Forums: Climbing Information: General:
This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed)
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


billcoe_


Aug 3, 2015, 6:23 PM
Post #1 of 238 (77735 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed)
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

As far as achieving the site culture you said that you desired in your first post, I'd say that you have been able to successfully achieve it. The cost is to you and the site, as people were invited to leave via your invitation, and they did. Perhaps you might consider what you really wanted?

Jeff wrote:
Regarding site culture:
There are just a couple of things that are non-negotiable based on who I am as a person and what kind of site I want to be associated with. You can sum most of them up as be friendly, treat people, including women, with respect, don't be a jerk, and treat others how you'd want to be treated. The rockclimbing community tends to be a little rough around the edges, thrill-seeking, rules-pushing, heart-pounding awesomeness. No problems there--I was the kid growing up who drove the town roundabout backwards every so often just to feel like a rebel. But I'm not going to tolerate sexually crude remarks or slamming n00bs. People who want to do those things can go find another site. I haven't seen problems with these things so far, but just wanted to set the ground rules.

and


JimTitt wrote:
JimTitt wrote:
set up a sin-bin where the bad boys can mouth of to each other and we can watch the fun from the sidelines.

Jeff wrote:
Lol. Not really cool with that--I'd like to hit reset on that part of this site's culture.

Overall, the crew here is pretty friendly (and many of you have known each other for years), but occasionally threads disintegrate into drama, and when that happens I'll delete those posts and hand out warnings/time outs. It's going to take a little bit for us to all re-calibrate so I will do my best to over-communicate and give any offenders a reasonable chance to change before perma-banning them. That said, if it becomes clear someone needs to be banned, I won't hesitate to do that.

Disagreement is totally fine (and healthy), being rude and prickly, or personal attacks or crude remarks can go elsewhere. I'm still building my "strike zone" on where the line is, so we'll just see how it goes.

I'm not sure why you would ignore and rebuff a person of Jimtitts stature and intelligence. I find crap like that offensive. You are going to give ME a timeout? I'm 60 years old, have been rockclimbing for 43 years. I own my own business and don't need you to be my mother. You can choose to turn this site around right now. Encourage people to get in there and pitch their BS and spit and argue with each other. Let it roll baby. If someone gets personal and offers up something too far over the line, just quietly delete their comment. Don't F***ing lecture or talk down to them for speaking what they perceive is the truth- nobody here is a child. Except for maybe Sungum, but he's Scottish and growing out of it, plus he's hilariously funny. Heheh.

PS, please don't consider this a snarky post. The conflict/activity and bandying that defined RC.com disappeared, and with it -your customers and the things that made it interesting. This is why, not any other reason. Not back end, not front end, not less climbers, not facebook. I've been here a long time, I'm offering this in a respectful manner -let people have active discourse. Give it a thought.


(This post was edited by billcoe_ on Aug 3, 2015, 6:30 PM)


fitzontherocks


Aug 3, 2015, 7:49 PM
Post #2 of 238 (77711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 11, 2003
Posts: 864

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well said ^. I miss the vibrancy and relevance of the old RC.com. I don't miss some of the ass hat attack mentality some posters had, but they were a small minority and often added needed counterpoint.


iknowfear


Aug 4, 2015, 8:37 AM
Post #3 of 238 (77563 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

-- repost from the other thread ---

Users: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. it's dead, that's what's wrong with it!

Owner: No, no, it's uh,...it's resting.

Users: Look, matey, I know a dead website when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

Owner: No no it's not dead, it's, its restin! Remarkable site, the rc.com, idn'it, ay? Beautiful threads and databases!

Users: The threads and databases don't enter into it. It's stone dead.

Owner: Nononono, no, no! it's resting!

Users: All right then, if it's restin', I'll wake him up! (shouting at the site) 'Ello, Mister rc.com website! I've got a lovely fresh cuttle picture for you if you show...

(owner hits the site)

Owner: There, it moved!

Users: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the site!

Owner: I never!!

Users: Yes, you did!

Owner: I never, never did anything...

Users: (yelling and hitting the cage repeatedly) 'ELLO POLLY!!!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call!

Users: Now that's what I call a dead website.

Owner: No, no.....No, it's stunned!

Users: STUNNED?!?

Owner: Yeah! You stunned him, just as he was wakin' up! climbing sites stun easily, major.

Users: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad enough of this. That website is definitely deceased, and when you purchased it not 'alf a year ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a prolonged redesign.

Users: Look, I took the liberty of examining that website when I got it home, and I discovered the only reason that it had been sitting on its perch in the first place was that the threads had been NAILED there.

[.]

...Users: it's not pinin'! it's passed on! This site is no more! It has ceased to be! it's expired and gone to meet its maker! it's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed it to the perch it'd be pushing up the daisies! Its metabolic processes are now 'istory! it's off the twig! it's kicked the bucket, it's shuffled off its mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-SITE!!


iknowfear


Aug 4, 2015, 8:46 AM
Post #4 of 238 (77558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

By the way,

as of now, it's been more than a month that jeff has logged on to the site, so you might want to send a PM or a Mail, or a call...

http://rockclimbing.com/...m.cgi?username=Jeff;

(copy pasted because i can't be asked to make a screenshot and embed it...)

Forums : Profile : Jeff

Registered: Oct 29, 2013, 4:21 AM
Last Logon: Jun 28, 2015, 3:16 AM
Posts: 173 (0.3 per day)
Local Time: Aug 4, 2015, 4:44 AM


(This post was edited by iknowfear on Aug 4, 2015, 11:45 AM)


billcoe_


Aug 4, 2015, 2:43 PM
Post #5 of 238 (77516 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 4, 2015, 4:05 PM
Post #6 of 238 (77489 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic


iknowfear


Aug 4, 2015, 10:52 PM
Post #7 of 238 (77441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(


iknowfear


Aug 4, 2015, 10:54 PM
Post #8 of 238 (77439 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

cheers, I'm glad you liked it.

it looks like jeffs last action was to lock the other thread, although, the forum software being buggy as it is, he could be logged on right now, and the last logon date is wrong. I would not hold my breath for a reply, though...


(This post was edited by iknowfear on Aug 4, 2015, 11:00 PM)


billcoe_


Aug 5, 2015, 4:19 AM
Post #9 of 238 (77398 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic


OK, just admit that you didn't read a damned word of my original post maybe past the title and I might step up and start talkin'.

Or knott.

Maybe I need to copy paste my own post so as to have it read? Shakes head.


roadstead


Aug 5, 2015, 1:22 PM
Post #10 of 238 (77334 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: 248

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic


OK, just admit that you didn't read a damned word of my original post maybe past the title and I might step up and start talkin'.

Or knott.

Maybe I need to copy paste my own post so as to have it read? Shakes head.

Quick get the Paddles....it's not dead yet! I think its still breathing,

or is this just a death gasp.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2015, 3:35 PM
Post #11 of 238 (77312 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic


OK, just admit that you didn't read a damned word of my original post maybe past the title and I might step up and start talkin'.

Or knott.

Maybe I need to copy paste my own post so as to have it read? Shakes head.

Your original post was addressed to Jeff. Who is probably not going to read it soon. And probably won't try to further justify his previous actions, if/when he reads it.

Nobody else can do it (or wants to), in Jeff's stead.

But you want to yell at someone, or argue with someone, anyway. And I responded... so now you're going to yell at me? It's O.K., I understand, I have teenagers at home.

yelling is a good way to vent some excess frustration. Keep on, please!


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2015, 3:39 PM
Post #12 of 238 (77310 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2015, 3:42 PM
Post #13 of 238 (77307 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [roadstead] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

roadstead wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic


OK, just admit that you didn't read a damned word of my original post maybe past the title and I might step up and start talkin'.

Or knott.

Maybe I need to copy paste my own post so as to have it read? Shakes head.

Quick get the Paddles....it's not dead yet! I think its still breathing,

or is this just a death gasp.
It's a heavy handed attempt at resuscitation. Rib-breaking CPR, and all.


theguy


Aug 5, 2015, 5:59 PM
Post #14 of 238 (77278 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Evidently there's some demand this site satisfies which others don't, or people wouldn't keep remarking on its passing or calling for its resuscitation; that demand may just be nostalgia, old bookmarks and an unwillingness to let go. The good news it seems we've reached the bargaining stage of the five stages of loss, so only two more to go to acceptance.

While from a forum participant perspective this site may appear to be dead, from an owner perspective it's doing great and they're focusing on the right things if compete.com stats are anything to go by: unique visitors this summer are 3-4x greater than last year. Rockclimbing.com is in the top 3 non-news/non-local google results for "rock climbing", an impressive feat for a mobile unfriendly site in a post-mobilegeddon world; MountainProject and SuperTopo don't make the first three pages.

When it comes to rebuilding the site, the job is getting increasingly difficult. The number of mobile-only adult internet users exceeded the number of desktop-only internet users this year; addressing mobile is going to require more than new forum software.


billcoe_


Aug 5, 2015, 6:41 PM
Post #15 of 238 (77260 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
But you want to yell at someone, or argue with someone, anyway. And I responded... so now you're going to yell at me? It's O.K., I understand, I have teenagers at home.
Haha! "I have Teenagers at home"..LOL. Thanks for that.

Well it bought Dave (Roadstead) out of hibernation, he's even older than me!! Hola Dave!!! Long long time. Teenagers, heh. Hey, my son texts me, "I'm coming home dad, do you have 70meter rope?" I replied "I'll check". Go find a brand new one hucked it on the bed he'd be saying in during the visit. It turns out that he's bringing me a 70M rope. He's been doing your guys new routes in Hells canyon and if you don't have a 70 you are hanging in space. So he got a prodeal on a 70M rope and remembered his father!!!

Anyway, I haven't been to Hell yet, not much of a bolt clipper, but probably will get over there at some point. Thanks for putting in some kick ass routes!


Iknowfear: any pictures of spiders? I can tell you my Funnel Web Spider story while climbing in Australia. No photos but from Wiki: "Australian funnel-webs are one of the most dangerous groups of spiders in the world and are regarded by some to be the most deadly, both in terms of clinical cases and venom toxicity"


(This post was edited by billcoe_ on Aug 5, 2015, 6:46 PM)


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 5, 2015, 8:49 PM
Post #16 of 238 (77225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
But you want to yell at someone, or argue with someone, anyway. And I responded... so now you're going to yell at me? It's O.K., I understand, I have teenagers at home.
Haha! "I have Teenagers at home"..LOL. Thanks for that.

You are welcome. See, you might not believe it, but I DID read your first post, and I do know how old (approximately) you are. But even guys in their prime (hehe!) can act like teenagers.



billcoe_ wrote:
Iknowfear: any pictures of spiders? I can tell you my Funnel Web Spider story while climbing in Australia. No photos but from Wiki: "Australian funnel-webs are one of the most dangerous groups of spiders in the world and are regarded by some to be the most deadly, both in terms of clinical cases and venom toxicity"

Note to self: put Australia further down on my have-to-climb-it list. It won't be so sad if I die from a spider bite at a more mature age.


Rokjox


Aug 5, 2015, 9:08 PM
Post #17 of 238 (77221 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bill has it right, its a dead site, with a few worms and some gas making the corpse twitch. This thread is a meta thread, a thread about posting threads not about making climbing posts. We are like Angels overlooking the casket.

Yes, the new owner has now re calibrated his site. This is what Absolute Zero looks like; or as close to is as stochastic noise allows.

He got what he asked for, a site without chaos, bitchen, bitch slapping, ripping, lying and threats of any sort. No disrespect here either. No fucking nuthing.

So you now have your calibration. A climbing site that welcomes Rokjox and those others who seem to have a attitude and a reputation and people who dislike them maybe, too. A site with a SHITLOAD of posts and replies, a barroom battle every day and a big return, a site vibrant with discord and making a lot of clicks;

or a drop dead quiet site no-one is interested in except obsessive-compulsive fist fighting old mountaineers, like me. A site even I can get nothing out of, it just that the obsessive/compulsive thing means that I tune in on the barest CHANCE something has changed, that someone has responded to something I wrote perhaps. Not that there is a real turn of the wheel, that the wind may have changed something.

Check Alexis for the rank. RC is dead and I would post the BLANK CHARK that represents Superstupids popularity now. RC is running on its prior reputation, it had a lot of airspeed and altitude once. Now it doesn't, its almost hitting the ground... ""So FAR so GOOD, EH?!!" the moron muttered as the plane dove into the ice"

I post it, but you can't post an image here anymore, still, right? Too cheap to put up the server space?? Hope you get done calibrating this dump before irreparable brain death sets in. You think this thing will just sit in a frozen hell waiting on you to get out of the hibernation tank?

You COULD HIRE some actual expertize. Not everyone that climbs are idiots, some are programmers. Better ones than you. With a little kissing up to your base, that bigass database that is, you might be able to get some worthwile shit done, AND in this decade.

Truth is, damn few owners are as smart as they say, most fatcats depend on the skills of others and a ruthless exploitation of blind luck. Ask the Donald.

Did he make his money by building shit with a hammer or by kissing people and getting them to do shit FOR him for less than the results were worth? Does he know what a hammer is?

Can you understand standard white street English? Or is this racist, demeaning to you and an nu-necesarily combative troll? Answer wrong and blow this joint off.

So hows that "Calibration" doing ya?


P.S. I'm 60 ...err... and I got 43 years of climbing in, too. I'm not the b...er twitchy tween kid you seem to think posts on a climbing site. But if you want nothing BUT climbing posts, you will get nothing. Again.
More.
Nothing.

Its lonely at the top. Its fucking DEAD at the bottom.

Alexis says that Supertopo, a plane crash in progress, lost 185 ranking places in the last 3 months... almost level.

Rockclimbing.com lost 16.500 places.
Steep dive into obscurity. No purpose, no energy.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Aug 6, 2015, 12:20 AM)


sungam


Aug 6, 2015, 8:56 AM
Post #18 of 238 (77112 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Spiders are p. much the entire reason I never want to climb in Australia.

Spiders are sp00ky.


iknowfear


Aug 6, 2015, 9:02 AM
Post #19 of 238 (77109 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
But you want to yell at someone, or argue with someone, anyway. And I responded... so now you're going to yell at me? It's O.K., I understand, I have teenagers at home.
Haha! "I have Teenagers at home"..LOL. Thanks for that.

Well it bought Dave (Roadstead) out of hibernation, he's even older than me!! Hola Dave!!! Long long time. Teenagers, heh. Hey, my son texts me, "I'm coming home dad, do you have 70meter rope?" I replied "I'll check". Go find a brand new one hucked it on the bed he'd be saying in during the visit. It turns out that he's bringing me a 70M rope. He's been doing your guys new routes in Hells canyon and if you don't have a 70 you are hanging in space. So he got a prodeal on a 70M rope and remembered his father!!!

Anyway, I haven't been to Hell yet, not much of a bolt clipper, but probably will get over there at some point. Thanks for putting in some kick ass routes!


Iknowfear: any pictures of spiders? I can tell you my Funnel Web Spider story while climbing in Australia. No photos but from Wiki: "Australian funnel-webs are one of the most dangerous groups of spiders in the world and are regarded by some to be the most deadly, both in terms of clinical cases and venom toxicity"

incidentally, while climbing I commented to my buddy: boy am I glad this is not australia. over here, spiders don't bite...

but please, tell the story


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 6, 2015, 2:35 PM
Post #20 of 238 (77037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [theguy] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

theguy wrote:
Evidently there's some demand this site satisfies which others don't, or people wouldn't keep remarking on its passing or calling for its resuscitation; that demand may just be nostalgia, old bookmarks and an unwillingness to let go. The good news it seems we've reached the bargaining stage of the five stages of loss, so only two more to go to acceptance.

While from a forum participant perspective this site may appear to be dead, from an owner perspective it's doing great and they're focusing on the right things if compete.com stats are anything to go by: unique visitors this summer are 3-4x greater than last year. Rockclimbing.com is in the top 3 non-news/non-local google results for "rock climbing", an impressive feat for a mobile unfriendly site in a post-mobilegeddon world; MountainProject and SuperTopo don't make the first three pages.

When it comes to rebuilding the site, the job is getting increasingly difficult. The number of mobile-only adult internet users exceeded the number of desktop-only internet users this year; addressing mobile is going to require more than new forum software.

The name (rockclimbing.com) certainly helps get the first-time visitors who are interested in climbing and are starting from zero. You have to already know something to click on supertopo or Mountain Project links, if they appear in search, but rockclimbing.com? Seems like a no-brainer.

But a better uestion is, after they looked at RC.com once, are they coming back? And the answer is, rather unlikely, right now.


wonderwoman


Aug 6, 2015, 2:42 PM
Post #21 of 238 (77036 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I stopped posting and lost interest when the crap posts started outnumbering the posts with actual climbing content. Geez. I think this is my first post in over a year, even.

I am still climbing - and climbing harder than ever before. I communicate with other climbers via facebook.

Maybe forums are a thing of the past. Maybe those of you who miss the former RC.com culture can connect with one another on some other form of social media.

I do not have high hopes of an RC.com comeback, regardless of what jeff does with the site. You know what they say - you can't polish a turd.


roadstead


Aug 6, 2015, 4:55 PM
Post #22 of 238 (76998 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: 248

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
Well it bought Dave (Roadstead) out of hibernation,

Like other long time user's that appear to be concerned...in our very own Crazy way.

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...name=fitzontherocks;
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...?username=iknowfear;
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...cgi?username=theguy;
http://www.rockclimbing.com/....cgi?username=Rokjox
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...sername=wonderwoman;
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...username=lena_chita;
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...cgi?username=sungam;

wonderwoman might have said it best
wonderwoman wrote:
- you can't polish a turd.
or can you?

Add your name to the list by bumping this thread back to the top. Maybe we can pump a little life back in the old RC.com. Wink

billco,
You need to go to Hell!!


markc


Aug 6, 2015, 6:28 PM
Post #23 of 238 (76982 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

The other weekend I took the kids (3.5 and nearly 9) out toproping at Coopers Rock in WV. The confidence the 9-year-old has bouldering in the gym hasn't translated into roped climbing at the crag. I rigged a couple of the easier climbs and he just wasn't super into it. The younger kid wants to hold the rope rather than the rock, with predicable results. Still, we were out in the woods, I got to climb a tiny bit, and we managed to find okay Chinese food on the way home.

I also realized that all of my slings are probably 14-15 years old, so the credit card got a little exercise, too. Next I get to send off cams to be reslung, in the hopes that I can dust off the rack soon. The mountain bike has been seeing more use than the climbing gear.


Partner Jeff
Owner

Aug 7, 2015, 8:21 AM
Post #24 of 238 (76873 views)
Shortcut

 
Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.


ncrockclimber


Aug 9, 2015, 5:04 AM
Post #25 of 238 (76665 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2006
Posts: 286

Re: [Jeff] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.


sungam


Aug 9, 2015, 8:58 AM
Post #26 of 238 (23152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ptftw's are not dead


granite_grrl


Aug 10, 2015, 12:45 PM
Post #27 of 238 (23093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic


sungam


Aug 10, 2015, 2:55 PM
Post #28 of 238 (23074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [granite_grrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic
I have OTHER ROUTES AND/OR DESTINATIONS for routes like thatAngelic


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 10, 2015, 3:51 PM
Post #29 of 238 (23067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [wonderwoman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

wonderwoman wrote:
I stopped posting and lost interest when the crap posts started outnumbering the posts with actual climbing content. Geez. I think this is my first post in over a year, even.

I am still climbing - and climbing harder than ever before. I communicate with other climbers via facebook.

Maybe forums are a thing of the past. Maybe those of you who miss the former RC.com culture can connect with one another on some other form of social media.

I do not have high hopes of an RC.com comeback, regardless of what jeff does with the site. You know what they say - you can't polish a turd.

I wouldn't call it a turd, and whatever RC needs, it is not polishing.

But I agree, this seems to be the way a lot of forums are going, not unique to RC by any means...

Good pics from the Squamish trip, btw!


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 10, 2015, 3:53 PM
Post #30 of 238 (23066 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [granite_grrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic

Great idea, I should get one, too! Tongue


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 10, 2015, 4:00 PM
Post #31 of 238 (23062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [markc] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

The other weekend I took the kids (3.5 and nearly 9) out toproping at Coopers Rock in WV. The confidence the 9-year-old has bouldering in the gym hasn't translated into roped climbing at the crag. I rigged a couple of the easier climbs and he just wasn't super into it. The younger kid wants to hold the rope rather than the rock, with predicable results. Still, we were out in the woods, I got to climb a tiny bit, and we managed to find okay Chinese food on the way home.

I also realized that all of my slings are probably 14-15 years old, so the credit card got a little exercise, too. Next I get to send off cams to be reslung, in the hopes that I can dust off the rack soon. The mountain bike has been seeing more use than the climbing gear.

I didn't realize that you are close to Coopers! I haven't been there for couple years. Between my knee surgery, and my boyfriend breaking an ankle and the opposite knee in a bouldering comp, and then breaking the other ankle when a random belayer gave him a hard catch... bouldering has been on the back burner.

Anyway, it's cool that your kids are enjoying climbing. Hopefully the trend continues. I am not sure my younger one would ever come back to climbing (her outdoor bouldering has been all at Coopers, incidentally). These days she goes to the gym with me maybe twice a year. Enjoys it a lot, and damn, she is good, if she were climbing regularly, she'd be really good... But then she always says, yeah, but I like gymnastics more. if I stop doing gymnastics some day, maybe I'll start climbing some more.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 10, 2015, 4:03 PM
Post #32 of 238 (23063 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

I am confused, too. I wonder if someone locked it accidentally without even realizing that they did? It is theoretically possible.

But that thread being locked started this one, and unlocking it now would be rather pointless... so yeah, shrug.


wonderwoman


Aug 10, 2015, 4:04 PM
Post #33 of 238 (23062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ncrockclimber wrote:
Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

This sort of thing is partially why I quit moderating. There used to be clear communication in a hidden 'green room' to build moderator consensus before locking a thread. There used to also be transparency, such as 'This post locked by wonderwoman for reason x, y and z' as the last post before locking a thread. The internal conversations stopped at some point.


granite_grrl


Aug 10, 2015, 5:49 PM
Post #34 of 238 (23050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic

Great idea, I should get one, too! Tongue

Husbands are over rated. Try to get a draw monkey with no strings attached.


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 10, 2015, 6:57 PM
Post #35 of 238 (23033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [granite_grrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic

Great idea, I should get one, too! Tongue

Husbands are over rated. Try to get a draw monkey with no strings attached.

But... what do I pull, in order for the draw monkey to do what i want, if there are no strings attached? Tongue


curt


Aug 11, 2015, 12:08 AM
Post #36 of 238 (23003 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
...As far as achieving the site culture you said that you desired in your first post, I'd say that you have been able to successfully achieve it. The cost is to you and the site, as people were invited to leave via your invitation, and they did. Perhaps you might consider what you really wanted?

I'd say Jeff got exactly what he wanted. No more troublesome people to actually contribute interesting content to the site and, as others have pointed out, unique site visitors up 3 to 4 times versus last year. The best of both worlds for an owner.

Curt


ubu


Aug 11, 2015, 11:47 AM
Post #37 of 238 (22957 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
...As far as achieving the site culture you said that you desired in your first post, I'd say that you have been able to successfully achieve it. The cost is to you and the site, as people were invited to leave via your invitation, and they did. Perhaps you might consider what you really wanted?

I'd say Jeff got exactly what he wanted. No more troublesome people to actually contribute interesting content to the site and, as others have pointed out, unique site visitors up 3 to 4 times versus last year. The best of both worlds for an owner.

Curt

I hope Jeff enjoys it while it lasts. No new content = no sustainability.


sungam


Aug 11, 2015, 12:16 PM
Post #38 of 238 (22949 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:

I have a husband

Great idea, I should get one, too! Tongue
sup


sungam


Aug 11, 2015, 12:16 PM
Post #39 of 238 (22948 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:

Nice Python reference! Are you suggesting Jeff logged on, locked the "This is DEAD!" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC And then left?

Whoah........OK then.

Yes, pretty much. Jeff has other things on his plate, site updating is more difficult, time-consuming, and confusing than he anticipated.

So, changes to this website might happen, but slowly, and with uncertain time table.

Is this place still worth something to you? Then to hell with the outdated forum layout. Just start talking.

Want to turn this into a new active thread? O.K., it is Tuesday, what are you up to? Angelic

Just got back from climbing. A small 15 m Cliff, but with a 2 min approach (useful with current forecast). Aptly named Spinnenfels; everything was full (!) of spiderwebs. I think that climbing there would cure people of arachnaphobia as you HAD to reach through the web for the holds.

The routes itself were ok... one notices that it gets darker earlier again :-(

I've climbed couple routes like that (spider-infested), but it seemed to have an opposite effect on me. There was one spider... I swear, I HEARD the "thunk" sound it made after it hit the ground from 50 feet up!

I have a husband/draw monkey for routes like that. Angelic

Great idea, I should get one, too! Tongue

Husbands are over rated. Try to get a draw monkey with no strings attached.

But... what do I pull, in order for the draw monkey to do what i want, if there are no strings attached? Tongue



Partner macherry


Aug 11, 2015, 6:03 PM
Post #40 of 238 (22907 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
...As far as achieving the site culture you said that you desired in your first post, I'd say that you have been able to successfully achieve it. The cost is to you and the site, as people were invited to leave via your invitation, and they did. Perhaps you might consider what you really wanted?

I'd say Jeff got exactly what he wanted. No more troublesome people to actually contribute interesting content to the site and, as others have pointed out, unique site visitors up 3 to 4 times versus last year. The best of both worlds for an owner.

Curt

you pretty much nailed it curt. i do believe, however, that the site was on a downward slide before the purchase. inattentive owners before jeff helped paved the way. Add in other social media sites where people could connect on a more personal level without restrictions and users leave.

i think some users thought jeff would be the savior, get the site revived.

it's a good domain names, creating traffic, but i don't think they community vibe of rc.com will come back.


billcoe_


Aug 11, 2015, 8:55 PM
Post #41 of 238 (22878 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [roadstead] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roadstead wrote:
Add your name to the list by bumping this thread back to the top. Maybe we can pump a little life back in the old RC.com. Wink

Bumping and Pumping here:-) Jeff, good to hear it wasn't you. [confused] I'd suggest that you check in with whomever it was that killed the most interesting active thread on the site and have a short discourse on your expectations though.

In reply to:
billco,
You need to go to Hell!!

Haha!!! I sure as hell do Dave. Last time I saw you was in Yosemite I think. My boy just came through town and was soliciting me to spend 3 weeks in Yosemite "hey dad get in shape lets climb Astroman". Uhhh, right son. I was panting like a dog just thinking about the valley with my son. I get to work all stoked, check the company calender and everyone else has vacation during that time period. Crap.




Lena - glad you are feeling better, maybe we need to have an old persons campfire wherein we all sit and bitch on our medical and health issues. I'll go first....err, second. Just wrapping up my 2nd shoulder surgery recovery (this was the right shoulder, I didn't even bother asking what was wrong with it). The surgery didn't go well, was climbing just yesterday and it still hurts but now I get occasional steroid shots in the joint. JUICE ME DOC!!!

The left shoulder was stitched up first and I had asked what was wrong with that one.


3 years before this picture, I'd slipped hiking and screwed up both shoulders. Tryed to let nature fix them. (bad idea) Couple of days before this picture, we had climbed 26 or 28 pitches that day (pain). In this shot, I could tell things were going from bad to worse as I was running P2 and p3 together. It was hurting so bad at the top of the pitch everytime I reached over my head....like a lot, and seemed to be getting worse. When we woke up I asked buddy if he wanted to lead the rest as I felt I could still jug if I kept my arms low, or if bailing was OK- thank the dear lord he said we could bail.

According to the left shoulder MRI when I got back, my suprispinatius was torn most of the way through -was hanging by a few threads, my infraspinatus tendon was half way torn through, I had a torn labrum, in the surgery they ground down the collar bone and also stitched the bicep tendon which was screwed up for some reason I was never clear about. Turned out I also had artritus and they cut out a lot of my shoulder artritus (it shows up white on an MRI they said) while they were in there.

Don't go climbing without Ibuprofen is the message :-)


lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 12, 2015, 2:58 PM
Post #42 of 238 (22819 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
roadstead wrote:
Add your name to the list by bumping this thread back to the top. Maybe we can pump a little life back in the old RC.com. Wink

Bumping and Pumping here:-) Jeff, good to hear it wasn't you. [confused] I'd suggest that you check in with whomever it was that killed the most interesting active thread on the site and have a short discourse on your expectations though.

In reply to:
billco,
You need to go to Hell!!

Haha!!! I sure as hell do Dave. Last time I saw you was in Yosemite I think. My boy just came through town and was soliciting me to spend 3 weeks in Yosemite "hey dad get in shape lets climb Astroman". Uhhh, right son. I was panting like a dog just thinking about the valley with my son. I get to work all stoked, check the company calender and everyone else has vacation during that time period. Crap.




Lena - glad you are feeling better, maybe we need to have an old persons campfire wherein we all sit and bitch on our medical and health issues. I'll go first....err, second. Just wrapping up my 2nd shoulder surgery recovery (this was the right shoulder, I didn't even bother asking what was wrong with it). The surgery didn't go well, was climbing just yesterday and it still hurts but now I get occasional steroid shots in the joint. JUICE ME DOC!!!

The left shoulder was stitched up first and I had asked what was wrong with that one.


3 years before this picture, I'd slipped hiking and screwed up both shoulders. Tryed to let nature fix them. (bad idea) Couple of days before this picture, we had climbed 26 or 28 pitches that day (pain). In this shot, I could tell things were going from bad to worse as I was running P2 and p3 together. It was hurting so bad at the top of the pitch everytime I reached over my head....like a lot, and seemed to be getting worse. When we woke up I asked buddy if he wanted to lead the rest as I felt I could still jug if I kept my arms low, or if bailing was OK- thank the dear lord he said we could bail.

According to the left shoulder MRI when I got back, my suprispinatius was torn most of the way through -was hanging by a few threads, my infraspinatus tendon was half way torn through, I had a torn labrum, in the surgery they ground down the collar bone and also stitched the bicep tendon which was screwed up for some reason I was never clear about. Turned out I also had artritus and they cut out a lot of my shoulder artritus (it shows up white on an MRI they said) while they were in there.

Don't go climbing without Ibuprofen is the message :-)

Aren't surgeries fun? Crazy Sorry to hear your 2nd shoulder didn't recover well. Give it more time, maybe?

I was really frustrated with the knee surgery for a long while. Dr. said 3 months recovery, but what he meant was 3 months until I can walk, go up-down-stairs, and sit at work all day. I kept pressing him about climbing, but I guess, like most doctors, he was thinking climbing as in, walking up the mountains, and so he said, 3-4 months, no problem.

6 months post- surgery, I was still griping to my PT friend about how my knee was worth crap now, and how I couldn't do anything I actually needed to do. And she kept telling me, one year. It will take at least one year before your knee is recovered in YOUR sense of what recovery means.

We disagreed about what is considered "recovery", in terms of knee function. You'd be surprised, by I have it on good authority now, that being able to do 1 legged squats, and jumping down from 10-12 feet high are not considered normal! Who knew!!!! Tongue That's crazy-talk!!!

But anyway, exactly one year to the date, while in WY, I tried doing a one-legged squat again. And my knee finally, finally obliged. Long uphill hikes with backpack is a great form of PT.


Ibuprofen is permanently residing in my climbing pack. Though thankfully it is usually it's not for me, it's other people who make sad faces and ask if anyone around them have ibuprofen. And oh yes, you are not the only one who climbed until a day before surgery...


Partner happiegrrrl


Aug 13, 2015, 9:32 PM
Post #43 of 238 (22716 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

If people want there to be content on the site, then do something about it rather than expect it to magically appear. Make a thread(I added one), and tend to it a bit if needed. Add a new photo or two.


rocknice2


Aug 14, 2015, 11:42 AM
Post #44 of 238 (22678 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2006
Posts: 1221

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post




yanqui


Aug 21, 2015, 2:10 PM
Post #45 of 238 (22458 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [roadstead] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

roadstead wrote:

Add your name to the list by bumping this thread back to the top. Maybe we can pump a little life back in the old RC.com. Wink

OK


yanqui


Aug 21, 2015, 2:13 PM
Post #46 of 238 (22456 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 1559

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
Add a new photo or two.

Last weekend on the hill behind my house




lena_chita
Moderator

Aug 21, 2015, 6:16 PM
Post #47 of 238 (22423 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [yanqui] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

yanqui wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
Add a new photo or two.

Last weekend on the hill behind my house


nice backyard! :)


iknowfear


Aug 21, 2015, 11:28 PM
Post #48 of 238 (22404 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [rocknice2] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rocknice2 wrote:

this site used to be:




mikebarter387


Sep 4, 2015, 5:23 PM
Post #49 of 238 (22131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 21, 2007
Posts: 237

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

My Space of Climbing Forums. Seen this before with "Live the Vision"


stevecurtis


Sep 4, 2015, 8:20 PM
Post #50 of 238 (22124 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 9, 2007
Posts: 41

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Pretty snotty title.


moose_droppings


Sep 5, 2015, 4:05 AM
Post #51 of 238 (26103 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [stevecurtis] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Snot is the grease that lubes the channels of communications.


Works well IMO.
Wink


marc801


Sep 5, 2015, 2:33 PM
Post #52 of 238 (26089 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [moose_droppings] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

moose_droppings wrote:
Snot is the grease that lubes the channels of communications.]
I thought it was snark?


moose_droppings


Sep 5, 2015, 10:38 PM
Post #53 of 238 (26065 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [marc801] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Snark works great, when well lubed with snot.

[


Partner wideguy


Sep 23, 2015, 7:39 PM
Post #54 of 238 (25855 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 15045

Re: [moose_droppings] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just wanted to be included. I have nothing to add.


billcoe_


Sep 30, 2015, 3:09 AM
Post #55 of 238 (25725 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [stevecurtis] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

stevecurtis wrote:
Pretty snotty title.

Agreed, I copy/pasted the the title exactly as the other earlier one that was whacked/killed by an unnamed moderator. For no apparent reason. Go to this link: http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._latest_reply;so=ASC So then you agree that the first amendment sucks and nobody really needs nor should have free speech? Good for you. Got any climbing pictures? If not, STFU and stop being a douchbag.
______________________________________________

This is for the solid dude Dave Stephans. Dave, we are picking the plums from your backyard haha. This 1200' now 1/2 way climbed face is getting done for the first time. Not as many bolts as Hells canyon, but a shitload for sure anyway. My piss poor shoulders and attitude notwithstanding, hope to get it finished next year, gonna close out this year as the rain/cold is about here and the deer and elk hunters certainly are - good times. Route is now right at the top of the photo and to the left of the roofs at that fur patch. Last trip up, a squirrel suitor about to jump chose to pitch a rock over to clear the launch spot. Oh, he yelled "rock", and oh, it whacked me in the chest for sure:-0 Had my helmet too high up, it was on my head.




____________________________________________________


wideguy wrote:
I just wanted to be included. I have nothing to add.

Haha. Nice pitch! Welcome aboard, you got more than most of us and in fact, most assuredly more substance and interesting way to say it than that whining douchbag up there complaining about the title^^^^LOL. Any climbing shots?


climbingtrash


Oct 3, 2015, 3:32 PM
Post #56 of 238 (25622 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo


sungam


Oct 7, 2015, 3:49 AM
Post #57 of 238 (25456 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?


6pacfershur


Oct 9, 2015, 3:57 AM
Post #58 of 238 (25364 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2010
Posts: 254

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

WOW! this thread sure has resurrected some old-timers.....
er, what was the question?


climbingtrash


Oct 9, 2015, 12:53 PM
Post #59 of 238 (25349 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?

Sure, I'll 2 to 1 yore arse up a root. Where on teh landmass are ewe?


sungam


Oct 9, 2015, 8:54 PM
Post #60 of 238 (25328 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
ptftw's are not dead

iz troo
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Now that we live on the same landmass are we going to climb a rock?

Sure, I'll 2 to 1 yore arse up a root. Where on teh landmass are ewe?
C A L I B O I S


climbingtrash


Oct 9, 2015, 9:02 PM
Post #61 of 238 (25325 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Post deleted by climbingtrash [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

 


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 9, 2015, 9:06 PM
Post #62 of 238 (25324 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105

This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.


sungam


Oct 11, 2015, 8:32 PM
Post #63 of 238 (25219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.
Wow, I almost forgot your fabulous profile piccy existed m8

Wonderous. Majestic. Arousing. 11/10.


wonderwoman


Oct 13, 2015, 5:14 PM
Post #64 of 238 (25132 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.

But aren't you the king moderator?


Partner taualum23


Oct 16, 2015, 5:40 PM
Post #65 of 238 (24964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 2370

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

philbox wrote:
This thread even brought me out of retirement to add a drive by post shooting.

Funny, I was about to say nearly the same thing. I came by to see if anyone wanted to climb with me on Saturday, but dayum...this place is dead, huh? Somebody should start a thread about that.


epicsaga


Oct 22, 2015, 6:25 PM
Post #66 of 238 (24753 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2003
Posts: 226

Re: [taualum23] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

RC.com has been as much a scandal rant troll site as supertopo for a decade. Mountainproject won.


sungam


Oct 22, 2015, 7:59 PM
Post #67 of 238 (24745 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [epicsaga] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

epicsaga wrote:
RC.com has been as much a scandal rant troll site as supertopo for a decade. Mountainproject won.
Actually I am p. sure reddit won((


Samaran


Oct 29, 2015, 6:34 AM
Post #68 of 238 (24517 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 26, 2015
Posts: 1

Re: [roadstead] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well said ^. I miss the vibrancy and relevance of the old RC.com. I don't miss some of the ass hat attack mentality some posters had, but they were a small minority and often added needed counterpoint.
http://www.sales.care


(This post was edited by Samaran on Nov 9, 2015, 10:32 AM)


Rokjox


Nov 2, 2015, 3:24 AM
Post #69 of 238 (24428 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [Samaran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

It was a yin/yang that fed the worm oroboros. but another thing that has killed it is how damn risky all this social media shee is.

People are leaving the SM or transferring to footbook the giant that eats all, the wallmart of the social self publishers. Snow white and the 7 dwarves sites.

There can only be one.

But the risk thisng is unreal. DAmn a lot of nuts in the sport, guys who want control for money. Making it, taking it. Then there are the stalkers, guys who hate what you say, no matter which side you are on, you will piss off somebody, and the wound is there in print forever.


Nobody respects the avatar as a gentlemans veil, the ficticious psuedonym that would allow people to explore TWO sides, make two arguments even for just the cause of exploring the argument. Someone has to take the less popular side, in debates the counter and the direct argument are assigned. No chpoise. Dont argue a conservative point here, you are going be lonely. The liberal perfume is still strong. But some guys will PUNISH you for honesty, much less devoious behavious.

Its like a snake or a crocodile, you can't tell if its dead, it can still bite in an instant after sitting motionless for days. Who can risk posting in an environment like this? 5 years after you post something, somebody decides you said something wrong and need to be punished?

I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.

And so are you, dear brother climbing zombie posters.


sungam


Nov 2, 2015, 3:33 PM
Post #70 of 238 (24401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.
Embrace the tism - it is as worthy a character trait as any.


jt512


Nov 4, 2015, 4:14 AM
Post #71 of 238 (24268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
It was a yin/yang that fed the worm oroboros. but another thing that has killed it is how damn risky all this social media shee is.

People are leaving the SM or transferring to footbook the giant that eats all, the wallmart of the social self publishers. Snow white and the 7 dwarves sites.

There can only be one.

But the risk thisng is unreal. DAmn a lot of nuts in the sport, guys who want control for money. Making it, taking it. Then there are the stalkers, guys who hate what you say, no matter which side you are on, you will piss off somebody, and the wound is there in print forever.


Nobody respects the avatar as a gentlemans veil, the ficticious psuedonym that would allow people to explore TWO sides, make two arguments even for just the cause of exploring the argument. Someone has to take the less popular side, in debates the counter and the direct argument are assigned. No chpoise. Dont argue a conservative point here, you are going be lonely. The liberal perfume is still strong. But some guys will PUNISH you for honesty, much less devoious behavious.

Its like a snake or a crocodile, you can't tell if its dead, it can still bite in an instant after sitting motionless for days. Who can risk posting in an environment like this? 5 years after you post something, somebody decides you said something wrong and need to be punished?

I'm fucking showing a autistic/compulsive streak for even writing this.

And so are you, dear brother climbing zombie posters.

Hooray for drug-induced ranting! Maybe this place is making a comeback after all.


sungam


Nov 4, 2015, 7:17 PM
Post #72 of 238 (24235 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Hooray for drug-induced ranting! Maybe this place is making a comeback after all.
No, J, off topic, conversational, or comedic posts that do anything to make the forum less like a wiki article are BAD for the forums' activity and is what KILLS websites.

I know this because the mods told me, and clearly they know how to keep a website alive.

ayyyyyy


marc801


Nov 5, 2015, 5:50 PM
Post #73 of 238 (24185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
I know this because the mods told me, and clearly they know how to keep a website alive.
Obviously they and the site owner are taking lessons from the gunks.com site owner.


6pacfershur


Nov 6, 2015, 5:58 AM
Post #74 of 238 (24150 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2010
Posts: 254

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
....... off topic, conversational, or comedic posts that do anything to make the forum less like a wiki article are BAD for the forums' activity and is what KILLS websites.....

so, .... on-topic, serious, one-sided posts that make the forum more like a wiki-article are GOOD for forum activity and NURTURE websites? interesting......


theguy


Nov 9, 2015, 8:41 PM
Post #75 of 238 (24174 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [6pacfershur] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ironic that this is the most lively thread in ages.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Nov 11, 2015, 4:43 PM
Post #76 of 238 (24950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [theguy] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"lively"

Interesting word choice.


majid_sabet


Nov 11, 2015, 6:38 PM
Post #77 of 238 (24941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

we are either older now or wiser or none of the above


theguy


Nov 11, 2015, 7:50 PM
Post #78 of 238 (24933 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [majid_sabet] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
we are either older now or wiser or none of the above

So "all of the above" is right out of the question then? And more importantly, would you bet a daisy-chained core-strand rappel on it? ;)


majid_sabet


Nov 11, 2015, 10:34 PM
Post #79 of 238 (24927 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [philbox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was worried about you


Partner tisar


Nov 12, 2015, 3:59 PM
Post #80 of 238 (24898 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2577

Re: [majid_sabet] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Couldn't believe I missed so little in the last year(s). Just drove by by accident.

Good to see that some of the fellow posters are still alive - so much more than this forum...

Cheers across the big blue bath tub from an aging Eurofreak. Haven't seen much of the bunch in the last five or so years but I know that at least some of them are still in the business.

So just a friendly "Berg Frei" from me and have a nice one!


curt


Nov 17, 2015, 6:36 AM
Post #81 of 238 (24789 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [marc801] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

marc801 wrote:
sungam wrote:
I know this because the mods told me, and clearly they know how to keep a website alive.
Obviously they and the site owner are taking lessons from the gunks.com site owner.
OK, now that is funny.

Curt


Toast_in_the_Machine


Nov 23, 2015, 6:26 PM
Post #82 of 238 (24668 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [Jeff] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As I make a life shift (job related), I am given to thinking more about branding and success of companies. Economically we are used to thinking of zero sum games where one person’s loss is exactly another person’s gain or non-zero sum games where cooperation and competition are possible. Companies aren’t, however, participating in a game where the parties are equally time bound. “Over working” is possible in both the general sense of participating in an activity more and in how I will use it which includes continuous improvement.

Climbing better than a peer is a great example of “over working” as I will use it. The person who trains better and more often will become a better climber. Sure there are other factors that influence the outcome, but at the core more and better practice makes a better climber. Part of the challenge is in the definition of a peer set. If I choose my peer set as middle aged people who live in the flatlands, I’m a fantastic climber because I am one of the few in this situation who climb and I have over worked them at climbing. If I chose the peer set as people who have climbed as long as I have, I am an average to below average climber. Most people who have climbed as long as I have have over worked me in climbing.

Success for a company is about over working. For many startups it involves a compressed timeline to stake out a market position prior to any competition. The over working is facilitated by sharing the risk (stock options) and encouraging a culture where the per-hour wage rate is suppressed due to this shared risk. Family/ethnic restaurants work because there is additional labor (kids, cousins, parents) that is willing to work for little or no money and help over work their peers. Vanity companies started by extremely wealthy individuals have an over work advantage of capital that allows for spending money that peers just don’t have. Once, however, a position is established in the marketplace, over working becomes a difficult proposition. Large investment banks try to create a culture of over working, but since most of their business is already in existing markets, the culture creates a byproduct of illegal activities. You simply can’t over work once a stable state is achieved.

Companies try to shift back to an over work mentality on a regular basis. Corporate restructuring measures which are an effort to over work compared to the other companies in the market. By reducing headcount, there is an inherent short term burst of over working by the remaining employees. However, because the company itself is already in an established market, the gains will always be temporary. The increased wealth created is real, but no one and no organization can exist in an over working state forever.

New ownership is often a way to get into a new over working environment. A new owner will often come in and over work the prior ownership dedicating more time, money and effort to re-vitalize an existing company than the prior ownership did. That was the collective thought about this site when it was sold the last time. That a new owner would come in and over work the situation (better user interface, dedicated time to photos, cleaning up the route DB, etc. ect. ect.) As we have seen, we have instead a manage-for-cash environment. From a business standpoint, this is an acceptable place to be. It is, however, as can be clearly seen here, a form of dying.

Now dying can take a long time or a short time and it is inevitable. If a company isn’t over working and isn’t growing, it is dying. Facebook is dying, it may take years or it may take decades, but it isn’t over working for growth, it is dying. Facebook will generate lots of cash until it dies. Google (Alphabet) is dying despite trying to be continually innovative. Microsoft – dying. This list goes on and on. Some of the dying companies are managed to generate more cash than others, but in the end, if you aren’t growing you are dying. Warren Buffet makes very good money on dying. The companies he buys are all dying. He just is fantastic at calculating how much cash they will generate vs. how much they could be bought for. This type of analysis is only possible on dying companies. Look even at the name of his company, Berkshire-Hathaway. It is the name of two now dead companies.

New owners can over work and create growth. Re-orgs can temporarily create over work and growth. Expanding into new markets can create growth. Doing nothing does not create growth. And that is why this place is in the state that it is. With no over working, no growth, and no change, death is the inevitable result.


Partner happiegrrrl


Nov 26, 2015, 12:08 AM
Post #83 of 238 (24559 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

When there are ten poster repeatedly putting up asshat comments and jacking threads for sport, it may look like liveliness(especially to the asshats!) but the less excitable bread and butter users may or may not be enjoying the show.

The thing is, regular users don't have access to the stats the site is pulling. The ones who can see the traffic patterns and see the navigation of users within the platform, they are in a position to know if asshattery is good or bad for a site.


sungam


Nov 26, 2015, 3:26 AM
Post #84 of 238 (24552 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
When there are ten poster repeatedly putting up asshat comments and jacking threads for sport, it may look like liveliness(especially to the asshats!) but the less excitable bread and butter users may or may not be enjoying the show.
Clearly not allowing derailing/asshattery has worked wonders for the forum activity Unimpressed


Partner happiegrrrl


Nov 26, 2015, 2:01 PM
Post #85 of 238 (24528 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

The forums were dead in the waters when Jeff bought the site.

If you don't want to see what happened here, take a look at Supertopo, where posters have been *enjoying* the asshattery the whole time. Many of the best climbers in recent history used to post regularly there and one by one they began to leave because the nastiness and other BS made them wonder why people had to act that way. They stated it outright. Nowadays you have about 10 people who create drama and stupidity in most every thread. There is still some quality of life in the site, but the top posts are filled with vileness, ignorance and idiocy; from the same few posters running rampant.

Anyway - Happy Thanksgiving Day to those in US and Happy Just Today for those others. Today I am going to take a look at the Blowing Rock bouldering area in NC. And then have my 2nd Annual Cracker Barrel T/G Day meal.


roninthorne


Nov 26, 2015, 8:42 PM
Post #86 of 238 (24513 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2002
Posts: 659

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
The forums were dead in the waters when Jeff bought the site.

If you don't want to see what happened here, take a look at Supertopo, where posters have been *enjoying* the asshattery the whole time. Many of the best climbers in recent history used to post regularly there and one by one they began to leave because the nastiness and other BS made them wonder why people had to act that way.

Which is ironic, since it was, as often as not, 'some of the best climbers in modern history' who were creating a good bit of the BS and wearing the asshats.

People stop to look at train wrecks and suicides.... and there is always another new train wreck or suicide just down the information superhighway.

Controlling who talks about climbing and how is as impossible as controlling who climbs... but a special breed believes that someday somehow, they will figure out how to do all three.

That's human nature; breaking the rules and challenging the impossible.

Sounds a lot like climbing, doesn't it?


sungam


Nov 27, 2015, 7:55 PM
Post #87 of 238 (24465 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There is a very large difference between toxicity and threads following a natural progression to casual discussion.
I never said it was Jeff that did it, either. I wasn't referring to his "no nasty language" kinda-rule that came in.


Partner happiegrrrl


Nov 28, 2015, 1:37 AM
Post #88 of 238 (24445 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

So then, about when was it that "not allowing derailing/asshattery" was instituted at this site?

As for toxicity, I suppose it depends on one's level of taste. Trailer trash types think Corelleware is "fine china," after all. But seems to me that there has been plenty of vile and toxic banter on this thread....back before derailing and asshattery was frowned upon, at least.


6pacfershur


Nov 30, 2015, 2:48 AM
Post #89 of 238 (24384 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2010
Posts: 254

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
........Trailer trash types think Corelleware is "fine china," ........

have you been a judgmental ass all your life or did it slowly develop as you got older?


Partner happiegrrrl


Nov 30, 2015, 1:15 PM
Post #90 of 238 (24366 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [6pacfershur] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

I guess you are a fan of Correlleware then.


Rokjox


Nov 30, 2015, 5:01 PM
Post #91 of 238 (24354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Happi, the only "regular users" (in which you are not included) who do not have access to the website stats on users is the ones who are without-a-clue. Alexa and a dozen other sites provide extensive analitics on EVERY major website..

http://www.alexa.com/


I wouldn't want to make it TOO easy for you, but explore that site and you will find a dozen solid statistics, all nicely graphed. Supertopo is one of the most stricken that is still alive. They used to have a posistion solidly in the 20,000 range, now they have fallen off the entire graph, alexa no longer publishes their complete states because Supertopo doesn't even make the top 100,000, if you can call that "top". THIS SITE has FAR better attendance than ST does, even NOW. As a "dead site" NOBODY is watching ST anymore, not in the numbers they were when I was posting there. Not for the last TWO YEARS (and more) have they even put a blip in the charts. COMPLETELY BLANK and forgotten. And it took them a WHILE to fall that far because of averaging errors. ST is now all about the "gear reviews" that never have a bad word to say about ANYKIND of junk or crap that is ever sold to anybody. Look at the front page anytime, even though nobody bumps a gear review much, they are always on the front page. Because nobody else is posting enough to move them down.

HA-ha-ha!

The guys you hate (and who hated you) WERE the top climbers. They ARE gone now, and it had nothing much to do with the battles they engaged in with each other, it has to do with how much fun the website and the posters were. And are NOT now.

Supertopo and RC are NOT FUN ANY MOREZ. The bigmouth self-righteous Christians, like yourself, got EXACTLY what they wanted, the death of anybody who posted ANYTHING they did not like. YOU RUN SUPERTOPO NOW! So what is it you don't like again?

I could still be posting if I chose another username, but I refuse to because I did nothing wrong and will not hide from a pandering bunch of sycophants all yelling in unison about how butthurt they are about people bolder and more thoughtful than yourself "controlling" the forum discussions. So WE badboys are all GONE now. Its YOURS. And who the Hell wants to read what YOU post?


YOU are the cause of the death of forums, you need look no farther than that. Banning people first because they had not enough credentials (like Fattrad and Lois) then because they were not respectful enough (to YOU) or because they talked "rough" became banning people because they had "too many posts". EVERYBODY good has a ban somewhere.

If you ban the most enthusiastic and prolific posters, it gets you exactly where you are now with Supertopo. And THIS site, too. And "Mountains and Stuff", and all the others.

Damn near talking to yourself with only a few people left who can even STAND reading the tripe you post. PLENTY of people have asked for your insipid self to be banned. Lets face it, you are a nobody/non-climber who should have been taken out and shot years ago. You are FAR too lame to ride. No man wants to saddle you even for a joke. You got nothing to say, and all those who DID have stories and sharp opinions are gone now.


So can YOU keep Supertopo afloat? Can YOU find enough people who love or hate your stuff enough to even bother to reply at all? I think not. You are just another hanger on, glorying in what you perceive to be bold and badass climbers hanging onto YOUR every word. But as you have noted, all the badasses turned out to be difficult and annoying people who did not pay you much attention. They insulted you. Wah-wah-wah.

So are you Happi with the "ten guys" who remain posting on that website? You ain't gonna get no strokes from Werner, you know.



Bye-bye Happi. Hope you choke on that Cracker Barrel T-day dinner. Must be lonely being you. I got a 17 lb turkey smoked for 7 hours at a table including my wife, some of my kids and some of my grandkids. Wasn't 17 people like the last time my wife did the meal, but it was pretty good turnout given how many of our kids are out-of-state.



Bye again Not-so-Happigrrrrrrll.






(EDIT: Just checked Alexa again and BOTH this site and Supertopo has fallen off the chart. This site is down 41.5 THOUSAND places this month. Rounding errors eventually work themselves out.

ST is running a 40% bounce rate. That means 40% of the people who hit the site turn away IMMEDIATELY and go somewhere else. And its not because they read some shee, they are reading NOTHING. Just like here, there is nothing TO read.)

MY how fast the end comes once it starts to nose-over. You can say it's still going, you can call it flying, but the landing is cataclysmic.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Nov 30, 2015, 6:03 PM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Nov 30, 2015, 5:45 PM
Post #92 of 238 (24346 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rox - I am aware of Alexa, Quantcast and other sites that provide demographics. That is not the same as being privy to in-house navigation.


sungam


Nov 30, 2015, 6:41 PM
Post #93 of 238 (24340 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
As for toxicity, I suppose it depends on one's level of taste. Trailer trash types think Corelleware is "fine china," after all.
Yeah I would say being shitty about "trailer trash" and elitest about the kind of china you use counts as toxicity, thanks for the example.Cool


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 1, 2015, 2:37 PM
Post #94 of 238 (24269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Funny, I would think the personal attacks on anyone that asked the BET to stop bombing every thread that occurred on the site a few years ago would have been a more apt example of toxicity than my making a general reference that was attached to nobody on this forum.

Myself - I could take it. I am a Taurus after all - bull-headed, stubborn, and a person who will stick to their convictions against any adversary. But there were plenty of people who were abused that simply stopped posting, or left, rather than fight a few bullies and their cheerleading squad.

To be clear - Sungam, I don't think of you as ever having been a caustic person this site. When I think of the things you have posted over the years, I remember a sort of happy go lucky person. That you happen to be one of the few posting on this thread, I just wanted to clarify my comments were not referring you personally.


brianri


Dec 1, 2015, 4:56 PM
Post #95 of 238 (24259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2003
Posts: 126

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You're right. The dates on the forum threads say it all. Mountain Project has won the battle if there ever even was one.


curt


Dec 1, 2015, 8:45 PM
Post #96 of 238 (24236 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [brianri] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

brianri wrote:
You're right. The dates on the forum threads say it all. Mountain Project has won the battle if there ever even was one.

Actually, most of the communications among RC.com members that used to occur on the forums here have probably moved to Facebook--not MP. MP has never been particularly valued for its forums--more for its routes database and photos.

Curt


brianri


Dec 1, 2015, 9:06 PM
Post #97 of 238 (24231 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 28, 2003
Posts: 126

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
In reply to:
Actually, most of the communications among RC.com members that used to occur on the forums here have probably moved to Facebook--not MP. MP has never been particularly valued for its forums--more for its routes database and photos.

Curt
"never been particularly valued for its forums" is very subjective. There are new posts there by the minute compared to by the week here. What FaceBook page are you talking about? Does rc climbing have a FaceBook site or is it a hodgepodge of different sites depending on the area?


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 1, 2015, 11:04 PM
Post #98 of 238 (24216 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [brianri] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think Curt probably means people just post their climbing stuff on their own FB pages. RCdotcom does have a FB and Twitter page, but even when it was active it was not done with any serious effort.


Partner blazesod


Dec 2, 2015, 5:56 AM
Post #99 of 238 (24184 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 27, 2002
Posts: 249

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I enjoyed climbing with you Happiegrrrl (and others). Happy holidays, be safe, and climb on.

Cheers,
-Dave B

Smile


sungam


Dec 2, 2015, 6:33 PM
Post #100 of 238 (24343 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

uh, my reply didn't post. That's okay because it gives me the 100 snipe*

tl;dr I am bitter because my favourite internet playground is a ghost town now.





*YES I KNOW


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 3, 2015, 1:58 AM
Post #101 of 238 (23303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Don't be bitter.

Ok, be bitter.


Rokjox


Dec 3, 2015, 4:06 PM
Post #102 of 238 (23264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

And I'm just being snarky because of the past history w/ the little Miss.

I used to support herr when she got a lot of shee for some time she failed to impress someone (on ST). Somehow that changed and I don't offer her the kind of kudos I once did. Now she seems to be expexting other people to behave according to some rules she has set up without getting a contract signed by the rest of the world. It's called Magical Thinking by some.

I know she hates me, I read the emails and saved them for future enjoyment. I should tell her now how much of an influence she has been on me.

After considering her opinion, I took all my clothes off, washed my Chakra with sage smoke, took an enema and spent months in meditation and therapy.

I now recognize that my essential self occasionally manifests itself as a difficult person (step one, admit the problem), but I am now OK with that, its only a small, manageable handicap and many have it, such as God.

(God is DIFFICULT!, trust me, we talk all the time)

I have aligned myself now with the essential white light of the universe and I feel GOOD about myself as a result.

HALLALUHA-HA-HA!!


Bye, happi. You ROCK girl~!





...byyee...
(Blush)


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Dec 3, 2015, 4:24 PM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 3, 2015, 6:15 PM
Post #103 of 238 (23255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
"I know she hates me, I read the emails and saved them for future enjoyment."

There is something wrong with you Rokjox. I have emails which we exchanged too, you know. There wre two series. The first was innocuous and came from you, after a thread on Supetopo where you requested information about dog sitters in Queens, I guess for your kid's dog. I mentioned, on ST, that I had a very good one and would provide contact if you wanted. You sent me a message via ST thanking me. (5/20/08)

I responded to that email with the phone number of the sitter, my personal reference, and to mention that I had referred them if they contacted the service.


The next one came, again from you, and unsolicited, on 1/31/10. It started out
In reply to:
"Happi;


thanks for the post, It would mean a lot to Rokjox that you cared enough to say that.

But Rokjox died last night."

Not sure what that was about...Perhaps it was when your profile got deactivated on ST

The next one, again unsolicited, came on 2/2/10 where you detailed your conversations with CMac about the way some people were being towards women on the site. Apparently it was a stupid drama of some sort, and you were intending to defend the women. You sent the same email to LEB and Crimpergirl, and so now my email address was known to LEB.

I must have said - on ST - that I didn't like having my email address made available, because the next email from you came the next day, 2/3/10 where you said I could have just emailed you about my distress instead of making it public.

I did respond to that email, and if you'd like, I can post a screenshot of it here.

The next day you emailed me and apologized for for it, saying you hadn't realized it was an issue. I responded, accepted your apology and reiterated that I did not like to have behind-the-scenes conversations pertaining to forum discussion drama, and that I would not be corresponding further on the subject.

That was the last email communication you and I had.



So.... I have no clue what emails you think show that I have a hatred for you, but let's get this straight right now.

I'm considering the last two posts you have made that reference me to be harassment. Please stop. If you cannot, or will not, do so, I will send a message to Jeff, asking for his assistance in disallowing you to continue.


theguy


Dec 3, 2015, 10:48 PM
Post #104 of 238 (23232 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
disallowing you to continue.

Did I miss something...is 'ban' a prohibited word? Can't imagine what else led to this convoluted phrase.


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 3, 2015, 11:01 PM
Post #105 of 238 (23227 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [theguy] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I didn't suggest that being banned from the site might be an outcome. I have no idea what Jeff would do if I complained. That's not my within my control.


Rokjox


Dec 3, 2015, 11:33 PM
Post #106 of 238 (23221 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

THAT is what you call "Passive Aggressive".


Oh, little anonymous avatar, who could harass a figment of your imagination? Legally unlikely. You are the one showing your undies. I had thought YOU were soliciting the dog walking job. Didn't you do street walking professionally in Queens?

As to Jeff, eh, maybe he will do less than you hope.

Do whatever you want, baby. You will anyway. I bet that email is already been sent, hot electrons blazing their way across the limitless expanse of your rage. I can recommend you some website that give good advice on such things. There is a process and a form to follow.

I spent some time recently learning about such things.


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 4, 2015, 12:11 AM
Post #107 of 238 (23214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

There is nothing passive about my aggressiveness. It was a direct request and you have chosen to ignore it. I have flagged the three posts.

Now, leave me alone.


ubu


Dec 4, 2015, 1:47 AM
Post #108 of 238 (23208 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I'm starting to remember why I liked this place


sungam


Dec 4, 2015, 1:57 AM
Post #109 of 238 (23207 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.


sungam


Dec 4, 2015, 1:58 AM
Post #110 of 238 (23205 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^


(This post was edited by sungam on Dec 4, 2015, 1:58 AM)


ubu


Dec 4, 2015, 2:51 AM
Post #111 of 238 (23192 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
There is nothing passive about my aggressiveness. It was a direct request and you have chosen to ignore it. I have flagged the three posts.

Now, leave me alone.

I dunno, if you and Rox keep at it you might be able to singlehandedly (well, doublehandedly) revive this site.


ubu


Dec 4, 2015, 2:58 AM
Post #112 of 238 (23188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 4, 2015, 3:13 PM
Post #113 of 238 (23149 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.


ubu


Dec 4, 2015, 3:18 PM
Post #114 of 238 (23147 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.

Yes, but at least they are opinionated rock-climbing jerks.


mojomonkey


Dec 4, 2015, 6:31 PM
Post #115 of 238 (23121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
Myself - I could take it. I am a Taurus after all - bull-headed, stubborn, and a person who will stick to their convictions against any adversary. But there were plenty of people who were abused that simply stopped posting, or left, rather than fight a few bullies and their cheerleading squad.

Yes, it was clear you pictured yourself as the champion of some downtrodden posters but I usually found your crusading more tiresome than what you were "battling". It often felt that you saw more adversaries than there really were. You clearly have your ideal of how a forum should be, but need to accept that not everyone will feel the same.

I was hopeful (very mildly anyway - and excited also seemed way to strong an emotion) to see new posts here. That was quickly replaced with the let down of "oh, just happiegrrrl complaining about a years-passed grudge with the BET posters".


iknowfear


Dec 4, 2015, 8:48 PM
Post #116 of 238 (23101 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ubu wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.

Yes, but at least they are opinionated rock-climbing jerks.

less content more quote boxes


iknowfear


Dec 4, 2015, 8:50 PM
Post #117 of 238 (23098 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

iknowfear wrote:
ubu wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.

Yes, but at least they are opinionated rock-climbing jerks.

less content more quote boxes [/quote

Blast from the past, including cheesetit (or is that a non pc word which gets the banz?


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 4, 2015, 9:08 PM
Post #118 of 238 (23093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

iknowfear wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
ubu wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.

Yes, but at least they are opinionated rock-climbing jerks.

less content more quote boxes [/quote

Blast from the past, including cheesetit (or is that a non pc word which gets the banz?

Ixnay on the anbay alktay. Or off to the soap box we will be sent.


iknowfear


Dec 4, 2015, 9:33 PM
Post #119 of 238 (23091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
ubu wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ubu wrote:
sungam wrote:
sungam wrote:
ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place
There's a reason the reality tv gets more funding then documentaries.
I MISS THE OLD HISTORY CHANNEL ((((((

Edit to add: this is me staying wayyy tf out of whatever is going on up there ^

"Without conflict, there is no progress"

I always thought the best way for rc.com to get back on its feet would be to show soap box posts on the front page. Why hide the best part of the site?

Rc.com, come because it has "rock climbing" in the url, stay for the opinionated jerks.

Yes, but at least they are opinionated rock-climbing jerks.

less content more quote boxes [/quote

Blast from the past, including cheesetit (or is that a non pc word which gets the banz?

Ixnay on the anbay alktay. Or off to the soap box we will be sent.

that would require a mod action... something we havent seen in a while.


Gmburns2000


Dec 5, 2015, 5:33 PM
Post #120 of 238 (23031 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jeff bought the site at X price knowing Y stats and Z revenue. He probably realized that the site couldn't continue Y and Z with the vitriol on the site, so he made a decision to let the site die until he could make a decision between A and B.

A: after all the vitriol dies, try to revive an already functioning site by encouraging a new generation of content (users not necessarily the key driver), maybe make improvements, and get Y and Z back up so the site could be a long-term money maker.

B: If A isn't at least reasonable, find the balance between X and Z, and sell at a point where the sale price + Z (over time) > X.

A requires more work over time, but could generate much more cash in a growing sport. B requires timing and patience and not a lot of work, but could still turn a good profit. Both are perfectly reasonable. No one should assume that any of the owners ever cared about the people who generated content the site. It's always about the math first, and then after that the method to make whichever math work.

Jeff last logged in less than a week ago, which is a lot more recent than I expected to find after an absence of something like six months. His last post, however, was more than a year ago. The waiting continues.


iknowfear


Dec 5, 2015, 6:51 PM
Post #121 of 238 (23024 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [Gmburns2000] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

much of this dialogue is soooo painfully adequate for this site!

Gmburns2000 wrote:
The waiting continues.

ESTRAGON:
(giving up again). Nothing to be done.
VLADIMIR:
(advancing with short, stiff strides, legs wide apart). I'm beginning to come round to that opinion. All my life I've tried to put it from me, saying Vladimir, be reasonable, you haven't yet tried everything. And I resumed the struggle. (He broods, musing on the struggle. Turning to Estragon.) So there you are again.
ESTRAGON:
Am I?
VLADIMIR:
I'm glad to see you back. I thought you were gone forever.
ESTRAGON:
Me too.
VLADIMIR:
Together again at last! We'll have to celebrate this. But how? (He reflects.) Get up till I embrace you.
ESTRAGON:
(irritably). Not now, not now.
VLADIMIR:
(hurt, coldly). May one inquire where His Highness spent the night?
ESTRAGON:
In a ditch.

ps: one could probably do a search & replace for godot//owner// someone who cares


onceahardman


Dec 5, 2015, 7:19 PM
Post #122 of 238 (23020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
There is nothing passive about my aggressiveness. It was a direct request and you have chosen to ignore it. I have flagged the three posts.

Now, leave me alone.

I have not seen anything that rises to anything near the level of harassment. Your two posts about trailer trash and corelle were distasteful, though.

Look in the mirror, happie.

I have stayed in a trailer, and I grew up using corelle. Now I'm a successful professional. Your posts were hurtful.


Partner macherry


Dec 6, 2015, 12:52 AM
Post #123 of 238 (22996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [Gmburns2000] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
Jeff bought the site at X price knowing Y stats and Z revenue. He probably realized that the site couldn't continue Y and Z with the vitriol on the site, so he made a decision to let the site die until he could make a decision between A and B.

A: after all the vitriol dies, try to revive an already functioning site by encouraging a new generation of content (users not necessarily the key driver), maybe make improvements, and get Y and Z back up so the site could be a long-term money maker.

B: If A isn't at least reasonable, find the balance between X and Z, and sell at a point where the sale price + Z (over time) > X.

A requires more work over time, but could generate much more cash in a growing sport. B requires timing and patience and not a lot of work, but could still turn a good profit. Both are perfectly reasonable. No one should assume that any of the owners ever cared about the people who generated content the site. It's always about the math first, and then after that the method to make whichever math work.

Jeff last logged in less than a week ago, which is a lot more recent than I expected to find after an absence of something like six months. His last post, however, was more than a year ago. The waiting continues.

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner


jt512


Dec 6, 2015, 1:44 AM
Post #124 of 238 (22988 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

ubu wrote:
I'm starting to remember why I liked this place

Yeah, me too. Anybody want to start a betting pool to see who can come closest to guessing the exact date and time that Jeff (assuming he's still the owner) will lock the thread?


jt512


Dec 6, 2015, 1:46 AM
Post #125 of 238 (23538 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

ubu wrote:
happiegrrrl wrote:
There is nothing passive about my aggressiveness. It was a direct request and you have chosen to ignore it. I have flagged the three posts.

Now, leave me alone.

I dunno, if you and Rox keep at it you might be able to singlehandedly (well, doublehandedly) revive this site.

Not if Jeff can do anything about it.


sungam


Dec 6, 2015, 4:25 AM
Post #126 of 238 (24988 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ah, the old mod duality. Both completely AFK yet locking threads simultaneously. Seemingly impossible, yet somehow happening.


Gmburns2000


Dec 6, 2015, 12:07 PM
Post #127 of 238 (24965 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Jeff bought the site at X price knowing Y stats and Z revenue. He probably realized that the site couldn't continue Y and Z with the vitriol on the site, so he made a decision to let the site die until he could make a decision between A and B.

A: after all the vitriol dies, try to revive an already functioning site by encouraging a new generation of content (users not necessarily the key driver), maybe make improvements, and get Y and Z back up so the site could be a long-term money maker.

B: If A isn't at least reasonable, find the balance between X and Z, and sell at a point where the sale price + Z (over time) > X.

A requires more work over time, but could generate much more cash in a growing sport. B requires timing and patience and not a lot of work, but could still turn a good profit. Both are perfectly reasonable. No one should assume that any of the owners ever cared about the people who generated content the site. It's always about the math first, and then after that the method to make whichever math work.

Jeff last logged in less than a week ago, which is a lot more recent than I expected to find after an absence of something like six months. His last post, however, was more than a year ago. The waiting continues.

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

wow, that didn't take long.


ncrockclimber


Dec 6, 2015, 6:31 PM
Post #128 of 238 (24942 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2006
Posts: 286

Re: [Gmburns2000] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Nice to see that the original "This place is dead!" thread that I started is still going strong after being locked and resurrected.

FWIW, the rc.com train-wreck has been both entertaining and sad to watch.

Over two years ago Jeff purchased this site. He made a big point of telling us how important the site culture was to him and how he and his wife were focused on “creating a good experience for users and staff” and “starting right now, we are here to support” the community. For the first few months Jeff sanctimoniously moderated where he saw fit and explained how his vision for the culture of the site “non-negotiable based on who I am as a person and what kind of site I want to be associated with.” I am not sure how happigrrrl and rokjox venting their spleens and demonstrating their mastery of online drama creation fits into Jeff’s vision. Since it is the only new content on the site, I am sure it is just what Jeff wanted.

I totally understand that this is Jeff’s site and he is free to do whatever he wants with it. However, I personally find the combination of his initial morally superior tone and professed focus on culture to be completely at odds with his current blatant monetization of the site and total lack of focus on site content or user experience. Based on what he has done with this site so far, it would appear that what Jeff says and what he actually does are two different things. Despite making this post, I have no interest in being a regular user here under the current management. I am sure I am not the only one that sees it this way.

I am off to the gym to work on rehabilitating my injured shoulder. I expect that this post will be deleted the next time I log in here.

Cheers!


iknowfear


Dec 6, 2015, 6:50 PM
Post #129 of 238 (24932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
Jeff bought the site at X price knowing Y stats and Z revenue. He probably realized that the site couldn't continue Y and Z with the vitriol on the site, so he made a decision to let the site die until he could make a decision between A and B.

A: after all the vitriol dies, try to revive an already functioning site by encouraging a new generation of content (users not necessarily the key driver), maybe make improvements, and get Y and Z back up so the site could be a long-term money maker.

B: If A isn't at least reasonable, find the balance between X and Z, and sell at a point where the sale price + Z (over time) > X.

A requires more work over time, but could generate much more cash in a growing sport. B requires timing and patience and not a lot of work, but could still turn a good profit. Both are perfectly reasonable. No one should assume that any of the owners ever cared about the people who generated content the site. It's always about the math first, and then after that the method to make whichever math work.

Jeff last logged in less than a week ago, which is a lot more recent than I expected to find after an absence of something like six months. His last post, however, was more than a year ago. The waiting continues.

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

wait, whaaat? What did he do? Pawn it for 200$ and a fake rolex?

And I for one, welcome our new absentee overlords


iknowfear


Dec 6, 2015, 6:57 PM
Post #130 of 238 (24930 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
Ah, the old mod duality. Both completely AFK yet locking threads simultaneously. Seemingly impossible, yet somehow happening.

If a thread is locked and no user is there to witness it, what sound does it make?




sungam


Dec 7, 2015, 12:19 AM
Post #131 of 238 (24894 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ncrockclimber wrote:
I am off to the gym to work on rehabilitating my injured shoulder.
Ack, grim. What did you do? I am just finishing getting over a dumb ankle injury (I fell down the stairs while pretending to be a pterodactyl like an idiot). Injuries totes suck!


sungam


Dec 7, 2015, 7:59 PM
Post #132 of 238 (24828 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Apparently the 1 starring stalkers were not amongst those who jumped ship.


iknowfear


Dec 8, 2015, 10:25 AM
Post #133 of 238 (24792 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?


(This post was edited by iknowfear on Dec 8, 2015, 10:27 AM)


Partner cracklover


Dec 8, 2015, 3:28 PM
Post #134 of 238 (24766 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO


iknowfear


Dec 8, 2015, 3:42 PM
Post #135 of 238 (24759 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [cracklover] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Fixed that for you.


iknowfear


Dec 8, 2015, 3:47 PM
Post #136 of 238 (24758 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post




this is my 666 Post! where is Pinktricam to clense my metal soul


lena_chita
Moderator

Dec 8, 2015, 4:14 PM
Post #137 of 238 (24752 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

iknowfear wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Fixed that for you.

Good fix. I was wondering, we know what happens to houses with absentee landlords. They end up with broken plumbing, salvaged copper pipes, and gas explosions. What's the equivalent for abandoned websites? Anyone knows how I can break off the chunk containing the climbing log? I kinda want to keep it as a souvenir...

As far as moderating goes, I am not moderating the bickering, sorry... because I don't see anything particularly harmful, and nobody is telling me otherwise. Carry on!


majid_sabet


Dec 8, 2015, 7:09 PM
Post #138 of 238 (24733 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

climbers are like unidentified species where they just don't fit in to corporate mentality

They should leave them alone and let nature do its job


jt512


Dec 8, 2015, 10:20 PM
Post #139 of 238 (24712 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [cracklover] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.


(This post was edited by jt512 on Dec 8, 2015, 10:23 PM)


mojomonkey


Dec 8, 2015, 10:40 PM
Post #140 of 238 (24705 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [lena_chita] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
I was wondering, we know what happens to houses with absentee landlords. They end up with broken plumbing, salvaged copper pipes, and gas explosions. What's the equivalent for abandoned websites?

Check out gunks.com :)


Partner macherry


Dec 8, 2015, 11:07 PM
Post #141 of 238 (24701 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

looks like he's done some random things


markc


Dec 9, 2015, 4:55 PM
Post #142 of 238 (24615 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

"I perpetually find myself with more projects than I have time."

Well, that's telling. The last big change was, "Hey, we're killing email!" Since that brought me here as much as anything I just stop in now and then. Maybe we should go back to the wreck!


sungam


Dec 9, 2015, 8:08 PM
Post #143 of 238 (24596 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

looks like he's done some random things
hi every1 im new webmaster!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is jeff but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 amke a website random ppl like me _… im 13 years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im str8 monoamory if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl and get ad revenue =) like they say the more the merrier (and more money!!!)!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses and ad clicks!!!!
DOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!

love and waffles,

t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m


iknowfear


Dec 10, 2015, 1:48 PM
Post #144 of 238 (24537 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
macherry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

looks like he's done some random things
hi every1 im new webmaster!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is jeff but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 amke a website random ppl like me _… im 13 years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im str8 monoamory if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl and get ad revenue =) like they say the more the merrier (and more money!!!)!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses and ad clicks!!!!
DOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!

love and waffles,

t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m

Pancakes, Damn it! PANCAKES!


Partner cracklover


Dec 10, 2015, 11:01 PM
Post #145 of 238 (24507 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [markc] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
Maybe we should go back to the wreck!

You joke, but....

I just checked and the spam there has actually disappeared (too ancient for spammers to care about it anymore) and there are actually climbers posting there again. Oh, only once every few months, but perhaps a resurgence is right around the corner LOL!

GO


sungam


Dec 11, 2015, 3:40 AM
Post #146 of 238 (24488 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gah, most important edit of the pasta and I missed it like a chode


oz120


Dec 11, 2015, 4:04 PM
Post #147 of 238 (24445 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 15, 2004
Posts: 53

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I miss this place being what it was when I found it. Had it not been for all the guys here I would have saved alot of money and skin not climbing. but I found a place to read what I was interested in. Maybe someday this place will come back to life but with all the lurking I do I don't think it will happen.

Wish I had made more friends on here back in the day cause right now I go maybe 2-3 other climbers I talk to a few times a year.


roninthorne


Dec 11, 2015, 4:37 PM
Post #148 of 238 (24440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2002
Posts: 659

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Grew up in a trailer while my Dad was in the military.

Being called 'trash' by someone like you is a compliment.

May an 800-pound gorilla enjoy congress with you until you expire, and if you ever give birth, I want one of the puppies.


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 11, 2015, 5:04 PM
Post #149 of 238 (24436 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [roninthorne] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

My mother owned a trailer after her husband died. I lived in that trailer for about half a year.

One does not become "trailer trash" simply by having resided in a trailer.

Just as a person isn't labeled "white trash" because they are caucasian or a "terrorist" because the are Muslin.

Really..... are those of you who jumped on that trailer trash bandwagon that simple, or just doing it to get a response out of me?

I assume the latter, and if you are so easily entertained, now you have your response. Have at it.


sungam


Dec 11, 2015, 6:13 PM
Post #150 of 238 (25844 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow I've heard "cotton kills" but yeah I agree with you "terrorist" seems a bit intense!







sorry


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 11, 2015, 11:27 PM
Post #151 of 238 (22694 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You forgot something......


onceahardman


Dec 12, 2015, 12:10 AM
Post #152 of 238 (22691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:

Just as a person isn't labeled "white trash" because they are caucasian or a "terrorist" because the are Muslin.

Are terrorists made of cheap, burlap-like fabric?

You forgot to defend your attack on people who use and enjoy corelle.


(This post was edited by onceahardman on Dec 12, 2015, 12:11 AM)


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 12, 2015, 12:29 AM
Post #153 of 238 (22685 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It was a typo, of course.


Gmburns2000


Dec 12, 2015, 12:50 AM
Post #154 of 238 (22680 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [jt512] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

You know, that's BET material right there. Lazy bunch of fucks.


onceahardman


Dec 12, 2015, 12:28 PM
Post #155 of 238 (22646 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
It was a typo, of course.

Of course it is. But you miss the broader point.

Be more careful in what you write.


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 12, 2015, 2:51 PM
Post #156 of 238 (22640 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Could you explain that further, please?


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 12, 2015, 5:23 PM
Post #157 of 238 (22623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

onceahardman wrote:
You forgot to defend your attack on people who use and enjoy corelle.

Corelle can kill
http://www.stargazette.com/...orningware/24858055/


onceahardman


Dec 13, 2015, 12:18 AM
Post #158 of 238 (22592 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
Could you explain that further, please?

Sure.

You made derogatory comments about trailer trash, and using corelle. Then, when someone else comments, clearly tongue in cheek, that he hopes you choke on your Thanksgiving dinner, you get all hurt and report his posts for being threatening. They were not threatening. Had he threatened to come to your house and shove a turkey leg bone sown your throat, that would have been threatening. If you want to trade insults, you need to have a thicker skin.

Be careful what you post. Think before you hit "post reply".


Partner happiegrrrl


Dec 13, 2015, 12:32 AM
Post #159 of 238 (22587 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

The trailer trash/corelle comment referred to NO ONE in particular. And honestly - how derogatory is it to say traiiler trash types think Corelleware is fine china?" Really....

If there is someone who rad my post and is going to feel bad at holiday dinner because they have suddenly found out that there are higher quality dinnerware that there treasured Corelle, I apologize, and I mean that sincerely - to anyone who really felt hurt.

The remark of "hope I choke" was made specifically to me, and from a person who has "been weird" directly to me in the past. You could not know this, of course. He may well insist that it was "tongue in cheek," but the guy was thrown off Supertopo(which is pretty hard to have happen) because he was becoming like a rabid animal and threatening people.

The thing is, I told him to stop, and instead he went further. THAT was when I flagged the posts.

I am dome with this conversation.


onceahardman


Dec 13, 2015, 1:04 AM
Post #160 of 238 (22583 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
The trailer trash/corelle comment referred to NO ONE in particular. And honestly - how derogatory is it to say traiiler trash types think Corelleware is fine china?" Really....

If there is someone who rad my post and is going to feel bad at holiday dinner because they have suddenly found out that there are higher quality dinnerware that there treasured Corelle, I apologize, and I mean that sincerely - to anyone who really felt hurt.

The remark of "hope I choke" was made specifically to me, and from a person who has "been weird" directly to me in the past. You could not know this, of course. He may well insist that it was "tongue in cheek," but the guy was thrown off Supertopo(which is pretty hard to have happen) because he was becoming like a rabid animal and threatening people.

The thing is, I told him to stop, and instead he went further. THAT was when I flagged the posts.

I am dome with this conversation.

You seem very unhappie...


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 15, 2015, 5:07 AM
Post #161 of 238 (22440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [markc] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
jt512 wrote:
cracklover wrote:
iknowfear wrote:
macherry wrote:

word on the street says jeff is no longer the owner

any word on who's the new owner?

Jeff has been totally silent on the issue. Not even confirming or denying anything.

GO

Jeff "Legend-In-His-Own-Mind" Widman still has rockclimbing.com listed as one of his "projects," though he may be no more attentive to his own website than he is/was to this one.

"I perpetually find myself with more projects than I have time."

Well, that's telling. The last big change was, "Hey, we're killing email!" Since that brought me here as much as anything I just stop in now and then. Maybe we should go back to the wreck!

I'm just here waiting for someone to get their stuff together.



theguy


Dec 16, 2015, 6:54 AM
Post #162 of 238 (22375 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:

Are those her shoes?


Toast_in_the_Machine


Dec 22, 2015, 3:31 PM
Post #163 of 238 (22062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [theguy] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

theguy wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:

Are those her shoes?

Ederids, yes


onceahardman


Feb 19, 2016, 12:57 AM
Post #164 of 238 (21072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
The trailer trash/corelle comment referred to NO ONE in particular. And honestly - how derogatory is it to say traiiler trash types think Corelleware is fine china?" Really....

If there is someone who rad my post and is going to feel bad at holiday dinner because they have suddenly found out that there are higher quality dinnerware that there treasured Corelle, I apologize, and I mean that sincerely - to anyone who really felt hurt.

The remark of "hope I choke" was made specifically to me, and from a person who has "been weird" directly to me in the past. You could not know this, of course. He may well insist that it was "tongue in cheek," but the guy was thrown off Supertopo(which is pretty hard to have happen) because he was becoming like a rabid animal and threatening people.

The thing is, I told him to stop, and instead he went further. THAT was when I flagged the posts.

I am dome with this conversation.

So I just visited the Corning Museum of Glass in Corning, NY. Really interesting place. They also sell some stunningly beautiful Corelle.

It might not be Royal Daulton, or whatever you consider "fine china", but it's really nice.


Partner happiegrrrl


Feb 19, 2016, 1:19 AM
Post #165 of 238 (21068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

You're not considering the Art Glass pieces "Corelle," are you? The website for the museum doesn't list any dinnerware available for sale.

Just as an FYI, Corelle is made of a three-part glass laminate. It is a tempered glass, which makes it durable. Fine Chine is made of ceramic, or porcelain.

Corelle is great for what it is - an inexpensive glass that can stand up to rigorous use. It resists chipping, and you really have to try hard to break it.

But it is not fine china.


onceahardman


Feb 19, 2016, 2:16 AM
Post #166 of 238 (21064 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
You're not considering the Art Glass pieces "Corelle," are you? The website for the museum doesn't list any dinnerware available for sale.

Just as an FYI, Corelle is made of a three-part glass laminate. It is a tempered glass, which makes it durable. Fine Chine is made of ceramic, or porcelain.

Corelle is great for what it is - an inexpensive glass that can stand up to rigorous use. It resists chipping, and you really have to try hard to break it.

But it is not fine china.

you strike me as someone who thinks she is the only one in the room who knows anything.

Of course I'm not considering art glass pieces as Corelle. I was just at the museum on Sunday. I don't care what the website says. You live in New York. Go there yourself if you want to try to prove they don't sell Corelle at the huge gift shop at the museum. Then you can finally see how pretty the modern Corelle patterns are, and stop making fun of the many people who use it.

Why is "china" called "china", anyway? Ceramic/porcelain dishware was originally imported from the Orient. By the strictest definition, one could argue that Royal Daulton isn't real "china". I have (and use at Thanksgiving), a beautiful English antique set of Johnson Bros. "Pareek". I know something about this subject. But I would never make fun of someone who considers Corelle to be their best "china". I think you are pretty low for doing so.


Partner happiegrrrl


Feb 19, 2016, 3:29 PM
Post #167 of 238 (21029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just asked a question.

I haven't yet been to the Corning Glass Museum and would like to; hot glass is an interest of mine.

It really strikes me as bizarre how a website(this one) known for making fun of others, and one where not THAT long ago anti-gay rhetoric could be found with some regularity, has people up in arms over my comment.

Yeah - I GET it - you found my comment low class. I DID apologize to anyone I offended, and it WAS a sincere apology. I am clean on that account; whether someone accepts that apology is their prerogative.


onceahardman


Feb 19, 2016, 10:40 PM
Post #168 of 238 (21007 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [happiegrrrl] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

happiegrrrl wrote:
I just asked a question.

I haven't yet been to the Corning Glass Museum and would like to; hot glass is an interest of mine.

It really strikes me as bizarre how a website(this one) known for making fun of others, and one where not THAT long ago anti-gay rhetoric could be found with some regularity, has people up in arms over my comment.

Yeah - I GET it - you found my comment low class. I DID apologize to anyone I offended, and it WAS a sincere apology. I am clean on that account; whether someone accepts that apology is their prerogative.

Happie said:

In reply to:
If there is someone who rad my post and is going to feel bad at holiday dinner because they have suddenly found out that there are higher quality dinnerware that there treasured Corelle, I apologize, and I mean that sincerely - to anyone who really felt hurt.

Forgive me, the sincerity of your apology just burned me.


zchandran


Feb 22, 2016, 5:39 AM
Post #169 of 238 (20956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.


Partner macherry


Feb 23, 2016, 1:13 AM
Post #170 of 238 (20912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [zchandran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the assholes have left.

this place is a ghost town


curt


Feb 23, 2016, 3:43 AM
Post #171 of 238 (20902 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [zchandran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.

You're saying that you were getting the kinds of answers to your posts that you were looking for over at MP. That being the case, why don't you simply post over there exclusively instead of insisting that this site change to suit you? There is absolutely no reason why RC.com, MP, Supertopo, etc. should have identical criteria for what constitutes acceptable content. I'm sorry that you got your feelings hurt here, but this place is not actually hostile to beginning climbers--some posters here simply have a low tolerance for stupidity and/or repetitive questions.

Curt


curt


Feb 23, 2016, 3:51 AM
Post #172 of 238 (20893 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
the assholes have left...

All of them? Cool

Curt


Rokjox


Feb 23, 2016, 5:57 PM
Post #173 of 238 (20847 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Oh hell no.





I ran across Aaarggdam a couple months ago and was damn near about to pop a cap before he finally let go of my leg. Its more like "the walking dead" than a reality cemetary. Dead is dead in real. Uncorporation. Around here its a huige pile of mud covering/clogging the threads and a couple madmax types cowering in the ruins. Chenobyl, but there are tourists who happen by and get mugged.

But any of the dead can still be exhumed , mostly maybe. Just no reason to. Nobody has anything they want to say.


And then there is me. right now I am about the top poster and the only real visible sign of occupancy. That makes me the most visible Rat right now.

Rats are getting some use of the databases I'd wager. The Alexis for this site is actually got better stats than supertop anyway. This corpse now has more Maggots than "climber posters" ST has ever had in last 5 years as I recall.

Now back to work answering the expectations of random internet strangers.
















Deer Shandy:

MP is stiff moderated towards business expectations, a site built to be a seller, a database driven product. I had perfectly NICE posts on two way radios redacted for some reason, without even a complaint or notice. ((maybe they just didn;t like Rokjox...)) I am an Extra Class Ham Radio guy, I have some insight and knowlege of the topic...Why they pull the post may have had something to do with them being all "our way or the highway".
Much difference of opinion is not tolerated.
There.

Just saying.


The guys who responded to you there probibly thought themselves all kinds of capable of safely telling you all kinds of things, how to do it all. They certify each other, validate each other, motivate and regulate and obfucate with each other. Many make a poor living off'n climbing some way.

I think some on REC CLIMBING (these "other" sites) might atually realize how we is ALL amateurs, and even when we are not, we cant really teach you how to do this stuff. DUDE! YOU DON'T LEARN CLIMBING OFF A SCREEN. All I will ever tell you is how to get yourself killed. "You are gonna die". And then sue me for posting the way to do it for you on a screen. I see you coming.

I CAN SHOW you how, I could TEACH you, I have taught many. But if you want pediantics (?)go and get "helped" where ever it is that you best can absorb the nutrition you need. This may not be the place. I know better than you, trust me on this. You don't want to listen to an internet expert about climbing. None of them. They will get you killed sure as hell. Get a trad partner, the older the better. Young climbers have the odds and the odds are odd. If you havn't done something stupid a lot, its not surprizing if you are still alive, So Far. Old climbers have a history of proven survival IN SPORT. Thats a different thing.

This is REC climbing, not IMGA climbing. Those guys are all over there, and only invade these ruins rarely. Praise Allah. Pass the salt.





Yeah, I'd rather be a maggot on this corpse than a tool for business and regulation. What you want is wrong, not what you got.

Ban expectations!

You are really Gonna Die.

Soon.




way too soon.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Feb 23, 2016, 6:47 PM)


zchandran


Apr 4, 2016, 3:43 AM
Post #174 of 238 (20065 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.

You're saying that you were getting the kinds of answers to your posts that you were looking for over at MP. That being the case, why don't you simply post over there exclusively instead of insisting that this site change to suit you? There is absolutely no reason why RC.com, MP, Supertopo, etc. should have identical criteria for what constitutes acceptable content. I'm sorry that you got your feelings hurt here, but this place is not actually hostile to beginning climbers--some posters here simply have a low tolerance for stupidity and/or repetitive questions.

Curt


I think "don't be a douchebag" is universal enough that multiple sites can follow it without conflict. Unless your business model is to minimize your members, in which case RC is doing a bang-up job and successfully differentiating itself from all those other forums that don't cater to the "total dick" demographic...


curt


Apr 14, 2016, 6:58 AM
Post #175 of 238 (20361 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [zchandran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.

You're saying that you were getting the kinds of answers to your posts that you were looking for over at MP. That being the case, why don't you simply post over there exclusively instead of insisting that this site change to suit you? There is absolutely no reason why RC.com, MP, Supertopo, etc. should have identical criteria for what constitutes acceptable content. I'm sorry that you got your feelings hurt here, but this place is not actually hostile to beginning climbers--some posters here simply have a low tolerance for stupidity and/or repetitive questions.

Curt


I think "don't be a douchebag" is universal enough that multiple sites can follow it without conflict. Unless your business model is to minimize your members, in which case RC is doing a bang-up job and successfully differentiating itself from all those other forums that don't cater to the "total dick" demographic...

Calling out stupidity, when merited, does not constitute being a douchebag. It's more of a public service.

Curt


Partner macherry


Apr 14, 2016, 10:34 PM
Post #176 of 238 (25773 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

still dead and jeff hasn't logged in since feb. might be time to put a fork in it


curt


Apr 14, 2016, 11:12 PM
Post #177 of 238 (25769 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Agreed.


onceahardman


Apr 16, 2016, 5:50 AM
Post #178 of 238 (25724 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yup, I used to have fun here. The last substantive discussion I've had here was about dinnerware.

It's like a favorite bar that closes. Sad, but time to move on. It has been nice knowing you here, such as it is.


zchandran


Apr 22, 2016, 5:45 PM
Post #179 of 238 (25575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.

You're saying that you were getting the kinds of answers to your posts that you were looking for over at MP. That being the case, why don't you simply post over there exclusively instead of insisting that this site change to suit you? There is absolutely no reason why RC.com, MP, Supertopo, etc. should have identical criteria for what constitutes acceptable content. I'm sorry that you got your feelings hurt here, but this place is not actually hostile to beginning climbers--some posters here simply have a low tolerance for stupidity and/or repetitive questions.

Curt


I think "don't be a douchebag" is universal enough that multiple sites can follow it without conflict. Unless your business model is to minimize your members, in which case RC is doing a bang-up job and successfully differentiating itself from all those other forums that don't cater to the "total dick" demographic...

Calling out stupidity, when merited, does not constitute being a douchebag. It's more of a public service.

Curt


It's never "stupidity" unless you're a pompous prick. In a beginner forum, it's always an honest question. Let me say that again. It's ALWAYS an honest question. In a motorcycle forum, if someone asks whether it's really that big a deal to make sure your wheels are mounted correctly, you don't say "your gonna die noob", you give them a patient explanation of how important basic safety checks are. In a chess forum, when someone asks why the Ruy Lopez is so great if it repeats moves, you don't say "STFU noob just play more", you try to give them an insightful answer that they can understand at their level.

But on RC, every time a beginner asks a question, the same twelve egotistical assholes jump on them, and tell them how stupid they are. And the "moderators" do nothing.

Stop being a dick. It's really that simple. It's too bad that the "experts" on RC don't get it. You want to bring this forum back? Simple. Fire each and every moderator for gross incompetence. Once you get rid of that dead wood, get some moderators who'll shut down the ego whores - the self-aggrandizing "guides", the trad climbers who think they're more important that Jesus, and the geezers who demand respect because they used a piton back in '82.

Then, and only then, this forum will become useful...


curt


Apr 22, 2016, 6:00 PM
Post #180 of 238 (25569 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [zchandran] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

zchandran wrote:
curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
curt wrote:
zchandran wrote:
ncrockclimber wrote:
Jeff wrote:
billcoe_ wrote:
So Jeff, you locked the thread titled This place is DEAD! In effect, eliminating one of the few remaining active topics anyone concerned about the site can offer up advice. Not sure why, unless you were feeling insecure. Let it run. Let people have discussion.

I didn't lock that discussion, not sure who did. I have no problem with you guys grousing about a situation that I agree sucks.

Possibly one of the mods thought the thread had run its course, I don't know.

Regardless, I'm still chipping away, writing code every day on the site.

Wow. One of only two or three threads in the last month that has created ANY conversation gets locked by "someone" and you just shrug your shoulders.

I continue to be shocked with what has happened (or actually not happened) to this site since October 2013. I keep on thinking it can't get any worse, but it does.

It's probably not fair to blame Jeff for locking threads. It's the "let people have discussion" that was the problem all along. Back when I was a beginner, I posted a few questions on the Beginners forums. Most of the replies were of the tone of "OMFG WHY DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS" and "NOOB YOUR GONNA DIE". Which leads me to my simple solution for these problems:

Cull the a-holes from this site.

It's that simple. I posted the same questions as a beginner on Mountain Project, and was given judgement-free advice from the posters there. Over at MP, there were climbers genuinely concerned for my welfare, and trying to help me improve. Over here, it was wall to wall a-holes who were on some type of multi-stage ego trip. Look through the posts here for snarky guides and self-fellating trad climbers ("sport climbing is neither"), and you'll see what I mean.

You're saying that you were getting the kinds of answers to your posts that you were looking for over at MP. That being the case, why don't you simply post over there exclusively instead of insisting that this site change to suit you? There is absolutely no reason why RC.com, MP, Supertopo, etc. should have identical criteria for what constitutes acceptable content. I'm sorry that you got your feelings hurt here, but this place is not actually hostile to beginning climbers--some posters here simply have a low tolerance for stupidity and/or repetitive questions.

Curt


I think "don't be a douchebag" is universal enough that multiple sites can follow it without conflict. Unless your business model is to minimize your members, in which case RC is doing a bang-up job and successfully differentiating itself from all those other forums that don't cater to the "total dick" demographic...

Calling out stupidity, when merited, does not constitute being a douchebag. It's more of a public service.

Curt


It's never "stupidity" unless you're a pompous prick. In a beginner forum, it's always an honest question. Let me say that again. It's ALWAYS an honest question. In a motorcycle forum, if someone asks whether it's really that big a deal to make sure your wheels are mounted correctly, you don't say "your gonna die noob", you give them a patient explanation of how important basic safety checks are. In a chess forum, when someone asks why the Ruy Lopez is so great if it repeats moves, you don't say "STFU noob just play more", you try to give them an insightful answer that they can understand at their level.

But on RC, every time a beginner asks a question, the same twelve egotistical assholes jump on them, and tell them how stupid they are. And the "moderators" do nothing.

Stop being a dick. It's really that simple. It's too bad that the "experts" on RC don't get it. You want to bring this forum back? Simple. Fire each and every moderator for gross incompetence. Once you get rid of that dead wood, get some moderators who'll shut down the ego whores - the self-aggrandizing "guides", the trad climbers who think they're more important that Jesus, and the geezers who demand respect because they used a piton back in '82.

Then, and only then, this forum will become useful...

This forum is not coming back. Not only is there no pulse, it has been embalmed--all that remains is to bury it.

Curt


iknowfear


Apr 24, 2016, 12:24 PM
Post #181 of 238 (25508 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH7KYmGnj40


Rokjox


Apr 25, 2016, 10:01 PM
Post #182 of 238 (25449 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Every forum I visit, on whatever topic, is hurting. No forum is growing unless its so small that getting 10 new guys wil;l make a big difference.

But especially the climbing forums are dead or dying.

Turns out climbers don't like each other. I certainly don't. Climbers suck ass.



Climbing was the greatest sport in the world.

Once.


Now its full of asswipes whose goal is simply to make money off of it, or make some cause more famous, or to make some personal fame. And those reasons for climbing suck ass too.

The REAL climbers are those who get nothing but personal stoke from climbing. And those guys don't think much of the guys who attempt to control and profit off'n climbing.

So yes, this place, as strong as it once was, is dead and will likely stay dead. Not because it wasn't fun (some of it was) but because those asswipes who had the biggest hardon for making climbing profitable also had the biggest hardon for those who saw no need for indoor gyms, color coded equipment or paid guide services that set on the boards of alphabet coded certification panels. The money-grubbers had to hate on the real enthusiasists because they just laughed at the money grubbers and the presidents of fucked-up groups like the AAC, the Sierra Club or the fucking friends of panda bears always begging for your money.

This site is just a dead canary. Just one more. You want to know what is killing climbing, look to Kalifornai, most of the real pricks in our sport seem to live there.



A couple years ago, a guy I met "online" nicknamed "skully" and I tried to become climbing partners. Or at least I tried. But within a few weeks, the guy grew to hate me, perhaps due to the thoughts I had on the future of climbing, and perhaps also a few of his "other friends". Among other things, I told him his skillset was pisspoor. He told me about all the walls he ahd done. Along with a few stories about the accidents he was in. I told him I knew he could pound pins, that he culdn't CLIMB.

A few days ago I saw a heli moving some guy off the Black Cliffs. Took them many hours from the time of the fall, even though he wasn't at ALL far from the road, maybe a couple hundred yards. Down a rocky hillside.

Turned out a few minutes ago I found out it was Skully. Took a fourty foot fall, then pulled his pro evidently.

He reportedly had 8 hours of surgery but is expected to survive.

Again.


So if I can tell some guy his skillset is weak, and he decides to hate me and spreads shit about me all over hell and back, then what chance do I have of actually helping someone here? Everybody already knows what a prick I am...

Unfortunately, I am a prick. A fucking smart one. And I am usually right. So when the guys that are right get slandered when they are right, what hope can I have? I can wait like now, until I am proven right again, but what does that make me? More hated.



You guys send money to St. Al's, care of room 4229. Cappy is there, and I am pretty sure he still has no money, no wife, and no insurance. But he's a BIG WALL CLIMBER!

With none-to-limited free climbing skills, and poor protection skills.






We are climbers, we hate climbers, climbers are fucking moronic pussies nowadays. Why SHOULDN'T this site die? WHAY too many people think climbing can be taught over the computer screen. This place was a danger to the community. All dangerous sport forums are.

The only thing a climbing website is good for is boosting the ego of the owners.

Too Fucking Bad. I could use some new partners, my old ones are dying out from old age. But where would I find them, Here???

No fucking chance, MY reputation is bad. Forum Posters don't like me. My advice is suspect, I don't support flying squirrels.

Or stupid shit. "Yer Gonna Die" is about all I can offer most new climbers. They are innoculated against my advice, I don't own a Indoor Gym, sell raw fish for the climbers Raves or offer to guide noobs for cash. I don't support ASCA, AAC or any of the clubs that exist to take money from climbers.

And I think I am actually more like most climbers than the "regulators" want to admit. I support my sport, not the sport those who want to manipulate climbing want to create.

Code
 
Properly viewed, Climbs are not created, they are discovered. If you are cleaning, bolting and yo-yoing pitches for any reason, you are not climbing, you are wanking off.

And I hate wankers. Especially climbing wankers.


Yes, climbing forums are dead, just some guys are willing to spend a lot of time on something that makes no money at all, but makes them feel relevant and important. The body is kept fresh looking... like Lenin in his glass crypt; but its still a dead motherfucker.


Good luck Curt, aren't you glad you didn't spend YOUR money on this crypt?


mojomonkey


Apr 26, 2016, 1:42 PM
Post #183 of 238 (25428 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
Every forum I visit, on whatever topic, is hurting.

Maybe you are the common thread? Self-stroking wall of text posts can be a turn off.


Partner jammer


Apr 26, 2016, 3:42 PM
Post #184 of 238 (25420 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3472

Re: [curt] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:

This forum is not coming back. Not only is there no pulse, it has been embalmed--all that remains is to bury it.

Curt

I use to look forward to checking this site as much as possible when I first joined. It was exciting to see the encouragement, learn from the experienced, attend the gatherings at Rumney, make new friends ... but then there were those whose posts put out the fire in many threads. This place could be alive once again if people would stop slamming others just for the fun of it.

Just for the heck of it, I thought I would stop by today (since it is snowing outside) to see how the site is doing ... and I came upon this thread.

I really miss the days when a climber could feel at home here.


Rokjox


Apr 26, 2016, 5:11 PM
Post #185 of 238 (25411 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [jammer] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Did your daddy beat you with a belt?

Did Yo Momma spent her time telling you what a dumship you were?

Did your brothers outed you whenever you did anything you could get into trouble over?

Did your sisters tell their friends that you werre a wanker who knew nothing about how to screw and you usually dropped
your partner before the finish?

Did some strange neighbor offer to school you on sex over the internet?

Did your grandmother tell you that you were doing it all wrong?

Did your grandfather tell you he did your girlfriend years before you ever saw her and
that he did her without modern rubber, did not take her to dinner first and thought she
was so unimpressive that he never even bragged about it?

If home was anything like this place, You got a weird homelife.

Eat dirt and fall, brother. Dead is dead for a reason.







PS: If your attention span is so short or your reading skills so poor that
a half page of text forms an inpentratable "Text-Wall"
for you, well, I'm impressed by
your raw determination to put me in my place. I really do support The Handicapped.

I am so ashamed. I feel the need for an explanation... see, I actually learned to TYPE
before the second grade, MY mother was taking a typing class, and I duplicated her homework on a manual TYPEWRITER!
Had to actually PRESS the keys and everything.
I was being dual tracked before they called it that, homeschool AND
public school, and I learned to think in paragraphs.
Oh, and Daddy taught me to read before I ever went to my first, first grade class. It's just the kind of guy he was.

It's quite noisy in my head, you should hear it... except that to you it might
just sound like the "Brrrappp" of a Modem.

Sorry again for the "wall of words". Find someone to read it for you, or just skip it.
Thats what most people do when they see a "wall of words" beyond their ability to handle.

They just skip it.

I really don't care if one particular person removes themselves from
the conversation. If you can't keep up, its perfectly understandable. We all do what we can, at the level we find ourselves at..

Perhaps I need to rate my posts?







""WARNING! 5.9+ Wordwall ahead with 5.10b cusswords and an R to X degree of risk to your ego!
Watch the runnout in the third paragraph!""

What more do you want from Me?

Free Beer?


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Apr 26, 2016, 5:53 PM)


Partner jammer


Apr 26, 2016, 8:35 PM
Post #186 of 238 (25392 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3472

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
Did your daddy beat you with a belt?

Did Yo Momma spent her time telling you what a dumship you were?

Did your brothers outed you whenever you did anything you could get into trouble over?

Did your sisters tell their friends that you werre a wanker who knew nothing about how to screw and you usually dropped
your partner before the finish?

Did some strange neighbor offer to school you on sex over the internet?

Did your grandmother tell you that you were doing it all wrong?

Did your grandfather tell you he did your girlfriend years before you ever saw her and
that he did her without modern rubber, did not take her to dinner first and thought she
was so unimpressive that he never even bragged about it?

If home was anything like this place, You got a weird homelife.

Eat dirt and fall, brother. Dead is dead for a reason.







PS: If your attention span is so short or your reading skills so poor that
a half page of text forms an inpentratable "Text-Wall"
for you, well, I'm impressed by
your raw determination to put me in my place. I really do support The Handicapped.

I am so ashamed. I feel the need for an explanation... see, I actually learned to TYPE
before the second grade, MY mother was taking a typing class, and I duplicated her homework on a manual TYPEWRITER!
Had to actually PRESS the keys and everything.
I was being dual tracked before they called it that, homeschool AND
public school, and I learned to think in paragraphs.
Oh, and Daddy taught me to read before I ever went to my first, first grade class. It's just the kind of guy he was.

It's quite noisy in my head, you should hear it... except that to you it might
just sound like the "Brrrappp" of a Modem.

Sorry again for the "wall of words". Find someone to read it for you, or just skip it.
Thats what most people do when they see a "wall of words" beyond their ability to handle.

They just skip it.

I really don't care if one particular person removes themselves from
the conversation. If you can't keep up, its perfectly understandable. We all do what we can, at the level we find ourselves at..

Perhaps I need to rate my posts?







""WARNING! 5.9+ Wordwall ahead with 5.10b cusswords and an R to X degree of risk to your ego!
Watch the runnout in the third paragraph!""

What more do you want from Me?

Free Beer?

A perfect example of why this site is highly ignored by anyone. Good luck with the site and let the quoted response be a warning for all who venture here.


Rokjox


Apr 27, 2016, 4:55 AM
Post #187 of 238 (25373 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [jammer] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow.

You don't like "text-walls" so you cut and for no reason paste together a duplicate of the one I just posted, then added a little whine. How curious.

And you make a simple mistake in comprehension... this place is NOT "highly ignored". It is DEAD. There is a difference. Highly ignored is You. DEAD is DEAD.

There is nobody left here but the fleas and the worms.

This is the Highest Level of RC.com, the General Tab.

You think this kind of off topic shet would just set here for a couple fortnights (forever) if the site were not an abandoned building? This is Chernobyl after the meltdown.
The thread topic is "This Place Is DEAD, Part 2." You had honest and fair warning when you clicked the top thread in the top level post.
A little critical comprehension goes a long way. Be personally responsible for what happens to you.

((Hint: they WANT you at Supertopo. They love gumbys there, they will LOVE you and PAMPER you there. Go there. They will answer all your short and simple questions there. THEY NEED YOU.))



Kid, you are FAR too serious to be a climber. You got to take off some of your clothes and wave your junk around. Get a fkng sense of humor about yourself. You ain't posting stuff good enough to inspire big think kind of responses. Just having a personal need on your behalf puts no onus on my behalf to help you. You want help, you get to ask nice or you get what you get.

You are the one with the problems, not me. You want help, go ask someone who cares about you, or make me care.

With your attitude, well;

You Are Gonna Die.

Whether you whine about it or not.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Apr 27, 2016, 5:03 AM)


Partner jammer


Apr 27, 2016, 1:54 PM
Post #188 of 238 (25352 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3472

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Fleas and worms? I see you think highly of this site. May I ask why you are still here? I wonder why the only people left are those who tear the place down instead of build it up?

Flashback to the early 2000's. People came here to find partners, discuss road trips, create gatherings, share good times, provide solid instruction to new climbers, do new product research, ENCOURAGE each other. All the traits that built this site in the beginning are missing. Page after page of insults have replaced the valued insight people use to give.

For some reason those who remain believe the better they are at insulting people the better climber they must be ... or has the reason for the site moved from climbing to pure insolence?

And yes, there are many sites where a climber can have a normal conversation with other climbers without flame wars.


Rokjox


Apr 27, 2016, 4:06 PM
Post #189 of 238 (25347 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [jammer] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

jammer wrote:
Fleas and worms? I see you think highly of this site. May I ask why you are still here? I wonder why the only people left are those who tear the place down instead of build it up?

Flashback to the early 2000's. People came here to find partners, discuss road trips, create gatherings, share good times, provide solid instruction to new climbers, do new product research, ENCOURAGE each other. All the traits that built this site in the beginning are missing. Page after page of insults have replaced the valued insight people use to give.

For some reason those who remain believe the better they are at insulting people the better climber they must be ... or has the reason for the site moved from climbing to pure insolence?

And yes, there are many sites where a climber can have a normal conversation with other climbers without flame wars.







WOW, I have not laughed that hard in weeks. You talk about how rad this place was around 2000. Do you know what this year is?
I don't remember offhand when this site originated, but 2000 was 16 years ago. I had been climbing for about 30 years by them and I PROMISE
you that if that was the "Golden Age" of forums, well then you missed it.

Yeah, Go to StuporTopo, NOBODY has flamewars There.




(Damn, another burst of laughter, I am Gasping like I just did a 1/4 mile sprint.)




Guy, I "respected" this site when it was viable, but now its DEAD. DEAD. You understand Dead? ((STINKY))
Its still here because their bill was paid up by the year and somewhere a server is humming in the dark, waiting to be turned off.

((Is this a Go-Daddy site? I don't care enough to even look. Its actually irrevelant now.))

Thats all it is, and when the fee for the name runs out, it will go into the tank again until someone again pays for the name. But it is unlikely that all the databases
here of the past will ever be preserved, as the people selling the name are not the people who own the content.
And it appears that "Mitch" is dead. Forever, most likely. Our common future. Shared destiny.

And the content is too large to be really wanted by a new operator. Most of the actual route data and the advice you value
are duplicated and done BETTER at Mountain Project.

Doesn't the fact that almost nobody BUT me has bothered to recognise that you even posted, strike you as notable? I am the local virtual equivlent to Gollum,
a wretched soul, shunned by the powers of this world, hanging out in the ruins of one large structure and obsessing on the "Precious".
There are a few other hangers on, but in no way is there any "community" here any longer.

Unless YOU want to pony up some cash and take on the responsibility of RUNNING this site, then you are going to be just
another wanderer getting waylayed as you pass by. You are nothing special. You just walked into an Apache Bar,
damn near empty, but Whitey is not especially loved here. You had better flash some money quick before you are just thumped
on and thrown out. Nothing Personal, its just that you are proving yourself not only clueless, but delusional.
This is not 1999, and you cannot go back to the turn of the century. This is how it is. Now. The only real moment in all of eternity.


Dude, you better not go to ST, they will eat you as a snack. You are GRASS and they are cows.



Yeah, there are plenty of forums where climbers don't flame each other... but they are all on another Internet, circling some other star. But I like your fantasy.







Hey, tell me something about yourself. I want to know how it is you found your way here without meeting any actual climbers online.
Give me your age, sexual orientation and IQ. A list of remedial schools and mental hospitals would be fun too.

You on any drugs? Any GOOD ones? Have you ever manged to lose your virginity? To someone else, I mean.

I really want to know. You are IMPORTANT to me. Without you, who will make me laugh around here?


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Apr 27, 2016, 6:44 PM)


billcoe_


May 1, 2016, 2:14 AM
Post #190 of 238 (25216 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [Roxjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, I like reading your stuff Lance (although it tends to being too long) but it ain't dead and done till Jeff says it's dead and done. As this thread is going, it ain't there yet. JT even posted!

Hey Jeff, I'm sure someone wants to see a photo of GBlauers husband when they log in and there's probably a story about that, but the rest of us want to see some climbing shots. In the winter, make that climbing shots on a warm sunny beach.

This is what we all see everytime we all log in.



(This post was edited by billcoe_ on May 3, 2016, 1:40 PM)


sungam


May 4, 2016, 3:47 AM
Post #191 of 238 (25074 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
us want to see some climbing shots. In the winter, make that climbing shots on a warm sunny beach.

zchandran wrote:
You want to bring this forum back? Simple. Fire each and every moderator for gross incompetence.


Okay, so what I'm picking up here is !!!!!!MAKE SUNGAM SUPREME HEAD MOD AND PHOTOEDITER!!!!!

I have been saying this for years!

Maybe I should make several hilarious new photographs and perhaps post my backlog of threads deemed both witty and entertaining by extensive peer review. I have a particularly funny one that I may or may not have saved somewhere (I must check!!!) that involves Kennyoce climbing onto the roof of the shed we built while I stayed at his house and claiming the FA. It was EXTREMELY funny!!!!

Give me a second I might have something here.


(This post was edited by sungam on May 4, 2016, 3:48 AM)


sungam


May 4, 2016, 3:49 AM
Post #192 of 238 (25072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

give me a second I think it's on Drive somewhere


sungam


May 4, 2016, 4:26 AM
Post #193 of 238 (25070 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

POST ITT EVERY TIME YOUR BOOTS FALL APART MID TRIP




sungam


May 4, 2016, 4:29 AM
Post #194 of 238 (25069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OR YOUR PARTNER'S BACKPACK????



sungam


May 4, 2016, 4:30 AM
Post #195 of 238 (25068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OR YOUR PARTNER'S BACKPACK AGAIN IN THE SAME TRIP THAT TURNED INTO A TRIP OF PURE SUFFERING?????




sungam


May 4, 2016, 4:51 AM
Post #196 of 238 (25065 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

WOW RC.COM GOT MY BACK YET AGAIN it totally crashed and didn't post my comedy post about crying because hiking with a big pack on down a steep snowy hill is really shit


sungam


May 4, 2016, 5:13 AM
Post #197 of 238 (25062 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Then we found this refuge hut thing and slept for like legit 15 hours it was good.




ALL WE WANTED TO DO WAS CLIMB SQAUREFACE AND MITRE RIDGE


sungam


May 4, 2016, 5:18 AM
Post #198 of 238 (25060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

man that quote block is grim


sungam


May 4, 2016, 5:18 AM
Post #199 of 238 (25059 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

PUBLIC SERVICE, MUST MOVE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE, ITS WHAT A GOOD MOD WOULD DO


sungam


May 4, 2016, 5:19 AM
Post #200 of 238 (26547 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

PTFTW I HAVE SAVED U ALL ))))))


sungam


May 4, 2016, 5:19 AM
Post #201 of 238 (22291 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
PTFTW I HAVE SAVED U ALL ))))))
A REAL PTFTW for the true posts per page count of 100


Rokjox


May 9, 2016, 3:06 PM
Post #202 of 238 (22118 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

"... ain't dead and done till Jeff says it's dead and done. As this thread is going, it ain't there yet. JT even posted! ..."



Just me and Sungam have posted on this thread, this site since April, Given that this site used to have a thousand posts a week, yeah, I can really see how hard it is to understand DEAD.

This is the TOP POST and yet therre is almost no activity after a week?


DEAD!








Now please understand, if possible:

I am seldom wrong, and I don't make shit up. Would it make you feel BETTER if your local hero (Jeff) told you PERSONALLY that this site is DEAD? WHY would he single you out. you and him got a THING?

Because, there is a possibility that I seem to have availed myself of, that you have not been able to concieve. I looked up his email address and CONTACTED him.
I expained myself briefly and I asked HIM if he still owned this site and was operating it. ( If he still CARED, basically. If he was taking personal legal responsibility for the site...) Months ago.

HE SAID NO! dammit!

You should/could try it yourself!

I don't understand the onus you guys seem to put on not posting "private" emails, but I guess I won't post it.


But it you want to see it, can I forward it to you? Perhaps it would be more ethical to do THAT? Jesus Chirst Facepalm!

Is it so damn hard to understand the evidence of your EYES? (name-redacted) boy... I fucking HAATE it when you call me a liar by implication. You don't know me from a pile of dogshit but calling me a LIAR and USING MY ACTUAL NAME is a douchbag move Dim Wit. The ethics of THAT are HUGELY more clear and it clearly shows you as a Turd flaming Douche.

(Name-redacted), I don't know you, but I don't pretend that I do, I would just as soon you go back to calling me Rokjox, as that is the only personality you actually know ANYTHING about. I would never use your actual name if you were not posting under that. (maybe it IS a psudonym? How would I know?)) That would be a fucked up thing to do. And no call for it, I don't need to pretend to be your buddy.


Everybody acts like they know me personally, when fact is, almost nobody on these forums has ever laid eyes on me,
they do NOT know me and I think Its rather like people sucking up to celebrities they have never actually met.



So whats the frigging matter? No fucking ethics, (Name-redacted)? In case you didn't notice, I don't use my name on forums. If you were not a douche, you'd respect that. And if you can't respect that, you can expect that if I ever get an ID on you, I will remember and punch your face, or failing that, fuck with you in some other way. Ah, maybe you'll get lucky and never go anywhere I can meet you.

If you KNEW me, you'd KNOW that THAT is the kind of guy I am.

Screw with me, I screw back. Act decent, and you got a loyal friend as long as you can stand it. Don't take liberties with people you don't know.

If you can't get a clue, take a class from an expert.


If you hear it from me, It's BANK.

I got no reason to lie about much.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on May 12, 2016, 9:58 AM)


ubu


May 11, 2016, 7:44 PM
Post #203 of 238 (22025 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1485

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
And if you can't respect that, you can expect that if I ever get an ID on you, I will remember and punch your face, or failing that, fuck with you in some other way. Ah, maybe you'll get lucky and never go anywhere I can meet you.

Wow. Is the Prozac dispenser broken this week?


sungam


May 11, 2016, 10:31 PM
Post #204 of 238 (22015 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [ubu] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well if my stone cold 100% hilarious and high quality goodposting can't get more than 2 posts in a week then I guess either I have an unrealistically high opinion of myself and my posting (not possible) or the website is totes dead o7o7o7


Rokjox


May 12, 2016, 9:54 AM
Post #205 of 238 (21986 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Hi Sungam,

Yes, you have been funny. I got no especial bad comments for you to read and keep you up at nights wondering how I could have been so mean. And its sad to see the passing of a forum and website that you spent a lot of time in. I used to read a lot here, although most of my posting was on ST, as I had been a valley climber for the most part of a decade. It seemed a more logical place for me, as I had known a number of the guys there in the stonemaster era.

Actually I didn't know them so well as I thought, mostly I just had slept and climbed and lived among them... but the actual period Stonemasters almost never actually had given me any grief, and still have not, with perhaps a couple exceptions, and I most likely earned that.




Ubu, I got some big welts remaining from my ST days, and I got security issues, also. My personal experience has demonstrated to me just exactly how dangerous websites can be. Once some shithead starts brown-nosing your identity, well, he isn't doing it as a favor. No good comes of that and I have begun to feel like the Beebman, just because you buy my album, you don't own a piece of me and I don't have to let you take a picture of us together like we are great buddies. We are NOT, we're strangers.

So to speak.

Guy should call me Mister Rokjox until I offer him my given game.



((thats supposed to be funny too... nothing here but echos...))


I am not an especially nice person, most likely not even a slightly nice person. I am not a gentlemans-gentleman; I am not a ladies man (wife says I am "A lady's man" -- hers) I am a guys-guy ar best, and one that grew up in somewhat violent areas, times and places. I fought other kids in school, other kids in gangs trying to beat hell outta me and a few tournments in college on some team. I have kicked shit out of a guy trying to rob me and my girl, I almost shot a couple others. It feels normal for me to be in a fight. Scary sometimes but kinda regular. And I have had my ass kicked a bunch. Wanta see some pictures? Fuckn Gruesome head shots! A 30th birthday party gone south... more or less.

So yeah, I probably need some prozac on occasion. Or some other chemical lobotomy.


Fighting.

Its my fall back posistion.





I see "BC" done retracted his post, so I will go pull HIS name/avatar reference... I think I may have implied a promise of reciprocity. Funny, considering his first post, that he got so stiff over my last one. I actually completely agreed with him on the OP.



Good luck Sungam. If you ever get up here, I can show you a better time than you might expect. Old ghosts know where the bodies are buried.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on May 12, 2016, 10:02 AM)


ajkclay


May 12, 2016, 10:40 AM
Post #206 of 238 (21981 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2002
Posts: 1567

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sad to see the site die, but I have to say it was the stupid trolls and bickering that saw me lose interest.

You couldn't have an opinion without the resident bullies weighing in and starting childish quote wars - which I will not deny I also got dragged into.

It dragged a lot of people down to levels that I think they did not like.

I've been a member since 2002 and honestly, while I say it is sad, the reality is, I'm more sad for what could have been, not what has been lost.


sungam


May 13, 2016, 5:03 AM
Post #207 of 238 (21929 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
Good luck Sungam. If you ever get up here, I can show you a better time than you might expect. Old ghosts know where the bodies are buried.

Careful - I have been known to take people up on offers like this! (I think there's a list somewhere of people from this sit who are still trying to get the smell out of their carpets)

Uh... That's assuming we're talking about climbing. If the bodies are literal then, ummm....


Rokjox


May 16, 2016, 2:24 AM
Post #208 of 238 (21799 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Climbers are bigmouths, it talks nothing to find every climb in north America any more.

Ski runs, bike rides and holes in the ground are much more poorly publicised.



One not quite local cave here was used to hide a corpse... funny thing, about 1/3 of the body is still missing including the head. The locals actually had sort of a party last year, where people went hunting for the other pieces.

I don't remember hearing they found them.


http://www.ktvb.com/news/local/isu-students-will-help-search-cave-for-human-head/175979856

I didn't get to go, but I gotta admit, it sounded like fun, crawling around in holes in the ground looking for rotting bodies. You just gotta have the right attitude.


(This post was edited by Rokjox on May 16, 2016, 3:22 AM)


johnwesely


May 16, 2016, 8:18 PM
Post #209 of 238 (21754 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I will never forget my teenage days
trolling for the lulz on rc.com
RIP fun website.


sungam


May 17, 2016, 6:29 PM
Post #210 of 238 (21699 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [johnwesely] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
I will never forget my teenage days
trolling for the lulz on rc.com
RIP fun website.
formative years, man


dynosore


May 18, 2016, 1:47 PM
Post #211 of 238 (21644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [johnwesely] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
I will never forget my teenage days
trolling for the lulz on rc.com
RIP fun website.

What shoes should I buy?

Can I tie in with a square knot?

If you use a grigri, the belayer doesn't need to pay attention......


billcoe_


Jun 18, 2016, 2:43 PM
Post #212 of 238 (20699 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rokjox wrote:
"Now please understand, if possible: I am seldom wrong, and I don't make shit up. Would it make you feel BETTER if your local hero (Jeff) told you PERSONALLY that this site is DEAD? WHY would he single you out. you and him got a THING? Because, there is a possibility that I seem to have availed myself of, that you have not been able to concieve. I looked up his email address and CONTACTED him. I expained myself briefly and I asked HIM if he still owned this site and was operating it. ( If he still CARED, basically. If he was taking personal legal responsibility for the site...) Months ago. HE SAID NO! dammit! You should/could try it yourself! I don't understand the onus you guys seem to put on not posting "private" emails, but I guess I won't post it. But it you want to see it, can I forward it to you? Perhaps it would be more ethical to do THAT? Jesus Chirst Facepalm! Is it so damn hard to understand the evidence of your EYES? (name-redacted) boy... I fucking HAATE it when you call me a liar by implication. You don't know me from a pile of dogshit but calling me a LIAR and USING MY ACTUAL NAME is a douchbag move Dim Wit. The ethics of THAT are HUGELY more clear and it clearly shows you as a Turd flaming Douche. (Name-redacted), I don't know you, but I don't pretend that I do, I would just as soon you go back to calling me Rokjox, as that is the only personality you actually know ANYTHING about. I would never use your actual name if you were not posting under that. (maybe it IS a psudonym? How would I know?)) That would be a fucked up thing to do. And no call for it, I don't need to pretend to be your buddy. Everybody acts like they know me personally, when fact is, almost nobody on these forums has ever laid eyes on me, they do NOT know me and I think Its rather like people sucking up to celebrities they have never actually met. So whats the frigging matter? No fucking ethics, (Name-redacted)? In case you didn't notice, I don't use my name on forums. If you were not a douche, you'd respect that. And if you can't respect that, you can expect that if I ever get an ID on you, I will remember and punch your face, or failing that, fuck with you in some other way. Ah, maybe you'll get lucky and never go anywhere I can meet you. If you KNEW me, you'd KNOW that THAT is the kind of guy I am. Screw with me, I screw back. Act decent, and you got a loyal friend as long as you can stand it. Don't take liberties with people you don't know. If you can't get a clue, take a class from an expert. If you hear it from me, It's BANK. I got no reason to lie about much.

Just reread the thread and saw this. You talking to me? I haven't changed or deleted any posts and I'm not sure where this shit is coming from. As far as real names, you want to use Roxjox or whatever, you can always ask nicely. Not a problem with me. I'll continue to do my thing, you don't want to reply with my real name, Bill Coe, you can use the avatar, Billcoe_ . Then I'll know who you are talking too, but (redacted) looks like it was directed at me. BTW, I didn't add the hyphen at the end to throw people off and hide who I am, the first attempt to log on using billcoe (no hyphen) only worked enough to not allow me to log on with that moniker. For myself, I'd rather keep it real. I'll talk to you straight here just like I would if it was eye to eye. I've met and climbed with some of the posters I've met on this site and had some great experiences that I'll cherish a long time.

Bill


Rokjox


Jun 22, 2016, 5:23 PM
Post #213 of 238 (20532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 71

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yes a part of that was directed to you. bc.

In reply to:
...resident bullies weighing in and starting childish quote wars -

(from another poster about why he was over this site. Was he talking about YOU?)

If you have the skills, please don't dup an entire post to make a point about a few sentences. Also don't destroy all the careful formatting, etc. You hide the meanings and confuse the issues. But you know that.


Here, I have also re-read the thread prior, to see what is your complaint.

I stand by the post. In whole and in the part that concerns you.




You are a douche. A smart ass who somewhere found my name (from the other douche Radas posts on a similar vein in the back room, most likely) and you know it pisses me off for it to be brown-nosed like that. I have clearly said as much. You also know that its widely considered douchery to do that kind of thing over the internet as a whole.

So yes, I have no actual problem saying it, if you insist... and you appear to insist I use your name. Ok..


"Bill Coe, you are a douche."

A passive-agressive pussy-douche to put a more fine point to it.


google that twice.

I see your reading comprehension is also poor. I did ask you nicely. Here I will make it brain dead stupid simple.


Remove your reference to my name from your prior post.


You don't know me, we have never met to my knowlege and we are not on a first name basis. I post as Rokjox, consistantly, I am not hiding, either. And FYI, I am not one of the guys you have had fun with, ...rather expect I might not have missed a thing, either.

What a douche.


Let me leave you with a reminder for the short of attention. This is a stupid thread. Stupid is as stupid does. Why don't you just pull your post -- all of them? This thread is from its first post (yours) a whinefest straight out of Kalifornia (just a guess?). A complete snivel about locking the first thread, and how YOU ain't thinking that thats right, so You are gonna re-animate the thread, against somebody elses better (and more powerful) judgement. YOU wanna tell the owner how to run it's site. Well, don't we all...

In reply to:
I'm 60 years old, have been rockclimbing for 43 years. I own my own business and don't need you to be my mother.
From your (bc) first post here. During the OP whine about why this site has died, how you want it to be changed back, whose fault it is, etc.


I am a little older and been climbing a little longer, but other than that, we are of the same mint. You should know better. You Do know better. Your first post shows it; shouts it.




Bill Coe is a douche.




""I approve this message" Rokjox B. Teleski


(This post was edited by Rokjox on Jun 22, 2016, 6:17 PM)


Partner macherry


Jul 18, 2016, 7:38 PM
Post #214 of 238 (19735 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [Rokjox] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

drive by. the owner jeff hasn't logged in since april. no new posts. i believe this website is adrift, pretty much done. i don't think that's news to anyone


kobaz


Jul 20, 2016, 7:56 PM
Post #215 of 238 (19651 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
drive by. the owner jeff hasn't logged in since april. no new posts. i believe this website is adrift, pretty much done. i don't think that's news to anyone

It's gone. Done. Kaput. It is an ex-parrot.

No new news articles. No gear reviews. No one is going to bother posting trip reports and partner requests to a site that's not worth visiting anymore :(

I have fond memories of the old rc.com. I've climbed with a number of members and had some great gear discussions. I hit up this site maybe once a month now to check if there's anything new. And so far the only real new thing is the home brew treadwall (which is cool), and this thread.

Poor poor old rc.com. Peoples have moved to greener pastures.


sungam


Jul 21, 2016, 4:42 AM
Post #216 of 238 (19622 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [macherry] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
drive by. the owner jeff hasn't logged in since april. no new posts. i believe this website is adrift, pretty much done. i don't think that's news to anyone
Hey Ma!!!!!


Partner macherry


Jul 21, 2016, 5:45 PM
Post #217 of 238 (19594 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hey sungam


billcoe_


Jul 27, 2016, 4:56 AM
Post #218 of 238 (19401 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [kobaz] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 

Yup. It's like Jeff doesn't even care anymore. Maybe he's open to selling it to the members?

Hey Ma, didn't you use to be a mod here? Did ya make any scratch on that?


curt


Jul 27, 2016, 5:50 AM
Post #219 of 238 (19398 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

billcoe_ wrote:
Yup. It's like Jeff doesn't even care anymore. Maybe he's open to selling it to the members?

Even if the price was "free" you'd probably be overpaying. This is something Jeff has probably figured out.

Curt


Partner macherry


Jul 27, 2016, 6:23 PM
Post #221 of 238 (19379 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [billcoe_] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

not a thing. a few pro deals on climbing gear, but that was way way back.


ryannremtp


Jul 30, 2016, 6:10 PM
Post #223 of 238 (19241 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 14, 2006
Posts: 20

Re: [ncrockclimber] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow, this forum has changed since I was last here.


iknowfear


Aug 2, 2016, 5:40 PM
Post #224 of 238 (19077 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 670

Re: [ryannremtp] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ryannremtp wrote:
Wow, this forum has changed since I was last here.

yeah, its now much more familiy friendly.

like a diner in the midwest.

In the walking dead world.


ryannremtp


Aug 4, 2016, 1:31 AM
Post #225 of 238 (18365 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 14, 2006
Posts: 20

Re: [iknowfear] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, it does have that ghost town feel.


climbingtrash


Nov 23, 2016, 3:42 PM
Post #226 of 238 (16787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [ryannremtp] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ryannremtp wrote:
Yeah, it does have that ghost town feel.

I kan haz yore PT?


climbingtrash


Nov 23, 2016, 3:42 PM
Post #227 of 238 (16787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [ryannremtp] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wo0?!?


climbingtrash


Nov 23, 2016, 3:42 PM
Post #228 of 238 (16787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
PTFTW I HAVE SAVED U ALL ))))))

^this?!?


climbingtrash


Nov 23, 2016, 3:42 PM
Post #229 of 238 (16787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Angelic


anarkhos


Jan 12, 2017, 6:21 AM
Post #230 of 238 (16196 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2006
Posts: 229

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

First (last?) post of 2017!


sungam


Jan 31, 2017, 6:03 PM
Post #231 of 238 (15892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [anarkhos] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

anarkhos wrote:
First (last?) post of 2017!
I can't leave this one hanging


climbingtrash


Dec 15, 2017, 4:03 PM
Post #232 of 238 (14420 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114

Re: [sungam] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sungam wrote:
anarkhos wrote:
First (last?) post of 2017!
I can't leave this one hanging

Last post of teh year FTW?!?


onceahardman


Dec 22, 2017, 1:05 AM
Post #233 of 238 (14346 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2493

Re: [climbingtrash] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
anarkhos wrote:
First (last?) post of 2017!
I can't leave this one hanging

Last post of teh year FTW?!?

LAST !!

(ever)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Jan 9, 2018, 6:15 PM
Post #234 of 238 (13946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208

Re: [onceahardman] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

onceahardman wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
anarkhos wrote:
First (last?) post of 2017!
I can't leave this one hanging

Last post of teh year FTW?!?

LAST !!

(ever)

Wait - my login still works!


curt


Feb 9, 2018, 2:31 PM
Post #235 of 238 (13226 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
onceahardman wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
sungam wrote:
anarkhos wrote:
First (last?) post of 2017!
I can't leave this one hanging

Last post of teh year FTW?!?

LAST !!

(ever)

Wait - my login still works!

Sad. Like a child on life support.

Curt


Partner polarwid


Feb 19, 2018, 2:30 AM
Post #236 of 238 (12947 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 22, 2001
Posts: 3608

Re: [theguy] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Someone say drive-by posting???


rgbscan


Apr 9, 2018, 4:47 PM
Post #237 of 238 (11492 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2003
Posts: 106

Re: [polarwid] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

polarwid wrote:
Someone say drive-by posting???

Zoom zoom!


kobaz


Apr 9, 2018, 9:36 PM
Post #238 of 238 (11483 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: [rgbscan] This place is dead part 2 (exclamation mark not needed) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh man.

I haven't visited this site in probably like two years and the topic came up between some friends as to what ever happened with rockclimbing.com anyway.

Apparently nothing. It's dead... dead... dead.

Looks like the new owner could care less about the users and community he paid for. I had fond memories from when this site actually mattered.

Oh well... Looks like mountain project won the battle... it wasn't much of one.


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook