Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Leave your damn kids at home
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


climberguy2011


Aug 3, 2009, 11:34 PM
Post #1 of 357 (18896 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Leave your damn kids at home
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (29 ratings)  
Can't Post

So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.
Attachments: DSC02875.JPG (96.7 KB)


bill413


Aug 3, 2009, 11:43 PM
Post #2 of 357 (18879 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

FU.

I agree that uncontrolled kids are annoying pretty much anywhere. But, they are more a part of the family than the dogs. Do you rant about them?

I've seen kids from a few months to 20 years old (at least) coming to the crags with their parents. I think it's good for them to be exposed to the sport, to the outdoors, to what their parents enjoy.


curt


Aug 3, 2009, 11:51 PM
Post #3 of 357 (18850 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Just wait till you have kids. I hope somebody reads this back to you. Cool

Curt


codhands


Aug 3, 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #4 of 357 (18839 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 21, 2005
Posts: 499

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

I second the FU. I have two kids age 3.5 and 5.5 and both are very interested and good at climbing. If you were a real hardman you would be climbing where it would be nearly impossible for those self serving jerk breeders to take their snotnosed little little inconsiderate parasites called children. That last part was for your benefit by BTW. Also, swearing doesn't make you cool.Smile


kriso9tails


Aug 3, 2009, 11:56 PM
Post #5 of 357 (18836 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's more an issue of teaching your kids to behave than leaving them at home. Do poorly behaved kids and parents that won't take responsibility for them really belong anywhere in particular?

I've seen adults that throw rocks at inappropriate places, run around screaming, cry and are a general nuisance. Usually it's someone throwing a tantrum on a route that's over their head. The only difference between these people and little children is that little children can generally be talked to and reasoned with. Bad behavior is bad behavior for the most part. It's true of adults, of kids, of dogs... of whatever.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 4, 2009, 12:03 AM
Post #6 of 357 (18822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

1. What makes you think that you as a person are more entitled to being at any particular public place than another person who happens to be 5 years old?

2. You are entitled to be annoyed by certain things-- I have my own list, too. I suggest you anticipate these things and take steps to avoid them, instead of expecting other people to stay away in order for you to have a good day. How about going for a longer approach?

3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

4. You do not have kids, so you can't possibly understand the educational value to kids who are exposed to a variety of situations and see their parents enjoy various activities.

5. There are obnoxious children everywhere, and even the best kids can and do have bad days. The same is true for all adults. When dealing with abnoxious individuals of any age, your best bet is a polite mention to adults in charge. You would be surprized how effective this can be. However, if it doesn't work, go back to point 2.


6. Unless you are under 20yo, and still have some hope of growing up, I suggest that you take steps to make sure that not having kids is a permanent fact for you.

7. I am pretty sure my daughter will outclimb you by the time she is 8yo. She is 6yo now.


knieveltech


Aug 4, 2009, 12:08 AM
Post #7 of 357 (18811 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Nope. Not buying it.

All of the following are fair game for a rant:
- Crag dogs
- Boom Boxes
- Gibbering clots of gumbies
- Spraylord bullshit


Children, on the other hand, are perfectly acceptable. Hell, it's unusual these days to see parents willing to spend quality time with their kids outdoors. Props to em. If you don't like it do what most folks do when I break out the lycra at the crag: find somewhere else to climb.


jakedatc


Aug 4, 2009, 12:08 AM
Post #8 of 357 (18811 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [bill413] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

FU.

I agree that uncontrolled kids are annoying pretty much anywhere. But, they are more a part of the family than the dogs. Do you rant about them?

I've seen kids from a few months to 20 years old (at least) coming to the crags with their parents. I think it's good for them to be exposed to the sport, to the outdoors, to what their parents enjoy.

I've only seen set ups like that at the Meadows and where it was one kid in a playpen with one parent. I wouldn't think someone would haul all that shit up higher. I probably woulda been pissed too..

Would you have posted the same thing if the child that fell 5 feet was at Bonsai and took a 30 footer off the ledge and had been seriously injured or worse?


erisspirit


Aug 4, 2009, 12:10 AM
Post #9 of 357 (18807 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

That is more of an issue of parenting. Not teaching them to be well behaved, and not being attentive. If the children were well behaved, and the 3rd adult in the group payed attention, took them on a hike, or helped them climb, would it have been so terrible?
Seems like the biggest issue was they were loud, disrespectful, and ill supervised.

The main reason I love the outdoors so much is my parents took me out to the mountains every Sunday. It is one of my fondest memories, and I doubt I would be as attached to the wilderness if it wasn't for that.

Anywhere can be a dangerous environment for a child... even their own home.


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 12:19 AM
Post #10 of 357 (18791 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (10 ratings)  
Can't Post

Swearing does make you look kools. I dont like or dislike kids, but would rather not be around them climbing. Simply because swear sometimes, Ok alot, and the last thing I want to hear is," HEY watch your mouth there are kids here." Like I give a shit. I usually tell parents in this case. I am not going to watch what I say I am not in court or church. Like you would find me in church anyways. They usually pack up. If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets. If the parents yell at you Yell back. Show those little fuckers that you have a freedom of speech and you intend on exercising your right. This thould help fuel your fireAngelic


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 12:23 AM
Post #11 of 357 (18778 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't mind kids at certain crags and as a parent, their noise and activity don't really bother me all that much if at all.

But there is a safety issue and I have seen parents put their kids into accelerated risk zones. Hell I've done it too.

If you REALLY want to know what its like to be a parent, watch a season's worth of Malcom in the Middle reruns. This will remind you brother... of yourself.

I agree generally that parents should not take their kids to busy crags until the kid can operate reasonably independantly and not get in other climbers way or play in fall zones

Throwing rocks is border line - sorta depends on circumstance then.

Mate did you say something to them or just simmer and burn? I've done both of that too.

DMT


irregularpanda


Aug 4, 2009, 12:24 AM
Post #12 of 357 (18778 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: 1364

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey man,

I think you need to go climbing elsewhere, cuz fighting this is like fighting the tide. It's not gonna change anything. Did you even talk to the parents about your issue, did you approach them and confront them about the disturbance and "danger" involved?

Either that or you need a lawn and a rocking chair to go with your porch, so you can yell at small children who dare to walk on your precious turf.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 12:32 AM
Post #13 of 357 (18757 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [subantz] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

subantz wrote:
...If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets...

It's "Tourette's"...you butt-plugging douche nozzle.

Curt


Neel


Aug 4, 2009, 12:39 AM
Post #14 of 357 (18728 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 22, 2008
Posts: 116

Re: [bill413] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
I agree that uncontrolled kids are annoying pretty much anywhere. But, they are more a part of the family than the dogs. Do you rant about them?

I've seen kids from a few months to 20 years old (at least) coming to the crags with their parents. I think it's good for them to be exposed to the sport, to the outdoors, to what their parents enjoy.

QFT. I dont mind dogs, as long as their owners can control them. I'ts great that people are exposing their kids to the sport.

A couple things though -
1. if the kids are doing something that's bugging you or you think is potentially unsafe, politely tell their parents.

2. I agree with one thing... I try to keep my language clean when kids are around, but once in a while you'll rip from a hold and scream some explicit things. If parents are bringing their kids to the crag, it's somewhat expected they're going to hear some 4 letter words here and there.


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 12:42 AM
Post #15 of 357 (18720 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

For the most part I do agree. Teach your kids how to act. I realize that kids are kids, but if you put those kids into a hazardous environment, you better teach them what to do and what not to do. Don't be mad at the kids, it's the parents that need to take control and educate their children. If they can't be left alone while you climb or belay then they aren't old enough, mature enough, or interested enough to be there.

Also, the rock is a public place. If you can't handle some other people losing their cool every once in awhile then you need to catch up with the times because you are going to find some sort of bad language at most public places that have young people, unfortunately. You can even find it on cable television which children generally have access to. Oh Noo! Hurry put a password lock on TBS before the children turn to lives of crime!!

If you weren't used to shrill screams and irritating nuisances then you would understand why other people get pissed. But you don't remember what it's like to not have kids so don't assume everyone has the same tolerance for irrating loud noises. How would you like it if I watched a basketball game on a surround sound while you tried to do yoga.

I don't have kids but I hope that when I do have kids, I don't assume everyone else does and wants to put up with your kids' distractions. How would you like it if I brought a huge stereo and blared the thong song for part of the day? I'm just saying that it's happened to me with a huge group of middle school girls. If you honestly think me yelling "shit" or "fuck" out of my own frustration in front of you and your kids is more offensive to the ear than listening to them scream and yell for an hour than you're simply delusional and I'm wanting to have kids less and less and I speak.

On the other side of things, as I said before it's a public place so if people can get their screaming toddlers there, then they may bring them (I wouldn't though w/ some of the approaches I've been on). I have to say that an annoying barking dog and an annoying screaming kid have a similar effects on my mood after a period of time when I'm in the zone. Dogs are awesome (I have/had several), just don't bring them if they are going to bark until you come back down.

In your situation I would've probably told them to get control of their children and would've apologized for cursing. Solved.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 12:45 AM
Post #16 of 357 (18714 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
subantz wrote:
...If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets...

It's "Tourette's"...you butt-plugging douche nozzle.

Curt

Lol. That was Bristol Fashion Sir, straight up Bristol.

DMT


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 1:01 AM
Post #17 of 357 (18665 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey, mudder trucker. Its what I says it is britch. OK let me appologize in advance. I loves to push da buttons. I simply enjoy to push and pull till someone gets offended. YOU WIN CURT. I was out with a kids summer camp over the past week. I watched my mouth and was well mannered. We all know in our right mind swearing around children is bad. I do not intentionaly curse around kids. I was trolling, yup I admit to it and you took the bait. NEXT.


shorty


Aug 4, 2009, 1:06 AM
Post #18 of 357 (18657 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 1266

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions.

Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

It is unfortunate that we don't have a magic time machine which would allow us to:

1. see you during your pre-school years. I suspect you were a model of behavior.

2. see you with your future children during their pre-school years. I suspect they will be models of behavior.

3. see you during said recent climbs. I suspect you were a model of responsibility, who in no way would ever annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 1:07 AM
Post #19 of 357 (18652 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [subantz] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

subantz wrote:
...I was trolling, yup I admit to it and you took the bait. NEXT.

Sure, misspelling can often be confused with trolling.

Curt


tradrenn


Aug 4, 2009, 1:07 AM
Post #20 of 357 (18648 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990

Re: [codhands] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

codhands wrote:
I second the FU.

Third.


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 1:14 AM
Post #21 of 357 (18632 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1. To lazy to do a spell check
2 cant read or write.
I vote for somewhere in between 1 and 5 but lean torward 3.


ACJ


Aug 4, 2009, 1:19 AM
Post #22 of 357 (18622 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2008
Posts: 162

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think your going a little over the top, there are bound to be some responsible adults out there.

Anyway, this is what I experienced today...

A sketchy summer camp full of crappy staff leading trips to the local crag. Then I looked on in horror as the staff teach the kids how to carve their names into the rock and knock over widow maker trees while they wait for their turn to "race" up the 4th class terrain that they put on top rope.

Now somebody needs to revoke their commercial permit to climb in the national forests...


CrazyPetie


Aug 4, 2009, 1:38 AM
Post #23 of 357 (18589 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think kids should be exposed to the outdoors and climbing and such.. HOWEVER i'm with climberguy on this one i think.

Someone told you to watch your language around their kids at the crag? Thats would piss me off. Especially these days, kids are gonna learn "bad words" regardless of over protective sheltering. We're outside lady. Climbers swear. Goto the gym if you want your kids to have a christian climbing experiance.

Maybe if they just brought one kid that was well behaved, and who was there to learn to climb. I know i would deffinately be climbing elsewhere if 3 toddlers showed up.

Yea i was a shithead as a kid, who wasn't. I bet i annoyed alot of people. Climbing is a relaxing and peacful environment, it would be like bringing crying children to a movie.


peg_leg1


Aug 4, 2009, 1:42 AM
Post #24 of 357 (18586 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2006
Posts: 21

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

You my friend are an idiot. God forbid that you ever reproduce. If you ever find someone shallow enough to mate with, what would you do if you had your kid, no babysitter, and really wanted to go climbing? I bet all of a sudden it would be OK, wouldn't it? Some childless friends might have bitched if I brought my kids to the crags, but now that they have kids it's cool.
Also, if you could focus enough to drown out the kids, maybe you would climb harder. If you have anymore bitching to do, go down to the Gunks and talk to the Family Climbing crowd.
BTW those kids that you bitch about are climbing 5.11's at 10 years old.


(This post was edited by peg_leg1 on Aug 4, 2009, 2:13 AM)


krazyk011


Aug 4, 2009, 1:43 AM
Post #25 of 357 (18585 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2005
Posts: 68

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Dude, I bet you are probably more annoying than most families with kids i've come across at the crag. I can't tell you how many 'adults' have pissed me off at the crag. I do agree that bringing 3 kids out without any other adults to help is probably not the best of ideas and would surely piss me off too... but-

my wife and I climb, and bring our 8 month old out on every trip. you bet your ass we bring toys and tent. She is awesome and loves to be outside at the crag. granted she is young but none the less, we manage her well. We are quite responsible and keep her happy. Shes got just as much right to be there as you. So, in that case, fuck YOU for thinking you are so privileged. Go the fuck back to gym (or to the Red) where all you elitist people think you own every cliff you flop up... and quit your bitching. its people like you that annoy ME.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 1:47 AM
Post #26 of 357 (6511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [krazyk011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You should have cut off your post right before this part. Makes you sound like just as much of a dick... and I know all about sounding like a dick from first hand experience.

krazyk011 wrote:
Go the fuck back to gym (or to the Red) where all you elitist people think you own every cliff you flop up... and quit your bitching. its people like you that annoy ME.


jakedatc


Aug 4, 2009, 1:55 AM
Post #27 of 357 (6505 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [krazyk011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

So all of you are ok with inattentive parents letting 3 toddlers wander around a crag throwing rocks, crying and almost injuring themselves. that's cool.

A few months ago i was part of a group with a 3 yr old. Group of 4 adults one being the parent. She barely made a peep longer than 10 seconds the whole weekend. We all took turns taking care of her and making sure she was playing safely and not crying. When she did try to do something wrong she was told not to and why not.. she will learn much more than those kids screaming and throwing rocks with no intervention.

I think the point of the guy's post was the inattentive parents and the reckless and unsafe behavior of the kids. not that they were actually there.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 1:59 AM
Post #28 of 357 (6501 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [CrazyPetie] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

CrazyPetie wrote:
Yea i was a shithead as a kid...

Sounds like you still are.

Curt


onceahardman


Aug 4, 2009, 1:59 AM
Post #29 of 357 (6498 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Public land means EVERYBODY can go there.

Don't like climbing with kids? Buy your own crag, and post it. Just think how much fun you could have, all alone.

I'm sure you never threw a stone when you were a kid.

Jackass.


jamincan


Aug 4, 2009, 2:17 AM
Post #30 of 357 (6483 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207

Re: [onceahardman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I do think it's important to have an adult who can supervise the kids. I recall a couple with one child at the Red two years ago. Their daughter was generally well behaved, but tripped and stubbed her toe or scraped her knee or received some other minor injury. Unfortunately, mom was half way up the route, and dad was belaying her, and there was no one who could console her.

On the other hand, I think it's great to bring kids outside and instill an early appreciation for nature.


dynosore


Aug 4, 2009, 2:28 AM
Post #31 of 357 (6472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'd rather be around little kids than a grown up (?) that swears as he hangdogs his way up a 5.11 bolted chosspile. At least the kids have an excuse for being annoying, they aren't old enough to know better. I bet you're just mad because the 5 year old onsighted your long-standing project.


chrisJoosse


Aug 4, 2009, 2:44 AM
Post #32 of 357 (6457 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 150

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Let me add another FU to the chorus.

I am just as interested in having a good time as you, and I am fervently committed to not being one of 'those &@#$%*parents', but if you can't get along when reasonably-regulated kids are around, that's your problem.
Fortunately, when I bring my boy to the crag, I am encouraged by an approving community. And I do hope that if you have a safety (or really any sort of) concern about me or my boy that you'd let me know, rather than bitching about it later on teh interwebz. At least that would be useful.

My wife and I both climb and so does our son. He's not old enough to be unsupervised, so we bring friends willing to take turns on the wall and with him. So far, we've managed to have things work out so that he's always with a responsible adult and well away from the foot of the crag, unless of course he's on the rock, roped and climbing. (yes, with a cute little body harness and helmet)

Now I'll agree with you 100% that unregulated kids throwing rocks and putting themselves or others in danger is intolerable- which begs the question: why did you tolerate it? I understand that other peoples' kids shouldn't be your problem, but if you've got a legit concern over safety and you say nothing, I really wouldn't be surprised if your conscience gives you hell for it- and your conscience is really your own problem, 'cause you know it's right. (and that's really easy to resent, yessirreebob)


dudemanbu


Aug 4, 2009, 2:48 AM
Post #33 of 357 (6452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2005
Posts: 941

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
So all of you are ok with inattentive parents letting 3 toddlers wander around a crag throwing rocks, crying and almost injuring themselves. that's cool.

A few months ago i was part of a group with a 3 yr old. Group of 4 adults one being the parent. She barely made a peep longer than 10 seconds the whole weekend. We all took turns taking care of her and making sure she was playing safely and not crying. When she did try to do something wrong she was told not to and why not.. she will learn much more than those kids screaming and throwing rocks with no intervention.

I think the point of the guy's post was the inattentive parents and the reckless and unsafe behavior of the kids. not that they were actually there.

+1


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 2:48 AM
Post #34 of 357 (6447 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [subantz] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

subantz wrote:
I was trolling, yup I admit to it and you took the bait. NEXT.

Tourette's syndrome?????

Get it, motherfucker?

DMT


bigevilgrape


Aug 4, 2009, 2:50 AM
Post #35 of 357 (6441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (9 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location.

lena_chita wrote:
3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip

The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.


(This post was edited by bigevilgrape on Aug 4, 2009, 2:51 AM)


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 2:52 AM
Post #36 of 357 (6434 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, your damn dogs too!


krazyk011


Aug 4, 2009, 2:53 AM
Post #37 of 357 (6430 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2005
Posts: 68

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yea, probably..

maybe next time i'll leave out the swearing?


Basta916


Aug 4, 2009, 3:15 AM
Post #38 of 357 (6395 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 311

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
So all of you are ok with inattentive parents letting 3 toddlers wander around a crag throwing rocks, crying and almost injuring themselves. that's cool.

A few months ago i was part of a group with a 3 yr old. Group of 4 adults one being the parent. She barely made a peep longer than 10 seconds the whole weekend. We all took turns taking care of her and making sure she was playing safely and not crying. When she did try to do something wrong she was told not to and why not.. she will learn much more than those kids screaming and throwing rocks with no intervention.

I think the point of the guy's post was the inattentive parents and the reckless and unsafe behavior of the kids. not that they were actually there.
+1
Amen!!!
glad to see some people take care of there children in public places.
It's becoming a lost art.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 3:18 AM
Post #39 of 357 (6391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [krazyk011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I got nothing against that; in context I thought the rest of your post was right on the mark. I just didn't see the point of bringing the Red or raggin' on gym climbers... at least not in this thread.


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 3:32 AM
Post #40 of 357 (6379 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (8 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think a few of the righteous FUs and "you obviously don't have kids" dismissals are missing the point.

Kids, by definition, are spazzes. Cute, but they know not what they do. Even kids who are pretty good more often than not can be a handful. I can't blame them. The crag is a fun place to be, and they see the adults having fun, so why act like they're in church?

This is why they need adults to look after them, role model and reel them in if necessary. Children need to be controlled when they're at the crag, the gym, the grocery store, the movies, the county jail waiting area, whatever. If you can do that, great. If you can't, leave the kids at home. If you can't leave the kids at home and enjoy your activity, then you stay home too. Because life is just really unfair like that, you know?

I don't have children, but I don't mind them. I actually find them pretty enjoyable once they're old enough to have a conversation with you. It's just a courtesy thing. I've seen uncontrolled kids screaming and stampeding and throwing rocks at the crag and wanted to beat their PARENTS like a pinata (they were already hanging like one, so all I needed was a stick). I've also seen kids just chillin', digging in the dirt with their Hot Wheels and eating their fruit snacks away from the belay hang. And I felt no hostility whatsoever. I'd rather a whole field trip of quiet, respectful first-graders than one "I just got my lead card" douchebag and his screeching belay slave girlfriend having an epic on a warm-up.

That might be elitist, but it's hardly elitist to expect adults to be in control of their children at all times.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 3:34 AM
Post #41 of 357 (6375 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
I think a few of the righteous FUs and "you obviously don't have kids" dismissals are missing the point.

Kids, by definition, are spazzes. Cute, but they know not what they do.

True, but we love you anyway. Cool

Curt


dudemanbu


Aug 4, 2009, 3:42 AM
Post #42 of 357 (6360 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2005
Posts: 941

Re: [Basta916] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Basta916 wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
So all of you are ok with inattentive parents letting 3 toddlers wander around a crag throwing rocks, crying and almost injuring themselves. that's cool.

A few months ago i was part of a group with a 3 yr old. Group of 4 adults one being the parent. She barely made a peep longer than 10 seconds the whole weekend. We all took turns taking care of her and making sure she was playing safely and not crying. When she did try to do something wrong she was told not to and why not.. she will learn much more than those kids screaming and throwing rocks with no intervention.

I think the point of the guy's post was the inattentive parents and the reckless and unsafe behavior of the kids. not that they were actually there.
+1
Amen!!!
glad to see some people take care of there children in public places.
It's becoming a lost art.

Just to keep count, that's +3 for jake.


(This post was edited by dudemanbu on Aug 4, 2009, 3:42 AM)


Partner climboard


Aug 4, 2009, 3:44 AM
Post #43 of 357 (6355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Bwahahah- you got shushed by a soccer mom and it tweaked you so hard that you had to go on an epic rant on the interwebz.

Did the toddlers throwing rocks all of three feet really scare you that much?

Oh, and FU.


CrazyPetie


Aug 4, 2009, 3:45 AM
Post #44 of 357 (6353 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
CrazyPetie wrote:
Yea i was a shithead as a kid...

Sounds like you still are.

Curt

Thanks for throwin that in there. You're cool.


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 3:47 AM
Post #45 of 357 (6350 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I think a few of the righteous FUs and "you obviously don't have kids" dismissals are missing the point.

Kids, by definition, are spazzes. Cute, but they know not what they do.

True, but we love you anyway. Cool

Curt
Your kid has never pissed me off at the crags. Sure, he looks just like you but the poor little man can't help that. Cool

At least he's clearly had good parents.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 3:49 AM
Post #46 of 357 (6345 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [CrazyPetie] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

CrazyPetie wrote:
curt wrote:
CrazyPetie wrote:
Yea i was a shithead as a kid...

Sounds like you still are.

Curt

Thanks for throwin that in there. You're cool.

You're welcome.

Curt


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 3:52 AM
Post #47 of 357 (6342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
curt wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I think a few of the righteous FUs and "you obviously don't have kids" dismissals are missing the point.

Kids, by definition, are spazzes. Cute, but they know not what they do.

True, but we love you anyway. Cool

Curt
Your kid has never pissed me off at the crags. Sure, he looks just like you but the poor little man can't help that. Cool

At least he's clearly had good parents.

Thanks. By the way, the "poor little man" doesn't turn 13 until next month and is already 5'10" tall, 175lbs and wears size 12 shoes.

Curt


Kartessa


Aug 4, 2009, 3:53 AM
Post #48 of 357 (6339 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow... thats is some serious douche-baggery if I've ever seen any.

Why not bitch and moan to the parents instead of your virtual friends on the interwebs? Did you just follow them to get more and more reasons to fume all to yourself? Did you take notes so you could accurately report back to people who don't give a shit?

FU


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 3:57 AM
Post #49 of 357 (6333 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Just wait till you have kids. I hope somebody reads this back to you. Cool

Curt

I've read this entire thread, and this post is the most glaring of the lot. The whole elitist "i'm better then you because i've procreated and your can't possibly understand what it's like to bring a child to adulthood mentality is a) disgusting, and b) sorely misguided.
No, I don't have kids. The planet is over-populated as it is, and furthering the status quo will accomplish nothing. Your feeble cries of "fuck you" do not affect me, much like the fingers and honks of rush hour do not affect me.
In reply to:
3. You obviously don't have kids, blah blah blah i have kids and therefore i am better than you...

4. You do not have kids, so see above, scumbag
Can you let your judgment of me relate to some principle beyond the fact that I haven't allowed my chromosomes to join with an X chromosome and produce the miracle of life?
knieveltech wrote:
Nope. Not buying it.

All of the following are fair game for a rant:
- Crag dogs
- Boom Boxes
- Gibbering clots of gumbies
- Spraylord bullshit


Children, on the other hand, are perfectly acceptable. Hell, it's unusual these days to see parents willing to spend quality time with their kids outdoors. Props to em. If you don't like it do what most folks do when I break out the lycra at the crag: find somewhere else to climb.
The first post worthy of my respect.

jakedatc wrote:
I've only seen set ups like that at the Meadows and where it was one kid in a playpen with one parent. I wouldn't think someone would haul all that shit up higher. I probably woulda been pissed too..

Would you have posted the same thing if the child that fell 5 feet was at Bonsai and took a 30 footer off the ledge and had been seriously injured or worse?

My wfr training taught me to look at mechanism of injury. A few more feet and the little bastard would have been sent to a trauma team. The parents have been blessed with dumb luck.

More to follow. I can't fight stupid in one post.


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 3:58 AM
Post #50 of 357 (6332 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

He is so going to beat your brittle ass at the father-son picnic. Hehehe.


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:01 AM
Post #51 of 357 (7030 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [shorty] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shorty wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions.

Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

It is unfortunate that we don't have a magic time machine which would allow us to:

1. see you during your pre-school years. I suspect you were a model of behavior.

2. see you with your future children during their pre-school years. I suspect they will be models of behavior.

3. see you during said recent climbs. I suspect you were a model of responsibility, who in no way would ever annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Granted, I may have been an irresponsible child as a child. Blame the ritalin.
Future children there will be none. Fuck off.
How about you during your recent climbs? Climbing is an arena of effort. Success and failure both hold lessons for those who are receptive.
I'm done with you.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:05 AM
Post #52 of 357 (7027 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
curt wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

Just wait till you have kids. I hope somebody reads this back to you. Cool

Curt

I've read this entire thread, and this post is the most glaring of the lot. The whole elitist "i'm better then you because i've procreated and your can't possibly understand what it's like to bring a child to adulthood mentality is a) disgusting, and b) sorely misguided.
No, I don't have kids...

Possibly you missed the Cool at the end of my post. I'm not saying that I'm better than you, but you are seriously mistaken if you think you can possibly understand what it is like to be a parent before you actually become one.

Curt


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:06 AM
Post #53 of 357 (7024 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [peg_leg1] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

peg_leg1 wrote:
You my friend are an idiot. God forbid that you ever reproduce. If you ever find someone shallow enough to mate with, what would you do if you had your kid, no babysitter, and really wanted to go climbing? I bet all of a sudden it would be OK, wouldn't it? Some childless friends might have bitched if I brought my kids to the crags, but now that they have kids it's cool.
Also, if you could focus enough to drown out the kids, maybe you would climb harder. If you have anymore bitching to do, go down to the Gunks and talk to the Family Climbing crowd.
BTW those kids that you bitch about are climbing 5.11's at 10 years old.
How fucking dare you.
a) reproduction is a responsibility which is often made light of. I will never make light of the weight which anothers life depends on my actions. Including bringing my kids to a place in which they clearly do not belong; aka the crag.
b)how does the top-roping chosspile that is the gunks have anything to do with this, other than as a playground for retards?


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:10 AM
Post #54 of 357 (7022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
So all of you are ok with inattentive parents letting 3 toddlers wander around a crag throwing rocks, crying and almost injuring themselves. that's cool.

A few months ago i was part of a group with a 3 yr old. Group of 4 adults one being the parent. She barely made a peep longer than 10 seconds the whole weekend. We all took turns taking care of her and making sure she was playing safely and not crying. When she did try to do something wrong she was told not to and why not.. she will learn much more than those kids screaming and throwing rocks with no intervention.

I think the point of the guy's post was the inattentive parents and the reckless and unsafe behavior of the kids. not that they were actually there.

You're as much a part of the problem as anyone.
My point is that there is a minimum responsibility level required for climbing, or even hanging out at the base of a popular climb. Shithead 3 year olds do not possess this responsibility.


Kartessa


Aug 4, 2009, 4:13 AM
Post #55 of 357 (7020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Geezus!

Obviously you never were a child, you were born out of a test-tube at the age of 21 and you didn't have parents who loved you and wanted to raise you with an appreciation for the outdoors.

Thank goodness you'll never spawn offspring, but some people do choose to have children. It is not your place to be chastising them for being actively involved in their children's lives, rather than leaving the kids on the couch, munching pringles and soda.


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:13 AM
Post #56 of 357 (7020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [chrisJoosse] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

chrisJoosse wrote:


Let me add another FU to the chorus.

I am just as interested in having a good time as you, and I am fervently committed to not being one of 'those &@#$%*parents', but if you can't get along when reasonably-regulated kids are around, that's your problem.

I'll add a fuck you to the chorus of those too emasculated to say so. i.e. you. Fuck off and rot.

The shitheads I referenced were not regulated, were not supervised, and were not safe.
Why did I not call the Department of Children and Families/ It ain't my business. Climbing is.


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 4:14 AM
Post #57 of 357 (7018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [knieveltech] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My respect for you has always been pretty good (wether you care or not, most people like to know though) but with these comments here you have kind of cemented the deal. I'm not going to say anything to the OP. He kind of strikes me as the guy that will father kids and then leave them because he feels they slow him down. To guys like that I've got nothing to say.

To you though... Much respect to you. Much respect. You said it. You said it right.

My kids have all been to the rock with me and I'm so proud of them for having the courage to do it. They made me very proud.


(This post was edited by rockreaver on Aug 4, 2009, 4:15 AM)


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:15 AM
Post #58 of 357 (7015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
I think a few of the righteous FUs and "you obviously don't have kids" dismissals are missing the point.

Kids, by definition, are spazzes. Cute, but they know not what they do. Even kids who are pretty good more often than not can be a handful. I can't blame them. The crag is a fun place to be, and they see the adults having fun, so why act like they're in church?

This is why they need adults to look after them, role model and reel them in if necessary. Children need to be controlled when they're at the crag, the gym, the grocery store, the movies, the county jail waiting area, whatever. If you can do that, great. If you can't, leave the kids at home. If you can't leave the kids at home and enjoy your activity, then you stay home too. Because life is just really unfair like that, you know?

I don't have children, but I don't mind them. I actually find them pretty enjoyable once they're old enough to have a conversation with you. It's just a courtesy thing. I've seen uncontrolled kids screaming and stampeding and throwing rocks at the crag and wanted to beat their PARENTS like a pinata (they were already hanging like one, so all I needed was a stick). I've also seen kids just chillin', digging in the dirt with their Hot Wheels and eating their fruit snacks away from the belay hang. And I felt no hostility whatsoever. I'd rather a whole field trip of quiet, respectful first-graders than one "I just got my lead card" douchebag and his screeching belay slave girlfriend having an epic on a warm-up.

That might be elitist, but it's hardly elitist to expect adults to be in control of their children at all times.

Wow.

A voice of reason.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:16 AM
Post #59 of 357 (7009 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
...Climbing is an arena of effort. Success and failure both hold lessons for those who are receptive...

Well, you don't climb very hard, so I suspect you know even less about that topic than you do about children.

Curt


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:19 AM
Post #60 of 357 (7002 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [Kartessa] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Kartessa wrote:
Wow... thats is some serious douche-baggery if I've ever seen any.

Why not bitch and moan to the parents instead of your virtual friends on the interwebs? Did you just follow them to get more and more reasons to fume all to yourself? Did you take notes so you could accurately report back to people who don't give a shit?

FU

Oh, so you wish to challenge my integrity? I did complain to the supervisors[/]. Nothing happened. Did I take notes?
I think all the notes that needed to be taken were done so while I was three bolts up: One of the older parasites took his 5' digger nose first. The parents wondered how something so tragic could befall them. I lowered, and they were gone before I could be of service.
FU. Scum.


Kartessa


Aug 4, 2009, 4:21 AM
Post #61 of 357 (6996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Its your fault for throwing the kid off...

Children can sense evil from great distances


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 4:22 AM
Post #62 of 357 (6995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
...but you are seriously mistaken if you think you can possibly understand what it is like to be a parent before you actually become one.

Curt
I'm not sure how many of the non-parents really purported to know what it's like to have kids. I don't. I think we're just thinking of common sense and courtesy. I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:26 AM
Post #63 of 357 (6987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
curt wrote:
...but you are seriously mistaken if you think you can possibly understand what it is like to be a parent before you actually become one.

Curt
I'm not sure how many of the non-parents really purported to know what it's like to have kids. I don't. I think we're just thinking of common sense and courtesy. I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I think it's all about being able to walk a mile in another man's shoes. Common sense and courtesy do not change, but one's priorities certainly can.

Curt


Kartessa


Aug 4, 2009, 4:27 AM
Post #64 of 357 (6981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I had one tantrum as a child... one... my mother saw to it that I showed nothing but model behaviour in public. Look, don't touch. Listen, don't speak.

Should I ever try to use her techniques on my son I would have Children's Aid banging down my door because somewhere in the last 20 years it's become illegal to spank, yell or do anything that may potentially harm their self esteem as adults.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 4:32 AM
Post #65 of 357 (6974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
The first post worthy of my respect.

Seems to have pretty low market value in this thread. I was going to offer to buy it from him for a penny, but then I realized I actually wanted the penny more.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:32 AM
Post #66 of 357 (6974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
He is so going to beat your brittle ass at the father-son picnic. Hehehe.

His pediatrician says he will be 6' 6" when he's fully grown, so I have definitely considered that possibility.

Curt


keithspernak


Aug 4, 2009, 4:39 AM
Post #67 of 357 (6965 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2007
Posts: 92

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

WORD!!!


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 4:42 AM
Post #68 of 357 (6960 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Redemption? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

You know I'm a parent and I'm a damned good one. I've been told it enough I feel I can quote that and spray a bit. My kids know how to have fun and rip up earth, turf, heaven and hell. However when I give them the "quiet" chat and pull out the bags of age appropriate distractions they shut it and get it done.

My wife and I share a view that kids who have a bag of age appropriate distractions (coloring, video games, pocket knives and whittling wood, etc...), food, snacks and parent instilled self-awareness can be taken anywhere and left largely unattended.

My kids have been to the crag admittedly our crags see 20 people a week instead of an hour. That doesn't mean I let my kids act like wild dogs even if I am there by myself. I let my kids hang it all out at the pool, the back yard and other spots like that but in the woods they respect the land and they respect my chance to enjoy it.

We take our kids everywhere and we talk with them about how they should act. We discuss in the car on the way over what behavior is okay and what behavior is not okay.

Now I do have 3 kids all young. If I packed them into your haunt and got them set up how would you feel? Understand that they would be spread out in a safe place on a blanket with chairs, plenty of food, distractions and a myriad of other things. They would know in advance to say "Hello", "Thank You" and "Let me get my parents for you."

If this situation would have caused you to walk on by and not even notice and not even make this post then I'll let you off the hook. Poorly managed kids ruin everyone's day and I have always believed that my rights end where yours begin and if you feel like you have the right to climb quietly, drop f-bombs and grope your partner that's fine. I'd rather you didn't but those are conversations I planned on having with my kids sooner or later and sooner is fine too. Know what I mean?

So let's aim for some redemption here. Would the situation I describe have sent you over to me and would you have said, "Your kids don't belong here it's not safe?" or would you have even noticed? Also understand that all of my kids even my 4 year old are pretty solid 5.7/5.8 climbers.

How would that situation sit with you? If you'd roll with the same response well then I guess you get what you get and that's how it goes. I don't condemn you or defend you. I'll just step around the body that has all the knives in it's back and tell my kids we'll talk about it later. Wink If however your response would be, "Whoa. That family kicks @$$. I didn't know people still had behaved kids." then sweet. Come on over and we'll pass the fruit snacks. Tongue

Take care man. Not all parents are bad people and not all kids make bad parents. In time life has it's own rhythm don't force it. Close your eyes, test the hold and when it feels right make your move. It's all good.

Whatever you do though be kind to kids. I really believe that the adults in a kids life have the biggest influence on whether or not that kid grows up to shoot someone and that someone might be you.Unsure Your behavior will certainly influence the people around you especially kids.

I'll never forget when my son said, "Damn dad that looks fun." he was 7 and I made a mental note to have a chat about that word and that I'd never say that in front of him again.

Belay is on.


(This post was edited by rockreaver on Aug 4, 2009, 4:45 AM)


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 4:43 AM
Post #69 of 357 (6954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [Kartessa] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Kartessa wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I had one tantrum as a child... one... my mother saw to it that I showed nothing but model behaviour in public. Look, don't touch. Listen, don't speak.

Should I ever try to use her techniques on my son I would have Children's Aid banging down my door because somewhere in the last 20 years it's become illegal to spank, yell or do anything that may potentially harm their self esteem as adults.
And see, that's probably why we get so many unleashed brats these days.

The kids who live next door to me are constantly screaming... SCREAMING... in the street, throwing pebbles at my dogs to make them bark, leaving their candy wrappers in my yard, zipping around my driveway even when the car is running. I know they're too little to know any better, but I never see their parents supervising. Somebody who works a few cubicles over from me regularly brings her kid to work. It is NEVER quiet. It screeches like a dolphin with an ear infection.

Children have always been stinkers but I don't remember so many kids being so awful when I was a kid 20 years ago (Curt, shut your mowf.)


keithspernak


Aug 4, 2009, 4:44 AM
Post #70 of 357 (6947 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2007
Posts: 92

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
1. What makes you think that you as a person are more entitled to being at any particular public place than another person who happens to be 5 years old?

2. You are entitled to be annoyed by certain things-- I have my own list, too. I suggest you anticipate these things and take steps to avoid them, instead of expecting other people to stay away in order for you to have a good day. How about going for a longer approach?

3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

4. You do not have kids, so you can't possibly understand the educational value to kids who are exposed to a variety of situations and see their parents enjoy various activities.

5. There are obnoxious children everywhere, and even the best kids can and do have bad days. The same is true for all adults. When dealing with abnoxious individuals of any age, your best bet is a polite mention to adults in charge. You would be surprized how effective this can be. However, if it doesn't work, go back to point 2.


6. Unless you are under 20yo, and still have some hope of growing up, I suggest that you take steps to make sure that not having kids is a permanent fact for you.

7. I am pretty sure my daughter will outclimb you by the time she is 8yo. She is 6yo now.

Who gives a shit about if someone climbs harder than someone else! Climbing is probably one of the most meaningless things out there.


(This post was edited by keithspernak on Aug 4, 2009, 4:47 AM)


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:49 AM
Post #71 of 357 (6936 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
Kartessa wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I had one tantrum as a child... one... my mother saw to it that I showed nothing but model behaviour in public. Look, don't touch. Listen, don't speak.

Should I ever try to use her techniques on my son I would have Children's Aid banging down my door because somewhere in the last 20 years it's become illegal to spank, yell or do anything that may potentially harm their self esteem as adults.
And see, that's probably why we get so many unleashed brats these days.

The kids who live next door to me are constantly screaming... SCREAMING... in the street, throwing pebbles at my dogs to make them bark, leaving their candy wrappers in my yard, zipping around my driveway even when the car is running. I know they're too little to know any better, but I never see their parents supervising. Somebody who works a few cubicles over from me regularly brings her kid to work. It is NEVER quiet. It screeches like a dolphin with an ear infection.

Children have always been stinkers but I don't remember so many kids being so awful when I was a kid 20 years ago (Curt, shut your mowf.)

I keep telling you to move out of the trailer park. Cool

Curt


climberguy2011


Aug 4, 2009, 4:50 AM
Post #72 of 357 (6932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [rockreaver] Redemption? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockreaver wrote:
You know I'm a parent and I'm a damned good one. I've been told it enough I feel I can quote that and spray a bit. My kids know how to have fun and rip up earth, turf, heaven and hell. However when I give them the "quiet" chat and pull out the bags of age appropriate distractions they shut it and get it done.
It appears to me that this is noting more than bread and circuses.
In reply to:
My wife and I share a view that kids who have a bag of age appropriate distractions (coloring, video games, pocket knives and whittling wood, etc...), food, snacks and parent instilled self-awareness can be taken anywhere and left largely unattended.

My kids have been to the crag admittedly our crags see 20 people a week instead of an hour. That doesn't mean I let my kids act like wild dogs even if I am there by myself. I let my kids hang it all out at the pool, the back yard and other spots like that but in the woods they respect the land and they respect my chance to enjoy it.
Would you like a cookie and a blowjob?

We take our kids everywhere and we talk with them about how they should act. We discuss in the car on the way over what behavior is okay and what behavior is not okay.

Now I do have 3 kids all young. If I packed them into your haunt and got them set up how would you feel? Understand that they would be spread out in a safe place on a blanket with chairs, plenty of food, distractions and a myriad of other things. They would know in advance to say "Hello", "Thank You" and "Let me get my parents for you."

If this situation would have caused you to walk on by and not even notice and not even make this post then I'll let you off the hook. Poorly managed kids ruin everyone's day and I have always believed that my rights end where yours begin and if you feel like you have the right to climb quietly, drop f-bombs and grope your partner that's fine. I'd rather you didn't but those are conversations I planned on having with my kids sooner or later and sooner is fine too. Know what I mean?

So let's aim for some redemption here. Would the situation I describe have sent you over to me and would you have said, "Your kids don't belong here it's not safe?" or would you have even noticed? Also understand that all of my kids even my 4 year old are pretty solid 5.7/5.8 climbers.

How would that situation sit with you? If you'd roll with the same response well then I guess you get what you get and that's how it goes. I don't condemn you or defend you. I'll just step around the body that has all the knives in it's back and tell my kids we'll talk about it later. Wink If however your response would be, "Whoa. That family kicks @$$. I didn't know people still had behaved kids." then sweet. Come on over and we'll pass the fruit snacks. Tongue

Take care man. Not all parents are bad people and not all kids make bad parents. In time life has it's own rhythm don't force it. Clothes your eyes, test the hold and when it feels right make your move. It's all good.

Whatever you do though be kind to kids. I really believe that the adults in a kids life have the biggest influence on whether or not that kid grows up to shoot someone and that someone might be you.Unsure Your behavior will certainly influence the people around you especially kids.

I'll never forget when my son said, "Damn dad that looks fun." he was 7 and I made a mental note to have a chat about that word and that I'd never say that in front of him again.

Belay is on.
I noticed the obscenity. It is less than life. As awesome as it is, the true levels are not that of the spinals.


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 4:52 AM
Post #73 of 357 (6930 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [keithspernak] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

keithspernak wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
1. What makes you think that you as a person are more entitled to being at any particular public place than another person who happens to be 5 years old?

2. You are entitled to be annoyed by certain things-- I have my own list, too. I suggest you anticipate these things and take steps to avoid them, instead of expecting other people to stay away in order for you to have a good day. How about going for a longer approach?

3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

4. You do not have kids, so you can't possibly understand the educational value to kids who are exposed to a variety of situations and see their parents enjoy various activities.

5. There are obnoxious children everywhere, and even the best kids can and do have bad days. The same is true for all adults. When dealing with abnoxious individuals of any age, your best bet is a polite mention to adults in charge. You would be surprized how effective this can be. However, if it doesn't work, go back to point 2.


6. Unless you are under 20yo, and still have some hope of growing up, I suggest that you take steps to make sure that not having kids is a permanent fact for you.

7. I am pretty sure my daughter will outclimb you by the time she is 8yo. She is 6yo now.

Who gives a shit about if someone climbs harder than someone else! Climbing is probably one of the most meaningless things out there.

That's what a whole bunch of weak climbers say. By the way, why do you post here?

Curt


climbsomething


Aug 4, 2009, 4:58 AM
Post #74 of 357 (6921 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
Kartessa wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I had one tantrum as a child... one... my mother saw to it that I showed nothing but model behaviour in public. Look, don't touch. Listen, don't speak.

Should I ever try to use her techniques on my son I would have Children's Aid banging down my door because somewhere in the last 20 years it's become illegal to spank, yell or do anything that may potentially harm their self esteem as adults.
And see, that's probably why we get so many unleashed brats these days.

The kids who live next door to me are constantly screaming... SCREAMING... in the street, throwing pebbles at my dogs to make them bark, leaving their candy wrappers in my yard, zipping around my driveway even when the car is running. I know they're too little to know any better, but I never see their parents supervising. Somebody who works a few cubicles over from me regularly brings her kid to work. It is NEVER quiet. It screeches like a dolphin with an ear infection.

Children have always been stinkers but I don't remember so many kids being so awful when I was a kid 20 years ago (Curt, shut your mowf.)

I keep telling you to move out of the trailer park. Cool

Curt
Manufactured home community. We gots stemwalls!


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 5:03 AM
Post #75 of 357 (6914 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [climbsomething] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbsomething wrote:
curt wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
Kartessa wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
I know my parents made sure I didn't get away with acting like a shrieking wind-up toy in public. And now, I only have a few crag tantrums Tongue

I had one tantrum as a child... one... my mother saw to it that I showed nothing but model behaviour in public. Look, don't touch. Listen, don't speak.

Should I ever try to use her techniques on my son I would have Children's Aid banging down my door because somewhere in the last 20 years it's become illegal to spank, yell or do anything that may potentially harm their self esteem as adults.
And see, that's probably why we get so many unleashed brats these days.

The kids who live next door to me are constantly screaming... SCREAMING... in the street, throwing pebbles at my dogs to make them bark, leaving their candy wrappers in my yard, zipping around my driveway even when the car is running. I know they're too little to know any better, but I never see their parents supervising. Somebody who works a few cubicles over from me regularly brings her kid to work. It is NEVER quiet. It screeches like a dolphin with an ear infection.

Children have always been stinkers but I don't remember so many kids being so awful when I was a kid 20 years ago (Curt, shut your mowf.)

I keep telling you to move out of the trailer park. Cool

Curt
Manufactured home community. We gots stemwalls!

Ah, my mistake then.

Curt


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 5:04 AM
Post #76 of 357 (6433 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [climberguy2011] Redemption? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bread and circuses? Sexual favors? Obscenities?

That explains why you are so down on kids. So that's what it was like for you growing up? Ouch. Man that's painful.

You should get some help.Tongue


jt512


Aug 4, 2009, 5:53 AM
Post #77 of 357 (6410 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location.

lena_chita wrote:
3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip

The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.

Five stars. You should break your silence more often.

Jay


chrisJoosse


Aug 4, 2009, 6:17 AM
Post #78 of 357 (6396 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 150

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
chrisJoosse wrote:


Let me add another FU to the chorus.

I am just as interested in having a good time as you, and I am fervently committed to not being one of 'those &@#$%*parents', but if you can't get along when reasonably-regulated kids are around, that's your problem.

I'll add a fuck you to the chorus of those too emasculated to say so. i.e. you. Fuck off and rot.

The shitheads I referenced were not regulated, were not supervised, and were not safe.
Why did I not call the Department of Children and Families/ It ain't my business. Climbing is.
Yet strangely you've made it your business- you didn't have to start this conversation, you know. The subject is obviously important to you.

I get your point, really I do. You want the crag to work, and unregulated kids render the situation very quickly unworkable. You may even want the crag to work for everyone, but your 'solution' (leave the kids at home) doesn't work for me. And your attitude almost, but doesn't quite incline me to organize a field trip of 4-year olds to come to your crag and sing a rousing chorus of Barney tunes until your liver explodes in a spray of apoplexy. Tongue

It sucks when people aren't responsible, but the solution to the problem is not to be an asshole about it. Ghandi once said "be the change you want to see in the world", and he was on to something- if it's important to you, (and it obviously is) you really have limited options: make a difference or be resentful about it. Your call.

Meanwhile, I'm bringing my boy to the crag. I do hope you can appreciate how that might be important to me. And if you can't... well, I can always start up with the kid's chorus. Sly


curt


Aug 4, 2009, 6:28 AM
Post #79 of 357 (6391 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [jt512] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
bigevilgrape wrote:
I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location.

lena_chita wrote:
3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip

The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.

Five stars. You should break your silence more often.

Jay

I'm not completely surprised that you would support the singularly selfish perspective here, but I am somewhat surprised that you don't have more empathy for those who have children.

Curt


bigevilgrape


Aug 4, 2009, 11:19 AM
Post #80 of 357 (6361 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [climboard] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

climboard wrote:
Did the toddlers throwing rocks all of three feet really scare you that much?

I don't know about him but any time kids are chucking around rocks it scares the piss out of me. Especially at rumney where there is often another crag directly below the one you are at.


robbovius


Aug 4, 2009, 11:19 AM
Post #81 of 357 (6362 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
subantz wrote:
...If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets...

It's "Tourette's"...you butt-plugging douche nozzle.

Curt

dude, he's from fucking Georgia, props to him that he can simply operate a PC and write, well... anything.


robbovius


Aug 4, 2009, 11:30 AM
Post #82 of 357 (6360 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.


austinnokc


Aug 4, 2009, 12:08 PM
Post #83 of 357 (6344 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2009
Posts: 23

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow, This thread has gone crazy. If this is possibly an attempted troll I believe it worked.

Mad Climbers Hierarchy
1. Broken Holds or Holds broken by people.
2. Being mean to little Children.
3. Rainy Days
4. Gear Failure
5. Unclean climbing practices.
6. Keep Adding Fellows

I have a little 15 mon old at the house and she loves climbing over momma and me. Can not wait until she can come climbing with me and my partners but that won't be for a while longer. I do look forward to sharing the outdoors and the vertical world with her.

Austin


lodi5onu


Aug 4, 2009, 12:33 PM
Post #84 of 357 (6331 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 335

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Come on! You still got the onsight of Couch Potato 5.9

haha, pussy


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 4, 2009, 1:11 PM
Post #85 of 357 (6306 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [lodi5onu] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

The "cookies and bj" comment to a post that was calm, polite and clear shows one of two thing:
1) The user is a troll. And a pretty good one. I mean "Leave Your Damn Dog at Home" has been done to death.

With the cookie/bj comment, the OP even throws his newly minted persona under the bus to further his cause.

Wonder who this alt goes with....

2) The user is a emotionally unstable. My bet is the reason the honking/fingers in traffic don't bother him is because he does it so often he's no longer aware he's speaking of himself with that comment.


jdefazio


Aug 4, 2009, 1:16 PM
Post #86 of 357 (6305 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 228

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
The planet is over-populated as it is, and furthering the status quo will accomplish nothing.

Yawn *tired argument is tired*


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 1:19 PM
Post #87 of 357 (6303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bitch all you want - it changes nothing. Our kids bother you more than they bother us. We are way worse than dog people.

DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Aug 4, 2009, 1:20 PM)


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 1:40 PM
Post #88 of 357 (6283 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
Bitch all you want - it changes nothing. Our kids bother you more than they bother us. We are way worse than dog people.

DMT

I prefer the kids.

I never see cats at the crags.


reg


Aug 4, 2009, 1:49 PM
Post #89 of 357 (6273 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
1. What makes you think that you as a person are more entitled to being at any particular public place than another person who happens to be 5 years old?

2. You are entitled to be annoyed by certain things-- I have my own list, too. I suggest you anticipate these things and take steps to avoid them, instead of expecting other people to stay away in order for you to have a good day. How about going for a longer approach?

3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

4. You do not have kids, so you can't possibly understand the educational value to kids who are exposed to a variety of situations and see their parents enjoy various activities.

5. There are obnoxious children everywhere, and even the best kids can and do have bad days. The same is true for all adults. When dealing with abnoxious individuals of any age, your best bet is a polite mention to adults in charge. You would be surprized how effective this can be. However, if it doesn't work, go back to point 2.


6. Unless you are under 20yo, and still have some hope of growing up, I suggest that you take steps to make sure that not having kids is a permanent fact for you.

7. I am pretty sure my daughter will outclimb you by the time she is 8yo. She is 6yo now.

climberguy - what she said!


wonderwoman


Aug 4, 2009, 1:54 PM
Post #90 of 357 (6266 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Here is where your problem begins:

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness.

Rumney is a zoo. If you want solitude, try some multi-pitch or areas that have longer approaches. Then I can write a rant complaining about you being there and ruining my day of climbing.


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 2:00 PM
Post #91 of 357 (6259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Bitch all you want - it changes nothing. Our kids bother you more than they bother us. We are way worse than dog people.

Nothing wrong with dog people or people people, only people who cannot control their dogs and people who think that they're more important because they chose to bang and creampie instead of wearing a raincoat or popping a pill. You chose to have children or are just lucky (or unlucky depending on your mentality) so in doing so you silently agreed that you were gonna give some things up. One of those things is frequent climbing trips and having time for yourself. It sucks but you need to wait until they are older and more mature so they can be safe while alone, can be educated and appreciate the environment, and not disturb everyone else. If you know the kids are really interested in climbing and not just using the base of the crag like a playground, then I say of course bring them. Its for the better of the community. When it ruins everyone else's good time because you chose to have a kid and are too impatient to wait for the right time to introduce them to climbing, then I say leave the kids at home.

Let me say that this is assuming you are trad or sport climbing. If you are bouldering I would say you can keep a good eye on younger ones while working some problems out. When bouldering, you can typically find other problems in the area and they are less likely to set up camp if they are moving constantly too.

Oh and there's the profanity thing again. If you want to bring your kids and you know they are little shits, then you are a prick and quit sharing your living example of bad parenting with everyone else. As a parent, you know if your child is a pain in public. I know this because I was a pain. If I wanted to be an asshole I could instill a new vocabulary in your child's mind. Then you could have a Denace the Menace with a sailor's mouth. If that doesn't work, I could always throw rocks back. Pfft haha


fresh


Aug 4, 2009, 2:02 PM
Post #92 of 357 (6257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

at least kids don't track mud all over your rope and whine when their parents start climbing, as all dogs do.

(yes, even your dog.)


AltitudeJunkie


Aug 4, 2009, 2:03 PM
Post #93 of 357 (6256 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2007
Posts: 94

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

AGREED!!!
when i have kids mine are going to get started out in a gym (flame on) so they can learn basic climbing etiquette. maybe thats not taught at all gyms but at the one i used to work at, it was. kids were just as well behaved as the adults for the most part. no running in the gym no running at the crag. no screaming or being loud and rowdy at the gym, no being loud and rowdy at the crag. i have seen some incredibly poorly behaved kids at the crag but also some incredibly well behaved kids (so i know its possible.) maybe my theory of starting them out in the gym is flawed, but before my kid sets foot on an approach trail, they will know better than to misbehave. maybe it will take longer than I think but im not going to be the parent at the crag that everyone else hates because i can't control my kid.


nickrp


Aug 4, 2009, 2:06 PM
Post #94 of 357 (6253 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 129

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness. While it was pretty hot and humid, it was a pretty good weekend for sending, and I ticked some good routes for me. It was a good weekend overall, except for one major issue.

Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

There is a back story to my anger. We were climbing at new wave, and as soon as we got to the area, another party with three children and a maximum age of 5 showed up. There were three adults in the group, and all the requisite equipment, including but not limited to: A tent, several toy trucks, three kid carriers, and all of the other crap that comes with hauling children into an environment which they clearly do not belong. They soon proved this by throwing rocks down the trail, running around and screaming, crying, and being a general nuisance.


The adult supervision treated their misbehavior with gentle scolding and no attempt to remedy the rock throwing or running around, as they were busy climbing. They did take the opportunity to scold me for swearing in frustration after falling on a route

Not only were they annoying, they potentially endangered their kids by bringing them to a hazardous place, and this was evident when one of the younger children lost his footing and tumbled, much like a pinball, about 5 feet down the trail, to the utter shock of the parents. He fortunately was uninjured.

Keep your fucking kids at home. The crag is not a safe place for children to run around, and not only do you put them in danger, you annoy the shit out of any other parties trying to have a good weekend. And then you bitch about my language when you brought them to an adult location.

Leave the little bastards at home until they can be responsible for their own actions. I don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma. Keep them at home until they are of a responsible age, and don't annoy the fuck out of your fellow climbers.

OK, first off I will agree with you, those kids sounded like a pain in the ass and probably should not have been there as they sounded like they were hazards to both themselves and others. But I will have to partially disagree with you, I think that kids are fine, if they meet ALL of the following criteria:
1. They climb, or are learning to climb, this does not mean running around in a harness! I mean really learning and focused.
2. Their parents understand what real discipline is. None of this new agey “I am disappointed in you…” or even worse “Jesus is disappointed with you.” Because honestly a 5 year old could not care less who is disappointed! They are 5! BUT they do understand a swat on the butt hurts and they don’t want another. (sorry, worked in a daycare in college in an upscale neighborhood, I have been jaded…)
3. They don’t scream, cry, or whine without there being some blood or perturbing bone to accompany it. There is nothing worse than when you are focused to have some whinny ass brat screaming about a splinter or stubbed toe. I know when kids get hurt they freak but GOOD parents teach their kid, or rather train their kid to not freak out over little things. ESPECIALLY Little girls, they are NOT princesses and they are no better than anyone else’s little girl. (Damn Disney has warped their brains!)
4. There are enough adults to have at least one adult per 2 kids at all times. None of this mommy is climbing, daddy is belaying, and little Johnny is running amuck. Bring a sitter, a friend, hell drag out a family member who doesn’t even climb! Just make sure there are adult eyes on your kid all the time! Rocks hurt!
5. They don’t need TOYS to entertain themselves outdoors. Parents need to teach their kids to appreciate the outdoors and teach them to entertain themselves when in the forest/desert/ ect. This does not mean throwing rocks, but maybe a little exploring or god forbid maybe a little firsthand education. They need to teach their kids to appreciate every moment because the way we are heading, there might not be any “outdoors” to take their kids to when they grow up.
OK before I hear all the flaming, especially about little girls and how I should not have kids. I don’t want any! So don’t worry. I helped my wife raise her little 10 year old sister practically as both parents worked crazy schedules and we were the baby sitters. And you know what, when she falls and begins to cry, and I am around… she knows no blood, no broken bones, NO Tears! And if she wants something done, she does it herself if she can. None of this Meggy, Meggy, tie my shoe or help me over this rock BS. And if she is misbehaving, it only takes one look…. Just one, and she stops. And NO I have never spanked her, she’s not my kid (even though it feels like it) but I sure as hell don’t tell her “I am disappointed” I tell her he gameboy is going to disappear or her TV is going to spend some time in my closet, and I mean it! And if that doesn’t work, yeah my wife will put her over the knee, just like I was!

All and all, I think well behaved kids are fine. Every kid should be exposed to the outdoors! Get their fat asses off the couch and away from the TV and Gameboys! But I will agree with ClimberGuy, those kids should not have been there, and those parents were bad parents for bringing them someplace dangerous. You should know what your kids can handle, and they sounded like typical little kids not interested in climbing. OK feel free to rip me a new one now…

EDIT: Holy Hell, I forgot about the swearing!! Sorry folks, if you take your kid out to a Public location, WILLINGLY in contact with large groups of adults, its your problem. I did not decide to pop out a kid, as well as did not decide to hang out with your kid. I decided to head out with other adults to have some adult fun. And if i let out an F-bomb for some reason, i really dont care if you kid is in earshot. If you are a good parent, you will teach you kid that swearing at their age is not OK. And YOU will lead by example, not me. Granted, I do watch my language when around my little sister, but that is because I have made the decision to hang out with a little kid and at that moment I am the example. And when/if something does slip out, she knows, she is 10, not 25! And a 10 year old does not talk like that. But sorry parents, when im out with my friends, year, we swear and we talk dirty (only with the guys) and we will even be respectful of others if they are in earshot. But im not going to watch my mouth every second as while doing adult activities, in a public place, with other adults, things slip out. And after being on best behavor in my cubical all week, im not looking to tip toe around YOUR children. Cool


(This post was edited by nickrp on Aug 4, 2009, 2:25 PM)


gmggg


Aug 4, 2009, 2:15 PM
Post #95 of 357 (6241 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I never see cats at the crags.

When I go bouldering at some of the local haunts I will often bring my Ferrets.

There are way too many people here going off on the troll, I know this isn't the best place for reasoned discussion or well thought out statements, but the hypocrisy is astounding.

How can you deride someone for being a jerk about not empathizing with the joys of bringing your kids into the "wilderness" while at the same time show a complete lack of empathy towards someone else's desire for a peaceful day climbing?

Many people have put forth the obvious connection between dogs and kids, but lets talk about some of the other potential crag distractions. i.e. How about a crag that sits on a property where it is legal to discharge firearms? If someone (a climber even) was at the base of the crag rat-a-tatting there favorite semi auto (responsibly even), how many people would be OK with that?

With that said, at Rumney you should expect four things: Kids, Gumbies, French Canadians, and Black Flies


gmggg


Aug 4, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #96 of 357 (6237 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [nickrp] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

nickrp wrote:
OK, first off I will agree with you, those kids sounded like a pain in the ass and probably should not have been there as they sounded like they were hazards to both themselves and others. But I will have to partially disagree with you, I think that kids are fine, if they meet ALL of the following criteria:
1. They climb, or are learning to climb, this does not mean running around in a harness! I mean really learning and focused.
2. Their parents understand what real discipline is. None of this new agey “I am disappointed in you…” or even worse “Jesus is disappointed with you.” Because honestly a 5 year old could not care less who is disappointed! They are 5! BUT they do understand a swat on the butt hurts and they don’t want another. (sorry, worked in a daycare in college in an upscale neighborhood, I have been jaded…)
3. They don’t scream, cry, or whine without there being some blood or perturbing bone to accompany it. There is nothing worse than when you are focused to have some whinny ass brat screaming about a splinter or stubbed toe. I know when kids get hurt they freak but GOOD parents teach their kid, or rather train their kid to not freak out over little things. ESPECIALLY Little girls, they are NOT princesses and they are no better than anyone else’s little girl. (Damn Disney has warped their brains!)
4. There are enough adults to have at least one adult per 2 kids at all times. None of this mommy is climbing, daddy is belaying, and little Johnny is running amuck. Bring a sitter, a friend, hell drag out a family member who doesn’t even climb! Just make sure there are adult eyes on your kid all the time! Rocks hurt!
5. They don’t need TOYS to entertain themselves outdoors. Parents need to teach their kids to appreciate the outdoors and teach them to entertain themselves when in the forest/desert/ ect. This does not mean throwing rocks, but maybe a little exploring or god forbid maybe a little firsthand education. They need to teach their kids to appreciate every moment because the way we are heading, there might not be any “outdoors” to take their kids to when they grow up.
OK before I hear all the flaming, especially about little girls and how I should not have kids. I don’t want any! So don’t worry. I helped my wife raise her little 10 year old sister practically as both parents worked crazy schedules and we were the baby sitters. And you know what, when she falls and begins to cry, and I am around… she knows no blood, no broken bones, NO Tears! And if she wants something done, she does it herself if she can. None of this Meggy, Meggy, tie my shoe or help me over this rock BS. And if she is misbehaving, it only takes one look…. Just one, and she stops. And NO I have never spanked her, she’s not my kid (even though it feels like it) but I sure as hell don’t tell her “I am disappointed” I tell her he gameboy is going to disappear or her TV is going to spend some time in my closet, and I mean it! And if that doesn’t work, yeah my wife will put her over the knee, just like I was!

All and all, I think well behaved kids are fine. Every kid should be exposed to the outdoors! Get their fat asses off the couch and away from the TV and Gameboys! But I will agree with ClimberGuy, those kids should not have been there, and those parents were bad parents for bringing them someplace dangerous. You should know what your kids can handle, and they sounded like typical little kids not interested in climbing. OK feel free to rip me a new one now…

+1

I think this was a successful troll, but this is still the right answer.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 4, 2009, 2:23 PM
Post #97 of 357 (6228 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location. .

I actually mostly agree with you there. The parents may not have made the best decision in bringing the kids to that particular location, and it also sounds like they weren't the best parents in terms of keeping track of the kids and keeping them appropriately entertained, safe and out of other people's way.

However, this is NOT an issue of the kids themselves. I can guarantee you that in the same place at the same crag a different group of kids/parents might have been entirely well behaved and corteous to others.

I took issue with OP voicing his blank opposition to kids at the crag just because they were kids, and mildly interfering with his enjoyment of the day, as if kids should be locked away somewhere where no one would see them until they are adults. Some adults they would grow up to be, that way!

bigevilgrape wrote:
Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip.

I agree that people should'nt have kids unless they have thought through the rumifications of that decision and are willing to accept the resonsibilities that come with that decision. Idon't agree with the rest. Children learn by doing. The best way to teach them to behave safely and appropriately in certain situations is to expose them to those situations and teach them how they are expected to behave. Certain situations have to be avoided for safety, but they are the minority. Obviously having 3 toddler-age kid coped up all day at a 10x10ft ledge with a 30ft drop on one side would be unrealistic...

Of course, in the OP it sounded like there wasn't much appropriate teaching going on. However, we only heard one side of the story, and I have a feeling it was a rather biased telling. Still, it is not KIDS' fault that they behave like kids do. It is the adult's fault, and the solution is not to keep the kids away, but to teach them to behave appropriately.

For what it's worth, in 4 years of going on trips, I have seen only ONE group of kids (two families, 3 kids total, ages 5-7 at the time) that behaved really disruptively and annoyed other people at the crag--and IMO it was clearly parents' fault.

I have seen one other family (3 kids, ages 4-8) where the parents were doing everything right, and the kids were still rather loud and disruptive to other people, though less so than the first case, b/c the parents were very vigilant. In this particular case I happen to know that the kids have certain ADHD and Aspergers issues.

Every other family with kids that I have come across while climbing has been no more disruptive to my climbing or to other people at the crag than any other group of same number individuals would have been.

I do believe that my children are pretty well-behaved at the crag, and I certainly work to make it that way, but I would let other people who have climbed with me when I had the kids along say anything about it. My daughter has been coming along with us since she was 2.5 years old. My son was 6.5yo at the time.

I would be the first one to tell any parent thinking of bringing their kids to the crag that it is a whole 'nother game when you bring the kids along, and you have to be prepared for it. You can't come with the mentality that you are going to send and crush while the kids stay out of your way. If you are the person primarily in charge of the kids, you come with the mentality that you are spending time with the kids, and doing a little bit of climbing as your parenting duties allow.

For now, I do my best (as in, my strongest) climbing without my kids. When I have the kids along, I get more kick out of watching my daughter boulder the starts of every route. It is a different kind of best.

bigevilgrape wrote:
The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.

Again, I agree with you that the parents have not made the best choices. But the solution is not to leave the kids at home, as the OP seems to think.

We don't know the full story. Maybe the parents in question are just starting out and learning what works for their families when they go climbing. Maybe they learned their lesson after this weekend and won't do it the same way again.

But in the end, I doubt they were more annoying than a group of gumbies who strew their gear all over the place where you can trip on it, walk blindly under a climber bouldering to the first bolt, step on other people's ropes, etc. etc.; or the dogs who run headlong into the belayers, nose through other people's lunches and snarl at you.


olderic


Aug 4, 2009, 2:29 PM
Post #98 of 357 (6214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Rumney is a zoo. If you want solitude, try some multi-pitch or areas that have longer approaches. Then I can write a rant complaining about you being there and ruining my day of climbing.

Bingo Tiff - if you hadn't said it I would have. I usually bring multiple kids AND a large dog when I go to Rumney. Of course several of my kids (yup to the OP - I have more kids then you can count - all the world's dwindling resources are going to be consumed by my family and the dog will will poop on what ever is left) would warm up on the OP's projects but the dog and I would still find them a challenge...


MikeSaint


Aug 4, 2009, 2:29 PM
Post #99 of 357 (6214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2007
Posts: 426

Sucker [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Whats up with Rumney? Never been in that neck of the woods. I guess I'm due for a bad day at the crag. Never had a problem with dogs, boomboxes and children.


markc


Aug 4, 2009, 2:32 PM
Post #100 of 357 (6211 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

As a parent, I'm torn between a real need to expose my child to the world around him and a desire to not negatively impact those around me in the process. I try to stack the deck in my favor as much as possible. That means bringing enough toys, food, and drink, bringing a blanket or other comfort items as necessary, etc. In some environments, it also means having a manageable adult to child ratio. I'm also prepared to make an exit if possible.

My kid has just as much right as anyone to be in public places, but that doesn't mean all locations are equal in terms of child-friendliness. It's important to prepare your children for the environment they're entering into as best as possible, but they aren't robots. They have their own perspective and reactions.

People have said, "Leave them at home until they're responsible." How do you think responsibility is instilled? In my experience, it's not by avoiding new situations. Kids aren't going to learn how to behave at the crag by sitting at home until some magical age of reason. Some crags are more kid-friendly than others. I have no issue with bringing my kid to a crag where there's a reasonable amount of space a the base, and low chance of rock fall. It sounds like these parents made a bad choice. (I've never been to Rumney, but it sounds a little awkward for that size of a group, and with that ratio of kids to adults.) That said, if any party is negatively impacting you, you also have the choice to move. I've done it myself more than once.

By the way, here's a picture of my kid's first time on rope. He insisted I wear my helmet, as well. What few people we ran into (climber or otherwise) were really friendly towards my son, and said it was really cool to see him all geared up. We were in a group with four adults, and no other kids. When he wasn't climbing, his new monster truck was a popular distraction. This was easily one of my better climbing days.




rockandlice


Aug 4, 2009, 2:34 PM
Post #101 of 357 (5000 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [MikeSaint] Sucker [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

MikeSaint wrote:
Whats up with Rumney? Never been in that neck of the woods. I guess I'm due for a bad day at the crag. Never had a problem with dogs, boomboxes and children.

You narrowly escaped the kid issue Saturday. There was a temper tantrum throwing screaming baby at Central Bubba that was by and far the worse disruption I've ever come across at a crag. Kid barreled on at the top of his lungs for a solid 40 minutes. At one point a normally calm guy (chris) commented "I wish I was good at punching babies". Shocked


robbovius


Aug 4, 2009, 2:38 PM
Post #102 of 357 (4997 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
Here is where your problem begins:

climberguy2011 wrote:
So, a few weekends ago, I was up at rumney for some sport goodness.

Rumney is a zoo. If you want solitude, try some multi-pitch or areas that have longer approaches. Then I can write a rant complaining about you being there and ruining my day of climbing.

no shit, last august when I was at Mt webster, I saw five people...totally ruined my communion with the slabs. fuckers, they were talking and everything.


(This post was edited by robbovius on Aug 4, 2009, 2:39 PM)


shorty


Aug 4, 2009, 2:40 PM
Post #103 of 357 (4995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 1266

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
How about you during your recent climbs? Climbing is an arena of effort. Success and failure both hold lessons for those who are receptive.

Thanks for asking. My most recent climb involved taking a new climber up his first multi-pitch climb -- a four-pitch 5.8 I put up a few years ago. He was totally jazzed being 350' off the deck. During the day I also mentored two climbers who stumbled on the area last year, but didn't have any route beta.

Earlier in the year I hosted a climbing day for the Access Fund staff. It was a combination of assessing my development to date and letting them have a "private" day on a large unpublished crag. The AF staff's climbing experience spanned a wide range -- it was a blast encouraging all through their individual cruxes and seeing their successes.

And when I'm not doing FA's, I often take climbers of moderate abilities on tours of our new routes, coaching them through the tougher sections should they desire any beta.


Partner camhead


Aug 4, 2009, 2:41 PM
Post #104 of 357 (4991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm not going to say much about the original topic. I've seen annoying kids at the crag, I've seen bad parents at the crag. I've also climbed with people who bring their kids to the crag (Lena is one of them), with no calamitous effects.


However, I don't want to talk about that. I want to profile/stereotype the douche nozzle who originally posted this.

Given that his username has "2011" in it (probably a graduation date), and that he sprays freshman-level pseudo intellect (overpopulation! I'll NEVER have kids! durrrrr), that he does not have a clear idea of basic genetics or reproduction ("I haven't allowed my chromosomes to join with an X chromosome," wft?), that he sprays on about taking a WFR class (Oh NOEZ! I skinned my knee! Good God get me a WFR!), here's my profile:

You're going to be a sophomore, probably started majoring in biology, switched your major to something like outdoor rec, you probably surround yourself with lesser climbers while boldly hangdogging the bolted 11a's, similarly, you sate your ego by aspiring to some sort of "guiding" job, and You probably have around a B-/C+ GPA. And whether I am right or not, you are going to tell me that you are really smart, and that you climb way better than your profile says.

that was fun.


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 2:43 PM
Post #105 of 357 (4988 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rahhr britch rahr, Thats funny dingus. Yes I am a uneducated mudder truckjer that cant contriol my frucken mouth at times but this is all in fun. Arswhole. Blush


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 2:48 PM
Post #106 of 357 (4980 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [camhead] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
You're going to be a sophomore, probably started majoring in biology, switched your major to something like outdoor rec, you probably surround yourself with lesser climbers while boldly hangdogging the bolted 11a's, similarly, you sate your ego by aspiring to some sort of "guiding" job, and You probably have around a B-/C+ GPA. And whether I am right or not, you are going to tell me that you are really smart, and that you climb way better than your profile says.

This is the most in depth stereotyping I've ever seen. Context clues will get you far.


nickrp


Aug 4, 2009, 2:57 PM
Post #107 of 357 (4970 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 129

Re: [camhead] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
I'm not going to say much about the original topic. I've seen annoying kids at the crag, I've seen bad parents at the crag. I've also climbed with people who bring their kids to the crag (Lena is one of them), with no calamitous effects.


However, I don't want to talk about that. I want to profile/stereotype the douche nozzle who originally posted this.

Given that his username has "2011" in it (probably a graduation date), and that he sprays freshman-level pseudo intellect (overpopulation! I'll NEVER have kids! durrrrr), that he does not have a clear idea of basic genetics or reproduction ("I haven't allowed my chromosomes to join with an X chromosome," wft?), that he sprays on about taking a WFR class (Oh NOEZ! I skinned my knee! Good God get me a WFR!), here's my profile:

You're going to be a sophomore, probably started majoring in biology, switched your major to something like outdoor rec, you probably surround yourself with lesser climbers while boldly hangdogging the bolted 11a's, similarly, you sate your ego by aspiring to some sort of "guiding" job, and You probably have around a B-/C+ GPA. And whether I am right or not, you are going to tell me that you are really smart, and that you climb way better than your profile says.

that was fun.

I will admit, that is pretty entertaining. But hey he may be an adult that just does not want kids, there are some of us out there.


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 2:58 PM
Post #108 of 357 (4967 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey p-nas go back to picking your nose. I love Georgia. Your just mad cause we have bulletproof sandstone and granite. All within 2 hours away. OK finished with you now. Go change your diaper


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 3:00 PM
Post #109 of 357 (4966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [markc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
People have said, "Leave them at home until they're responsible." How do you think responsibility is instilled?

Through good parenting.

DMT


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 3:02 PM
Post #110 of 357 (4966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [markc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Umm... that was so incredibly... *COOL*!

Great post. Really great. My kids have all been up a 60' pitch grade 5.8 even my 4 year old and she actually rocked the crag like a vetted vet. Of course 3 months at a gym with 40' walls helped and lots of patience. It took her 2 months to break the bouldering line but after that she never looked back and she's got a freakishly good rap form that blows my mind.

I think of all my kids my 4 year old will be the one dragging me to yose when I'm 40+ and making me belay her up the stuff I dream of. Sure I'll be the sloppy 2nd, the pig, the sherpa but I cannot wait.

Your point I liked most about, "How do you think responsibility is instilled is brilliant." all of my kids are guaranteed at least 2 full pitches at grade 5.7 if I can find it or 5.8 if I cannot and hell or high water if they want it they get it. My son ties in my two girls, he's the safety guy on the ground and he does a great job. He has caught me on a few minor things and I've been very impressed. A hot fire burns in his eyes and I can tell he can feel a lead just waiting to bust out.

I think your photo is the 1000 words that shows how it can be done right.

I've had people stop, talk to my kids. This one guy checked each of their harnesses and talked climbing with each of them. This guy was thoughtful and intelligent for a 20 something. He gave each of them a biner of their own and he was careful to give them lockers that were all the same. Each of them carries it on their harness no matter where they are.

That dude did it with style and really proxied my kids into climbing with open arms. It was a cool day. If I was a softie like Dingus I would have cried. Tongue

It was cool. When my kids are out they know that most importantly we "Leave no trace." we "Leave it as we found it." and we have fun.

Loved your comments though. They were great.Cool The photo was too cool. Great stuff!


angeleyes


Aug 4, 2009, 3:08 PM
Post #111 of 357 (4954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 26, 2009
Posts: 58

Re: [ACJ] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ACJ wrote:
I think your going a little over the top, there are bound to be some responsible adults out there.

Anyway, this is what I experienced today...

A sketchy summer camp full of crappy staff leading trips to the local crag. Then I looked on in horror as the staff teach the kids how to carve their names into the rock and knock over widow maker trees while they wait for their turn to "race" up the 4th class terrain that they put on top rope.

Now somebody needs to revoke their commercial permit to climb in the national forests...

report them? I'd think at the least the name carving would cause them to at least warn the people.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 3:27 PM
Post #112 of 357 (4932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Crying is good for me.

DMT


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 3:30 PM
Post #113 of 357 (4926 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobbj22 wrote:
You chose to have children or are just lucky (or unlucky depending on your mentality) so in doing so you silently agreed that you were gonna give some things up.

Nope, never did.

Maybe you're forcing your opinions on child rearing on other people.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 3:33 PM
Post #114 of 357 (4922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
Bitch all you want - it changes nothing. Our kids bother you more than they bother us. We are way worse than dog people.

DMT

You implying there's something wrong with dog-people?



nickrp


Aug 4, 2009, 3:36 PM
Post #115 of 357 (4917 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 129

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockreaver wrote:
Umm... that was so incredibly... *COOL*!

Great post. Really great. My kids have all been up a 60' pitch grade 5.8 even my 4 year old and she actually rocked the crag like a vetted vet. Of course 3 months at a gym with 40' walls helped and lots of patience. It took her 2 months to break the bouldering line but after that she never looked back and she's got a freakishly good rap form that blows my mind.

I think of all my kids my 4 year old will be the one dragging me to yose when I'm 40+ and making me belay her up the stuff I dream of. Sure I'll be the sloppy 2nd, the pig, the sherpa but I cannot wait.

Your point I liked most about, "How do you think responsibility is instilled is brilliant." all of my kids are guaranteed at least 2 full pitches at grade 5.7 if I can find it or 5.8 if I cannot and hell or high water if they want it they get it. My son ties in my two girls, he's the safety guy on the ground and he does a great job. He has caught me on a few minor things and I've been very impressed. A hot fire burns in his eyes and I can tell he can feel a lead just waiting to bust out.

I think your photo is the 1000 words that shows how it can be done right.

I've had people stop, talk to my kids. This one guy checked each of their harnesses and talked climbing with each of them. This guy was thoughtful and intelligent for a 20 something. He gave each of them a biner of their own and he was careful to give them lockers that were all the same. Each of them carries it on their harness no matter where they are.

That dude did it with style and really proxied my kids into climbing with open arms. It was a cool day. If I was a softie like Dingus I would have cried. Tongue

It was cool. When my kids are out they know that most importantly we "Leave no trace." we "Leave it as we found it." and we have fun.

Loved your comments though. They were great.Cool The photo was too cool. Great stuff!

See, now it sounds like you have trained/raised your kids properly. Unlike the origional posters experience, encountering your family at the rocks seems like it would be inspiring rather than annoying. It sounds like your kids are into it, well behaved and respectful of their surroundings and not screaming and running around like chickens with their heads cut off.


atg200


Aug 4, 2009, 3:45 PM
Post #116 of 357 (4895 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2001
Posts: 4317

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

Really? So people who have gone through a series of worsening miscarriages and ultimately found out kids are not going to happen are failures? Nice.


reno


Aug 4, 2009, 4:03 PM
Post #117 of 357 (4874 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

Not buying it, dude.

Not everyone is able to have children, for various reasons... physical ailments, for example. Others elect to find fulfillment of life by other means. Doesn't mean they're living in a state of arrested adolescence or that they've failed as humans.


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 4:13 PM
Post #118 of 357 (4871 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [nickrp] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

nickrp wrote:
See, now it sounds like you have trained/raised your kids properly. Unlike the origional posters experience, encountering your family at the rocks seems like it would be inspiring rather than annoying. It sounds like your kids are into it, well behaved and respectful of their surroundings and not screaming and running around like chickens with their heads cut off.

You know each of my kids has had to be inspired to do well in life. Sometimes a swat gives them the courage to do the right thing next time. Sometimes with my 8 year old son I tell him, "I won't be there and I cannot judge the choices you make. I have to trust you but here's what you can expect from {this} so choose well." Sometimes I stand guard and am the wall they use at their backs. I don't push, I don't bend. I'm just there. Other times I have to hoot and holler like a cheerleader to get them to try the roof and mantel it over the top.

Parenting becomes offensive when your kids motivate someone to make a post like the OP made. I think he could have been more lenient but the grain of truth is there in his words. Had he chosen a different stance. Had he worded his anger more thoughtfully there would have been a lot of people piling on and saying, "Yeah that's hard. I've seen 5 year old's doing it and I've seen 23 year old's just as bad." Really we've all been there. I cannot stand screaming or loud kids in restaurants, movie theaters and such. I work too hard for my weeknights, weekends and evenings to give up a precious outing for someone else to crash it with a "selfish fest". I get really angry at people who say, "If you don't like it too bad I'm going to {climb} or whatever."

Yeah it's a lot of work. Yes I waited forever to be able to take them into public. Yes I said no to a lot of things. My wife and I had to learn to have our own lives and we had to learn that time together had a price. We got babysitters or we picked activities appropriate for where our family was. I cannot tell you the nights I've stood in the back and been the jungle gym my kids climbed on in sheer boredom and I was ready to exit the moment they made even the slightest sound. I've missed 1/2 or more of movies, plays, meals. I don't regret any of it. Parenting isn't easy. It's a choice and you make it.

Just like climbing in many ways. We've all been stuck on a climb above our ability. Stacking fingers and they pull (with less skin than before), cranking on a flake and your fit slips... well your skin on your shin will grow back right? Raising kids is just as hard. Takes work.

I don't begrudge this guys right to climb in a reasonable setting. I don't at all because I know how much effort I put into my kids behavior and I get angry when other parents don't work just as hard. I just think that what you say isn't nearly as important as *how* you say it. This guy did it all wrong. So he's either going to be part of "Future homewreckers of America" and he'll bail on each kid he fathers or he'll stand fast, hold the brake no matter what and anchor his family for years to come. That's his choice and maybe he has some things to think about now.

I just cannot help but wonder if he was the same kid he expected those kids to be or if he's just some selfish jerk that orders a meal for each side of his face. I have no idea and I don't want one. If I saw him at the crag I'd walk. He would certainly climb alone in my book. That's fine with him but a life alone can be lonely and he needs to figure out some lessons.

That's why message boards are brilliant places to learn about life. I'm sure he made that post and expected everyone to praise him for sharing their view exactly. Had he worded it differently they just might have. So hopefully he'll reconsider and take more away from this than insults.

It's his life though. If he wants to be angry for most of it then he's the loser. I'm okay with that. Sure I work my butt off. Sure I swat my kids. Sure I make them behave. It's a ton of work and now it's really paying off.

I have 3 sherpa's coming up in the ranks. Laugh


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 4:18 PM
Post #119 of 357 (4858 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
robbovius wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

Not buying it, dude.

Not everyone is able to have children, for various reasons... physical ailments, for example. Others elect to find fulfillment of life by other means. Doesn't mean they're living in a state of arrested adolescence or that they've failed as humans.

I thought it was sarcasm.


reno


Aug 4, 2009, 4:31 PM
Post #120 of 357 (4844 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
reno wrote:
robbovius wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

Not buying it, dude.

Not everyone is able to have children, for various reasons... physical ailments, for example. Others elect to find fulfillment of life by other means. Doesn't mean they're living in a state of arrested adolescence or that they've failed as humans.

I thought it was sarcasm.

If it was, then I apologize if I offended, but I stand by my statement.


Partner camhead


Aug 4, 2009, 4:43 PM
Post #121 of 357 (4832 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
kriso9tails wrote:
reno wrote:
robbovius wrote:
climberguy2011 wrote:
Future children there will be none. Fuck off..

then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

Not buying it, dude.

Not everyone is able to have children, for various reasons... physical ailments, for example. Others elect to find fulfillment of life by other means. Doesn't mean they're living in a state of arrested adolescence or that they've failed as humans.

I thought it was sarcasm.

If it was, then I apologize if I offended, but I stand by my statement.

Don't think it is sarcasm. Rob has gone off on the whole "if you don't have kids you're a selfish terrible person" thing more than once.


nickrp


Aug 4, 2009, 4:50 PM
Post #122 of 357 (4827 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 129

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockreaver wrote:
I don't begrudge this guys right to climb in a reasonable setting. I don't at all because I know how much effort I put into my kids behavior and I get angry when other parents don't work just as hard. I just think that what you say isn't nearly as important as *how* you say it. This guy did it all wrong. So he's either going to be part of "Future homewreckers of America" and he'll bail on each kid he fathers or he'll stand fast, hold the brake no matter what and anchor his family for years to come. That's his choice and maybe he has some things to think about now.

I just cannot help but wonder if he was the same kid he expected those kids to be or if he's just some selfish jerk that orders a meal for each side of his face. I have no idea and I don't want one. If I saw him at the crag I'd walk. He would certainly climb alone in my book. That's fine with him but a life alone can be lonely and he needs to figure out some lessons.

That's why message boards are brilliant places to learn about life. I'm sure he made that post and expected everyone to praise him for sharing their view exactly. Had he worded it differently they just might have. So hopefully he'll reconsider and take more away from this than insults.

It's his life though. If he wants to be angry for most of it then he's the loser. I'm okay with that. Sure I work my butt off. Sure I swat my kids. Sure I make them behave. It's a ton of work and now it's really paying off.

I have 3 sherpa's coming up in the ranks. Laugh

Are you refering to me, or the origional poster? If you were referring to me, first I do not expect anyone to agree with me, because the whole no desire to have children is not the most popular among other adults and second, yeah I will admit, I was a punk little kid…at home. But my parents one, knew what I could handle, they knew I was loud and well rambunctious. As such they tried to avoid “adult environments” when they could if they knew it would be too much for me. BUT if we were in an “Adult setting” I knew when to behave, because I did get those “swats of encouragement” and I am thankful for em…. Well now I am at least. And as for being a future homewrecker of America…umm no?? If I for some reason accidentally got my wife pregnant (knocking on wood as I type) I would be there through thick and thin. Granted it is defiantly not the path my wife or I want to go down in our lives we do understand that, accidents happen. And I feel that we would do just fine raising a child, we would love and care for him/her and do our best to mold them into a responsible, intelligent and respectful person.

Just curious who you were directing your comments to?


durangoclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 4:55 PM
Post #123 of 357 (4820 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Posts: 179

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

The FU is hardly enough. What a jackass. My kids started when they were two (yes two). They have grown into incredible kids, climbers, and friends to even some adults. They are very well behaved. Your elitist attitude sucks. Hope you climb here in Durango someday so my little 12 y/o bad ass can climb circles around your punk ass.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 4:57 PM
Post #124 of 357 (4817 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [camhead] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Don't think it is sarcasm. Rob has gone off on the whole "if you don't have kids you're a selfish terrible person" thing more than once.

Oh. Well, in that case it might be mental illness.


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 5:03 PM
Post #125 of 357 (4805 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [nickrp] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh gosh not you at all. No! Oops. Not you.

I think my comments (not to you at all) were just kind of "in the future" like what will this guy turn out to be like? I think he's going buy climberguy2011 or some such. I was just wondering what type of person he really is.

He just came off here as a really emo, angry person. When he does have kids (I actually hope he does. I hope he does by choice not accident.) he's going to learn how much work it takes to harness all that energy that is a child. Children are not awful but they sure do get a bad rap from people who don't raise theirs with love, compassion, etc...

When people go somewhere (like a crag) and let their kids go insane when other people are around it really makes them look bad or it should. Ironically people go off about the kids. In this case the parents were really the issue. They really were. But gosh even that's subjective. I didn't witness any of it. These kids may not have been that bad at all I have no idea. This guy feels they were though so I might be making a bigger mistake to take his word (I probably am.) for truth.

Anyway, someday this guy might get to try his hand at it. It's not the kids fault. They are really just wanting someone to notice them and take the time to get on their level. When you pay attention to kids the silence tells the tale. When you don't the chaos is hard to ignore unless... Well so anyway.

I just hope this guy does it better when/if it becomes his turn. Parenting is hard. Really hard. But it's fun too. I'm not one of those that thinks it makes you a better person and your a lesser person for not having kids. I don't buy into that. If you need "things" in your life to "make" you a better person then you've got big problems. Life's experiences should by nature make you better and whether you raise kids or don't really doesn't matter at all.

Wow I have rambled. I guess I'm responding to a few thoughts expressed.

To you though... no. Your words to me were kind and I appreciate them a lot. My reply was to you but not about you in the least. I can tell your living your life with a full rack and you have a pretty good idea about how to use it and when. That came right through. So I appreciated your comments a lot. Mine were to you but about the OP.

Hopefully that's more clear now. I meander a lot (I think I write a lot like I climb) and wander around when I'm writing.CrazyLaugh


nickrp


Aug 4, 2009, 5:27 PM
Post #126 of 357 (6387 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 129

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockreaver wrote:
Oh gosh not you at all. No! Oops. Not you.

I think my comments (not to you at all) were just kind of "in the future" like what will this guy turn out to be like? I think he's going buy climberguy2011 or some such. I was just wondering what type of person he really is.

He just came off here as a really emo, angry person. When he does have kids (I actually hope he does. I hope he does by choice not accident.) he's going to learn how much work it takes to harness all that energy that is a child. Children are not awful but they sure do get a bad rap from people who don't raise theirs with love, compassion, etc...

When people go somewhere (like a crag) and let their kids go insane when other people are around it really makes them look bad or it should. Ironically people go off about the kids. In this case the parents were really the issue. They really were. But gosh even that's subjective. I didn't witness any of it. These kids may not have been that bad at all I have no idea. This guy feels they were though so I might be making a bigger mistake to take his word (I probably am.) for truth.

Anyway, someday this guy might get to try his hand at it. It's not the kids fault. They are really just wanting someone to notice them and take the time to get on their level. When you pay attention to kids the silence tells the tale. When you don't the chaos is hard to ignore unless... Well so anyway.

I just hope this guy does it better when/if it becomes his turn. Parenting is hard. Really hard. But it's fun too. I'm not one of those that thinks it makes you a better person and your a lesser person for not having kids. I don't buy into that. If you need "things" in your life to "make" you a better person then you've got big problems. Life's experiences should by nature make you better and whether you raise kids or don't really doesn't matter at all.

Wow I have rambled. I guess I'm responding to a few thoughts expressed.

To you though... no. Your words to me were kind and I appreciate them a lot. My reply was to you but not about you in the least. I can tell your living your life with a full rack and you have a pretty good idea about how to use it and when. That came right through. So I appreciated your comments a lot. Mine were to you but about the OP.

Hopefully that's more clear now. I meander a lot (I think I write a lot like I climb) and wander around when I'm writing.CrazyLaugh

Hey no problem. I do fully agree with you that raising kids is A LOT of work. I don’t know if you saw my previous post, but I worked in a daycare through college and helped raise my wife’s little sister (from the age of 1) and I know firsthand how much work goes into shaping a child into a great little person. And I will admit, it’s purely selfish reasons why my wife and I have chosen not to have kids, we both feel like we already have one, and we love the little monster, but we still don’t want our own.

I also agree that he should not be mad at the kids for how they act, it is the parents job to reign them in at that age. But as far as the parent talking to him about the swearing, well honestly one, probably heard worse on the local prime time TV, and two I would be more concerned as to my kids action then for their precious ears. But once again, both those issues are the parents fault not the kids.

An I am glad you have your kids out there, it sounds like you brought them up right and I think it’s great that there are parents that one will spend time with their kids like my dad did, and that there are still some kids out there that know what discipline is.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 4, 2009, 5:35 PM
Post #127 of 357 (6375 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [camhead] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
I'm not going to say much about the original topic. I've seen annoying kids at the crag, I've seen bad parents at the crag. I've also climbed with people who bring their kids to the crag (Lena is one of them), with no calamitous effects..

NO calamitous effects -- you are a diplomat! I thought that weekend was actually the worst that they've been in a long time. I was exhausted by the end of it. And you hadthe car ride to enjoy, as well as the day at the crag... Believe it or not, we made exactly two bathroom stops on the 8-hour drive with the kids... a normal situation. And how many did we have last weekend between C-bus and RRG? I certainly lost count of that. I think it was the last camping trip with the kids this year for me. Since the school is starting in couple weeks, I would probably confine the kid climbing weekends to the local day trips.



camhead wrote:
Given that his username has "2011" in it (probably a graduation date), and that he sprays freshman-level pseudo intellect (overpopulation! I'll NEVER have kids! durrrrr), that he does not have a clear idea of basic genetics or reproduction ("I haven't allowed my chromosomes to join with an X chromosome," wft?), that he sprays on about taking a WFR class (Oh NOEZ! I skinned my knee! Good God get me a WFR!), here's my profile:

You're going to be a sophomore, probably started majoring in biology, switched your major to something like outdoor rec, you probably surround yourself with lesser climbers while boldly hangdogging the bolted 11a's, similarly, you sate your ego by aspiring to some sort of "guiding" job, and You probably have around a B-/C+ GPA. And whether I am right or not, you are going to tell me that you are really smart, and that you climb way better than your profile says.

that was fun.

Good profiling!


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 5:39 PM
Post #128 of 357 (6367 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [nickrp] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Parenting rescued me from a life of traveling at will, having plenty of money whenever I wanted something and generally getting-life-on however I chose. Boy I'm so glad they pulled me out of a life like that. Sounds so awful. Crazy

There's some truth to that... truly. But in return I have a ton of fun packed into 3 human beings sometimes I call them "human bings" bing-bing-bing (yeah lame). I have 3 sherpas. Think of all the boyfriend stories I'll get to hear. Think of the heavy metal CDs I can steal from my son. It's going to be great.

I'll retire poor and raise rich kids to take care of me. Isn't that the real American Dream? Oh damn... wait that's uh going straight up El Caps Nose. (Gosh that sounds awfully strange.)

No seriously! Thanks for the compliments. Good on you for standing in the gap when the 1 year old needed it most. That's awesome.

As far as swearing and whatever. OMG! My kids probably know more swear words than I do. I see all the OMXGYCNFDW stuff here and I have to ask them what it means. Cool

Anyway, some people here got really angry, some people didn't. I cannot help but think we all learned something though. This is one of those posts that is a major groan but maybe a bit of wisdom can be salvaged here and there...Angelic


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 5:50 PM
Post #129 of 357 (6354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I totally agree. As a single mom of a 3 1/2 year old, I would not dream of taking my child on a climbing trip. To the gym? Yes. On a camping trip? Yes. Hiking? Yup.
I would not take her on a climbing trip (yet) because its not the place for a toddler, for numerous reasons:
1. I can't keep an eye on her and concentrate on climbing/belaying...both of those things would need my undivided attention.
2. What if something happens to me or my partner and one of us is injured?
3. Snakes, poison ivy, crag dogs, edges of cliffs...etc
4. What if she starts harassing other climbers who are trying to belay or climb?
Honestly, the whole thing sounds like a mess to me. But when she is older and I do take her, you damn well better believe she will not be running around, screaming and acting all crazy like.


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 6:10 PM
Post #130 of 357 (6293 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just out of curiosity, do you have an age in mind?


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 6:19 PM
Post #131 of 357 (6279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't have an age in mind. I'm thinking six or seven...but I'll be watching her for the maturity that would be necessary for a climbing trip. Every child is different...some are ready sooner, some later. I will probably be asking my doctor also...I'm thinking in terms of, if the worst happens (she gets bitten by a copperhead and there is a 30 minute hike out...) will she be able to tolerate it like an adult. Could she get hurt/bitten by a snake, etc, playing outside? Well, yes, but its far more unlikely and the hospital is a couple minutes ride in the car down the road. To me, its using common sense as a parent. That said, I don't judge...other people are in different situations and their children are different. To me, parenting comes first, because it was a decision of responsibility that I made. Climbing has to come second...that doesn't mean I don't want to expose my daughter to climbing...which is why I take her to the gym. I might take her to a place like the Columns in Eugene Oregon (drive up crag, zero approach, easy access to hospital), but other than that, no. My own thoughts as a parent.


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 6:24 PM
Post #132 of 357 (6265 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
You chose to have children or are just lucky (or unlucky depending on your mentality) so in doing so you silently agreed that you were gonna give some things up.

Nope, never did.

Maybe you're forcing your opinions on child rearing on other people.

Maybe your a selfish prick for choosing to pursue the all the freedoms you enjoyed when you didn't have children. That's so unfair to your kids. You have to give things up for them; they're yours afterall. Your priorities are fucked up and you need to figure them out. The kids come first, not you.


budman


Aug 4, 2009, 6:33 PM
Post #133 of 357 (6256 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 170

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wish my Mom had taken me climbing when I was 3 1/2. That's why I took my kids when they were very young. If you take you children climbing, then climb with them. If you are there to climb then leave them home, unless there is adult supervision. For those not very tolerant of children, act like an adult and pick somewhere else to climb. Give the kids their day, there will be another day for your project. As to the language thing, if you can't see why it's wrong and can't respect that then you probably have no respect for your self as well. Oh yeh, taking your kids outside to climb is one of the best things for you and them.


majid_sabet


Aug 4, 2009, 6:42 PM
Post #134 of 357 (6251 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [budman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

several weeks ago while hiking on a popular trail, I ran in to a completely naked 3-4 years old boy playing behind the rock with no parents in sight.

So I yell to nearest person in the trial if they know who this kid was belonging to and she said oh yaa, his parents are over there. Then i said; call them up and let come and get this kid or or I will be taking him down.

A minute later,some ignorant lady comes and says, yes that is my boy and what seems to be the problem ?

i reply nothing seems to be a problem but kids do disappear which make s a CF of hell for others to find your kid then she goes come on boy and kids run toward the trail. then she tells her husband; hey jeff, can you watch the boy while boy is running toward class 2 river.

WTF

So I ran in to guy and told him that river kills people in 1 minute so you may want to stop your kid from getting near it and the guy was so fucking relax like he did not give a sh*t if his kid died.

well, if that is you up there then do not bring your kid cause you will piss off people.


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 7:05 PM
Post #135 of 357 (6235 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [budman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

YOU wish YOUR mom had taken you. I'm not saying your kids don't like it or don't want to go...but taking them because that was your wish is the wrong motive. I wish my mom had taken me also...and camping and hiking and biking and all of that other stuff I love. But, for example, my daughter is afraid of heights (LMAO every climbing parents worst nightmare, eh?) so I go with it. She loves going biking with me though, so I take her. I agree with the rest of your post though.


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 7:08 PM
Post #136 of 357 (6229 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bobbj22 wrote:
In reply to:
In reply to:
You chose to have children or are just lucky (or unlucky depending on your mentality) so in doing so you silently agreed that you were gonna give some things up.

Nope, never did.

Maybe you're forcing your opinions on child rearing on other people.

Maybe your a selfish prick for choosing to pursue the all the freedoms you enjoyed when you didn't have children. That's so unfair to your kids. You have to give things up for them; they're yours afterall. Your priorities are fucked up and you need to figure them out. The kids come first, not you.

There you go again, putting your opinions of things onto other people.

So I should stay home and take care of my kids. And not have a job? What shall I feed them with? What shall I do when I'm so stressed out by doing nothing but taking care of them that I want to kill them? Do I go to work? Well, how often? Oh please tell me oh fountain of wisdom.

I have four kids, based on your posts, I'd say they're all more thoughtful, intelligent, and well behaved than you.


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 7:13 PM
Post #137 of 357 (6222 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I disagree with you. If you can't tell the difference between daycare because you have to work and the inherent dangers of climbing (that your kids did not ask for) AND there ARE things you have to give up as a parent, then you probably do not have the common sense to be a parent, let alone a climber. I'm not saying to teach them to stay at home and learn to knit and watch TV all day, but there is a difference between raising them in a bubble and exposing them to dangerous situations that they aren't able to handle. This is why kids don't drive. Or hang out in bars...Climbing is a serious, adult situation for adults. Thats not to say you can't teach them to climb...just be smart about it. And less selfish?


(This post was edited by karmiclimber on Aug 4, 2009, 7:14 PM)


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 7:18 PM
Post #138 of 357 (6215 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I disagree with you. If you can't tell the difference between daycare because you have to work and the inherent dangers of climbing (that your kids did not ask for) AND there ARE things you have to give up as a parent, then you probably do not have the common sense to be a parent, let alone a climber. I'm not saying to teach them to stay at home and learn to knit and watch TV all day, but there is a difference between raising them in a bubble and exposing them to dangerous situations that they aren't able to handle. This is why kids don't drive. Or hang out in bars...Climbing is a serious, adult situation for adults. Thats not to say you can't teach them to climb...just be smart about it. And less selfish?

What is selfish about what I've said?

Oh yeah, and this is still my life too.


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #139 of 357 (6211 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I forgot to add that 3/4 of my kids climb better than you too.


gmggg


Aug 4, 2009, 7:20 PM
Post #140 of 357 (6208 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [durangoclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The FU is hardly enough. What a jackass. My kids started when they were two (yes two). They have grown into incredible kids, climbers, and friends to even some adults. They are very well behaved. Your elitist attitude sucks. Hope you climb here in Durango someday so my little 12 y/o bad ass can climb circles around your punk ass.

These are getting to be too much. The OP's comments were a little harshly stated/trollish and I'm sure your elitist attitudes about your kids climbing ability is accurate, but as many others have said there is a big difference between kids at a crag actually climbing and unsupervised toddlers at a crag misbehaving.

Why is it that someones annoyance with a particular set of children is seen as an attack on all of your babies?

Why do so many of you think that countering with the climbing abilities of your 8-13 year olds has any relevance to the OP's topic?


Basta916


Aug 4, 2009, 7:23 PM
Post #141 of 357 (6204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 311

Re: [majid_sabet] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
several weeks ago while hiking on a popular trail, I ran in to a completely naked 3-4 years old boy playing behind the rock with no parents in sight.

So I yell to nearest person in the trial if they know who this kid was belonging to and she said oh yaa, his parents are over there. Then i said; call them up and let come and get this kid or or I will be taking him down.

A minute later,some ignorant lady comes and says, yes that is my boy and what seems to be the problem ?

i reply nothing seems to be a problem but kids do disappear which make s a CF of hell for others to find your kid then she goes come on boy and kids run toward the trail. then she tells her husband; hey jeff, can you watch the boy while boy is running toward class 2 river.

WTF

So I ran in to guy and told him that river kills people in 1 minute so you may want to stop your kid from getting near it and the guy was so fucking relax like he did not give a sh*t if his kid died.

well, if that is you up there then do not bring your kid cause you will piss off people.

holly crap Majid.. this must be your first post that makes sense...

and to all parents out there that think " my kid is an angel!!!Angelic" If thats your mindset, you are delusional.Wake up. Remember the way you were.
kids are only good if they first learned to listen and behave.
Kids are welcome if they behave, and it's parents/guardians job to make sure of that. Not everyone has to enjoy your screaming brat...Do your job. If you have them , take care of them. Same goes for dogs.


budman


Aug 4, 2009, 7:29 PM
Post #142 of 357 (6191 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 170

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was lucky, my chidlren like climbing. After being a parent for 30 years they still climb with their dad. Not as often as I would like but we still hang at the crag when possible. The coolest thing was that they became part of the community and still are, in their own way. As parents it's important to introduce our children to different things in order for them to be more well rounded individuals. Like I said, I was lucky they liked climbing. The smiles on our faces when we climb together tell it all. Hope your daughter ends up a climber so she and you can share the time and the passion. One generation giving to the next.


wjca


Aug 4, 2009, 7:58 PM
Post #143 of 357 (6150 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545

Re: [subantz] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

subantz wrote:
Swearing does make you look kools. I dont like or dislike kids, but would rather not be around them climbing. Simply because swear sometimes, Ok alot, and the last thing I want to hear is," HEY watch your mouth there are kids here." Like I give a shit. I usually tell parents in this case. I am not going to watch what I say I am not in court or church. Like you would find me in church anyways. They usually pack up. If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets. If the parents yell at you Yell back. Show those little fuckers that you have a freedom of speech and you intend on exercising your right. This thould help fuel your fireAngelic

Congratulations. You may be a bigger douche than the OP.


IsayAutumn


Aug 4, 2009, 8:02 PM
Post #144 of 357 (6141 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2008
Posts: 355

Re: [wjca] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

wjca wrote:
subantz wrote:
Swearing does make you look kools. I dont like or dislike kids, but would rather not be around them climbing. Simply because swear sometimes, Ok alot, and the last thing I want to hear is," HEY watch your mouth there are kids here." Like I give a shit. I usually tell parents in this case. I am not going to watch what I say I am not in court or church. Like you would find me in church anyways. They usually pack up. If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets. If the parents yell at you Yell back. Show those little fuckers that you have a freedom of speech and you intend on exercising your right. This thould help fuel your fireAngelic

Congratulations. You may be a bigger douche than the OP.



Kids suck.


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 8:06 PM
Post #145 of 357 (6138 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
There you go again, putting your opinions of things onto other people.

So I should stay home and take care of my kids. And not have a job? What shall I feed them with? What shall I do when I'm so stressed out by doing nothing but taking care of them that I want to kill them? Do I go to work? Well, how often? Oh please tell me oh fountain of wisdom.

I have four kids, based on your posts, I'd say they're all more thoughtful, intelligent, and well behaved than you.


Job is an essential you fucktard. If you can't support your family enough to keep them happy then you are failing miserably. When you're a parent, you must think about your kids first (i.e. if I fell on an approach 10 years ago and broke my ankle it would hurt. If I fell now it would hurt, I wouldn't be able to work, and I wouldn't be able to play with my kids or do work around the house. As a post earlier noted, you see things differently. This is perfect example.

As for your model kids, that's great I hope they pass on the torch by looking out for number 1 first just like ol pops.


In reply to:
I forgot to add that 3/4 of my kids climb better than you too.

I could care less what your kids climb. I don't update my climbing logs because I could give a shit less what waterheads like you think. If your kids are as impressive as you think they could beat me in a mile run. You are acting like those annoying people who always want to whip out their wallets and shove pictures of their kids in my face. Those people crack me up.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 8:08 PM
Post #146 of 357 (6136 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:
dingus wrote:
Bitch all you want - it changes nothing. Our kids bother you more than they bother us. We are way worse than dog people.

DMT

You implying there's something wrong with dog-people?

[img]http://www.billpullman.org/film/spaceballs/S3.jpg[/img]

Space Balls. I want to go to Ridiculous Speed!

DMT


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 8:12 PM
Post #147 of 357 (6124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockreaver wrote:
Parenting rescued me from a life of traveling at will, having plenty of money whenever I wanted something and generally getting-life-on however I chose. Boy I'm so glad they pulled me out of a life like that. Sounds so awful. Crazy

There's some truth to that... truly. But in return I have a ton of fun packed into 3 human beings sometimes I call them "human bings"

At a basic level our pleasure and fun are irrelevant of course. Our DNA wants to reproduce and we either heed the call or we do not.

Everyhthing else is just detail. The breeders ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS win.

Always.

Non breeders are irrelevant, and the end of the cycle. Dirt to dirt.

DMT


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 8:25 PM
Post #148 of 357 (6104 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I didn't want kids at all. It was kind of weird. I felt like a freak of nature because I didn't. I never told my wife but she knew. I had different ambitions and I wanted to pursue them. Then there was a terrific accident - The End - and I kind of fell apart as a person. She still wanted kids and I didn't.

I just went along with it though as I thought maybe I'd grow into it or something. (I was too farking young to know better.) We had them. Because of them I realized I had a lot of serious issues. In time I've worked through most of them.

Now I really enjoy having them. They mean the world to me. I parent just like my parents did and life continues. My kids are "bomber" kids. I just think they are so great.

But I didn't want them at first. However I knew when I agreed to "sire" them that I was there good and bad and they'd have a father from then on.

I've tried to do a good job of that but it's certainly a learning process. I'd say that I do a good job though. I get compliments everywhere we take them about how well they behave. They really do too. When I lean on them and give them the "Quiet or Die" order they tidy right up. I don't do a lot of that though and in our home I think mayhem is a lot of fun. I really let them cut loose. They better not break anything (usually I do that playing dodge ball with them).

I'll build them all sorts of crazy stuff and we have fun.

I believe that desire to reproduce wasn't there for me. However... I have an extremely strong desire to "practice" and well...Blush

So yeah. Life goes on. The world turns. Snow melts.

I like the song by Smashmouth "All Star" it's how I try to live. Cheryl Crow's "Winding Road" is a good tune too but my favorite is Twisted Sister, "We're Not Gonna Take It".

So I wouldn't say I'm a mindless conformist. In fact I'm a bit of an anarchist. I question authority a lot.

What the hell was I saying?

Oh yeah. I didn't want them either but they've grown on me. They keep me poor. I could have a full trad rack with all the fixin's but instead I've got a set of stoppers, well adjusted kids and a happy life. Wink

Dirt to Dirt - Somehow there's got to be some Monty Python in there somewhere...


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 8:47 PM
Post #149 of 357 (6086 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bobbj22 wrote:
In reply to:
There you go again, putting your opinions of things onto other people.

So I should stay home and take care of my kids. And not have a job? What shall I feed them with? What shall I do when I'm so stressed out by doing nothing but taking care of them that I want to kill them? Do I go to work? Well, how often? Oh please tell me oh fountain of wisdom.

I have four kids, based on your posts, I'd say they're all more thoughtful, intelligent, and well behaved than you.


Job is an essential you fucktard. If you can't support your family enough to keep them happy then you are failing miserably. When you're a parent, you must think about your kids first (i.e. if I fell on an approach 10 years ago and broke my ankle it would hurt. If I fell now it would hurt, I wouldn't be able to work, and I wouldn't be able to play with my kids or do work around the house. As a post earlier noted, you see things differently. This is perfect example.

As for your model kids, that's great I hope they pass on the torch by looking out for number 1 first just like ol pops.


In reply to:
I forgot to add that 3/4 of my kids climb better than you too.

I could care less what your kids climb. I don't update my climbing logs because I could give a shit less what waterheads like you think. If your kids are as impressive as you think they could beat me in a mile run. You are acting like those annoying people who always want to whip out their wallets and shove pictures of their kids in my face. Those people crack me up.

You are rather simple minded.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #150 of 357 (6072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I didn't want kids and said so, all through my 20s. I partied instead. Like it was 1999, ddeja vu all over again.

30ish rolled around and MY bio clock kicked in...

I said to my girl of 9-years: what say we get married and have a couple of kids?

Presto quicko.... (I climbed Lucky Streaks in Tuolumne Meadows on the day my kid was born, coming up on 18 years ago, in just two weeks now)

I still party like its 1999 though. Wear the same clothes too. Even the underwear.

DMT


bobbj22


Aug 4, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #151 of 357 (4149 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

YOU are rather empty-minded.


mnottingham


Aug 4, 2009, 9:08 PM
Post #152 of 357 (4142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2008
Posts: 18

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location.

lena_chita wrote:
3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip

The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.

Amen brother. The guy who posted seemed more concerned about the safety of the kids then the three soccer moms who were neglecting them. I'm sick of parents assuming higher moral ground because......they're parents(?) So some critter crawled out your vag! congratulations! You parents are superior to all of us non-parents. You can procreate? We're all impressed. All the BS about "you can't possibly appreciate the challenges of parenthood...blah blah.. daycare..etc" I do appreciate the challenges and expenses of raising children, that's why I've decided to live my life without them. Go ahead parents, tell me my life is worthless, unfullfilled, and empty. We non-parents have heard all that propaganda before. In ten years those three women will be spending every weekend at soccer or field hockey or baseball games. They'll be socking away every dime for college, praying their daughters don't get pregnant, and wondering when their son will crash their car. While we, my non-parent friends and I, will still be singing our favorite tune -- "I'm so glad I don't have children", buying shiny new cams and taking expensive overseas climbing trips with money that would have been wasted on some brat's college education.

In a complete coincidence, Saturday at the Home Depot i took out some kid with my cart full of lumber. Actually, he ran straight into the 2x4 on my cart, and there was nothing I could have done to prevent it. Seriously. I was horrified. Especially when I realized Dad was about 6'3" 250. He was not damaged, maybe just a small dent in his skullWink

I really like kids, it's the bad parents that get to me.


bigevilgrape


Aug 4, 2009, 9:47 PM
Post #153 of 357 (4117 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
I'm not completely surprised that you would support the singularly selfish perspective here, but I am somewhat surprised that you don't have more empathy for those who have children.

Curt

What strikes me as selfish is a group of parents who's children don't yet know how to act at the crag bring said children along with them to a crowded place and according to the OP don't do anything about the situation, but decided what the hell we'll ruin everyone else's day by toting them along with us.

I don't see how me expecting children who go along with their parents to know how to behave safely and appropriately is selfish.


lena_chita wrote:
I agree that people should'nt have kids unless they have thought through the rumifications of that decision and are willing to accept the resonsibilities that come with that decision. Idon't agree with the rest. Children learn by doing...

I think what you are failing to understand my underlying point. Rumney is an inappropriate place to bring 3 toddlers who don't understand how to behave when you take them rockclimbing. The appropriate place to teach these behaviors is at a quiet local crag. Despite what people think Rumney, White Horse and Cathedral are not the only places to go climbing in New Hampshire and if you are a local to the area there are better choices for a weekend outing with children. When I took my rock climbing class in college we went to several rarely visited climbing spots in that area, so I know they are around. (Or professors had the good sense not to bring noisy obnoxious college kids to crowded places) Once they have learned how to behave safely at a quieter location bring them anywhere you like.

I am not an anti-child person. I spent 3 years of my life working part time at a YMCA teaching cildren between 6 months and 5 years old how to swim. And according to surveys filled out by parents, and requests by parents to have me as thier childs teacher for the next session parents loved me. At the same time I would prefer to climb when no children are around and I'm fortunate enough that this is the case 80% of the time I climb. I realize that it is unreasonable to expect never to have to share a crag with a family, but it doesn't mean its my favorite thing int he world.

I also think its important to get kids outdoors. If we have any hope of preserving these places for the future we need to get kids involved in the outdoors. (I've spent many days taking kids outdoors to climb and do ropes courses because I think its important. But we went to quiet often empty crags during week days)But that doesn't mean you should bring them to the only sport climbing destination in the north east to teach them how to behave while rock climbing.


(This post was edited by bigevilgrape on Aug 4, 2009, 10:22 PM)


rockreaver


Aug 4, 2009, 10:16 PM
Post #154 of 357 (4100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2009
Posts: 187

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I wasted the best years of my life chasing money. Now I'm older (a bit) and wiser (arguable) and I'm chasing the earth. It's a breath-taking playground and I dig it.

I have no idea where my love of high places went but for 10 years it was buried under love for stuff and crap. Now I'm oh... 100 pounds lighter, climbing, laughing and valuing life a lot more.

It's kind of perfect really. Instead of my kids keeping me from doing they are driving me on to do it more. I would love to see the looks on the faces of the other kids when my son says he spent the summer climbing mountains and rock faces, sleeping in tents, warming up under fires and getting back to a more basic life.

Now I'm preparing to give him stories for when Christmas break is over and he can say he spent the winter in snow-shoes and high places.

We are going to have a ton of fun. We are getting soft-gear now. Shells and such to spin into fall. I'm digging life. Big-time!

Kids? Where? Oh yeah mine? They are tied in behind me. SWEET! Wink At least if they are tied in I can keep an eye on them.


subantz


Aug 4, 2009, 10:20 PM
Post #155 of 357 (4092 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [wjca] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

YEA I WIN. Hope I pissed you off if so mission accomplished. I WIN, LOSER


jakedatc


Aug 4, 2009, 10:25 PM
Post #156 of 357 (4083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [budman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

budman wrote:
Wish my Mom had taken me climbing when I was 3 1/2. That's why I took my kids when they were very young. If you take you children climbing, then climb with them. If you are there to climb then leave them home, unless there is adult supervision. For those not very tolerant of children, act like an adult and pick somewhere else to climb. Give the kids their day, there will be another day for your project. As to the language thing, if you can't see why it's wrong and can't respect that then you probably have no respect for your self as well. Oh yeh, taking your kids outside to climb is one of the best things for you and them.

what the FUCK? Let the KIDS have THEIR day? Fuck you, If i'm driving 3+ hours somewhere i'm climbing for fucking ME , fuck your kid. If i was there with those stupid people and their obnoxious kids i would have moved to a different crag.. LOUDLY bitching about how rude parents are that cannot control their spawn.

Rumney is a SPORT climbing area.. projecting and pushing limits is what it is FOR. Go bring your kid to some backwoods TR crag

Parents have a CHOICE to bring their kids climbing.. CHOICE. IF you want to go climb bad enough you CAN make it happen, somehow. Others at the crag do NOT have a choice if YOUR kid shows up and is a screaming shithead. They do not have a CHOICE if they get plugged in the head by a rock thrown off a cliff. They don't have a CHOICE seeing your child go flopping off a cliff to their probable death if they aren't watched and go over an edge.

I worked with children for 4 years when i was younger and now i work in either the high school or college setting. while i'm WORKING i will watch my language. If i'm out climbing and something causes me to swear. I don't give a FUCK if your child hears me and then repeats it for the next 3 months.

The parents should have acted like ADULTS and watched their offspring so they didn't piss everyone else off. These parents don't sound like they were climbing WITH their children.. it sounds like they BROUGHT them climbing.. like little yappy dogs in purses.

I tolerate well behaved kids and kids that are controlled by their parents. As i said i was part of a group with a 3 yr old who barely said boo the whole weekend.


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 10:29 PM
Post #157 of 357 (4080 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [budman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I totally agree with everything you posted. Maybe someday I'll get lucky and my little one will get over her fear of heights...if not, I'll be no less proud of her. She is pretty rad already, if I do say so myself. I just don't ever want to be the parent FORCING my love/belief/whatever on my child.


karmiclimber


Aug 4, 2009, 10:40 PM
Post #158 of 357 (4067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [mnottingham] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mnottingham wrote:
bigevilgrape wrote:
I'm going to break my silence here.

I think it is inappropriate to bring 3 children up to a destination crag on a weekend. Children are more suited to being at smaller crags with fewer people. And I think it takes a lot of gull to criticize someone for swearing just because they have kids with them. Its an adult location and Rumney is a place people take big trips to. I see no reason why anyone should have to change their behavior because you decided to bring your children to an adult location.

lena_chita wrote:
3. You obviously don't have kids, so you casn't possibly appreciate the difficulties that adults with kids face, in terms of finding appropriate overnight childcare for young children.

Invalid: I know the difficulties in finding overnight childcare because I have been the one watching peoples kids many times, but what the hell. You CHOSE to have kids so you chose to take on this challenge. (We won't go into my thoughts for people who didn't chose to have their kids) Sometimes you have to put off a climbing trip and wait until the kids are old enough to behave safely and appropriately for that trip

The other problem I see in this picture is 3 toddlers and 3 adults. Its one thing to bring one toddler out to the crag, but 3? That's asking for trouble. At a place where there is very little room at the bottom of the crag and with 3 little ones running around someone is gonna take a digger over the edge and go tumbling down the very steep hill behind them.

I don't think its a question of leaving all kids at home, its about knowing when it is appropriate to bring them with you. To me this is a case where it was clearly inappropriate as well as unsafe. And to be honest I see more parents who don't know how to deal with their kids when they take them climbing then those who do. (Which is exactly how I feel about crag dogs since people feel the need to draw similarities)

And for the love of god if you don't want your children to hear anyone swear then you shouldn't take them to places you know there will be swearing.

Amen brother. The guy who posted seemed more concerned about the safety of the kids then the three soccer moms who were neglecting them. I'm sick of parents assuming higher moral ground because......they're parents(?) So some critter crawled out your vag! congratulations! You parents are superior to all of us non-parents. You can procreate? We're all impressed. All the BS about "you can't possibly appreciate the challenges of parenthood...blah blah.. daycare..etc" I do appreciate the challenges and expenses of raising children, that's why I've decided to live my life without them. Go ahead parents, tell me my life is worthless, unfullfilled, and empty. We non-parents have heard all that propaganda before. In ten years those three women will be spending every weekend at soccer or field hockey or baseball games. They'll be socking away every dime for college, praying their daughters don't get pregnant, and wondering when their son will crash their car. While we, my non-parent friends and I, will still be singing our favorite tune -- "I'm so glad I don't have children", buying shiny new cams and taking expensive overseas climbing trips with money that would have been wasted on some brat's college education.

In a complete coincidence, Saturday at the Home Depot i took out some kid with my cart full of lumber. Actually, he ran straight into the 2x4 on my cart, and there was nothing I could have done to prevent it. Seriously. I was horrified. Especially when I realized Dad was about 6'3" 250. He was not damaged, maybe just a small dent in his skullWink

I really like kids, it's the bad parents that get to me.

I'm a mom. I 100 percent agree with you! Not with the not-have-kids part obviously, haha. So many people do not look before they leap with kids. I decided it was something I wanted, I could fit it in my budget and did it knowing full well what impact it would have on my activities (climbing, hiking, etc.) as well as the rest of my life. And I will never be caught bitching about my responsbility as a mom...its a gift...not some burden that I have trouble fitting into my schedule. And she is a person...her own person...and I am charged with her safety.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 10:41 PM
Post #159 of 357 (4063 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
I tolerate well behaved kids

Well that's mighty big of you. Now I shall tolerate you.

Subject to new information of course.

DMT


shorty


Aug 4, 2009, 10:51 PM
Post #160 of 357 (4049 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 1266

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
I still party like its 1999 though. Wear the same clothes too. Even the underwear.

Too...Much...Information


shockabuku


Aug 4, 2009, 10:51 PM
Post #161 of 357 (4050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bobbj22 wrote:
YOU are rather empty-minded.

Maybe, may be.


jakedatc


Aug 4, 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #162 of 357 (4038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
I tolerate well behaved kids

Well that's mighty big of you. Now I shall tolerate you.

Subject to new information of course.

DMT

not sure if that was meant to be good or not. but it got me thinking..

Should people tolerate folks letting their cells ring in movies, talking to their friends loudly while others are trying to watch? Should parents bring small children to movies they aren't actually there to watch but rather be dragged along as accessories? Would you sit there in church while your kid screamed their head off?

why is it Ok for them to bring them climbing and be rude but not Ok in other situations?

I don't get why people keep bringing up WELL BEHAVED children.. this isn't what the OP was talking about. These kids were spastic, crying, danger to themselves with little to no reprimand.

there looks to have been no.. "teaching about nature, wilderness experience, outdoor adventure" it sounds like it was we're going to climb, you sit there with out friend and we'll talk to you in a few hours.

Re: Wonderwoman. Tiff you know as well as i do that the scenario described is not the status quo for Rumney. I've seen far more clusterfucks at the gunks than i have at Rumney and i've been at Rumney like 200 times more than the gunks.


dingus


Aug 4, 2009, 11:10 PM
Post #163 of 357 (4015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Should people tolerate folks letting their cells ring in movies, talking to their friends loudly while others are trying to watch? Should parents bring small children to movies they aren't actually there to watch but rather be dragged along as accessories?

In my new mode of benevolent tolerance Ima gunna break it down for you...

a movie theater is a commercial business. Customers pay money to go inside and receive a certain experience. These customers hold certain expectations and in turn hold the business establishment to those expectations.

On the other hand Rumney is NOT a business. You AREN'T paying anyone to provide you with your sculpted experience. In the cases of many public climbing venues, those parents own an equal share of the place as you.

But you knew all this. What's your real point here?

Your way or the highway, right?

Whyn't YOU go to an out of the way crag, instead? When I feel antisocial that's what I do. We have our Rumney equivalents round here and the socalled adults are no improvement over the kids.

Chances are good I might find you more annoying than the brat down the way.... what then?

No no, See I shall tolerate you. I promised. If that tolerance causes me grief then I will conduct myself elsewhere.

In fact I already did!

Cheers
DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Aug 4, 2009, 11:11 PM)


kriso9tails


Aug 4, 2009, 11:11 PM
Post #164 of 357 (4011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
I don't get why people keep bringing up WELL BEHAVED children.. this isn't what the OP was talking about. These kids were spastic, crying, danger to themselves with little to no reprimand.

Probably because the OP started the rant portion of his post with this:

In reply to:
Leave your children at home. They do not belong at the crag, and by bringing them, you are not only ruining someone else's good time, you are putting them in a hazardous environment where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.

It comes off as a universal indictment.


eastvillage


Aug 4, 2009, 11:17 PM
Post #165 of 357 (4007 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 262

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Lot's of emotion here, naturally, as kids are involved.
Back to the OP:I will say that the base area's of popular crags are very dangerous places and having kids or dogs running and lounging around puts them in considerable danger of being hit by rocks or dropped equipment.
it seems negligent to expose very small children to these very real threats. Check out the Mountain Project thread about the massive rockfall on Rewritten.
The cliffs are dangerous whether you are are below them, on them or on top of them.


jakedatc


Aug 4, 2009, 11:23 PM
Post #166 of 357 (4001 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No, it's not a business but people do spend plenty of money driving there and camping to stay there. It is a public place so people should have respect for others and conduct themselves and control their children in a respectful way.

I'll bring my stupid lab next time and let her run amuck every where. She can have a great outdoor experience. Sure she'll be a pain in the ass.. she loves chasing things.. digging in the dirt, eating anything she can find at or below face level. she really loves barking at people and other dogs and doesn't seem to have a limit to how long she can keep it up. If parents let their kids do what they want, why should i not let my dog?

I'm not antisocial. . I talk to tons of people up there. i have an above average knowledge of the area and since the guidebook is out of date i have no problem helping people out and chatting.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 4, 2009, 11:23 PM
Post #167 of 357 (3999 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think the thing that got people upset was more the "tone" of the OP's rant(as had been mentioned before).
- "Leave your damn kids at home" as a title
- Attempting to belittle such a person who wouldbring a child to the crag with phrases such as
In reply to:
....where the supervision is distracted by ideations of sending some sick 5.9 routes.
-
In reply to:
Keep your fucking kids at home.
-
In reply to:
Leave the little bastards at home
-
In reply to:
don't fucking care how cute they look in their little full body harness, or if they are the next chris fucking sharma.


Troll, I still asert. But it's easy to see how that viciousness, which DOES seem to be aimed at all people with kids, and NOT just the type he's describing. It's not hard to iwonder if the dud may have taken at least a little poetic license in painting the picture of these gawdawful women with their children.


The dude pretty clearly has anger management issues. Or else just a well-seasoned troll(which pretty much means he has anger issues in and of itself).

Had the thread been written with a different tone, as has also already been said - the guy would NOT have gotten the grief he did, but more likely some tut-tutting, and requests to try to understand that sometimes people try to plan as best they can, when it comes to kids, and things don't actually turn out as they'd expected.

He asked for a fight, whether he is aware of that fact or not, and that's what he got. He set it up that way from the get go.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 4, 2009, 11:38 PM
Post #168 of 357 (3991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I totally agree. As a single mom of a 3 1/2 year old, I would not dream of taking my child on a climbing trip. To the gym? Yes. On a camping trip? Yes. Hiking? Yup.
I would not take her on a climbing trip (yet) because its not the place for a toddler, for numerous reasons:
1. I can't keep an eye on her and concentrate on climbing/belaying...both of those things would need my undivided attention..

you decide what to do with your child, of course, but to me this looks like the other side of the extreme. Of course she needs your undivided attention-- which is why, when my daughter was 2.5yo, we only brought her on a trip when there were 3 adults, or a larger number of odd-number adults in a party. She was supervised by one adult at all times, and that adult did nothing but supervise her. In practical terms it looked like this: I played with my daughter/fed her/ took her for walks while my husband climbed and person 3 belayed. then my husband belayed while person 3 climbed. Then person 3 belayed while I climbed and my husband watched the child. Occasionally person 3 watched her, but mostly it was a job divided between me and my husband. Not every climber is suitable for the role of person 3, but we had one or two who were suitable...

The first time ever that we had two climbers and the children along was last year, when the younger one was 5.5yo, and the older one was 9.5 yo. By that age I felt confident that the kids knew the basics.

karmiclimber wrote:
2. What if something happens to me or my partner and one of us is injured?.

That's why you need person 3 ( or more). And that's why you are not going to remote locations where you would be the only climbing party.

karmiclimber wrote:
3. Snakes, poison ivy, crag dogs, edges of cliffs...etc?.

All potentially hazardous, but no more so than they would be on a hike, b/c remember, there is one person whose undivided attention is on the child.

karmiclimber wrote:
4. What if she starts harassing other climbers who are trying to belay or climb?

Not if the adult in charge is doing his/her job. If the child gets antsy or disruptive, the adult takes her for a walk, away from the crag, to walk off steam.

karmiclimber wrote:
Honestly, the whole thing sounds like a mess to me. But when she is older and I do take her, you damn well better believe she will not be running around, screaming and acting all crazy like.

Good!


Partner wideguy


Aug 4, 2009, 11:55 PM
Post #169 of 357 (3975 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15046

Re: [austinnokc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

austinnokc wrote:
Wow, This thread has gone crazy.

Crazy is right!! By page 3 three people had agreed with Jake, possibly a first on ANY topic on RC.n00bTongue


ANNNND one of them WASN'T the OP, who he was supporting, who ripped him on Page 4!

Dogs and cats, living in sin!Shocked

I have no issue with well behaved anything at the crag... kids, dogs, pythons ... or adults. Poorly controlled or poorly behaved kids, dogs, pythons, or adults should have their behavior corrected. (for especially distasteful adults, perhaps a #7 tricam swung in a large arc. ..)

and +1 for the OP being a tool.


(This post was edited by wideguy on Aug 5, 2009, 12:00 AM)


reno


Aug 5, 2009, 12:08 AM
Post #170 of 357 (3963 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
I'll bring my stupid lab next time and let her run amuck every where. She can have a great outdoor experience. Sure she'll be a pain in the ass.. she loves chasing things.. digging in the dirt, eating anything she can find at or below face level. she really loves barking at people and other dogs and doesn't seem to have a limit to how long she can keep it up. If parents let their kids do what they want, why should i not let my dog?

Not having read through this entire (stupid) thread, I may end up getting GU'd here, but did the OP's post talk about these kids pissing on other people's packs, eating their food, etc?

They're people, Jake. Kids, sure, but people nonetheless, and they have as much right to be at any given public location as you do.

A public crag is not the sole property of climbers, no matter how important or selfish you are, Jake.


Partner robdotcalm


Aug 5, 2009, 12:19 AM
Post #171 of 357 (3955 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:

Iand the kids were still rather loud and disruptive to other people, though less so than the first case, b/c the parents were very vigilant. In this particular case I happen to know that the kids have certain ADHD and Aspergers issues.

It appears that these kids have personality traits that will help them become good climbers .

cheers, r.c


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 12:22 AM
Post #172 of 357 (3948 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Lena, none of what I said was aimed at you. You seem to know what you are doing...and you have a good situation with people watching children at all times. It just seems like some people have zero common sense when it comes to kids and climbing. Or kids in general. But like I said in my one post...every situation and child is different.


blueeyedclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 12:26 AM
Post #173 of 357 (3943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
These kids were spastic, crying, danger to themselves with little to no reprimand.
According to the op. Are you really going to take someone's side who refers to children as little bastards?

In reply to:
there looks to have been no.. "teaching about nature, wilderness experience, outdoor adventure"
Once again, according to the op.

In reply to:
it sounds like it was we're going to climb, you sit there with out friend and we'll talk to you in a few hours.
see above.

In reply to:
Re: Wonderwoman. Tiff you know as well as i do that the scenario described is not the status quo for Rumney. I've seen far more clusterfucks at the gunks than i have at Rumney and i've been at Rumney like 200 times more than the gunks.

THe Gunks do indeed have clusterfucks, but they are usually centralized in a few locations, whereas any gym n00b can throw themselves at any route at Rumney without worrying too much about anything. Now, don't take this too much to heart. The one or two times Tiff and I go to Rumney a year, we have a blast, but to say it's not a zoo on the weekends is not Korect, sir!

JoshCool


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 12:32 AM
Post #174 of 357 (3935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
I'll bring my stupid lab next time and let her run amuck every where. She can have a great outdoor experience. Sure she'll be a pain in the ass.. she loves chasing things.. digging in the dirt, eating anything she can find at or below face level. she really loves barking at people and other dogs and doesn't seem to have a limit to how long she can keep it up. If parents let their kids do what they want, why should i not let my dog?

Not having read through this entire (stupid) thread, I may end up getting GU'd here, but did the OP's post talk about these kids pissing on other people's packs, eating their food, etc?

They're people, Jake. Kids, sure, but people nonetheless, and they have as much right to be at any given public location as you do.

A public crag is not the sole property of climbers, no matter how important or selfish you are, Jake.

I actually wont bring her, she belongs to my parents and she was (not) trained while i was at college so she can't be trusted anywhere. But neither could these children with the present supervision, clearly.

and EXACTLY, The crag is for everyone.. which means I or anyone else shouldn't have to have a shitty time.. or have to move to a different crag because some parent's can't get their kids to stfu or make a complete clusterfuck of the base.

not sure how i'm being selfish saying that 1 set of parents shouldn't ruin a whole crag by their inattentiveness.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 12:37 AM
Post #175 of 357 (3934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
No, it's not a business but people do spend plenty of money driving there and camping to stay there. It is a public place

So's the beach. There is no difference, at the end of the day.

I totally agree about safety issues and said so, btw. But screaming, running around like kids, throwing stones.... as disrespectful as it is of your personal privacy, so is the big group of loud mouth shit talkers wanking abut routes with names like 'that's 12c over there.'

Now I do understand the annoyance. I do. And a good rant is therapeutic, carry on.

Its not all that common in my experience. And its never going to change.

I'm tellin ya - watch A few episodes of Malcom in the Middle. You don't even have to watch a whole episode, about 5 minutes each (channel 40 reruns, hehe, channel flipping, with 8 channels of shit to choose from you eventually see the whole thing in mosiac!)...

Its explains EVERYTHING about brain dead parents.

DMT


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 12:40 AM
Post #176 of 357 (4380 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
These kids were spastic, crying, danger to themselves with little to no reprimand.
According to the op. Are you really going to take someone's side who refers to children as little bastards?

In reply to:
there looks to have been no.. "teaching about nature, wilderness experience, outdoor adventure"
Once again, according to the op.

In reply to:
it sounds like it was we're going to climb, you sit there with out friend and we'll talk to you in a few hours.
see above.

In reply to:
Re: Wonderwoman. Tiff you know as well as i do that the scenario described is not the status quo for Rumney. I've seen far more clusterfucks at the gunks than i have at Rumney and i've been at Rumney like 200 times more than the gunks.

THe Gunks do indeed have clusterfucks, but they are usually centralized in a few locations, whereas any gym n00b can throw themselves at any route at Rumney without worrying too much about anything. Now, don't take this too much to heart. The one or two times Tiff and I go to Rumney a year, we have a blast, but to say it's not a zoo on the weekends is not Korect, sir!

JoshCool

Last 2 weekends i've been to Rumney it has not been a zoo and i've not had to wait in line for anything i wanted to get on. regardless of grade. I skip parking lot and meadows if they are busy in the AM or do 1-2 warm ups and move on. ask Jay, Matt, kate etc.. they were there. CF's are centralized at rumney too. parking lot.. meadows.. 5.8 crag.. use your feet and head and you can find an empty crag. Ever been to Pulse? awesome routes.. ghost town.


gmggg


Aug 5, 2009, 12:42 AM
Post #177 of 357 (4380 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [rockreaver] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I like the song by Smashmouth "All Star" it's how I try to live. Cheryl Crow's "Winding Road" is a good tune too but my favorite is Twisted Sister, "We're Not Gonna Take It".

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Enjoy climbing with your kids, but please don't teach them about music.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 12:42 AM
Post #178 of 357 (4380 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
and EXACTLY, The crag is for everyone.. which means I or anyone else shouldn't have to have a shitty time

LOL!

In reply to:
.. or have to move to a different crag because some parent's can't get their kids to stfu or make a complete clusterfuck of the base.

I feel the same way when I'm at a place like Table Mtn and a large group of climbers show up loud talking. OK, I don't feel the same way, I don't feel as though my personal requirements should dictate their behavior. Its my partner Angus - soon as a large group shows up he's all SEEYA.

Maybe you should follow him?

In reply to:
not sure how i'm being selfish saying that 1 set of parents shouldn't ruin a whole crag by their inattentiveness.

Well, reread the snippets I quoted from you above and fester on it a bit, I think yu'll see how some might interpret your reply in selfish terms.

Tolerance!
DMT


reno


Aug 5, 2009, 12:53 AM
Post #179 of 357 (4365 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
I actually wont bring her, she belongs to my parents and she was (not) trained while i was at college so she can't be trusted anywhere.

Well, I could fix that for ya. Cost ya a 12 pack of beer and three days of guided climbing in New England. Camhead, Climbsomething, and a few others can vouch for my ability to train a proper crag dog. Let me know. Cool

In reply to:
But neither could these children with the present supervision, clearly.

At the risk of repeating someone else here, "According to the OP."

In reply to:
and EXACTLY, The crag is for everyone.. which means I or anyone else shouldn't have to have a shitty time.. or have to move to a different crag because some parent's can't get their kids to stfu or make a complete clusterfuck of the base.

But neither are you guaranteed a good time, peace and quiet, or a clean environment. What makes your rights to have a crag without annoying kids any greater than the rights of a parent (or parents) to bring their kids outdoors for a day?

In reply to:
not sure how i'm being selfish saying that 1 set of parents shouldn't ruin a whole crag by their inattentiveness.

Because you're saying, essentially, "What these other people are doing is annoying to me. Make it stop, so I can have the day I want to have!"

I don't really like people in general. Chalk it up to too many years of being lied to, mistreated, and taken for granted. Hell, call me an old curmudgeonly bastard. I don't care.

The point is that when I want a peaceful day climbing, I don't go to a popular local crag (and we have plenty here in the Denver area.) I go where there are no people. If, forbid, I should decide to go to a popular local crag, I accept that there might... nay, WILL... be people there that will most probably annoy me.

And I damn sure wouldn't judge someone for bringing their kids outside for a day. We need more of that, and less parents plopping their kid in front of a TV with the PS2 or a DVD.

YMMV.


dynosore


Aug 5, 2009, 12:53 AM
Post #180 of 357 (4365 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [curt] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
climbsomething wrote:
He is so going to beat your brittle ass at the father-son picnic. Hehehe.

His pediatrician says he will be 6' 6" when he's fully grown, so I have definitely considered that possibility.

Curt

Yeah...I was 5'8" in 7th grade and grew all the way to....5'10" Tongue. Stop feeding him now and you still have a chance!


Partner wideguy


Aug 5, 2009, 1:02 AM
Post #181 of 357 (4358 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15046

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
plopping their kid in front of a TV with the PS2 or a DVD.

YMMV.

EXACTLY!! That's I'm not taking my kids until I have enough money to buy them a portable DVD to park them in front of at the crag, so they don't bother anyone.

I'm considerate that way!


MikeSaint


Aug 5, 2009, 1:07 AM
Post #182 of 357 (4354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2007
Posts: 426

Quite the storm in here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2009, 1:12 AM
Post #183 of 357 (4350 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Lena, none of what I said was aimed at you. You seem to know what you are doing...and you have a good situation with people watching children at all times. It just seems like some people have zero common sense when it comes to kids and climbing. Or kids in general. But like I said in my one post...every situation and child is different.

I did not think you were aiming at me, but I was responding to you... You know your child better, so if she is not ready for the crag, she is not ready.

OTOH, I felt that my son was not ready for any sort of camping for a long time (forget climbing, I am not talking about climbing here, just family camping), so the first time he went camping with us he was almost 6yo, and in retrospect it was an overkill on my part. He was not ready as a toddler b/c he had no chance to ever get ready for it. My younger one was 18 months at the time she went camping for the first time, and she was just as ready for it as my older child was. Yet, if I had applied the same criteria to her and waited until she was 6 yo, or some other arbitrary cut-off number, we wouldn't have gone camping all these years, and they wouldn't have had a chance to have some really good times.


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 1:23 AM
Post #184 of 357 (4332 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
I actually wont bring her, she belongs to my parents and she was (not) trained while i was at college so she can't be trusted anywhere.

Well, I could fix that for ya. Cost ya a 12 pack of beer and three days of guided climbing in New England. Camhead, Climbsomething, and a few others can vouch for my ability to train a proper crag dog. Let me know. Cool

In reply to:
But neither could these children with the present supervision, clearly.

At the risk of repeating someone else here, "According to the OP."

In reply to:
and EXACTLY, The crag is for everyone.. which means I or anyone else shouldn't have to have a shitty time.. or have to move to a different crag because some parent's can't get their kids to stfu or make a complete clusterfuck of the base.

But neither are you guaranteed a good time, peace and quiet, or a clean environment. What makes your rights to have a crag without annoying kids any greater than the rights of a parent (or parents) to bring their kids outdoors for a day?

In reply to:
not sure how i'm being selfish saying that 1 set of parents shouldn't ruin a whole crag by their inattentiveness.

Because you're saying, essentially, "What these other people are doing is annoying to me. Make it stop, so I can have the day I want to have!"

I don't really like people in general. Chalk it up to too many years of being lied to, mistreated, and taken for granted. Hell, call me an old curmudgeonly bastard. I don't care.

The point is that when I want a peaceful day climbing, I don't go to a popular local crag (and we have plenty here in the Denver area.) I go where there are no people. If, forbid, I should decide to go to a popular local crag, I accept that there might... nay, WILL... be people there that will most probably annoy me.

And I damn sure wouldn't judge someone for bringing their kids outside for a day. We need more of that, and less parents plopping their kid in front of a TV with the PS2 or a DVD.

YMMV.

buy your own beer, i'll take you to Rumney for free, and skip the damn dog.. i'd rather go climbing. Ask Epock, Doc, WMD, Biner etc can vouch for my sport guiding ability.

for the record i don't have issues with kids at the crag. But if they are making a huge scene with no parental intervention to stop it and they are doing things that are unsafe then i'm not cool with it.

I agree they should be outside more.. but attended .. not just left to cry and hate it there.. i don't think that makes the outdoors very appealing. going out and being involved and having their parents show them stuff.. take them walking around. that would have encouraged the kids to want to come back.


bigevilgrape


Aug 5, 2009, 1:26 AM
Post #185 of 357 (4329 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
But screaming, running around like kids, throwing stones....

no, throwing stones is not ok. Throwing anything that you find "in nature" is not ok. If I see you pick something up off the ground and throw it (at a crag) I will rip you a new one. that is a huge safty issue. Lets say child is climbing up at Jimmy cliff picks up a baseball sized rock and chucks it tward the valley, over Wiamea and hits someone in the head. THIS IS NOT acceptable.

Running isn't a safe game to be playing at Rumney either. There isn't a ton of room at the bottoms of the cliffs and the drop off after the trail is steep. The crags are stacked on top of each other. The OP said the kid took a digger running around, well he's damn lucky he didn't fall off the back side of the little area where the tent is set up.

I don't understand how y ou can "agree with the safety issues" when you say running around and throwing rocks is OK for kids to do at a crag because both of these are huge safety issues, for the kids and the other climbers.

EDIT: This is only aplicable when you are at a climbing area, I don't care what you do elsewhere.


(This post was edited by bigevilgrape on Aug 5, 2009, 3:01 AM)


MikeSaint


Aug 5, 2009, 1:30 AM
Post #186 of 357 (4326 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2007
Posts: 426

Diapers at the crag!? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wait whats this?

When your baby shits the diaper you can just dump it in the woods because its biodegradable?


bennydh


Aug 5, 2009, 1:42 AM
Post #187 of 357 (4311 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 2, 2005
Posts: 368

Re: [MikeSaint] Diapers at the crag!? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sounds legit. Maybe if its in a hole 6 inches deep, away from drinking water... yadda yadda.

Go do some adventure climbing, that takes backpacking to get to.

Or get a poorly trained dog of a violent breed and start taking it to the crag, but neglect it like a whinny child when it doesn't play nice with the other children. Then post rant here after lawsuit.

Or tie a couple of whinning wanker kids together, show one how to belay the rest how to back up belay, and have yourself a good dynamic/soft catch for falls. Sounds cushy to me.


rockandlice


Aug 5, 2009, 1:52 AM
Post #188 of 357 (4297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [bennydh] Diapers at the crag!? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If a Baby falls off the top of a crag and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?


reno


Aug 5, 2009, 1:55 AM
Post #189 of 357 (4292 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
buy your own beer,

Yankee hospitality at it's finest.

In reply to:
i'll take you to Rumney for free, and skip the damn dog.. i'd rather go climbing. Ask Epock, Doc, WMD, Biner etc can vouch for my sport guiding ability.

"Sport guiding ability" = "Follow the bolts." Tongue

In reply to:
for the record i don't have issues with kids at the crag. But if they are making a huge scene with no parental intervention to stop it and they are doing things that are unsafe then i'm not cool with it.

Sounds like you have a problem with the adults/parents, not the kids.

Which is fine. I have a problem with most adults, too. Yet, as a non-parent, I don't feel I have the position to tell someone that their parenting sucks. I haven't been a parent, so I don't know what it's like. And, thus, won't presume to be able to tell someone "You're doing it wrong!"

Again... YMMV.


blueeyedclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 2:08 AM
Post #190 of 357 (4278 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
These kids were spastic, crying, danger to themselves with little to no reprimand.
According to the op. Are you really going to take someone's side who refers to children as little bastards?

In reply to:
there looks to have been no.. "teaching about nature, wilderness experience, outdoor adventure"
Once again, according to the op.

In reply to:
it sounds like it was we're going to climb, you sit there with out friend and we'll talk to you in a few hours.
see above.

In reply to:
Re: Wonderwoman. Tiff you know as well as i do that the scenario described is not the status quo for Rumney. I've seen far more clusterfucks at the gunks than i have at Rumney and i've been at Rumney like 200 times more than the gunks.

THe Gunks do indeed have clusterfucks, but they are usually centralized in a few locations, whereas any gym n00b can throw themselves at any route at Rumney without worrying too much about anything. Now, don't take this too much to heart. The one or two times Tiff and I go to Rumney a year, we have a blast, but to say it's not a zoo on the weekends is not Korect, sir!

JoshCool

Last 2 weekends i've been to Rumney it has not been a zoo and i've not had to wait in line for anything i wanted to get on. regardless of grade. I skip parking lot and meadows if they are busy in the AM or do 1-2 warm ups and move on. ask Jay, Matt, kate etc.. they were there. CF's are centralized at rumney too. parking lot.. meadows.. 5.8 crag.. use your feet and head and you can find an empty crag. Ever been to Pulse? awesome routes.. ghost town.

That's all well and good. But, RUmney aside, the op is an asshole. Period. Children 5 and under can hardly be blamed for their behavior. Parents should role-model, modify behavior, punish if appropriate and show unconditional love for their children. If this is not enough to entice these children to act appropriately then you are right, maybe they shouldn't be bringing them to the crag. Troll or not, the original post comes from someone with serious emotional and psychological problems and he needs to seek professional help.

Oh yeah, and Rumney sucks! Tongue


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 2:09 AM
Post #191 of 357 (4278 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
dingus wrote:
But screaming, running around like kids, throwing stones....

no, throwing stones is not ok. Throwing anything that you find "in nature" is not ok.

Evil humans, BOOOOO!



DMT


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 2:12 AM
Post #192 of 357 (4274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
I don't understand how y ou can "agree with the safety issues" when you say running around and throwing rocks is OK for kids to do at a crag because both of these are huge safety issues, for the kids and the other climbers.


I'm just not an all or nothing guy like you. I can envision kids at a cliff safely tossing some stones. I can see some kids at a cliff being kids and running around.

I can also see the opposite.

"How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?"

Cheers
DMT


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 2:15 AM
Post #193 of 357 (4269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [reno] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reno wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
buy your own beer,

Yankee hospitality at it's finest.

In reply to:
i'll take you to Rumney for free, and skip the damn dog.. i'd rather go climbing. Ask Epock, Doc, WMD, Biner etc can vouch for my sport guiding ability.

"Sport guiding ability" = "Follow the bolts." Tongue

In reply to:
for the record i don't have issues with kids at the crag. But if they are making a huge scene with no parental intervention to stop it and they are doing things that are unsafe then i'm not cool with it.

Sounds like you have a problem with the adults/parents, not the kids.

Which is fine. I have a problem with most adults, too. Yet, as a non-parent, I don't feel I have the position to tell someone that their parenting sucks. I haven't been a parent, so I don't know what it's like. And, thus, won't presume to be able to tell someone "You're doing it wrong!"

Again... YMMV.

yes follow the bolts.. but which lines suck and which don't.. which aren't even in the 8 year old book.. hmm can you get from Crag A to Crag C ? you can wander around or you can get high volume.

you're right.. the parents are the issue... kids don't know they are doing something wrong unless you tell them in a way that makes them understand that it's wrong. So if they cannot parent correctly in a way that is respectful to the others around them then they should not bring your children.

maybe i've just grown up not wanting to be "that guy" .. these folks clearly were "that guy" and i'd be embarrassed to be part of their group.


kriso9tails


Aug 5, 2009, 2:23 AM
Post #194 of 357 (4260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
I don't understand how y ou can "agree with the safety issues" when you say running around and throwing rocks is OK for kids to do at a crag because both of these are huge safety issues, for the kids and the other climbers.

In all fairness, most crags aren't stacked one on top of another like Rumney. All things in context.

In reply to:
Throwing anything that you find "in nature" is not ok.


Sorry, but most small turtles are just begging for it (beady-eyed, elitist, little bastards think they're so much better than me, hiding away in their shells).


Basta916


Aug 5, 2009, 2:37 AM
Post #195 of 357 (4239 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2007
Posts: 311

Re: [bennydh] Diapers at the crag!? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bennydh wrote:
dog of a violent breed .

WOW...you sure sound like you know all about dogs.
Maybe you need to be trained before you make stupid statements like that.

And since there are violent dog breeds, can you tell us what human breeds you would consider violent??????


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 2:40 AM
Post #196 of 357 (4235 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bigevilgrape wrote:
dingus wrote:
But screaming, running around like kids, throwing stones....

no, throwing stones is not ok. Throwing anything that you find "in nature" is not ok. If I see you pick something up off the ground and throw it (at a crag) I will rip you a new one. that is a huge safty issue. Lets say child is climbing up at Jimmy cliff picks up a baseball sized rock and chucks it tward the valley, over Wiamea and hits someone in the head. THIS IS NOT acceptable.

Running isn't a safe game to be playing at Rumney either. There isn't a ton of room at the bottoms of the cliffs and the drop off after the trail is steep. The crags are stacked on top of each other. The OP said the kid took a digger running around, well he's damn lucky he didn't fall off the back side of the little area where the tent is set up.

I don't understand how y ou can "agree with the safety issues" when you say running around and throwing rocks is OK for kids to do at a crag because both of these are huge safety issues, for the kids and the other climbers.

One of the dumbest things I've ever seen in print.


bigevilgrape


Aug 5, 2009, 2:43 AM
Post #197 of 357 (4227 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ok then I will swing over to your local crag and start winging crap I find on the ground at your head while you climb. I know "in nature" sounds gay but things you find on the ground outside are not for throwing, toys like balls and frisbees are for throwing.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 2:50 AM
Post #198 of 357 (4207 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ron Howard won America's heart by throwing something he found in nature(skipping a stone across the lake as Opie Taylor in Mayberry, RFD).


bigevilgrape


Aug 5, 2009, 2:51 AM
Post #199 of 357 (4207 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thats at a beach, not at a crag. Throwing rocks at a crag is not ok. 3 toddlers don't have the capacity to tell when it is safe to throw rocks, so you shouldn't let them. You don't know the topography at rumney or you would agree with me. (and my argument has always been that at RUMNEY on a WEEKEND is not an apropriate place to bring kids who arn't used to/don't know how to act at a crag, not that you shouldn't bring kids climbing)


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 2:51 AM
Post #200 of 357 (4207 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Seems to me that rocks are the original throwing items, long before balls.

Sorry, I'm trying not to be so judgmental of other people. I have a job with a pretty repressive company and I don't think I'd like the whole country to go that way. I prefer that we retain the freedom to indulge our individual judgment to some extent.

Throw rocks at my head, well, no I don't think that's a good idea and I will probably do my best to beat you to death with a stick if you do. Little kid throwing rocks around and not hurting anyone, hey, big deal. If they need redirection, I give it to them regardless of their parents being present or not. You're free to make appropriate on the spot input, it's a lot more effective than running off at the finger tips on the internet.


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 2:54 AM
Post #201 of 357 (8170 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, I know what you are saying. My girl loves hiking, but she is sort of afraid of the tent :-/ And she is afraid of heights...she even wigs out when I climb...I think maybe if I take her more often, she will feel better? Either that or she needs to get to an age where she can understand what I'm saying more easily.


bigevilgrape


Aug 5, 2009, 2:55 AM
Post #202 of 357 (8167 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

When you've had stupid teen agers chuck beer bottles off the top of a cliff at you, and parents who let their kids throw rocks off the top of the cliff at you you think about things differently.

And I"m not saying you can't throw rocks ever just not at the crag.


(This post was edited by bigevilgrape on Aug 6, 2009, 1:33 AM)


bigevilgrape


Aug 5, 2009, 2:58 AM
Post #203 of 357 (8159 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

once again he wasn't at a crag.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:04 AM
Post #204 of 357 (8156 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bigevilgrape] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Fair enough. But context is important.


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:09 AM
Post #205 of 357 (8148 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
Fair enough. But context is important.

the thread is about kids at a crag.. what other context do you need? Many.. if not most of the cliff bases at rumney.. if things are thrown downward.. will either land on an active trail or lower cliff.

happiegrrrl wrote:
Ron Howard won America's heart by throwing something he found in nature(skipping a stone across the lake as Opie Taylor in Mayberry, RFD).

i'd go drop a rock onto your head at your precious Gunks for saying something so stupid.. really.. throwing a rock into a pond is like throwing rocks at the crag eh? stfu... and your little yappy dog too.


wonderwoman


Aug 5, 2009, 3:14 AM
Post #206 of 357 (8142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
stfu... and your little yappy dog too.

I have to say that Teddie is one of the most well behaved and sweetest crag dogs that I have ever met. Plus, I thought we were talking about kids!


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:25 AM
Post #207 of 357 (8133 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
stfu... and your little yappy dog too.

I have to say that Teddie is one of the most well behaved and sweetest crag dogs that I have ever met. Plus, I thought we were talking about kids!

we're also talking about throwing rocks at the crag.. not into a freaking lake.. Harpie can't seem to follow that..


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:29 AM
Post #208 of 357 (8131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc is really wound tightly...sheeesh....

Hey, Jagoff - Has it ever occurred to you that not everything I write is meant to be taken literally?

One has to wonder why you get so bent out of shape over my posts, to the point you write crap about harming my dog.

Annnnnd....just to piss.you.off.......Teddy!



Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:31 AM
Post #209 of 357 (8129 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Teddy has the rangers in his pocket - better watch who you be threatening!



Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:33 AM
Post #210 of 357 (8126 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Teddy Bundled in a Bag!



(This post was edited by happiegrrrl on Aug 5, 2009, 3:37 AM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:34 AM
Post #211 of 357 (8125 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Teddy has a Preserve Pass - Note: Hiking, Biking and Climbing!



(This post was edited by happiegrrrl on Aug 5, 2009, 3:38 AM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:36 AM
Post #212 of 357 (8124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Teddy digging in the dirt!



(This post was edited by happiegrrrl on Aug 5, 2009, 3:38 AM)


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:37 AM
Post #213 of 357 (8121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
jakedatc is really wound tightly...sheeesh....

Hey, Jagoff - Has it ever occurred to you that not everything I write is meant to be taken literally?

One has to wonder why you get so bent out of shape over my posts, to the point you write crap about harming my dog.

Annnnnd....just to piss.you.off.......Teddy!
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v408/happiegrrrl/Teddy%20Pics/TeddyDeepinThought.jpg[/IMG]

most of the time i have no idea wtf you are saying.. trying to say.. imagining that you think is funny to say.

and i didnt say a damn thing about hurting your dog.. your dream world must be a strange place.

and this thread isnt about your fucking dog so quit making off topic posts..


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:42 AM
Post #214 of 357 (8112 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
...
and i didnt say a damn thing about hurting your dog.. your dream world must be a strange place.

and this thread isnt about your fucking dog so quit making off topic posts..


what did you mean to infer, then, with a post that included
In reply to:
...i'd go drop a rock onto your head at your precious Gunks for saying something so stupid...


You are wound so tight you aren't even cognizant as to what you write, are you?


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 3:42 AM
Post #215 of 357 (8110 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

She is one specia' carrot. But that is why I like her.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:44 AM
Post #216 of 357 (8101 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Oh...wait.... I see it was ME you intend to harm.... well now, that makes it all a little more....creepy.

Got issues?


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:45 AM
Post #217 of 357 (8094 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
...
and i didnt say a damn thing about hurting your dog.. your dream world must be a strange place.

and this thread isnt about your fucking dog so quit making off topic posts..


what did you mean to infer, then, with a post that included
In reply to:
...i'd go drop a rock onto your head at your precious Gunks for saying something so stupid...


You are wound so tight you aren't even cognizant as to what you write, are you?

YOUR HEAD you dumbass..(and not literally jeebus) unless you are the dog.. i dunno.. you've said stranger things! CrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazy


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:49 AM
Post #218 of 357 (8086 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
Fair enough. But context is important.

the thread is about kids at a crag.. what other context do you need? Many.. if not most of the cliff bases at rumney.. if things are thrown downward.. will either land on an active trail or lower cliff.

Not all crags are equal. I don't like rules, especially ones made by other people.


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:51 AM
Post #219 of 357 (8081 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
Fair enough. But context is important.

the thread is about kids at a crag.. what other context do you need? Many.. if not most of the cliff bases at rumney.. if things are thrown downward.. will either land on an active trail or lower cliff.

Not all crags are equal. I don't like rules, especially ones made by other people.

Ok.. this thread is about a particular crag. If you throw rocks there.. expect people to be pissed off at you.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:53 AM
Post #220 of 357 (8076 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OMG, IT'S THE END!!!


Cool


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 3:54 AM
Post #221 of 357 (8074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I seriously can't believe there is an argument about throwing rocks at a crag, ANY crag. We don't do it. No throwing rocks girls and boys. How many have been killed or injured by rock trundling? Case closed. Thank you.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:56 AM
Post #222 of 357 (8060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I seriously can't believe there is an argument about throwing rocks at a crag, ANY crag. We don't do it. No throwing rocks girls and boys. How many have been killed or injured by rock trundling? Case closed. Thank you.

FAIL.


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 3:58 AM
Post #223 of 357 (8056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dude. You. Are like every other nutso soccer dad/mom in my neighborhood. CRAZY. But instead, you are besotting the name of "climber" with your insanity. With no hope of recovery. Good luck with that.


onceahardman


Aug 5, 2009, 3:59 AM
Post #224 of 357 (8050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Leave your damn kids at home

No. Make me.


bennydh


Aug 5, 2009, 4:10 AM
Post #225 of 357 (8018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 2, 2005
Posts: 368

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
karmiclimber wrote:
I seriously can't believe there is an argument about throwing rocks at a crag, ANY crag. We don't do it. No throwing rocks girls and boys. How many have been killed or injured by rock trundling? Case closed. Thank you.

FAIL.

Agreed Failure. Thats' not an argument to start when we need to get this thread back on track...

Now back to the original topic; Leave your damn dogs at home with rock throwing children.


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 4:14 AM
Post #226 of 357 (4297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [bennydh] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This place is like Alice in Wonderland. I did not start that argument. I was merely expressing my disbelief that said argument was taking place.
Agree dogs and rock throwing children at home. And crazy climber dads also. 'Cept the hot, gnarly ones. They can bring their rock throwing children.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 4:25 AM
Post #227 of 357 (4276 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I seriously can't believe there is an argument about throwing rocks at a crag, ANY crag. We don't do it. No throwing rocks girls and boys. How many have been killed or injured by rock trundling? Case closed. Thank you.

No one's arguing about anything. We're just doin the dozens internet style, now stfu.

DMT


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 4:25 AM
Post #228 of 357 (4275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Dude. You. Are like every other nutso soccer dad/mom in my neighborhood. CRAZY. But instead, you are besotting the name of "climber" with your insanity. With no hope of recovery. Good luck with that.

Really, I'm pretty much okay with my version of crazy. Thanks.


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 4:27 AM
Post #229 of 357 (4272 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ooooh. Are we not a hot climber dad? :-/

Next?


dr_feelgood


Aug 5, 2009, 4:28 AM
Post #230 of 357 (4268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I seriously can't believe there is an argument about throwing rocks at a crag, ANY crag. We don't do it. No throwing rocks girls and boys. How many have been killed or injured by rock trundling? Case closed. Thank you.

Wasn't there a guide killed in the wind river range by some dude hucking a rock over the edge?


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 4:29 AM
Post #231 of 357 (4263 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Clearly. Its really more your children I'm worried about. I get the whole fuck the man, blah blah, rules are for breaking 12 year old boy bs you are spewing...but some rules are grounded in REALITY.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 4:30 AM
Post #232 of 357 (4256 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Ooooh. Are we not a hot climber dad? :-/

Next?

(sigh)

I'm so misunderstood.

Cuddles!

DMT


airdo


Aug 5, 2009, 4:32 AM
Post #233 of 357 (4250 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 28, 2004
Posts: 39

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011,
Sounds like you don't have children and I suggest you keep it that way.


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 4:33 AM
Post #234 of 357 (4247 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Your mom cuddles.


technogeekery


Aug 5, 2009, 10:11 AM
Post #235 of 357 (4212 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2009
Posts: 146

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Laugh this is one of the best cases of thread-degeneration I've seen for a long time...

I'm teaching my kids to throw rocks at crag dogs, once they get their eye in I'm taking them climbing.


hyhuu


Aug 5, 2009, 11:15 AM
Post #236 of 357 (4188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [technogeekery] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What about climbers who throw tantrum, shoes or helmets at the crag? I've seen a few before. Somehow they seemed to believe the behaviors could compensate for their lack of skills.


ladyscarlett


Aug 5, 2009, 11:33 AM
Post #237 of 357 (4185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 376

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

All the rest of th content in the thread aside...

I would REALLY love to be there when you say this to a child or grandchild of yours who tells you he/she has decided not to have children....

And yes, breeders always win, but by that time, I'll be dead, and I won't care who wins or looses. Heh.

crazy post.

ls


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 12:02 PM
Post #238 of 357 (4178 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Your mom cuddles.

Sure thing pickle.

DMT


bobbj22


Aug 5, 2009, 1:06 PM
Post #239 of 357 (4154 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Seems to me that rocks are the original throwing items, long before balls.

Correct and made for an early form of execution.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 1:22 PM
Post #240 of 357 (4137 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Clearly. Its really more your children I'm worried about. I get the whole fuck the man, blah blah, rules are for breaking 12 year old boy bs you are spewing...but some rules are grounded in REALITY.

Like always use a cordellette on three pieces of pro?


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2009, 1:29 PM
Post #241 of 357 (4126 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Yeah, I know what you are saying. My girl loves hiking, but she is sort of afraid of the tent :-/ And she is afraid of heights...she even wigs out when I climb...I think maybe if I take her more often, she will feel better? Either that or she needs to get to an age where she can understand what I'm saying more easily.

Both waiting until she is older, and taking her now more often, is likely to produce the same result in the end... so it is up to you, really.

My daughter went through a phase when she was freaking out when I climbed, even though she was in her Dad's arms at the time. I think it had something to do with separation enxiety-- "oh, no, mom is going somewhere where I can't possibly get to her!!!!"--that sort of thing. We kept reassuring her that everything was O.K., that mom would be back down shortly, and the phase did not last long.


snowboardercolo


Aug 5, 2009, 1:30 PM
Post #242 of 357 (4124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 87

Re: [bill413] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hmmm,
Cute kids with HOT moms. Has anyone else noticed how HOT they look? I vote for the MOMS!
You come off as a unused tool that craves attention. Wow "Sending some sick 5.9s?" Is there such a thing? What a NOOB!


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 1:40 PM
Post #243 of 357 (4114 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [snowboardercolo] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

snowboardercolo wrote:
Hmmm,
Cute kids with HOT moms. Has anyone else noticed how HOT they look? I vote for the MOMS!
You come off as a unused tool that craves attention. Wow "Sending some sick 5.9s?" Is there such a thing? What a NOOB!

says the guy who leads 5.8 Laugh noob..


Partner camhead


Aug 5, 2009, 2:11 PM
Post #244 of 357 (4073 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
snowboardercolo wrote:
Hmmm,
Cute kids with HOT moms. Has anyone else noticed how HOT they look? I vote for the MOMS!
You come off as a unused tool that craves attention. Wow "Sending some sick 5.9s?" Is there such a thing? What a NOOB!

says the guy who leads 5.8 Laugh noob..

he just doesn't update his ascent list. he's too busy crushing 5.14.


Partner j_ung


Aug 5, 2009, 2:12 PM
Post #245 of 357 (4070 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was sitting in Pies and Pints the other night, when a baby erupted into fits of very loud crying. My gawd, that kid had lungs. However, after about 20 seconds, when it became obvious that she wasn't going to stop anytime soon, the mother scooped her up and walked outside. Five minutes later she strolled back in with a calm, cooing baby in her arms.

I certainly respected both the woman's parenting ability and her consideration for other diners. She has every right to bring her baby into the restaurant. We had a right to peaceful dining. She split the difference between the two and everybody, including the baby, was happy.

IMO, the same goes at crags. A sweeping generalizatiion that small children should or should not be "allowed" is ridiculous. Parents have every right (in every legal sense of the word "right") to bring children to crags, however, other climbers also have a right to expect those children to be under control. Rights come with responsibilities and parents have the absolute responsibility to either control their childrens' behavior or take them someplace else. Not to do so is selfish, dangerous and arguably criminal in a worst-case scenario.

Minus the dangerous and criminal part, the same goes for restaurants, movies... you name it.


rockandlice


Aug 5, 2009, 2:20 PM
Post #246 of 357 (4056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What's wrong with you Jay!? That post was totally on topic and uncalled for! Wink


Partner j_ung


Aug 5, 2009, 2:24 PM
Post #247 of 357 (4047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [ladyscarlett] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

And creating a potentially unsafe environment for other climbers is what you call true success? Parenting FAIL. Tongue

This is the exact type of of uncompromising inconsiderate crap that, pardon the pun, breeds conflict in these situations. It's the opposite side of the ridiculous coin the OP flipped ten pages back.

You know I luvs ya, R (friend way), but go "raise" yourself.


Partner j_ung


Aug 5, 2009, 2:25 PM
Post #248 of 357 (4043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [rockandlice] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockandlice wrote:
What's wrong with you Jay!? That post was totally on topic and uncalled for! Wink

My bad. Dogz rool!


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 2:30 PM
Post #249 of 357 (4028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
I was sitting in Pies and Pints the other night, when a baby erupted into fits of very loud crying. My gawd, that kid had lungs. However, after about 20 seconds, when it became obvious that she wasn't going to stop anytime soon, the mother scooped her up and walked outside. Five minutes later she strolled back in with a calm, cooing baby in her arms.

I certainly respected both the woman's parenting ability and her consideration for other diners. She has every right to bring her baby into the restaurant. We had a right to peaceful dining. She split the difference between the two and everybody, including the baby, was happy.

IMO, the same goes at crags. A sweeping generalizatiion that small children should or should not be "allowed" is ridiculous. Parents have every right (in every legal sense of the word "right") to bring children to crags, however, other climbers also have a right to expect those children to be under control. Rights come with responsibilities and parents have the absolute responsibility to either control their childrens' behavior or take them someplace else. Not to do so is selfish, dangerous and arguably criminal in a worst-case scenario.

Minus the dangerous and criminal part, the same goes for restaurants, movies... you name it.

Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT


Partner j_ung


Aug 5, 2009, 2:42 PM
Post #250 of 357 (4012 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 2:54 PM
Post #251 of 357 (3603 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)

No one's opinion is any more, or less, valid than any others.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 2:57 PM
Post #252 of 357 (3596 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
Clearly. Its really more your children I'm worried about. I get the whole fuck the man, blah blah, rules are for breaking 12 year old boy bs you are spewing...but some rules are grounded in REALITY.

And some are grounded in a risk averse, lack of individual responsibility attitude.

Certainly, at most crags, throwing rocks produces no effect on other people. Throwing rocks at some places at some crags is probably to be avoided. Good sense, not necessarily common sense, should be used to determine which case is at hand, not blanket rules.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 3:11 PM
Post #253 of 357 (3579 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)

All opinions are valid. Its just some are more valid than others. I shouldn't have to tell YOU that haha.

DMT


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 3:11 PM
Post #254 of 357 (3575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
j_ung wrote:
dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)

No one's opinion is any more, or less, valid than any others.

That's PC crap!

DMT


karmiclimber


Aug 5, 2009, 3:13 PM
Post #255 of 357 (3569 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm not provoked by your attempted provocation. Throwing rocks at the crag is unethical. It is unspoken climber law to not throw rocks. Same as...don't step on the rope, don't foist your beta on climbers who don't ask for it, pee downhill, off trail, don't set up topropes on every climb in sight and not pull your ropes if other climbers come into the area. You CAN do it...but you will be regarded as a shithead if you do.


reno


Aug 5, 2009, 3:17 PM
Post #256 of 357 (3560 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
j_ung wrote:
dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)

All opinions are valid. Its just some are more valid than others.




(This post was edited by reno on Aug 5, 2009, 3:17 PM)
Attachments: Animal farm.jpg (33.1 KB)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 5, 2009, 3:18 PM
Post #257 of 357 (3557 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I’m a craptastic parent who’s kids are trying to make the FBI watch list before they hit 10 yrs old. Not really, I just didn’t want to start another one of the “my kids are good” subject (even though they are).

I wanted to take Dingus’ point and go one further…

Those moms were demonstrating some awesome parenting. Who cares if they annoy anyone else? Pull that stick out of your ass and relax. Let ‘em scream. Let them cry. Let them throw all the rocks they want. Oohhhh. They might ruin your experience. So? Grow a bigger set of ear plugs. Don’t worry about those kids getting hurt. Unless you are some tightly wound numnuts member of a rescue squad, let ‘em get hurt. Let them throw that rock at each other. Who cares?

The OP troll was projecting his expectations of how a parent should act onto others. Probably even projecting how his parents treated him and called that “right” and now wants everyone else should behave in that manner. Get over it. If that had been a bunch of 21 year olds with beer, screamin’, yellin’, throwin rocks at each other and passing beer back and forth while their hottie girlfriends climbed, the OP would have strolled over to see what all the fun was about. The OP shoulda done the same with the kids. Who know, he might have gotten cookies and a bj.

Same with a restaurant: Let the kids scream, let them wander all over. If you also got out of your tightly would “I must be repressed” mindset you would see that life is much better if you look to join the fun instead of hearing the noise.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 3:19 PM
Post #258 of 357 (3555 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think the "rock throwing" got a little out of hand...maybe it's a slow news day here on rc.

Nobody in their right mind thinks it's okay to be throwing rocks where the chance to hit someone from above (or pelt them on the side from a short distance) is okay.

The kids in this instance are like 4 years old! Do you think any rock they have picked up is:
- bigger than a quarter?
- able to be put a distance greater than 3 feet?
- that if the kids were throwing that AT a human, or on the edge of a cliff, a climber mom wouldn't be on it?

The thing is, with kids(from what I understand) - you can't sweat the small stuff. If you had to tell a kid "no" for every possible transgression they were making throughout a day, you might as well just tape a loop of "No's!" and let it play continuously.

The "rocks are okay!" posts are generally made either in jest or else with a perspective in mind(ie; dude trundles football size rock off top of cliff in Wind River - BAD, 3 year old overhands a chunk of dirt that has a few pebbles in it 3 feet(tops) and shin level - KID who will be a kid.

For something funny, check out this illustrated film from Jeremy Collins/Timmy O'Neill "A Brief Biased History of Big Wall Climbing" Link: http://www.timmyoneill.com/video/HistBWclimb.html


On an aside - OP has logged in and not posted to his little masterpiece since his last one. Guess he's just sitting back and laughing at the train wreck. Or sobered up and realized what an ass he came off as. Or is busily pecking away at the Mother Of ALL Replies.... Or something


budman


Aug 5, 2009, 3:29 PM
Post #259 of 357 (3547 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 170

Re: [jakedatc] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

OH MY! Anger issues.


snowboardercolo


Aug 5, 2009, 3:39 PM
Post #260 of 357 (3536 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 87

Re: [camhead] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Actually a girl in SUV took me out of climbing for a year; T boned at 55. So just getting back into the 10s.

The NOOB comment stands, he says he is rated on 11s but sending 9s WTF? What 11 climber do you know wants to be around 9s unless he is breaking in a new belayer?
He is a tool Laugh


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post #261 of 357 (3535 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
j_ung wrote:
dingus wrote:
Tell you what - when the screamers STFU and the spraylords stfu and the betamasters stuf then they've a case against loud children.

But not until then.

Scream on kids. Those angry young men don't own the crag.

DMT

I'm none of the above, therefore my opinion is valid (?)

No one's opinion is any more, or less, valid than any others.

That's PC crap!

DMT

Well, I suppose your opinion is worth more the more people you agree with just because majority rules (usually). But in this venue, we're all equally worthless.


shockabuku


Aug 5, 2009, 3:41 PM
Post #262 of 357 (3530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I'm not provoked by your attempted provocation. Throwing rocks at the crag is unethical. It is unspoken climber law to not throw rocks. Same as...don't step on the rope, don't foist your beta on climbers who don't ask for it, pee downhill, off trail, don't set up topropes on every climb in sight and not pull your ropes if other climbers come into the area. You CAN do it...but you will be regarded as a shithead if you do.

Apparently we hold with different ethics.


dingus


Aug 5, 2009, 3:42 PM
Post #263 of 357 (3525 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [shockabuku] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No. Agreement is irrevevant. Its all about influence and power.

Example: my opinion is not equivalent to the opinion of the CEO of my company.

My opinion on rc.com is not equivalent to jungs.

These are simple facts.

I'm not objecting to them either. Its just the nature of opinion.

DMT


jakedatc


Aug 5, 2009, 3:47 PM
Post #264 of 357 (3514 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
The kids in this instance are like 4 years old! Do you think any rock they have picked up is:
- bigger than a quarter?
- able to be put a distance greater than 3 feet?
- that if the kids were throwing that AT a human, or on the edge of a cliff, a climber mom wouldn't be on it?

The thing is, with kids(from what I understand) - you can't sweat the small stuff. If you had to tell a kid "no" for every possible transgression they were making throughout a day, you might as well just tape a loop of "No's!" and let it play continuously.

OR if you tell them NO in a way that they understand you actually mean it they won't repeat it.

Clearly your experience with children is limited. kids try and can lift things much bigger than you think. I've seen kids similar sized to the ones in that picture carrying rocks the size of a large nalgene bottle over their head. I've seen similar rocks that size being nudged off the trail above where that picture was taken and ended up 2-300 yards down hill. It doesn't always take throwing to get things moving at a dangerous speed.

The parents let their kid fall 5 feet down a rocky trail.. do you think they are really skilled enough to prevent anything? highly unlikely. (btw the trail leading up to that flat area that it seems likely the kid fell is like a staircase made of rocks.. )


Partner camhead


Aug 5, 2009, 3:59 PM
Post #265 of 357 (3485 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:


On an aside - OP has logged in and not posted to his little masterpiece since his last one. Guess he's just sitting back and laughing at the train wreck. Or sobered up and realized what an ass he came off as. Or is busily pecking away at the Mother Of ALL Replies.... Or something

You seem rather obsessed on the OP being a troll... IT'S YOU, ISN'T IT??!!!!

BANZ HAPPIEGRILL NOOOW!


wjca


Aug 5, 2009, 4:31 PM
Post #266 of 357 (3469 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:


The OP troll was projecting his expectations of how a parent should act onto others. Probably even projecting how his parents treated him and called that “right” and now wants everyone else should behave in that manner. Get over it. If that had been a bunch of 21 year olds with beer, screamin’, yellin’, throwin rocks at each other and passing beer back and forth while their hottie girlfriends climbed, the OP would have strolled over to see what all the fun was about. The OP shoulda done the same with the kids. Who know, he might have gotten cookies and a bj.


Finishing a good day at your local crag with a cookie and a blowjob from a hot MILF...very much worth putting up with a couple of kids chucking some rocks. Keep your mind and eyes open for opportunities like these. You know the whole door being shut and a window being opened thing.


HeatAttack


Aug 5, 2009, 4:34 PM
Post #267 of 357 (3465 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 28, 2009
Posts: 2

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

This is really a mute discussion anyway.. Now that the government has decided that the carbon foot print of a new child over its life time has to much of an impact on the environment. So we wont be allowed to have children anymore. Just wait 5-10 years for the current kids to grow up and shabamo problem solved.


wonderwoman


Aug 5, 2009, 4:47 PM
Post #268 of 357 (3452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [HeatAttack] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

HeatAttack wrote:
This is really a mute discussion anyway..

Just because we're conversing over the internet, doesn't mean we're mute!


kriso9tails


Aug 5, 2009, 5:13 PM
Post #269 of 357 (3426 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
HeatAttack wrote:
This is really a mute discussion anyway..

Just because we're conversing over the internet, doesn't mean we're mute!

I'd certainly hope not. Someone has to speak up against our shabamo problem! Wait, wtf? Shabamo problem?


spanishbombs


Aug 5, 2009, 5:16 PM
Post #270 of 357 (3421 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2009
Posts: 13

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That said, I fear that some of the points are falling on deft ears.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 5, 2009, 5:32 PM
Post #271 of 357 (3405 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [spanishbombs] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, hopefully those ears are deft enough to avoid any rocks that might be thrown their way by a delinquent in the making 3 year old!


bobbj22


Aug 5, 2009, 5:44 PM
Post #272 of 357 (3401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Next time bring static rope and tie the kids to a tree so they can't test gravity on the trail...and maybe some tape for the screaming. Better yet, bring an airhorn and honk your way to silence. If they don't leave, at least you won't be able to hear them. Sly


JasonsDrivingForce


Aug 5, 2009, 8:19 PM
Post #273 of 357 (3353 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2009
Posts: 687

Re: [subantz] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

subantz wrote:
Swearing does make you look kools. I dont like or dislike kids, but would rather not be around them climbing. Simply because swear sometimes, Ok alot, and the last thing I want to hear is," HEY watch your mouth there are kids here." Like I give a shit. I usually tell parents in this case. I am not going to watch what I say I am not in court or church. Like you would find me in church anyways. They usually pack up. If the kids are a real pain just swear like you have torrets. If the parents yell at you Yell back. Show those little fuckers that you have a freedom of speech and you intend on exercising your right. This thould help fuel your fireAngelic

What is crazy is that there are still some states that have laws against swearing in front of women and children.

The other day a guy was spewing out curse words because he couldn’t make the second hold on the auto belay at the gym. I turned to my 5 year old and said don’t repeat a single f@cking word that idiot f@cking @sshole is saying. (in jest of course)Wink

I simply just walked my son over to another section of the gym. Problem solved.


JasonsDrivingForce


Aug 5, 2009, 8:44 PM
Post #274 of 357 (3337 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2009
Posts: 687

Re: [karmiclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

karmiclimber wrote:
I totally agree. As a single mom of a 3 1/2 year old, I would not dream of taking my child on a climbing trip. To the gym? Yes. On a camping trip? Yes. Hiking? Yup.
I would not take her on a climbing trip (yet) because its not the place for a toddler, for numerous reasons:
1. I can't keep an eye on her and concentrate on climbing/belaying...both of those things would need my undivided attention.
2. What if something happens to me or my partner and one of us is injured?
3. Snakes, poison ivy, crag dogs, edges of cliffs...etc
4. What if she starts harassing other climbers who are trying to belay or climb?
Honestly, the whole thing sounds like a mess to me. But when she is older and I do take her, you damn well better believe she will not be running around, screaming and acting all crazy like.

At what age do you think it is appropriate to take the kids climbing or camping? 3.5 seems young to me as well. However, once they are in kindergarten I think they learn to respect authority more.


kriso9tails


Aug 5, 2009, 9:25 PM
Post #275 of 357 (3315 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [JasonsDrivingForce] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JasonsDrivingForce wrote:
At what age do you think it is appropriate to take the kids climbing or camping? 3.5 seems young to me as well. However, once they are in kindergarten I think they learn to respect authority more.

i) Doesn't her post say that she would take her child on a camping trip?

ii) I thought I'd save her some time since she seems like cool people (and I already asked that, but her answer is now buried in the middle of the thread):

karmiclimber wrote:
I don't have an age in mind. I'm thinking six or seven...but I'll be watching her for the maturity that would be necessary for a climbing trip. Every child is different...some are ready sooner, some later. I will probably be asking my doctor also...I'm thinking in terms of, if the worst happens (she gets bitten by a copperhead and there is a 30 minute hike out...) will she be able to tolerate it like an adult. Could she get hurt/bitten by a snake, etc, playing outside? Well, yes, but its far more unlikely and the hospital is a couple minutes ride in the car down the road. To me, its using common sense as a parent. That said, I don't judge...other people are in different situations and their children are different. To me, parenting comes first, because it was a decision of responsibility that I made. Climbing has to come second...that doesn't mean I don't want to expose my daughter to climbing...which is why I take her to the gym. I might take her to a place like the Columns in Eugene Oregon (drive up crag, zero approach, easy access to hospital), but other than that, no. My own thoughts as a parent.


JasonsDrivingForce


Aug 5, 2009, 9:49 PM
Post #276 of 357 (4238 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2009
Posts: 687

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kriso9tails wrote:

i) Doesn't her post say that she would take her child on a camping trip?

ii) I thought I'd save her some time since she seems like cool people (and I already asked that, but her answer is now buried in the middle of the thread):

karmiclimber wrote:
I don't have an age in mind. I'm thinking six or seven...but I'll be watching her for the maturity that would be necessary for a climbing trip. Every child is different...some are ready sooner, some later. I will probably be asking my doctor also...I'm thinking in terms of, if the worst happens (she gets bitten by a copperhead and there is a 30 minute hike out...) will she be able to tolerate it like an adult. Could she get hurt/bitten by a snake, etc, playing outside? Well, yes, but its far more unlikely and the hospital is a couple minutes ride in the car down the road. To me, its using common sense as a parent. That said, I don't judge...other people are in different situations and their children are different. To me, parenting comes first, because it was a decision of responsibility that I made. Climbing has to come second...that doesn't mean I don't want to expose my daughter to climbing...which is why I take her to the gym. I might take her to a place like the Columns in Eugene Oregon (drive up crag, zero approach, easy access to hospital), but other than that, no. My own thoughts as a parent.

Thanks I didn’t see that post. She had some good thoughts on it though.

I saw that she would already take her 3.5 year old camping. I was wondering what the youngest age she would take a child camping was.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 5, 2009, 10:03 PM
Post #277 of 357 (4220 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [JasonsDrivingForce] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JasonsDrivingForce wrote:
kriso9tails wrote:

i) Doesn't her post say that she would take her child on a camping trip?

ii) I thought I'd save her some time since she seems like cool people (and I already asked that, but her answer is now buried in the middle of the thread):

karmiclimber wrote:
I don't have an age in mind. I'm thinking six or seven...but I'll be watching her for the maturity that would be necessary for a climbing trip. Every child is different...some are ready sooner, some later. I will probably be asking my doctor also...I'm thinking in terms of, if the worst happens (she gets bitten by a copperhead and there is a 30 minute hike out...) will she be able to tolerate it like an adult. Could she get hurt/bitten by a snake, etc, playing outside? Well, yes, but its far more unlikely and the hospital is a couple minutes ride in the car down the road. To me, its using common sense as a parent. That said, I don't judge...other people are in different situations and their children are different. To me, parenting comes first, because it was a decision of responsibility that I made. Climbing has to come second...that doesn't mean I don't want to expose my daughter to climbing...which is why I take her to the gym. I might take her to a place like the Columns in Eugene Oregon (drive up crag, zero approach, easy access to hospital), but other than that, no. My own thoughts as a parent.

Thanks I didn’t see that post. She had some good thoughts on it though.

I saw that she would already take her 3.5 year old camping. I was wondering what the youngest age she would take a child camping was.

Can't answer for others, but I would say "as soon as the mom is physically recovered from the pregnancy". In practical tearms 2 is the minimum for the first. The second and on are as soon as mom can go.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 6, 2009, 12:46 AM
Post #278 of 357 (4191 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arlene Blum was such a woman.

Read her autobiography, and she wrote about the shit she got all along the mountain hut system in Europe every night when she pulled in with her brand new baby in the rucksack!


bigevilgrape


Aug 6, 2009, 1:27 AM
Post #279 of 357 (4172 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2001
Posts: 922

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've seen 3 year olds roll a rock the size of a football down the side of a hill. And pick up rocks the size of softballs to throw (parental unit stoped them before they got very farThe strength weight ratio of a child is amazing and what makes them such good climbers. And they have a hard them understanding why you can throw rocks in one place but not another, the best think I've found is to have throwing toys for throwing and rocks for staying on the ground.

You don't step on ropes, you don't walk between a belayer and the wall, and you don't throw rocks at a wall. People are too bent out of shape trying to say how kids will be kids and how their child is so mcuh better. If I started a thread saying I let my kid trow rocks whenever we go climbing you would all be jumping down my throat.


climberguy2011


Aug 6, 2009, 1:58 AM
Post #280 of 357 (4160 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
I think the "rock throwing" got a little out of hand...maybe it's a slow news day here on rc.

Nobody in their right mind thinks it's okay to be throwing rocks where the chance to hit someone from above (or pelt them on the side from a short distance) is okay.

The kids in this instance are like 4 years old! Do you think any rock they have picked up is:
- bigger than a quarter?
- able to be put a distance greater than 3 feet?
- that if the kids were throwing that AT a human, or on the edge of a cliff, a climber mom wouldn't be on it?

The thing is, with kids(from what I understand) - you can't sweat the small stuff. If you had to tell a kid "no" for every possible transgression they were making throughout a day, you might as well just tape a loop of "No's!" and let it play continuously.

The "rocks are okay!" posts are generally made either in jest or else with a perspective in mind(ie; dude trundles football size rock off top of cliff in Wind River - BAD, 3 year old overhands a chunk of dirt that has a few pebbles in it 3 feet(tops) and shin level - KID who will be a kid.

For something funny, check out this illustrated film from Jeremy Collins/Timmy O'Neill "A Brief Biased History of Big Wall Climbing" Link: http://www.timmyoneill.com/video/HistBWclimb.html


On an aside - OP has logged in and not posted to his little masterpiece since his last one. Guess he's just sitting back and laughing at the train wreck. Or sobered up and realized what an ass he came off as. Or is busily pecking away at the Mother Of ALL Replies.... Or something

And i'm the emotionally unstable one. Right. Not that it matters, but after my last post I left for a few good days at rumney. No crowds, no misbehaving dogs, no fucking kids.

I may be wasting my time, but I'm going to attempt to talk to you in a rational manner. This ain't the mother of all replies, either.

I think you have your physics quite wrong on the rock throwing issue, and while this is a symptom and not a disease, I will still waste my precious time explaining what I witnessed to you. Picture this if you will:
The largest of the children, possibly 4 years old, was rather elated that he had sent his 5.3 ramp proj. So excited, that it necessitated throwing, with both hands and over his head (soccer/throw in style) several large rocks down the trail. Probably 4-5 pounds each, and while they didn't fly more than 3-4 feet as you suggest, they sure did bounce and roll for quite the distance. The nearest adult's immediate response was rationality where there was no call for it, "Jimmy(name intentionally changed), don't throw rocks. You might hurt some one."
That is some pretty sound logic, and if the little shithead was able to wrap his brain around such a concept, perhaps the behavior would have stopped there. Alas, that was not the case, and another rock careened down the trail.
"Jimmy, what did I tell you? You might hurt someone."
Another rock, and another similar response before one of the soccer milfs stepped in, sorely lacking a cookie and a bj for me.

So far, you've called me emotionally unstable, and with anger issues. Hell, you've even insinuated substance abuse issues. That sounds real mature.


shadowsandwich


Aug 6, 2009, 2:01 AM
Post #281 of 357 (4159 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 3, 2004
Posts: 55

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I love how climberguy has been surfing his artfully crafted tsunami for 9 pages now. Laugh


climberguy2011


Aug 6, 2009, 2:09 AM
Post #282 of 357 (4149 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [lena_chita] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Let me dissuade some of the controversy.
I don't hate children.
I respect members of society who feel the need to fire out a kid to keep the species going, and i'm positive that there are many great parents out there who can produce the next sharma. Someone has to.
My complaint is not with the kids. They are not able to distinguish correct and incorrect behavior. My grievance is with the parents who expose their children to needless risk, and to the parents who foster needless risk and general annoyance on other climbers by bringing their unsupervised rabble to the crag. If I decided to bring a full marching band to help me send, provided they weren't chucking rocks or acting irresponsibly, that's cool right?
By the way, I send best to sousa marches.
2 parents + 1 'responsible' kid + one secluded area = ok. Divert from that formula, and there is issues. When you find it necessary to bring a tent, several mini firetrucks, and the other accouterments, it becomes not ok.


climberguy2011


Aug 6, 2009, 2:13 AM
Post #283 of 357 (4142 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [snowboardercolo] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

snowboardercolo wrote:
Hmmm,
Cute kids with HOT moms. Has anyone else noticed how HOT they look? I vote for the MOMS!
You come off as a unused tool that craves attention. Wow "Sending some sick 5.9s?" Is there such a thing? What a NOOB!

Are you inept at detecting sarcasm when it is written?


climberguy2011


Aug 6, 2009, 2:19 AM
Post #284 of 357 (4140 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
I’m a craptastic parent who’s kids are trying to make the FBI watch list before they hit 10 yrs old. Not really, I just didn’t want to start another one of the “my kids are good” subject (even though they are).

I wanted to take Dingus’ point and go one further…

Those moms were demonstrating some awesome parenting. Who cares if they annoy anyone else? Pull that stick out of your ass and relax. Let ‘em scream. Let them cry. Let them throw all the rocks they want. Oohhhh. They might ruin your experience. So? Grow a bigger set of ear plugs. Don’t worry about those kids getting hurt. Unless you are some tightly wound numnuts member of a rescue squad, let ‘em get hurt. Let them throw that rock at each other. Who cares?

The OP troll was projecting his expectations of how a parent should act onto others. Probably even projecting how his parents treated him and called that “right” and now wants everyone else should behave in that manner. Get over it. If that had been a bunch of 21 year olds with beer, screamin’, yellin’, throwin rocks at each other and passing beer back and forth while their hottie girlfriends climbed, the OP would have strolled over to see what all the fun was about. The OP shoulda done the same with the kids. Who know, he might have gotten cookies and a bj.

Same with a restaurant: Let the kids scream, let them wander all over. If you also got out of your tightly would “I must be repressed” mindset you would see that life is much better if you look to join the fun instead of hearing the noise.

Aside from scoring a cookie and a bj from a hot sendstress, I don't really relate to anything you've written.
Let your kids run rampant in restaurants and other areas?
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'
Stand by and watch as a child is injured?
Seriously? Should I stand by and watch as the mother buckles in the 30 pack of the beer, but not the kid? Or call the police? The only reason that I didn't move to stop the kid from falling was that I was 3 bolts up, and in a rather inconvenient position to do so.
Your logic is flawed.


climberguy2011


Aug 6, 2009, 2:21 AM
Post #285 of 357 (4138 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 42

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
Well, hopefully those ears are deft enough to avoid any rocks that might be thrown their way by a delinquent in the making 3 year old!

Do three year olds have the sense to yell 'rock' after they throw their rock over the edge? What sound does a falling rock make when it does not strike anything on it's flight?


zeke_sf


Aug 6, 2009, 2:43 AM
Post #286 of 357 (4119 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [kriso9tails] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I truly wish I had the time and patience to read all twelve pages of this thread. I am positive, however, that the discussion is a civil one going in constructive directions and I encourage everybody to keep up the good work!


JasonsDrivingForce


Aug 6, 2009, 3:15 AM
Post #287 of 357 (4100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 3, 2009
Posts: 687

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Let me dissuade some of the controversy.
I don't hate children.
I respect members of society who feel the need to fire out a kid to keep the species going, and i'm positive that there are many great parents out there who can produce the next sharma. Someone has to.
My complaint is not with the kids. They are not able to distinguish correct and incorrect behavior. My grievance is with the parents who expose their children to needless risk, and to the parents who foster needless risk and general annoyance on other climbers by bringing their unsupervised rabble to the crag. If I decided to bring a full marching band to help me send, provided they weren't chucking rocks or acting irresponsibly, that's cool right?
By the way, I send best to sousa marches.
2 parents + 1 'responsible' kid + one secluded area = ok. Divert from that formula, and there is issues. When you find it necessary to bring a tent, several mini firetrucks, and the other accouterments, it becomes not ok.

So if the child had just quietly "sended" a nice 5.5 with no hoop-la and then waited patiently while the parental units did there thing then we wouldn't have ever had this thread?


climbsomething


Aug 6, 2009, 3:21 AM
Post #288 of 357 (4087 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 30, 2002
Posts: 8588

Re: [zeke_sf] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
I truly wish I had the time and patience to read all twelve pages of this thread. I am positive, however, that the discussion is a civil one going in constructive directions and I encourage everybody to keep up the good work!
Actually, it's not nearly as messy as the Brotherhood of the Dopes thread.


shadowsandwich


Aug 6, 2009, 3:25 AM
Post #289 of 357 (4079 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 3, 2004
Posts: 55

Re: [JasonsDrivingForce] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
So if the child had just quietly "sended" a nice 5.5 with no hoop-la and then waited patiently while the parental units did there thing then we wouldn't have ever had this thread?

Pretty much, yeah


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 6, 2009, 11:44 AM
Post #290 of 357 (4043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
I’m a craptastic parent who’s kids are trying to make the FBI watch list before they hit 10 yrs old. Not really, I just didn’t want to start another one of the “my kids are good” subject (even though they are).

I wanted to take Dingus’ point and go one further…

Those moms were demonstrating some awesome parenting. Who cares if they annoy anyone else? Pull that stick out of your ass and relax. Let ‘em scream. Let them cry. Let them throw all the rocks they want. Oohhhh. They might ruin your experience. So? Grow a bigger set of ear plugs. Don’t worry about those kids getting hurt. Unless you are some tightly wound numnuts member of a rescue squad, let ‘em get hurt. Let them throw that rock at each other. Who cares?

The OP troll was projecting his expectations of how a parent should act onto others. Probably even projecting how his parents treated him and called that “right” and now wants everyone else should behave in that manner. Get over it. If that had been a bunch of 21 year olds with beer, screamin’, yellin’, throwin rocks at each other and passing beer back and forth while their hottie girlfriends climbed, the OP would have strolled over to see what all the fun was about. The OP shoulda done the same with the kids. Who know, he might have gotten cookies and a bj.

Same with a restaurant: Let the kids scream, let them wander all over. If you also got out of your tightly would “I must be repressed” mindset you would see that life is much better if you look to join the fun instead of hearing the noise.

Aside from scoring a cookie and a bj from a hot sendstress, I don't really relate to anything you've written.
Let your kids run rampant in restaurants and other areas?
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'
Stand by and watch as a child is injured?
Seriously? Should I stand by and watch as the mother buckles in the 30 pack of the beer, but not the kid? Or call the police? The only reason that I didn't move to stop the kid from falling was that I was 3 bolts up, and in a rather inconvenient position to do so.
Your logic is flawed.

Yes this is a total troll reply, just can’t help myself.

In reply to:
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'

The rule was an awful mistake of parenting that somehow got credence as a “rule”. It is a parenting theory designed to build individuals who can successfully be on the bottom of a highly hierarchical organization where extreme deference to ones superiors is required. If you were raised that way, please seek counseling. It may be the only hope for you.

Kids will be loud and active. Teenagers will be loud and should be active. Adults should be loud and active.

As for the kids, let ‘em fall. They need to. They need to hurt themselves, as long as it isn’t fatal, life threatening, or permanently disfiguring, then it is good for them. They need to learn to make judgments themselves about dangers and risks. They don’t learn that judgment from hearing mom scream at them and hit them if they go too far. When mom yells at them all they learn is that mom can yell. When they hit the ground they learn quickly not to do that again. They need to fall to learn. Mom needs to tell the consequences before hand in a calm manner (as they did) so that afterwards they can draw the connection to the action and the result. Mom doesn’t own not hitting another kid with a rock, the kid owns that. The sooner the kids learn they own their actions, the better they will be. Seems like the moms were doing a good job.

You should help if there is something the kids or the moms don’t know, same as you should if it was teenage girls. Your social responsibilities comes not from being an additional “adult” in the situation, but another equal person in the group. Don’t try to be the adult, be the biggest kid.

However, if the 3 moms have 30 beers then they were definitely on the prowl and you missed your chance.

Basically, I’m trying to say again, relax, join the fun. Those look like some sweet dump trucks that you missed playing with and that tent looked awesome. Throw a rock or two, even at your friends. Get over your idea of what it is like to “grow up”, it isn’t what you think it is.


sbaclimber


Aug 6, 2009, 12:15 PM
Post #291 of 357 (4037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Your social responsibilities comes not from being an additional “adult” in the situation, but another equal person in the group.
The only problem with this theory is, as an "adult" you're not allowed to throw the rocks back at the kids.
That would give them the opportunity to quickly, effectively and personally experience the consequences of their actions.LaughTongue


(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Aug 6, 2009, 12:17 PM)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 6, 2009, 1:00 PM
Post #292 of 357 (4019 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [sbaclimber] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sbaclimber wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Your social responsibilities comes not from being an additional “adult” in the situation, but another equal person in the group.
The only problem with this theory is, as an "adult" you're not allowed to throw the rocks back at the kids.
That would give them the opportunity to quickly, effectively and personally experience the consequences of their actions.LaughTongue

Too easy.

Option A: Hit the MILF on the tush with a small rock. Point at kid when she turns around. Repete. Caution, if you get caught, you might get spanked.

Option B: Hit kid 1 with a small rock, point at kid 2. Hit kid 2 with small rock, point at kid 1. Hilarity ensues.


sbaclimber


Aug 6, 2009, 1:07 PM
Post #293 of 357 (4016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Option A: Hit the MILF on the tush with a small rock. Point at kid when she turns around. Repete. Caution, if you get caught, you might get spanked.
Not necessarily a bad thing. Win-win either wayCool

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Option B: Hit kid 1 with a small rock, point at kid 2. Hit kid 2 with small rock, point at kid 1. Hilarity ensues.
Sly


markc


Aug 6, 2009, 1:57 PM
Post #294 of 357 (3996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Let me dissuade some of the controversy.
I don't hate children.
I respect members of society who feel the need to fire out a kid to keep the species going, and i'm positive that there are many great parents out there who can produce the next sharma. Someone has to.
My complaint is not with the kids. They are not able to distinguish correct and incorrect behavior. My grievance is with the parents who expose their children to needless risk, and to the parents who foster needless risk and general annoyance on other climbers by bringing their unsupervised rabble to the crag. If I decided to bring a full marching band to help me send, provided they weren't chucking rocks or acting irresponsibly, that's cool right?
By the way, I send best to sousa marches.
2 parents + 1 'responsible' kid + one secluded area = ok. Divert from that formula, and there is issues. When you find it necessary to bring a tent, several mini firetrucks, and the other accouterments, it becomes not ok.

You honestly think that the best strategy for managing kids at the crag is to not bring toys, a small tent or blanket they can retreat to, etc? Then they're supposed to angelically sit the proper distance from the cliff, awaiting their turn to climb? If you ever have kids, some of those notions are going to crash down pretty hard.

As a relatively recent parent, I'll give some unrequested advice you may never need. With my kid, I stack the deck in my favor as much as possible. I've seen climbers with much more crap than I bring, sometimes with the bulk of it strewn around the base. If a couple toys (without batteries) and a blanket wreck your day, I don't know how you manage to exist from day to day.

Regarding the marching band, can you have them leave the uniforms at home? Those things have to be a pain to clean, and it's a little too formal for the crag. If they're loud, my partners and I can go with non-verbal communication.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 6, 2009, 3:47 PM
Post #295 of 357 (3968 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
Let me dissuade some of the controversy.
I don't hate children.
I respect members of society who feel the need to fire out a kid to keep the species going, and i'm positive that there are many great parents out there who can produce the next sharma. Someone has to.
My complaint is not with the kids. They are not able to distinguish correct and incorrect behavior. My grievance is with the parents who expose their children to needless risk, and to the parents who foster needless risk and general annoyance on other climbers by bringing their unsupervised rabble to the crag. If I decided to bring a full marching band to help me send, provided they weren't chucking rocks or acting irresponsibly, that's cool right?
By the way, I send best to sousa marches.
2 parents + 1 'responsible' kid + one secluded area = ok. Divert from that formula, and there is issues. When you find it necessary to bring a tent, several mini firetrucks, and the other accouterments, it becomes not ok.

How does a fire-truck or a playtent affect you? how is it different from other gear on the ground?

I admit that i have never brought a playtent for my kids, and the toy rule is that it has to fit in THEIR backpack, and they have to carry it. Yes, even at the age of 3 yo my daughter was carrying a very small backpack. My son often lugs 15 pounds worth fo books to read with him. My daughter usually carries a notepad and crayons, and a small washable toy in addition to her climbing shoes and harness. Right now we are having a bit of a problem b/c she had outgrown the tiny knapsack that she was carrying as a 3-5yo, but the next size of backpacks (the standard school backpack size) is still too big for her. She carries it, but it makes her walk quite a bit slower than the rest of the group.

However, the above is really b/c of my convenience (I don't want to carry a playtent!) and b/c of my belief that kids should be responsible for their own belongings. I believe it is important for my kids, but
I do not in any way object to OTHER people bringing playtents or whatever toys they want for their kids.

Kids are different, what they need is different, too. A stranger is in no position to decide what they need.

And restricting the number of kids to any arbitrary number ( like 1) is meaningless, too. Sometimes having two kids along will be way better than one b/c they play with each other and are thus less bored and less prone to whining and annoying behaviors.

Three is often the worst number, especially for little kids b/c there is always an odd one out, but not always.

And once again, the parents, if they are any good, would be the best judges of what sort of group size would work best for their children, and how they respond to other kids, b/c some kids just wind each other up, no matter what you do.


robbovius


Aug 6, 2009, 4:40 PM
Post #296 of 357 (3941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [j_ung] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

And creating a potentially unsafe environment for other climbers is what you call true success? Parenting FAIL. Tongue

No man, included in the "measure of success", is its opposite, known colloquially as "failure". knowhatImean? much like th OP, I wold have been annoyed too. the difference being, I wouldn't have ranted about it ineffectually online.

I wasn't even talking about climbing, had more to do with the ulitmate maturity level of the OP, and his comment about never having kids.

was my point really that obscure?

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

In reply to:
This is the exact type of of uncompromising inconsiderate crap that, pardon the pun, breeds conflict in these situations. It's the opposite side of the ridiculous coin the OP flipped ten pages back.

You know I luvs ya, R (friend way), but go "raise" yourself.

no way. that's my girlfriend's job.


robbovius


Aug 6, 2009, 4:52 PM
Post #297 of 357 (3936 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [spanishbombs] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spanishbombs wrote:
That said, I fear that some of the points are falling on deft ears.

some are more deft then others.


spanishbombs


Aug 6, 2009, 5:10 PM
Post #298 of 357 (3928 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2009
Posts: 13

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberguy2011 wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
Well, hopefully those ears are deft enough to avoid any rocks that might be thrown their way by a delinquent in the making 3 year old!

Do three year olds have the sense to yell 'rock' after they throw their rock over the edge? What sound does a falling rock make when it does not strike anything on it's flight?

whooosh!


kellie


Aug 6, 2009, 7:18 PM
Post #299 of 357 (3892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 15, 2003
Posts: 125

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson


gmggg


Aug 6, 2009, 7:44 PM
Post #300 of 357 (3869 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [kellie] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

A couple problems with that list:

Jesus had kids

Some on that list are L/G and lived in times that would make kids difficult

Kant was insane

And nearly everybody selfishly spent there time sucking up to humanity with "good deeds" and "political revolutions"

Just a bunch of boy scout and punk rocker adolescent scum like the rest of us who decided that, or happened not to, squeeze out some spawn.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 6, 2009, 8:09 PM
Post #301 of 357 (4065 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [gmggg] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

A couple problems with that list:

Jesus had kids

Some on that list are L/G and lived in times that would make kids difficult

Kant was insane

And nearly everybody selfishly spent there time sucking up to humanity with "good deeds" and "political revolutions"

Just a bunch of boy scout and punk rocker adolescent scum like the rest of us who decided that, or happened not to, squeeze out some spawn.

Emanual Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.


gmggg


Aug 6, 2009, 8:17 PM
Post #302 of 357 (4059 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
gmggg wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

A couple problems with that list:

Jesus had kids

Some on that list are L/G and lived in times that would make kids difficult

Kant was insane

And nearly everybody selfishly spent there time sucking up to humanity with "good deeds" and "political revolutions"

Just a bunch of boy scout and punk rocker adolescent scum like the rest of us who decided that, or happened not to, squeeze out some spawn.

Emanual Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.

Good on ya Bruce.

No Pooftas!


marc801


Aug 6, 2009, 8:50 PM
Post #303 of 357 (4047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.
Who the fuck are you to be so incredibly arrogant to impose your self-righteous value judgment bullshit on the rest of us?

[Edit to fix quotes]


(This post was edited by marc801 on Aug 6, 2009, 8:56 PM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 6, 2009, 8:59 PM
Post #304 of 357 (4038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [marc801] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

He's just another deluded human; same as the rest of us.... We all have our blind spots; this is one of his.


kriso9tails


Aug 6, 2009, 9:00 PM
Post #305 of 357 (4036 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [gmggg] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Some on that list are L/G and lived in times that would make kids difficult

That's sort of beside the point.


zeke_sf


Aug 6, 2009, 9:03 PM
Post #306 of 357 (4029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [kellie] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

Not a bad list. How about compiling the other, exponentially growing list of retarded shit heaps who should have been spayed or neutered as soon as they hit puberty?


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 6, 2009, 9:15 PM
Post #307 of 357 (4004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [gmggg] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
gmggg wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

A couple problems with that list:

Jesus had kids

Some on that list are L/G and lived in times that would make kids difficult

Kant was insane

And nearly everybody selfishly spent there time sucking up to humanity with "good deeds" and "political revolutions"

Just a bunch of boy scout and punk rocker adolescent scum like the rest of us who decided that, or happened not to, squeeze out some spawn.

Emanual Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.

Good on ya Bruce.

No Pooftas!

What's new Bruce gonna teach?


nilcarborundum


Aug 6, 2009, 9:22 PM
Post #308 of 357 (3996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2007
Posts: 3667

Re: [zeke_sf] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

Not a bad list. How about compiling the other, exponentially growing list of retarded shit heaps who should have been spayed or neutered as soon as they hit puberty?

Good idea. I'll get it started.

1) zeke_sf


zeke_sf


Aug 6, 2009, 9:27 PM
Post #309 of 357 (3995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [nilcarborundum] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

nilcarborundum wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

Not a bad list. How about compiling the other, exponentially growing list of retarded shit heaps who should have been spayed or neutered as soon as they hit puberty?

Good idea. I'll get it started.

1) zeke_sf

Hahaha... So, has Mrs. Nilcarborwhozerface decided you two are gonna pop out some spuds yet?

Oh yes, take me off that list. Ever since the accident at the peanut shelling plant, I don't technically qualify.


nilcarborundum


Aug 6, 2009, 9:51 PM
Post #310 of 357 (3982 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2007
Posts: 3667

Re: [zeke_sf] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
nilcarborundum wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

Not a bad list. How about compiling the other, exponentially growing list of retarded shit heaps who should have been spayed or neutered as soon as they hit puberty?

Good idea. I'll get it started.

1) zeke_sf

Hahaha... So, has Mrs. Nilcarborwhozerface decided you two are gonna pop out some spuds yet?

Oh yes, take me off that list. Ever since the accident at the peanut shelling plant, I don't technically qualify.

Yes she has. Luckily, she has two more years of skoolin', and then she'll probably want me to make an honest woman of her, and I think I can stretch the wedding planning out a year. I think a solid regimen of illicit drugs should render me sterile by then.


technogeekery


Aug 7, 2009, 3:09 AM
Post #311 of 357 (3949 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2009
Posts: 146

Re: [nilcarborundum] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zeke_sf wrote:
I think a solid regimen of illicit drugs should render me sterile by then.

I thought that too, but it doesn't work. And your kids come out strange...

Tongue


subantz


Aug 7, 2009, 3:43 AM
Post #312 of 357 (3943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247

Re: [JasonsDrivingForce] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Your hunny. I loves me some JDF. At least you have seen that I like to start big fire. I am Alright with kids. I mean kids that are not out of control. Parents you know who you are. Then you have children that are absolutly kool to be around. Ya know


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 12:27 PM
Post #313 of 357 (3918 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [marc801] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.
Who the fuck are you to be so incredibly arrogant to impose your self-righteous value judgment bullshit on the rest of us?

[Edit to fix quotes]

Oh no, I think my arrogance is quite credible.

there's no rigtheousness to it, really. Consider "Life" itself, as one great, ameobic, non- (or semi-) sentient organism. It has but one imperative, and one motivation, simply to continue its existence, and survive.

viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing.

Thus, the only meaningful success, in fulfilling Life's agenda, is to propagate the respective species you belong to. you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

Life doesn't care if you climb, or spend your existance in altruistic pursuits, or anything. it only cares that you continue its survival.

Life has its own agenda, and we are only another in the many experiments its tried in its pursuit of continuation and survival. all else, all human-scale endeavours and cares, are a gloss over Life's imperative.


(This post was edited by robbovius on Aug 7, 2009, 12:28 PM)


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 12:48 PM
Post #314 of 357 (3913 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [kellie] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kellie wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.

And for the curious, here's a short list of a few of those kind of people

Mother Teresa
George Washington
Immanuel Kant
Jesus Christ
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony
Julia Child
Rosa Parks
the Dalai Lama
Georgia O'Keefe
Amelia Earhart
Harriet Tubman
Emily Dickinson

this is a rather inconsistent list.

first off, Jesus Christ is arguably a mythical being. what's that doing on there? you might as well have included Odin, or Anubis.

this list doens't really refute my argument, even for those who'se lives were given to altruism, which doesn't include the adventurers like Amelia E. she spent her life engaging in ever more daring and risky pursuits, until her tragic and mysterious end. How is that not selfish?

George washington was also an adventurer, spending the greater portion of his adult life in directing combat. his cultural relevance, infact is centered on his military pursuits. his presidency is simply an addendum to that, a satisfying coda.

The Dalai Lama was chosen, as a child adn indoctrinated to his semi-divinty. he got no choice as to whether he'd be childless or not. again this doesn't really refute my argument

I made my assertion knowing that its rather easy to find examples of people who accomplished great things and contributed positively to humanity and the human experience and condition, and who can be looked up to as icons of achievement and purpose.

But...it is also as easy to compile a list of other iconic figures, who included parenting as an integral part of those successes.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 12:50 PM
Post #315 of 357 (3912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing.

I view life on the universal scale. I think other things do matter, like the temperature of my coffee, the soft touch of a hot woman and the smell of granite after the first drops of rain.

In reply to:
Thus, the only meaningful success, in fulfilling Life's agenda, is to propagate the respective species you belong to. you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

Prove it. No photo, no summit, btw. Gotta call you out on this one hehe.

DMT


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 12:58 PM
Post #316 of 357 (3907 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
I made my assertion knowing that its rather easy to find examples of people who accomplished great things and contributed positively to humanity and the human experience and condition, and who can be looked up to as icons of achievement and purpose.

But...it is also as easy to compile a list of other iconic figures, who included parenting as an integral part of those successes.

Life doesn'd give a shit about this debate. It said so... life speaks to me.

DMT


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 1:00 PM
Post #317 of 357 (3906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing.

I view life on the universal scale. I think other things do matter, like the temperature of my coffee, the soft touch of a hot woman and the smell of granite after the first drops of rain.

In reply to:
Thus, the only meaningful success, in fulfilling Life's agenda, is to propagate the respective species you belong to. you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

Prove it. No photo, no summit, btw. Gotta call you out on this one hehe.

DMT

eerrr. damn. y'know, I had pics of my kids up on a couple photo hosting sites, but since all the hassle last year with that asswipe bristolpipe from NEclimbs.com stalking me - which included linking pics of my friends and offering them up for ridicule - I've since taken all the pictures of my kids down, and I'm really hesitant to put any back up. these days, regarding posting anything openly about people close to me, I admit ot having soem serious trust issues.

sucks, because I'm a proud dad, and like showing them off.


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 1:04 PM
Post #318 of 357 (3904 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
I made my assertion knowing that its rather easy to find examples of people who accomplished great things and contributed positively to humanity and the human experience and condition, and who can be looked up to as icons of achievement and purpose.

But...it is also as easy to compile a list of other iconic figures, who included parenting as an integral part of those successes.

Life doesn'd give a shit about this debate. It said so... life speaks to me.

DMT

I know. its ruthless, totally uncaring as to the individual.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 7, 2009, 1:11 PM
Post #319 of 357 (3899 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In the "Life" cycle that you refer to, it's been shown - over and over again - that left to it's own devices, the effect is over use of resources. Which leads to destruction of the home ship.

I posit that it goes to follow that the TRUE purpose of all life is actually what we humans refer to as death. Personally, I see this phase as the "rest stage" in part of the cycle. Within the rest stage is bliss.

Think not? Are the scenes within dreams more sublime that those of the walking day(if not, perhaps lay off the mind altering substances and lessen youe stress, both of which interfere). It's been shown(through science) that the mind and body heals during sleep phase. Is vacation time not more wonderful than the work between? Do not injured beings recoup through rest?

You see, Robb - your illusion does not extend beyond the realm of "life" and that is the crux that must be overcome in order to see the flaw in your theory.

We all - all - seek to return to the primordial ooze. the state of "non," where we just "are."

But - no problem, if you don't see it that way. Most don't.


mojomonkey


Aug 7, 2009, 1:21 PM
Post #320 of 357 (3877 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing

Even accepting this proposition, you are being pretty short-sighted if you think "breeding" is then the only success criteria. Take Dean Kamen for instance - if his inventions (medical, mobility, water purification, ...) raise the quality of life for some percentage of the population, that is "helping life to survive". Someone that may have died of dehydration can now live. And yes, maybe breed. Or maybe they make breakthroughs which help others.

Number of kids is a pretty dumb measuring stick for success.

And no, I don't even know if Dean Kamen has kids. The Wikipedia article didn't mention family and I don't really care to investigate. Regardless of his family life I'd say he is helping life survive.


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 1:28 PM
Post #321 of 357 (3874 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [happiegrrrl] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
In the "Life" cycle that you refer to, it's been shown - over and over again - that left to it's own devices, the effect is over use of resources. Which leads to destruction of the home ship.

absolutely, Life is utterly ruthless and driven, uncaring of consequence. that we, humanity, are aware of our ioveruse of resources, simply indicates that we are the first oflife's experiments to show a glimmer of awareness regarding our survival in a universal context.

In reply to:
I posit that it goes to follow that the TRUE purpose of all life is actually what we humans refer to as death. Personally, I see this phase as the "rest stage" in part of the cycle. Within the rest stage is bliss.

Think not? Are the scenes within dreams more sublime that those of the walking day(if not, perhaps lay off the mind altering substances and lessen youe stress, both of which interfere). It's been shown(through science) that the mind and body heals during sleep phase. Is vacation time not more wonderful than the work between? Do not injured beings recoup through rest?

Happie, this "rest stage" you speak of is integral to and inseparable from Life. studies have also shown that if the individual is deprived of the "rest stage", there are serious health, and thereby survivability, consequences. So, your argument isn't really that far removed from what I'm going on about.

In reply to:
You see, Robb - your illusion does not extend beyond the realm of "life" and that is the crux that must be overcome in order to see the flaw in your theory.

I admit to being essentially a physicalist.
"beyond the realm of life..." hmm. the realm of life includes death. My mortality is close to me and walks with me every day - that final oblivion adn non-existence. dreams are your brain running a defrag.

calling what i've written a theory, is overly flattering I think. but ,thanks ;-) its barely a hypothesis. does this constitute a peer review?

In reply to:
We all - all - seek to return to the primordial ooze. the state of "non," where we just "are."

In reply to:
But - no problem, if you don't see it that way. Most don't.

in this last comment, as related our differng personal ideas on this topic - which is likely the best hijack I've ever commited - we find congruence in our experience.


(This post was edited by robbovius on Aug 7, 2009, 1:39 PM)


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 1:38 PM
Post #322 of 357 (3864 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [mojomonkey] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mojomonkey wrote:
robbovius wrote:
viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing

Even accepting this proposition, you are being pretty short-sighted if you think "breeding" is then the only success criteria.

no, forget the human scale. view Life - all of it, every species, every entity, as one single collective organism - analogous to all the differentiated cells within your own body, with all their different functions constituting a single collective organism.

what most matters to that collective organism, at its most basic level? what is its essential imperative?


In reply to:
Take Dean Kamen for instance - if his inventions (medical, mobility, water purification, ...) raise the quality of life for some percentage of the population, that is "helping life to survive". Someone that may have died of dehydration can now live. And yes, maybe breed. Or maybe they make breakthroughs which help others.

again this only realtes to the human scale and excludes the rest of the collective organism. does it actually matter to that overall organism?

In reply to:
Number of kids is a pretty dumb measuring stick for success.

not if you want your own reality show.

In reply to:
And no, I don't even know if Dean Kamen has kids. The Wikipedia article didn't mention family and I don't really care to investigate. Regardless of his family life I'd say he is helping life survive.

your life? mine? tube worms? dolphins? wasps? parameceum? what percentage of the collective organism?


mojomonkey


Aug 7, 2009, 1:50 PM
Post #323 of 357 (3850 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You are really reaching. I was giving an example to illustrate the flaw in your statement:

In reply to:
you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

Dean Kamen, regardless of progeny is still successful based on your own criteria. He helped live survive without breeding.

So fine, we can jump species. Take a bee hive. Other than queens, the females are sterile workers. They gather food and maintain the hive. They are essential to sustaining the life of that hive and can't possibly breed. So they are failures.

There is a more global view you are missing. Yes, any form of life needs, as a group, to reproduce to sustain itself. Not every single one of its members needs to breed.


wonderwoman


Aug 7, 2009, 2:05 PM
Post #324 of 357 (3840 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm a happy full time step-mom and yet I still hear an endless stream of 'When are you going to have one of your own?' from co-workers and relatives. It makes me mad for a few reasons. First, it dismisses the fact that I am already raising a great kid (just because she is not biologically mine, doesn't make this less true. She is my daughter. I am her mother. I am raising her.). Second, it's none of their business why I don't have a baby. And third, I never seem to hear this question asked of my childless male colleagues.

If someone asks me this question twice, I will tell him that the discussion makes me feel uncomfortable and to please never ask me again. Sometimes I want to tell the asker that I can't have babies, just to see the look on the other person's face. Maybe that will make him think twice before asking another person this question.

I think that it's wildly inappropriate to impose reproductive values on other people. It's a personal decision, and if someone does not have a child, then there may be a pretty good reason for it.

But let's bring this conversation back on track. If ever I did have a baby, I would bring it to the crag. But I would only let it throw rocks at climberguy.


jamincan


Aug 7, 2009, 2:40 PM
Post #325 of 357 (3821 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I'm not sure that reproduction is always in the best interest of your so-called "collective organism." Taken to an extreme reproduction can be harmful - consider cancer for example. Arguably, considering how harmful human beings generally are to the biosphere in general, we might as well be considered a harmful tumor, in which case it would be in this collective organism's best interest not to have humans reproduce.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 2:54 PM
Post #326 of 357 (3311 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I'm a happy full time step-mom and yet I still hear an endless stream of 'When are you going to have one of your own?' from co-workers and relatives. It makes me mad for a few reasons. First, it dismisses the fact that I am already raising a great kid (just because she is not biologically mine, doesn't make this less true. She is my daughter. I am her mother. I am raising her.). Second, it's none of their business why I don't have a baby. And third, I never seem to hear this question asked of my childless male colleagues.

I hear you and am sensitive to this topic. I have a weird sort of blended family much more complicated than yours.

Anyway, the one thing I would ask is this - if its none of their business how do they know yours is a step child as opposed to bio. And if you told them then I reckon it IS their business? You made it so?

Just asking, not provoking. But it seems to me we enable our questioners with details that in turns provokes their curiousity. Its one of the reasons I do not talk about climbing at work, for example. it IS none of their business and I work to keep it that way.

DMT


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 3:06 PM
Post #327 of 357 (3297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [mojomonkey] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mojomonkey wrote:
You are really reaching. I was giving an example to illustrate the flaw in your statement:

In reply to:
you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

well, conversely, in order to see my point you're not reaching far enough.

In reply to:
So fine, we can jump species. Take a bee hive. Other than queens, the females are sterile workers. They gather food and maintain the hive. They are essential to sustaining the life of that hive and can't possibly breed. So they are failures.

actually that's a really good analogy, and I have to agree, though yes individually they fail, but in the efforts of the collective organism - the hive - to survive, they succeed. This analogy follows to the human scale, verifying yoru assertion regarding Dean Kamen, and that list upthread.

still, though these non-breeders can be shown or argued to have a positive effect in terms of species survival, without that essential core of breeders their efforts are lost.

This doesn't refute my crank not-a-theory, but offers a corollary?

In reply to:

There is a more global view you are missing.
no, I disagree. of the two of us, my view is Life - all species, all entities, - viewed as a single collective organism - the "cell" analogy, a few posts ago - is more congruent with a "global" - as in all-encompassing analogy.

In reply to:
Yes, any form of life needs, as a group, to reproduce to sustain itself. Not every single one of its members needs to breed.

this falls back to eh human scale, and disregards the global, Life-as-one-organism view, see?

editted to fix cheesetit


(This post was edited by robbovius on Aug 7, 2009, 3:16 PM)


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 3:18 PM
Post #328 of 357 (3282 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
mojomonkey wrote:
You are really reaching. I was giving an example to illustrate the flaw in your statement:

In reply to:
you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

well, conversely, in order to see my point you're not reaching far enough.

In reply to:
So fine, we can jump species. Take a bee hive. Other than queens, the females are sterile workers. They gather food and maintain the hive. They are essential to sustaining the life of that hive and can't possibly breed. So they are failures.

actually that's a really good analogy, and I have to agree, though yes individually they fail, but in the efforts of the collective organism - the hive - to survive, they succeed. This analogy follows to the human scale, verifying yoru assertion regarding Dean Kamen, and that list upthread.

still, though these non-breeders can be shown or argued to have a positive effect in terms of species survival, without that essential core of breeders their efforts are lost.

This doesn't refute my crank not-a-theory, but offers a corollary?

In reply to:

There is a more global view you are missing.
no, I disagree. of the two of us, my view is Life - all species, all entities, - viewed as a single collective organism - the "cell" analogy, a few posts ago - is more congruent with a "global" - as in all-encompassing analogy.

In reply to:
Yes, any form of life needs, as a group, to reproduce to sustain itself. Not every single one of its members needs to breed.

this falls back to eh human scale, and disregards the global, Life-as-one-organism view, see?

editted to fix cheesetit

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Aug 7, 2009, 3:18 PM)


zchandran


Aug 7, 2009, 3:19 PM
Post #329 of 357 (3279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
In reply to:
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'

The rule was an awful mistake of parenting that somehow got credence as a “rule”. It is a parenting theory designed to build individuals who can successfully be on the bottom of a highly hierarchical organization where extreme deference to ones superiors is required. If you were raised that way, please seek counseling. It may be the only hope for you.

And yet by some miracle the kids raised under those anachronistic principles managed to win World War II, set foot on the moon, build the US into a superpower, and in general become "the greatest generation".

The current crop raised with self-esteem workshops and planned playdates might be psychologically very well adjusted, but I'll vouch for this, you put them in a high stress situation where it's all on them, and they usually can't find their asses with both hands and a flashlight. They're so busy being special and unique they don't know when to shut up and just get the job done.

Yeah, yeah, I'm an old grouch. Stuck inside this weekend so even more so...


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 3:25 PM
Post #330 of 357 (3274 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [zchandran] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
In reply to:
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'

The rule was an awful mistake of parenting that somehow got credence as a “rule”. It is a parenting theory designed to build individuals who can successfully be on the bottom of a highly hierarchical organization where extreme deference to ones superiors is required. If you were raised that way, please seek counseling. It may be the only hope for you.

And yet by some miracle the kids raised under those anachronistic principles managed to win World War II, set foot on the moon, build the US into a superpower, and in general become "the greatest generation".

Talk about a blanket statement!

My Pop wasn't raised that way. His Pop engaged him and his sibliings, much as my Pop engaged me and my siblings and much as I engage mine.

Dissent was not only tolerated it was encouraged and debated. Sure me, my pop and his pop before him had limits, we all do.

And yet? GOod parenting will out - most often in the form of parenting the next generation.

Child of a silent parent who demands silence in her children? You too will foist that on your kids, is the MOST LIKELY outcome.

We all respond to deep currents of time and generational learning. Its easy to pretend each generation is in isolation from those before and after bnut really its a continuim of course.

As my Pop says - we try to get better with each generation, but in the end its all sine waves and bell curves baby!

I visited 1000 year old ruins this past week. I bet the folks who lived it that city in the year 1000 were no fundamentally different than you or I.

DMT


mojomonkey


Aug 7, 2009, 3:28 PM
Post #331 of 357 (3270 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
mojomonkey wrote:
Yes, any form of life needs, as a group, to reproduce to sustain itself. Not every single one of its members needs to breed.

this falls back to eh human scale, and disregards the global, Life-as0-one-organism view, see?

I'm not sure how I fell back to the human scale... The success of the entire life-as-one-organism view still doesn't map to any individual "cell" reproducing or not as success or failure. There are other ways that it can contribute to the success of the organism as a whole than simply reproducing. This is the point of the Dean Kamen or worker bee examples.

And jamincan illustrated another flaw in your statement that breed=you win, no breed=you fail. Reproduction of a single class of "cells" may not be good for the whole. Taken to an extreme, some super virus that is able to indiscriminately spread across and kill species would breed like crazy. And wipe out life (including itself when it has no hosts left). It would be crazy successful, by your yard stick.

You defined the situation as
robbovius wrote:
you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

From my view, that is false on an individual scale (bees and Dean), and on a everything-is-one scale (virus, tumors).

Finally, the way you state it as some definitive, universal truth is what irks people. Even if you were right, your delivery is annoying and not going to convince others.


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 3:31 PM
Post #332 of 357 (3267 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 3:31 PM
Post #333 of 357 (3266 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [zchandran] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
The current crop raised with self-esteem workshops and planned playdates might be psychologically very well adjusted, but I'll vouch for this, you put them in a high stress situation where it's all on them, and they usually can't find their asses with both hands and a flashlight.

Tell that to the combat soldiers coming home from the war their boomer fathers started in Iraq.

Fact is most folks don't respond well to extreme stress. Now we climbers get to confront some elemental stress in our lives and so develop notions about what we can and cannot handle.

But a lot of your peers, how ever old you are... can't handle stress at all. They are, as a group, fat, stressed out and dying from diseases of obesity.

And these folks would presume to criticize combat soldiers as generationally lazy - merde! Those kids are going to be paying YOUR BILLS their entire lives and still you criticize them.

Talk about biting the (baby) hands that feed you...

DMT


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #334 of 357 (3259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.

Now you're just flailing. I game set matched you brother. Feel free to change tacks though, to more favorable winds.

DMT


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 3:33 PM
Post #335 of 357 (3257 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [mojomonkey] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mojomonkey wrote:
[Finally, the way you state it as some definitive, universal truth is what irks people. Even if you were right, your delivery is annoying and not going to convince others.

well, i did admit to my arrogance being entirely credible, point taken.

isnt' it a universal truth though? think of the Shakers.


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 3:36 PM
Post #336 of 357 (3252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.

Now you're just flailing. I game set matched you brother. Feel free to change tacks though, to more favorable winds.

DMT

how so? how does it fall apart under the conditions you mention?


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 3:38 PM
Post #337 of 357 (3249 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.

Now you're just flailing. I game set matched you brother. Feel free to change tacks though, to more favorable winds.

DMT

how so? how does it fall apart under the conditions you mention?

Your own words - breed or fail. You made this at the individual level. As soon as the fatal flaw was identified you started back tracking. Have the integrity to stick to your original argument and stop with the ridiculous qualifications. Its not like this 'theory' is yours anyway.... Sounds way Jurassic Park to me haha. The whole "Life wants to.." bit -= I know you know what I mean haha.

DMT


Toast_in_the_Machine


Aug 7, 2009, 3:39 PM
Post #338 of 357 (3248 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [zchandran] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
In reply to:
Whatever happened to the old 'seen and not heard rule?'

The rule was an awful mistake of parenting that somehow got credence as a “rule”. It is a parenting theory designed to build individuals who can successfully be on the bottom of a highly hierarchical organization where extreme deference to ones superiors is required. If you were raised that way, please seek counseling. It may be the only hope for you.

And yet by some miracle the kids raised under those anachronistic principles managed to win World War II, set foot on the moon, build the US into a superpower, and in general become "the greatest generation".

The current crop raised with self-esteem workshops and planned playdates might be psychologically very well adjusted, but I'll vouch for this, you put them in a high stress situation where it's all on them, and they usually can't find their asses with both hands and a flashlight. They're so busy being special and unique they don't know when to shut up and just get the job done.

Yeah, yeah, I'm an old grouch. Stuck inside this weekend so even more so...

Yeah but you put that old grouch into a meeting requiring them to multi-task and build consensus across multiple teams and multiple time zones and they will not do as well a them uppidy young-uns. Play dates and self esteem classes are better development skills for kids today than practice with their hunting rifle.

Sorry yer inside this weekend.


bobbj22


Aug 7, 2009, 4:12 PM
Post #339 of 357 (3235 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Physical maturity is static, everyone has the same process- at a point in your life your body will change the same way everybody else's does because its a stage of growth. It is indisputable to say that every persons' mental stage is time sensitive and the older you grow, the more likely you are to fulfill your own version of "our" purpose if you decide to do so.

Another thing is the difference between having children and raising children. Men can spread their seed and create children without ever knowing their existence. So, there is nothing chemically or mentally changing. The act of creation means nothing for men. In raising children, you accept the largest responsibility and job that you can imagine. You spend a large portion of your life dealing with things pertaining to that person. You express such a large amount of care and love that you feel as if you have finally filled your purpose in life. Well I wonder why. You spend a major portion of your life with them, you made them and have genetic similarities that make you"alike" and make them interesting, you feel more depended on and important than before, and you've cared so much that sometimes you forget that they are people and not posession (esp. when they are younger).

With that said, the same emotions and duties are felt and carried out by many CEOs. If this CEO is emotionally and mentally fulfilled with their life as it is, would bringing a child into the world make their life more fulfilled or important? I highly doubt it. There are people out there that don't even like their kids even though their kids are great people. That disproves your entire theory of success through parenting.

Another thing to discuss is the difference in what you call success. Viewing life based on the scale of the universe is meaningless in this discussion. You act as if we are mindless organisms with the inability to reason and will simply eat, bang, and rid ourselves of waste. Our brains evolved and we now have the capacity to understand that "life" will continue whether we decide it should or not. We don't need to aid in reproduction because we know we aren't in danger of losing our species.

Also, life doesn't care if you survive because life does not act as a conscious. We've used our newly-found brains to make birth-control without even a peep from life. If creating life was truly the purpose and acted as a conscious we would hate life itself because there would be so many people. Sexual stimulation is not a conscious, but a feeling, not a purpose. If it was truly the purpose then it would be a requirement for survival i.e. if starving-you eat, if bladder's full-you pee, if aroused-your choice.

I won't go further into detail but the purpose of life (to remain "alive"), the purpose of man (very disputable), and the purpose of an individual (varying) are entirely different and seem to overlap many times in this discussion.

Also robbovius, you are a dufus and need to come back down to this planet. You're probably obsessed with bacteria and other small organisms aren't you.


zchandran


Aug 7, 2009, 4:35 PM
Post #340 of 357 (3223 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
zchandran wrote:
The current crop raised with self-esteem workshops and planned playdates might be psychologically very well adjusted, but I'll vouch for this, you put them in a high stress situation where it's all on them, and they usually can't find their asses with both hands and a flashlight.

Tell that to the combat soldiers coming home from the war their boomer fathers started in Iraq.

Fact is most folks don't respond well to extreme stress. Now we climbers get to confront some elemental stress in our lives and so develop notions about what we can and cannot handle.

But a lot of your peers, how ever old you are... can't handle stress at all. They are, as a group, fat, stressed out and dying from diseases of obesity.

And these folks would presume to criticize combat soldiers as generationally lazy - merde! Those kids are going to be paying YOUR BILLS their entire lives and still you criticize them.

Talk about biting the (baby) hands that feed you...

DMT

Well, actually being in the Army, I talk to combat soldiers quite regularly. Wink

It's not a picnic right now in the Army and Marines, no matter what you believe from watching CNN. I think the overall consensus among the people who know better than me, i.e. those who have been in 20-25 years, is that younger people are just less capable of handling stress than older soldiers. Right now there's an epidemic of suicides, a special court is being set up for veterans who commit crimes after getting back, and the PTSD counselors can't keep up with their work loads. A few years ago the Army handed out "stress cards" during basic so that if you stressed out, you could wave your little white card and the drill sergeant would give you a time out. Even now the emphasis is on getting recruits to feel less stress because there are so MANY washouts.

As far as "multi-tasking", I think it's the biggest crock ever. Yeah, it looks impressive when you're updating your Myspace page while talking on the cell phone and watching TV, but how much are you actually getting done?

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/CAREER/trends/08/05/multitasking.focus/index.html

Also, I'm solidly Generation X, so by no means anywhere near the "greatest generation". I thought we were a bunch of slackers, but after seeing some of the lower twenties coming into the workforce now, I just have to go WTF?! If you don't give them constant daily praise they think you're out to get them. And heaven forbid you actually criticize anything they're doing without wrapping it in a proper 30 minute presentation to avoid hurting their feelings.

And obviously, I'm not talking about everyone. It's just the overall pattern. Come to think of it, combat soldiers probably aren't even that good a representative sample. The latte-drinking urban renewal types are too edumacated to send their kids anywhere near a recruiter...


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 4:36 PM
Post #341 of 357 (3223 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.

Now you're just flailing. I game set matched you brother. Feel free to change tacks though, to more favorable winds.

DMT

how so? how does it fall apart under the conditions you mention?

Your own words - breed or fail. You made this at the individual level. As soon as the fatal flaw was identified you started back tracking. Have the integrity to stick to your original argument and stop with the ridiculous qualifications. Its not like this 'theory' is yours anyway.... Sounds way Jurassic Park to me haha. The whole "Life wants to.." bit -= I know you know what I mean haha.

DMT

fuck! I can't even find where I wrote that, I mean, I know I did, I thought it had a nice ring, but i want to read thur all my posts and see where my arguments disassociate, but I've been back anf forth thru this stupid thread, and damned if I can find it...wanna link it for me?


robbovius


Aug 7, 2009, 4:39 PM
Post #342 of 357 (3221 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406

Re: [bobbj22] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobbj22 wrote:
Also robbovius, you are a dufus

dude, please, its "Doofus"

In reply to:
and need to come back down to this planet.

as much as I wish I could (all the BEST superheroes can fly), I can't fly.

In reply to:
You're probably obsessed with bacteria and other small organisms aren't you.

well, on the cosmological scale, humanity is arguably pretty infinitesimal, so...


jamincan


Aug 7, 2009, 4:56 PM
Post #343 of 357 (3208 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
marc801 wrote:
robbovius wrote:
the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

to not parent, the individual arguably denies his or herself the fullness of thier humanity. Also, they arrest their own development at some level between adolecence and adulthood. they never really have to do that last little bit of growing up, since, their lives still get to be pretty much all about them.
Who the fuck are you to be so incredibly arrogant to impose your self-righteous value judgment bullshit on the rest of us?

[Edit to fix quotes]

Oh no, I think my arrogance is quite credible.

there's no rigtheousness to it, really. Consider "Life" itself, as one great, ameobic, non- (or semi-) sentient organism. It has but one imperative, and one motivation, simply to continue its existence, and survive.

viewing Life on the scale of the universe, this imperative to survive and continue is the only thing that matters - the ONLY thing.

Thus, the only meaningful success, in fulfilling Life's agenda, is to propagate the respective species you belong to. you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail.

Life doesn't care if you climb, or spend your existance in altruistic pursuits, or anything. it only cares that you continue its survival.

Life has its own agenda, and we are only another in the many experiments its tried in its pursuit of continuation and survival. all else, all human-scale endeavours and cares, are a gloss over Life's imperative.

There you go. In all fairness, your original statement closer to the beginning of the thread was more along the lines that a person only fully matures by going through the stage of raising a child. Which is radically different from "you breed, you succeed, you don't, you fail."


zchandran


Aug 7, 2009, 5:03 PM
Post #344 of 357 (3206 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [jamincan] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jamincan wrote:
there's no rigtheousness to it, really. Consider "Life" itself, as one great, ameobic, non- (or semi-) sentient organism. It has but one imperative, and one motivation, simply to continue its existence, and survive.

Hmm... this has the flavor of "let epsilon be the smallest positive real number" that I used in many, many, homework assignments in college...


bobbj22


Aug 7, 2009, 5:05 PM
Post #345 of 357 (3204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dufus is a variant of doofus. Consult Webster's. It's like prussic and prussik.

You are mentally in your own little world...physically you are very much grounded. Nice try in making yourself seem clever.

Size is typically used in relation to yourself by us humans unless stated otherwise. Of course you are probably using the planted or the universe since you are obviously a massive nerd. Do you use a clock to tell time? After all, time is relative as well.


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 7, 2009, 5:23 PM
Post #346 of 357 (3187 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
fuck! I can't even find where I wrote that, I mean, I know I did, I thought it had a nice ring, but i want to read thur all my posts and see where my arguments disassociate, but I've been back anf forth thru this stupid thread, and damned if I can find it...wanna link it for me?


....Talk about Fail!
It's post # 82 where you wrote
In reply to:
then you will never, ever, not ever, fully mature, and will spend your life in a state of arrested adolescense.

....and every other parent reading this thread, knows that for the truth.

the truest fullness of your humanity, the only true measure of success, is in raising children. all else is gloss.

That may not be the exact quote but I think it does show Dingus' point that you had originally meant the "failure" was on a personal level, and not of the organic unit.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 5:24 PM
Post #347 of 357 (3186 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [robbovius] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:
robbovius wrote:
dingus wrote:

Seriously I think your 'breed or fail' theiory falls apart with herd and pack animals. It certainly falls apart in the hive world, where 99.9999% of a given species never breed, ever and yet... we still seem to have bees around, go figger!

DMT

Its the essentiality of breeding as neccesary to continuation, not the species-specific breeding behavioural model.

without breeding, creating new individuals, new "Cells" as it were, for the collective organism, the collective organism doesn't survive.

Now you're just flailing. I game set matched you brother. Feel free to change tacks though, to more favorable winds.

DMT

how so? how does it fall apart under the conditions you mention?

Your own words - breed or fail. You made this at the individual level. As soon as the fatal flaw was identified you started back tracking. Have the integrity to stick to your original argument and stop with the ridiculous qualifications. Its not like this 'theory' is yours anyway.... Sounds way Jurassic Park to me haha. The whole "Life wants to.." bit -= I know you know what I mean haha.

DMT

fuck! I can't even find where I wrote that, I mean, I know I did, I thought it had a nice ring, but i want to read thur all my posts and see where my arguments disassociate, but I've been back anf forth thru this stupid thread, and damned if I can find it...wanna link it for me?

Nah, I don't really care mate. Just passin time.

How's this... YOU WIN.

Cheers
DMT


marc801


Aug 7, 2009, 6:46 PM
Post #348 of 357 (3158 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dingus wrote:
How's this... YOU WIN.
I don't know that he's won. All he did was take a nice growing thread about a rant and devolve it into self-indulgent philosophy 101 masturbation that should embarrass any college freshman.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #349 of 357 (3121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [marc801] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
dingus wrote:
How's this... YOU WIN.
I don't know that he's won. All he did was take a nice growing thread about a rant and devolve it into self-indulgent philosophy 101 masturbation that should embarrass any college freshman.

Right. And this is rc.com....

any questions?

DMT


wonderwoman


Aug 7, 2009, 8:59 PM
Post #350 of 357 (3119 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I bet you get this all the time, then: 'But Dingus! You are too beautiful! You need to have a baby of your own!' Sly

Dingus wrote:
Just asking, not provoking. But it seems to me we enable our questioners with details that in turns provokes their curiousity. Its one of the reasons I do not talk about climbing at work, for example. it IS none of their business and I work to keep it that way.


I think it's probably easier avoid talking about climbing at work than it is to not discuss your family. If your coworkers were climbers, you would have that in common and might talk about climbing just a little bit. If your coworkers have families, you would be able to relate to family life and may talk about your kids a little bit. It's probably more likely that your coworkers will ask you how old your kid is rather than where your next climbing destination is.

I do introduce D as my daughter to coworkers. She comes to work with me when she has half days. Lots of people even comment to both of us that we look alike, and we both smile and say thanks. Sometimes they say ‘You’re going to be tall, just like your mom!’.

Usually it's people who work closer with me who ask 'When did you get married? 2005? But isn't your daughter 13?' People start to get perplexed and it's innocent enough, but that's usually when the 'step' relation is revealed. People sometimes ask really crazy questions, and boy, do I have some stories that you would not believe (or maybe you would). I don't answer the crazy ones!

If you have advice on how to field these questions, I'd be open to hearing some. I don't tell someone it's none of their business when I got married or what grade my daughter is going into next year. That's a friendly normal okay question to ask. But when it comes to the make up of my family or asking me why I don't want to have a baby 'of my own' - I politely tell people that I would rather not answer those questions.

But I really don't understand why people want other people to have babies. Kids are wonderful, and the world is full of some that are already here and need parents. You don't need to breed to actually have one.


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 9:05 PM
Post #351 of 357 (1956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I bet you get this all the time, then: 'But Dingus! You are too beautiful! You need to have a baby of your own!' Sly

How did you know?

Actually this is what I get...

"Dingus THEY'RE BEAUTIFUL! Are you SURE they are yours? REALLY???????!!!!!!1111111"

Should I be insulted?

(I'll read the rest of your post seperately WW)

DMT


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 9:11 PM
Post #352 of 357 (1952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Advice? On social mores, from ME???

Ahem.

I guess on the one hand I understand your quest for privacy.

But on the other hand I guess I really don't see the harm nor do I understand, truly understand, why you take offence over innocent questions like that.

Oh intellectually I do get it - but emotionally I do not.

Example: I asked my brother's wife if they were going to have another kid. No answer and my mom blanched and later told me she CAN'T HAVE any more kids.

Now I guess I'm supposed to be embarrassed? WEll I'm not. She didn't tell me and I'll be damned if I am going to allow myself to feel shame to compensate for her restricted emotions over an innocent q.

Now I won't go asking her again mind you. But I don't get the whole 'upset' behind innocent questions. And clearly a lot of people don't get step children (at least you have legal standing my dear...).

The preacher man was very surprised when my brown skinned NOT daughter introduced me as My Papa. I let him revel in his curiousity and confusion - I could see it on his brow and I enjoyed in letting it simmer hehe.

DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Aug 7, 2009, 9:36 PM)


wonderwoman


Aug 7, 2009, 11:37 PM
Post #353 of 357 (1918 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [dingus] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yikes! I just posted this as Josh a few minutes ago! He's an iPhone stealer!

I'm sure your sister-in-law understands & appreciates you only asking her once. For some reason I get asked by the same people numerous times. No means no! But I'm certainly not mean to someone who asks.

You can't really control or predict what people are going to ask you. But you can nicely inform them of where your boundaries are.

My reaction probably has a lot to do with my parents wanting me to get married & have kids right out of high school rather than going to school & getting a career. I'm such a disappointment!


dingus


Aug 7, 2009, 11:43 PM
Post #354 of 357 (1913 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [wonderwoman] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You've never once disappointed me... and you're a MODERATOR (the horror... the horror...)!

No I don't think my sister in law appreciates the least little thing about me hehe.

Just tell em happily - 'what with the genital warts, hepatitis shots and tractor seats I don;t have TIME to have more children!'

I bet they won't ask again after THAT!

DMT


doverhxc


Aug 10, 2009, 4:16 AM
Post #355 of 357 (1872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2009
Posts: 8

Re: [climberguy2011] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Perhaps if your parents had brought you climbing as a kid, you could avoid them now by sending something a little harder than a "sick 5.9 route".


I don't have kids, but I am all for seeing them at the crag, as long as they are properly supervised.


zeke_sf


Aug 11, 2009, 4:27 AM
Post #356 of 357 (1813 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730

Re: [technogeekery] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

technogeekery wrote:
zeke_sf wrote:
I think a solid regimen of illicit drugs should render me sterile by then.

I thought that too, but it doesn't work. And your kids come out strange...

Tongue

Oh, my friend, you cheese-titted the shit out of that quote. Them's Nilcarborundum's words. Also, I'm pretty sure his kids will come out strange no matter what. [whispers]he lives in idaho.[/whispers]


technogeekery


Aug 11, 2009, 7:57 AM
Post #357 of 357 (1795 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2009
Posts: 146

Re: [zeke_sf] Leave your damn kids at home [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

See? Doesn't just affect the kids either...


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook