis implies at least a reasonable body of evidence, with many carrying a substantial body of evidence. Different people have different understandings of the term, though, and I suppose RC.com is not a place where you'd assume I was speaking with that understanding.

Kind of a moot point for the topic but since when does a hypothesis imply "a reasonable body of evidence"? It doesn't even depend on you definition of reasonable. The term hypothesis, especially in the scientific field has Zero contingencies on evidence. Really a hypothesis can be a total shot in the dark. A hypothesis can be merely conjecture.
I know its just semantics but you need to be right when you try to take an authoritative position.

Yes, Of course !

Give me a break. You didn't understand anything in the above post.

All hypothesis is an explanation for the occurrence of some observation, or scientific problem you expect to happen through testing.

You make an experiment and then test the theory, conjecture refers to an inference, judgment or guesswork based on inconclusive or incomplete evidence.
In this particular discussion it refers to increasing serum HDL-cholesterol so it is protective against heart disease.
( TarHeelEmt- is acknowledging that he didn't realize
that it was about alcohol.) He thought that the discussion was in reference to HDL-C per/se.

Additionally, he is saying that since serum HDL-cholesterol is protective against heart disease, it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease,
Acknowledging that there are other variables /nuances involved, and it is more complicated .

Finally. the argument hinges on what is being put forth is only an hypothesis, so it can be a total shot in the dark.
It could be just conjecture, which is guesswork or incomplete evidence.
Thereby, the poster is saying that you need to be right. Since when you take an authoritative position since it could be misleading. .


enigma


Apr 13, 2011, 9:25 AM
Post #502 of 509 (2740 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
I'm pretty sure what got me going was the statement "For one thing, because [alcohol] increases serum HDL-cholesterol, so it's protective against heart disease.," since it doesn't necessarily follow that anything that raises HDL is protective against heart disease.

I agree that it doesn't necessarily follow, but alcohol does raise HDL-C, and raising HDL-C is cardioprtotective. Therefore, alcohol consumption would be expected to lower heart disease risk, and to do so by raising HDL-C.

In principle, alcohol could not be cardioprotective if it had an offsetting adverse affect on heart disease risk by some other mechanism. However, epidemiological evidence consistently shows that those who drink alcohol have lower rates of heart disease than non-drinkers, so there is no evidence for such an offsetting detrimental effect.

Jay


Well , This sounds right.


aprice00


Apr 13, 2011, 5:15 PM
Post #503 of 509 (2710 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2010
Posts: 167

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
A hypothesis has to be consistent with available evidence.

This is where I disagree. A hypothesis does not need to be supported, but since you said

TarHeelEMT wrote:
to me the word hypotheses implies at least a reasonable body of evidence

I cant really say your opinion is wrong.
The only problem I had was you implying that the scientific community has the same interpretation of the word.

Ultimatly I agree that most hypothesis from creditable scientists are formed in light of supporting information.
Edit: Sp


(This post was edited by aprice00 on Apr 13, 2011, 6:56 PM)


enigma


Apr 14, 2011, 3:47 AM
Post #504 of 509 (2682 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [aprice00] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aprice00 wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
A hypothesis has to be consistent with available evidence.

This is where I disagree. A hypothesis does not need to be supported, but since you said

TarHeelEMT wrote:
to me the word hypotheses implies at least a reasonable body of evidence

I cant really say your opinion is wrong.
The only problem I had was you implying that the scientific community has the same interpretation of the word.

Ultimatly I agree that most hypothesis from creditable scientists are formed in light of supporting information.
Edit: Sp



So, what do you disagree with?
Or are you just going around in circles with the word hypothesis and the scientific community?


TarHeelEMT


May 26, 2011, 10:23 PM
Post #505 of 509 (2622 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [jt512] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
This came out today, and I figured it was worth putting on here as a reminder for why caution is advised when talking about why something works in medicine.

http://news.yahoo.com/...med_cholesterol_drug

The NIH just stopped the most powerful niacin study to date because although it raised HDL significantly, it didn't reduce heart attacks or angioplasties and actually led to a small increase in strokes.

With alcohol and cardioprotection, there is a lot more to the story than HDL. It's easy to point our fingers at HDL levels of alcohol users and say we've found our answer because it fits with theory, but we can't say for certain until we sort out why artificially modifying HDL levels by other means doesn't work.


enigma


May 27, 2011, 6:05 AM
Post #506 of 509 (2578 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [TarHeelEMT] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

TarHeelEMT wrote:
This came out today, and I figured it was worth putting on here as a reminder for why caution is advised when talking about why something works in medicine.

http://news.yahoo.com/...med_cholesterol_drug

The NIH just stopped the most powerful niacin study to date because although it raised HDL significantly, it didn't reduce heart attacks or angioplasties and actually led to a small increase in strokes.

With alcohol and cardioprotection, there is a lot more to the story than HDL. It's easy to point our fingers at HDL levels of alcohol users and say we've found our answer because it fits with theory, but we can't say for certain until we sort out why artificially modifying HDL levels by other means doesn't work.

Well that's too bad . It would have been good if the niacin lowered this risk of heart attacks. and it was odd that a small percentage actually had more strokes.
Maybe they didn't do a control for the diets within the group! Or I don't see smoking, or other factors mentioned. Could be a flawed study without double blind controls included.


gmggg


May 27, 2011, 1:24 PM
Post #507 of 509 (2559 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [enigma] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

enigma wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
This came out today, and I figured it was worth putting on here as a reminder for why caution is advised when talking about why something works in medicine.

http://news.yahoo.com/...med_cholesterol_drug

The NIH just stopped the most powerful niacin study to date because although it raised HDL significantly, it didn't reduce heart attacks or angioplasties and actually led to a small increase in strokes.

With alcohol and cardioprotection, there is a lot more to the story than HDL. It's easy to point our fingers at HDL levels of alcohol users and say we've found our answer because it fits with theory, but we can't say for certain until we sort out why artificially modifying HDL levels by other means doesn't work.

Well that's too bad . It would have been good if the niacin lowered this risk of heart attacks. and it was odd that a small percentage actually had more strokes.
Maybe they didn't do a control for the diets within the group! Or I don't see smoking, or other factors mentioned. Could be a flawed study without double blind controls included.

I'd be amused to hear what you think this means.


enigma


Jun 22, 2011, 8:53 AM
Post #508 of 509 (2496 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2279

Re: [gmggg] Climbers who eat meat vs vegetarian [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
enigma wrote:
TarHeelEMT wrote:
This came out today, and I figured it was worth putting on here as a reminder for why caution is advised when talking about why something works in medicine.

http://news.yahoo.com/...med_cholesterol_drug

The NIH just stopped the most powerful niacin study to date because although it raised HDL significantly, it didn't reduce heart attacks or angioplasties and actually led to a small increase in strokes.

With alcohol and cardioprotection, there is a lot more to the story than HDL. It's easy to point our fingers at HDL levels of alcohol users and say we've found our answer because it fits with theory, but we can't say for certain until we sort out why artificially modifying HDL levels by other means doesn't work.

Well that's too bad . It would have been good if the niacin lowered this risk of heart attacks. and it was odd that a small percentage actually had more strokes.
Maybe they didn't do a control for the diets within the group! Or I don't see smoking, or other factors mentioned. Could be a flawed study without double blind controls included.

I'd be amused to hear what you think this means.


All it means is the subject (person) dosen't know if they are getting niacin/medicine or the placebo.
As well as the research staff that are giving out the placebo or in this case niacin (or whatever supplement or medicine).
This is done to help insure the study is not accidentally/unconsciously (influenced by either the participants or the research study staff).


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook